Counter+Fort++Reatining+WAll+With+HORZONTAL+Bach+Fill (1)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/28/2019 Counter+Fort++Reatining+WAll+With+HORZONTAL+Bach+Fill (1)

    1/35

    RCC design B.C.Punmia

    18.2 TYPE OF RETAINING WALLS

    1 Gravity walls

    2 Cantilever retaining walls a. T- shaped b. L- shaped

    3 Counterfort retainig walls.

    4 Buttresssed walls.

    The cantilever retaining wall resist the horizontal earth pressure as well as other vertical pressure by w

    A gravity retaining wall shown in fig 1 is the one in which the earth pressure exrted by the

    back fill is resisted by dead weight of wall, which is either made of masonry or of mass concrete . The

    stress devlop in the wall is very low ,These walls are no proportioned that no tension is devloped any

    where, and the resultant of forces remain withen the middle third of the base.

    A retaining wall or retaining structure is used for maintaining the ground surfgaces at defrent

    elevations on either side of it. Whenever embankments are involed in construction ,retaining wall are

    usually necessary. In the construction of buildins having basements, retaining walls are mandatory.

    Similsrly in bridge work, the wing walls and abutments etc. are designed as retaining walls , to resist

    earth pressure along with superimposed loads. The material retained or supported by a retaining wall

    is called backfill lying above the horizontal plane at the elevation of the top of a wall is called the

    surcharge , and its inclination to horizontal is called the surcharge angle b

    In the design of retaining walls or other retaining structures, it is necessary to compute the

    lateral earth pressure exerted bythe retaining mass of soil. The equation of finding out the lateral earth

    pressure against retaining wall is one of the oldest in Civil Engineering field. The plastic state of

    strees, when the failure is imminent, was invetigated by Rankine in1860. A Lot of theoretical

    experiment work has been done in this field and many theory and hypothesis heve benn proposed.

    RETAINING WALL

    Retaining walls may be classified according to their mode of resisting the earth pressure,and

    according to their shape. Following are some of commen types of retaining walls (Fig)

  • 7/28/2019 Counter+Fort++Reatining+WAll+With+HORZONTAL+Bach+Fill (1)

    2/35

    y of beending of varios components acting as cantilever s.A coomon form of cantilever retaining waal

  • 7/28/2019 Counter+Fort++Reatining+WAll+With+HORZONTAL+Bach+Fill (1)

    3/35

    Hieght of cantilever wall from ground level = 7.00 mUnit weight of Earth = 18 KN/m

    3

    Angle of repose = 30 DegreeSafe Bearing capacity of soil = 180 KN/m

    3

    Coffiecent of friction = 0.5Concrete M- 20

    wt. of concrete = 25000 N/m

    3

    Steel fe 415 N/mm sst 230 N/mm2m 13.33 scbc 7 N/mm2

    Nominal cover = 30 mmFoundation depth = 1.00 m

    Counter forts width = 0.50 m

    Stem thickness At footing #REF! mm At top #REF! mm

    Heel width 2000 mm Toe width 1700 mm

    Footing width 4100 mm Key #REF! x #REF! mm

    STEM : -

    Main#REF! 10 mm F@ 90 mm c/c

    #REF! 10 mm F@ #REF! mm c/c

    Top 10 mm F@ #REF! mm c/c

    Distribution 8 mm F@ #REF! mm c/c

    Tamprecture 8 mm F@ #REF! mm c/c

    TOE : -

    Main 10 mm F@ 100 mm c/c

    Distribution 8 mm F@ 0 mm c/c

    HEEL : -

    Main 10 mm F@ #REF! mm c/c

    Distribution 8 mm F@ 180 mm c/c

    DESIGN SUMMARY

    100% Reinforcement upto m

    50% Reinforcement upto m

    25% Reinforcement upto m

    DESIGN OF COUNTOR FORT RETAINING WALL with

    horizontal back fill

    Reinforcement Summary

    [email protected]

  • 7/28/2019 Counter+Fort++Reatining+WAll+With+HORZONTAL+Bach+Fill (1)

    4/35

    mm F

    mm F @ c/c

    @ c/c

    mm F

    mm F @ c/c

    @ c/c

    mm F

    mm F @ c/c

    @ c/c

    mm F

    @ c/c

    mm F

    @ c/c

    mm F

    @ c/c

    mm F @ c/c mm F

    @ c/c

    ## F mm F

    @ c/c

    mm F

    @ c/c

    mm F

    @ c/c

    1700

    4100

    ####

    ####

    #REF!

    ####

    ####

    ####

    ####

    #REF!

    ####

    1700

    Toe

    ####

    ####

    #### ####

    Out side

    ####

    ####

    Earth side

    ####

    ####

    2000

    400

    10

    ####

    ####

    ####

    10

    ####

    10

    ####

    ####

    ####

    ####

    ####

    Heel

    2000

    ####

    ####

    ####

    ####

    ####

    ####

    400

    ####

    ####

    #REF!

    ####

    ####

    ####

    ####

    #REF!

    ####

    ####

    0

    7000

    [email protected]

  • 7/28/2019 Counter+Fort++Reatining+WAll+With+HORZONTAL+Bach+Fill (1)

    5/35

    Hieght of cantilever wall from ground level = 7.00 m

    Unit weight of Earth g = 18 kN/m = N/m

    Angle of repose = 30 Degree

    Safe Bearing capacity of soil q0 = 180 kN/m

    Coffiecent of friction m = 0.5

    Concrete = M 20Steel fe = 415

    Nominal cover = 30 mm effective cover 40 mm

    Foundation depth = 1.00 m

    Counter forts width assume = 0.50 m 500 mm

    1 Des ign Constan ts :For HYSD Bars = 20

    sst = = 230 mm = #### N/mm2 = 25 kN/mm2scbc = = 7 mm

    m = 13.33

    x

    13.33 x 7 + 230

    j=1-k/3 = 1 - 0.289 / 3 = 0.904R=1/2xc x j x k = 0.5 x 7 x 0.904 x 0.289 = 0.913

    1 - 0.5 1

    1 + 0.5 Ka

    2Diamension of var ious parts : -

    = 7.00 + 1.00 = 8.00 m

    The ratio of length of slabe (DE) to base width b is given by eq.

    q0

    2.2 y H 2.2 x 18 x 8.00

    Keep a = 0.43 Eq (1)The width of base is given by Eq.

    ( 1 - 0.43 )x( 1 + 1.29 )

    x 8.00 x 0.33

    ( 1 - 0.43 )x 0.5

    0.5 b = 0.50 x 8.00 = m

    Hence Provided b = m

    Width of toe slab = a x b = 0.43 x 4.00 = 1.72 m m

    taking the uniform thickness of stem = 300 mm = 0.30 m

    = 4.00 - 0.30 - 1.70 = 2.00 m

    Let the thickness of base slab = 300 mm = 0.3 m

    H 1/4 8.00 1/4

    y 18

    b

    6.55

    This width is excessive. Normal practice is to provide b between 0.5 to 0.6 H .

    m

    0.33

    Provided toe slab =

    3.50

    The wall will be unsafe against sliding. This will be made safe by providing a shear Key at base .

