Upload
danimiquee
View
218
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/11/2019 Cunningham e Henderson 1965.pdf
1/7
E. P. Cunningham and C. R. HendersonTraits in Beef Cattle
Estimation of Genetic and Phenotypic Parameters of Weaning
1965, 24:182-187.J ANIM SCI
http://www.journalofanimalscience.org/content/24/1/182services, is located on the World Wide Web at:
The online version of this article, along with updated information and
www.asas.org
by guest on July 14, 2014www.journalofanimalscience.orgDownloaded from by guest on July 14, 2014www.journalofanimalscience.orgDownloaded from
http://http//www.journalofanimalscience.org/content/24/1/182http://http//www.journalofanimalscience.org/content/24/1/182http://www.asas.org/http://www.journalofanimalscience.org/http://www.journalofanimalscience.org/http://www.journalofanimalscience.org/http://www.journalofanimalscience.org/http://www.journalofanimalscience.org/http://www.journalofanimalscience.org/http://www.journalofanimalscience.org/http://www.asas.org/http://http//www.journalofanimalscience.org/content/24/1/1828/11/2019 Cunningham e Henderson 1965.pdf
2/7
E S T I M A T I O N O F G E N E T I C A N D P H E N O T Y P I C P A R A M E T E R S
O F W E A N I N G T R A I T S I N B E E F C A T T L E 1
E P
C U N N I N G H A I V s ~ A N D C R H E N D E R S O N
C o r n el l U n i v e r si ty I t h a c a N e w Y o r k
R E W E A N I N G p e r fo r m a n c e is re c og n iz e d
a s o n e o f t h e m o s t i m p o r t a n t f a c t o r s i n
d e t e r m i n i n g t h e e c o n o m i c r e t u r n s f r o m b e e f
c a t t le , a n d i n g e n e t ic im p r o v e m e n t o f t h e
b e e f c a t t l e p o p u l a t i o n f o r o v e r al l p r o d u c t i v i t y .
G en e t i c r e s p o n s e t o s e l ec t i o n i n s u ch a p o p u l a -
t i o n d ep en d s o n t h e i n t en s i t y o f s e l ec t i o n , t h e
g e n e t i c v a r i a b i l i t y o f t h e t r a i t s c o n c e r n e d ,
t h e r e l a t i o n a m o n g t h e m , a n d t h e a c c u r a c y
w i t h w h i c h w e c a n i d e n t i f y t h e i n d i v i d u a l s
i n t h e p o p u l a t i o n w i t h t h e i r g e n o t y p e s . E f f o r t s
to m a x i m i z e t h i s r e s p o n se f o r p r e w e a n i n g p e r -
f o r m a n c e r e q u i r e a k n o w l e d g e o f t h e g e n e t i c
a n d p h e n o t y p i c p a r a m e t e r s o f t h e c o m p o n e n t s
o f t h i s t r a i t . A n u m b er o f e s t i m a t e s o f t h e s e
p a r a m e t e r s h a v e b e e n d e r i v e d f r o m r e c o r d s i n
e x p e r i m e n t s t a t i o n h e r d s . T h e p r e s e n t p a p e r
r e p o r t s o n t h e e s t i m a t i o n o f e n v i r o n m e n t a l
e f fec t s, v a r i an ce co m p o n en t s , h e r i t ab i l it i e s an d
co r r e l a t i o n s f o r w ean i n g t r a i t s i n a l a r g e p o p u -
l a t i o n o f co m m er c i a l h e r d s .
M a t e r i a l s a n d M e t h o d s
T h e d a t a a v a i l a b l e f o r t h i s s t u d y w e r e c o l -
l e c t e d o n 8 3 f a r m s i n N e w Y o r k o v e r t h e
y ea r s 1 9 4 6 t o 1 9 6 0 , an d co m p r i s ed 7 ,9 7 1 r e -
c o r d s o f th e A n g u s , H e r e f o r d a n d S h o r t h o r n
b r e e d s . T h e b r e e d i n g p a t t e r n o f t h e s e h e r d s
in N 'ew York i s l a rge ly s easonal , i . e . , t he cows
c a Iv ~ i n M a r c h , A p r i l a n d M a y a n d t h e c a l v es
a r e w e a n e d i n O c t o b e r , N o v e m b e r a n d D e -
c e m b e r . T h e y a r e u s u a l l y s o l d a t w e a n i n g
as f e ed e r c a l v e s. E ac h r eco r d co n s i s t ed o f a
w e i g h t a n d t y p e s c o r e o n a w e a n l i n g c a l f w i th
i n f o r m a t i o n o n t h e i d en t i t y o f t h e ca l f , s i r e ,
d a m a n d h e r d , a n d o n t h e b r e e d , s e x, y e a r
a n d d a t e o f b i r t h , d a t e o f w e i g h in g a n d c r e e p -
f eed s t a t u s o f t h e ca l f . B ecau s e o f d e f i c i en c i e s
o f V a ri o u s k i n d s i n t h e d a t a an d t h e r e s t r i c -
t i o n s i m p o s ed f o r t h e p u r p o s e s o f t h e an a l y s i s ,
3 , 1 3 3 , o r 3 9 o f t h e s e r e co r d s w e r e d i s ca r d ed .
T h i s r e d u c t i o n e l i m i n a t e d d a t a f o r t h e f i r s t
x Based in p art on a thesis subm itted by the senior autho r
to the Graduate School Cornell Univ ersity in partial fulfillment
of the requirements for the Ph.D. degree.
Present address: Animal Breeding and Genetics Depart ment
The Agricultural Inst itute Castleknock Co. Dublin Ireland.
3 y e a r s o f t h e p r o g r a m f ro m t h e S h o r t h o r n
b r e e d a n d f r o m 2 8 h e r d s , m o s t o f w h i c h h a d
v e r y s m a l l n u m b e r s o f c o w s .
