12
RESEARCH ARTICLE SPECIAL COLLECTION: TRANSLATIONAL IMPACT OF RAT Correlation between afferent rearrangements and behavioral deficits after local excitotoxic insult in the mammalian vestibule: a rat model of vertigo symptoms Sophie Gaboyard-Niay 1,2, *, Ce ́ cile Travo 1 , Aure ́ lie Saleur 2 , Audrey Broussy 2 , Aurore Brugeaud 2 and Christian Chabbert 1,3 ABSTRACT Damage to inner ear afferent terminals is believed to result in many auditory and vestibular dysfunctions. The sequence of afferent injuries and repair, as well as their correlation with vertigo symptoms, remains poorly documented. In particular, information on the changes that take place at the primary vestibular endings during the first hours following a selective insult is lacking. In the present study, we combined histological analysis with behavioral assessments of vestibular function in a rat model of unilateral vestibular excitotoxic insult. Excitotoxicity resulted in an immediate but transient alteration of the balance function that was resolved within a week. Concomitantly, vestibular primary afferents underwent a sequence of structural changes followed by spontaneous repair. Within the first two hours after the insult, a first phase of pronounced vestibular dysfunction coincided with extensive swelling of afferent terminals. In the next 24 h, a second phase of significant but incomplete reduction of the vestibular dysfunction was accompanied by a resorption of swollen terminals and fiber retraction. Eventually, within 1 week, a third phase of complete balance restoration occurred. The slow and progressive withdrawal of the balance dysfunction correlated with full reconstitution of nerve terminals. Competitive re-innervation by afferent and efferent terminals that mimicked developmental synaptogenesis resulted in full re-afferentation of the sensory epithelia. By deciphering the sequence of structural alterations that occur in the vestibule during selective excitotoxic impairment, this study offers new understanding of how a vestibular insult develops in the vestibule and how it governs the heterogeneity of vertigo symptoms. KEY WORDS: Excitotoxicity, Calyx terminals, Hair cells, Physiopathology, Vestibule, Functional recovery INTRODUCTION Vestibular disorder symptoms include vertigo, dizziness, postural imbalance and lack of gaze fixation during head movements. Although they might have a central origin, it is commonly believed that they predominantly result from transient or permanent impairments of vestibular function in the inner ear (Brandt et al., 2009; Chabbert, 2013; Soto and Vega, 2010). The static deficits commonly encountered following a unilateral vestibular insult, consisting of ocular nystagmus and postural instability, are generally attributed to a functional imbalance between bilateral vestibular nuclei (Curthoys and Halmagyi, 1995; Dieringer, 1995). However, the mechanisms that support the vestibular dysfunction or lack of function have never been fully elucidated so far. This lack of knowledge impairs the development of pharmacological approaches aiming to efficiently protect the vestibule under pathological conditions. Different aetiologies including alterations of endolymph properties, insult to sensory cells or death, and uncoupling of vestibular afferents resulting from diverse pathogenic situations have been proposed to explain sudden vestibular dysfunction. Among these pathogenic conditions including ototoxicity, infections, ischemia, trauma, inflammation or aging the impact of the excitotoxicity remains unclear. Often associated with ischemic conditions, clinical confirmation generally relies on identification of stroke or thrombosis with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (Iadecola and Anrather, 2011). However, excitotoxic damage can be far more subtle, remaining imperceptible with MRI. Excitotoxicity is primarily a pathophysiological phenomenon that affects specifically glutamatergic synapses (Olney, 1969). This process results from the excessive release of glutamate in the vicinity of presynaptic elements and its spill over within the synaptic cleft, and from the sustained activation of glutamate receptors located at postsynaptic terminals. Under these conditions, the prolonged afflux of cations in the postsynaptic terminal is accompanied by an influx of water that in turn induces swelling of dendrites and could lead to complete synaptic uncoupling. The sensory structures of the inner ear, including hair cells and primary neurons, are excitable cells. Along with neurons from the central nervous system, they are particularly vulnerable to excitotoxicity. When exposed to ischemic and reperfusion conditions (Puel et al., 1995; Tabuchi et al., 2002), or acoustic trauma (Kujawa and Liberman, 2009; Puel et al., 1998), the cochlea exhibits characteristic patterns of excitotoxic damage. Synaptic damage and its associated functional impairments are significantly reduced in the presence of selective blockers of glutamate receptors (Puel et al., 1994, 1998). Based on these pre-clinical proofs of concept, clinical studies using similar types of protective approaches for auditory synapses have demonstrated a significant reduction in the tinnitus associated with acoustic trauma (van de Heyning et al., 2014). At the vestibular level, partial or complete degeneration of vestibular end organs has been demonstrated in humans in conditions of vertebrobasilar artery occlusion (Kitamura and Berreby, 1983; Oas and Baloh, 1992). This damage has been Received 6 January 2016; Accepted 21 June 2016 1 INSERM U1051, Montpellier 34090, France. 2 Sensorion, Montpellier 34000, France. 3 Aix Marseille University UMR 7260, 13331 Marseille, France. *Author for correspondence ([email protected]) S.G.-N., 0000-0001-8256-8692 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed. 1181 © 2016. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Disease Models & Mechanisms (2016) 9, 1181-1192 doi:10.1242/dmm.024521 Disease Models & Mechanisms

Correlation between afferent rearrangements and behavioral … · vestibular afferents resulting from diverse pathogenic situations – have been proposed to explain sudden vestibular

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • RESEARCH ARTICLE SPECIAL COLLECTION: TRANSLATIONAL IMPACT OF RAT

    Correlation between afferent rearrangements and behavioraldeficits after local excitotoxic insult in the mammalian vestibule:a rat model of vertigo symptomsSophie Gaboyard-Niay1,2,*, Cécile Travo1, Aurélie Saleur2, Audrey Broussy2, Aurore Brugeaud2 andChristian Chabbert1,3

    ABSTRACTDamage to inner ear afferent terminals is believed to result in manyauditory and vestibular dysfunctions. The sequence of afferentinjuries and repair, as well as their correlation with vertigosymptoms, remains poorly documented. In particular, informationon the changes that take place at the primary vestibular endingsduring the first hours following a selective insult is lacking. In thepresent study, we combined histological analysis with behavioralassessments of vestibular function in a rat model of unilateralvestibular excitotoxic insult. Excitotoxicity resulted in an immediatebut transient alteration of the balance function that was resolvedwithin a week. Concomitantly, vestibular primary afferents underwenta sequence of structural changes followed by spontaneous repair.Within the first two hours after the insult, a first phase of pronouncedvestibular dysfunction coincided with extensive swelling of afferentterminals. In the next 24 h, a second phase of significant butincomplete reduction of the vestibular dysfunction was accompaniedby a resorption of swollen terminals and fiber retraction. Eventually,within 1week, a third phase of complete balance restoration occurred.The slow and progressive withdrawal of the balance dysfunctioncorrelated with full reconstitution of nerve terminals. Competitivere-innervation by afferent and efferent terminals that mimickeddevelopmental synaptogenesis resulted in full re-afferentation of thesensory epithelia. By deciphering the sequence of structuralalterations that occur in the vestibule during selective excitotoxicimpairment, this study offers new understanding of how a vestibularinsult develops in the vestibule and how it governs the heterogeneityof vertigo symptoms.

    KEY WORDS: Excitotoxicity, Calyx terminals, Hair cells,Physiopathology, Vestibule, Functional recovery

    INTRODUCTIONVestibular disorder symptoms include vertigo, dizziness, posturalimbalance and lack of gaze fixation during head movements.Although they might have a central origin, it is commonly believedthat they predominantly result from transient or permanent

    impairments of vestibular function in the inner ear (Brandt et al.,2009; Chabbert, 2013; Soto and Vega, 2010). The static deficitscommonly encountered following a unilateral vestibular insult,consisting of ocular nystagmus and postural instability, aregenerally attributed to a functional imbalance between bilateralvestibular nuclei (Curthoys and Halmagyi, 1995; Dieringer, 1995).However, the mechanisms that support the vestibular dysfunction orlack of function have never been fully elucidated so far. This lack ofknowledge impairs the development of pharmacological approachesaiming to efficiently protect the vestibule under pathologicalconditions.

    Different aetiologies – including alterations of endolymphproperties, insult to sensory cells or death, and uncoupling ofvestibular afferents resulting from diverse pathogenic situations –have been proposed to explain sudden vestibular dysfunction.Among these pathogenic conditions – including ototoxicity,infections, ischemia, trauma, inflammation or aging – the impactof the excitotoxicity remains unclear. Often associated withischemic conditions, clinical confirmation generally relies onidentification of stroke or thrombosis with magnetic resonanceimaging (MRI) (Iadecola andAnrather, 2011). However, excitotoxicdamage can be far more subtle, remaining imperceptible with MRI.Excitotoxicity is primarily a pathophysiological phenomenon thataffects specifically glutamatergic synapses (Olney, 1969). Thisprocess results from the excessive release of glutamate in the vicinityof presynaptic elements and its spill over within the synaptic cleft,and from the sustained activation of glutamate receptors located atpostsynaptic terminals. Under these conditions, the prolonged affluxof cations in the postsynaptic terminal is accompanied by an influxof water that in turn induces swelling of dendrites and could lead tocomplete synaptic uncoupling.

    The sensory structures of the inner ear, including hair cells andprimary neurons, are excitable cells. Along with neurons fromthe central nervous system, they are particularly vulnerable toexcitotoxicity. When exposed to ischemic and reperfusionconditions (Puel et al., 1995; Tabuchi et al., 2002), or acoustictrauma (Kujawa and Liberman, 2009; Puel et al., 1998), the cochleaexhibits characteristic patterns of excitotoxic damage. Synapticdamage and its associated functional impairments are significantlyreduced in the presence of selective blockers of glutamate receptors(Puel et al., 1994, 1998). Based on these pre-clinical proofs ofconcept, clinical studies using similar types of protectiveapproaches for auditory synapses have demonstrated a significantreduction in the tinnitus associated with acoustic trauma (van deHeyning et al., 2014). At the vestibular level, partial or completedegeneration of vestibular end organs has been demonstrated inhumans in conditions of vertebrobasilar artery occlusion (Kitamuraand Berreby, 1983; Oas and Baloh, 1992). This damage has beenReceived 6 January 2016; Accepted 21 June 2016

    1INSERM U1051, Montpellier 34090, France. 2Sensorion, Montpellier 34000,France. 3Aix Marseille University UMR 7260, 13331 Marseille, France.

