Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
D-A127 621 INTEGRATED TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM (INTACS) /TOMATED SYSTEM MANAGEMENT INFORMATION PROCESSES(U)
MARTIN MARIETTA DENVER AEROSPACE CO 38 SEP 81
UNCLASSIFIED DAAK21-79-C -0161 F/fl 17/2 N
EhmhohhohmoiEsmhhhhhhhhhhhEhhhhhmhhhhhhIEhhhhhhhhhhhhIsmhhhhhhhhhhh
.16
•"1 10W2 .-iillin
uuiii1 im
1.25 11 1 1.4 hOL 6lll. lllll iuii
MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHARTNATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS-1%3-A
• , , ...... . . •
. .. . . . . .. .. .
INTACS AUTOMATED SYSTEM MANAGEMENT INFORMATION PROCESSES
Contract DAAK21-79-C-0161
September 30,- 1981
Prepared for:
Commandant, USASC & FG
Fort Gordon, Georgia
Martin Marietta Aerospace
Denver Division
Denver, Colorado 80201
7. R T&
MMAY 4 1983 N
fcr P-LI:r;c'c2K aj
-(, isJ
FOREWORD
The INTACS Transition and Management Plan defined the Automated
System Management Information (ASMI) concept. The ASMI process provides
the operating guidelines, as well as the implementing and operating
procedures within the Systems Integration Management Office (SIMO) by
which all commands and agencies concerned with INTACS Transition will
receive timely reports and schedules. In order to implement the ASMI
concept, the procedures within SIMO as well as the interfaces with
external commands and agencies must be defined and put into a standard
operating procedure.
The INTACS Automated Systems Management Information Processes was
initiated to provide the link between the Automated Transition Plan and
the implementers of this plan. Through this system, users will receive
basic packages of transition reports and schedules on a periodic basis
and may request audit and reference information as required.
The INTACS Automated System Management Ihformation Processes was
*prepared by Martin Marietta Corporation for the U.S. Army Signal Center,
• " Directorate of Combat Developments in accordance with the provisions of
* Contract DAAK21-79-C-0161.
4(
DIIcopy
A-
-Iiii
.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PageForeword ....... ...................... . . . ..
Contents ........... ......................... ii
1.0 Introduction/Summary ....... ................ 1
1.1 Transition Planning ....... ............. 1
1.2 Architecture Processes ...... ............. 1
1.3 ASMI Concept ......... .................. 4
1.4 ASMI Procedures ....... ................ 4
1.5 ASMI Handbook ........ ................. 6
2.0 Architecture Change Processes ...... ............ 8
2.1 Procedure for Definition of Changes .. ...... 8
2.2 Impact Evaluation ....... ............... 10
2.3 Change Incorporation Process ... .......... .. 12
3.0 Automated System Management Information Reporting 19
3.1 Reports ....... .................... . 19
3.2 Schedule ........ .................... . 19
3.3 Management Approach .............. 19
4.0 ASMI Reports Procedures .. ........... ...... .. 25
4.1 Report Generation Control Procedures ....... . 25
4.2 Automated Logging Procedures ......... .... .28
4.3 Electronic Distribution and Input System ... 29
5.0 ASMI Programs and Users Reference Handbook ..... 32
APPENDICES
A. AIIMS Reports ........ .................... .A-1
B. Impact Evaluation Processes .... . ... ......... .B-I
C. Signal Personnel Requirements ...... ............ C-I
SIMO Reference Book 13 - ASMI Programs and USERS ReferenceHandbook (Separate Cover).
FIGURES
1-1 Transition Planning ........ ................. 2
1-2 Architecture Change Processes ...... ............ 3
1-3 ASMI Concept .......... .................... 5
. ii
FIGURES (Continued)aPage
1-4 SIMO Input, Output Distribution System .... ........ 7
2-1 Automated Architecture Impact Evaluation ........ . i.11
2-2 Expanded ASEP ........ .................... . 13
2-3 Automated Change Incorporation Process .. ........ . 16
3-1 Distribution Data Schedule Estimate .. ......... . 21
3-2 Distribution Planning Management Approach . ...... . 23
4-1 User Access and Logging Procedure ..... .......... 30
4-2 SIMO Input, Output Distribution System .. ........ . 31
TABLES
2-I Architecture Changes Definition Summary ... ....... 9
2-II Concept and Data Base Summary .... ............ . 14
2-111 Automated Concept and Data Base Summary Format 15
3-I Basic Report Package and Distribution .. ........ . 20
3-I Schedule Events ....... ................... ... 22
4-I Basic Report Package and Distribution .. ........ . 26
°
1.0 INTRODUCTION/SUMMARY
1.1 TRANSITION PLANNING
The Systems Integration Management Office (SIMO) approach to transition
planning supports intensive management of INTACS, requires valid inputs, and
is automated to provide timely outputs.