    1-sin F

    1+sinF

    =

    for design purpose

    Kp= =

    180=

    == 30 \ 3

    for design purpose

    3.84

    .

    m

    1.70

    m

    3.5 x x

    4.00

    4.00

    Hence width of heel slab

    0.7HKa 0.7

    =

    Taking maximum value of H =

    b =

    2.86=

    Ka

    m*c+sst

    =x

    (1-a) m=

    0.432

    =

    0.95 H

    = 0.95

    The base width from the considration of sliding is given by Eq.

    b

    m*c

    =

    Ka = =For soil, F

    DESIGN OF COUNTERFORT RETAINING WALL

    Cocrete M

    wt. of concrete

    13.33 7

    k=

    18000

    = 0.289

    a = 1 - = -1

    8.00

    (1- a)x(1+3 a)

    0.333

    Hence height of wall above base H

    x

    Clear spacing of counter fort =

    [email protected]

  • 7/28/2019 Counter+Fort++Reatining+WAll+With+HORZONTAL+Bach+Fill (1)

    6/35

    keep them at 3.00 m apart. Let us provide counterfort over toe slab, upto ground level at

    3.00 m clear distance.

    3

    Full dimension wall is shown in fig 1a

    Let w1 = weight of rectangular portion of stem

    w2 = weight of base slab

    w3 = weight of soil on heel slab.

    The calculation are arrenged in Tableforce(kN) Moment about toe (KN-m)

    w1 1 x 0.30 x 7.70 x 25 =

    w2 1 x 0.30 x 4.00 x 25 =

    w3 1 x 2.00 x 7.70 x 18 =

    Sw =

    Total resisting moment = kN-m ..(1)

    0.33 x 18 x( 8.00 )2

    2 2

    8

    3

    mSw 0.50 x 364.95

    PH

    - 512 = kN-m

    \ Distance x of the point of application of resultant, from toe is

    SM 486.44 b 4.00

    Sw 364.95 6 6

    b 4.00

    2 2SW 6 e 364.95 6x 0.67 183 > 180

    b b 4.00

    m, So that total wiodth is = 4.10

    force(kN) Moment about toe (KN-m)

    w1 1 x 0.30 x 7.70 x 25 =

    w2 1 x 0.30 x 4.10 x 25 =

    w3 1 x 2.00 x 7.70 x 18 =

    Sw =

    - = kN-m

    \ Distance x of the point of application of resultant, from toe is

    SM 523.00 b 4.10

    Sw 365.70 6 6

    b 4.10

    2 2

    SW 6 e 365.70 6x 0.62 170.1 < 180

    b b 4.10

    SW 6 e 365.70 6x 0.62 8.30 < 180

    b b 4.10

    1.50.95

    kN -m2

    ==

    =

    Hence safe=4.10

    Pressure p2 at Heel

    The revised computations are arranged in table

    Detail

    1 + =

    0.67

    4.00

    1.80

    859

    lever arm

    58 1.95 113

    31

    277

    1035.00

    2.05 63

    0.667

    486.44

    > 2Hence

    safe

    3.1

    total MR365.70

    x = = =

    512.00 523.00

    = 0.683

    = Hence safe

    Eccent ic i ty e =

    kN -m2

    < 0.683

    Pressure p1 at toe= 1 +

    Hence safe

    [email protected]

  • 7/28/2019 Counter+Fort++Reatining+WAll+With+HORZONTAL+Bach+Fill (1)

    7/35

    170.10 - 8.30

    170.10 - 8.30

    4

    = 3.00 m

    = 8.30 kN/m2

    witch is minimum at C.

    = 7.70 x 1 x 1.00 x 18 = kN-m2

    = 0.30 x 1 x 1.00 x 25 = kN-m2

    = 138.60 + 7.50 - 8.30 = N-m2

    Maximum negative bending moment in heel slab.at counter fort is

    Pl2 137.8 x 3.00

    12

    BM x 106

    Rxb x

    137.8 x 3.00

    = 0.72 % tc = 0.33

    V 207 x 1000

    tc x b 0.33 x 1000

    500 60 mm d = 500 - 60 = 440 mm

    207 x 1000

    1000 x 440

    x

    230 x 0.904 x 440

    3.14xdia2 = 3.14 x 12 x 12 = 113 mm2

    4 4

    \ Spacing A x1000 / Ast = 113 x 1000 / 1130 = mm

    Hence Provided 12 mm F bar, @ mm c/cLet us check this reinforcement for development length at point of contraflexure is situated at distance

    of 0.211.L In over case, the slab is continuous, but we will assume the same position of contraflexure

    i.e. at 0.211 x 3.00 = 0.63 m from the face of conunterforts.

    pL l L l

    2 2 2 2

    3.00

    2

    Assuming that all the bars will avilable at point of contraflexure,

    M = sst x Ast x j x d = 230 x 1130 x 0.904 x 440 = N-mmLo = witch ever is more = 440 mm

    Ld = 45x F = 45 x 12 = 540 mm

    M

    V

    440 mm beyond the point of contraflexure. After that, curtail

    length of each bar available = 630 + 440 = 1070 > Ld = 540 m

    PL2

    3

    16 4

    3 3

    4 4

    M1

    mm providing effective cover =

    Hence depth required from shear point of veiw d

    However keep =

    =

    These bars will be provide at the top face of heel slab. Maximum Passive B.M. =

    - x

    or d,

    0.33

    0.63

    100

    tv = N/mm2= 0.47 Shear reinforcement required

    2'=

    Effective depth required =

    207 kN

    N/mm2

    = 626 mm=

    1.80

    119886

    =

    Design of Heel slab:-

    The Pressure intencity p1 under E is p1

    =

    2

    this is

    excessive

    103.35 kN-m

    =

    p1 =

    For balance section , having P

    mm0.913

    >

    =103.35

    1000

    Shear force V

    336

    Area of steel at supports is given by Ast

    Shear force at this point is given

    = 137.8

    \ + Lo

    99.07

    138.6

    87.20

    =

    The pressure distribution on the heel slab is shown in fig 1b .consider a strip 1 meter

    170.10

    137.8

    170.10 -4.10

    x

    Down ward weight of slab per unit area

    kN-m2

    The Pressure intencity p2 under B is p2

    p

    Hence net pressure intensities will be P

    - x

    7.5

    Clear spacing b etween co unter fort

    kN-m2

    wide.Near the outer edge C. The upward pressure intencity

    Down ward load due to weight of Earth.

