Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Court File No.: CV-16-125371-00
ONTARIO
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
B E T W E E N
GAVIN DOWNING, DIRECTOR APPOINTED
UNDER THE MILK ACT, R.S.O. 1990, c M.12
Applicant
- and -
AGRI-CULTURAL RENEWAL CO-OPERATIVE INC. o/a GLENCOLTON FARMS,
ELISA VANDER HOUT, MARKUS CHRISTIAN SCHMIDT, JOHANNES OSTHAUS
NIKOLAUS ALEXANDER, JOHN DOE(S), JANE DOE(S) and PERSONS UNKNOWN
Respondents
- and -
OUR FARM OUR FOOD COOPERATIVE INC.
Intervener
SUPPLEMENTARY APPLICATION RECORD (Application returnable on May 29 and 30, 2017)
Date: May 9, 2017 ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO
Crown Law Office (Civil)
8-720 Bay Street
Toronto, ON M7A 2S9
Tel.: 416-326-4086
Fax: 416-326-4181
Sunil S. Mathai, LSUC No. 49616O
Ananthan Sinnadurai, LSUC No. 60614G
Nansy Ghobrial, LSUC No. 68740N
Counsel for the applicant,
Gavin Downing, Director appointed under
the Milk Act, R.S.O. 1990, c M.12
TO: HUMMINGBIRD LAWYERS LLP
8800 Dufferin Street, Suite 301
Vaughan, Ontario, L4K 0C5
Tel.: 905-731-1911
Fax: 905.731.1913
Darren Smith, LSUC No. 49677U
Counsel to the Respondents,
Agri-Cultural Renewal Co-operative
Inc. and Markus Schmidt
AND TO: ELISA VANDER HOUT
R.R. #1, 393889 Concession 2
Durham, ON N0G 1R0
Self-represented Respondent
AND TO: NIKOLAUS OSTHAUS
R.R. #1, 394633 Concession 1 NGW
Durham, ON N0G 1R0
Self-represented Respondent
AND TO: MICHAEL SCHMIDT
R.R. #1, 393889 Concession 2
Durham, ON N0G 1R0
Self-represented Respondent
AND TO: LEWIS TAYLOR
10 Valley View Court
Kleinburg, ON L0J 1C0
Representative of the Intervener,
Our Farm Our Food Cooperative Inc.
Court File No.: CV-16-125371-00
ONTARIO
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
B E T W E E N
GAVIN DOWNING, DIRECTOR APPOINTED
UNDER THE MILK ACT, R.S.O. 1990, c M.12
Applicant
- and -
AGRI-CULTURAL RENEWAL CO-OPERATIVE INC. o/a GLENCOLTON FARMS,
ELISA VANDER HOUT, MARKUS CHRISTIAN SCHMIDT, JOHANNES OSTHAUS
NIKOLAUS ALEXANDER, JOHN DOE(S), JANE DOE(S) and PERSONS UNKNOWN
Respondents
- and -
OUR FARM OUR FOOD COOPERATIVE INC.