T r a i t s S t u d i e d . P r e w e a n i n g p e r f o r m a n c e
m a y b e e v a l u a t e d b y m e a n s o f r e c o r d s o n
w e i g h t a t w e a n i n g ( W W ) , a v e r a g e d a il y ga i n
f r o m b i r t h t o w e a n i n g ( A D G ) a n d , t o a l e ss e r
e x t e n t , b y t h e t y p e s c o r e o r g r a d e o f t h e c a l f
a t w e a n i ng ( T S ) . A D G is a f u n c t io n o f W W ,
d a y s o f a g e ( D A ) a n d b i r th w e i g ht ( B W ) .
I f g r o w t h i s l i n e a r w i t h a g e o f c a lf , th e n A D G
W W - B W
m a y b e e x p r e s s e d a s D A . I n t h e p r e -
s e n t d a t a b i r t h w e i g h t w a s n o t a v a i l a b l e , a n d
w a s t a k e n a s a c o n s t a n t f o r e a c h b r e e d ( 6 0 lb .
f o r A n g u s a n d 7 0 l b . f o r H e r e f o r d ) . I n t h is
c a se W W s t a n d a rd i z e d f o r a g e o f c a l f m a y b e
co n s i d e r ed t h e s am e t r a i t a s A D G , d i f f e r i n g
f r o m i t o n l y b ecau s e o f a s ca l in g f ac t o r . T h i s
i s co n f i r m ed b y t h e v a l u e s o f 0 . 9 8 an d 0 . 9 3
o b t a i n e d f o r t h e g e n e t i c c o r r e l a t i o n o f A D G
a n d W W b y K o c h a n d C la r k ( 1 9 5 5 a ) a n d
L e h m a n n et al . ( 1 9 6 1 ) , a l t h o u g h i n b o t h o f
t h e s e s t u d i e s a c t u a l b i r t h w e i g h t s w e r e u s e d .
T h e a s s u m p t i o n o f l i n e a r i t y o f g r o w t h w i t h
a g e w a s e x a m i n e d b y d i v i d i n g t h e a g e o f c a l f
i n t o 1 0 - d a y i n t e r v a l s f r o m 1 2 0 t o 2 5 0 d a y s
a n d p l o t t i n g t h e u n a d j u s t e d m e a n s o f t h e
r e c o r d s f o r e a c h i n t e r v a l . T h i s w a s d o n e
s e p a r a t e l y f o r e a c h b r e e d , a n d t h e r e s p o n s e
a p p e a r e d t o b e c l o s e l y l in e a r . I n a d d i t i o n ,
t e s t s o f t h e s i g n i f i c an ce o f l i n ea r r eg r e s s i o n
w e r e c o m p u t e d , u s in g u n a d j u s t e d w e a n i n g
w e i g h t s a n d s i n g le - d a y a g e in t e r v a l s f r o m
1 2 0 t o 2 5 0 d a y s . T h e s e a r e p r e s e n t e d i n t a b l e
1 . T h e v a l u e s o f t h e r eg r e s s i o n co e f f ic i en t w e r e
1 .6 7 f o r t h e A n g u s an d 1 .4 9 f o r t h e H e r e f o r d s .
A l l W W r e c o r d s w e r e c o n v e r t e d t o A D G
f ig u r e s, a n d t h e t r a i ts A D G a n d T S w e r e
t h e n t a k e n a s a m e a s u r e o f p r e w e a n i n g p r e -
f o r m a n c e . T S w a s b a s e d o n t h e s t a n d a r d
f e e d e r c a l f g r a d e s , w i t h e a c h g r a d e b e i n g
d i v i d e d i n t o p l u s , a v e r a g e a n d m i n u s . N u -
m e r i c a l v a l u e s w e r e t h e n a s s i g n e d t o t h e
v a r i o u s g r a d e s, r a n g i n g f r o m 4 ( C o m m o n ) t o
1 7 ( F a n c y + ) . A l m o s t a ll o f t h e c a l v e s i n
t h e p r o g r a m w e r e g r a d e d b y o n e m a n .
182
by guest on July 14, 2014www.journalofanimalscience.orgDownloaded from
http://www.journalofanimalscience.org/http://www.journalofanimalscience.org/http://www.journalofanimalscience.org/8/11/2019 Cunningham e Henderson 1965.pdf
3/7
E S T I M A T I N G W E A N I N G T R A I T S I N C A T T L E i 3 3
T A B L E 1 . A N A L Y S I S O F V A R I A N C E ] ?O R L I N E A R R E G R E S S I O N O F
W E A N I N G W E I G H T O N D A Y S O F A G E ~
A n g u s H e r e f o r d
S o u r c e d . f . M S f d . f . M S f
L i n e a r r e g r e s s i o n 1 7 7 3 6 2 7 6 . 0 1 8 6 1 . 8 * * 1 2 9 8 2 5 7 2 . 0 4 8 0 . 5 * *
D e v i a t i o n s f r o m
l i n e a r r e g r e s s i o n 1 2 8 4 1 5 5 . 3 1 . 3 1 2 4 6 2 0 7 . 3 1 . 2
E r r o r 3 2 7 9 3 1 6 2 . 8 9 1 7 32 5 1 1 6 . 2 . .
a I nc ludes 427 r ecords w hich were d i s carded in the l a t e r ana lys es fo r l ack o f age-of -dam in fo rmat ion .
~ p ~ . 0 1 .
G e n e r a l i n f o r m a t i o n r e l a t i n g t o t h e d a t a i s
s u m m ar i zed i n t ab l e 2 .
