Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
COUNTRY EFFORTS ON THE
MEASUREMENT OF DISABILITY
(PHILIPPINES)
Wilma A. Guillen
Assistant National Statistician
Social Sector Statistics Service
SSO, PSA
UN Regional Meeting on Disability Measurement and Statistics in
support of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the
2020 World Population and Housing Census Program
26-28 July 2016
Bamgkok, Thailand
Target
Indicator Proposed Tier by Agency
Revised Tier (by Secretar
iat before Mexico meeting
)
Revised Tier
(based on IAEG consulta
tions)
Philippines' Tier Classification (based on the
assessment during the workshop and consultations with source agencies) Note: same tiers
for global and national were highlighted in
yellow
4.5 By 2030, eliminate gender disparities in education and ensure equal access to all levels of education and vocational training for the vulnerable, including persons with disabilities, indigenous peoples and children in vulnerable situations
4.5.1 Parity indices (female/male, rural/urban, bottom/top wealth quintile and others such as disability status, indigenous peoples and conflict-affected, as data become available) for all education indicators on this list that can be disaggregated
Tier I Tier I/II/III-depending on indice
Tier I/II/III depending on index
1 (female/male, rural/urban);
2 (bottom/top wealth quintile and
others such as disability status,
indigenous peoples and conflict-
affected)
8.5 By 2030, achieve full and productive employment and decent work for all women and men, including for young people and persons with disabilities, and equal pay for work of equal value
8.5.1 Average hourly earnings of female and male employees, by occupation, age and persons with disabilities
Tier I Tier II Tier II 3
8.5.2 Unemployment rate, by sex, age and persons with disabilities
Tier I Tier I Tier I 1 (except for disabilities)
11.2 By 2030, provide access to safe, affordable, accessible and sustainable transport systems for all, improving road safety, notably by expanding public transport, with special attention to the needs of those in vulnerable situations, women, children, persons with disabilities and older persons
11.2.1 Proportion of population that has convenient access to public transport, by sex, age and persons with disabilities
Tier II Tier II Tier II 3
11.7 By 2030, provide universal access to safe, inclusive and accessible, green and public spaces, in particular for women and children, older persons and persons with disabilities
11.7.1 Average share of the built-up area of cities that is open space for public use for all, by sex, age and persons with disabilities
Tier II Tier II Tier III 3
MEASUREMENT of Disability
1. Census of Population and Housing (CPH)
Method : Sample Survey
Measurement Tool : MDS
Collaborating Agencies : Department of Health
National Commission on Disability Affairs
Philippine Statistics Authority
WHO
Field Operation : November – December 2016
2. For The Department of Health
.Data on disability will enable planners to prepare plans for
rehabilitation, education development and preventive programs
.Tool : Two questions included in the CPH (Modified Washington Group)
Target
Indicator Proposed Tier by Agency
Revised Tier (by Secretar
iat before Mexico meeting
)
Revised Tier
(based on IAEG consulta
tions)
Philippines' Tier Classification (based on the
assessment during the workshop and consultations with source agencies) Note: same tiers
for global and national were highlighted in
yellow
4.5 By 2030, eliminate gender disparities in education and ensure equal access to all levels of education and vocational training for the vulnerable, including persons with disabilities, indigenous peoples and children in vulnerable situations
4.5.1 Parity indices (female/male, rural/urban, bottom/top wealth quintile and others such as disability status, indigenous peoples and conflict-affected, as data become available) for all education indicators on this list that can be disaggregated
Tier I Tier I/II/III-depending on indice
Tier I/II/III depending on index
1 (female/male, rural/urban);
2 (bottom/top wealth quintile and
others such as disability status,
indigenous peoples and conflict-
affected)
8.5 By 2030, achieve full and productive employment and decent work for all women and men, including for young people and persons with disabilities, and equal pay for work of equal value
