Upload
alyson-parrish
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CS544: Lecture 2:Syntax and
Compositional Semantics of the
Clause
Jerry R. HobbsUSC/ISI
Marina del Rey, CA
February 24, 2011
Why Syntax? Lexical items (words) tell us the concepts; syntax tells how the concepts fit together to form more complex concepts.
man bites dog
man(m) bite(x,y) dog(d)
Man bites dog.
man(m) & bite(m,d) & dog(d)
Syntax tells us thepredicate-argument
relations
A simple canonical representation of the information conveyed by a sentence
Syntax: the structure of the sentence that reveals pred-arg relationsCompositional semantics: rules for generating logical form from syntax
man
dogbites
man bites dog
dog bites man
Bag of Words
Why Syntax?
The tall man who fell won.
X
tall man fall win
1-D representation
2-D representation
How do we get a 2-D representation out of a 1-D representation?
Syntax.
Why Syntax?
Syntax is the solution to the problem of How do we get predicate-argument relations out of concatenation?
1. Division of words into parts of speech, and finer categories (features)2. Placement of predicates and arguments in adjacent positions in the string3. Constraints on interpretation of adjacency in terms of parts of speech and finer-grained features
Logical Form
man bites dog
x y
bite(x,y)
But also, man(x) and dog(y)
man bites dog hard
The biting is hard, so we need a variable to attach to (or represent) the biting.
E.g., label the proposition: e: bite(x,y)
Or to stay in first-order logic: bite’(e,x,y)Then: hard(e)
Parts of Speech Noun (NN, NNS): singular and plural; “The _____ is ...” “The ______ are …”
Verb (VB, VBP, VBZ, VBD, VBN, VBG): go, go, goes, went, gone, going; “_____-ing”
Adjective (JJ, JJR, JJS): good, better, best; “The ____ thing is ...” “The thing is _____” red glass vs. wine glass but not forms of verbs: broken, running
Adverb (RB, RBR, RBS): rapidly, faster, fastest; often “____-ly” “It does it ______” Plus some special words: very, not, ...
OPEN CLASS
TreeBank tags
Parts of Speech
Pronoun (PP): I, you, he, she, it, we, they, ...
Predeterminers (PDT): all the ..., such a ...
Determiner and Quantifiers (DT): a, the, some, all, ...
Numbers (CD or NUM): one, twenty, 58, ...
Auxiliaries (AUX): is, have, did, ...
Modals (MD): can, must, should, ...
Preposition, subordinate conjunction (IN): of, in, to, during, if, before, ...
Particles (RT): out, up, ...
Coordinating conjunction (CC): and, or, but, so
CLOSED CLASS
Parts of Speech
The (DT) nation’s (NN$) biggest (JJS) public (JJ) pension (NN) fund (NN) , which (WP) has (VBP) lost (VBN) more (JJ) than (IN) a (DT) quarter (NN) of (IN) its (PR$) value (NN) in (IN) the (DT) last (JJ) seven (CD) months (NNS), is (VBP) planning (VBG) to (TO) rally (VB) big (JJ) investors (NNS) nationwide (JJ).
In (IN) May (NNP) 2006 (CD) a (DT) unit (NN) of (IN) American (JJ) soldiers (NNS) in (IN) Afghanistan’s (NNP$) Uruzgan (NNP) Valley (NNP) were (VBD) engulfed (VBN) in (IN) a (DT) ferocious (JJ) fire (NN) fight (NN) with (IN) the (DT) Taliban (NNP).
Winter (NN) came (VBD) and (CC) the (DT) city (NN) turned (VBD) monochrome (JJ) – black (JJ) trees (NNS) against (IN) gray (JJ) sky (NN) above (IN) white (JJ) earth (NN) .
The (DT) practice (NN) of (IN) parsing (VBG) can (MD) be (VB) considered (VBN) as (IN) a (DT) straightforward (JJ) implementation (NN) of (IN) the (DT) idea (NN) of (IN) chunking (VBG).
See Tables 4.5 and 4.6 in Manning & Schuetze.
Basic Clause Structure
S --> NP VP Pat [likes Chris]
VP --> V NP likes Chris
Subject
Object / Complement
Abstract these rules:
Add argument on left.
Add argument on right. PP --> P NP (in California)
S
NP VP
NPV
Pat likes Chris
(S1 (S (NP (NNP Pat) (VP (VPZ likes) (NP (NNP Chris)))) (. .))
Head
y2=y3
NPV
Pat(x1) like(x2,y2) Chris(y3)
x1=x2
NP
Subjects
Subjects must agree with the main verb in number and have the right case.
Only relevant to pronouns: I sleep. * Me sleep.