Method o f Analys i s
E a c h A D G a n d T S
r eco r d w as c l a ss i fi ed b y b r eed , s ex , ag e o f d am ,
y e a r , s i re , h e r d , c r e e p - f e e d s t a t u s a n d m o n t h
o f b i r t h . S e p a r a t e a n a l y s e s w e r e c a r r i e d o u t
f o r t h e t w o b r e e d s . M e a n v a l u e s f o r b o t h
t r a i t s v a r i e d l i tt l e w i t h m o n t h o f b i r t h , a n d
th i s c l as s i f i ca t ion was ignored . S i r es were
n e s t e d w i t h i n h e r d s a n d h e r d s w i t h i n c r e e p -
f eed i n g c l a s s e s . C l a s s i f i c a t i o n b y d am s w as
n o t c o n s i d e r e d , a n d t h e d a m c o n t r i b u t i o n t o
v a r i a t i o n w a s t a k e n t o b e a r a n d o m v a r i a b l e .
T h e f o l l o w i n g m o d e l w a s c o n s t r u c t e d f r o m
the f ive c l as s i f i ca t ions , s ex , age of dam, year ,
s i r e , h e r d , an d t h e i r i n t e r ac t i o n s , f o r p u r p o s e s
o f l o ca t i n g an d t e s t i n g t h e p r i n c i p a l s o u r ce s
o f v a r i a t i o n :
Xijk lm q=/~ + SI- -~Aj+Yk-~- SAIj-~-S Y l k + P l m
- ~ - e i j k l m q
w h e r e
X ijk lm q i s t h e s i n g l e o b s e r v ed A D G o r T S
i s t h e p o p u l a t i o n m e a n
Si i s the e f f ec t o f the
i th
sex
A j i s t h e e f f ec t o f t h e j t h ag e o f d am
Yk i s the e f f ec t o f the k t h y e a r
P lm i s the e f f ec t o f the
l m t h
s i r e - h e r d
c las s
eijklmq iS a r an do m e rro r specif ic to this
o b s e r v a t i o n .
T h e r e w e r e t h r ee s ex es : b u l l , h e i f e r an d s t e e r .
A g e o f d am w as g r o u p ed i n t o s ev en c l a s s e s
as fo l lows : 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 to 10 and over 10
y e a r s o f a g e . T h e s e g r o u p i n g s w e r e s e t u p
f r o m t h e o b s e r v e d d i s t r i b u t i o n o f t h e m e a n
T A B L E 2 . M E A N S A N D S I R E A N D H E R D
N U M B E R S A N D N U M B E R O F C A L V E S
F O R E A C H B R E E D
N 0 . N o . N o . M e a n M e a n M e a n a g e
of o f o f AD G, type o f ca l f
B reed ca lves herds s i r es l b . /d ay s corea days
Angus 3190 39 121 1 . 829 11 . 626 195 . 86
Hereford 1648 16 55 1 . 812 11 . 534 199 . 37
a Faney--[ -~-17, F an cy m l6 , Fancy--~---15, etc.
A D G f o r d i f f e r e n t a g e s o f t h e d a m f r o m 2
t o 2 0 y ea r s .
V a r i o u s a p p r o x i m a t e t e s t s o f t w o - a n d
t h r e e - w a y i n t e r a c t i o n s h a v e b e e n p r o p o s e d
( S n ed eco r an d C o x , 1 9 3 5 ; S w i g e r , 1 9 6 1 ) . A s
a p r e l i m i n a r y s t e p , t h e t w o - a n d t h r e e - w a y
i n t e r a c t i o n s a m o n g t h e s e x , a g e o f d a m a n d
y e a r c l a s s e s w e r e p l o t t e d a n d e x a m i n e d . T h e y
i n d i ca t e d n o l a r g e i n t e r ac t i o n e f f ec t s . A n a n -
a l y s i s o f v a r i a n c e w a s t h e n c o m p u t e d f o r t h e
m o d e l g i v e n . T h e n o n o r t h o g o n a l n a t u r e o f
t h e d a t a r e q u i r e d t h e s o l u t i o n o f t h e l e a s t
s q u a r e s e q u a t i o n s , w h i c h a m o u n t e d t o a s e t o f
1 9 9 eq u a t i o n s i n t h e A n g u s b r eed . T h e s i z e o f
t h e co m p u t e r , t h e r e f o r e , s e t a l i m i t t o t h e s i z e
o f t h e m o d e l w h i c h c o u l d b e d e a l t w it h . T h e s e
e q u a t i o n s w e r e s o l v e d b y p a r t i t i o n i n g a n d a b -
s o r p t i o n . A n a l y s i s o f v a r i a n c e f o r b o t h b r e e d s
f o r A D G i s g i v en i n t ab l e 3 .
A l l f o u r c l a s s e s o f m a i n e f f ec t s w e r e h i g h l y
s i g n i f i c an t s o u r ce s o f v a r i a t i o n . T h e s ex b y
a g e - o f - d a m i n t e r a c t i o n w a s n o n s i g n i f i c a n t ,
a n d t h e s e x b y y e a r i n t e r a c t i o n b o r d e r e d o n
s i g n i fi c an ce a t t h e 5 % l ev e l . B o t h o f t h e s e
i n t e r a c t i o n c l a s s e s w e r e t h e r e f o r e d r o p p e d
f r o m t h e m o d e l . T h e r e m a i n d e r s u m o f
s q u a r e s , w h i ch w as o b t a i n ed a s a d i f f e r en ce
b e t w e e n t h e s u m o f sq u a r e s d u e t o t h e u l t i m a t e
s e x b y a g e - o f - d a m b y y e a r b y h e r d - s i r e s u b -
c l a s s e s an d t h a t d u e t o t h e f u l l m o d e l , w as
u s ed t o t e s t a l l i n t e r ac t i o n s n o t s p ec i f i ed i n
t h e m o d e l . T h i s p r o v e d s i g n i f i c a n t , w h i c h i s
n o t s u r p r i s i n g , c o n s i d e r i n g t h e n u m b e r o f
d e g r e e s o f f r e e d o m i n v o l v e d . H o w e v e r , t h e
s m a l l s iz e o f t h e r e m a i n d e r m e a n s q u a r e s
s u g g e s t e d t h a t t h e m o d e l w a s a r e a s o n a b l e
o n e , a n d t h e a n a l y s i s w a s p u r s u e d w i t h t h e
m o d e l g i v en , w i t h t h e i n t e r ac t i o n c l a s s e s o m i t -
t ed an d t h e h e r d - s i r e c l a s s i f i c a t i o n b r o k en
d o w n i n t o h e r d s a n d s i re s - w i th i n - h er d s .
