2
Correct Site Surgery © Association for Perioperative Practice 2006 Second check to be made by ward/day care staff prior to patient leaving ward/day care area: inspect mark against patient’s supporting documentation – patient’s notes, consent form, patient’s I.D. band ensure availability of relevant imaging studies in operating theatre/suite Third check to be made by operating surgeon or competent nominated deputy in anaesthetic room prior to anaesthesia: inspect mark and check against supporting documentation – patient’s notes, consent form, patient’s I.D. band re-check imaging studies check availability of correct implant (where appropriate) Final check to be made by the entire team. Surgical, anaesthetic and theatre team pause before commencing surgery for everyone present to confirm: presence of correct patient marking of the correct site procedure to be performed First check to be made by surgeon or competent nominated deputy to be present at operation: check patient’s identity band or ask patient to identify themselves – name and date of birth. Involve patient/family member/significant other check reliable documents/image for intended surgical site – patient’s notes and consent form mark with an indelible pen using an arrow at or near the intended incision. For digits the arrow should extend to the correct specific digit(s) 1 2 3 4 Circumstances where marking may not be appropriate: emergency surgery should not be delayed surgery on teeth or mucous membranes bilateral procedures such as tonsillectomy and squint surgery situations where laterality of surgery will be confirmed during the procedure If a patient refuses preoperative skin marking local policy should be followed but include: document patient’s request in the nursing and medical notes complete correct site surgery checklist but clearly state patient refuses marking. This will ensure staff are aware at each stage of the process managing the risk

Correct Site Surgery © Association for Perioperative

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Correct Site Surgery © Association for Perioperative

Correct Site Surgery © Association for Perioperative Practice 2006

Second check to be made by ward/day care staff prior to patient leaving ward/day care area:

inspect mark against patient’s supporting documentation – patient’s notes, consent form, patient’s I.D. band

ensure availability of relevant imaging studies in operating theatre/suite

Third check to be made by operating surgeon or competent nominateddeputy in anaesthetic room prior to anaesthesia:

inspect mark and check against supporting documentation – patient’s notes, consent form, patient’s I.D. band

re-check imaging studies

check availability of correct implant (where appropriate)

Final check to be made by the entire team. Surgical, anaesthetic and theatre team pausebefore commencing surgery for everyone present to confirm:

presence of correct patient

marking of the correct site

procedure to be performed

First check to be made by surgeon or competent nominated deputy to be present at operation:

check patient’s identity band or ask patient to identify themselves – name and date of birth. Involve patient/family member/significant other

check reliable documents/image for intended surgical site – patient’s notes and consent form

mark with an indelible pen using an arrow at or near the intended incision. For digits the arrow should extend to the correct specific digit(s)

1

2

3

4Circumstances where marking maynot be appropriate:

emergency surgery should not be delayed

surgery on teeth or mucous membranes

bilateral procedures such as tonsillectomy and squint surgery

situations where laterality of surgery will be confirmed during the procedure

If a patient refuses preoperative skinmarking local policy should be followed but include:

document patient’s request in the nursing and medical notes

complete correct site surgery checklist but clearly state patient refuses marking. This will ensure staff are aware at each stage of the process

managing the risk

Page 2: Correct Site Surgery © Association for Perioperative

Cor

rect

Site

Sur

gery

man

agin

g th

e ri

skCo

rrec

t Si

te S

urge

ry –

the

err

ors

we

know

abo

ut

Janu

ary

2000

a m

an in

Car

mar

then

shire

die

s af

ter

wro

ng k

idne

y re

mov

ed.

Mar

ch 2

006

a he

alth

y ki

dney

was

rem

oved

fro

m a

man

in A

yrsh

ire.

May

200

6 G

ener

al M

edic

al C

ounc

il (G

MC

) he

arin

g re

gard

ing

a su

rgeo

n w

ho r

emov

ed a

pa

tient

’s t

rans

plan

ted

kidn

ey in

stea

d of

her

nat

ural

one

.

Ana

lysi

s of

the

abo

ve in

cide

nces

fou

nd t

hat

syst

em f

ailu

res,

def

icie

ncie

s in

the

pro

cess

and

lack

of

robu

st v

erifi

catio

nch

ecks

left

the

patie

nt a

nd s

urge

on v

ulne

rabl

e.