Singular or plural
We could expand the grammar:
S --> NPSing VPSing S --> NPPlur VPPlur
Note: This makes every past tense verb ambiguous
OR ...
Unification Grammar Associate a set of features with each symbol in the grammar and condition rules on the values of these features.
S[nbr=x] --> NP[nbr=x] VP[nbr=x]
These must unify, i.e., be equal already or be able to be made equal
“goes”: V[nbr=Sing]
“went”: V[nbr=x]
A variable that can take on either value, Sing or Plur
“man”: N[nbr=Sing]
“men”: N[nbr=Plur]
Information can bepassed up to parent
Pollard and Sag, Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 1994
The Structure of the VP
There are lots of possible complements: 1st Compl 2nd Compl
He arrived. --- --- Intransitive
He forgot his friend’s name. NP --- Transitive
She gave John the book. NP NP Ditransitive
They rely on the U.S. PP[p=on] --- Note that “on” is required: *“They relied.”
He gave up. RP[p=up] --- Note that “give up” =/= “give” + “up”
More than just VP --> V NP
The Structure of the VP
There are lots of possible complements: 1st Compl 2nd Compl
Figure out the solution / Figure it out. RP[p=out] NP “Figure out” =/= “Figure” + “out” Particle can be before or after complement; separable
She put the book on the table. NP PP Prepositional phrases can be complements
He shouted that he was right. (that) S --- Sentential complement
She told me that she was right. NP (that) S Sentential complement with an indirect object
More than just VP --> V NP
The Structure of the VP
There are lots of possible complements: 1st Compl 2nd Compl
He tries to amuse us. VP[vform=inf] --- Infinitive complement
He wants us to leave. NP[case=acc] VP[vform=inf] --- One complement: the situation is wanted (small clause)
He made us leave. NP[case=acc] VP[vform=base] --- One complement: the situation is caused/made. Let us know if you need it. PP[p=if] --- Subcategorizing for a subordinate clause
They point out that she was right. RP[p=out] (that) S
We consider parsing as chunking. NP[case=acc] PP[p=as]
More than just VP --> V NP
Different verbs subcategorize for different complements.
Subcategorization
He arrived. VP --> V[comp1=null] “arrive”: V[comp1=null]She forgot his name. VP --> V[comp1=n] NP “forget”: V[comp1=n]She gave John the book. VP --> V[comp1=n,comp2=n] NP NP “give”: V[comp1=n,comp2=n]They rely on the U.S. VP --> V[comp1=p.x] PP[p=x] “rely”: V[comp1=p.on]He gave up. VP --> V[comp1=rp.x] RP[rp=x] “give”: V[comp1=rp.up]Figure out the solution / Figure it out. VP --> V[comp1=rp.x,comp2=n] RP[rp=x] NP “figure”: V[comp1=rp.out,comp2=n]He shouted that he was right. VP --> V[comp1=s] (“that”) S “shout”: V[comp1=s]He tries to amuse us. VP --> V[comp1=inf] VP[vform=inf] “try”: V[comp1=inf]
Generalizing Subcategorization
He arrived. “arrive”: Syn[vbd,n,-,-]She forgets his name. “forget”: Syn[vbz,n.sing,n,-]She gave John the book. “give”: Syn[vbd,n,n,n]They rely on the U.S. “rely”: Syn[vbp,n.plur,p.on,-]He gave up. “give”: Syn[vbd,n,rp.up,-]Figure out the solution / Figure it out. “figure”: Syn[vb,n,rp.out,n]He shouted that he was right. “shout”: Syn[vbd,n,thats] “that”: Syn[thats,-,v,-]He tends to amuse us. “tend”: Syn[vbz,n,inf] “to”: Syn[inf,-,vb,-]
S --> NP VP: Syn[f,-,-,-] --> Syn[a,-,-,-] Syn[f,a,-,-]VP --> V NP: Syn[f,a,c,-] --> Syn[f,a,b,c] Syn[b,-,-,-]
Syn[f,a,b,c]
category of head category and features of subject
cat and featuresof 1st compl
cat and features of 2nd compl
root or stem
Generalizing Subcategorization:
Example S --> NP VP:1. Syn[f,-,-,-] --> Syn[a,-,-,-] Syn[f,a,-,-]VP --> V NP:2. Syn[f,a,c,-] --> Syn[f,a,b,c] Syn[b,-,-,-]
Syn[vbd,-,-,-]
Syn[n,-,-,-]Syn[vbd,n,-,-]
Syn[vbd,n,thats,-]
Syn[vbd,n,n,thats]Syn[n,-,-,-]
Syn[thats,-,v,-]
Syn[vbz,n,-,-]Syn[n,-,-,-]
Syn[vbz,-,-,-]
Syn[thats,-,-,-]
John told Mary that he works
1
1
2
2
2
The feature v is a superfeatureof vbz and vbd, and so it
unifies with them.
