15
Cross Media Analysis Increasing ROI in the media mix L’Oreal case study

Cross Media Analysis · Shift budget to media that are in steeper part of ROI curve Shift part of TV budget towards print and part of ‘Rich media other’ budget towards YouTube

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Cross Media Analysis · Shift budget to media that are in steeper part of ROI curve Shift part of TV budget towards print and part of ‘Rich media other’ budget towards YouTube

1 Google confidential

Cross Media Analysis Increasing ROI in the media mix L’Oreal case study

Page 2: Cross Media Analysis · Shift budget to media that are in steeper part of ROI curve Shift part of TV budget towards print and part of ‘Rich media other’ budget towards YouTube

2 Google confidential 2 Google confidential

Main content

Summary (slides 3)

Set-up and Objectives (slides 5-7)

•  Study objectives

•  Campaign overview

•  Set-Up research

Analysis (slides 9-13)

•  Google Display Network (GDN)

•  Optimizing ROI Curves

•  Optimization of Pre-roll campaigns

•  Frequency capping

Recommendations (slide 15)

Appendix (slides 17-19)

•  Monthly efficiency indices ROS (untargeted) and targeted Pre-roll

•  Explanation regression analysis

Page 3: Cross Media Analysis · Shift budget to media that are in steeper part of ROI curve Shift part of TV budget towards print and part of ‘Rich media other’ budget towards YouTube

3 Google confidential 3 Google confidential

Increase ROI by 32% by shifting 10% TV budget

Current budget allocation New budget allocation

72%

17%

11%

TV

Print

Online

65%

21%

14%

TV

Print

Online

10% of TV budget towards Print/Online

ROI indexed on 100 ROI = 132

Page 4: Cross Media Analysis · Shift budget to media that are in steeper part of ROI curve Shift part of TV budget towards print and part of ‘Rich media other’ budget towards YouTube

4 Google confidential 4 Google confidential

Set-up and objectives

Page 5: Cross Media Analysis · Shift budget to media that are in steeper part of ROI curve Shift part of TV budget towards print and part of ‘Rich media other’ budget towards YouTube

5 Google confidential 5 Google confidential

Study objectives Main Research questions

Research questions for optimizing the media mix

•  How do cost per GRP for TV, Print, Display, Video Ads and Rich Media compare?

•  How to optimize reach and (effective) frequency across media/formats?

•  How does targeting of media and ad formats compare to each other?

•  What is the impact of the different media and ad formats compared to each other?

•  How do cost/effect (ROI) scores compare?

1 Online and off-line have different “languages”: how do we integrate them towards one currency?

2 Online and off-line have different impact and cost: how do we compare and optimize the media mix?

Page 6: Cross Media Analysis · Shift budget to media that are in steeper part of ROI curve Shift part of TV budget towards print and part of ‘Rich media other’ budget towards YouTube

6 Google confidential 6 Google confidential

Research and campaign period (18 campaigns included)

The research and analysis were done over a 5 month period, including 18 campaigns of 14 different beauty products.

February March April May June July

Week 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29

Product 1

Product 2

Product 3

Product 4

Product 5

Product 6

Product 7

Product 8

Product 9

Product 10

Product 11

Product 12

Product 13

Product 14

Page 7: Cross Media Analysis · Shift budget to media that are in steeper part of ROI curve Shift part of TV budget towards print and part of ‘Rich media other’ budget towards YouTube

7 Google confidential 7 Google confidential

Method: Media Efficiency Panel Purchase and media behavior measured from the same individuals (single source)

Print

Folder

Loyalty

Price

TV

Radio

Online

Psychographic

Demo-graphic

Media

Purchase

Personal

Promo

Page 8: Cross Media Analysis · Shift budget to media that are in steeper part of ROI curve Shift part of TV budget towards print and part of ‘Rich media other’ budget towards YouTube

8 Google confidential 8 Google confidential

How to reallocate 10% TV budget and increase ROI by 32%?

Cost

Targeting

Impact

Cost/Effect

Page 9: Cross Media Analysis · Shift budget to media that are in steeper part of ROI curve Shift part of TV budget towards print and part of ‘Rich media other’ budget towards YouTube

9 Google confidential 9 Google confidential

Low cost/GRP on GDN results in opportunity to increase ROI using a small part of the 10% TV budget

The cost/GRP (or CPM) on Google Display Network on average are ~20 times lower than TV, targeting is 9% better and

impact per served impression is about a fifth of TV. This results in ~4 times higher ROI at current spend level. A small

part of the 10% shift in TV budget is allocated to GDN resulting in 4 times more GDN impressions.

