Dear Professor Uselmann,

The issue at stake for m third essay was the fact that though many mythical figures in the

world are great, they have flaws as well. My claim was made by Andres Segovia’s flaw of not

properly teaching his students by being mentally abusive to them. Fortunately for my paper, what

I believe that I have done well when writing about this topic was when I had talked about why

Segovia deserved his mythical status of being great. This is a topic I know well about, so I was

able to think and write about that quite easily. Unfortunately, I had trouble comparing my second

essay to this one. It was difficult finding a bridge that connected the Dark Knight to Segovia and

his playing. I believe that I had trouble connecting his flaw to his greatness as well. If I had more

time to write, I would have definitely pondered more about these ideas and improve upon them.

The revision process was quite fun because I had a feeling that I knew what I had to

revise. This was because I was work shopped on for my first draft of this essay. After getting

information from my peers, it seemed that there was more of a light at the end of the tunnel.

For the semester as a whole, I learned a lot. Though I am nowhere near perfection in the

college writing setting, I have gotten a glimpse of what it should look like and the differences of

it from a high school paper. From the three papers that we had wrote, I have found out what I

need to start looking for when writing about certain topics in a more interesting and enjoyable

manner. Overall, I feel that I have learned a lot in freshmen writing seminar and feel that I have

the ability to write enjoyable papers with ease for other classes at Eastman.

-Sung Min Lee