    *Author for correspondence ([email protected])

    S.G.-N., 0000-0001-8256-8692

    This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons AttributionLicense (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use,distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

    1181

    © 2016. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Disease Models & Mechanisms (2016) 9, 1181-1192 doi:10.1242/dmm.024521

    Disea

    seModels&Mechan

    isms

    http://dmm.biologists.org/collection/rat-disease-modelmailto:[email protected]://orcid.org/0000-0001-8256-8692http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0

  • implicated in the acute vestibular disorders experienced byindividuals. Excitotoxic insult of vestibular primary afferents hasbeen proposed as a possible cause of vestibular neuritis (Dyhrfjeld-Johnsen et al., 2013). More recently, the notion of repeatedexcitotoxic insults in the vestibular sensory epithelia, as the result ofblood perfusion alteration in the inner ear, has also been proposed toexplain the iterative and progressive symptomology of Menier̀e’ssyndrome (Foster and Breeze, 2013).The recent development of animal and in vitro models of

    excitotoxically-induced vestibular insults has provided theopportunity to confirm the central role of glutamate in theexcitotoxic cascade and to identify the cellular effectors involved(Brugeaud et al., 2007; Liu, 1999; Shimogori and Yamashita,2004). Interestingly, some studies have reported the capacity of theneuronal vestibular network to spontaneously undergo repairfollowing selective destruction of the vestibular primary synapses(Travo et al., 2012) and to support functional restoration (Brugeaudet al., 2007). Taken together, these studies highlight the cellularevents that occur in the first days after the induction of the vestibularinsult and that support excitotoxically-induced vestibulardysfunction. What is primarily lacking today is acquisition ofinformation on what happens in the first hours after the onset of theinsult. This information is essential for the development of earlyprotection strategies to counteract the excitotoxically-inducedvestibular insult.The present study was designed to directly address this gap in our

    understanding. Using an excitotoxic paradigm to mimic vestibularpathological conditions, we detailed the time course of inducedbalance disorders using behavior testing, together with cellularchanges that occur at the contact between vestibular hair cells andtheir nerve afferent terminals by using immunohistochemistry, aswell as light, electron and confocal microscopy. We report a directcorrelation between the peak crisis of vestibular disorder symptomsand severe damage to afferent terminals in the very early stages ofthe response to insult. This study also confirms the remarkableplasticity of the vestibular afferent terminals to engage a repairprocess following excitotoxic injury.

    RESULTSAltered vestibular behavior following transtympanicinjection of kainic acidSingle and unilateral (right ear) transtympanic injection of kainicacid [single transtympanic kainic acid (STTK) injection, 12.5 mM,100 µl] rapidly elicited stereotypical vestibular dysfunction that wascharacterized by circling behavior, walking backward and headbobbing when exploring. The rat also displayed body torsion duringtail hanging and failed to rectify full supine position in the airrighting or contact inhibition reflex tests. Vestibular dysfunctionscores were collected according to the method previously described(Brugeaud et al., 2007; Desmadryl et al., 2012; Llorens et al., 1993;Llorens and Rodriguez-Farre, 1997). The time course of the onsetand progress of the vestibular dysfunction was studied at differenttime points from 1 h to 1 week following the STTK injection(Fig. 1).Following the STTK injection, pronounced altered vestibular

    behavior was evident as soon as the rats awakened from anesthesia.Altered vestibular behavior developed in three distinct phases. Aninitial phase was identifiable within the first two hours following theinsult induction (Fig. 1, insert). One hour following the insultinduction, the mean vestibular dysfunction score had alreadyexceeded 7 (7.34±0.77, n=29; mean±s.e.m.), and peaked at 9.90±0.62 (n=20) 1.5 h after administration of the kainate. The mean

    peak score statistically differed from the score at 1 h after theinduction (P=0.018). A second phase with quite stable thoughhighly pronounced vestibular dysfunction lasted between 2 and 7 h[8.08± 0.84 (n=23) and 6.15±0.58 (n=26) at 2 and 7 h, respectively]after the initial insult. Subsequently, a third phase of progressiverecovery occurred with slowly reduced vestibular dysfunction. At96 h post induction, this phase ended with a complete withdrawal ofvestibular dysfunction. At this time, mean score values of 1.14±0.55 (n=7) did not statistically differ from those obtained in normalpre-lesioned animals (P=0.125).

    In summary, following unilateral excitotoxic insult, threedifferent phases of altered behavior were observed: (1) a fast andacute crisis within 2 h following the insult, (2) a stable phase ofpronounced vestibular dysfunction lasting 7 h after the inductionand (3) a slower recovery period that lasted 4 days before normalfunctional behavior was restored.

    Evidence of excitotoxic damage at vestibular afferentterminals in the first hours following transtympanic injectionof kainic acidTo verify whether the observed kainic-acid-induced vestibulardysfunctions stem from direct damage to vestibular end organs, thetissue was processed for analysis with electron microscopy. Thequalitative aspect of the lesion and/or repair was assessed in theutricle on both semi- and ultra-thin sections to investigate thecondition of the tissue condition both at cellular and subcellularlevels. Figs 2–4 illustrate the early damage observed at thesubcellular level 2 h after the STTK injection (Fig 2), the patternsof change in tissue conditions from 2 h to 24 h after the STTKinjection (Fig 3) and the quantification of these morphologicalchanges from 1 h to 1 week after the STTK injection (Fig 4). Thismorphometric analysis was performed on ultra-thin sections. Tissuedamage observed in the injured ear was always compared to theintact contralateral ear that did not receive the transtympanic kainateinjection. In controlateral tissue, a typical morphology of sensoryepithelia containing type I and type II hair cells and supporting cellswas observed (Fig. 2A,B; Fig. 3A).

    Fig. 1. Vestibular dysfunction induced by a single transtympanicinjection of kainic acid. As soon as 1 h after the injection, vestibulardysfunction was induced. The peak crisis was maximal at 1.5 h and lasted until7 h post injection (*P

  • Using electron microscopy, we examined the vestibular sensoryepithelia at the cellular and subcellular levels (Fig. 2). Two hoursafter the STTK injection, typical features of glutamate-elicitedexcitotoxicity were observed in the injured epithelia (Fig. 2C-F).Some hair cells with their typical afferent terminals were stillpresent: type I hair cells exhibited a pear shape connected bysurrounding calyx terminals, whereas type II hair cells displayed amore cylindrical shape and were innervated by classic boutonterminals; however, most of the afferent terminals were very

    swollen, leaving large vacuoles all along the sensory epithelia(Fig. 2C,D). Membrane disruption of damaged afferent terminalswas often observed (Fig. 2E,F). Vacuoles resulting from theswelling of afferent terminals were so extensive that hair cells weredistorted and generally no longer identifiable as type I or type II hair

    Fig. 2. Excitotoxic injury in vestibular utricles observed 2 h after lesionformation with electron microscopy. (A,B) In control tissue, type I hair cells(I) surrounded by calyx nerve endings and cylindrical type II hair cells (II) wereidentified lying over the nuclear layer of supporting cells (sc). (C-F) In injuredinner ear, a few type I hair cells could still be identified from the calyx terminal.Most hair cell types became undetermined (*) because of their distortedmorphology induced by large swellings at their base (a). Localization andmitochondrial content was used to characterize the swollen structures asafferent terminals (a). Scale bars: 10 µm (A-D); 2 µm (E,F).

    Fig. 3. Changes over time in the general organization of vestibularepithelia after induced excitotoxic injury. The gross morphology wasobserved on semi-thin sections of vestibular utricles. (A) In control ears, theregular macro-organization of hair cells and supporting cells constitutes thesensory epithelium lying on a conjunctive tissue, where innervating fibersarrive. (B) 2 h after the STTK injection, large holes appeared between thelayers of nuclei of hair and supporting cells. (C-E) Between 7 h and 12 h postlesion, the size of swellings progressively decreased. (F) At 24 h post lesionformation, no more vacuoles were observed in the sensory epithelium, whosegross morphology appeared similar to the contralateral one. Notice theinnervating fibers were always present underneath the injured sensoryepithelium. Scale bars: 100 µm.

    1183

    RESEARCH ARTICLE Disease Models & Mechanisms (2016) 9, 1181-1192 doi:10.1242/dmm.024521

    Disea

    seModels&Mechan

    isms

  • cells with regard to their morphology (Fig. 2D-F). Supporting cellswere also squeezed, whereas their nuclei remained in the correctposition (Fig. 2D,E). No obvious morphological changes of efferentterminals were observed at this time (data not shown). Changes thatmight have occurred presynaptically were not investigated in thepresent study.At the tissue level, the large swellings and induced distortion of

    the sensory and supporting cells within the epithelium wereobserved in semi-thin sections (Fig. 3). The quantification of haircells based on their morphology clearly demonstrated an increase inthe number of hair cells for which the specific type I or type II

    classification could no longer be assigned because of themorphological changes that had occurred 2 h after the STTKinjection.

    On the basis of histological analysis of vestibular sensoryepithelia 2 h after the STTK injection, it can be concluded that theacute peak of altered vestibular behavioral crisis coincided withstereotypical features of excitotoxic damage to afferent terminalswithin the vestibular epithelia.