Cost 20,11

Targeting 1,09

Impact 0,19

Cost/Effect 4,20

€556

€23

€-

€100

€200

€300

€400

€500

€600

TV Google Display Network

Net Cost/GRP

Source: price of GDN is based on the auction + Cost/GRP TV from Carat Media facts booklet (TV net cost based on 70% average market discount)

Page 10: Cross Media Analysis · Shift budget to media that are in steeper part of ROI curve Shift part of TV budget towards print and part of ‘Rich media other’ budget towards YouTube

10 Google confidential 10 Google confidential

Shift budget to media that are in steeper part of ROI curve Shift part of TV budget towards print and part of ‘Rich media other’ budget towards YouTube

0.00%

0.05%

0.10%

0.15%

0.20%

0.25%

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

TV

Print

Rich Media YouTube

Rich Media Other

→ Average number of contacts

→ In

crea

se in

sal

es

= Average number of contacts

Page 11: Cross Media Analysis · Shift budget to media that are in steeper part of ROI curve Shift part of TV budget towards print and part of ‘Rich media other’ budget towards YouTube

11 Google confidential 11 Google confidential

For many audiences targeted pre-roll is cheaper than TV On TV smaller audiences have a higher GRP price whilst each GRP delivers fewer impressions. YouTube Pre-roll has more stable rate by audience.

Net Cost/GRP Indexed against TV for common TV audiences

1.0

0.1

1.0

0.2

1.0 0.6

1.0

0.3

1.0 1.1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

M20-34 20-34 20-49 V20-49 13+

Net cost/GRP (euro) Population size

Impressions per GRP

Average Net CPM TV (euro)* Average Net CPM l’Oréal

13+ 625 13,753,000 137530 5 5.5

20-34 795 2,996,000 29960 27 5.5

20-49 691 6,832,000 68320 10 5.5

Shoppers 20-49 633 3,732,000 37320 17 5.5

Shoppers + Kid 625 1,896,000 18960 33 5.5

Men 20-34 925 1,502,000 15020 62 5.5

Women 20-49 624 3,398,000 33980 18 5.5

Source: CPM targeted Pre-roll on YouTube in the auction was 5,5 euro + Cost/GRP TV from Carat Media facts booklet (TV net cost based on 70% average market discount)

Page 12: Cross Media Analysis · Shift budget to media that are in steeper part of ROI curve Shift part of TV budget towards print and part of ‘Rich media other’ budget towards YouTube

12 Google confidential 12 Google confidential

HIGH SEASON HIGH SEASON

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Targeted Pre-roll: €14,- CPM

Untargeted Pre-roll (Run of Site): €10,- CPM

Monthly TV costs are STER, SBS, RTL and and average. YouTube Pre-roll costs are based on the YouTube 2012 rate card

Cost/GRP

Pre-Roll is extra efficient in expensive TV months Large Pre-roll opportunity in expensive TV months due to seasonality. Pre-roll does not have this seasonality over months. (calculation Pre-roll versus TV ROI by month in back-up)

Page 13: Cross Media Analysis · Shift budget to media that are in steeper part of ROI curve Shift part of TV budget towards print and part of ‘Rich media other’ budget towards YouTube

13 Google confidential 13 Google confidential

Cap frequency for sites with very frequent visitors Sites/networks with high visiting frequency create too much contacts. For those sites, frequency capping increases ROI strongly.

18.6%

7.3%

9.2%

4.6%

11.6%

4.0%

8.2

4.2

3.0

8.2

3.6

5.1

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

20%

Display Google Display Other Rich Media Google

Rich Media Other Pre-roll Google Pre-roll Other

Reach

Frequency

Page 14: Cross Media Analysis · Shift budget to media that are in steeper part of ROI curve Shift part of TV budget towards print and part of ‘Rich media other’ budget towards YouTube

Google Confidential and Proprietary 14 Google confidential

Recommendations

Page 15: Cross Media Analysis · Shift budget to media that are in steeper part of ROI curve Shift part of TV budget towards print and part of ‘Rich media other’ budget towards YouTube

15 Google confidential 15 Google confidential

Recommendations: shift 10% TV budget

1 Shift part of the TV budget towards Google Display Network. The combination of 20 times lower cost/GRP and

one fifth of the impact compared to TV results in ~4 times higher ROI at current spend level.

2 Shift budget at the end of the TV ROI curve towards media that are still functioning in a steeper part of their

ROI curve (Print and Rich Media).

3 Use variation in TV pricing over months and target audiences as an opportunity to find month versus audience

combinations where Pre-roll is a cheaper solution than TV. (see back up slides for ROI calculation Pre-roll

versus TV by month and audience)

4 Apply frequency capping particularly on sites with very frequent visitors (e.g. social sites). Otherwise

campaigns build an extreme amount of contacts with a relatively small part of the target audience.