Intervener
INDEX
TAB DOCUMENT PAGE
1. Order of Justice Mullins, dated September 26, 2016 (re: OFOF granted leave
to intervene)
1
2. Order of Justice Mullins, dated September 26, 2016 (re: conversion of
application to action)
4
3. Endorsement of Justice Edwards, dated December 6, 2016 7
4. Exhibits to the Cross-Examination of Elisa Vander Hout held on April 20,
2017
A. Exhibit 2: Photo DCS_2206, taken June 9, 2015 11
B. Exhibit 3: Photo DCS_1994, taken June 9, 2015 12
C. Exhibit 4: Photo DCS_2147, taken June 9, 2015 13
D. Exhibit 5: Video –the Office at Glencolton Farms, dated October 2, 2015 14
5. Exhibit of the Cross-Examination of Michael Schmidt held on April 20, 2017
A. Exhibit 2: Video –edited YouTube video taken on October 2, 2017 at
Glencolton Farms
15
6. Answers to undertakings given during the Cross-Examination of Gavin
Downing, held on April 25, 2017
16
7. Answers to undertakings given during the Cross-Examination of Rock Bond,
held on April 18, 2017
20
8. Answers to undertakings given during the Cross-Examination of Glenn Jarvie,
held on April 19, 2017
21
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
(NEWMARKET)
CV-16-125371-00
THE HONOURABLE
JUSTICE MULLINS
) ) ) ) )
MONDAY, THE 26TH AND TUESDAY, THE 27TH OF
SEPTEM BER, 2016
BETWEEN: Jllllfi/111././//M
~,~tl tOURi OF. ~ #~ ~~········ .. ~u.,.;=- GAVIN DOWNING, DIRECTOR APPOINTED ~~_..-~···.~~ UNDER THE MILK ACT, R.S.0.1990, c M.12 ~ c;, : • --.. s . . .-§·· . ;:: ~ : !IU:;::: ~C')~ :u~ ~~ \ u ••• / #;~ Applicant! Responding Party
-::. ';p • • • • • • ~ '§. d ~ -rv~ :······ ~~ \~ -an -~ C'R/EU\\t t\\\\\
~"~fLY:!uLTURAL RENEWAL CO-OPERATIVE INC. o/a GLENCOLTON FARMS, ELISA VANDER HOUT, MARKUS CHRISTIAN SCHMIDT,
NIKOLAUS ALEXANDER JOHANNES OSTHAUS, JOHN DOE(S), JANE DOE(S) and PERSONS UNKNOWN
Respondents I Moving Parties
ORDER
THIS MOTION made by the proposed intervenor Our Farm, Our Food
Inc. ("OFOF") seeking leave to intervene in the within application was heard this day at
the Courthouse at 50 Eagle St. West in Newmarket, Ontario.
UPON READING the motion record of OFOF, the Book of Authorities of the
Applicant, Gavin Downing, Director appointed under the Milk Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. M. 12,
and upon hearing the oral submissions of the parties present:
1
CV-16-125371-00
1. THIS COURT ORDERS that OFOF be and is hereby granted leave to
intervene in the within application as a party, with full participation rights ;
2. THIS COURT ORDERS that OFOF be and is hereby subject to the terms
of any costs orders made by this Court during the course of the within application ;
3. THIS COURT ORDERS that OFOF has such rights of appeal as are
available to intervenors as provided under the provisions of the Courts of Justice Act,
R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43 and the Rules of Civil Procedure, R.R.O. 1990, Reg 194;
4. THIS COURT ORDERS that leave is granted to OFOF to be represented
in the within application by Lewis Taylor, a non-lawyer; and,
5. THIS COURT ORDERS that no costs be awarded for this motion.
Mullins J.
, .. ,.... .. ENTERED AT I INSCRIT A NEWMARKET '}
f~~~ ........................... ..J...q .. ::::. NOV 17 2016
\', OOCUMENTNo. ~n- 2-~ 'I N rANTOUEDOCU7'Vi;~""" u UY, f>l\~ ............. S$ t!U t . <tU II IU IIII U tiUit tttUI
2
GA
VIN
DO
WN
ING
, D
IRE
CT
OR
A
PP
OIN
TE
D U
ND
ER
TH
E M
ILK
AC
T,
R.S
.O.
1990
, c.
M.
12
App
lican
t!Res
pond
in
CV
-16-
1253
71-0
0
AG
RI-
CU
LT
UR
AL
RE
NE
WA
L C
O-O
PE
RA
TIV
E I
NC
., o/
a G
LEN
CO
LTO
N
-an
d-
FA
RM
S, e
t al.
Res
pond
ents
/ Mov
ina
Par
ties
ON
TA
RIO
S
UP
ER
IOR
CO
UR
T O
F J
US
TIC
E
Pro
ceed
ings
com
men
ced
at N
ewm
arke
t
OR
DE
R
AT
TO
RN
EY
GE
NE
RA
L O
F O
NT
AR
IO
Cro
wn
Law
Offi
ce -
Civ
il La
w
8-72
0 B
ay S
tree
t T
oron
to,
ON
M
7A 2
89
F
ax:
416-
326-
4181
Su
nil
Ma
tha
i (L
SU
C N
o. 4
96
16
0)
Tel
: 41
6-32
6-40
86
An
an
tha
n S
inn
ad
ura
i (LS
UC
No.
