Upload
jonas-cox
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Cross Examination
The Importance of Cross-Examination
• Establishes credibility--The dialogue and head to head dynamic create an unique opportunity for the judge to form an opinion about you as a debater and for you to win their trust.
• Establishes clarity• Establishes cracks• Lighten your partner’s load (1AR) and creates
prep time. • You are not Matlock
Body Language
• Stand poised next to your opponent
• Ask question to opponent and then turn and face judge for an answer
• Don’t bury your head in your notes
• Don’t stand quietly taking more notes
• Don’t walk behind your opponent and start talking to their partner
• Don’t play with pens, timers, etc
Prepare ahead of time
• Identify what you are going to win the debate on—what are your major args that prove the plan is a good or bad idea?
• What evidence or arguments of your opponents help prove any of these positions?
• What questions best lead them to reveal this to the judge?
• Answer these questions before the round and you will have good cx
Kinds of questions
• Don’t ask—– Statements.– Open ended, general
questions– Compound or qualified
questions– About dropped
arguments– Rude questions
• Do ask—– Leading questions– Questions that limit– Questions to clarify– Questions that conceal– Questions that repeat– Questions that impose
extra burdens– Questions you know
the answer to
Categories of questions
• Evidence questions– Credibility including author’s quals, date,
source, length, etc– Consistency including how it fits with other ev
in the 1AC or DA– Assumptions including whether the non
underlined parts point out weaknesses or problems or other root causes or forms of solvency
Value Questions
• What is the nature of your value?
• How should your value be viewed? Through a Utilitarian or deontological framework?
• Does your value lead to other benefits?
• Why should be we use your value when other countries or cultures have an entirely different set of values?
• Daisy: What does your evidence from Hays Watson in 1998 say?
• John: It says that the Death Penalty works very well and that there is very little evidence of innocent people being executed in the US….
Fishing
• Daisy: So your Hays Watson evidence that claims that the death penalty isn’t unjust is from 1998, correct?
• John: Yes! • Daisy: Which means it is impossible that it
includes all of the studies done after 1998 that revealed the huge number of innocents that have been executed, correct?
• John: Um….Yes.
Directing
Fishing
• John: So…what does your first advantage say?
• Nate: It says that increasing our health assistance to Africa will help solve a number of diseases including malaria and AIDs and that only our plan will save the lives of millions of innocent children….
Directing
• John: Would you please read to the judge the non underlined part of your second solvency card?
• Nate: It says that “serious infrastructure changes must be made before the AIDs epidemic can be addressed.”
• John: and your plan doesn’t provide any funding for infrastructural improvements like improved hospitals or communcation systems, does it?
• Nate: Well, no.
Fishing
• Eddie: What is Utilitarianism?
• Hays: Well, it is my criterion and it is the most effective way to determine morality because it allows us to view the greatest good for the greatest number of people and really is the most fair system of evaluating the morality of an action.
Directing• Eddie: Utilitarianism is your criterion, correct? • Hays: Yes. • Eddie: And you support Jeremy Bentham’s explanation
of utilitarianism?• Hays: Um…what? • Eddie: Well you quote Bentham describing utilitarianism,
right? • Hays: Oh, Yes. • Eddie: How do you reconcile Bentham’s use of ethical
egoism with your own value of Justice? I mean, if Bentham says each individual should only assess what is most favorable for them personally, how does that achieve Justice for the whole society if everyone does what they want to do?
• Hays: Um……
Maintaining Control
• Choose questions carefully• Politely cut off your opponent• Repeat the same question or
ask another question• Never answer a question they
ask you• Remind them that it is your
cross-ex• Back off and let the judge
take care of it• Remember that the judge
remembers being crossed themselves
Answering Questions
• Direct and reasonable• Be willing to admit
ignorance• Qualify answers first• Take advantage of
open ended questions
• Ask for clarification• Point out irrelevant
questions
Use what you get from cross ex in your speech!