    Resorption of swollen afferent terminals in the first 24 hfollowing excitotoxic damageThe utricle, a sensory graviceptor, was observed at the tissue leveland quantified at the cellular level in semi-thin sections covering theentire period from 1 h to 1 week after the STTK injection. At thetissue level, the epithelial damage and its progressive resorptionwere obvious between 2 h and 24 h after the STTK injection(Fig. 3). The time course analysis of the vestibular damage in theutricle at several time points between 2 and 24 h following theSTTK injection demonstrated a progressive reduction in the size andnumber of the swollen afferent terminals (Fig. 3B-F). During thatperiod, despite extensive swelling inside the sensory epithelia,afferent terminals were seen beneath the epithelia in the conjunctivetissue. In semi-thin sections, the kainic acid-induced damage hadalmost completely resolved 24 h after the STTK injection (Fig. 3F).The general organization of the sensory epithelia appearednormal when compared to that of the contralateral non-injuredepithelia (Fig. 3A). Histological analysis of crista ampullarisgross morphology following STTK injection provided resultssimilar to those obtained in utricles (Fig. S1). Altogether,histological observations over the first 24 h following theSTTK injection clearly demonstrated a spontaneous resorption ofthe excitotoxically-induced afferent terminal swelling in themammalian vestibular sensory epithelia.

    In order to specify the time course of the swelling resorption, weperformed a morphometric analysis of utricle epithelia over the 24-hperiod following induction of the excitotoxic insult. The differentcell types were identified and quantified using definedmorphological criteria to discriminate between supporting cellsand hair cells: type I, type II or undetermined. These criteria werebased on the localization of nuclei within the sensory epitheliumand the hair cell shape. Results are shown in Fig. 4. Over time, nosignificant loss of supporting or hair cells was detected in thedamaged ear when compared to those in the contralateral intact ear(Fig. 4A, data only shown for 2 h and 24 h post STTK). The numberof identified type II hair cells in the injured ear did not changebetween 2 h and 24 h after STTK, but, it was significantly reducedin comparison with that in the contralateral ear. Conversely, thenumber of identified type I hair cells was significantly reduced ininjured utricles 2 h after STTK, although it did not significantlydiffer from that in intact tissue 24 h after the injury. The number ofhair cells of undetermined type increased 2 h after STTK and wasstill significantly different from that in the contralateral ear 24 h afterthe injury, consistent with the significant reduction of identifiabletype I or II hair cells. Fig. 4B details the time course of the changesin the number of undetermined, type I and type II hair cells between1 and 24 h after the STTK injection. Quantification at 168 h is alsoprovided for comparison. As early as 1 h after the STTK injection,some hair cells were no longer identifiable as type I or type II haircells. At this time, the number of type II hair cells had alreadysignificantly decreased to its minimum and the number of type I haircells started to decline whereas the number of hair cells ofundetermined type conversely increased. From 2 to 12 h, a maximal

    Fig. 4. Density of hair cells and supporting cells in vestibular epitheliafollowing the excitotoxic injury. Cells were counted on transverse semi-thinsections of utricles from three different experiments for each time point. Theirdensity along a 100-µm length of epithelium is given. (A) Total numbers ofsupporting cells (Sup. cells), hair cells (total HC) and segregation betweenidentified type I (type I HC), type II (type I HC) and undetermined hair cell type(Und. HC type) were compared with contralateral sections and at 2 h (KA 2 h)and 24 h (KA 24 h) post-lesion formation. Statistical significance betweencontralateral samples and the 2 h and 24 h time points following one-wayANOVA with post-hoc analysis using the Holm–Sidak method is shown.*P≤0.05, ***P≤0.001. n.s., not significant. (B) The density of identifiable andundetermined hair cell types was analyzed from 1 h to 168 h post-lesionformation in utricles and compared to those in contralateral ears, referenced astime 0 h for statistical analysis. Significance resulting from the ANOVA testfollowed by the Holm–Sidak method is presented. *P

  • and steady quantity of hair cells of undetermined type was reached.At that time, the number of cells identified as type I hair cells wasminimal. At 12 h after the STTK injection, the number of identifiedtype I hair cells drastically and statistically increased. Conversely,the number of hair cells of undetermined type started to decline. At24 h post STTK, the quantity of hair cells exclusively identified astype I was similar to that in the contralateral non-injured ear. Boththe numbers of type II and undetermined type hair cells remainedstatistically different. One week (168 h) after the STTK injection,the numbers of identifiable type I and type II cells, and of cells ofundetermined type were similar to those in the contralateral ear.Taken together, these results demonstrate that spontaneousresorption of swollen afferent terminals occurred in the injuredvestibular epithelia after kainic acid-induced excitotoxic damagefollowing a specific time course. The resorption process resulted ina general restoration of sensory and supporting hair cellorganization. However, to determine the degree of damage and

    repair of terminal afferents at the sub-cellular level, a more preciseanalysis using electron microscopy was required.

    Repair of afferent terminals throughout the first weekfollowing excitotoxic insultAs previously stated, the overall organization of the sensoryepithelium appeared to be properly restored within the first 24 hfollowing the kainate injury when observed using light microscopyanalysis of semi-thin section preparations (see Fig. 3). However, thislevel of observation did not provide enough detail to be able toassess the precise stage of the repair at the subcellular level,particularly when substantial vestibular dysfunction persisted(Fig. 1). To address this point, we used electron microscopy toexamine the contacts between hair cells and their associated afferentterminals in rat utricles 24 h after STTK injection (Fig. 5).Compared to non-damaged tissue, most type I hair cells wereeasily identified according to their pear-shaped morphology,

    Fig. 5. Detailed morphology ofvestibular epithelia 24 h after theexcitotoxic injury. Utricles wereobserved with electron microscopy.(A) At low magnification, some type Ihair cells (I) were identified, whereasother hair cells with an undeterminedtype remained (*). Sc, supportingcells. (B-G) Nerve terminals weredetailed at higher magnification.(B) Typical ribbons (white arrow)facing postsynaptic densities onbouton afferent fibers were observed.II, type II hair cells. (C,D) Bouton-liketerminals (a) or efferent terminals (e)unusually connected some type I haircells. (E,F) Single or multiple ribbons(arrows) faced remaining pieces ofcalyceal membrane. (G) Typicalfeatures of competition betweenefferent terminals and afferent fibersto contact hair-cell-facing ribbons(arrow) were found. Scale bars:10 µm (A); 1 µm (C,D); 500 nm(B,E-G).

    1185

    RESEARCH ARTICLE Disease Models & Mechanisms (2016) 9, 1181-1192 doi:10.1242/dmm.024521

    Disea

    seModels&Mechan

    isms

  • constricted neck and the basal localization of their nuclei (Fig. 5A).Type II hair cells were often contacted by bouton afferent terminalsthat normally faced ribbons and by efferent terminals filled withsynaptic vesicles facing synaptic cisterns (Fig. 5B). No furtherswelling was observed. However, close examination of type I haircells and their associated calyx terminals revealed unusual featuresof altered contacts (Fig. 5C-G): some terminals were simply absent,whereas other terminals displayed features of immature terminals(Desmadryl and Sans, 1990). Some type I hair cells weresurrounded by fragmented calyx terminals (Fig. 5C). Single(Fig. 5E) or multiple (Fig. 5F) ribbons were found to faceremnant membranes of calyx terminals that no longer possessedany mitochondria. The most striking feature was the presence ofefferent terminals, full of vesicles with small mitochondria thatdirectly contacted the type I hair cells (Fig. 5D,G). In some cases,efferent terminals appeared to compete with afferent terminals infront of presynaptic ribbons (Fig. 5G). It is noteworthy that a similarinnervation pattern is usually observed during development(Desmadryl et al., 1992). Quantification of type I hair cells(n=117) and their calyx terminal afferents revealed that only26.33±0.85% (mean±s.e.m.) of type I hair cells were contacted byfully formed calyces 24 h after the excitotoxic injury. The otherswere contacted by either partial calyx terminals (32.60±7.44%) ornot contacted at all (41.07± 6.63%).One week after the kainic acid induction of excitotoxic damage,

    vestibular tissue was analyzed to assess the degree of completion ofthe repair process. On semi-thin sections (Fig. 6A), the grossmorphology of sensory epithelia did not significantly differ fromcontralateral non-injured ear tissue (for quantification of hair cells,see Fig. 4B). At the ultra-structural level, the detailed morphologyalso appeared normal. Type I and type II hair cells were clearlyidentifiable (Fig. 6B-C) with proper calyx (Fig. 6D) or bouton(Fig. 6E) afferent terminals connected.

    Replenishment of afferent terminals with synaptic vesiclesTo further investigate the process of hair cell re-innervationfollowing excitotoxic damage to vestibular afferents, we monitoredthe expression of synaptophysin (Fig. 7) and synapsin (Fig. 8), twoproteins associated with synaptic vesicles (Brachya et al., 2006), incristae at 2 h, 7 h, 12 h and 24 h after the STTK injection. Incontralateral non-injured sensory epithelia (Fig. 7A),immunolabeling against synaptophysin revealed dot-likestructures that were restricted to the base of the sensory cells(Fig. 7A, arrows) and the apex of the epithelia (Fig. 7A,arrowheads). This labeling matched previously describedexpression of synaptophysin in both the efferent and afferentbouton terminals, as well as at the upper portion of the calyxafferent terminals reported in the adult rodent vestibule (Dechesneet al., 1997; Sage et al., 2000; Scarfone et al., 1988, 1991). At 2 hafter the excitotoxic insult, synaptophysin expression did not differfrom the contralateral ear, except for a slight disorganization at thebase of hair cells and at the apex of calyces (Fig. 7B). The lack ofsynaptophysin expression in the conjunctive tissue underlining thecristae up to 7 h after the STTK injection is noteworthy. At 7 h afterthe excitotoxic injury, synaptophysin immunoreactivity started toappear in some afferent fibers entering the sensory epithelia as wellas in hair cells. Subsequently, immunolabeling increased duringthe proceeding hours in both the afferent terminals and in hair cells(Fig. 7D-E). Of note was the entrance of fibers that intensivelyexpressed synaptophysin 24 h after the STTK injection (Fig. 7E,open arrows). This alteration of the synaptophysin relocation andintensification confirmed the re-organization of nerve terminals,

    mimicking the processes observed during the developmentalsynaptogenesis period (Dechesne et al., 1997; Gaboyard et al.,2003; Sage et al., 2000; Scarfone et al., 1991). Synapsin expressionwas more specific to efferent terminals only in the adult vestibule,as we observed in the contralateral ear (Fig. 8A,B). Synapsinexpression was mostly restricted to dot-like structures at the base ofsensory cells that lined but clearly did not overlap or coincide withthe neurofilament staining (Fig. 8B, arrows), corresponding tolocalization of mature efferent terminals (Favre et al., 1986;Holstein et al., 2005). At 12 h after the excitotoxic damage,synapsin immunoreactivity increased in the cristae, with areorganization of efferent terminals, and expression of synapsinincreased in fibers entering the epithelia and in hair cells (Fig. 8C-F, arrowheads). A similar pattern of expression of these proteins,which are associated with synaptic vesicles, has been describedduring the process of perinatal synaptogenesis in the vestibule(Scarfone et al., 1991).