606
14G
: T
el:
416-
314-
2540
Cou
nsel
for
the
appl
ican
t/res
pond
ing
part
y, G
avin
Dow
ning
, D
irect
or a
ppoi
nted
un
der
the
Milk
Act
, R
.S.O
. 199
0, c
M.1
2
3
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
(NEWMARKET)
CV-16-125371-00
THE HONOURABLE
JUSTICE MULLINS
MONDAY, THE 26TH AND TUESDAY, THE 27TH OF
SEPTEM BER, 2016
BETWEEN:
GAVIN DOWNING, DIRECTOR APPOINTED UNDER THE MILK ACT, R.S.O. 1990, c M.12
Applicant I Responding Party -and -
AGRI-CULTURAL RENEWAL COuOPERATIVE INC. ola GLENCOL TON FARMS, ELISA VANDER HOUT, MARKUS CHRISTIAN SCHMIDT,
NIKOLAUS ALEXANDER JOHANNES OSTHAUS, JOHN DOE(S), JANE DOE(S) and PERSONS UNKNOWN
Respondents I Moving Parties
ORDER
THIS MOTION made by the Respondents for an Order converting this
application to an action was heard this day at the Courthouse at 50 Eagle St. West in
Newmarket, Ontario .
UPON READING the motion record , factum and book of authorities of the
Respondents, and the responding motion record, factum and book of authorities of the
applicant, Gavin Downing, Director appointed under the Milk Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. M. 12,
and upon consent of the parties:
4
CV-16-125371 -00
1. THIS COURT ORDERS that the motion by the respondents to convert the
within application into an action be and is hereby withdrawn, without prejudice to the
Respondents' right to bring a further motion for the relief sought;
2. THIS COURT ORDERS that the costs of this motion are payable by the
Respondents to the applicant, Gavin Downing, Director Appointed Under The Mill< Act,
R.S.O. 1990, c M.12, in any event of the cause, if requested; and ,
3. THIS COURT ORDERS that no costs are awarded against the intervenor,
Our Farm, Our Food Inc., in respect of this motion.
Mullins J .
ENTER-EDAT7iNsCAiTr NEW:.:12 'lOOK l iVRE................. ~ ...
NOV 17 2016 ~0 DOCUMENT~
010 a I·N TANTQUEOOCTJ"i\,/!:~--.....
d nv /PAR ............................ . f ""'"'''''''''"'
5
GA
VIN
DO
WN
ING
, D
IRE
CT
OR
A
PP
OIN
TE
D U
ND
ER
TH
E M
ILK
AC
T,
R.S
.O.
199
0, c
. M
. 12
CV
- 16-
12
53
71
-00
AG
RI-
CU
LT
UR
AL
RE
NE
WA
L C
O-O
PE
RA
TIV
E I
NC
., o
/a G
LE
NC
OL
TO
N
-an
d-
FA
RM
S, e
t a
l.
Re
soo
nd
en
ts/
Mo
vin
a P
art
ies
ON
TA
RIO
S
UP
ER
IOR
CO
UR
T O
F J
US
TIC
E
Pro
cee
din
gs
com
me
nce
d a
t N
ew
ma
rke
t
OR
DE
R
AT
TO
RN
EY
GE
NE
RA
L O
F O
NT
AR
IO
Cro
wn
La
w O
ffic
e -
Civ
il L
aw
8
-72
0 B
ay
Str
ee
t T
oro
nto
, O
N
M7
A 2
89
F
ax:
41
6-3
26
-41
81
Su
nil M
ath
ai
(LS
UC
No.