T h e m e t h o d o f a n a ly s i s u s e d w a s b a s e d o n
M e t h o d I I o f H e n d e r s o n ( 1 9 5 3 ) . T h i s is a
t w o - s t a g e p r o c e d u r e f o r t h e e s t i m a t i o n o f
v a r i a n c e c o m p o n e n t s i n m i x e d m o d e l s i t u a -
t i o n s , i n w h i ch t h e f i r s t s t ag e i s t h e l e a s t
by guest on July 14, 2014www.journalofanimalscience.orgDownloaded from
http://www.journalofanimalscience.org/http://www.journalofanimalscience.org/http://www.journalofanimalscience.org/8/11/2019 Cunningham e Henderson 1965.pdf
4/7
184
C U N N I N G H A M A N D H E N D E R S O N
T A B L E 3 . A N A L Y S I S O F V A R I A N C E F O R A V E R A G E D A I L Y G A I N
A n g u s
Sum of
Mean
S o u r c e d . f . s q u a r e s s q u a r e
H e r e f o r d
S u m o f M e a n
d . f. s q u a r e s s q u a r e
T o t a l 3 1 9 0 1 0 9 4 6 . 5 3
S e x 2 2 2 . 9 7 1 1 . 4 8 *
A g e o f d a m 6 1 2 . 6 0 2 . 1 0 *
Y e a r 1 1 1 . 8 7 0 . 1 7 *
S e x x a g e o f d a m 1 2 0 . 6 7 0 . 0 5
S e x x y e a r 2 2 1 . 6 0 0 . 0 7 *
H e r d - s i r e 1 20 8 9 . 3 3 0 . 7 4 * *
F u l l m o d e l 1 7 4 1 0 8 0 7 . 9 4 . .
U l t i m a t e s u b c l a s s e s 1 6 05 1 0 8 8 2 . 5 2
R e m a i n d e r 1 4 31 7 4 . 5 8 0 . ' 0 5 *
E c r o r 1 58 5 6 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 4
1 6 4 8 5 6 0 5 . 9 7
2 1 1 . 5 7 5 . 7 ; * *
6 4 . 8 7 0 . 8 1 *
1 1 4 . 5 3 0 . 4 1 *
1 2 0 . 6 9 0 . 0 5
2 2 2 . 6 3 0 . 1 1
5 4 5 9 . 5 0 1 . 1 0 *
1 0 8 5 5 0 0 . 7 8 . .
6 0 7 5 5 3 8 . 6 8
4 9 9 3 7 . 8 9 0 . 0 7 *
1 0 41 6 7 . 2 8 0 . 0 6
P < . 0 5 .
P < . O I .
s q u a r e s e s t i m a t i o n o f t h e f i x ed e f f e c ts a n d t h e
c o r r e c t io n o f t h e d a t a b y s u b t r a c t i n g f r o m
e a c h o b s e r v a t i o n a n a p p r o p r i a t e l i n e a r f u n c -
t i o n o f t h e s e e s t i m a t e s .
U n d e r c e r t a i n c o n d i t i o n s t h e l e a s t s q u a r e s
e s t i m a t e s o f t h e f i x e d e f fe c t s c a n b e i m p r o v e d .
T h i s p o s s i b i l i t y a r i s e s w h e n t h e f i x e d c l a s s e s
a r e u n e q u a l l y s p r e a d o v e r t h e r a n d o m c l a s s e s ,
s i n c e t h e d i f f e r e n c e b e t w e e n t h e c l a s s t o t a l s
f o r t h e l a t t e r w i l l t h e n c o n t a i n i n f o r m a t i o n
o n t h e f o r m e r . I n t h e p r e s e n t c a s e , f o r i n s t a n c e ,
t h e d i f f e r e n t y e a r s a r e u n e q u a l l y r e p r e s e n t e d
i n a l l h e r d s , a n d , t h e r e f o r e , t h e h e r d d i f f e r e n c e s
h a v e p a r t i a ll y c o n f o u n d e d w i th t h e m i n f o r m a -
t i o n o n t h e y e a r e f f e c t s . T h i s i n f o r m a t i o n c a n
b e re c o v e r e d a n d c o m b i n e d w i t h t h e r e g u l a r
l e a s t s q u a r e s e s t i m a t e s i n a j o i n t w e i g h t e d
s e t o f e s t i m a t e s , w h i c h w i ll b e a n i m p r o v e m e n t
o n t h o s e d e r i v e d b y r e g u l a r l e a s t s q u a r e s
m e t h o d s , p r o v i d e d t h a t t h e w e i g h t s a r e k n o w n
o r c a n b e e s t i m a t e d w i t h s u f f i c i e n t a c c u r a c y
a n d p r e c is i o n . T h i s r e c o v e r y i s r e la t i v e l y
s i m p l e in b a l a n c e d d a t a . I n u n b a l a n c e d c a s es ,
s u c h a s t h e p r e s e n t o n e , i t i s u s u a l l y i m p o s -
s i b le if c o n v e n t i o n a l a n a l y s e s a r e u s e d . T h i s
d i f fi c u lt y c a n b e o v e r c o m e b y t h e a p p l i c a t io n
o f a c o m p u t a t i o n a l p r o c e d u r e f o r t h e d e r i v a -
t io n o f m a x i m u m l ik e l ih o o d e s t i m a t e s , w h i c h
a p p l i e s i n m i x e d m o d e l s i t u a t i o n s u n d e r v e r y
g e n e r a l c o n d i t i o n s H e n d e r s o n , 1 9 5 2 , 1 9 6 3 ;
H e n d e r s o n
e t a l .
