Upload
dalia
View
36
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Costs of EU Accession: The Potential Impact On the Turkish Banking Sector. Dr. Ceyla Pazarbasioglu Vice President. “Strong Banking Sector, Strong Economy”. Outline. Structure of the banking sector and the impact of the crisis Restructuring strategy and results - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Costs of EU Accession:Costs of EU Accession:The Potential Impact On the The Potential Impact On the
Turkish Banking SectorTurkish Banking Sector
“ “Strong Banking Sector, Strong Strong Banking Sector, Strong Economy”Economy”
Dr. Ceyla PazarbasiogluDr. Ceyla Pazarbasioglu
Vice PresidentVice President
2
““Strong Banking Sector, Strong Strong Banking Sector, Strong
EconomyEconomy””
OutlineOutline
Structure of the banking sector and the Structure of the banking sector and the impact of the crisisimpact of the crisis
Restructuring strategy and resultsRestructuring strategy and results Restructuring of the state banksRestructuring of the state banks Resolution of the SDIF banksResolution of the SDIF banks Strengthening of the private banksStrengthening of the private banks Improving the regulatory and supervisory Improving the regulatory and supervisory
frameworkframework A comparison of the Turkish and EU banksA comparison of the Turkish and EU banks Foreign bank entry and impact on Foreign bank entry and impact on
competitioncompetition Compliance with the EU Banking LegislationCompliance with the EU Banking Legislation
3
““Strong Banking Sector, Strong Strong Banking Sector, Strong
EconomyEconomy””
Pre-crisis structural problemsPre-crisis structural problems Small scale and segmented market Small scale and segmented market
structurestructure19198080 19199090 19991999 20002000
Commercial Commercial BanksBanks
3131 5454 6262 6161
State State 88 77 44 44
PrivatePrivate 1919 2525 3131 2828
ForeignForeign 44 2222 1919 1818
SDIFSDIF -- -- 88 1111
InvestInvest. &. & Dev Dev.. BanksBanks 66 1100 1919 1818
State State 44 33 33 33
PrivatePrivate 22 44 1313 1212
ForeignForeign -- 33 33 33
TOTALTOTAL 3737 6464 8181 7979
4
““Strong Banking Sector, Strong Strong Banking Sector, Strong
EconomyEconomy””
Large FX open positions of Large FX open positions of private banksprivate banks
-10674
-8960
-2056-1487
-991
-1
-341 -454 -114
152
-954 -1049
140 110 321 -86 -334 -394252 122
-12000
-10000
-8000
-6000
-4000
-2000
0
2000N
ov. 0
0
Feb
. 01
June
01
Dec
. 01
Mar
ch 0
2
June
02
aug.
02
Dec
. 02
Jan.
03
Mar
ch 0
3
On-balance sheet positions Net Position
Crisis
5
““Strong Banking Sector, Strong Strong Banking Sector, Strong
EconomyEconomy””
Crowding out by Crowding out by governmentgovernment
Note: 2001 and 2002 data reflect the results of the three-stage audit process and are inflation-adjusted.
6,410,3 10,6
21,4
35,0
40,8
53,7
47,042,5
30,6
20,022,8
05
1015202530354045505560
1980 1990 1995 2000 2001 2002
Per
cent
age
Securities / T. Assets Loans / T.Assets
6
““Strong Banking Sector, Strong Strong Banking Sector, Strong
EconomyEconomy””
Summing up: Pre-crisis Summing up: Pre-crisis conditionsconditions
BanksBanks Liquidity problemsLiquidity problems State banks with over-night liabilities of $14 State banks with over-night liabilities of $14
billionbillion Large open positions of the private banksLarge open positions of the private banks Significant share of holdings of government debtSignificant share of holdings of government debt Low asset qualityLow asset quality Inadequate risk assessment and management Inadequate risk assessment and management
systemssystems Lack of good corporate governanceLack of good corporate governance
Operating EnvironmentOperating Environment Major macroeconomic instabilityMajor macroeconomic instability High public sector deficitHigh public sector deficit Systemic distortions created by state and weak Systemic distortions created by state and weak
banksbanks
7
““Strong Banking Sector, Strong Strong Banking Sector, Strong
EconomyEconomy””
Banking and Currency CrisesBanking and Currency Crises
Sharp Sharp increaseincrease in in
interest ratesinterest rates
Sharp depreciationSharp depreciation of of
the Turkish Lirathe Turkish Lira
ContractionContraction in economic in economic
activityactivity
Maturity mismatch Maturity mismatch funding lossesfunding losses
Decline in the value of Decline in the value of securities portfoliosecurities portfolio
Short-positionsShort-positionsFX FX losseslosses
Asset QualityAsset Quality Credit RiskCredit Risk
Result:Result:
Erosion in Capital BaseErosion in Capital Base
Macroeconomic Shocks Impact on the
Banking Sector
8
““Strong Banking Sector, Strong Strong Banking Sector, Strong