Figure 1-1 shows the SIMO transition planning approach which accepts
recurring inputs and results in continuously updated output Transition Plan.
While the INTACS progresses from current to future tactical communications
systems, the details of each step reside in the Automated Transition Manage-
ment System and data base.
SIMO developes and drives the Automated Transition Plan. Detailed equip-
ment/assemblage lists and a series of five (5) network force models depict
the transition to future systems. Major parts of the Plan are annual equipment
acquisition and distribution to specific units of the force. Planned expansion
'will incorporate training impacts considerations and personnel availability
in support of equipment according to fielding schedules.
The.Plan provides details to managers and project officers who are
engaged in implementing plans and actions. Then, the Auto-mated Transition
Management System is able to electronically read the status of these imple-
menting plans and actions. Planned specific forces, TOE or BOI, ?xpected
budget and cost and the current status of equipments in'the field are the major
related items.
The point of departure (Baseline) for any working and steering groups who
are considering changes to current or to future tactical coumunications should
* be the current set of Transition Plans as provided by SIMO. When approved, the
changes made by the working and steering groups appear as implementing plans
or actions, and result in changes to some or all of the inputs to SIMO. These
inputs and the outputs from SIMO are planned to be distributed by an automated
system within HQDA.
1.2 ARCHITECTURE PROCESSES (Figure 1-2)
*Within SIMO, the INTACS Architecture Integration Function drives the
* . Transition Planning and Implementation Functions. Changes to Architecture
4are handled in the steps: Changes Definition, Impact Evaluation and Incorporation.
4 i
Ha E-4 (iE-4 H U) ZC
0 0 ) ~ z z f
PI- z c
u U) E-i
zI>~ E-H E-40
~0 0 0
0H E-4 catE-
HI E-f rn cU
t H - -
&3 M
r1P4
HaC4z ___ _
H 0H H
0 04
Z taE-,O H
ouu HAE 00
* Z
C.)
U))
E-4'-
E--4
E4)z E-1 Z HE-HU
z z)1-4 '-' r3N
ra E- 04 81 rNH L) L m LEU
U ER
02 0
Listed on Figure 1-2 are the essential inputs that are necessary for
defining changes to the Architecture and Transition Plan. SIMO evaluates
the impact on a selected force of significant conceptual and implementation
changes using automated system evaluation and implementation programs.
After approval, changes are incorporated into the data base and into the
Architecture document.
1.3 ASMI CONCEPT (Figure 1-3)
This Automated System Management Information (ASMI) Process provides
L the operating guidelines, as well as the implementing and operating pro-
cedures, to establish the system within SIMO. This system will be the
means through which all commands and agencies concerned with the INTACS
Transition will receive timely reports and schedules. Update inputs through
the same automated system will further insure that reports and schedules
information is the latest available and that all users are working from
a common data base.
ASMI is interwoven with the management functions and structure of
SIMO so that it is inherently a part of the system (see Figure 1-3). Within
this context, it is an automated tool so that the managers involved can
start, modify and stop transitional processes in an effective manner. It
also provides a means of control of the process whereby excursions or modi-
fications of the transition program can be studied and compared without
any disruptive effects on projects in progress.
1.4 ASMI PROCEDURES
ASMI is designed to provide information to managers that will assist
them in performing their roles throughout the transition. Specific reports
are to be generated that show status at any period, overall and specific
requirements into the future and provide a means for comparing actual
progress versus planned. These reports establish a management means for
equipment planning, procurement and distribution as well as defining training
requirements and providing system evaluation information. The ASMI reports
" . . and schedules are provided to the users on a periodic and demand basis and
an automated log is kept to insure delivery as required. Local users are
4
* '
IMPLEMENTING PLANS AND ACTIONS:
AUTOMATED INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION
~4%*,*~( ~OUTPUTTRANSITION PLAN
* EQUIPMENT ACQUISITION
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM o LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT SHEET
* ASEP 0 EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION
0 PLANNED REQUIREMENT
oi ASMI o PERSONNEL AVAILABILITY
* AIIo FIELDING SCHEDULES.'-"io AIIMS
* EQUIPMENTS/ASSEMBLAGES
* 5 TRANSITION FORCE MODELS
Figure 1-3 ASMI CONCEPT
a5b "
-..- -+ .. . .. .
--
- provided over-the-counter service while remote users receive service via
" electronic mail by a computer/communications network (Figure 1-4).