1 9 5 9 ) . T h e s e e s t i m a t e s a r e ,
i n f a c t , a u t o m a t i c a l l y w e i g h t e d l e a s t s q u a r e s
e s t i m a t e s . T h e w e i g h t s u s e d a r e v a r i a n c e
c o m p o n e n t s .
F r o m a c o m b i n a t i o n o f t h e s e t e ch n i q u e s
a n i t e r a t i v e p r o c e d u r e w a s d e v e l o p e d in w h i c h
w e i g h t e d l e a s t s q u a r e s e s t i m a t i o n o f t h e f i x e d
e f f e c ts i n t h e m o d e l a l t e r n a t e s w i t h v a r i a n c e
c o m p o n e n t e s t i m a t i o n . T h i s p r o c e d u r e i s d e -
s c ri b e d i n d e ta il b y C u n n i n g h a m 1 9 6 2 ) .
F o r t h e e s t i m a t i o n o f c o m p o n e n t s o f c o v a r i -
a n c e b e t w e e n t h e t r a i t s A D G a n d T S , t h e
r e g u l a r c o v a r i a n c e a n a l o g u e o f M e t h o d I I
H e n d e r s o n , 1 9 5 3 ) w a s u s e d . E s t i m a t e s o f
t h e h e r i t a b i l i t y o f e a c h t r a i t w e r e c o n s t r u c t e d
u s i n g t h e v a r i a n c e c o m p o n e n t e s t i m a t e s , a n d
t h e g e n e t i c , p h e n o t y p i c a n d e n v i r o n m e n t a l
c o r r e l a t i o n s b e t w e e n t h e t w o t r a i t s w e r e c o m -
p u t e d f r o m t h e e s t im a t e s o f th e v a r i a n c e a n d
c o v a r i a n c e c o m p o n e n t s .
R e s u l t s a n d i s c u s s i o n
F i x e d E f f e c t s . T h e e n v i r o n m e n t a l e f f e c t s f o r
w h i c h e s t i m a t e s w e r e o b t a i n e d w e r e t h e t h r e e
s e x es , s e v e n ag e s o f d a m a n d 1 2 y e a r s . I n f a c t ,
t h e s e p a r a m e t e r s w e r e n o t i n d i v i d u a l l y e s t i -
m a b l e , a n d t h e q u a n t i t i e s e s t i m a t e d w e r e t h e
d i f f e r e n c e s b e t w e e n p a r a m e t e r s w i t h i n e a c h
c l a s s i f i c a t i o n . T h e s e q u a n t i t i e s w e r e e s t i m a t e d
b y r e g u l a r l e a s t s q u a r e s , w e i g h t e d l e a s t
s q u a r e s , a n d b y t h e i t e r a t i v e e s t i m a t i o n p r o c -
e s s . T h e i t e r a t i v e p r o c e d u r e w a s c a r r i e d
t h r o u g h f o u r i t e r a t i o n s i n t h e c a s e o f t h e
A n g u s d a t a , a n d s e v e n in t h e H e r e f o r d d a t a ,
a t w h i c h p o i n t t h e e s t im a t e s a p p e a r e d t o h a v e
s t a b i l i z e d i n e a c h c a s e .
T h e r e l a t i v e e f f e c t i v e n e s s o f t h e d i f f e r e n t
s e t s o f e s t i m a t e s a s c o r r e c t i o n f a c t o r s w a s
m e a s u r e d b y u s i n g t h e m t o a d j u s t t h e d a t a
a n d t h e n c o m p a r i n g th e e q u a l i t y o f m e a n s
w i t h i n s ex , a g e o f d a m a n d y e a r c l as s e s. T h e r e
w a s l i t t l e d i f f e r e n c e b e t w e e n t h e e s t i m a t e s o b -
t a i n e d b y t h e w e i g h t e d l e a s t s q u a r e s a n d i t e r a -
t i v e p r o c e d u r e s a s m e a s u r e d b y t h e d i f f e r e n c e s
b e t w e e n t h e m e a n s w i t h i n c l a s s e s . T h e r e g u l a r
by guest on July 14, 2014www.journalofanimalscience.orgDownloaded from
http://www.journalofanimalscience.org/http://www.journalofanimalscience.org/http://www.journalofanimalscience.org/8/11/2019 Cunningham e Henderson 1965.pdf
5/7
E S T I M A T I N G W E A N I N G T R A I T S I N C A T T L E
1 8 5
l e a s t s q u a r e s e s t i m a t e s w e r e l e s s e f f e c t i v e a s
c o r r e c t i o n f a c t o r s . O f t h e t h r e e m e t h o d s o f
e s t i m a t i o n , t h e i t e r a ti v e p r o c e d u r e a p p e a r s
t o g i v e t h e b e s t e s t i m a t e s f o r u s e a s c o r r e c t i o n
f a c t o r s . T h e r e w a s e v i d e n c e t h a t t h e v a r i a n c e
o f t h e i t e r a t i v e e s t i m a t e s w a s l e ss t h a n t h a t
f o r t h e r e g u l a r a n d w e i g h t e d l e a s t s q u a r e s
e s t i m a t e s .
T h e e s t i m a t e s o b t a i n e d b y t h e i te r a t i v e p r o -
c e d u r e a r e p r e s e n t e d i n t a b l e 4 . T h e s e x ef fe c ts
a r e g i v e n a s d e v i a t i o n s f r o m t h e s t e e r e f f e c t ,
t h e a g e - o f - d a m e f f e ct s a s d e v i a t i o n s f r o m t h e
7 - t o 1 0 - y e a r a g e g r o u p e f f e c t a n d t h e y e a r
e f f e c t s a s d e v i a t i o n s f r o m t h e 1 9 5 5 e f f e ct .