EconomyEconomy””
Banking System Restructuring Banking System Restructuring ProgramProgram announced on May 15, announced on May 15, 20012001 Objective is to Objective is to eeliminate liminate distortions in distortions in the the financial sector financial sector and adopt regulations and adopt regulations to pto promotromotee an efficient, globally competitive an efficient, globally competitive and sound banking sectorand sound banking sector RRestructuring of the state banksestructuring of the state banks Resolution of Resolution of the the SDIF banksSDIF banks SStrengthening of trengthening of tthe private bankshe private banks Improving the Improving the regulatory regulatory and and supervisory supervisory frameworkframework
4 Main Pillars4 Main Pillars
But crises also provide But crises also provide opportunitiesopportunities
for major restructuring for major restructuring
Banking Sector
Restructuring Program
State Bank Reform
Strong Capital BaseCost Efficiency
•Structural Reform•Macroeconomic Stability•Decline in Public Deficit
Efficient Supervision
Market Discipline and Transparency
Sound Sound BankingBanking
Strong Strong Economy Economy
and and Sustainable Sustainable
Growth Growth EnvironmentEnvironment
Corporate Restructuring
Goal: Sound banking-strong Goal: Sound banking-strong economyeconomy
10
““Strong Banking Sector, Strong Strong Banking Sector, Strong
EconomyEconomy””
Consolidation in the banking sector Consolidation in the banking sector Number of banks declined from 81 in 1990 Number of banks declined from 81 in 1990
to 53 as of April 2003to 53 as of April 2003 Decline in the share of the State and Decline in the share of the State and
the SDIF banksthe SDIF banksDuring 2000-2002 the share of these banks
in total loans and deposits from 34.2% to 18% and 53.3% to 39.3%, respectively.
Increase in mergers and acquisitions Increase in mergers and acquisitions Total asset size of the mergers and Total asset size of the mergers and
acquisitions that took place in the sector acquisitions that took place in the sector is around $26.5 billionis around $26.5 billion
Results of operational Results of operational rrestructuringestructuring
11
““Strong Banking Sector, Strong Strong Banking Sector, Strong
EconomyEconomy””
Results of financial Results of financial rrestructuringestructuring
Reduction of financial risks to Reduction of financial risks to manageable levels.manageable levels.
Improved transparency Improved transparency Improved profitabilityImproved profitability
In 2002 private banks generated a profit of $1.5 billion, state banks generated a profit of $646 million
Strengthened capital structureStrengthened capital structureCAR rose to 27.1% in December 2002 from 9.3% in December 2000.
12
““Strong Banking Sector, Strong Strong Banking Sector, Strong
EconomyEconomy””
Moving towards international standardsMoving towards international standards Regulations on capitalRegulations on capital Regulations on risk managementRegulations on risk management RRegulations on credit and subsidiaries’ limits egulations on credit and subsidiaries’ limits
and loan loss provisioningand loan loss provisioning AAccounting standards and independent ccounting standards and independent
auditingauditing Regulations on facilitating mergers and Regulations on facilitating mergers and
acquisitions acquisitions Regulations on special finance housesRegulations on special finance houses MoUs with other countries supervisory MoUs with other countries supervisory
authoritiesauthorities
Improving the regulatory and Improving the regulatory and supervisory frameworksupervisory framework
13
““Strong Banking Sector, Strong Strong Banking Sector, Strong
EconomyEconomy””
CountryCountry Crisis PeriodCrisis Period Total Cost/GDP Total Cost/GDP (%)(%)
SpainSpain 1977-19851977-1985 16.816.8
JapanJapan 1990-1990- 20.020.0
IndonesiaIndonesia 1997-1997- 50.050.0
MalaysiaMalaysia 1997-1997- 20.520.5
S. KoreaS. Korea 1997-1997- 26.526.5
MexicoMexico 19951995 20.020.0
ArgentinaArgentina 1980-821980-82 55.355.3
BrazilBrazil 1994-961994-96 15.0-20.015.0-20.0
TurkeyTurkey 1999-20021999-2002 13.7-26.513.7-26.5
Turkey is not the first nor the Turkey is not the first nor the last country to experience a last country to experience a
financial crisisfinancial crisis
14
““Strong Banking Sector, Strong Strong Banking Sector, Strong
EconomyEconomy””
The initial fiscal costs of the The initial fiscal costs of the Turkish Turkish
crisis have been highcrisis have been high
In addition, private banks In addition, private banks raised $2.4 billion of capital from raised $2.4 billion of capital from own resources.own resources.