1.-.5 ASMI REFERENCE HANDBOOK
'- This handbook provides a ready reference for SIMO on the functions
and contents of ASMI. Master program lists, user lists, report schedules
and program status are contained therein and are kept current through
[ automated update.
The remaining sections of this report expand the Architecture and
the ASMI processes of SIMO that are summarized in this first section.
-6
, 6
I. OPERATING 1PROGRAMS TO
PLANNING BOI LAEIOT
PESNE TANNOTHER DISTR
PNRODUTIONSCE
OTERD DISTRUTION RATESC
POM/DAMPL
4COP
Figur 1-4 IMO NP~j. OUTUT DITRIBTION YSTE
IIQ DLIVEY SCHDULE
2.0 ARCHITECTURE CHANGE PROCESSES
2.1 PROCESS FOR DEFINITION OF CHANGES
Changes to INTACS Architecture are defined by converting implementing plans/
actions such as computer records, approved documents and consultation with the
working group into the inputs required to update document and implementation
planning data base.
Working groups and action officers in tactical communications develop plans
and insert records into the TRADOC Automated Force Development centralized con-
puter files. When these records are available in that data base, changes to
Architecture can be defined through computer-assisted analysis. Mission Area
Analysis, O&O Concept and other documents also support changes, and where ambi-
guity exists, direct consultation with the working/action officer is employed.
Changes incurred fram Division-86 TOE series S,K,A and Mission Area Analysis are
summarized on Table 2-I as examples of implementing plans and actions which im-
pact on Architecture. These process for Architecture changes definition using
automated and manual analysis programs and the form of required input are listed
also.
The USASC&FG portion of Division-86 TOE series in the centralized computer
f"les are read electronically utilizing TRADOC TOi header list program-TEP 32.
Review of the TEP 32 printout reveals that implementation of the Division-86 TOE
series will cause restructure of the current AIM Division into a Heavy Division
structure for Armor or Mechanized Infantry and a Light Division structure for
Infantry. The next step determines what impact this restructure has on personnel
and equipment.
Using today's current "H" series AIM Division TOE as the baseline, TRADOC
Evaluation Program TEP 19 electronically reads the data base and provides output
*e prints that compare each Division-86 TOE in each series with the baseline. These
comparisons define changes in personnel and equipment that are planned to the
AIM Division by 1986. The input to be done manually and the form of input re-
quired to describe the change in Architecture is listed for each type of major
change. For example, an increase of 99 O&O personnel in the Division Signal
Battalion for the "S" series Heavy Division is shown. This personnel increase
is entered into the Architecture by manual update of the organizational diagram
page of the Unit Description Sheet. In addition, equipment with an IOC of 1986
has been added to the Division Signal Battalion and the issue basis defined.
a8oB
W CO CO Cn En1-H 9 CnU 1- C )6- .O ) - -
E-44
IL) to;OCOCO C
0 z-C z-C
-4 4 z H Z 1I-4 Z H
1-4- H H
i-I NCO HNO =-4 9 U ;::,
5 NH wNH pa H ca H 0 NH w H-m - N N N PQ N m
cnOH - 4 C.H H u H L) IL H 0- UH u 1-
CO c' p 0 9z5z 9zf~I 04 Crz p~i r- I
>4
*n 1-4 V- a- - - c -
A4 04 4 0 4 LP4* 0 0A4 A
1-4C O O
H t4 044 H Ha
on4 H: H- O134 0n 041- 0 )
0~- 4:4)44C E04 H- - =~ -4 COC E.04 iIN -0
~z I=C. z~ CO ztz- O C U 4: u.C C 0
0 U 2 0 NHz14 In . w 01 H- I- WI -
H- HH w HE-0 w :
0a w 0H - 0 o 00 0n 00 0 Y 9 nf
ad -o N %Go 00 HH %O E- w-Nz
tn 0 a4 4 L) A4 -4 c cn u 0 4 :cc =) 1-
w zC I IC4.
U) 00 H-
2 .
7" [ This equipment with a list of all it's components is mnoually input into the Archi-
ture in the form of Equipment Description Sheets. Defiiition of added equipment
issue basis is used as input to update Basis of Issue information for all equipment
in the data base and for major equipment in Architecture. The changes in TOE Series
K and A which reflect plans prior to 1986 are defined in a similar manner as listed
on Table 2-I.
Manual review of thu Mission Area Analysis documents identify O&O personnel
and equipments that will be fielded during the same time period covered by the
Division-86 TOE series S. However, these PLRS/JTIDS Hybrid and improved HF equip-
ments did not appear iii the TEP 19 TOE comparisons. Since ambiguity exists be-
tween Division-86 TOE sories computer files and Mission Area Analysis documents,
direct consultations btLween SIMO and the working groups that originated the records
is required. Upon resolution of the ambiguity, it is assumed the centralized com-
puter files will be updated to reflect the current information. The MAA also recom-
mended development of doctrine for a Division Area Multichannel System .which is al-ready in the Architecture.
