Upload
lang
View
48
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
CRESP Sponsored Research. RNL 04: Biomonitoring as a Means for Acquisition of Site-Specific Transfer Parameters for Nuclides of Concern and Their Application in Demonstrating Protection. Objective of research Fill hidden data gaps - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
CRESP Sponsored Research
RNL 04: Biomonitoring as a Means for Acquisition of Site-Specific Transfer Parameters for Nuclides of Concern and Their Application in Demonstrating Protection
•Overview
•Objective of research• Fill hidden data gaps•Generate scientifically robust radionuclide transfer factors
for use in dose assessments•How it benefits DOE EM•Defensible, cost-effective waste management decisions
•Ongoing efforts•Modeling•Uptake studies• Field studies
•Current OSU Team
•Post doc (David Bytwerk)•PhD candidate (Liz Houser, RHP)•PhD student (Mary Leonard, Radio/AnalChem)•MS students – Jonathan Napier (RHP), Margaret Myers (RHP), •BS students – Jenelle Parsons (Honors BS NE); Jesse Whitlow
(BS RHP)
*Not all funded on CRESP, but part of radioecology research group
Leverage works…….
•Research Efforts
•David Bytwerk – foliar translocation; eco dosimetry• Liz Houser – foliar translocation, ecosystem processes•Mary Leonard – Tc 99 chemistry• Jonathan Napier – Hanford transfer factors •Margaret Myers – GIS and ecological dose calculations• Jenelle Parsons – Uranium transfer factors• Jesse Whitlow - Bioturbation
•Hanford Sampling
• 250 samples from terrestrial, aquatic, riparian environment • Scoping study• INAA, HPGe• Anthropogenic nuclides• Natural nuclides• Stable elements• Species including
• Lupin• Knapweed• Nightshade• Prickly lettuce• Bunchgrass• Cricket• Spider• Pondweed• Lupin• Northern Pike Minnow• Cheat grass
• Determine concentration ratios and elemental concentrations
•Translocation• Experimental studies in radionuclide transfer in plants
•Root vs leaf uptake
• Fukushima Dai-ichi events have emphasized importance of understanding mechanisms of contaminant transfer
•Purpose of OSU Work
•Provide greater stakeholder confidence in radiological assessment – •Whether part of an ongoing biomonitoring program or •Part of a long-term stewardship assessment.
•Objective is to improve predictions, as well as the reliability in the design and selection of remediation strategies
• The Significance of Transfer Factors in DOE Waste Management
Waste form performance and technology final report, 2011 NAS
Fundamental Process Models (e.g. waste
form durability)
Intermediate level System
Models
PA Models
The PA pyramid showing the hierarchical structure of PA models to evaluate the safety of disposal for radioactive wastes. Uncertainties in assumptions, alternative conceptual models and data are passed upward through the PA levels. Sensitivity analysis can be used to identify specific risk-important factors or processes for which more where more modeling or analysis may be desirable
Containment
Release
Transport
Dose
Unce
rtaint
iesSensitivities
This is the focus of OSU’s work
• For ~ 50 % of animal product no transfer coefficient data available.
• Where data existed <14 % were based on 5 or more studies
• Several nuclides were identified as inadequate for modeling or assessment:
• 36Cl, 237Np, 99Tc, U-isotopes, Th-isotopes, 241Am, 59Ni, 94Nb and 60Co
• IAEA TECDOC 1616: Transfer FactorsElement Bee
fShee
p Meat
Goat Meat
Pork Poultry
Egg Cow Milk
Goat Milk
Ag 1
Am 1 1 1 1 2
Ba 2 1 2 1 15 3
Be 1
Ca 3 2 1 15 12
Cd 8 1 2 8 1
Ce 1 1 6 1
Cl 1
Co 4 2 2 2 4 1
Cr 3 2
Cs 58 41 11 22 13 11 288 28
Fe 4 1 2 7
I 5 1 2 3 4 104 24
La 3
•OSU Seeks to Enhance Credibility
•Waste disposal performance / remediation decisions•Based on limiting dose; •Dose based on biotic transfer assumptions.
•Credibility threats impede public acceptance•Circular / recursive references in performance assessments•Outright lack of data•New challenges to dose /remediation limits
• Allege population-level impacts of radiation on a range of organisms at Chernobyl at dose rates below 0.1 µGy/hr•Numerous publications (~40) with these data•Now publishing on Fukushima
•Moller & Mousseau,
Biology Letters, 2009
•Why this needs to be a big deal to
DOE
Moussea’s publications challenge our understanding of ecosystem responses to radiation
OSU is responding to these publications
Colorado Plateau
Yangjiang China
Guarapari, Brazil
Ramsar, Iran
Kerala Coast, Indai
Repository performance standard post 1,000 years
•Conclusion
•DOE sponsorship through CRESP has leveraged research funds• Scientific results contribute to defensible risk assessments• Substantial student research supported•4 PhD students (1 completed, 1 defending this month, 1
PhD candidate, 1 PhD student)•6 MS students (2 completed, 4 in progress)•2 Honors BS (1 completed)•1 BS research project