CSEE Letter

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/2/2019 CSEE Letter

    1/3

    19 March 2012The Honourable Keith AshfieldMinister of Fisheries and Oceans200 Kent StreetOttawa, OntarioK1A 0E6

    Dear Minister Ashfield,

    I am writing in my capacity as President of the Canadian Society For Ecologyand Evolution (CSEE). The 1000-strong membership of the non-partisan CSEEincludes ecologists and evolutionary biologists from across Canada.

    The concerns expressed here are made on behalf of the CSEE. They areinformed, in part, by the responsibilities I exercised as Chair of the Committee onthe Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC; 2006-2010) and asChair of the 2012 Royal Society of CanadaExpert Panel Report entitledSustaining Canadas Marine Biodiversity: Responding to the Challenges Posedby Climate Change, Fisheries, and Aquaculture.

    The CSEE has very grave concerns regarding the Government of Canadasproposed changes to Section 35(1) of the Fisheries Act. Specifically:

    1. The CSEE is concerned that the proposed changes were not informed bya full and appropriate consideration of the best available science;

    2. The CSEE is concerned that the proposed changes will prevent Canadafrom fulfilling its national and international commitments to sustainbiodiversity; and

    3. The CSEE is concerned that the proposed changes will prevent Canadafrom fulfilling its legislated responsibilities under the Species at Risk Act.

    Each of these concerns is elaborated upon briefly below.

    Firstly, there is no evidence to suggest that the proposed revision to the FisheriesActwas based on an appropriate level of consultation with, and advice received

  • 8/2/2019 CSEE Letter

    2/3

    2

    from, DFOs Science Sector. According to the DFO website, science is the basisfor sound decision making. DFO Science Sector provides information on theconsequences of management and policy options, and the likelihood of achievingpolicy objectives under alternative management strategies and tactics.

    DFOs website further notes that the incorporation of science in decision makingis provided through a rigorous peer review process built on the Government ofCanadas Framework for Science and Technology Advice: Principles andGuidelines for the Effective Use of Science and Technology Advice inGovernment Decision Makingwhich states:

    Science advice has an important role to play by contributing togovernment decisions that serve Canadas strategic interests andconcerns in areas such as public health and safety, food safety,environmental protection, sustainable development, innovation, andnational security.

    Based on the assumption that your decision was not made in violation ofdepartmental or government policy, the proposed revisions to Section 35(1) ofthe Fisheries Actmust have been informed by advice received by DFOs ScienceSector. In the interests of transparency and accountability, and in the interests ofCanadian society, we respectfully request that the science advice received in thisregard be made publicly available without delay.

    Secondly, the proposed changes to the Fisheries Actwill be considered anabrogation of Canadas global ocean and freshwater stewardship responsibilities.The CSEE notes the conclusion by the Royal Society of CanadasExpert Panelthat Canada has fallen well short of the progress made by most developednations in fulfilling national and international commitments to sustain marinebiodiversity and that many targets and obligations to conserve and tosustainably use biodiversity have not been met by Canada.

    The proposed changes to the Fisheries Actwill severely impair Canadas abilityto protect species and their habitat and will, thus, further reduce the likelihoodthat Canada will fulfil its national and international biodiversity commitments.

    Thirdly, it is well-established in the scientific literature, and articulated inCanadian government policy and statute, that the protection of species habitatconstitutes the most effective means of ensuring that species do not becomeextinct. The Species at Risk Act(SARA), for example, acknowledges that thehabitat of species at risk is key to their conservation.

    The proposed elimination of existing habitat protection provisions in the FisheriesActwill severely impair Canadas ability to fulfil its legislated obligations underSARA to prevent the extinction of aquatic wildlife species.

  • 8/2/2019 CSEE Letter

    3/3

    3

    In the interests of all sectors of Canadian society, we request that you withdrawthe proposed revisions and maintain the current wording of Section 35(1) of theFisheries Act.

    Yours sincerely,

    Jeffrey A. HutchingsPresident, Canadian Society For Ecology and EvolutionProfessor, Department of Biology, Dalhousie University