There is an indication that the data contained in the Division-86 TOE series
S, K, and A is of questionable value and should eventually be put into historical
computer files. The pricess for change definition described here is valid, buit
will require manual revision unless accurate TOE records are inserted into the
centralized computer files. To realize the full value of automated analysis
programs for timely and accurate update of Architecture requires that centra-
lized computer files b: kept current.
The next section describes how automation supports the evaluation of im-
pact of these or other changes in Architecture.
2.2 IMPACT EVALUATION
Application of the evaluation process results in quantitative cost and
effectiveness data which details the impacts of changes to the architecture.
This data is useful as basis for: assessment of impacts, assuring system in-
tegrity, selection/justification of alternatives and decision.
The process focusi;s on comparisons of alternative equipments and O&O per-
sonnel in a selected force. As shown in Figure 2-1, the Automated System Eval-
uation Program (ASEP) op)erates with AIIMS and TOE analysis programs, and allows
manual selection of small to large force (military units) for modeling.
* Comparisons of equipments costs along with operations and support personnel
pay and allowance cost ire provided by the TOE analysis programs (TEP) which read
the automated TOE Seri-,, and equipment files. These three costs are in the primary
0 0
U) CJE-1
04~01
UO4W
* 0 -E-l H U
ca 64 z IU&a~
0 ca x
_____ 01
- 0H1
91 C4 0
_ _ _ _ _ _ U) 1
H LH
H U) r
I 4.
14
drivers of life cycle costs.
ASEP pulls frm AIIMS a base Force Model which reflects the transition phase
of interest, and then incorporate alternative equipments changes as delineated
by the current and planning TOE Series. Comparisons of quantitative measures of
- effectiveness, such as cube (volume), weight, power, reliability, maintainability
standardization and number of support personnel, are then provided for analysis.
The computer outputs of the Architecture Impact Evaluation Process are illustrated
and described in Appendix B.
Eventually, the ASEP is planned to be expanded to include total life cycle
costs and automated graphs as shown on Figure 2-2.
The next section describes how the Automated Transition Management System
aids the incorporation of changes into the Architecture and Transition Plan.
2.3 CHANGE INCORPORATION PROCESS
The Automated Transition Management System is used first as a tool to in-
corporate changes to Architecture, and then Architecture drives the Transition
Plan assuring complete consistency and rapid update. The loop is close to a
Concept and Data Base Summary Table which reflects and notifies the changes
that are in the data base.
The INTACS Architecture is flexible to changes in requirements, concepts.
equipments, and force structure. Personnel in SIMO will incorporate approved
changes easily, since the documentation is directly supported by Automated
System Management Information (ASMI). In the beginning, the Concept and Data
Base Summary on Table 2-II depicts introduced - equipments and support personnel
of the Communications Concept as they change in five stages of transition at low
to high echelons. The format for the automated Concept and Data Base Summary is
shown on Table 2-III.
The three steps of the Architecture Change Incorporation Process are summari-
zed on Figure 2-3"along with the relationships with ASMI. As a result of a sign-
ificant change, the Concept and Data Base Summary Table is automatically updated
to reflect the essence of the change in time-phasing, equipments and personnel.
This Table accurately depicts the Concept as actually embodied within the Auto-
mated Transition Management System. Procedures for architecture changes in Tran-
sition Concept, Communication Support Plan and Implementation guidelines chapters
of INTACS Architecture follow:
Step 1:
Input to AIIMS each added equipment described in the form of EDS to be located
12
H H
0 0
rz40 E-0
r. 0
E-44En Z
E404
11
134 G
L) U)
E-4 041
14cn 0
10H
13
Utl- CO
t P9
0 0
v0
*013.4V
A o9
0 -.4
I(n
In 00.
4
.441
.44 0.4'U4).
41 4
Kn MN4 toK C ZII co13 A.
nj a0., 0 4 n nN.u
x ID1-4 0 M ouw
E-4 E4
0- 0
I4 4 -4 -4 C43 f
1-4 %D-
U)~~-. C4U (
1 =
IvI3
4.3 %!~
in 9 %
*----------- 0 u
"q (rnc t-, C. C.~ Ca <
tK t- - k--aa ~ C--c= a-,r- t- cl a-rcl- a-vT-c' 7- C,%- zr-a- al-a- a-* v-c C-9:a car~o crT C- C-a - -~ -a -aa- e-oTj'J' - c- - c a-I * - -z: Lr u- ' LJ .-
)ct >, :1.4 >e :14~C .r. "4 X- >
TcM cr=~ai, " -jt
Y -Ac
>r__a 'a-- L x 5e,)) -
4- --- *0e -
C X_ -*3 ,e x~)**
Ity c - 101c a -z r 11r UT .0 C-1 -- L cr - 0 r, ~ - -~- r L- C-a
C-a -- aac - -- -a -a 0- zu c-a-- s--a cC a- -an - a,- (.r- u
Ya- a-c-a- a--X. K~e >e __r~ -;r.
