28
CROSSHOLE SONIC LOGGING (ASTM 6760 02) USAMA KHALID (2011-MS-CEG-24) ZIA-UR-REHMAN (2011-MS-CEG-18)

Crosshole Sonic Logging

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Crosshole Sonic Logging

CROSSHOLE SONIC LOGGING (ASTM 6760

02)

USAMA KHALID (2011-MS-CEG-24)

ZIA-UR-REHMAN (2011-MS-CEG-18)

Page 2: Crosshole Sonic Logging

ContentsO INTRODUCTION O CROSS-HOLE SONIC LOGGINGO TUBE INSTALLATIONO WAVE REQUIRMENTSO TUBE SPECIFICATIONSO LIMITATIONSO CASE STUDYO References

Page 3: Crosshole Sonic Logging

INTRODUCTION

O Deep foundations integrity testing mostly applies to foundations constructed on-site from concrete or grout, such as drilled shafts, drilled mini piles and pre-cast concrete piles.

O The integrity testing is required for quality control during construction to detect flaws in the pile.

O CSL is used for non-destructive testing (NDT) and involve generating a sonic pulse with one transducer (transmitter) and picking the signal up with another transducer (receiver).

Page 4: Crosshole Sonic Logging

Cross-Hole Sonic Logging

O Cross-Hole Sonic Logging (CSL) is the most common integrity testing method for drilled or cast-in-place foundations.

O A transducer is used to generate a signal that propagates as a sound (compression) wave within the concrete, while another transducer is used to detect the signal.

Page 5: Crosshole Sonic Logging

CSL APPARATUS

Page 6: Crosshole Sonic Logging

TUBE INSTALLATION

O Each transducer is placed into a vertical PVC or steel tube that has been attached to the reinforcement cage and filled with water prior to the concrete placement.

O The water acts as a coupling medium between the transducer and the tube.

O For any reason the condition of the concrete is compromised, the wave speed will be reduced relative to that of the sound concrete value.

Page 7: Crosshole Sonic Logging
Page 8: Crosshole Sonic Logging

O The tubes must have with watertight cap on bottom and removable cap on top.

O Tubes tie with wire to interior of cage at regular intervals of every 3 ft to maintain tube alignment during cage lifting, lowering and concrete placement.

O The generally accepted practice is to place tubes 0.5 ft above shaft bottoms and extend the tubes 2-3 ft above the concrete.

O After completion of test, remove the water from tubes and fill with grout material.

Page 9: Crosshole Sonic Logging

WAVE REQUIRMENTS

O Speed is related to the modulus, E, and bulk density (unit weight, γ, and gravitational acceleration, g).

O The emitter generates a sonic pulse (on the order of 10 pulses per second)

Page 10: Crosshole Sonic Logging

O The source and receiver transducers are lowered to the bottom of their respective tubes and placed such that they are in the same horizontal plane.

O The emitter transducer generates a sonic pulse (on the order of 10 pulses per second), which is detected by the receiver in the adjacent tube.

Page 11: Crosshole Sonic Logging

TUBE SPECIFICATIONS

CSL tests can be performed after minimum of 24 hours for concrete curing.In case of steel pipe, de-bonding between pipe and concrete can occur after 45 days. In case of PVC pipe, de-bonding between pipe and concrete can occur after 10 days.

Page 12: Crosshole Sonic Logging

Number And Spacing Angles Of Tubes

Page 13: Crosshole Sonic Logging
Page 14: Crosshole Sonic Logging
Page 15: Crosshole Sonic Logging

Limitations

O The testing can be performed only on drilled shafts for which access tubes were installed.

O De-bonding between the tubes and concrete is common if testing occurs long after the concrete placement.

O Testing in fresh concrete is also difficult as certain zones may cure at a lower rate, creating difficulties in the interpretation of the threshold time and energy. These zones may therefore be interpreted as poor quality concrete.

Page 16: Crosshole Sonic Logging

CASE STUDY

Page 17: Crosshole Sonic Logging

LYMAN STREET BRIDGE HOLYOKE, USA

INTRODUCTIONO A CSL test was performed on the Lyman Street

Bridge to identify any flaws in the construction. The tests were performed on two shafts, C-1and C-5.

O Each shaft was 42” in diameter. C-1 was 45 m and C-5 was 48 m in depth.

O The 4 steel tubes in each shaft were used for this test.

Page 18: Crosshole Sonic Logging

Site Location Map

Page 19: Crosshole Sonic Logging

Test results

O The tests on shafts C-1 and C-5 showed less than 10% increase in FAT.

O Shaft C-1 showed a defected zone at approximately 13.5 m to 14.5 m below the top of the tubes.

O 20 to 45% FAT was increased from surrounding good concrete with decrease in relative energy.

O More than 10% reduction in velocity from surrounding good concrete indicate POOR concrete.

Page 20: Crosshole Sonic Logging

O In order to confirm the test data, cores were taken within the defected zone. The concrete within zone was segregated concrete.

O The compromised concrete was flushed using high pressure water and the void was then grouted.

O There are no standards or universal criteria to evaluate CSL results.

O The Federal Highway Administration’ USA did develop a CSL criteria guideline called the Concrete Condition Rating Criteria (CCRC)

Page 21: Crosshole Sonic Logging
Page 22: Crosshole Sonic Logging

• One more CSL test was performed on the repaired shaft to check the solidity of the repair. •After the flushing procedure. A video camera was also used to visually inspect the defected zone to ensure the debris had been cleaned out. • After the grouting of the shaft a CSL test was performed. • Than only 15 to 20% average reduction in velocity from the surrounding “good” concrete was observed.

Page 23: Crosshole Sonic Logging

CSL FIELD DATA OF FIRST TEST

Page 24: Crosshole Sonic Logging
Page 25: Crosshole Sonic Logging

CSL TEST DATA AFTER REPAIRING

Page 26: Crosshole Sonic Logging
Page 27: Crosshole Sonic Logging

REFERANCES

O Using Crosshole Sonic Logging (CSL) To Test Drilled-Shaft Foundations by Branagan & Associates, Inc.

O Examination of a New Cross-Hole Sonic Logging System for Integrity Testing of Drilled Shafts by Samuel G. Paikowsky

O Graff, Karl  F.   Wave motion  in   elastic  solids.  [Columbus]:  Ohio   State UP, 1975.  

O Malhotra, V.   M.  Handbook on nondestructive testing  of  concrete   Boca  Raton,  Fla: CRC,  2004. 

Page 28: Crosshole Sonic Logging

THANKS