49
61
60
) T
el:
4
16
-32
6-4
08
6
An
an
iha
n S
inn
ad
ura
i (L
SU
C N
o. 6
06
14
G:
Tel
: 4
16
-31
4-2
54
0
Co
un
sel f
or
the
ap
plic
ant/
resp
on
din
g
part
y, G
avi
n D
ow
nin
g,
Dir
ect
or
ap
po
int e
d u
nd
er
the
Milk
Act
, R
.S.O
. 19
90,
c M
.12
6
CITATION: Regional Municipality of York v. Michael Schmidt eta!., 2016 ONSC 7580 COURT FILE NO.: CV-16-125371-00
cv -16-125250-00 DATE: December 6, 2016
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE- ONTARIO
RE: GAVIN DOWNING, DIRECTOR APPOINTED UNDER THE MILK ACT, R.S.O. 1990, c. M.l2, Applicant
AND:
AGRI-CULTURAL RENEWAL CO-OPERATIVE INC. o/a GLENCOLTON FARMS, ELISA VANDER ROUT, MARKUS CHRISTIAN SCHMIDT, NIKOLAUS ALEXANDER JOHANNES OSTHAUS, JOE DOE(S), JANE DOE(S), and PERSONS UNKNOWN, Respondents
AND:
THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK, Applicant
AND:
MICHAEL SCHMIDT, ELlS VANDER ROUT, MARKUS CHRISTIAN SCHMIDT, AGRI-CULTURAL RENEWAL CO-OPERATIVE INC., NIKOLAUS ALEXANDER JOHANNES OSTHAUS, JOHN DOE, JANE DOE and PERSONS UNKNOWN and THE CHURCH OF THE CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY IN CANADA, Respondents
BEFORE: Justice M.L. Edwards
COUNSEL: Douglas 0. Smith, Counsel for the Regional Municipality of York Sunil Mathai, Counsel for the Ministry of the Attorney General Darren Smith, Counsel for the Defendant Agri-Cultural Renewal Co-Operative Inc. and The Church of the Christian Community in Canada Davin Charney, Counsel for Markus Schmidt Lewis Taylor, Self-Represented Michael Schmidt, Self-Represented
HEARD: In Writing
7
ENDORSEMENT
[1] I am in receipt of various pieces of correspondence from counsel and the parties addressing the chronology in the above-noted matters. As I indicated to counsel and the parties in our last case conference call, I would be conducting a form of "baseball arbitration" in the fixing of the timetable.
[2] Given the lapse of time since the various communications and my delay in response, largely caused as a result of my involvement in a criminal trial, I have made some minor alterations to the timetable proposed in Mr. Smith's letter to me of November 7, 2016. I have considered the various representations made by Mr. Taylor, as well as Darren Smith's letter to me of November 4, 2016.
[3] This case has been outstanding for some considerable period of time and, in my view, the timetable proposed in Mr. Smith's letter is the one that will bring about the most timely, fair and orderly conclusion to these proceedings. The timetable that the parties will therefore comply with is set forth as follows:
Remaining Steps to be Completed Deadline for Completion
Motions re production of documents to be On or before January 10, 2017, subject to heard in writing or via teleconference by availability of Justice Edwards Justice Edwards
Respondents and OFOF serve and file motion material re challenge of On or before January 15, 2017 admissibility of evidence obtained during search of the Farm ("s. 8 Motion")
Applicants serve and file any material in On or before January 27, 2017 response to the s. 8 Motion
Cross-examinations on affidavit material On or before February 14, 2017 served in respect of the s. 8 Motion
Facta served and filed by Respondents and On or before February 21,2017 OFOF in respect of the s. 8 Motion
Facta served and filed by Applicants Ill On or before February 28, 2017 respect of the s. 8 Motion
Hearing of the s. 8 Motion March of 2017, subject to Court availability for a one day motion
Delivery of Responding Application materials by the Respondents and On or before March 31, 2017 Intervener
8
Delivery of any Reply Material by the On or before April 7, 2017 Director and the Region
Cross-examinations on affidavit material in On or before April 14, 2017 respect of the Application
Delivery of facta of Region and Director in By April18, 2017 respect of the Application
Delivery of facta of Respondents and By April 21, 2017 OFOF in respect of the Application
Hearing of the Applications May Sittings
Respondents and OFOF deliver Notice of Constitutional Question "NCQ", and all ByMay31,2017 evidence to be relied on in support of the NCQ, if necessary
Delivery of material in response to NCQ On or before July 30, 2017
Delivery of material m reply by On or before August 15,2017 Respondents and OFOF
Completion of all cross-examinations re On or before August 31, 2017 NCQ
Service of factum and authorities of On or before September 22, 2017 Respondents and OFOF re NCQ
Service factum and authorities in response On or before October 20, 2017 toNCQ
Hearing of Motion re NCQ November 2017 Trial Sittings
[ 4] With respect to any motion for productions that I have indicated should be completed before January 10, 2017, if there are any issues in this regard I will deal with them by teleconference at a time to be arranged through my assistant Diane Massey, at [email protected]. As for the hearing of the s. 8 motion, the parties are to consult amongst themselves and provide me with three dates during the month of March 2017 that can be agreed upon, and I will endeavour to ensure that the Court makes available a day that reflects one of the three dates that the parties have agreed upon. Similarly, with respect to the hearing of the applications and the hearing of the motion regarding NCQ to be heard respectively during the May and November sittings, counsel and the parties are to consult and provide me with three dates during the May and November sittings and I will endeavour to ensure that the Court has availability for one of the dates selected by you.