-1 C-
a-x --> >C.>C) c)
-~~~~~~~ .a- a- =Y-G - . a-- -- v--aa-Kv--a
x- x -Z a-C I- a- a-a
0 t-ra r4 c-
acr _Frz -l- t'i ... )
~Iy LL& cl >t _ _ _ _
* ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ > Y_ _a--I,.I -c u-,.4r e
X- x. AC~ Az' li Axp-X- e nX - -A
cc_ >L -? ' c
4g-a a .xx w >C -- 4 0- c->e 7,>C > 7e.-4E~
ela -- -- -- ---- -
_ _ _ .. . . . _ - %. -15 * - % -A
> 3K a" -J--8 74 >( X XI -.£ e
n-U > ,- .7 -7 x -w
4ca
H~~~- A- W- X 4K
Figure 2-3 AUTOMATED CHANGE INCORPORATION PROCESS
-STEP ARCHITECTURE AUTOMATED SYSTEM MANAGEMENT INFORMATION
CONCEPT AND DATAb-BASE.SUMMARYQTY O&S PERSONNEL
QTY EQUIPMENTS
I - EQUIPMENTS/ECHELON
(1) 01 EQUIP5MENT 15ESCRIPTTONSHEvT_ (EfDS).
EQUIPMENTS
-COMPONENTS '~BY TRANSITIONI PHASE (AIIMS)
() EQUIPMENTS DISTRIBUTION
*MAJOR EQUIPMENTSDISTRIBUTION
* UNIT DESCRIPTIONSHEET'(UDS)
-EQUIPMENT/UNIT -0TO AMS
QTY TOE IN ECHELON (7' TOELIST (ASEP)
DATA BASE
(3) u0 UDSERONL TP
-ORGANIZATION/PERSONNEL SMAIN
*.TRAINING IMPACTS
*PLANNED
* 16
in the Communications Support Plan Chapter of Architecture. Delete the replaced
equipments on AIIMS lists. An equipment assemblage component print-out is re-
turned as automated support of the Architecture document. Based on the given
critical-event, developmental milestones and IOC, the new equipments must be
*introduced in one of five force Models which places them in a particular time
frame. The next step involves who gets the equipment and what it replaces.
Step 2:
Read-in the distribution of the added equipments, and delete the replaced
equipments in the BOI-file of AIIMS for the particular Force Model affected.
For the Communications Support Plan Chapter, a print-out is returned to show
Major Equipment Distribution. The BOI-file serves as the basis for adding or
deleting significant equipments per echelon shown on the Concept and Data BAse
Summary Tab'e. Also, the TOE-file is automatically updated in AIIMS, and a
print-out is the updated equipment page of the Unit Description Sheet in the
Communications Support Plan Chapter.
An input definition of the quantity and type units in each echelon and
type equipments of interest to the ASEP program. TOELIST, results in the au-
tomated summation of each type equipment in each echelon, which is entered in
the Concept and Data Base Summary Table.
Step 3:
Provide the TOE organization diagram changes and signal personnel count
in numbers of Officer (OFF), Warrant Officer (WO), Enlisted (ENL), as on the
first page of the UDS in the Communication Support Plan Chapter. If the Changes
are available in a TOE Series file, the Comparison Program, TEP 19, provides a
listing of personnel by Grade and by MOS in each TuE. Summation results in totals
by grade and totals by echelon. These summations of communications support person-
nel are used for update in the Training Impacts Section of the Communications Sup-
port Plan Chapter and in the Concept and Data Base Summary Table.
While the TEP programs are effective, considerable time-consuming manualmani-
pulation of data is required to arrive at the personnel strength levels. There is
a need to develop a program which allows SIMO to directly access the TRADOC auto-
mated TOE personnel files at Ft. Leavenworth. A personnel program developed under
the INTACS Study was operational in 1975. This program summarized communications
0 support personnel in eight categories of MOS across a selected force model. This
personnel program, updated and modified to sum by Officer, Warrant Officer, and
0 17
Enlisted personnel categories is described in Appendix C. Re-establishment ofthis program, as modified, will support the automated update of the INTACS archi-tecture.
