Pacific Disaster CenterArea Brief: GeneralExecutive Summary

HONOLULU

17:15:2312 Jun 2017

NORTHDAKOTA/NEW

SALEM

22:15:2312 Jun 2017

WASH.D.C.

23:15:2312 Jun 2017

ZULU

03:15:2313 Jun 2017

NAIROBI

06:15:2313 Jun 2017

BANGKOK

10:15:2313 Jun 2017

Region Selected » Lower Left Latitude/Longitude: 40.1908 N˚ , -105.0396 E˚Upper Right Latitude/Longitude: 46.1908 N˚ , -99.0396 E˚

Current Hazards:

Active Tornado

Event Severity Date (UTC) Name Lat/Long

13-Jun-2017 02:41:23 Tornado - Rapid City, SD WFO Region, US 43.19° N / 102.04° W

13-Jun-2017 02:39:20 Tornado - North Platte, NE WFO Region, US 42.21° N / 102.41° W

13-Jun-2017 02:09:21 Tornado - Cheyenne, WY WFO Region, US 42° N / 102.85° W

13-Jun-2017 00:59:18 Tornado - Cheyenne, WY WFO Region, US 41.91° N / 103.35° W

12-Jun-2017 23:39:29 Tornado - Rapid City, SD WFO Region, US 44.06° N / 103.03° W

12-Jun-2017 23:37:23 Tornado - North Platte, NE WFO Region, US 42.35° N / 101.64° W

12-Jun-2017 19:13:22 Tornado - Cheyenne, WY WFO Region, US 42.41° N / 104.11° W

Source: PDC

Lack of Resilience Index:Lack of Resilience represents the combination of susceptibility to impact and the relative inability to absorb, respond to, and recover from negative impactsthat do occur over the short term. United States ranks 149 out of 165 on the Lack of Resilience index with a score of 0.22.

170,000

Legend

Population Density (person/sqkm)

0

Additional information and analysis is available for Disaster Management Professionals. If you are a Disaster Management Professional and would like toapply for access, please register here. Validation of registration information may take 24-48 hours.

Tornado - Cheyenne, WY WFO...Location: Wyoming, United StatesSeverity Level: Watch

Tornado - North Platte, NE...Location: Nebraska, United StatesSeverity Level: Watch

Situational Awareness

United States ranks 149 out of 165 on the Lack of Resilience Index. Based on the sub-component scores related to Vulnerability and Coping Capacity, thethree thematic areas with the weakest relative scores are Recent Disaster Impacts, Environmental Stress and Economic Constraints.

Source: PDC

Population Data:

2011

Total: 961, 232Max Density: 11, 805(ppl/km2)

Source: iSciences

Cheyenne - 50,000 to 99,999

Pierre - Less than 50,000

Populated Areas:

Multi Hazard Risk Index:United States ranks 121 out of 165 on the Multi-Hazard Risk Index with a score of 0.41. United States is estimated to have relatively high overall exposure,low vulnerability, and very high coping capacity.

Source: PDC

Lack of Resilience Index:Lack of Resilience represents the combination of susceptibility to impact and the relative inability to absorb, respond to, and recover from negative impactsthat do occur over the short term. United States ranks 149 out of 165 on the Lack of Resilience index with a score of 0.22.

United States ranks 149 out of 165 on the Lack of Resilience Index. Based on the sub-component scores related to Vulnerability and Coping Capacity, the

Additional information and analysis is available for Disaster Management Professionals. If you are a Disaster Management Professional and would like toapply for access, please register here. Validation of registration information may take 24-48 hours.

Additional information and analysis is available for Disaster Management Professionals. If you are a Disaster Management Professional and would like toapply for access, please register here. Validation of registration information may take 24-48 hours.

Lowest (0) Highest (1)

Regional Overview

Cheyenne Pierre0

50 000

100 000

150 000

Risk & Vulnerability

LowestRisk (0)

HighestRisk (1)

Lowest (0) Highest (1)

Brazil

United States

Australia Brazil China

Russia Nigeria

United States

Australia ChinaRussia

Nigeria

United States

Australia Brazil China

Russia Nigeria

three thematic areas with the weakest relative scores are Recent Disaster Impacts, Environmental Stress and Economic Constraints.

Source: PDC

Historical Hazards:

Earthquakes:

5 Largest Earthquakes (Resulting in significant damage or deaths)

Event Date (UTC) Magnitude Depth (Km) Location Lat/Long

11-Apr-2016 05:07:27 3.20 5 37km NNE of Thedford, Nebraska 42.31° N / 100.46° W

06-Nov-2016 16:57:19 3.10 6.81 8km ENE of Greeley, Colorado 40.46° N / 104.62° W

06-Nov-2016 16:57:14 2.70 6.55 7km ENE of Greeley, Colorado 40.46° N / 104.63° W

23-Aug-2016 03:14:13 2.60 5.47 7km NE of Greeley, Colorado 40.48° N / 104.66° W

25-Aug-2016 08:27:36 2.50 3.82 6km NE of Greeley, Colorado 40.47° N / 104.66° W

Source: Earthquakes

Wildfires:

5 Largest Wildfires

Event Start/End Date(UTC) Size (sq. km.) Location Mean Lat/Long

25-Aug-2000 00:00:00 - 03-Sep-2000 00:00:00 32.10 United States 43.82° N / 103.89° W

31-Aug-2002 00:00:00 - 07-Sep-2002 00:00:00 27.60 United States 45.65° N / 104.14° W

Additional information and analysis is available for Disaster Management Professionals. If you are a Disaster Management Professional and would like toapply for access, please register here. Validation of registration information may take 24-48 hours.

Historical Hazards

Dec 25 2015Earthquakes

6km NE of Greeley,Colorado

Dec 03 1999FiresUnited States

Dec 23 2015Earthquakes

7km NE of Greeley,Colorado

Apr 11 2016Earthquakes

37km NNE of Thedford,Nebraska

Nov 06 2016Earthquakes

7km ENE of Greeley,Colorado

Nov 06 2016Earthquakes

8km ENE of Greeley,Colorado

Dec 07 2001FiresUnited States

1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020

Event Start/End Date(UTC) Size (sq. km.) Location Mean Lat/LongSource: Wildfires

* As defined by the source (Dartmouth Flood Observatory, University of Colorado), Flood Magnitude = LOG(Duration x Severity x Affected Area). Severityclasses are based on estimated recurrence intervals and other criteria.

The information and data contained in this product are for reference only. Pacific Disaster Center (PDC) does not guarantee the accuracy of this data. Refer tooriginal sources for any legal restrictions. Please refer to PDC Terms of Use for PDC generated information and products. The names, boundaries, colors,denominations and any other information shown on the associated maps do not imply, on the part of PDC, any judgment on the legal status of any territory, orany endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries.

Disclosures