9
[ 5] If there are any other issues that are not addressed by the timetable or anything else that arises that may require further case management, please let me know and we will arrange an 8:30a.m. telephone conference to address those concerns.
Justice M.L. Edwards
Date: December 6, 2016
10
11
12
13
Tab 4D:
CD containing Exhibit 5: Video –the Office at Glencolton Farms, dated October 2, 2015
14
Tab 5A:
CD containing Exhibit 2: Video –edited YouTube video taken on October 2, 2017 at Glencolton Farms
15
Cro
ss-E
xam
inat
ion
of G
avin
Dow
ning
– A
pril
25, 2
017
Und
erta
king
s:
No.
Q
uest
ion
Ans
wer
1.
To p
rovi
de a
cop
y of
a li
cenc
ing
pack
age
refe
rred
to in
pa
ragr
aph
8 of
Dow
ning
Aff
idav
it.
A c
opy
of th
e lic
enci
ng p
acka
ge p
rovi
ded
to a
pplic
ants
is
atta
ched
at T
ab A
. In
the
even
t an
appl
ican
t exp
ress
es a
n in
tere
st in
pro
cess
ing
dairy
pr
oduc
ts o
n si
te, t
he a
pplic
ant i
s pro
vide
d w
ith a
slig
htly
m
odifi
ed c
over
ing
lette
r and
OM
AFR
A’s
Gui
delin
es fo
r on-
farm
da
iry p
roce
ssin
g. C
opie
s of b
oth
docu
men
ts a
re a
ttach
ed a
t Tab
B
.
2.
To
adv
ise
the
rele
vant
sect
ion
in th
e M
ilk A
ct, w
hich
re
gula
tes t
he sa
fety
of m
ilk.
Elem
ents
of f
ood
safe
ty a
re p
rese
nt in
man
y as
pect
s of t
he M
ilk
Act a
nd re
gula
tions
mad
e un
der t
here
unde
r.
Sect
ion
2 of
the
Act
, whi
ch se
ts o
ut th
e pu
rpos
e of
the
Act
, say
s in
par
t:
2. T
he p
urpo
se a
nd in
tent
of t
his A
ct is
, …
(c
) to
prov
ide
for t
he c
ontro
l and
regu
latio
n in
any
or a
ll re
spec
ts o
f the
qua
lity
of m
ilk, m
ilk p
rodu
cts a
nd fl
uid
milk
pr
oduc
ts w
ithin
Ont
ario
. R
.S.O
. 199
0, c
. M.1
2, s.
2.
With
in th
e A
ct, l
icen
cing
and
per
mit
requ
irem
ents
set o
ut in
ss
15 a
nd 1
6 es
tabl
ish
a ba
se fo
r whi
ch fo
od sa
fety
in a
pla
nt is
ac
hiev
ed. F
urth
er, s
afet
y re
quire
men
ts m
ay b
e im
pose
d un
der
seve
ral p
arag
raph
s und
er s
19(1
) of t
he A
ct.