    =M1

    4.10=2.10=

    x

    Hence safe

    N

    =

    - x + = p

    =

    =

    12

    -

    100

    mm210'

    6103.35

    =

    =

    103350000

    +119886

    103350000

    using 12 mm bars

    1130

    A =

    =

    x 1130

    540>1302

    Hence safe

    = mm2847

    =

    =

    440

    Cotinue these bars by a distance lo = d =

    half bars, and continue the remaining half throughout the length. At the point of curtailment,

    mm

    \ Area of Bottom steel Ast2 = x Ast1

    [email protected]

  • 7/28/2019 Counter+Fort++Reatining+WAll+With+HORZONTAL+Bach+Fill (1)

    8/35

    3.14xdia2 = 3.14 x 12 x 12 = 113 mm2

    4 4

    \ Spacing A x1000 / Ast = 113 x 1000 / 847 = mm

    Hence Provided 12 mm F bar, @ mm c/c

    1000 x 113

    Let us check this reinforcement for development length crierion at point of contraflexur,

    M Where V = Shear at point of contraflexure= N

    V = 0.63 mAssuming that all bars are available at point of contraflexure,

    M = sst x Ast x j x d = 230 x 870 x 0.904 x 440 = N-mmLo = witch ever is more = 440 mm

    Ld = 45x F = 45 x 12 = 540 mm as before

    M

    V

    Thus continue all bottom bars to a point distance Lo = 440 mm from the point of contraflexure,

    630 - 440 = 190 mm from the center of sports.

    At this point half bars can be discontinued. Since this distance is quite small,

    it is better to continue these bars upto center of counterfors.

    Reinforcement near B :- The c/c spacing of reinforcement near B may be increased, because P decrease

    due to increase in upward soil reaction. Consider a strip 1 m wide near B

    kN/m2 As found earlier.

    weight of earth + weight of counterforts - upward soil reaction

    \ Net downward load p = 138.60 +( 0.50 x 25 ) - 87.2 = 63.9 kN/m2

    This is about = 63.90 / 137.8 = 0.464 of load intencity at C

    = 100 / 0.464 = 200 mm c/c at the top face, near supports

    Spacing of steel bars at the bottom face, at mid span= 133 / 0.464 = 300 mm c/c

    0.12

    100

    P D2

    3.14 x ( 12 )'2

    41000 x 113

    shear stress at C = tv = 0.47

    100 x 1130

    1000 x 440

    0.26 % = 0.21 (See Table 3.1)

    Safe if tv< tc Here 0.47 > 0.21 Hence shear reinforcement required

    Vc = tc b x d= 0.21 x 1000 x 440 = #### N or 92.4 kN

    = 92.4 kN

    92.4 1.50 - x1

    207

    = 0.80 m on either side of each counterforts.

    The requirement is there form a strip of unit width paassing through C,

    such that shear force at the counterforts isd = 92.4 kN

    Net down ward pressure at C = 137.80 kN/m2, 63.90 kN/m

    2

    Lt net down ward pressure at B1=w1 x 3/2=1.5w1 This is equal to = 92.4 kN

    92.40

    1.50

    137.80 - 6461.6= 137.8 =y1 - 36.95 Y1w1= -137.80

    2.00

    1.50

    Net down ward pressure at B =

    w= = 61.6 kN/m2 However at Y1 from C,

    0.80 mThe position is given by= =

    Permissible shear stress for

    Hence shear stirrups are required upto distance

    steel provided tc

    =

    500

    Shear reinforcement.

    =

    \ Spacing = = 188

    \ +Lo>Ld

    i.e. upto a distance =

    119886+ 440

    +Lo>LdInherent in criterion :

    >

    Distribution steel = x 1000

    Hence spacing of steel bars

    Net downward load p' =

    x

    =79531705

    119886

    Distance from face of supports

    Hence safe5401103=

    =130

    =

    79531705

    870 mm2

    using 12 mm bars A =

    % of steel provided =

    Actual Ast

    mm2

    133

    130

    or d,

    600

    Upward soil reaction at B is = 87.2

    mm2113

    N/mm2

    or x1 -

    Consider a section distance x1 from face of counterfort, where shear force is

    =1.50

    =

    Using 12 mm F bars, Area ==

    600

    =

    4

    mm say = 180 mm c/c

    0.70

    0.26 %

    [email protected]

  • 7/28/2019 Counter+Fort++Reatining+WAll+With+HORZONTAL+Bach+Fill (1)

    9/35

    \ y1 = 2.10 m

    Hence shear reinforcement is required in triangular portion on the other side of counterforts shown hatched in fig .

    However, we will provide shear strirrups in reangular portion x1 x y1= 0.80 x 2.10 = 1.68 m on

    either side of counterforts.

    Let us provide 4 8 mm F wire

    P D2

    3.14 x ( 8 )'2

    4

    201 x 230 x 440

    207 - 92.40 )x 1000Hence provided the 8 mm F 4 lgd strirrups @ 170 mm c/c either side of each counterforts.

    5Design of toe slab :- Since the toe slab is also large, provide counterforts over it, upto ground level at

    3.00 m clear distance face to face. The toe slab will thus bend like a contious slab.

    = 500 mm or 0.5 m

    = 0.50 x 1 x 1 x 25 = kN//m2

    = 170.10 - 12.50 = kN//m2

    = 99.07 - 12.50 = kN//m2

    Cosidering strip of unit width at D.

    wl2 157.60 x 3.00

    2

    12

    BM x 10 6

    Rxb x

    157.6 x 3.00

    = 0.30 N/mm2 assuming % steel 0.5 % table 3.1

    236 x 1000

    1000 x 0.300

    500 60 mm d = 500 - 60 = 440 mm

    x230 x 0.904 x 440

    3.14xdia2 = 3.14 x 12 x 12

    4 4

    \ Spacing A x1000 / Ast = 113 x 1000 / 1292 = mm

    Hence Provided 12 mm F bar, @ 80 mm c/c

    1000 x 113

    Let us check this reinforcement for development length crierion at point of contraflexur,

    M

    V

    Hence shear force at the point of contraflexure is V =

    w L 3.00

    2 2

    M = 230 x 1413 x 0.904 x 440 = NmmLo = witch ever is more = 440 mm

    Ld = 45x F = 45 x 12 = 540 mm

    M

    V

    Hence satisfied , continue these bars, at the bottom of toe slab, beyond the point of contraflexure

    440.0 mm i.e. by a distance of 630 + 440.0 = 1070 mm

    mm359.8

    1292

    mm2=

    mm=

    =

    m

    178Sv=Asv.ssv.d

    V - Vc

    =

    = = 201 mm2

    4

    legged stirrups of

    Using 8 mm F bars, Area =

    1000

    The depth of slab required from shear point of view is given by d= V / (b x tc)

    d =

    =

    Total weight of toe slab

    =

    = 236.4 kN

    Taking a permissible stress tc

    kN/m2

    Similarly Net upward pressure intencity at E

    = 10'6

    86.57

    118.2 x

    -

    10'6

    This is excessive ,However we will keep the same depth as that of heel

    Effective depth required =

    Max. negative B.M.

    Shear force V =

    Assume total depth of toe slab

    Net upward pressure intencity at D 157.60

    12.50

    2

    118.20

    0.913

    12=

    mmArea of steel at supports, at bottom is Ast =

    =

    However keep =

    using 12 mm bars A = 113

    118.20

    1413 mm2

    mm providing effective cover =

    and provide shear strirrups to take up excessive shearing stress.