3.0 AUTOMATED SYSTEM MANAGEMENT INFORMATION (ASMI) REPORTING*
3.1 REPORTS
Reporting of System Management Information encompasses all the outputs
of the Automated Transition Management System, including Architecture Update
and System Evaluation Data, Acquisition and Distribution Implementation
Schedules, Summaries and Base Data. A basic package of five reports as
listed on Table 3-I is anticipated to be on automatic distribution four times
E -a year to the specific agencies listed. In addition, SIMO will distribute
baseline and evaluation data reports prior to working, Steering Committee
"- and special meetings where exceptions to the plan are to be resolved. Other
" reports, listed in Appendix A are for reference and/or audit purposes and
Iwill be distributed upon request.
3.2 SCHEDULE
Distribution of inputs and outputs by automated means is a key factor
for assuring delivery of data in time to support significant events. Figure
3-1 shows the periodic schedule for the electronic distribution of the inputs
required by SIMO and the outputs at MILDEP levels in support of the four
Planning, Programming, Budgeting System (PPBS) events listed. Table 3-I
describes the four supporting events.
The System Integration and Architecture Element of SIMO validates all
of the e.utomated reports provided by the ADP Implementation Element via the
Automated Transition Management System. For the reports on automatic distri-
bution, the Implementation Element has the responsibility of assuring timeli-
ness and notification of the proper individuals to provide validated infor-
mation in the reports.
3.3 MANAGEMENT APPROACH
The SIMO management approach for the provision of Automated System
Management Information which supports intensive management of the INTACS
L: transition is shown in Figure 3-2 and is summarized as follows:
1. As the INTACS transitions from current to the objective system, the
details of implementation reside in an extensive data base. With so many
factors involved, it is essential that the data base and distribution concept
,- be automated.
2. Recurring, validated inputs are provided by those agencies engaged in
V * Also appears in paragraph 2.5.4 of SIMO Handbook.
19
TABLE 3-I
BASIC REPORT PACKAGE DISTRIBUTION
PROGRAM TITLE
AIIMSPOO06 EQUIPMENT QUANTITIES JACQUISITION)
BASIC AIIMSPOO22 LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT SHEETS
REPORT AIIMSP0123 EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION
PACKAGE AIIMSPOO48 GENERIC BOI FORCE MODEL F-5
AIIMSPOO97 EQUIPMENT SUMMARY FORCE MODEL F-5
DA/ACSAC DA/DCSOPS DA/DCSPER
DA/DCSLOG DA/DCSRDA DA/OCA
AUTOMATIC DA/ACSI OCSA/MISD ASA/FM
DISTRIBUTION DARCOM TRADOC INSCOM
.USACC FORSCOM CECOM
USASC TRI-TAC TSM
Notes:
1. Basic Report Package, above, distributed automatically to usersin January, April, June and August.
2. Other reports, on attached Appendix A, Users Master List, are forreference and audit purposes and will be delivered upon request.
4 20
E-ii
zz
E-4 0 0
01
C.) E21
TABLE 3-I
SCHEDULE EVENTS
JANUARY SIMO ieceives set of inputs including priorities and!. force structure from DAMO-RQC and delivery schedules,
current assets and feeder data from DARCOM. SIMO submitsdistribution data for basis information to support reviewand conment of SecDef Consolidated Guidance to PlanningProgranming Budgeting System (PPBS).
APRIL SIMO receives set of inputs. SIMO submits distributiondata for basis information to support PPBS Program ObjectiveMemorandum (POM) and Five Year Defense Plan (FYDP) update.
JUNE SIMO receives set of inputs. SIMO submits distributiondata for basis information to support PPBS Program DecisionMemoranda (PDM).
AUGUST SIMO receives set of inputs. SIMO submits distributiondata for basis information to support PPBS budget estimatesand FYDP update.
K
i2"
u, _m . _ El E-. + . _ -. . .