The
Act
als
o em
pow
ers t
he O
ntar
io F
arm
Pro
duct
s Mar
ketin
g
16
Com
mis
sion
with
regu
latio
n m
akin
g po
wer
s. O
.Reg
761
co
ntai
ns se
vera
l pro
visi
ons t
hat g
over
n fo
od sa
fety
at a
pla
nt,
incl
udin
g: p
lant
con
stru
ctio
n (s
77)
; pla
nt e
quip
men
t (ss
78-
79);
proc
essi
ng in
a p
lant
(ss 8
0-81
); pa
steu
rizat
ion
requ
irem
ents
for
spec
ific
prod
ucts
(ss 8
2-85
); cl
eani
ng (s
86)
; and
the
plan
t lic
enci
ng a
nd p
erm
ittin
g pr
oces
s (ss
95-
102,
109
). Fu
rther
, cl
ause
100
(1)(
f) p
rovi
des t
hat t
he D
irect
or m
ay re
fuse
to is
sue
or
rene
w a
lice
nce
for t
he o
pera
tion
of a
pla
nt “
whe
re th
e ap
plic
ant
does
not
com
ply
with
the
Hea
lth P
rote
ctio
n an
d Pr
omot
ion
Act
an
d th
e re
gula
tions
ther
eund
er”.
Ju
stic
e Te
tley,
in h
is d
ecis
ion
on R
v S
chm
idt,
2011
ON
CJ 4
82,
reco
gniz
ed th
at th
e pu
rpos
e of
the
Milk
Act
, in
part,
is th
e sa
fety
an
d qu
ality
of m
ilk p
rodu
cts:
74 …
In su
ppor
t of t
his c
onte
ntio
n th
e A
ttorn
ey G
ener
al
subm
its b
oth
the
H.P
.P.A
. and
the
Milk
Act
are
dire
cted
, at
leas
t in
part,
to th
e re
gula
tion
of th
e sa
fety
and
qua
lity
of m
ilk p
rodu
cts i
n O
ntar
io. T
he H
.P.P
.A. h
as a
s its
br
oade
r obj
ectiv
e th
e pr
even
tion
of th
e sp
read
of d
isea
se
and
the
prom
otio
n an
d pr
otec
tion
of th
e he
alth
of t
he
peop
le o
f Ont
ario
. The
Milk
Act
als
o co
ntai
ns le
gisl
ated
di
rect
ives
gov
erni
ng a
ll as
pect
s of t
he p
rodu
ctio
n an
d m
arke
ting
of m
ilk a
nd m
ilk p
rodu
cts i
n th
e pr
ovin
ce.
Dep
endi
ng o
n th
e na
ture
of t
he is
sues
at h
and,
oth
er p
rovi
sion
s of
the
Milk
Act
and
the
regu
latio
ns th
ereu
nder
may
be
appl
icab
le.
17
Und
er A
dvis
emen
ts:
No.
Q
uest
ion
Ans
wer
1.
To p
rovi
de a
cop
y of
the
regu
lato
ry c
ompl
ianc
e au
dit
chec
klis
t. A
cop
y of
the
com
plia
nce
audi
t che
cklis
t is a
ttach
ed a
t Tab
C.
2.
To
adv
ise
whe
re in
the
HPP
A th
ere
is re
fere
nce
to th
e qu
ality
of m
ilk a
nd m
ilk p
rodu
cts.
Sect
ion
2 of
the
Hea
lth P
rote
ctio
n an
d Pr
omot
ion
Act (
HPP
A)
sets
out
the
purp
ose
of th
e A
ct a
s fol
low
s:
Pu
rpos
e 2.
The
pur
pose
of t
his A
ct is
to p
rovi
de fo
r the
or
gani
zatio
n an
d de
liver
y of
pub
lic h
ealth
pro
gram
s and
se
rvic
es, t
he p
reve
ntio
n of
the
spre
ad o
f dis
ease
and
the
prom
otio
n an
d pr
otec
tion
of th
e he
alth
of t
he p
eopl
e of
O
ntar
io.
R.S
.O. 1
990,
c. H
.7, s
. 2.