    788 mm

    N

    Inherent in criterion :

    or d,

    \ +Lo>Ld =129239020.21

    by a distance of Lo=

    > 540 Hence safe137112

    + 440 = 1383

    +Lo>Ld

    87.5

    Actual Ast = =80

    0.63=Where the point of contraflexure occure at

    distance x rom supports

    V =

    129239020

    137112.0- x 157.6= x 0.63 =

    [email protected]

  • 7/28/2019 Counter+Fort++Reatining+WAll+With+HORZONTAL+Bach+Fill (1)

    10/35

    from the face of counterforts

    3 3

    4 4

    3 3

    4 4

    3.14xdia2 = 3.14 x 12 x 12 = 113 mm2

    4 4

    \ A x1000 / Ast = 113 x 1000 / 969 = mm

    Hence Provided 12 mm F bar, @ mm c/c1000 x 113

    Let us check this reinforcement for development length crierion at point of contraflexur,

    M

    V

    Assuming that all bars provided at top face,are available at point of contraflexure,

    M = sst x Ast x j x d = 230 x 1028 x 0.904 x 440 = N-mmLo = witch ever is more = 440 mm

    Ld = 45x F = 45 x 12 = 540 mm

    M

    V

    Thus continue all bottom bars to a point distance Lo = 440 mm from the point of contraflexure,

    630 - 440 = 190 mm from the center of sports.

    At this point half bars can be discontinued. Since this distance is quite small,

    it is better to continue these bars upto center of counterfors.

    Reinforcement at E :- At a section distance 1 meter from E,

    170.1 - 8.30

    \ Net upward pressure = 138.5 - 12.50 = kN/m2

    This is about = 126.0 / 157.60 = 0.80 ofw at D

    \ Spacing of bottom steel = 87.5 / 0.80 = mm say = 100 mm

    Spacing of top steel = 117 / 0.80 = mm say = 140 mm

    0.12100

    P D2

    3.14 x ( 12 )'2

    4

    1000 x 113

    Shear reinforcement shear force at D = kN

    236.40 x 1000

    Beam Ht.x beam wt. 1000 x 440

    100 x 1413 table

    1000 x 440 3.1

    0.32 % = 0.24 (See Table 3.1)

    Safe if tv< tc Here 0.54 > 0.24 Shear reinforcement required

    Vc = tc b x d= 0.24 x 1000 x 440 = N or 105.6 kN

    = 105.6 kN

    105.6 1.50 - x2

    236.40

    = 0.80 m on either side of each counterforts.

    The requirement is there form a strip of unit width paassing through D, Let us consider a strip through E1,

    distance y2 from D, such that shear force at the counterforts is kN. To find the position ofY2

    consider the net pressure distribution below the toe.

    = 969

    > 540 Hence safe

    as before

    N

    137112

    or d,

    93992015+ 440 = 1126

    110

    137112

    236.4

    146

    600

    x 0.80 =

    x

    170.1

    mm2

    93992015

    mm2

    N-m

    mm2

    Where V = Shear at point of contraflexure=

    kN/m2

    126.0

    109

    -4.10

    Inherent in criterion : +Lo>Ld

    i.e. upto a distance =

    upward soil pressure =

    117

    110Actual Ast = = 1028

    = x

    \ +Lo>Ld =

    Spacing =

    using 12 mm bars A =

    \ Area of Bottom steel Ast2 = x Ast1 = x 1292

    106x 118.20 x 10'

    6

    0.70

    Using 12 mm F bars, Area =

    1.50=

    Hence shear stirrups are required upto distance

    N/mm2

    N/mm2

    The position is given by= = or x2 = 1.50

    180

    = x 500

    -

    4= 113

    600=

    Permissible shear stress tc for

    % of steel provided =

    Consider a section distance x1 from face of counterfort, where shear force is

    105600

    tc

    shear force=

    N/mm2

    =

    =

    Shear stress tv =

    \ Spacing = 188 mm say

    =

    Distribution steel

    \ =

    1000

    steel provided tc

    = 0.32 %

    = 0.54

    138.50

    mm c/c

    0.24

    0.80 m

    mm2

    105.6

    88.7Again, positive B.M. x M1 =

    [email protected]

  • 7/28/2019 Counter+Fort++Reatining+WAll+With+HORZONTAL+Bach+Fill (1)

    11/35

    = 12.50 Hence net pressure intencity below D an dE are

    below D = 170.1 - 12.50 = 157.6 kN/m2,

    and below E 99.1 - 12.50 = 86.6 kN/m

    Let the net pressure intencity at E1 = w2 x 3/2 = 1.5 w2 kN/m2

    \ Shear force at the counterforts at E1 = w2 x 3/2 =1.5m w2 kN/M2

    This is equal to = 105.6 kN

    105.60

    1.50

    157.60 - 86.6

    = 157.60 - 39.46 Y2 = \ y2 = 2.20 mThis is > than DE DE = 1.80 m

    = kN/m2

    1.50 x 86.57 = kN/m2

    Considered a section distence Z from the face of dounterforts (Point E), where S.F. is 105.6 kN

    105.60 1.50 - Z

    129.85

    = 0.30 m only.

    However, we will provide shear strirrups for whole of rectangular area (shown dotted),

    for width DD 1 ,= x2 = 0.80 m and length DE = 0.30 m

    Let us provide 8 8 mm F wire

    P D2

    3.14 x ( 8 )'2

    4

    402 x 230 x 440

    236.4 - 105.60 )x 1000

    Hence provided the 8 mm F 8 lgd strirrups @ 300 mm c/c either side of each counterforts.

    6Design of stem (vert ical slab)

    The stem acts as a continuous slab. Considred 1 m strip at B .

    The intencity of earth pressure is given by. ph = KayH1 = 0.33 x 18 x 7.50 = 45.0 kN/m2

    Hence revised H1= 8.00 - 0.50 = 7.50 m

    L2 45.00 x( 3 )2

    12

    BMRxb x

    60 mm, so total depth = 192 + 60 = 252 mm

    300 mm and effective thickness = 300 - 60 = 240 mm

    this increased thickness will keep the shear stress within limit so that additional shear

    45.0 x 3 67.50 x 1000 N

    1000 x 240 mm2

    this is less than = tc = 0.3

    230 x 0.904 x 240

    Reinforcement corresponding to p = 0.50 %

    0.50 x 1000 x 240

    P D2

    3.14 x ( 12 )'2

    4

    1000 x 113

    113 100 x 1256

    90 1000 x 240%1000 = = 0.52

    0.28

    N/mm2

    at 0.5% reinfocement (see Table 3.1)

    kN \ =

    =

    mm c/c

    = mm2

    =

    =

    =

    =0.913

    Shear force V =2

    =

    Effective depth required =

    w2= = 70.4

    reinforcement not required.