0 z 0SZ 0
H 02 0) l4 C4
H H i~E-4E- Fr4< H
0 H U) n ) •: 0W H 4 H < 4
/ \) U) Z U) U
C) H Q2) 4OW
0. : 0 D
u 0 W w .Z H D o
U)I
p Z /
E-O E-
0 U 0
U)0 0 ~U
"'' U H- O OH J U'Z
H U)i z 0
"0 H U) . Hu 0 Q 0 *- wH -4
U) Z
• 0 O U)i n m OOI +
F' ) E U)
Q 0 2 H 0 H U) H004 U)1 H H 0 E-4O a4 n a4 r-4U) a,
U0 , 0 * ( O w 0 H -U) 00 wU C H fl4 U)H H-
HO 0 14 Q0 04 z U z0H 0 U
E- H E-4 H- E-4
' - E- H ; wU
E- 0 0-0 c~~~
00FA C) H QZ4E 0 4
H- 00 EA
E- Z~4C w r. CH 0 P4 > a
H4 u H
".-.4
W z H C) Z 0D
z 00
zO 4U)0 H U)1
0 OH n0 HOIn HU 04U) ~
0 w n HH W)U IO8 u C14a4 C4Z E U 0i 04 U:
Za H H- E-H$4 20 Z U0) 0 ZU0 U 0 p
H :D H 0 u 0D ~ H H H -
0~~ ~ ~ ~ a 0 U) H- a 1
0 z04400x 4 a
0w
4 23
tactical communications plans and actions. The loop is closed by returning
output distribution data to the same agencies. DARCOM assists TRADOC in
Sthe distribution planning effort by providing delivery schedule data,
current assets and other feeder data. Based on the distribution data
provided by SIMO, DARCOM develops materiel fielding plans and provides
periodic AMIM updates. DAMO-RQC provides guidance pertaining to distri-
bution priorities and force structure. All distribution/redistribution
concepts are forwarded to DAMO-RQC by DARCOM for coordination, approval
and publication as final distribution plans.
3. Distribution of both inputs and outputs to users is planned to be
automated within DA ACSAC to assure timely receipt of basic input data
and responsive delivery of output data.
4. SIMO develops and drives the Automated Transition Plan which includes
base information, acquisition and distribution data.
5. SIMO analyzes inputs and evaluates the impact of significant conceptual
and implementation changes to any of the phases of INTACS. Network transition
force models are developed to represent the phases and are used as the basis
for the distribution/redistribution concept. A series of five (5) force
models for current, transition and objective systems have been developed
to provide an orderly, compatible method of incorporating new equipment.
6. SIMO performs system integration and controls the outputs to insure
that the distribution of TRITAC and other new equipments results in an
optimal analog-digital hybrid architecture that is functional and supports
the needs of the local commander. The distribution/redistribution concept
is based on network transition to the INTACS objective architecture, force
structure, distribution priorities, interoperability and geographical
constraints. One form of the output distribution data is equipment assign-
ment to units of the force by year.
7. When the transition and distribution plans are established, significant
exceptions are reso'ved by special working groups and the INTACS Steering
Com.ittee (AR 15-23) using SIMO-furnished data as the baseline.
24
I
4.0 ASMI REPORTS PROCEDURES
4.1 REPORT GENERATION CONTROL PROCEDURES
A large and varied amount of reports and schedules are available to
users from operating programs acting upon the SIMO Data Base. Some 27
outputs have been identified and are available through existing programs.
Of these 27, those that deal with Force Models each have five outputs (F-1
through F-5). The total number will further increase by approximately ten
when the fielding schedule phase is implemented.
To avoid a voluminous, unmanageable and unnecessary Ilow of data,
- each user and their particular requirements have been analyzed. From this
a basic package of reports and schedules has been identified and consists
of only five outputs. These outputs are relatively brief so as to require
a minimum amount of time to transmit electronically. The remainder of the
" outputs are another format of the basic reports, a summary of the basic
reports or are reference and/or audit information to be furnished upon
request. The basic package, with the list of identified users, is shown in
Table 4-I and will be transmitted automatically at scheduled times. The
Master Users Liat of reports, by functional area and with illustrations, is
attached as Appendix A.
4.1.1 Acquisition/Distribution
This functional area consists of eight outputs of which three
will be contained in the basic package. Two are quality control assurance
of the input data and the remaining three are re-formatted version of basic
report outputs.
The reports in this area are the culmination of all the information in
the SIMO Data Base, together with the preceding programs, and form the basis
.4 upon which budget decisions and equipment distribution plans can be made.
New reports are generated each time there is a change in the budget, cost
or basis of issue.
4.1.2 Equipment/Assemblages
4 There are seven user outputs in this functional area with all
of them being available in the master form or in each Equipment Model from
F-I through F-5. None are included in the basic package but may be obtained
upon request. They provide equipment reference data and the location of the
items in the Force Models.
425
BASIC EPORT PACKAGE -
AIIMSPOO06 EQUIPMENT QUANTITIES (ACQ3IiITION)
AIIMSPOO22 LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT SHEETS
AIIMSP0123 EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTIION
AIIMSPOO48 GENERIC BOI FORCE MODEL F-5
AIIMSPOO97 EQUIPMENT SUMMARY FORCE MODXEL F-5
JAN APVR JN AU J'
DA/ACSAC- DA/DCSOPS DA/DCSPER
DA/DC SLOG DA/DCSRDA DA/OCA
DA/ACSI OCSA/MISD ASA/FM
UESDARCOM TRADOC INSCOM,
USACC FORSCOM C2ECON
USASC TRI-TAC TSMs
TABLE 4-I BASIC REPORT PACKAGE AND DISTRIBUTION
26
................................ .