Sect
ions
13,
16,
17
and
18 o
f HPP
A a
lso
addr
ess t
he sa
fety
and
qu
ality
of f
ood
prod
ucts
, inc
ludi
ng m
ilk.
Furth
er R
egul
atio
n 56
2 to
the
HPP
A re
gula
tes f
ood
prem
ises
. Sec
tion
42-5
3 of
R
egul
atio
n 56
2 se
t out
spec
ific
requ
irem
ents
in re
latio
n to
milk
an
d m
ilk p
rodu
cts.
D
epen
ding
on
the
natu
re o
f the
issu
e at
han
d, o
ther
pro
visi
ons o
f th
e H
PPA
and
the
regu
latio
ns th
ereu
nder
may
be
appl
icab
le.
3.
To p
rovi
de a
job
desc
riptio
n fo
r a d
airy
pla
nt sp
ecia
list.
A p
ositi
on d
escr
iptio
n re
port
for D
airy
Pla
nt S
peci
alis
t is
atta
ched
at T
ab D
.
4.
To
look
thro
ugh
Dire
ctor
Dow
ning
’s re
cord
s to
see
if he
is
abl
e to
loca
te th
e in
form
atio
n he
rece
ived
from
the
Ont
ario
Pub
lic H
ealth
that
info
rm O
ntar
io’s
regu
lato
ry
effo
rts a
nd p
rodu
ce c
opie
s of s
ame.
Whi
le n
ot c
once
ding
the
rele
vanc
e of
the
ques
tion,
Dire
ctor
D
owni
ng h
as se
arch
ed h
is fi
les a
nd h
as c
onfir
med
that
he
rece
ived
a su
mm
ary
of il
lnes
s ass
ocia
ted
with
the
cons
umpt
ion
of ra
w m
ilk o
n O
ctob
er 8
, 201
5. A
cop
y of
the
sum
mar
y is
at
tach
ed a
t Tab
E.
18
Ref
usal
s:
No.
Q
uest
ion
Ans
wer
1.
Adv
ise
in 2
006,
who
in th
e M
inis
ter’
s off
ice
Dire
ctor
D
owni
ng re
porte
d to
. D
irect
or D
owni
ng d
id n
ot re
port
to th
e M
inis
ter’
s off
ice
in 2
006
on th
e da
iry fi
le.
2.
A
dvis
e in
200
6, w
ho in
cab
inet
off
ice
did
Dire
ctor
D
owni
ng re
port
to.
Dire
ctor
Dow
ning
did
not
repo
rt to
Cab
inet
off
ice
in 2
006
on th
e da
iry fi
le.
3.
R
efer
ence
to V
ol 3
of M
icha
el S
chm
idt’s
Res
pond
ing
reco
rd, T
ab H
, pg
6, 3
rd p
arag
raph
– re
fere
nce
to a
ch
ange
in a
ppro
ach
by re
gula
tory
age
ncie
s in
2007
in
the
Aff
idav
it of
Jam
es M
cLar
en. I
s tha
t in
refe
renc
e to
D
irect
or D
owni
ng?
Ref
used
– w
itnes
s can
not s
peak
to w
hat J
ames
McL
aren
was
re
fere
ncin
g in
his
Aff
idav
it.
4.
R
efer
ring
to th
e ar
ticle
foun
d at
Exh
ibit
I of D
irect
or
Dow
ning
’s A
ffid
avit
– ev
eryt
hing
in th
at a
rticl
e is
he
arsa
y, c
orre
ct?
The
artic
le fo
und
at E
xhib
it I t
o D
irect
or D
owni
ng’s
Aff
idav
it is
he
arsa
y.
5.
D
oes D
irect
or D
owni
ng re
gula
te a
ll fa
rmer
s?
Ref
used
– n
ot re
leva
nt to
the
Dire
ctor
’s A
pplic
atio
n an
d th
e qu
estio
n, a
s fra
med
, is o
verly
bro
ad.
6.
Is
ther
e a
dist
inct
ion
betw
een
priv
ate
indi
vidu
als a
nd th
e ge
nera
l pub
lic a
s far
as D
irect
or D
owni
ng o
r OM
AFR
A
is c
once
rned
with
resp
ect t
o th
e en
forc
emen
t of t
he M
ilk
Act a
nd th
e R
egul
atio
ns?