    Providing effective cover =

    However provide total depth d =

    12

    Sv=

    Actual shear forceat E =

    =

    (2)

    Equating the two we get,

    1.80Y2157.60However at Y2 from D, w2=

    70.4

    39.46157.6

    mmV - Vc

    Asv.ssv.d= =

    = 402 mm2

    4

    129.8

    The position of Z is given = 1.22

    -

    =1.50

    =

    - y2 =

    1.50 -

    is = pbd/100

    100

    =

    mm say =

    4

    90

    kN/m2

    \

    Hence shear stirrups are to be procided for a region DEE2D 1 , where EE2

    B.M. ph x

    =

    legged stirrups of

    311

    =

    mm2

    Area of steel near conuterforts is

    Actual AS provided= x 1256

    Using 12 mm F bars, Area

    1200

    =

    Spacing = = 94

    m

    N-mm

    .(1)

    = 0.30

    = 677

    113

    mm2

    = 1200

    100As

    bdmm

    2and

    =

    Self weight of toe slab

    105.6Hence shear force at E is more than

    Using

    or Z

    8 mm F bars, Area

    =

    33750000

    =

    =

    33750000

    33750000 mm192

    tc

    1000

    67.5

    [email protected]

  • 7/28/2019 Counter+Fort++Reatining+WAll+With+HORZONTAL+Bach+Fill (1)

    12/35

    Let us check these bars for devlopment length, near points of contraflexure, so as to satisfy the criterion

    M

    V

    0.211 x 3.00 = 0.63 m from the face of counterforts ,

    shear force at this point given by V= pL/2(l/2-x)+(L/2)

    pL l L l 3

    2 2 2 2 2

    = 58.7 kN

    M = = 230 x 1256 x 0.904 x 240 = N-mmLo = 12 F or D , whichever is more = 240 mm

    Ld = 45 F = 45 x 12 = 540 mm

    M

    V 58.70 x 1000

    It is thus essencial to continue all the bars upto a point distance= 240 mm beyond

    240 + 630 = 870 mm say = 900 mm from the

    face of counterforts. These bars are to be provided at the inner face of stem slab.

    3 x M1 3

    4 4

    3x Ast 3

    4 4

    P D2 3.14 x ( 12 )'2

    4

    1000 x 113

    113 100 x 942

    120 1000 x 942

    Let us check these bars for devlopment length, near points of contraflexure, so as to satisfy the criterion

    M

    V

    M = = 230 x 942 x 0.904 x 240 = N-mm

    Lo = 12 F or D , whichever is more = 240 mm

    Ld = 45 F = 45 x 12 = 540 mm V = 58.7 As before\ M

    V 58.70 x 1000

    The spacing of reinforcement at B , found above can be increased with height .

    The pressurep h and hence the bending moment decreaases linearly with height.

    Hence the spacing of bars can be increase gradually to say 300 mm c/c near top.

    0.12

    100

    P D2

    3.14 x ( 10 )'2

    4

    1000 x 79

    7Design of main counterfort.

    Let us assuming thickness of counterforts is = 500 mm. The counterfort will thus

    be spaced @ 300 x 50 = 350 cm c/c. They will thus receive earth pressure from

    3.5 3.5 m

    At any section at depth h below the top A, the eerth pressure acting on each counter forts will be

    1

    3

    62661343

    1307 mm > 540 Hence safe+ Lo =62661343

    sst xAst x jc xd

    - x

    240 =

    = 67.5=

    = + Lo > Ld

    942

    \ Ast

    \ Spacing = = 120

    540

    =

    mm2

    +

    For fixed beam or slab carrying U.D.L. , the point of

    contraflexure is at a distance of 0.211 L

    x - 0.63

    +

    Spacing =

    = x

    +46996007

    a width of m and down ward reaction from heel slab for width of

    240

    79

    1041

    = 200

    contraflexure point =

    point of contraflexure, i.e. upto a point

    Maximum positive B.M. = =

    V = - x

    Assuming that all the bars will be available at the point of contrflexure,

    p x

    N-mm

    Area of steel = = = 1256 =

    25312500x 33750000

    942mm say = 120 mm c/c

    Using 12 mm F bars, Area = = = 113 mm2

    4

    Actual AS provided= 1000 x = 942 mm2

    and100As

    = = 0.1 %bd

    = + Lo > LdAssuming that all reinforcement is extended upto poin

    of contraflexure.

    mm2

    4

    sst xAst x jc xd 46996007

    = 360

    Using 10 mm F bars, Area = = =

    mm2

    Lo mm >=+ Hence safe

    h

    300

    =

    \ Distribution reinforcement = x 1000 x

    mm c/c360

    mm say= 218

    x 3.5 = 21 h kN/m18.00 x h

    [email protected]

  • 7/28/2019 Counter+Fort++Reatining+WAll+With+HORZONTAL+Bach+Fill (1)

    13/35

    similarly, net down ward pressure on heel at c is

    = 7.50 x 18 + 0.50 x 25 - 8.30 = kN/m2

    and that at B = 7.50 x 18 + 0.50 x 25 - 87.2 = kN/m2

    Hence reaction transferrred to each counterfort are will be

    At C, = 139.2 x 3.50 = kN/m

    At B, = 60.3 x 3.50 = kN/m

    The variations of horizontal and vertical forces on counterfort are shown in fig.

    The critical section for the counterfort will be F, since below this, enormous depth will be available to resist bending.

    7.00 m is = 21 x 7.00 = 147 kN/m1

    2

    B.M. = 514.5 x 7 / 3 = kN-m or N-mm

    Conterforts act as a T beam. However, even as a reactangular beam, depth required

    BM

    Rxb x

    60 mm, so total depth = 1622 + 60 = 1682 mm

    1700 mm and effective thickness = 1700 - 60 = 1640 mm

    Angle F of faceAC is given by Tan F = 2.00 / 7.50 = 0.3 \ F = 15

    \ sin F = 0.259 and cos F = 0.966

    Depth F1 C1 = AF1 sin F = 7 x 0.259 = 1.82 m or mm

    \ Depth FG = 1820 + 300 = 2120

    Asssuming that the steel reinforcement is provided in 2 layer with mm space

    between them and providing a nominal cover 30 mm and main bars of mm F dia

    the effective depth will be = 2120 -( 30 + 20 + 12 + 10 = 2048 mm

    230 x 0.904 x 2048

    3.14xdia2 = 3.14 x 20 x 20

    4 4

    \ No. of bars 2820 / 314 = 9 2 layers

    M d 2048

    d' cos F 0.966

    500 x 2120

    100xAs 100 x 9 x 314

    b xd x

    the height h where half of the reinforcement can curtailed will be equal to HH = 8.00 = 2.8 m

    below A, i.e. at point H. To locate the position of point of curtailmenton AC, draw Hl parallel to FG.

    mm

    beyond l, i.e. extented upto l1. The location of H corresponding to l1 can be locate by drawing line l1H1

    parallel FG. It should be noted that l1G should not less than 45 F = 900 mm similarly, other bars can be

    curtailed, if desired,

    Design of Hor izontal t ies:-

    The vertical stem has a tendency to saprate outfrom the counterforts, and hence

    should be tie to it by horizontalties. At any depth h below the top, force causing sepration

    1

    3

    here h = 7 \ force = 18 x 7 = 126 kN/m

    x 18 h kN/mh x 3.00 = 18

    However provide total depth d =

    Providing effective cover =

    Effective shear force

    60.3

    139.2

    487.20

    211.05

    Pressure intencity at h =

    Shear force at F = x 147 x 7.00 = 514.5 kN

    1820

    1200.5 1200500000

    Effective depth required = =1200500000

    = 1622 mm0.913 500

    20

    20

    Area of steel at supports, at bottom is Ast = 2820 mm

    using 20 mm bars A = = 314

    1200500000=

    =2120 mm

    mm2

    No. provode these in

    where d' = ==

    361606.1321\ Effective shear force = 514500 -

    -Q tan F

    N

    tv = N/mm2

    2120x 0.27 =1200500000

    \361606.1321

    = 0.341138

    = 0.3 %

    240Thus half bars can be curtailed at l. However these should be extent by a distance 12 F =

    area of steel =500 2120

    thus the shear stress tv is more than permisssible shear stress tc. However, the vertical

    and horizontal ties provided in counterforts will bear the excess shear stress.