Logical Form for the VP
He arrived. arrive(x) or arrive’(e,x)He forgot his friend’s name. forget(x,y)She gave John the book. give(x,y,z)They rely on the U.S. rely(x,y)He gave up. give-up(x) The predicate “give-up” is not the same as “give”
Figure out the solution / Figure it out. figure-out(x,y)She put the book on the table. put(x,y,e1) & on’(e1,y,z) The second complement describes a condition of the first complement. Can’t just have the table as the arg; in the cupboard, above the TV, ...
He shouted that he was right. shout(x,e1) & right’(e1,x)She told me that she was right. tell(x,y,e1) & right’(e1,x)
Logical Form for the VP
He tries to amuse us. try(x,e1) & amuse’(e1,x,y) Subject control: The subject of the sentence is also the subject of the complement clause.
He wants us to leave. want(x,e1) & leave’(e1,y)He made us leave. make(x,e1) & leave’(e1,y)They point out that she was right. point-out(x,e1) & right’(e1,y)
He asked us to leave. NP VP[vform=inf]He asked us to leave. ask(x,y,e1) & leave’(e1,y) Two complements because the recipient of the asking needs to be an argument of “ask” He wants the problem to go away. He made the problem go away. * He asked the problem to go away. Object control: The first complement is the subject of the second complement. Also in “She put the book on the table.”
Logical Form for Tense
Tense is a property of the eventuality of the verb:
He arrives. ==> arrive’(e,x) & Present(e) He saw her. ==> see’(e,x,y) & Past(e) He is arriving. ==> arrive’(e1,x) & Progressive’(e2,e1) & Present(e2)
Unwinds a point-like eventinto a durational event.
Other Words Also Subcategorize
Prepositions (and subordinate conjunctions):
John went to the store; a trip to the store “to”: Syn[in,n/v,n,-] OR IN[subj=np/s, comp1=np]
If he arrives, tell me. “if”: Syn[in,v,v,-] OR IN[subj=s, comp1=s] (but “if anything,…”)
Before he arrived, he was drunk. the party before I arrived.Before his arrival, he was drunk. the party before graduation “before”: Syn[in,n/v,n/v,-] OR IN[subj=np/s, comp1=np/s]
Adjectives:
He is responsible for the problem. “responsible”: Syn[jj,n,in.for,-] OR JJ[subj=np,comp1=in.for]
Heads of phrases subcategorize for the subjects and complements they can take.
Predicate Complements
What does “be” (“am”, “is”, “are”, “was”, “were”, “been”, “being”) subcategorize for?What can follow a form of the verb “be”?
NP: Anne Stausboll is a 10-year fund veteran.Adjective Phrase: CalPERS is ready to impement it.PP: The algorithm is for making chunks.
Passive: The lights were reflected against the clouds.Progressive: The wind was blowing off the lake.
Not really a predicate complementbut it can appear
anywhere an adjectivephrase can appear
More restricted thanadjective phrases
Define pred as superfeature of n, jj, in, vbn, vbg
“be”: Syn[vb.be, n, pred, -] OR VB[subj=np,compl1=pred]
Predicate Complements:Logical Form
NP: Pat is boss. Pat(x) & be(x,y) & boss(y) OR Pat(x) & boss(x) (plus tense) (Sometimes “be” means something other than identity.)
For the others, “be” is just a carrier of tense:Adjective Phrase: CalPERS is ready to implement it. CalPERS(x) & Present(e0) & ready’(e0,x,e1) & implement’(e1,x,y) (Note subject control)
PP: The algorithm is for making chunks. algorithm(x) & Present(e0) & for’(e0,x,e) & make’(e,z,y) & chunk(y)
Passive: The light was reflected. light(x) & Past(e) & reflect’(e,y,x) Note that subject appears as second argument.
Progressive: The wind was blowing.
Other Verbs Take Predicate Complements
He ranks high in my book.
I became tired / sick / a professor / *at USC
We dismissed him as odd.
We used the documents as data.
The complements describe the subject. In “John likes Mary”,
“Mary” doesn’t describe the subject
“as” subcategorizes for predicate complements
Some verbs take only somekinds of predicate complements
When is a phrase a predicate complement? When it describes its subject (incl the subject of “as”).
Logical form: eventuality as second argument + subject control become(x,e) & sick’(e,x)
AdjunctsAdverbs and adverbial phrases can be adjuncts:
Adverb: Sometimes John ran slowly here.Adverbial phrase: I can see it better than you can.
Anything that can be a predicate complement can be an adjunct too.