The
defin
ition
s of “
plan
t” a
nd “
proc
essi
ng”
unde
r the
Act
are
br
oad
and
appl
y irr
espe
ctiv
e of
who
acc
ess m
ilk o
r milk
pr
oduc
ts.
As f
ound
by
the
Cou
rt of
App
eal i
n R.
v. S
chm
idt,
“[t]h
e M
ilk A
ct m
akes
no
exce
ptio
n fo
r “pr
ivat
e” o
pera
tions
” (s
ee p
ara.
27)
.
7.
To
hav
e D
irect
or D
owni
ng c
onta
ct th
e ch
ief m
edic
al
offic
er’s
off
ice,
ask
for t
he so
urce
s of i
nfor
mat
ion
that
is
cont
aine
d in
Dr.
Will
iam
’s m
emo
of N
ovem
ber 1
0,
2015
, and
pro
duce
sam
e if
rece
ived
.
Ref
used
– n
ot re
leva
nt to
the
Dire
ctor
’s A
pplic
atio
n.
8.
To
adv
ise
whe
ther
Dire
ctor
Dow
ning
is a
war
e of
oth
er
unlic
ense
d fa
cilit
ies o
pera
ting
in O
ntar
io.
Whi
le n
ot c
once
ding
the
rele
vanc
e of
the
ques
tion,
Dire
ctor
D
owni
ng is
aw
are
of o
ther
unl
icen
ced
faci
litie
s in
Ont
ario
.
19
Cro
ss-E
xam
inat
ion
of R
ick
Bon
d –
Apr
il 18
, 201
7
Und
erta
king
s:
No.
Q
uest
ion
Ans
wer
1.
To a
dvis
e as
to w
ho c
omm
issi
ons M
r. B
ond’
s Aff
idav
it.
Mr.
Bon
d’s A
ffid
avit
was
com
mis
sion
ed S
hann
on D
eLes
kie
(cou
nsel
with
OM
AFR
A).
Ms.
DeL
eski
e co
mm
issi
oned
all
thre
e af
fidav
its fi
led
in su
ppor
t of t
he D
irect
or’s
app
licat
ion.
20
Cro
ss-E
xam
inat
ion
of G
lenn
Jar
vie
– A
pril
19, 2
017
Und
erta
king
s:
No.
Q
uest
ion
Ans
wer
1.
To re
view
Exh
ibit
F to
Mr.
Jarv
ie’s
Aff
idav
it an
d co
nfirm
the
date
of t
he tr
ansf
er o
f Lot
s 48
& 4
9 fr
om
Schm
idt t
o Sc
hilly
.
Mr.
Jarv
ie h
as re
view
ed T
ab F
and
con
firm
s tha
t the
dat
e of
the
trans
fer i
s Sep
tem
ber 2
2, 1
993.
21
GAVIN DOWNING, DIRECTOR APPOINTED
UNDER THE MILK ACT, R.S.O. 1990, c M.12
Applicant
- and -
Court File No.: CV-16-125371-00
AGRI-CULTURAL RENEWAL CO-OPERATIVE INC. o/a GLENCOLTON
FARMS, ELISA VANDER HOUT, MARKUS CHRISTIAN SCHMIDT, JOHANNES
OSTHAUS NIKOLAUS ALEXANDER, JOHN DOE(S), JANE DOE(S) AND
PERSONS UNKNOWN
Respondents
ONTARIO
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
PROCEEDINGS COMMENCED AT
NEWMARKET
SUPPLEMENTARY APPLICATION
RECORD
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO
Crown Law Office (Civil)
8-720 Bay Street
Toronto, ON M7A 2S9
Tel. 416-326-4086
Fax: 416-326-4181
Sunil Mathai, LSUC No. 49616O
Ananthan Sinnadurai, LSUC No. 60614G
Nansy Ghobrial, LSUC No. 68740N
Counsel for the applicant,
Gavin Downing, Director appointed under
the Milk Act, R.S.O. 1990, c M.12