    DISCUSSIONThe present study addresses the lack of information regarding thedifferent stages and time course of damage and repair processes atinner ear nerve terminals following excitotoxic damage. Adapted tovestibular afferents, this work is crucial to understand how physicaldamage at the contact between sensory hair cells and nerveterminals arising from the primary vestibular neurons governs theheterogeneity of symptoms of vestibular disorders.

    Fig. 6. Histology of sensory epithelium 1 week after excitotoxic injury.(A) Transverse semi-thin sections of the injured utricle. At 168 h, the lesionshows a normal grossmorphologyand organization of hair cells and supportingcells, beneath the conjunctive tissue where innervating fibers were observed.(B,C) Electronmicroscopyshows thatmorphologyof type I (I) and type II (II) haircells was normal; terminal afferents are present. (D,E) At higher magnification,regular afferent terminals were observed: calyx connect type I hair cells (c),efferent terminals contact calyx afferents (e), afferent fibers are passing (a) andbouton afferent terminals (b) contact facing ribbons (white arrow) of type II haircells. Scale bars: 100 µm (A); 10 µm (B,C); 1 µm (D,E).

    1186

    RESEARCH ARTICLE Disease Models & Mechanisms (2016) 9, 1181-1192 doi:10.1242/dmm.024521

    Disea

    seModels&Mechan

    isms

  • Inducing and assessing excitotoxic damages in themammalian vestibuleThe term ototoxicity applies to specific damages induced by theapplication of different drugs to auditory or vestibular sensory cells.Vestibular hair cell loss is a typical pathophysiology induced byaminoglycosides, such as gentamicin, or nitriles such as 3,3′-iminodipropionitrle (IDPN). Recent studies have demonstrated that

    in addition to hair cell impairment, the calyx innervation of type I haircells is also altered by gentamicin or IDPN administration, suggestingthat excitotoxicity and damage to the afferents might also be involvedin the pathophysiology of drug-induced ototoxicity (Hirvonen et al.,2005; Sedo-Cabezon et al., 2015). Finally, the sole correlation betweenstructural excitotoxic damages within the vestibule and alteredvestibular behavior has rarely been studied. Excitotoxic injury ofvestibular afferents has been previously undertaken using differentdelivery methods. Surgical approaches, syringe pumps and gelfoamcontaining glutamate agonists have been used to deliver excitotoxicdrugs in the immediate proximity of the vestibule (Brugeaud et al.,2007; Liu, 1999; Shimogori and Yamashita, 2004). In comparison tothe currently used transtympanic injection, these delivery methodswere supposed to reduce the dosage and exposure time necessary forthe excitotoxic agents to have an effect.However, none of the extensivehistological damage that we observed in the present study (i.e. largevacuoles in place of afferent terminals with distortion of hair cells) hasbeen described in the previous studies. Reasons for the variableseverity of excitotoxic damages might include, firstly, a difference inthe effective dose of drug that reaches the inner ear. Liu (1999) used adirect application but of only small drops with a concentration of 10 to50 nM kainic acid. Brugeaud et al. (2007) delivered a higher dose of5 mM kainic acid but with extended diffusion over time from agelfoamplaced against the roundwindow, probably resulting in longerexposure but a lower peak dose. The time points of histologicalexploration could also have played a role in the observed degree ofdamage severity. Through their early analysis of excitotoxic damage,performed 15 min following the kainic acid application, Liu (1999)could have missed the maximum damage that we observed in thepresent study 1.5 h after the kainic acid injection. Shimogori andYamashita (2004) have investigated vestibular epithelia as late as1 week after the injury (when we generally observed completemacroscopic recovery), and the histological method used was onlylight microscopywithout the resolution necessary to precisely observesynaptic injury. One recent study using transtympanic injections ofkainic acid (Dyhrfjeld-Johnsen et al., 2013) resulted in vestibulardysfunction recorded with both behavioral testing andelectronystamography. Damaged afferents were clearly observed24 h and 48 h after the insult, but initial tissue lesions following theexcitotoxic induction during the early stages was not described.

    Regarding the behavioral assessments, the vestibular deficit inducedby Brugeaud et al. (2007) was quite similar to those we observed 48 hafter induction. However, they did not observe a pronouncedbehavioral peak crisis as we did in the present study (personalcommunication), suggesting that the delivery method might not haveinduced immediate strong lesions similar to those obtained throughtranstympanic injection. Conversely, Shimogori and Yamashita(2004) observed AMPA-induced vestibular disorders immediatelyfollowing the excitotoxic induction. They report strong spontaneousnystagmus during the first 12 h post injury that could correspond to ourinitial peak in damage at 12 h. In summary, the results of thosedifferent studies compared to present results strongly suggest that (1)selective damage to the vestibular afferents directly supports the alteredbehavior characteristics of vestibular deficit, (2) the degree of structuraldamage (severity and duration) is directly reflected by the severity ofvestibular deficit, and (3) following vestibular damage and deficit,structural repair and functional recovery occur.

    Excitotoxic features at vestibular afferents during acutepeak crisisTranstympanic injection of kainic acid induced vestibulardysfunctions corresponding to a moderate behavioral disorder

    Fig. 7. Progression of synaptophysin expression over time afterexcitotoxic injury. Immunolabeling in a transverse section of crista observedby confocal microscopy. (A) In the control ear, counter-labeling of transversesections with phalloidin (Phal, red) and antibodies against calretinin (Cal, blue)highlight hair bundles of sensory cells, and most type II hair cells and purecalyx of the central zone. Immunolabeling with antibodies againstsynaptophysin (Synapto, green and white) locates small synaptic vesicles innormal vestibular sensory epithelium. High magnification of the inset (blackand white panel) shows precisely that synaptophysin is expressed in efferentterminals (arrows) and at the top of calyces (arrowheads) in this adult tissue.(B-E) Between 2 h and 24 h after the STKK injection, gross morphology of thesensory epithelium was distorted, as evidenced by the actin labeling, andsynaptophysin expression changed. (B,C) At 2 h and 7 h, synaptophysinbecame mostly disorganized, with loss at the top of calyces. (D,E) Between12 h and 24 h, expression increased in innervating fibers within the conjunctivetissue (open arrows, C-E) and hair cells. Scale bars: 10 µm.

    1187

    RESEARCH ARTICLE Disease Models & Mechanisms (2016) 9, 1181-1192 doi:10.1242/dmm.024521

    Disea

    seModels&Mechan

    isms

  • score (Brugeaud et al., 2007; Desmadryl et al., 2012; Dyhrfjeld-Johnsen et al., 2013; Vignaux et al., 2012). We report threesequential stages, starting with a pronounced acute crisis during thetwo first hours after the insult, followed by a relatively high andstable vestibular dysfunction period lasting several hours and asubsequent slow functional recovery period that is completed withinseveral days. The acute crisis coincides with histological damagestereotypical of excitotoxicity within the vestibular end organs.Large swelling of afferent terminals that could already be observed1 h after the insult induction persisted for a 7-h period, correlatingwith the duration of the acute crisis. Such extensive swelling ofafferent terminals with hair cell distortion has been previouslydescribed in the cochlea, following noise-induced trauma or modelsof excitotoxicity with glutamate receptor agonists (Pujol and Puel,1999; Ruel et al., 2007), and in both cochlea and vestibulesfollowing ischemia (Puel et al., 1994; Sasaki et al., 2012).Furthermore, in the central nervous system, ischemia and local orsystemic injection of glutamate receptor agonists induce swelling ofafferent terminals (Nikonenko et al., 2009; Schwob et al., 1980; Sperket al., 1983). This trauma has been referred to as an early stage ofexcitotoxicity. In vivo and in vitro experiments have been used todemonstrate that this mechanism mainly depends on non-NMDAreceptors and results from massive influx of Na+, Cl− and water intothe afferent terminals (Choi, 1987; Hoyt et al., 1998). Depending onthe cause and duration of the insult, subsequent death of the injuredneurons might occur through apoptotic and necrotic pathways (Gwaget al., 1997;Koh et al., 1990;Munir et al., 1995). The balance betweenneuronal repair and neuronal death after excitotoxicity has been welldescribed in the cochlea and basilar papilla of birds using sustainedand/or higher doses of glutamate receptor agonists (Sun et al., 2001).In the present study, we show that the slow and partial functional

    recovery of balance function coincides with a subsequent stage ofretraction of the afferent terminals occurring within the first 24 hafter the excitotoxic insult. The retraction terminates either withpartial loss of the calyx apposition or with a complete ‘stripping’ of

    the hair cell basolateral membrane. Features of the retraction phaseremained visible within the epithelia up to 24 h under the presentparadigm. This retraction mechanism seems to mainly affect thedistal unmyelinated part of the nerve terminals of Scarpa’s ganglionneurons. Working on the severity of this excitotoxic model,modifying the dose and number of transtympanic administrationsof kainic acid for example, will help to answer some fundamentalquestions concerning the degree of damage and the capacity forrepair (Tos et al., 2013).