    \ tc = 0.21 N/mm2

    [email protected]

  • 7/28/2019 Counter+Fort++Reatining+WAll+With+HORZONTAL+Bach+Fill (1)

    14/35

    126 x 1000

    2x3.14

    4

    1000 x 157

    200 300 mm at top

    Design of vert ical t ies:-

    Similar to the stem slab, heel slab has also tendency to seprate out from counterforts,due to net down ward force, unless tied properly by vertical ties.

    487.20 x 3.00

    211.05 x 3.00

    417.6 x 1000

    2x3.14

    4

    1000 x 226

    180.9 x 1000

    2x3.14

    4

    1000 x 226

    120 280 mm

    8Design of front counter for ts :-

    170.1 99.07 kN/m2

    at E.

    500 mm thick toe slab = 0.5 x 25 = kN/m2

    = 170.1 - 12.5 =kN/m

    = 99.07 - 12.5 = kN/m2

    The center to center spacing of counterforts, 500 mm wide is 3.50 m.Hence upward force transmitted

    to counterforts at D 157.6 x 3.50 = kN/m and at E x 3.50 = 303 kN/m

    The counterforts bent up as cantilever about face FE. Hence DF will be in compression while D 1 E1 will be

    in tension, and main reinforcement will be provide at bottom face D 1 E1

    ( 551.6 + 303.0 )x

    303 + 2 x 551.6 1.80

    + 3

    \ B.M. = 769 x 0.99 = KN-m OR N-m

    500 x 0.913

    80 mm, so total depth = 1289 + 80 = 1369 mm

    1400 mm and effective thickness = 1400 - 80 = 1320 mm

    Thus project the counterforts 400 mm above groud level,to point F1 as shown in fig 4

    230 x 0.904 x 1320

    P D2

    3.14 x ( 25 )'2

    4

    2767 provide these in one layer and continue by a=

    =Using 25 mm F bars, Area = = 491 mm2

    4

    Area of steel near conuterforts is =759000000

    = 2767 mm2

    Providing effective cover =

    However provide total depth d =

    759 759000000

    \ d =

    759000000

    = 1289 mm

    551.63030.99 m from Eacting at x = x =

    and at E 86.6

    551.6

    1.80 = 769

    Down ward weight of 12.5

    hence net w at D 157.6

    Refer fig 1 The upward pressure intencity varies from kN/m2

    at D, to

    )2= 226 mm

    2

    kN/m

    86.6

    2.0Total upward force

    mm

    mm c / c at C toThus the spacing of vertical tie can be increase gradually from

    \ spacing of ties = = 287 mm say 280

    legged ties, As = x( 12

    787

    using 12 mm f 2

    mm

    steel required at B = = 787 mm230

    mm1816 say 120\ spacing of ties = = 124

    12 )2= 226 mm

    2

    1816 mm230

    using 12 mm f 2 legged ties, As

    steel required at C =

    = x(

    3.50417.6The down wars force ar C will be

    The down wars force ar B will be 180.9

    Near end C, the heel slab is tied to counterforts with the help of main reinforcement of counterforts.

    kN/m3.50

    548=spacing

    however provide mm c/c at bottom and gradualy increase to

    = 286 mm

    =\ steel required

    x( 10using 10 mm f 2 legged ties, As =

    230

    )2= 157 mm

    2

    = mm548

    kN/m

    see fig.

    =

    [email protected]

  • 7/28/2019 Counter+Fort++Reatining+WAll+With+HORZONTAL+Bach+Fill (1)

    15/35

    491

    M 0.90

    d' 1.80

    759 0.90

    1.32 1.80

    482 x 1000

    500 x 1320

    100xAs 100 x 6 x 491

    b xd xtv > tc shear reinforcement is required

    2x3.14

    4

    Vc = tcxbxd = 0.280 x 500 x 1320 =

    V1 = V - Vc = - = N

    230 x 226 x 1320

    230 mm c/c provide 2 x 12 mm f bars on top for holding.

    9Fixing effect in stem, toe and heel :-

    At the junction of stem, toe and heel slab fixing moment are included,which

    normal reinforcement given below may be provided.

    (I) In stem@ 0.8x0.3 =0.24% of cross section, to be provided at inner face,

    in vertical direction,for a length 45 F

    0.24

    100

    P D2

    3.14 x ( 10 )'2

    4

    1000 x 79

    Length embedment in stem, above heel slab = 45 x 10 = 450 mm

    (II) In toe slab @ 0.12% to be provided at the lowae face

    0.12100

    P D2

    3.14 x ( 10 )'2

    4

    1000 x 79

    Length embedment in stem, above toe slab = 45 x 10 = 450 mm

    (III) In heel slab @ 0.12% to be provided in upper face

    0.12

    100

    P D2

    3.14 x ( 10 )'2

    4

    1000 x 79

    Length embedment in stem, above heel slab = 45 x 10 = 450 mm

    Each of above reinforcement should anchored properly in adjoining slab, as shown in fig 5

    10. Design o f shear key:-

    However providethese @

    and tv = =

    \ svVs

    ssv.Asv.d= =

    296700

    0.730

    = x =769 - kN

    N/mm2

    481500

    % \ tc

    12

    = 0.280area of steel = = 0.45

    500 1320

    2 = x(

    since

    using 12 mm f

    N

    481500 184800 296700

    )2= 226 mm

    2

    184800

    table

    3.1

    legged ties, As

    231

    distance of 45 F beyond E

    Effective shear force = Q - tan F

    \

    V

    mmsubject to a maxi.

    300 mm

    N/mm2

    From fig 4 tanF =

    481.5

    =

    are at right angles to their normal direction of bending. These moment are not determine , but

    Using 10 =

    = 720=Ast x 1000

    500 =

    \ mm2x 300

    = x 1000 x

    mm F bars, Area = mm2

    4= 79

    = 100Spacing = = 109720

    mm say mm c/c

    600 mm2

    Using 10 mm F bars, Area = = =

    \

    79

    Ast

    79 mm2

    4

    \ Spacing = = 131 mm say

    \ Ast = x

    = =

    mm c/c600

    1000 x 500 = 600 mm2

    130=

    = 130Spacing = = 131 mm say

    Using 10 mm F bars, Area =

    mm c/c600

    The wall is in unsafe in sliding, and hence shear key will have to be provided, as shown in fig. 6

    mm2

    4

    \

    [email protected]

  • 7/28/2019 Counter+Fort++Reatining+WAll+With+HORZONTAL+Bach+Fill (1)

    16/35

    Pp = KpP = 3.00 x 99.07 = kN/m2

    Pp x a = a

    18

    2.00

    or PH = 3.00 x( 8 + a )2

    = 4.10 ax 18 = 73.80 a

    \ SW = 364.95 + 73.80 a Refer force calculation table=

    mSw+Pp 0.5 x ( 364.95 + 73.80 a) 297.20 a

    3 x( 8.00 + a2 )

