13
Court Cases Setting Precedent Emma Kimball

Court Cases Setting Precedent

  • Upload
    inoke

  • View
    37

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Court Cases Setting Precedent. Emma Kimball. Precedent. Definition: An earlier event or action regarded as an example or guide to be considered in subsequent similar circumstances. Court case decisions have the ability to impact all further decisions relating to a particular topic. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Court Cases Setting Precedent

Court Cases Setting Precedent

Emma Kimball

Page 2: Court Cases Setting Precedent

PrecedentDefinition:

An earlier event or action regarded as an example or guide to be considered in

subsequent similar circumstances.

Page 3: Court Cases Setting Precedent

Court case decisions have the ability to impact all further

decisions relating to a particular topic.

So, the decision in one court case can change the country in

many ways

Page 4: Court Cases Setting Precedent

Griswold v. ConnecticutIn a 7-2 vote, the supreme

court decided that the constitution, under the 9th amendment, protects the

“right to privacy”This decision set precedent for many cases to

come

Page 5: Court Cases Setting Precedent
Page 6: Court Cases Setting Precedent

Some court cases affected by Griswold:

Roe v. WadePlanned Parenthood v. CaseyEisenstad v. BairdPlanned Parenthood v. DanforthSingleton v. WulffCarey v. Population Services International

Page 7: Court Cases Setting Precedent

Roe v. WadeUnder the right to privacy established in

Griswold, you cannot deny a women an abortion

Page 8: Court Cases Setting Precedent

Planned Parenthood v. CaseyAfter abortion was legalized in Roe v. Wade, the

court decided that you cannot deny a women an abortion, but a state may set regulations.

This case would have ended differently had the right to privacy never been established and abortions made legal.

Page 9: Court Cases Setting Precedent

Eisenstad v. BairdIn this case, a state law forbade single people

from receiving contraceptives.The court decided that under the right to

privacy, you cannot restrict single people only. Everyone has the right to obtain contraceptives.

Page 10: Court Cases Setting Precedent

Planned Parenthood v. Danforth

In this case, the state of Missouri had restrictions on abortion that were unconstitutional.

Under the right to privacy established in Griswold, the court decided you cannot force a women to have the fathers consent.

Page 11: Court Cases Setting Precedent

Singleton v. WulffIn Missouri, a law was passed that denied

Medicaid benefits for people receiving abortions.Under the Establishment Clause and the right to

privacy, the court deemed the Missouri law unconstitutional.

Page 12: Court Cases Setting Precedent

Carey v. Population Services International

In this case, the state of New York made it illegal for minors to purchase contraceptives.

This was deemed unconstitutional, because matters of procreation are protected by privacy rights.

Page 13: Court Cases Setting Precedent

As you can see, the decision in Griswold v. Connecticut set precedent for a large amount

of important court case decisions.

One court decision can lead to many similar decisions and

affect many things.