    Repair of vestibular afferent terminals mimicsdevelopmental processesIn the present study, swelling process and resorption of afferentterminals correspond to an acute episode of vestibular disorder withpronounced behavioral dysfunction. Subsequently, we observed theretraction of nerve terminals followed by the spontaneous repair ofafferent terminals that starts 12 h after the excitotoxic insult andcoincides with a slow functional recovery of the balance function.Interestingly, the step of spontaneous repair displays featurespreviously observed in mammalian vestibules during the perinatalsynaptogenesis period (Dememes et al., 2001; Desmadryl et al.,1992; Desmadryl and Sans, 1990). Competition between afferentand efferent terminals for innervation of type I hair cells, with directapposition of efferent terminals on type I hair cells, were oftenobserved. Synaptophysin and synapsin are both required forneurotransmission, and are involved in synaptogenesis andneuronal plasticity (Brachya et al., 2006; Cesca et al., 2010).During maturation of vestibular end organs, synaptophysin andsynapsin switch from a pre-synaptic and diffuse expression in haircells with post-synaptic expression along entering fibers to a preciselocation at the apex of calyces, and in afferent and efferent terminalsin adults (Dechesne et al., 1997; Favre et al., 1986; Gaboyard et al.,2003; Holstein et al., 2005; Scarfone et al., 1988, 1991). In thepresent study, expression of synaptophysin and synapsin increased12 h after the excitotoxic insult, and their expression appeared

    Fig. 8. Progression of synapsinexpression over time after excitotoxicinjury. Immunolabeling in transversesections of crista observed by performingconfocal microscopy. (A,B) In thecontralateral ear, counterlabeling oftransverse sections with phalloidin (Phal,blue) and antibodies against neurofilament200 kDa (N52, green) highlight hair bundlesof sensory cells and afferent fibers.Immunolabeling with antibodies againstsynapsin (Synapsin, red) locates smallsynaptic vesicles in normal vestibularsensory epithelium. (B) High magnificationshows precisely that synapsin is expressedin efferent terminals (arrows) contactingafferent fibers. (C,D) At 12 h after the STTKinjection, synapsin expression becamedisorganized and increased. (E,F) At 24 hafter the STTK injection, synapsin was alsoexpressed in afferent terminals(arrowheads). Scale bars: 10 µm (A,applies to C,E, and B applies to D,F).

    1188

    RESEARCH ARTICLE Disease Models & Mechanisms (2016) 9, 1181-1192 doi:10.1242/dmm.024521

    Disea

    seModels&Mechan

    isms

  • to mimic that which has been previously described duringdevelopment, with increased labeling of afferent fibers andterminals. Our observation confirmed that afferent repair thatoccurred after excitotoxic damage appeared to engage mechanismsthat are observed during the development of this sensory organ(Brugeaud et al., 2007). As supposed for other systems during repairplasticity (Hou and Dahlstrom, 2000; Marti et al., 1999), theincreased expression of synaptophysin and synapsin could reflect aprocess of replenishment of small synaptic vesicles to re-establish lostterminal contacts. Another role for the increased expression of theseproteins in calyx terminals is likely to be their participation in theprocess of membrane resealing. This mechanism, which has beenpreviously described for synaptobrevin or SNAP25 (Steinhardt et al.,1994), would indeed be a good counter measure against thedestruction of the membrane during the swelling process.Taken together, these results confirm and strengthen previous

    observations that spontaneous repair of vestibular afferent terminalsoccurs in mammalian vestibular sensory epithelia followingexcitotoxic damage (Brugeaud et al., 2007; Dyhrfjeld-Johnsenet al., 2013). The repair process follows a precise time course thathas already started 24 h after the excitotoxic injury and is completedwithin 1 week. Its sequence follows successive and identified steps:swelling, resorption and retraction of nerve terminals followed bycompetitive re-innervation and de novo formation of afferentterminals (Fig. 9). The re-innervation process mimics the processencountered during developmental synaptogenesis.

    Capacities for and limits of functional recoveryThe structural repair was accompanied by functional recovery of thevestibular behavior. As previously stated, various studies haveexplored over the last decades the mechanisms of inner ear damageand repair using different paradigms tomimic pathological conditionsin the auditory organ. Animal models of excitotoxic lesions throughlocal application of glutamate receptors agonists, noise trauma andischemia has enabled us to decipher the correlation between damageto the auditory synapses and hearing loss (for review see Pujol andPuel, 1999; Ruel et al., 2007). Spontaneous repair of afferents hasbeen reported in the cochlea, and this synaptic plasticity isaccompanied by recovery of the auditory function. Recently, therepair capacities have been challenged through strong auditory trauma

    that induces synaptopathy or neuronal death, resulting in partial butirreversible loss of auditory function (Kujawa and Liberman, 2009;Liberman and Liberman, 2015; Lin et al., 2011).

    In the vestibule, no deleterious effect of over stimulation has everbeen reported. Conversely, ischemia has been demonstrated to act asa potential source of damage (Jiang and Umemura, 1993; Kitamuraand Berreby, 1983; Nario et al., 1997; Oas and Baloh, 1992; Ritterand Veit, 1977; Rubinstein et al., 1988; Tange, 1998). Betterprotection and repair might also occur in the vestibular end organsbecause major differences in the branching patterns of connectionsexist between the sensory organs. Primary vestibular neuronsdisplay multiple connections to both type I and type II hair cells (forrecent review see Eatock and Songer, 2011), whereas cochlearprimary neurons display a single connection to only one inner haircell (for recent review, see Kujawa and Liberman, 2009). Theredundancy of connections in the vestibule might promote higherprotection than in the single-branched cochlear neurons. Theseverity of damage and the degree of fiber retraction beneath thesensory epithelium might condition the capacity of nerve fibers forregrowth and reconnection (Tos et al., 2013). In the present study,and previous ones, using the kainic acid paradigm (Brugeaud et al.,2007; Desmadryl et al., 2012; Dyhrfjeld-Johnsen et al., 2013), wedemonstrated that the severity and duration of the acute vertigo crisiscorrelate with the extent of the insult to afferent terminals. It can beassumed that too much damage and retraction of the afferentterminals compromises the capacity for repair. A massive release ofglutamate during sustained ischemia or prolonged excitotoxicconditions could cause massive synapse uncoupling andpronounced retraction that would further delay, and ultimatelyprevent, any possibility of regrowth and reconnection. Such asituation might reflect the clinical tableau sometimes encountered inhumans in cases of complete vestibular areflexia as a result ofconditions diagnosed as labyrinthitis or vestibular neuritis, or incases of cophosis encountered in sudden sensory hearing lossconditions (Moalla et al., 2007). Further quantitative analysis willbe needed to precisely establish the capacity for plasticity ofvestibular synapses exposed to different traumatic conditions. Thepresent model of kainic-acid-induced excitotoxicity might be agood starting tool for further investigation of such questions byperforming some experiments involving dose responses or modified

    Fig. 9. Illustration of the correlation between vestibular dysfunction and changes at the vestibular afferent terminals. Diagram shows the time course ofbehavioral vestibular dysfunctions induced by transtympanic injection of kainic acid (curve) and the change occurring at calyx terminals after excitotoxic injury(schematic cartoon of hair cells and afferents). The acute crisis peaking at 1.5 h followed by the progressive recovery period of the vestibular function parallels thelesion (red), terminal resorption (orange) and repair (yellow) of the afferent terminals. Replenishment of proteins associated with small synaptic vesicles is shown.

    1189

    RESEARCH ARTICLE Disease Models & Mechanisms (2016) 9, 1181-1192 doi:10.1242/dmm.024521

    Disea

    seModels&Mechan

    isms

  • durations of exposure to the glutamate agonists. Also, quantitativeassessment of the presynaptic proteins should yield information onthe state of the presynapse during the excitotoxic process.In birds, destruction of hair cells by ototoxic agents induces a

    complete regeneration of the sensory epithelia with a full set ofsensory cells and complete re-innervation (Zakir and Dickman,2006). However, the branching pattern of the regenerated synapticconnections is modified and correlates with alterations in gazeresponses (Haque et al., 2009). In response to peripheral impairmentof the vestibule, such as rebranching, re-innnervation or destruction,a central compensatory mechanism restores balance function (Yuet al., 2014). One can ask how a central nervous system mechanismis executed to support vestibular compensation during this shortperiod of lesion and repair. This central process has to deal with andbalance both the early stages of the insult, inducing a strongalteration of the peripheral information, and the subsequent andprogressive spontaneous restoration of the peripheral vestibularafferents, re-introducing a modified sensory signal. A betterunderstanding of what happens in terms of reactionalrecomposition within the brain stem vestibular nuclei, dependingon the type of peripheral damage, will probably provide answers tothis question (Lacour et al., 2009).In conclusion, this study provides, for the first time, precise

    information on the sequence of the early events that occur followingan excitotoxic insult within the vestibular end organs. We havedetailed the structural changes that occur at vestibular afferentterminals and their correlation with symptoms of vestibulardysfunction. Going further will require identifying the molecularactors involved and determining the correlation between the severityof the insult and spontaneous repair capacities. This information is aprerequisite for further development of targeted pharmacologicalapproaches to efficiently protect vestibular afferent terminals and/orpromote their regeneration.

    MATERIAL AND METHODSAnimalsExperiments used adult female Wistar rats (2 months of age, 200-224 g;CERJ, Le Genest, France) in accordance with the French Ministry ofAgriculture regulations and European Community Council Directive no. 86/609/EEC, OJL 358.