T h u s , t h e v a l u e s f o r se x a n d a g e o f d a m m a y
b e u s e d , w i t h s i g n s r e v e r s e d , a s c o r r e c t i o n
f a c t o r s to a d j u s t A D G a n d T S v a l u e s to a
s t a n d a r d v a l u e r ep r e s e n t e d b y t h e c a l f f r o m
a c o w a g e d 7 t o 1 0 y e a r s .
T h e p a t t e r n o f t h es e e s t i m a t e s c o n f o r m s
w i t h t h a t t o b e f o u n d i n t h e e x t e n s i v e l i t e ra -
t u r e . T h e p a r a l l e l a n a l y s e s fo r th e t w o
b r e e d s a g r e e w e l l i n t h e s e x a n d a g e - o f - d a m
e s t i m a t e s . B u l l c a l v e s g r o w f a s t e r t h a n s t e e r s ,
a n d s t e e r s fa s t e r t h a n h e i f e r s . B u l l c a l v e s a l s o
g r a d e b e t t e r t h a n s t e e r s o r h e if e r s , b u t h e i f e r s
g r a d e c o n s i d e r a b l y b e t t e r t h a n s t ee r s. T h e o b -
T A B L E 4 . E S T I M A T E S O F E N V I R O N M E N T A L
P A R A M E T E R S O B T A I N E D B Y I T E R A T I V E
E S T I M A T I O N P R O C E D U R E
Angus Here ford
I te m A D G T S A D G T S
ex
Bull 0.108 0. 634 0.113 0. 499
He ifer - - . 142 0.532 -- . 107 0.307
Steer 0.000 0.000 0. 000 0. 000
Age of dam
2 - - . 2 6 1 - - . 4 9 7 - - . 2 6 4 - - . 4 7 4
3 - - . 1 5 9 - - . 0 6 3 - - . 1 9 2 - - . 2 8 8
4 - - .0 69 0 .106 - - .0 81 0 .146
5 - - . 03 6 0 .056 - - . 027 0 .212
6 - - . 025 0 .059 - - . 01 0 0 . . 127
7-10 0 .000 0 .000 0 .000 0 .000
~ 1 0 - - . 0 2 9 - - . 5 6 5 0 .0 22 - - . 0 9 0
Y e a r
1949 0.085 1.350 0.04 6 0.491
1950 0.067 0.587 0.02 0 0.391
1951 0.082 0.674 0.003 0.91 0
1952 0.055 0.271 0.02 4 0.254
1953 0.005 0.408 -- .0 09 0.556
1954 0.013 -- .2 05 0.113 0.673
1955 0 .000 0 .000 0 .000 0 .000
1956 - - . 01 0 - - . 0 30 0 .031 0 . 728
1 95 7 - - . 0 8 8 - - . 2 4 4 - - . 2 7 0 - - . 6 2 8
1958 - - . 07 8 - - . 291 - - . 082 0 . 360
1959 - - . 051 - - . 40 8 - - . 15 7 - - 1 . 270
1 96 0 - - . 0 0 1 - - . 1 9 2 - - . 0 5 7 - - . 4 4 5
s e r v e d d i f f e re n c e s b e t w e e n b u l l s a n d s t e e r s a r e
i n p a r t a t t r i b u t a b l e t o t h e e f f ec t s o f s e l e c t io n ,
i n t h a t b r e e d e r s t e n d t o s a v e t h e h e a v i e r ,
h i g h e r g r a d i n g c a l v es a s b u l ls a n d t o c a s t r a t e
t h e r e m a i n d e r . T h e w e i g h t e d m e a n o f t h e m a l e
c a l v es f o r A D G w a s 0 .1 5 8 A n g u s ) a n d 0 . 16 0
H e r e f o r d ) h i g h e r t h a n t h e m e a n f o r f e m a l e s ,
a n d fo r T S w a s 0 . 4 5 4 A n g u s ) a n d 0. 1 53
H e r e f o r d ) b e lo w th e f em a l e m e a n . A D G i m -
p r o v e s w i t h a g e o f d a m i n a c u r v i l i n e a r f a s h i o n
t o a m a x i m u m a t 7 to 1 0 y e a r s o r o v e r . T h e
s a m e p a t t e r n h o l d s t r u e f o r T S , e x c e p t t h a t
t h e v a lu e s t e n d t o re a c h a m a x i m u m a t e a r l i e r
a g e s 4 t o 5 y e a r s ) a n d t o d e c l i n e a f t e r t h a t
a g e . T h e e f fe c t o f s e l e c t i o n a m o n g c o w s w a s
i g n o r e d in t h e c o m p u t a t i o n o f th e s e a g e -o f -
d a m e ff ec ts , w h i c h m a y b e b i a s e d u p w a r d a s
a r e s u l t L u s h a n d S h r o d e , 1 9 5 0 ) . T h e s i g n i fi -
c a n c e o f t h e s e p o s s i b l e b i a s e s i n b e e f c a t t l e
t r a i t s i s d i s c u s s ed b y K o c h a n d C l a r k 1 9 5 5 a ) .
A s l i g h t b r e e d d i f f er e n c e d o e s s h o w u p i n
t h e e s t i m a t e s o f t h e y e a r e f f e c t s . T h e A n g u s
d a t a a p p e a r t o b e le s s v a r i a b l e t h a n t h e
H e r e f o r d . T h i s i s p r o b a b l y a r e f l ec t io n o f
d i ff e re n c es i n t h e a v e r a g e h e r d e n v i r o n m e n t
f o r th e t w o b r e e d s . T h e d e c l in e in A D G o v e r
t h e p e r i o d s t u d i e d , w h i c h i s i n d i c a t e d b y t h e
e s t i m a t e s o f t h e y e a r e f f e c ts , m a y b e d u e t o
t h e g r a d u a l i n c l u s i o n i n t h e p r o g r a m i n t h e
l a t e r y e a r s o f h e r d s w i t h p o o r e r e n v i r o n m e n t
o r g e n e t i c m a t e r i a l .