    0.5 x ( 364.95 + 73.80 a) 297.20 a

    1.5

    ( 8 + a)2 = 182.48 + 36.9 a+ 297.20 a

    4.5

    ( 8 + a)2 = 40.55 + 74.24 a

    64 + 16 a + a2 = 74.24 a- 16 a + 40.55 - 64

    a2 = 58.24 a -23.45

    or a = a2 - 58.24 a +

    or a = 0.405 m say = 410 mm

    = 400 mm. and width of key 400 mm

    Now size of key = 400 x 400 mm

    PH = 3.00 x( 8.00 + a )2

    = 3.00 x( 8.00 + 0.40 )2

    PH = kN

    = a = x

    = kN Hence

    SW = 364.95 + 73.80 a

    = 364.95 + 73.80 x 0.40

    = kN

    Actual force to be resisted by the key at F.S. 1.5 is = 1.5PH - mSW= 1.5 x 211.7 - 0.5 x 394.5 = kN

    120.29 x 1000

    400 x 1000

    120.29 x 200 x 1000

    1/6 x 1000 x( 400 )2

    = N/mm2 Hence safe

    The details reinforcement shown in fig 7

    297.20 0.40

    211.68

    Sliding force at level D1C1 =

    Hence keep depth of key

    23.45

    297.20

    120.29

    = 0.30 N/mm2

    =

    x3

    0.90

    394.5

    118.88

    Bending stress =

    \ shear stress =

    .(2)

    a )2

    297.20

    x( 8 +1.5

    +

    Hence equilibrium of wall, permitting F.S. 1.5 against sliding we have

    8

    =a)2

    PH=1.5

    x(

    Weight of the soil between bottom of the base and D 1C1

    x0.33

    Let the depth of key =a intensity of passive pressure Pp devloped in front of key depend upon

    the soil pressure P in front of the key

    297.20

    \ total passive pressure Pp =

    [email protected]

  • 7/28/2019 Counter+Fort++Reatining+WAll+With+HORZONTAL+Bach+Fill (1)

    17/35

    0.3

    `

    0.3

    7.50

    7.00

    3.00

    0.3

    2.00 D1

    D E B C 1.00

    2.00 E1 E B B

    4.10 D y2

    y2

    w2

    x2

    63.9

    0

    1.80

    FIG. 2

    DESIGN OF COUNTOR FORT RETAINING WALL with horizontal back fill

    170.1

    99.0

    7

    1.70

    1.80

    x2

    8.3

    0

    FIG. 1

    0.50

    4.00

    87.2

    0

    86.5

    7

    157.6

    0

  • 7/28/2019 Counter+Fort++Reatining+WAll+With+HORZONTAL+Bach+Fill (1)

    18/35

    0.30 A

    F1

    h

    G.Level F

    21 h kn/m

    8.00 D F E7.50

    G D1 E1

    G1

    F 147.00 kN/m

    F1 F2 551.6

    1.00 E B kN/m

    C

    168.00 kN/m

    211.05 487.2kN/m 300

    D E

    mm F

    mm c/c 450 D1

    Pp

    10 mm F

    130 mm c/c

    2.00

    7.00

    0.5

    DESIGN OF COUNTOR FORT RETAINING WALL with horizontal back fill

    1.80

    1

    0.40

    0.50

    a

    4.10FIG. 3

    FIG. 4

    0.51.00

    0.50

    FIG. 6FIG. 5

    170.1

    0

    99.0

    7

    10

    100

    450

  • 7/28/2019 Counter+Fort++Reatining+WAll+With+HORZONTAL+Bach+Fill (1)

    19/35

    300 300

    12 mm F 10 mm F

    300 mm c/c 300 mm c/c

    12 mm F 1 10 mm F

    240 mm c/c 265 mm c/c

    12 mm F 10 mm F

    180 mm c/c 230 mm c/c

    8000

    12 mm F 10 mm F

    120 mm c/c 200 mm c/c

    12 mm F 0 mm F

    110 mm c/c 12 mm F 0 mm c/c

    3 900 180 mm c/c 2x12 mm F

    2 2

    12 mm F2 lgd

    230 mm c/c

    3 12 mm F 12 mm F

    12 mm F 130 mm c/c 80 mm c/c

    130 mm c/c 400 1 25 mm F 400

    0 mm F 6 No.Bars 0 mm

    0 mm c/c 0 mm

    400

    DESIGN OF COUNTOR FORT RETAINING WALL with horizontal back fill

    Cross -section mid way between co

    2000

    400

    Holding bars

    Cross -section mid way between counterfoorts

    5001800

  • 7/28/2019 Counter+Fort++Reatining+WAll+With+HORZONTAL+Bach+Fill (1)

    20/35

    mm

    mm

    Fron

    tcounterforts

    mm

  • 7/28/2019 Counter+Fort++Reatining+WAll+With+HORZONTAL+Bach+Fill (1)

    21/35

  • 7/28/2019 Counter+Fort++Reatining+WAll+With+HORZONTAL+Bach+Fill (1)

    22/35

  • 7/28/2019 Counter+Fort++Reatining+WAll+With+HORZONTAL+Bach+Fill (1)

    23/35

  • 7/28/2019 Counter+Fort++Reatining+WAll+With+HORZONTAL+Bach+Fill (1)

    24/35

  • 7/28/2019 Counter+Fort++Reatining+WAll+With+HORZONTAL+Bach+Fill (1)

    25/35

  • 7/28/2019 Counter+Fort++Reatining+WAll+With+HORZONTAL+Bach+Fill (1)

    26/35

  • 7/28/2019 Counter+Fort++Reatining+WAll+With+HORZONTAL+Bach+Fill (1)

    27/35

  • 7/28/2019 Counter+Fort++Reatining+WAll+With+HORZONTAL+Bach+Fill (1)

    28/35

  • 7/28/2019 Counter+Fort++Reatining+WAll+With+HORZONTAL+Bach+Fill (1)

    29/35

  • 7/28/2019 Counter+Fort++Reatining+WAll+With+HORZONTAL+Bach+Fill (1)

    30/35

  • 7/28/2019 Counter+Fort++Reatining+WAll+With+HORZONTAL+Bach+Fill (1)

    31/35

  • 7/28/2019 Counter+Fort++Reatining+WAll+With+HORZONTAL+Bach+Fill (1)

    32/35

  • 7/28/2019 Counter+Fort++Reatining+WAll+With+HORZONTAL+Bach+Fill (1)