8.5.1 Average hourly earnings of female and male employees, by occupation, age and persons with disabilities
Tier I Tier II Tier II 3
8.5.2 Unemployment rate, by sex, age and persons with disabilities
Tier I Tier I Tier I 1 (except for disabilities)
11.2 By 2030, provide access to safe, affordable, accessible and sustainable transport systems for all, improving road safety, notably by expanding public transport, with special attention to the needs of those in vulnerable situations, women, children, persons with disabilities and older persons
11.2.1 Proportion of population that has convenient access to public transport, by sex, age and persons with disabilities
Tier II Tier II Tier II 3
11.7 By 2030, provide universal access to safe, inclusive and accessible, green and public spaces, in particular for women and children, older persons and persons with disabilities
11.7.1 Average share of the built-up area of cities that is open space for public use for all, by sex, age and persons with disabilities
Tier II Tier II Tier III 3
4. For The SDGs –
MEASUREMENT of Disability
3. Philippine Plan Of Action Tool (PROPOSED): : Incheon Strategy
(questions to be added in existing sample surveys
like the LFS, FIES, or DHS)
OTHER data sources : administrative data from
DSWD, PhilHealth, UNICEF-MICS,
Collaborating Agencies : National Commission on Disability Affairs
Department of Health
PSA/DSWD/Philihealth/
ESCAP
Monitoring: Inter-Agency Task Force on Disability Data Generation
(IA-TF-DDG) - YET TO CONVENE
CHAIR : NCDA
Secretariat : PSA
Question P12 For All Persons
Does _____ have any physical or mental disability?
P12 For All Persons {Disability} Does _____ have any physical or mental disability? Answer is either 1 Yes or 2 No
2010 CPH Forms Concept/Definition
CP Form 2 Common HH QRE CPH Form 3 Sample HH QRE CPH Form 4 Institutional HH QRE
Disability refers to any restriction or lack of ability (resulting from impairment) to perform an activity in any manner or within the range considered normal for a human being. Impairments associated with disabilities may be physical, mental, or sensory motor impairment such as partial or total blindness, low vision, partial or total deafness, oral defect, having only one hand/no hands, one leg/no legs, mild or severe cerebral palsy, retarded, mentally ill, mental retardation and multiple impairment.
{P13) For All 5 YO and OVER {Functional Difficulty} Does _______ have any difficulty/problem in…? a. Seeing, even when wearing eyeglasses; b. Hering, even when using a hearing aid; c. Walking or climbing steps; d. Remembering or concentrating; e. Self-caring (bathing or dressing); f. Communicating using his/her usual language Answer to each domain is either 1 Yes or 2 No
.
The 2010 CPH
{P13) For All 5 YO and OVER {Functional Difficulty} Does _______ have any
difficulty/problem in…? a. Seeing, even when wearing eyeglasses; b. Hering, even when
using a hearing aid; c. Walking or climbing steps; d. Remembering or concentrating; e. Self-
caring (bathing or dressing); f. Communicating using his/her usual language Answers to
each is either 1 Yes or 2 No
{P12) For All Persons {Disability} Does _______ have any physical or mental difficulty?
Answers is either 1 Yes or 2 No
The Questionnaires
{P12) For All Persons {Disability} Does _______ have any physical or mental difficulty?
Answers is either 1 Yes or 2 No {P13) For All 5 YO and OVER {Functional Difficulty} Does _______ have any
difficulty/problem in…? a. Seeing, even when wearing eyeglasses; b. Hering, even when
using a hearing aid; c. Walking or climbing steps; d. Remembering or concentrating; e. Self-
caring (bathing or dressing); f. Communicating using his/her usual language Answers to
each is either 1 Yes or 2 No
The Questionnaires
{P13) For All 5 YO and OVER {Functional Difficulty} Does _______ have any
difficulty/problem in…? a. Seeing, even when wearing eyeglasses; b. Hering, even when
using a hearing aid; c. Walking or climbing steps; d. Remembering or concentrating; e. Self-
caring (bathing or dressing); f. Communicating using his/her usual language Answers to
each is either 1 Yes or 2 No
{P12) For All Persons {Disability} Does _______ have any physical or mental difficulty?