Components o] Variance and Covariance
T h e e s t i m a t i o n o f c o m p o n e n t s o f v a r i a n c e f o r
b o t h t r a i t s w a s c a r r i e d o u t o n a w i t h i n - b r e e d
b a s i s, u s i n g m o d i f i c a t i o n s o f M e t h o d I I H e n -
d e r s o n , 1 9 5 3 ) . T h e d a t a w e r e fi r st c o r r e c t e d
f o r s e x , a g e - o f - d a m a n d y e a r e f f e c t s . M e a n
s q u a r e s w e r e th e n c o m p u t e d f o r h e r d s , s i re s ,
h e r d s b y y e a r s a n d e r r o r . F i n a l l y , t h e s e m e a n
s q u a r e s w e r e e q u a t e d t o t h e i r e x p e c t e d v a l u e s
a n d t h e r e s u l t i n g e q u a t i o n s w e r e s o l v e d f o r
t h e r e q u i r e d v a r ia n c e c o m p o n e n t s . T h e p r o -
p o r t i o n o f t h e v a r i a t i o n i n th e a d j u s t e d r e c o r d s
w h i c h w a s d u e t o e a c h o f t h e s e s o u r c e s i s i n -
d i c a t e d i n ta b l e 5 . T h e b r e a k d o w n o f t h e v a r i -
a t i o n i s s i m i l a r fo r b o t h t r a i t s a n d b o t h b r e e d s .
T h e f a c t t h a t a g r e a t e r p r o p o r t i o n o f t h e
v a r i a n c e f o r T S i s i n r e s i d u a l a n d l e s s i n h e r d s
m a y r e fl e ct th e s u b j e c t i v e n a t u r e o f t h e t y p e
s c o r in g p r o c e d u r e , o r p o s s i b l y t h a t h e r d e n -
v i r o n m e n t h a s a g r e a t e r e ff ec t o n A D G t h a n
o n T S .
T h e a c t u a l e s t i m a t e s o f t h e v a r i a n c e a n d
c o v a r i a n c e C o m p o n e n t s n e e d e d i n t h e c o m p u -
t a t i o n o f h e r i t a b i l i t i e s a n d c o r r e l a ti o n s a r e
by guest on July 14, 2014www.journalofanimalscience.orgDownloaded from
http://www.journalofanimalscience.org/http://www.journalofanimalscience.org/http://www.journalofanimalscience.org/8/11/2019 Cunningham e Henderson 1965.pdf
6/7
186
TABLE 5. PERCENT OF VARIATION IN SEX,
AGE OF DAM AND YEAR ADJUSTED
RECORDS WHICH IS DUE TO
VARIOUS SOURCES
Angus
Source ADG TS
CUNNINGHAM AND HENDERSON
herd heritability requires, in addition, the as-
sumption that all herd-to-herd variation is
nongenetic. The values for both traits in each
breed are given in table 7.
Hereford These values fall within the range of those
ADG TS repor ted elsewhere (Warwick, 1958), but
are considerably larger than most of the esti-
15 3 mates in the literature, which indicate a value
10 11 close to 0.3 for AD G and 0.2 for TS. It seems
3 5
72 81 probable tha t the present values are overesti-
mates resulting from biases in the variance
component estimates. This is borne out by
the values of 0.48 and 0.28 obtained for the
repeatability of these traits in the same data
(Cunningham and Henderson, 1965).
Several factors may contribute to the infla-
tion of the heritability estimates. The denom-
inator may be reduced due to underestimation
of ~r2e, resulting from correlated errors. Since
a2e is the within-sire-herd-subclass variance,
TABLE 7. ESTIMATES. OF THE HERITABILITY
OF ADG AND TS
Herds 18 9
Sires 11 11
Herds x years 9 6
Residual 62 74
given in table 6. The necessary components
a r e
a2 n= her d component of variance
~2s/~i=sire-within-herd component of vari-
ance
a2e=-error component of variance
(ri2s/R= sire-within-herd component of co-
variance
alze=err or component of covariance
The values obtained separately for the two
breeds show good agreement except that the
herd component of variance is considerably
larger for the Angus than for the Hereford
data. The greater inherent variability of the
Hereford records is reflected in the larger error
components of variance and covariance for
that breed.