NP: Investors put $67 billion into mutual funds, a 186% increase over 2003.Adjective phrase: Incapable of driving, he called a taxi.PP: I watched the whales with binoculars. Before midnight, he left the party. Before he left the party, he said goodbye.Passive: Snapped in two by the wind, the tree had to be replaced.-ing: Whistling as he walked, he seemed very happy.
Logical form: eventuality of the main clause is the subject argument: John(x) & run’(e,x) & sometimes(e) & slow(e) & here(e,u)
Often an initial adverbial modifies the subject, rather than the whole clause.
Adjunct Placement
Where can adjuncts go? Roughly, anywhere but inside NPs and PPs.
Suddenly, the tall man left.* The suddenly tall man left.* The tall suddenly man left. The tall man suddenly left. The tall man left suddenly.
Syn[f1,a,b,c] --> Syn[f1,a,b,c] Syn[f2,f1,-,-]Syn[f1,a,b,c] --> Syn[f2,f1,-,-] Syn[f1,a,b,c]
S --> (Adjunct) NP (Adjunct) VPVP --> V (Adjunct) NP (Adjunct)
Adjunct Placement ExampleS --> NP VP:1. Syn[f,-,-,-] --> Syn[a,-,-,-] Syn[f,a,-,-]VP --> V NP:2. Syn[f,a,c,-] --> Syn[f,a,b,c] Syn[b,-,-,-]Adjunct on left:3. Syn[f1,a,b,c] --> Syn[f2,f1,-,-] Syn[f1,a,b,c]
Syn[vbz,-,-,-]
Syn[vbz,n,-,-]
Syn[vbz,-,-,-]
Syn[vbz,-,-,-]
Syn[vbz,n,-,-]
Syn[n,-,-,-]
Syn[n,-,-,-]
Syn[in,v,v,-]
Syn[in,v,-,-]
If he heworks sleeps
3
2
1
1
Adjunct or Complement?
Adjuncts add detail without changing the meaning:
John ran slowly.
Or they shade the meaning:
John almost ran. Mary did not run.
Adjunct or complement?
John flew from Los Angeles to Tokyo.
They can be deleted without changing the meaning. Generally PPs like this can be treated as adjuncts, but it will generally be easier to get the right final representation treating them as complements.
If obligatory, it’s a complement:
John relies on Mary. =/=> * John relies.
Adverbs with Complements
“too small to generate heat”:
“too”: Syn[rb, jj, vp.inf] ==> too(e1, e2) & small’(e1,x) & generate’(e2,x,y) & heat(y)
“enough time to thaw”:
“enough”: Syn[rb, nn, vp.inf] ==> enough(x,e) & time(x) & thaw’(e,y)
Three Important Adjunct Constructions
Measure NPs:
John ran three miles. ==> run’(e,x) & measure(e,3 miles) Global funds rose 18.5% last year.
Time NPs:
I’ll meet you Saturday. ==> meet’(e,x,y) & atTime(e,z) & Sat(z)
Manner NPs:
Please do it the way I told you to. ==> way(e2,e1) & do’(e1,x,y) & tell’(e2,z,y,e3) …
Three More Important Adjunct Constructions
Purpose infinitives (not the same as infinitive complement):
I flew to Tokyo to give a talk. (= in order to give a talk) ==> fly’(e1,x) & in-order-to(e1,e2) & give’(e2,x,y,z) & talk(y) vs. I want to leave =/= I want in order to leave.
Quotations:
“Let’s, you know, leave now,” said John.
Small clauses as adjuncts:
“The snowstorms rolled in, the city lights reflected against the clouds.” “I would forget where I was, my thoughts a numbed reflection of the silence.”
Ss and VPs as NPs
Weak nominalizations: ways of treating Ss and VPs as NPs.
Driving in LA traffic isn’t easy. Any algorithm for making chunks will produce something. That you left early surprised me. To leave early would be rude. For you to leave early would be rude.
Plus a few others.
The eventuality appears in the logical form: drive’(e1,x) & not(e2) & easy’(e2,e1)
Auxiliaries
I could have been being admired all this time.
modal aux for perfect tense aux for progressive aux for passive
We can treat auxiliaries as verbs that subcategorize for special VP complements:
“could”: Syn[md,n,vb,-] OR MD[compl1=vb] I could go. Other modals: can, will, would, shall, should, may, might ==> could(x,e) & go’(e,x)Perfect tense: “have”: Syn[vb/vbp,n,vbn,-] OR VB[compl1=vbn] I have gone. ==> Perfect(e) & go’(e,x)
We’ve seen Passive and Progressive already.
“do” for emphasis or negation or “do so”: “to” for infinitives: “do”: Syn[vb/vbp,n,vb,-] “to”: Syn[inf,n,vb,-]
Relevant to some reference time