    33/35

    M-10 M-15 M-20 M-25 M-30 M-35 M-40

    (N/mm2) Kg/m2

    (N/mm2) Kg/m2

    M 10 3.0 300 2.5 250

    M 15 5.0 500 4.0 400

    M 20 7.0 700 5.0 500

    M 25 8.5 850 6.0 600

    M 30 10.0 1000 8.0 800

    M 35 11.5 1150 9.0 900

    M 40 13.0 1300 10.0 1000

    M 45 14.5 1450 11.0 1100M 50 16.0 1600 12.0 1200

    M-10 M-15 M-20 M-25 M-30 M-35 M-40

    Grade of concrete M-15 M-20 M-25 M-30 M-35 M-40

    Modular Ratio 18.67 13.33 10.98 9.33 8.11 7.18

    scbc N/mm2 5 7 8.5 10 11.5 13

    m scbc 93.33 93.33 93.33 93.33 93.33 93.33

    kc 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4

    jc 0.867 0.867 0.867 0.867 0.867 0.867

    Rc 0.867 1.214 1.474 1.734 1.994 2.254

    Pc (%) 0.714 1 1.214 1.429 1.643 1.857

    kc 0.329 0.329 0.329 0.329 0.329 0.329

    jc 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89

    Rc 0.732 1.025 1.244 1.464 1.684 1.903

    Pc (%) 0.433 0.606 0.736 0.866 0.997 1.127

    kc 0.289 0.289 0.289 0.289 0.289 0.289

    jc 0.904 0.904 0.904 0.904 0.904 0.904Rc 0.653 0.914 1.11 1.306 1.502 1.698

    Pc (%) 0.314 0.44 0.534 0.628 0.722 0.816

    kc 0.253 0.253 0.253 0.253 0.253 0.253

    jc 0.916 0.916 0.916 0.914 0.916 0.916

    Rc 0.579 0.811 0.985 1.159 1.332 1.506

    Pc (%) 0.23 0.322 0.391 0.46 0.53 0.599

    Table 1.15. PERMISSIBLE DIRECT TENSILE STRESS

    Grade of concrete

    2.8 3.2 3.6 4.0 4.4

    Table 1.16.. Permissible stress in concrete (IS : 456-2000)

    Tensile stress N/mm2 1.2 2.0

    Grade of

    concrete

    Permission stress in compression (N/mm2) Permissible stress in bond (Average) for

    plain bars in tention (N/mm2)Bending acbc Direct (acc)

    (N/mm2) in kg/m2

    -- --

    0.6 60

    0.8 80

    0.9 90

    1.0 100

    1.1 110

    1.2 120

    1.3 1301.4 140

    Table 1.18. MODULAR RATIO

    Grade of concrete

    Modular ratio m31

    (31.11)

    19

    (18.67)

    13

    (13.33)

    11

    (10.98)

    9

    (9.33)

    8

    (8.11)

    7

    (7.18)

    Table 2.1. VALUES OF DESIGN CONSTANTS

    (a) sst =

    140

    N/mm2

    (Fe 250)

    (b) sst =

    190

    N/mm2

    (d) sst =

    275

    N/mm2

    (Fe 500)

    (c ) sst =

    230N/mm2

    (Fe 415)

  • 7/28/2019 Counter+Fort++Reatining+WAll+With+HORZONTAL+Bach+Fill (1)

    34/35

    M-15 M-20 M-25 M-30 M-35 M-40

    0.18 0.18 0.19 0.20 0.20 0.20

    0.22 0.22 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23

    0.29 0.30 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.32

    0.34 0.35 0.36 0.37 0.37 0.38

    0.37 0.39 0.40 0.41 0.42 0.42

    0.40 0.42 0.44 0.45 0.45 0.46

    0.42 0.45 0.46 0.48 0.49 0.49

    0.44 0.47 0.49 0.50 0.52 0.52

    0.44 0.49 0.51 0.53 0.54 0.55

    0.44 0.51 0.53 0.55 0.56 0.57

    0.44 0.51 0.55 0.57 0.58 0.60

    0.44 0.51 0.56 0.58 0.60 0.62

    0.44 0.51 0.57 0.6 0.62 0.63

    300 or more 275 250 225 200 175 50 or less

    1.00 1.05 1.10 1.15 1.20 1.25 1.30

    M-15 M-20 M-25 M-30 M-35 M-40

    1.6 1.8 1.9 2.2 2.3 2.5

    Grade of concrete M-10 M-15 M-20 M-25 M-30 M-35 M-40 M-45 M-50

    tbd (N / mm2) -- 0.6 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4

    tbd (N / mm2) tbd (N / mm2)

    M 15

    M 20

    M 25

    M 30

    M 35

    M 40M 45

    M 50

    Table 3.1. Permissible shear stress Table tc in concrete (IS : 456-2000)100As Permissible shear stress in concrete tc N/mm

    2

    bd

    < 0.15

    0.25

    0.50

    0.75

    1.00

    1.25

    1.50

    1.75

    2.00

    2.25

    2.50

    2.75

    3.00 and above

    Table 3.2. Facork

    Over all depth of slab

    k

    Table 3.3. Maximum shear stress tc.max in concrete (IS : 456-2000)

    Grade of concrete

    tc.max

    Table 3.4. Permissible Bond stress Table tbd in concrete (IS : 456-2000)

    Table 3.5. Development Length in tension

    Grade of

    concrete

    Plain M.S. Bars H.Y.S.D. Bars

    kd = LdF kd = LdF

    0.6 58 0.96

    0.9 39 1.44

    1 35 1.6

    60

    0.8 44 1.28 45

    40

    36

    33

    1.2 29 1.92 30

    1.1 32 1.76

    28

    1.4 25 2.24 26

    1.3 27 2.08

  • 7/28/2019 Counter+Fort++Reatining+WAll+With+HORZONTAL+Bach+Fill (1)

    35/35

    Degree sin cos tan tan Degree sin cos

    10 0.17 0.98 0.18 0.18 10 0.17 0.98

    11 0.19 0.98 0.19 0.19 11 0.19 0.98

    12 0.21 0.98 0.21 0.21 12 0.21 0.98

    13 0.23 0.97 0.23 0.23 13 0.23 0.97

    14 0.24 0.97 0.25 0.25 14 0.24 0.97

    15 0.26 0.97 0.27 0.27 15 0.26 0.97

    16 0.28 0.96 0.29 0.29 16 0.28 0.96

    17 0.29 0.96 0.31 0.31 17 0.29 0.96

    18 0.31 0.95 0.32 0.32 18 0.31 0.95

    19 0.33 0.95 0.34 0.34 19 0.33 0.95

    20 0.34 0.94 0.36 0.36 20 0.34 0.94

    21 0.36 0.93 0.38 0.38 21 0.36 0.93

    22 0.37 0.93 0.40 0.40 22 0.37 0.93

    23 0.39 0.92 0.42 0.42 23 0.39 0.92

    24 0.41 0.92 0.45 0.45 24 0.41 0.92

    25 0.42 0.91 0.47 0.47 25 0.42 0.91

    30 0.50 0.87 0.58 0.58 30 0.50 0.87

    35 0.57 0.82 0.70 0.70 35 0.57 0.82

    40 0.64 0.77 0.84 0.84 40 0.64 0.77

    45 0.71 0.71 1.00 1.00 45 0.71 0.71

    50 0.77 0.64 1.19 1.19 50 0.77 0.64

    55 0.82 0.57 1.43 1.43 55 0.82 0.57

    60 0.87 0.50 1.73 1.73 60 0.87 0.50

    65 0.91 0.42 2.14 2.14 65 0.91 0.42

    Value of angle Value of angle