Thus, much of the costs of adopting international standards Thus, much of the costs of adopting international standards have already been borne. Annualized costs of $4bn have have already been borne. Annualized costs of $4bn have been incurred which can be thought of harmonization costs.been incurred which can be thought of harmonization costs.
BillionUSBillionUSDD
Ratio to GDP Ratio to GDP (%)(%)
State Banks Duty LossesState Banks Duty Losses 19.019.0 12.812.8
Capital Support to State Capital Support to State BanksBanks
2.92.9 2.02.0
Resolution of SDIF Resolution of SDIF banksbanks
21.721.7 14.914.9
-Public Resources-Public Resources 17.017.0 11.711.7
-Private Resources-Private Resources 4.74.7 3.23.2
15
““Strong Banking Sector, Strong Strong Banking Sector, Strong
EconomyEconomy””
Turkish banks have similar Turkish banks have similar concentration ratios to EU concentration ratios to EU averageaverage
Graph 1: Concentration Ratio of 5 Largest Banks (%)
59
75,8
57,7
0
20
40
60
80
EU Average CandidateCountries Average
Turkey
2001
%
16
““Strong Banking Sector, Strong Strong Banking Sector, Strong
EconomyEconomy””
While the share of the While the share of the state banks remain very state banks remain very high in Turkeyhigh in Turkey
Graph 2: Public Share (%)
10
24
33
0
10
20
30
40
EU Average CandidateCountries Average
Turkey
2001
%
17
““Strong Banking Sector, Strong Strong Banking Sector, Strong
EconomyEconomy””
Although capital adequacy Although capital adequacy is high, free capital is high, free capital remains limitedremains limited
Graph 3: CAR
12,04
16,24 16,5
0
5
10
15
20
EU Average CandidateCountries Average
Turkey
2001
%
"
18
““Strong Banking Sector, Strong Strong Banking Sector, Strong
EconomyEconomy””
Blanket guarantee Blanket guarantee introduced during the introduced during the crisis in Turkeycrisis in Turkey
Graph 4: Deposit Insurance
30667
11939
27027
0
10.000
20.000
30.000
40.000
EU Average CandidateCountriesAverage
Turkey
2001
Eur
o
19
““Strong Banking Sector, Strong Strong Banking Sector, Strong
EconomyEconomy””
Low financial Low financial intermediation by Turkish intermediation by Turkish banksbanks
Graph 8: Financial intermediation indicators
474
186 167117
8357
9461
19
0
100
200
300
400
500
Assets/GDP Deposits/GDP Loans/GDP
2001
%
EU Average Candidate Countries Average Turkey
20
““Strong Banking Sector, Strong Strong Banking Sector, Strong
EconomyEconomy””
Size of the banking sector Size of the banking sector is smallis small
Graph 5: Average Bank Size (Total Assets / # of banks)
4.494
1.025
2.472
0
1.000
2.000
3.000
4.000
5.000
6.000
EU Average Candidate Coun.Ave.
Turkey
2001
Valu
e (m
illion
Eur
o)
21
““Strong Banking Sector, Strong Strong Banking Sector, Strong
EconomyEconomy””
Over-branched banking Over-branched banking networknetwork
Graph 6: Number of Branches per Bank
36 33
113
0
50
100
150
EU Average CandidateCoun. Ave.
Turkey
2001
Val
ue
22
““Strong Banking Sector, Strong Strong Banking Sector, Strong
EconomyEconomy””
Government crowding-outGovernment crowding-out
Graph 16: Debt Securities / Total Assets
21,68
34,5
0 10 20 30 40
EuropeanUnion
Turkey
23
““Strong Banking Sector, Strong Strong Banking Sector, Strong
EconomyEconomy””
Literature on foreign bank Literature on foreign bank entryentry
Features that attract foreign banks: liberalization of financial markets degree of economic integration between
host and parent countries support of the client base (“follow the
client”) (Konopielko,1999; Clarke at al, 2001).
profit opportunities, low taxes (Claessens et al., 2001; Clarke at al, 2001)
fewer regulatory restrictions for investment (Clarke at al, 2001).
24
““Strong Banking Sector, Strong Strong Banking Sector, Strong
EconomyEconomy””
EExpected benefits xpected benefits of of foreign foreign bank entrybank entry
Claessens Claessens et al.et al., 2001; Konopielko, 1999, 2001; Konopielko, 1999 iincreasencrease in in efficiency and better resource efficiency and better resource
allocation allocation iincreasencrease in in competition competition broad application of modern banking technology broad application of modern banking technology increased access to international capital marketsincreased access to international capital markets stimulate development of supervisory and stimulate development of supervisory and
regulatory practices regulatory practices
25
““Strong Banking Sector, Strong Strong Banking Sector, Strong
EconomyEconomy””
Potential disadvantages of Potential disadvantages of foreign bank entryforeign bank entry
Crystal Crystal et al et al (2002) and Stiglitz (1993)(2002) and Stiglitz (1993)
difficulties to compete with large international difficulties to compete with large international banksbanks
lower lower access to financial services by access to financial services by domesticdomestics as s as foreign banks generally serve to multinational firmsforeign banks generally serve to multinational firms
less sensitivity to host country’s government less sensitivity to host country’s government policiespolicies
vulnerability vulnerability to to economic conditioneconomic conditionss in the home in the home country country
26
““Strong Banking Sector, Strong Strong Banking Sector, Strong
EconomyEconomy””
MarketMarket share of share of foreign foreign banksbanks
Source: Bankscope; IMF, 2000.