    Unilateral vestibular excitotoxic insultUsing a surgical microscope, single transtympanic injection of the glutamatereceptor agonist kainic acid (referred as STTK, 12.5 mM, 100 µl; AscentScientific, Bristol, UK; n=29) was performed under isoflurane anesthesiaaccording to the procedure previously detailed (Dyhrfjeld-Johnsen et al.,2013). In summary, rats were anesthetized with isoflurane and kept in alateral position. Applying traction to the auricle, the posterior portion of thetympanic membrane was penetrated with a sterile insulin syringe(0.33×12.7 mm or 0.5×16 mm). Kainic acid, dissolved in 100 µl of saline,was slowly injected into the middle ear cavity. After injection, the animalwas kept in a lateral position for 10-15 min under isoflurane anesthesia, andobserved until it had recovered from the anesthesia.

    Control animals (n=8) were also subjected to transtympanic injection intothe right middle ear of only saline solution.

    Behavioral experimentsA vestibular dysfunction score was determined as previously described(Boadas-Vaello et al., 2005; Brugeaud et al., 2007). Altered vestibularbehaviors were scored on a scale from 0 to 4, ranging from normal behavior(rating 0) to maximal identified vestibular impairment (rating 4). Table S1describes the observed behavior and associated criteria used to score thevestibular dysfunction (normal=0; mild deficit=2; maximal and severedysfunction=4). The six different tests were sequentially scored and summed

    to rate the vestibular dysfunction: 1, head bobbing (abnormal intermittentbackward extension of the neck); 2, circling (stereotyped movement rangingfrom none to compulsive circles around the hips of the animal); 3, retro-pulsion (typical backward walk reflecting vestibular disturbance); 4,tail-hanging reflex (normally induces a forelimb extension to reach theground, unilateral dysfunction results in axial rotation of the body); 5, contact-inhibition reflex (normally leads animal to release hold grip onmetal grid in asupine position when their back touch the ground; in case of vestibulardysfunction with lack of full body orientation reference, animal retains grip onthe grid in a supine position); 6, air-righting reflex (necessary for rats to landon all four feet when falling from a supine position; vestibular dysfunctionimpairs normal body repositioning with a maximal dysfunction leading theanimal to land on its back when dropped from a height of 40 cm onto a foamcushion). Rats were scored for vestibular dysfunctions just before the STTKinjection and evaluated 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 5, 7, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 168 h after theinjection (Fig. 1). Scores were expressed as mean±s.e.m.

    Tissue preparation for histologyAnimals were deeply anesthetized with pentobarbital (100 mg/kg), thenperfused transcardially with heparin PBS (0.01 M) followed by a fixativesolution (2% paraformaldehyde, 2.5% glutaraldehyde, 1% picric acid, with5% sucrose for light and electron microscopy; 4% paraformaldehyde, 1%picric acid, with 5% sucrose for immunolabeling). Temporal bones werepostfixed in the same solution before vestibular epithelia were dissected inPBS. Tissue from the right injected ear and control naive left ear werecarefully identified and segregated.

    Light and electron microscopyWhole fixed vestibular organs from animals perfused at 2, 5, 7, 12, 24or 168 h after the STTK injection were postfixed in 0.5% OsO4,dehydrated and embedded in Araldite. For light microscopy analysis,semi-thin (1 µm) sections were systematically cut with an ultra-microtome(Ultracut, Reichert-Jung). To quantify hair cells within utricles andensure comparative unbiased counts between the different time points, wedetermined a pre-established pattern for sectioning and sampling. Sensoryepithelia were embedded in resin with a longitudinal alignment to obtaintransverse sections from the first-third part of the utricle following an antero-posterior orientation (Desai et al., 2005b). Transverse semi-thin sectionswere then cut within each sample. When hair cells were first observed insections, 100 µm of epithelium was cut before collection for quantification.Then, five sets of three serial sections were collected, each set was separatedby 25 µm. Semi-thin sections were Toluidine-Blue stained, mounted onslides and scanned using the Nanozoomer slide scanner (objective 40×;Hamamatsu, Japan). For electron microscopy analysis, ultra-thin sections(80-90 nm) were cut at 2, 24 and 168 h post STTK. Five sections were cutand collected after each set of semi-thin sections. They were stained withuranyl acetate, then viewed and digitalized in a Hitashi H7100 microscope.

    MorphometryFor quantification of hair cells and supporting cells within utricles,Metamorph software (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) was used andcells were manually counted on semi-thin sections. Collection of sectionsstarting 100 µm from the anterior edge of the sensory epithelium ensured asampling of a transverse section composed of both a striolar and extrastriolarregion (Desai et al., 2005b). The 25-µm spacing between each set preventedcounting of the same hair cell twice in two distinct sets of serial sections(mean hair cell width=10 µm, calculated from Desai et al., 2005b). Threeserial sections were collected for each set of transverse sections ofepithelium to ensure acquisition of one full section per set suitable forquantification. For each utricle, three sections collected from three differentsets were quantified. Thus, a snap shot of around 400 hair cells, sampledwithin the first third of each utricle and coming from both striolar andextrastriolar regions, were counted for each time point from three differentanimals. Counts from the contralateral ears were pooled as control. Cellswere classified based on morphological criteria; cell shape and positionof the nucleus were the main ones. The following classifications were used:(1) type I hair cell, when a pear-shaped hair cell was observed with basalnucleus localization; (2) type II hair cell, when an elongated hair cell with a

    1190

    RESEARCH ARTICLE Disease Models & Mechanisms (2016) 9, 1181-1192 doi:10.1242/dmm.024521

    Disea

    seModels&Mechan

    isms

    http://dmm.biologists.org/lookup/doi/10.1242/dmm.024521.supplemental

  • nucleus positioned high in the cell was observed; (3) undetermined hair celltype, when the swollen terminal around the cell prevented determination ofthe cell type based on its shape, or when an elongated cell had a nucleus in amore basal position; and (4) supporting cells, forming the basal part of theepithelium. Note that calyx innervation is a classic criterion used to identifytype I hair cells; however, our observations at this magnification preventedclear-cut identification of afferent terminals. Thus, we preferred avoiding thepresence of calyx innervation as an identification criterion and only used itas a confirmatory criterion for hair cell type I classification when it wasdefinitely observed. The number of counted cells was standardized to thelength of the analyzed transverse section.

    For quantification with electron microscopy, the aim was to quantify typeI hair cells and their afferent terminals. Thus, only hair cells identified astype I (n=117) by their pear shape and low-level nucleus were analyzed onultra-thin sections from three different animals fixed 24 h after STTK.Quantification was performed on three ultra-thin sections collected fromthree different sets to obtain a snapshot of type I hair cells and calyxinnervation from striolar and extrastriolar regions without overlappedcounts. They were categorized and counted depending on the state of theircalyx afferent innervation: (1) full if reaching their neck, (2) partial if presentbut not fully formed and (3) absent if lacking.

    Statistical analysisSigmaPlot Software (Systat Software, Chicago, IL) was used to performappropriate statistical tests. For behavioral scoring, Friedman repeatedmeasures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA) was followed by Dunn’smethod to analyze the vestibular dysfunction over time after kainic acidinjury. For comparison to saline control animals, the Mann–Whitney RankSum Test was used. For histological analysis, one-way analysis of variance(one-way ANOVA) was followed by the Holm–Sidak method to determinesignificant differences in cell counts for the different time points.Comparisons over time, with contralateral ears referenced as time 0 h,were performed from 0 h to 168 h for each type of hair cell.

    ImmunochemistryVestibular end organs from animals perfused at 2, 7, 12 or 24 h after theSTTK injection were embedded in 4% agarose, and 40-μm-thick sectionswere cut with a vibratome instrument (HM650V,Microm). The free-floatingsections were first permeabilized with 4% Triton X-100; non-specificbinding was prevented by a pre-incubation step in a blocking solution of0.5% fish gelatin, 0.5% Triton X-100 and 1% BSA. Samples were thenincubated with primary antibodies diluted in the blocking solution. Forcontrol experiments, the investigated primary antibody was omitted whilethe following procedures were unchanged. Specific labeling was revealedwith fluorescent secondary antibodies (1:200) in the blocking solution andcombined with actin staining with Alexa-Fluor-594- or Alexa-Fluor-647-conjugated phalloidin (Fisher Scientific, Illkirch, France). Samples wereobserved with a laser scanning confocal microscope (LSM 5 LIVE DUO,Zeiss). Final image processing was performed with Adobe Photoshopsoftware (San Jose, CA). Control reactions were observed and processedwith the parameters used for the stained sections.

    AntibodiesTwo different combinations of primary antibodieswere used. Antibodieswereused as cellular markers. In control ears, they revealed the expected cellularmorphology and distribution, as demonstrated in previous publications.Table S2 provides details and the appropriate references. The first combinationincluded the mouse monoclonal anti-synaptophysin antibody and the anti-calretinin goat serum. Synaptophysin is a protein expressed in small synapticvesicles in efferent terminals, and at the top of calyx afferent terminals, andcalretinin is a cytoplasmic Ca2+-binding protein expressed in most type II haircells and pure calyx. In vestibular epithelia of adult rodents, calretininspecifically localizes at type II hair cells and some calyx nerve fibers andendings. This particular population of calretinin expressing calyces isrestricted to the striolar zone of maculae and the central zone of cristae. Thispopulation is identified as the purely calyx one, which corresponds to onlycalyx units without bouton branching, like dimorphic afferent fibers (Desaiet al., 2005a,b; Desmadryl and Dechesne, 1992). The other combination

    involved an anti-synapsin rabbit serum, recognizing the synapsinphosphoprotein expressed in synaptic vesicles of efferent terminals, and themouse monoclonal anti-neurofilament-200-kDa, recognizing neuronalintermediate filaments of the cytoskeleton of afferent fibers. Fluorescentsecondary antibodies used were donkey sera conjugated to Alexa-Fluor-488-,Alexa-Fluor-594- and Alexa-Fluor-647-conjugated anti-mouse, anti-rabbitand anti-goat IgG, respectively (1:700, Fisher Scientific).