Answers is either 1 Yes or 2 No
The Questionnaires
RESULTS
RESULTS
RESULTS
Household Population With and Without Disability by Age Group, Sex, Region, and Province: Philippines, 2010
Age Group, Region, and Province
Total Household Population
Total Disability
With Disability Without Disability Not Reported PHILIPPINES
Total 92,097,978 1,442,586 90,616,532 38,860
0 - 4 10,231,201 72,931 10,145,129 13,141 5 - 9 10,317,822 95,998 10,216,767 5,057 10 - 14 10,168,546 103,146 10,060,909 4,491 15 - 19 9,676,094 100,079 9,572,271 3,744 20 - 24 8,369,801 87,183 8,280,044 2,574 25 - 29 7,390,255 76,424 7,311,773 2,058 30 - 34 6,743,967 73,629 6,668,637 1,701 35 - 39 5,990,217 69,781 5,918,860 1,576 40 - 44 5,450,770 81,044 5,368,469 1,257 45 - 49 4,664,551 89,520 4,573,956 1,075 50 - 54 3,883,791 95,886 3,787,205 700 55 - 59 2,980,483 89,351 2,890,620 512 60 - 64 2,224,237 88,719 2,135,168 350 65 and over 4,006,243 318,895 3,686,724 624
SIMILAR TABLE for MALE and for FEMALE
RESULTS
RESULTS
Region, Province, and City/Municipality Total number of
households
Number of households with at least one member having any type of
functional difficulty PHILIPPINES 20,171,899 1,942,184 NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION 2,759,829 233,292 CITY OF MANILA 386,835 34,016 CITY OF MANDALUYONG 79,935 5,718 CITY OF MARIKINA 91,414 7,427 CITY OF PASIG 154,970 10,610 QUEZON CITY 634,346 52,100 CITY OF SAN JUAN 28,890 3,486 CALOOCAN CITY 345,444 38,515 CITY OF MALABON 82,546 8,667 CITY OF NAVOTAS 59,296 6,099 CITY OF VALENZUELA 137,834 13,312 CITY OF LAS PIÑAS 127,723 9,584 CITY OF MAKATI 126,457 10,222 CITY OF MUNTINLUPA 103,949 8,165 CITY OF PARAÑAQUE 137,405 11,700 PASAY CITY 97,966 5,525 PATEROS 14,629 1,093 TAGUIG CITY 150,190 7,053
Region, Province, and City/Municipality
Number of households with at least one member having functional difficulty by type
Number of households
with at least one member having
functional difficulty in
seeing
Number of households
with at least one member having
functional difficulty in
hearing
Number of households
with at least one member having
functional difficulty in
walking
Number of households
with at least one member having
functional difficulty in rememberi
ng
Number of households
with at least one member having
functional difficulty in self-caring
Number of households
with at least one member having
functional difficulty in communica
ting
PHILIPPINES 1,315,149
466,679
543,365
314,406
229,851
260,287
NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION
185,672
39,997
52,306
24,925
21,910
21,079
CITY OF MANILA 25,209
6,643
8,094
4,229
3,638
3,476
CITY OF MANDALUYONG
4,444
827
1,949
645
1,239
611
CITY OF MARIKINA 5,395
1,355
2,066
933
836
884
CITY OF PASIG 7,947
1,974
2,748
1,297
1,108
1,085
QUEZON CITY 42,088
8,170
10,812
5,703
4,898
4,648
RESULTS
GOALS
NUMBER OF INDICATORS
TIER 1 TIER 2 TIER 3 NOT APPLICABLE TOTAL
Goal 1 7 1 4 12
Goal 2 5 6 3 14
Goal 3 13 2 11 26
Goal 4 6 4 1 11
Goal 5 3 4 3 4 14
Goal 6 1 2 6 2 11
Goal 7 2 2 2 6
Goal 8 9 1 5 2 17
Goal 9 6 1 5 12
Goal 10 2 4 4 1 11
Goal 11 6 6 3 15
Goal 12 1 3 9 13
Goal 13 3 0 2 2 7
Goal 14 1 3 5 1 10
Goal 15 10 1 1 2 14
Goal 16 6 10 5 2 23
Goal 17 15 1 1 8 25
TOTAL 96 (40%) 51 (21%) 70 (29%) 24 (10%) 241
Assessment of SDG Indicators
(DISABILITY in the 2030 Agenda)
Assessment of SDG Indicators
(DISABILITY in the 2030 Agenda)
Indicator 4.5.1 Parity indices (female/male, rural/urban, bottom/top wealth quintile and