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
19941999
(%)
Turkey (June Turkey (June 2002)2002): % 4.9: % 4.9
HungaryChile
PolandCzech Republic
ArgentinaVenezuela
PeruMexico
ColombiaBrazil
MalaysiaThailand
Korea
27
““Strong Banking Sector, Strong Strong Banking Sector, Strong
EconomyEconomy””
Turkish experienceTurkish experienceDespite...Despite... a a long history of liberalization policies long history of liberalization policies and and practicespractices advanced advanced technological facilitiestechnological facilities qualified human capital in banking sectorqualified human capital in banking sector
...foreign bank presence has been limited due to:...foreign bank presence has been limited due to: persistent macroeconomic instability persistent macroeconomic instability (high and (high and
volatile inflation)volatile inflation) low volume of foreign direct investment low volume of foreign direct investment delays in taking necessary steps for financial sector delays in taking necessary steps for financial sector
reforms reforms
28
““Strong Banking Sector, Strong Strong Banking Sector, Strong
EconomyEconomy””
Recent increased interestRecent increased interest IIncreased interestncreased interest in in the aftermath of the the aftermath of the
bank restructuring programbank restructuring program
Unicredito Unicredito 49% of 49% of KocbankKocbank shares shares
HSBC HSBC acquired acquired DemirbankDemirbank
However further measures are necessary However further measures are necessary to attract foreign investorsto attract foreign investors
29
““Strong Banking Sector, Strong Strong Banking Sector, Strong
EconomyEconomy””
Need to reduce intermediation Need to reduce intermediation costscosts
25,0
30,0
35,0
40,0
45,0
50,0
55,0
60,0
Net interest rate
Withholding tax, special transaction tax
Liq. requirements, dep.ins. premiums
Banking and insurance transaction tax, stamp duties, premiums
% 37,9
% 46,0
% 48,6
% 56,1
From TL deposits to TL corporate credits
30
““Strong Banking Sector, Strong Strong Banking Sector, Strong
EconomyEconomy””
Need to reduce intermediation Need to reduce intermediation costscosts
-
2,0
4,0
6,0
8,0
10,0
12,0
Net interest rate
Withholding tax,
Liq. Req., dep.ins. premiums
Banking and insurance transaction tax, stamp
% 4,0
% 5,0
% 6,7
% 10,3
From FX deposits to FX credits
31
““Strong Banking Sector, Strong Strong Banking Sector, Strong
EconomyEconomy””
Need to overhaul blanket Need to overhaul blanket guaranteeguarantee
BRSA/SDIF is working on a deposit insurance BRSA/SDIF is working on a deposit insurance scheme scheme Elimination of blanket guaranteeElimination of blanket guarantee AAdoption of a limited guarantee scheme in doption of a limited guarantee scheme in
accordance with EU standards (20,000 accordance with EU standards (20,000 Euro) Euro) with with a one-year transition perioda one-year transition period
Redefining protection coverage in favor of Redefining protection coverage in favor of domestic currency.domestic currency.
Transition to a rTransition to a risk basedisk based premium premium structure in which risk is fairly priced.structure in which risk is fairly priced.
Application of co-insurance in order to limit Application of co-insurance in order to limit potential claims on the insurance system.potential claims on the insurance system.
32
““Strong Banking Sector, Strong Strong Banking Sector, Strong
EconomyEconomy””
Quantitative Impact Study Quantitative Impact Study (QIS)(QIS)
Date ofexercise
No. of banksparticipating
No. ofcountries
participating
Scope
QIS 1 Autumn 2000 78 10 StandardisedFoundationAdvanced
QIS 2 Summer 2001 138 25 StandardisedFoundationAdvanced
QIS 2.5 Autumn 2001 37 12 Foundation
QIS 3 Autumn 2002 300? 50? StandardisedFoundationAdvancedAll portfoliosincludingsecuritisation
Almost 300 Almost 50
33
““Strong Banking Sector, Strong Strong Banking Sector, Strong
EconomyEconomy””
Summary QIS-2 ResultsSummary QIS-2 Results