    This article is part of a special subject collection ‘Spotlight on Rat: TranslationalImpact’, guest edited by Tim Aitman and Aron Geurts. See related articles in thiscollection at http://dmm.biologists.org/collection/rat-disease-model.

    AcknowledgementsWe thank technical services for tissue preparation (RHEM INM, Montpellier,France), for assistance with imaging and morphometric analysis (MRI INM,Montpellier, France) and for assistance with electron microscopy analysis (CRIC,Montpellier, France).We are grateful to Drs. Gilles Desmadryl and EricWersinger forscientific discussion and critical reading of the manuscript.

    Competing interestsA.S., A. Broussy, A. Brugeaud and S.G.-N. work for Sensorion, a biopharmaceuticalcompany committed to finding treatments for inner ear disease. C.C. and S.G-N.have shares in the company.

    Author contributionsC.T., A.S., A. Broussy, A. Brugeaud and S.G.-N. performed the experiments.S.G.-N. and C.C. analyzed the data, conceived and directed the project, and wrotethe paper. All authors edited the manuscript prior to submission.

    FundingThis work has been carried out thanks to the support of a Institut National de la Santéet de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) POC maturation grant [RSE09037FSA];and the Aix-Marseille Initiative of Excellence (A*MIDEX) project [ANR-11-IDEX-0001-02] funded by the Investissements d’Avenir French Government program,managed by Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR).

    Supplementary informationSupplementary information available online athttp://dmm.biologists.org/lookup/doi/10.1242/dmm.024521.supplemental

    ReferencesBoadas-Vaello, P., Riera, J. and Llorens, J. (2005). Behavioral and pathological

    effects in the rat define two groups of neurotoxic nitriles. Toxicol. Sci. 88, 456-466.Brachya, G., Yanay, C. and Linial, M. (2006). Synaptic proteins as multi-sensor

    devices of neurotransmission. BMC Neurosci. 7 Suppl. 1, S4.Brandt, T., Zwergal, A. and Strupp, M. (2009). Medical treatment of vestibular

    disorders. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 10, 1537-1548.Brugeaud, A., Travo, C., Dememes, D., Lenoir, M., Llorens, J., Puel, J.-L. and

    Chabbert, C. (2007). Control of hair cell excitability by vestibular primary sensoryneurons. J. Neurosci. 27, 3503-3511.

    Cesca, F., Baldelli, P., Valtorta, F. and Benfenati, F. (2010). The synapsins: keyactors of synapse function and plasticity. Prog. Neurobiol. 91, 313-348.

    Chabbert, C. (2013). New insights into vestibular neuropharmacology: from benchto bedside. J. Vestib. Res. 23, 107-111.

    Choi, D. W. (1987). Ionic dependence of glutamate neurotoxicity. J. Neurosci. 7,369-379.

    Curthoys, I. S. and Halmagyi, G. M. (1995). Vestibular compensation: a review ofthe oculomotor, neural, and clinical consequences of unilateral vestibular loss.J. Vestib. Res. 5, 67-107.

    Dechesne, C. J., Kauff, C., Stettler, O. and Tavitian, B. (1997). Rab3Aimmunolocalization in the mammalian vestibular end-organs duringdevelopment and comparison with synaptophysin expression. Brain Res. Dev.Brain Res. 99, 103-111.

    Dememes, D., Dechesne, C. J., Venteo, S., Gaven, F. and Raymond, J. (2001).Development of the rat efferent vestibular system on the ground and inmicrogravity. Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res. 128, 35-44.

    Desai, S. S., Ali, H. and Lysakowski, A. (2005a). Comparative morphology ofrodent vestibular periphery. II. Cristae ampullares. J. Neurophysiol. 93, 267-280.

    Desai, S. S., Zeh, C. and Lysakowski, A. (2005b). Comparative morphology ofrodent vestibular periphery. I. Saccular and utricular maculae. J. Neurophysiol. 93,251-266.

    Desmadryl, G. and Dechesne, C. J. (1992). Calretinin immunoreactivity inchinchilla and guinea pig vestibular end organs characterizes the calyx unitsubpopulation. Exp. Brain Res. 89, 105-108.

    Desmadryl, G. and Sans, A. (1990). Afferent innervation patterns in crista ampullarisof the mouse during ontogenesis. Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res. 52, 183-189.

    1191

    RESEARCH ARTICLE Disease Models & Mechanisms (2016) 9, 1181-1192 doi:10.1242/dmm.024521

    Disea

    seModels&Mechan

    isms

    http://dmm.biologists.org/lookup/doi/10.1242/dmm.024521.supplementalhttp://dmm.biologists.org/collection/rat-disease-modelhttp://dmm.biologists.org/lookup/doi/10.1242/dmm.024521.supplementalhttp://dmm.biologists.org/lookup/doi/10.1242/dmm.024521.supplementalhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfi314http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfi314http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-7-S1-S4http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-7-S1-S4http://dx.doi.org/10.1517/14656560902976879http://dx.doi.org/10.1517/14656560902976879http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5185-06.2007http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5185-06.2007http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5185-06.2007http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.04.006http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.04.006http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/VES-130495http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/VES-130495http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0957-4271(94)00026-Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0957-4271(94)00026-Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0957-4271(94)00026-Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-3806(96)00216-7http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-3806(96)00216-7http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-3806(96)00216-7http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-3806(96)00216-7http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-3806(01)00146-8http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-3806(01)00146-8http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-3806(01)00146-8http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00747.2003http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00747.2003http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00746.2003http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00746.2003http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00746.2003http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00229006http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00229006http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00229006http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-3806(90)90234-Phttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-3806(90)90234-P

  • Desmadryl, G., Dechesne, C. J. and Raymond, J. (1992). Recent aspects ofdevelopment of the vestibular sense organs and their innervation. InDevelopmentof Auditory and Vestibular Systems, Vol. 2 (ed. Romand), pp. 461-482. ElsevierScientific.

    Desmadryl, G., Gaboyard-Niay, S., Brugeaud, A., Travo, C., Broussy, A.,Saleur, A., Dyhrfjeld-Johnsen, J., Wersinger, E. and Chabbert, C. (2012).Histamine H4 receptor antagonists as potent modulators of mammalian vestibularprimary neuron excitability. Br. J. Pharmacol. 167, 905-916.

    Dieringer, N. (1995). ‘Vestibular compensation’: neural plasticity and its relations tofunctional recovery after labyrinthine lesions in frogs and other vertebrates. Prog.Neurobiol. 46, 97-129.

    Dyhrfjeld-Johnsen, J., Gaboyard-Niay, S., Broussy, A., Saleur, A., Brugeaud,A. and Chabbert, C. (2013). Ondansetron reduces lasting vestibular deficits in amodel of severe peripheral excitotoxic injury. J. Vestib. Res. 23, 177-186.

    Eatock, R. A. and Songer, J. E. (2011). Vestibular hair cells and afferents: twochannels for head motion signals. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 34, 501-534.

    Favre, D., Scarfone, E., Di Gioia, G., De Camilli, P. and Dememes, D. (1986).Presence of synapsin I in afferent and efferent nerve endings of vestibular sensoryepithelia. Brain Res. 384, 379-382.

    Foster, C. A. and Breeze, R. E. (2013). The Meniere attack: an ischemia/reperfusiondisorder of inner ear sensory tissues. Med. Hypotheses 81, 1108-1115.

    Gaboyard, S., Sans, A. and Lehouelleur, J. (2003). Differential impact ofhypergravity on maturating innervation in vestibular epithelia during ratdevelopment. Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res. 143, 15-23.

    Gwag, B. J., Koh, J. Y., DeMaro, J. A., Ying, H. S., Jacquin, M. and Choi, D. W.(1997). Slowly triggered excitotoxicity occurs by necrosis in cortical cultures.Neuroscience 77, 393-401.

    Haque,A., Zakir,M. andDickman, J.D. (2009).Regenerationof vestibular horizontalsemicircular canal afferents in pigeons. J. Neurophysiol. 102, 1274-1286.

    Hirvonen, T. P., Minor, L. B., Hullar, T. E. and Carey, J. P. (2005). Effects ofintratympanic gentamicin on vestibular afferents and hair cells in the chinchilla.J. Neurophysiol. 93, 643-655.

    Holstein, G. R., Martinelli, G. P., Nicolae, R. A., Rosenthal, T. M. and Friedrich,V. L., Jr. (2005). Synapsin-like immunoreactivity is present in hair cells andefferent terminals of the toadfish crista ampullaris. Exp. Brain Res. 162, 287-292.

    Hou, X.-E. and Dahlstrom, A. (2000). Synaptic vesicle proteins and neuronalplasticity in adrenergic neurons. Neurochem. Res. 25, 1275-1300.

    Hoyt, K. R., Stout, A. K., Cardman, J. M. and Reynolds, I. J. (1998). The role ofintracellular Na+ andmitochondria in buffering of kainate-induced intracellular freeCa2+ changes in rat forebrain neurones. J. Physiol. 509, 103-116.

    Iadecola, C. and Anrather, J. (2011). The immunology of stroke: frommechanismsto translation. Nat. Med. 17, 796-808.

    Jiang, X. and Umemura, K. (1993). [Functional and pathohistologic changes in anischemic model of rat inner ear]. Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho 96, 1926-1932.

    Kitamura, K. and Berreby, M. (1983). Temporal bone histopathology associatedwith occlusion of vertebrobasilar arteries. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 92, 33-38.

    Koh, J. Y., Goldberg, M. P., Hartley, D. M. and Choi, D. W. (1990). Non-NMDAreceptor-mediated neurotoxicity in cortical culture. J. Neurosci. 10, 693-705.

    Kujawa, S. G. and Liberman, M. C. (2009). Adding insult to injury: cochlear nervedegeneration after “temporary” noise-induced hearing loss. J. Neurosci. 29,14077-14085.

    Lacour, M., Dutheil, S., Tighilet, B., Lopez, C. and Borel, L. (2009). Tell me yourvestibular deficit, and i’ll tell you how you’ll compensate. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.1164, 268-278.