Heri tab i l i t i e s The heritability of each trait
was computed from the variance component
estimates on both an intra- and inter-herd
basis, using the formulas
4 0 " 2 8 / H 4 O ' 2 S / H
h 2 i n t r a - a n d h 2 1 n t e r ~
~ - b ~ ' ~ 9 ~ - t- ~
h e s e formulas require the following as-
sumptions: (1) that identifiable environmental
variation has been corrected for, (2) that
e p i s t a t i c gene action may be neglected, (3)
that there is random mating with respect to
the genes involved in this trait, (4) that the
frequencies of these g e n e s a r e stable, and
(5) that the effects of these genes, as devia-
tions from the mean, do not change from one
generation to the next. The formula for inter-
TABLE 6. ESTIMATES OF COMPONENTS OF
VARIANCE AND COVARIANCE FOR
ADG AND TS
B r e e d T r a i t ~ 2 H a ~ s / H ~ r2 e a 1 2 S / H ~ 1 2 e
A D G 0 . 0 1 2 0 0 . 0 0 7 0 0 . 0 4 0 4
A n g u s T S 0 . 2 9 4 9 0 . 3 6 9 5 2 . 3 9 6 4 0 . 0 4 6 7 0 . 0 6 2 4
A D G 0 . 0 1 3 0 0 . 0 0 9 2 0 . 0 6 4 6
H e r e f o r d T S 0 0 9 1 8 0 . 3 5 2 7 2 . 5 5 7 1 0 . 0 3 0 4 0 ' . 1 4 70
Heritability estimate
Breed Trait Intra-herd Inter-herd
Angus ADG 0. 590 0. 471
TS 0. 534 0.483
Hereford 1-)G 0.400 0.425
TS 0.485 0.410
the fact that observations within such a sub-
class may be repeated records on the same
dam, or records on closely related dams would
reduce the estimate. It could also be reduced,
and the estimate of sire variance simultan-
eously increased by any differential or assorta-
tive mating, i.e., by mating the better cows
with one sire, the poorer with another. Though
the records were corrected for age of dam,
differential mating of dam might have a similar
effect. Furthermore, the fact that sires were
partially compounded with years would have
an inflationary effect on the sire variance if
an interaction of sires with years existed and
was ignored in the analysis. All these factors
tend to bias the ratio
O- 2 ~ ,TT
O ' 2 S / H + 0 ~ e
upward. This ratio is multiplied by four to
give heritability, and hence even a moderate
bias in the variance components would result
in a large bias in the heritability.
An alternative interpretation of these high
heritability estimates is that there exists con-
by guest on July 14, 2014www.journalofanimalscience.orgDownloaded from
http://www.journalofanimalscience.org/http://www.journalofanimalscience.org/http://www.journalofanimalscience.org/8/11/2019 Cunningham e Henderson 1965.pdf
7/7
E ST I MAT I NG W E ANI N G T R AI T S I N C AT T L E
187
TABLE 8. ESTIMATES OF CORRELATIONS
BETWEEN ADG AND TS
Correlation Angus Hereford
Genetic 0.61 0.36
Phenotypic 0.28 0.36
Environmental -- . 95 0.37
siderably more additive genetic variation for
these traits in New York commercial beef
herds. There may be some truth in this, be-
cause all the reports from elsewhere are based
on few and large herds, often at experiment
stations, in which selection may have reduced
the genetic variability.
Correlations. The genetic, phenotypic and
enviro nmenta l correlations between the two
traits were computed from the variance and
covariance component estimates of table 7.
The values obtained are given in table 8.
The estimates agree with some of those
reported in other studies Koch and Clark,
1955b; Lehmann e t a l . 1961). However,
the large discrepancy between the values for
the two breeds reduces the value of these
estimates. Furthermore the sampling variance
of the estimates is probably quite large, and
the possible biases affecting the heritability
estimates ma y also influence these correlations.
There appears to be a positive and fairly large
genetic relationship between these two traits.
Su m m a r y
The genetic and phenotypic parameters of
average daily gain from birth to weaning
ADG ) a nd type score at weaning TS) have
been evaluated from 4,838 records on beef
cattle in New York. The records were drawn
from 39 herds with 121 sires of the Angus
breed and from 16 herds with 55 sires of
the Hereford breed for the years 1949 to 1960
inclusive.
The data were tested for the presence of
interaction effects. Estimates were obtained
by an iterative procedure of the effects of sex,
age-of-dam and year differences on the two
traits. The records were adjusted for these
fixed effects and components of variance and
covariance were estimated for herds, sires,
herds by years, and error. These components
were used to compute estimates of the herit-
ability of each trait and of the genetic, pheno-
typic and enviro nmental correlations between
them.
L i t e r a t u r e C i t e d
Cunningham, E. P. 1962. Estimation of genetic and
phenotypic parameters in a beef cattle population.
Ph.D. Thesis. Cornell University, Ithaca, New
York.
Cunningham, E. P. and C. R. Henderson. 1965.
Repeatability of weaning traits in beef cattle. J.
Animal Sci. 24:188.
Henderson, C. R. 1952. Specific and general combin-
ing ability. In Heterosis J. W. Gowen, Editor).
Iowa State College Press, Ames, Iowa.
Henderson, C. R. 1953. Estimation of variance and
covariance components. Biometrics 9:226.
Henderson, C. R. 1963. Selection index and expected
genetic advance. Statistical genetics and plant
breeding. National Academy of Sciences--National
Research Council publication No. 982.
Henderson, C. R., O. Kempthorne, S. R. Searle and
C. M. von Krosigk. 1959. The estimation of envi-
ronmental and genetic trends from records subject
to culling. Biometrics 15:192.
Koch, R. M. and R. T. Clark. 1955a. Influence of
sex, season of birth and age of dam on economic
traits in range beef cattle. J. Animal Sci. 14:386.
Koch, R. M. and R. T. Clark. 1955b. Genetic and
environmental relationships among economic char-
acters in beef cattle. I. Correlation among paternal
and maternal half-sibs. J. Animal Sci. 14:775.
Lehmann, R. P., J. A. Gaines, R. C. Carter, K. P.
Bovard and C. M. Kincaid. 1961. Selection indexes
for weanling traits in beef calves. J. Animal Sci.
20:53.
Lush, Jay L. and Robert R. Shrode. 1950. Changes
in milk production with age and milking fre-
quency. J. Dairy Sci. 33:338.
Snedecor, G. W. and Gertude M. Cox. 1935. Dis-
proportionate subclass numbers in tables of mul-
tiple classification. Iowa Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Bul.
180.
Swiger, L. A. 1961. Genetic and environmental in-
fluences on gain of beef cattle during various
periods of life. J. Animal Sci . 20:183.
Warwick, E. J. 1958. Fifty years of progress in
breeding beef cattle. J. Animal Sci. 17:922.
by guest on July 14, 2014www.journalofanimalscience.orgDownloaded from
http://www.journalofanimalscience.org/http://www.journalofanimalscience.org/http://www.journalofanimalscience.org/