6
Cynthia Rosenzweig 1 , Jim Jones 3 , Jerry Hatfield 4 , Alex Ruane 1 , and Jonathan Winter 2 1 NASA GISS, 2 Columbia University, 3 University of Florida, 4 USDA-Ames American Geophysical Union, AgMIP Town Hall December 4th, 2012 Sonali McDermid 1

Cynthia Rosenzweig 1, Jim Jones 3, Jerry Hatfield 4, Alex Ruane 1, and Jonathan Winter 2 1 NASA GISS, 2 Columbia University, 3 University of Florida, 4

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Cynthia Rosenzweig 1, Jim Jones 3, Jerry Hatfield 4, Alex Ruane 1, and Jonathan Winter 2 1 NASA GISS, 2 Columbia University, 3 University of Florida, 4

Cynthia Rosenzweig1, Jim Jones3, Jerry Hatfield4, Alex Ruane1, and Jonathan Winter2

1NASA GISS, 2Columbia University, 3University of Florida, 4USDA-Ames

American Geophysical Union, AgMIP Town HallDecember 4th, 2012

Sonali McDermid1

Page 2: Cynthia Rosenzweig 1, Jim Jones 3, Jerry Hatfield 4, Alex Ruane 1, and Jonathan Winter 2 1 NASA GISS, 2 Columbia University, 3 University of Florida, 4

• Incorporate state-of-the-art climate products as well as crop and agricultural trade model improvements in coordinated regional and global assessments of future climate impacts

• Include multiple models, scenarios, locations, crops and participants to explore uncertainty and impact of data and methodological choices

• Collaborate with regional experts in agronomy, economics and climate to build strong basis for applied simulations addressing key climate-related questions

• Improve scientific and adaptive capacity for major agricultural regions in the developing and developed world

• Develop framework to identify and prioritize adaptation strategies

• Link to key on-going efforts– CCAFS, Global Futures, Harvest Choice, Yield Gap Atlas, SERVIR– National Research Programs, National Adaptation Plans, IPCC, ISI-MIP

2

Objectives

Page 3: Cynthia Rosenzweig 1, Jim Jones 3, Jerry Hatfield 4, Alex Ruane 1, and Jonathan Winter 2 1 NASA GISS, 2 Columbia University, 3 University of Florida, 4

• Incorporate state-of-the-art climate products as well as crop and agricultural trade model improvements in coordinated regional and global assessments of future climate impacts

• Include multiple models, scenarios, locations, crops and participants to explore uncertainty and impact of data and methodological choices

• Collaborate with regional experts in agronomy, economics, and climate to build strong basis for applied simulations addressing key climate-related questions

• Improve scientific and adaptive capacity for major agricultural regions in the developing and developed world

• Develop framework to identify and prioritize adaptation strategies

• Link to key on-going efforts

– CCAFS, Global Futures, MOSAICC, Yield Gap Analysis, SERVIR, MACSUR …

– National Research Programs, National Adaptation Plans, IPCC, ISI-MIP …

Objectives

Page 4: Cynthia Rosenzweig 1, Jim Jones 3, Jerry Hatfield 4, Alex Ruane 1, and Jonathan Winter 2 1 NASA GISS, 2 Columbia University, 3 University of Florida, 4

Track 1: Model Improvement and Intercomparison

Track 2: Climate Change Multi-Model Assessment

Cross-Cutting Themes:

Uncertainty, Aggregation and Scaling,

Representative Agricultural Pathways

Driven by Data at Sentinel Sites

Silver

Gold

Platinum

Two-Track Science Approach

Page 5: Cynthia Rosenzweig 1, Jim Jones 3, Jerry Hatfield 4, Alex Ruane 1, and Jonathan Winter 2 1 NASA GISS, 2 Columbia University, 3 University of Florida, 4

Benefits include: - Improved capacity for climate, crop and economic modeling to identify and prioritize adaptation strategies - Consistent protocols, scenarios and data access - Improved regional assessments of climate impacts - Facilitated transdisciplinary collaboration and active partnerships - Contributions to National Adaptation Plans

= Wheat

= Maize

= Rice

0˚ 90˚-90˚

45˚

-45˚= Sugarcane

Morogoro

Ames

Wongan Hills

Delhi

Ludhiana

Ayr

Los Baños

Piracicaba

Shizukuishi

Rio Verde

La Mercy

HaarwegLusignan

Balcarce

Nanjing

AgMIP Sentinel Sites

Regions and Crop Model Pilots

Page 6: Cynthia Rosenzweig 1, Jim Jones 3, Jerry Hatfield 4, Alex Ruane 1, and Jonathan Winter 2 1 NASA GISS, 2 Columbia University, 3 University of Florida, 4

Capacity Building and Decision Making• Regional vulnerability • Adaptation strategies• Trade policy instruments• Technology exchange

Climate Team

Crop Modeling Team

Economics Team

Information Technology

Team

Improvements and Intercomparisons

• Crop models• Agricultural economic models• Scenario construction• Aggregation methodologies

Cross-Cutting Themes

• Uncertainty

• Aggregation and Scaling

• Representative Agricultural Pathways

Assessments•Regional•Global•Crop-specific

Key Interactions• Soils

• Water Resources

• Pests and Diseases

• Livestock and Grasslands

Teams, Linkages and Outcomes