Corr

ect

Site

Sur

gery

– t

he f

acts

we

wan

t to

cha

nge

Wor

k by

the

Nat

iona

l Pat

ient

Saf

ety

Age

ncy

(NP

SA

) ca

lcul

ates

tha

t th

e er

ror

of w

rong

site

su

rger

y oc

curs

app

roxi

mat

ely

400

times

a y

ear

with

in t

he U

K N

atio

nal H

ealth

Ser

vice

(N

HS

).

Sur

gery

per

form

ed o

n th

e w

rong

site

or

the

wro

ng p

atie

nt is

rar

e bu

t su

ch m

ista

kes

have

dev

asta

ting

cons

eque

nces

for

the

patie

nt.

Del

iver

ing

safe

pat

ient

car

e is

fun

dam

enta

l to

the

role

of

all t

he s

urgi

cal m

edic

al a

nd n

on-m

edic

al t

eam

. The

NP

SA

foun

d th

at a

cros

s th

e N

HS

the

re w

as n

o si

ngle

sta

ndar

d m

etho

d fo

r m

arki

ng a

sur

gica

l site

, th

eref

ore

incr

easi

ngth

e ris

k of

mis

take

s by

inco

nsis

tent

ver

ifica

tion

of t

hat

patie

nt b

y st

aff.

The

impo

rtan

ce o

f sa

fe c

heck

ing

proc

edur

es le

d th

e N

PS

Aan

d R

oyal

Col

lege

of

Sur

geon

s (R

CS

) to

pub

lish

reco

mm

enda

tions

for

sur

gica

l mar

king

and

to

prod

uce

a st

anda

rdis

ed c

heck

list

to p

rom

ote

Cor

rect

Site

Sur

gery

.

The

fol

low

ing

guid

elin

es h

ave

been

dev

elop

ed t

o en

able

per

iope

rativ

e pr

actit

ione

rs a

nd s

urgi

cal w

ard

staf

f to

use

pr

eope

rativ

e m

arki

ng r

ecom

men

datio

ns t

o en

sure

tha

t th

e co

rrec

t pa

tient

has

the

cor

rect

ope

ratio

n at

the

cor

rect

site

.

The

Ass

ocia

tion

for

Per

iope

rativ

e P

ract

ice

(AfP

P)

ackn

owle

dges

the

con

trib

utio

n of

Dia

ne G

ilmou

r, S

urre

y an

d S

usse

xH

ealth

care

NH

S T

rust

, P

eggy

Edw

ards

and

the

NP

SA

for

thei

r he

lp in

for

mul

atin

g th

is g

uida

nce.

Refe

renc

es a

nd F

urth

er R

eadi

ng

Ass

ocia

tion

of A

naes

thet

ists

of

Gre

at B

ritai

n an

d Ir

elan

d 20

03 T

heat

re E

ffic

ienc

y:sa

fety

,qua

lity

of c

are

and

optim

al u

se o

f re

sour

ces

Lond

on, A

AG

BI

Ass

ocia

tion

for

Per

iope

rativ

e P

ract

ice

2006

Ris

k an

d Qu

ality

Man

agem

ent

Syst

em H

arro

gate

, AfP

P

Com

mis

sion

for

Hea

lth I

mpr

ovem

ent

2000

Inve

stig

atio

n in

to C

arm

arth

ensh

ire

NHS

Trus

t W

ales

, C

HI

Edw

ards

P20

06 P

rom

otin

g co

rrec

t si

te s

urge

ry J

ourn

al o

f Pe

riop

erat

ive

Prac

tice

16 (

2) 8

0–86

Nat

iona

l Ass

ocia

tion

of T

heat

re N

urse

s 20

04 N

ATN

Stan

dard

s an

d Re

com

men

datio

ns f

or S

afe

Peri

oper

ativ

e Pr

actic

eH

arro

gate

, N

AT

N

Nat

iona

l Pat

ient

Saf

ety

Age

ncy

2005

Pat

ient

Saf

ety

Aler

t 06

Lond

on,

NP

SA

http

://w

ww

.saf

erhe

alth

care

.org

.uk

http

://w

ww

.nps

a.nh

s.uk

Ass

ocia

tion

for P

erio

pera

tive

Prac

tice

ww

w.a

fpp.

org.

ukD

aisy

Ayr

is H

ouse

, 6

Gro

ve P

ark

Cou

rt,

Har

roga

te,

HG

1 4D

P

Tel:

+44

(0)

1423

508

079

Fax

: +

44 (

0)14

23 5

3161

3

Correct S

ite Surgery

managing the risk

12

34