others such as disability status, indigenous peoples and conflict-affected, as data become
available) for all education indicators on this list that can be disaggregated
Revised Tier (by Secretariat before Mexico meeting) - Tier I/II/III depending in indice
Revised Tier (based on IAEG consultations) - Tier I/II/III depending on index
Country assessment - 1 (female/male, rural/urban);
2 (bottom/top wealth quintile and others such as disability status, indigenous
peoples and conflict-affected)
Availability of Baseline data : National/Regiona/Provincial , by Sex
Who are the agencies responsible for data collection / data sources - DepEd, CHED, TESDA, NCDA, NCIP, NDRRMC, PSA Who are the accountable agencies / others for the achievement of this target- DepEd,
CHED, TESDA
Assessment of SDG Indicators
(DISABILITY in the 2030 Agenda)
Indicator 4.5.1 Parity indices (female/male, rural/urban, bottom/top wealth quintile
and others such as disability status, indigenous peoples and conflict-affected, as data
become available) for all education indicators on this list that can be disaggregated
"Relevance (1-PDP, 2-not in PDP but relevant, 3-not aware of govt projects
using this indicator, 4- not applicable in the Philippines - 2
"Priority (for Tier 2 and 3 indicators only)Yes/No : YES
What level/s of disaggregation are needed to make the indicator more
relevant to the Philippines, aside from those cited in the global indicator?
(1-Sex, 2-Age, 3-Geographic location (u/r) , 4-Migratory Status, 5-Ethnicity,
6-Disability, 7-Income) (col. 16) - 1,2,3, 6
17
SDG Workplan
Target Date Activity April 12, 2016 PSA Technical Staff Meeting
April 21, 2016 PSA-NEDA Workshop
May 11-12, 2016 Multi-Sectoral Consultative Workshop on SDGs
July 2016 Initial List of SDG Indicators for National Monitoring
July-November 2016 Sectoral Workshops/consultations on SDG Indicators a. Goal 6 – WASH Indicators (6.1 to 6.3) sponsored by
WHO (5-6 July 2016) a. World Food Program related indicators (TBA) b. Presentation of SDGs to the regions (RSC Meetings)
e.g., Regional Consultations in Selected Areas back to back with PSDP dissemination (July)
c. Consultation with IAC/TC and Source Agencies
July 11-20 2016 Presentation to High Level Political Forum on Sustainable Development (c/o NEDA)
18
SDG Workplan
Target Date Activity
August 2016 (PSA Board Meeting)
Establishment of SDG Steering Committee under the PSA Board
August 2016 Coordination with Data Sources and Identification of SDG Focal Points
September – November 2016 Formulation of metadata
October –November 2016 Consultation with relevant IAC/TC re: metadata
December 2016 Finalization of list of SDG indicators and metadata
The 2030 Agenda is a commitment of 193 countries and data support is so
much needed.
Shared country experiences in this regional meeting is rich. Most of the
countries can produce data on disability. However, there are still rooms for
improvement to make these be relevant at the country level and at the
global level. Together, let us address the comparability and data
disaggregation issue.
hope the region can develop disability questions,; for surveys; to have at
least a minimum standard tool for censuses and for surveys; and if
possible, have a GLOBAL Strategy for disability measurement for inclusive
growth
Hope we continue to collaborate in the region because there are a number
of Tier 3 SDG indicators which we can altogether develop including the
indicators on disability.
CONCLUSION