    Liberman, L. D. and Liberman, M. C. (2015). Dynamics of cochlear synaptopathyafter acoustic overexposure. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 16, 205-219.

    Lin, H. W., Furman, A. C., Kujawa, S. G. and Liberman, M. C. (2011). Primaryneural degeneration in the Guinea pig cochlea after reversible noise-inducedthreshold shift. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 12, 605-616.

    Liu, T. C. (1999). The effects of kainic acid on the Vestibular ganglion cells.Neurosci. Res. Commun. 24, 8.

    Llorens, J. and Rodriguez-Farre, E. (1997). Comparison of behavioral, vestibular,andaxonal effects of subchronic IDPN in the rat.Neurotoxicol. Teratol.19, 117-127.

    Llorens, J., Dememes, D. and Sans, A. (1993). The behavioral syndrome causedby 3,3′-iminodipropionitrile and related nitriles in the rat is associated withdegeneration of the vestibular sensory hair cells. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 123,199-210.

    Marti, E., Ferrer, I. and Blasi, J. (1999). Transient increase of synapsin-Iimmunoreactivity in the mossy fiber layer of the hippocampus after transientforebrain ischemia in the mongolian gerbil. Brain Res. 824, 153-160.

    Moalla, J., Mnejja, M., Hasnaoui, M., Fakhfekh, W., Chakroun, W., Charfeddine,I. and Ghorbel, A. (2007). Les Surdites Brusques Idiopathiques FacteursPronostiques. J. Tunisien d’ORL Chir. Cervico-Fac. 18, 7-11.

    Munir, M., Lu, L. and McGonigle, P. (1995). Excitotoxic cell death and delayedrescue in human neurons derived from NT2 cells. J. Neurosci. 15, 7847-7860.

    Nario, K., Matsunaga, T., Inui, H., Murai, T. and Miyahara, H. (1997). ABRfindings, electrocochleograms and caloric tests in vertebrobasilar ischemic rats.Acta Otolaryngol. Suppl. 528, 63-66.

    Nikonenko, A.G., Radenovic, L., Andjus, P. R. andSkibo, G.G. (2009). Structuralfeatures of ischemic damage in the hippocampus. Anat. Rec. 292, 1914-1921.

    Oas, J. G. andBaloh, R.W. (1992). Vertigo and the anterior inferior cerebellar arterysyndrome. Neurology 42, 2274-2279.

    Olney, J. W. (1969). Brain lesions, obesity, and other disturbances in mice treatedwith monosodium glutamate. Science 164, 719-721.

    Puel, J.-L., Pujol, R., Tribillac, F., Ladrech, F. and Eybalin, M. (1994). Excitatoryamino acid antagonists protect cochlear auditory neurons from excitotoxicity.J. Comp. Neurol. 341, 241-256.

    Puel, J. L., Saffiedine, S., Gervais d’Aldin, C., Eybalin, M. and Pujol, R. (1995).Synaptic regeneration and functional recovery after excitotoxic injury in the guineapig cochlea. C. R. Acad. Sci. III 318, 67-75.

    Puel, J.-L., Ruel, J., Gervais d’Aldin, C. and Pujol, R. (1998). Excitotoxicity andrepair of cochlear synapses after noise-trauma induced hearing loss. Neuroreport9, 2109-2114.

    Pujol, R. and Puel, J. L. (1999). Excitotoxicity, synaptic repair, and functionalrecovery in the mammalian cochlea: a review of recent findings. Ann. N. Y. Acad.Sci. 884, 249-254.

    Ritter, K. and Veit, C. (1977). [The apoplexy of the labyrinth (author’s transl)].Laryngol. Rhinol. Otol. 56, 346-350.

    Rubinstein, M., Hildesheimer, M. and Muchnik, C. (1988). Chronic labyrinthineischemia. J. Laryngol. Otol. 102, 496-499.

    Ruel, J., Wang, J., Rebillard, G., Eybalin, M., Lloyd, R., Pujol, R. and Puel, J.-L.(2007). Physiology, pharmacology and plasticity at the inner hair cell synapticcomplex. Hear. Res. 227, 19-27.

    Sage, C., Venteo, S., Jeromin, A., Roder, J. and Dechesne, C. J. (2000).Distribution of frequenin in the mouse inner ear during development, comparisonwith other calcium-binding proteins and synaptophysin. Hear. Res. 150, 70-82.

    Sasaki, A., Matsubara, A., Tabuchi, K., Hara, A., Namba, A., Yamamoto, Y. andShinkawa, H. (2012). Immunoelectron microscopic analysis of neurotoxic effectof glutamate in the vestibular end organs during ischemia. Acta Otolaryngol. 132,686-692.

    Scarfone, E., Dememes, D., Jahn, R., De Camilli, P. and Sans, A. (1988).Secretory function of the vestibular nerve calyx suggested by presence ofvesicles, synapsin I, and synaptophysin. J. Neurosci. 8, 4640-4645.

    Scarfone, E., Dememes, D. and Sans, A. (1991). Synapsin I and Synaptophysinexpression during ontogenesis of the mouse peripheral vestibular system.J. Neurosci. 11, 1173-1181.

    Schwob, J. E., Fuller, T., Price, J. L. andOlney, J. W. (1980). Widespread patternsof neuronal damage following systemic or intracerebral injections of kainic acid: ahistological study. Neuroscience 5, 991-1014.

    Sedo-Cabezon, L., Jedynak, P., Boadas-Vaello, P. and Llorens, J. (2015).Transient alteration of the vestibular calyceal junction and synapse in response tochronic ototoxic insult in rats. Dis. Model. Mech. 8, 1323-1337.

    Shimogori, H. and Yamashita, H. (2004). Peripheral vestibular disorder induced by(+/-)-alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-isoxazole-4-propionic acid (AMPA).Neurosci. Lett. 371, 69-72.

    Soto, E. and Vega, R. (2010). Neuropharmacology of vestibular system disorders.Curr. Neuropharmacol. 8, 26-40.

    Sperk, G., Lassmann, H., Baran, H., Kish, S. J., Seitelberger, F. andHornykiewicz, O. (1983). Kainic acid induced seizures: neurochemical andhistopathological changes. Neuroscience 10, 1301-1315.

    Steinhardt, R. A., Bi, G. and Alderton, J. M. (1994). Cell membrane resealing by avesicular mechanism similar to neurotransmitter release. Science 263, 390-393.

    Sun, H., Hashino, E., Ding, D.-L. and Salvi, R. J. (2001). Reversible andirreversible damage to cochlear afferent neurons by kainic acid excitotoxicity.J. Comp. Neurol. 430, 172-181.

    Tabuchi, K., Tsuji, S., Fujihira, K., Oikawa, K., Hara, A. and Kusakari, J. (2002).Outer hair cells functionally and structurally deteriorate during reperfusion. Hear.Res. 173, 153-163.

    Tange, R. A. (1998). Vascular inner ear partition: a concept for some forms ofsensorineural hearing loss and vertigo.ORL J. Otorhinolaryngol. Relat. Spec. 60,78-84.

    Tos, P., Ronchi, G., Geuna, S. and Battiston, B. (2013). Future perspectives innerve repair and regeneration. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 109, 165-192.

    Travo, C., Gaboyard-Niay, S. and Chabbert, C. (2012). Plasticity of Scarpa’sganglion neurons as a possible basis for functional restoration within vestibularendorgans. Front. Neurol. 3, 91.

    van de Heyning, P., Muehlmeier, G., Cox, T., Lisowska, G., Maier, H., Morawski,K. and Meyer, T. (2014). Efficacy and safety of AM-101 in the treatment of acuteinner ear tinnitus–a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase II study.Otol. Neurotol. 35, 589-597.

    Vignaux, G., Chabbert, C., Gaboyard-Niay, S., Travo, C., Machado, M. L.,Denise, P., Comoz, F., Hitier, M., Landemore, G., Philoxene, B. et al. (2011).Evaluation of the chemical model of vestibular lesions induced by arsanilate inrats. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 258, 61-71.

    Yu, X.-J., Thomassen, J. S., Dickman, J. D., Newlands, S. D. and Angelaki, D. E.(2014). Long-term deficits in motion detection thresholds and spike countvariability after unilateral vestibular lesion. J. Neurophysiol. 112, 870-889.

    Zakir, M. and Dickman, J. D. (2006). Regeneration of vestibular otolith afferentsafter ototoxic damage. J. Neurosci. 26, 2881-2893.

    1192

    RESEARCH ARTICLE Disease Models & Mechanisms (2016) 9, 1181-1192 doi:10.1242/dmm.024521

    Disea

    seModels&Mechan

    isms

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.02049.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.02049.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.02049.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.02049.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0301-0082(95)80009-whttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0301-0082(95)80009-whttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0301-0082(95)80009-whttp://dx.doi.org/10.3233/VES-130483http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/VES-130483http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/VES-130483http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-061010-113710http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-061010-113710http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(86)91176-5http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(86)91176-5http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(86)91176-5http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2013.10.015http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2013.10.015http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-3806(03)00069-5http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-3806(03)00069-5http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-3806(03)00069-5http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4522(96)00473-3http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4522(96)00473-3http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4522(96)00473-3http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.91000.2008http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.91000.2008http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00160.2004http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00160.2004http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00160.2004http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-004-2194-5http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-004-2194-5http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-004-2194-5http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1007600313865http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1007600313865http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.103bo.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.103bo.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.103bo.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nm.2399http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nm.2399http://dx.doi.org/10.3950/jibiinkoka.96.1926http://dx.doi.org/10.3950/jibiinkoka.96.1926http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000348948309200108http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000348948309200108http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2845-09.2009http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2845-09.2009http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2845-09.2009http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2008.03731.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2008.03731.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2008.03731.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-015-0510-3http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-015-0510-3http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-011-0277-0http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-011-0277-0http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-011-0277-0http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6769(199903/04)24:2