4.1.3 POM Force
Only one program is available in this area, but it provides
the Force for each of the projected five years. The Master POM is already
available to all users, but the condensed force version may be obtained
upon request since this will provide the Force against which acquisition
and distribution schedules are run.
4.1.4 Force Models
This area consists of 11 basic user outputs with most of them
being available in consolidated format and in the Force M6del F-I through
F-5 versions. Two of these outputs are included in the basic package to
provide the user with ready reference data on BOI and a summary of the
force used.
These programs provide a variety of data on BOIs, TOEs, assemblages
and components as they relate to units, both generically and by the selected
force. They provide both reference data and an audit trail for the acquisition
and distribution schedules. Those not included in the basic package are
relatively lengthy, do not change frequently and, therefore, will be furnished
only upon special request.
4.1.5 Report Request Procedure
As stated above, the basic package will be sent automatically
to the listed, pre-selected users. Other agencies who have a requirement
for the basic package on a periodic or one-time basis may request same from
the U.S. Army Signal Center, Attn: ATZH-CDI. Other reports on the Master
Users List may be obtained in the same manner.
4.1.6 Internal Procedures
The Implementation Element of SIMO receives all requests for
reports to be generated through ASMI. They maintain the master schedule for
periodic reports and log/schedule requests for special reports, which are
all reports other than periodic.
When a request is received, the Documentation Index will be checked to
see if the report has a current validation. If the validation date is more
than three months old or if a data base update is involved, the AIIMS program
will be executed, through a work request to AIIMS, and the report sent to
the System Integration and Architecture Element of SINO for validation. After
validation, the newly validated report will be placed in the appropriate
27
SIMO Book (Table 1-2, INTACS Transition and Management Plan), The docu-
mentation Index will be updated, and the report will be released to the
Srequestor.
If validation is not required, a work request will be sent to AIIMS
where the report will be generated as per the procedures in paragraphs
4.1.7 and 4.2.
p4.1.7 Production ControlA Production Control position within 1he Implementation
K I.Elemnent of StMO is required to provide and control distribution of the
special and periodic production runs. This is a responsible position that
must provide positive assurance that the data base is validated prior to
the release of reports. The procedures for this position applicable to
special and periodic reports follows:
1. Associate the report request with the Documentation Index to determine
programs and files necessary to produce the report. Determine the
validation date of the data base required for production of the
requested report.
2. If the validation date is older than three months, acquire validated
information or the authorization to proceedfrom the Implementation
Element Chief.
3. Utilize the PrQgram Documentation Record for instructions; enter the
validation date, if new date is received, and execute programs to
produce the report.
4. Notify those users on electronic mail service that the report is ready
or deliver a copy of the report to the Implementation Chief for other users.
5. Refer to Automated Logging System (4.2) for the remaining procedure.
4.2 AUTOMATED LOGGING SYSTEM
Due to the large number of reports and the frequency with which they
are generated by computer, it is necessary to have an automated logging
system to control the distribution. This will permit management to insure,
first; that the report is generated as per schedule, and second; that the
user made access and received the report as scheduled.
When a report is generated, it will be placed into storage as a file
and the name of the report and address of the storage location placed in
the automated logging routine. The user will access the system by doing a
28
-0"system log-in" and then bringing up "SIMOLOG". This will activate the
routine for the automated logging system. The user enters his I.D. and the
report name which will automatically be transferred to a permanent log along
". with the time. After receiving the report, the user will log-out which will
verify that the report has been received and the information will again be
transferred to the permanent log. For local users, the same procedures will
be used but with the SIMO ADP Operators using the customer I.D. to obtain
his report. The report will then be sent to the SIMO Implementation Chief
who is responsible for making the delivery. A simplified flow diagram of the
system is shown in Figure 4-1.
The automated log will be printed out weekly with the copy going to the
Implementation Element who will compare the automated log with the master
schedule and special request log. Any discrepancies will be resolved through
coordination with the user.
4.3 ELECTRONIC DISTRIBUTION AND INPUT SYSTEM
4.3.1 Outputs
To be effective, the Automated System Management Information
(ASMI) process must be responsive to the users' requirements and provide
a reasonably fast computer turn-around and delivery service. Particular
emphasis is placed on this during the budgeting cycle when a baseline run
plus several variations may be required. During this time, short suspenses
develop and material may be required within two or three days.
The key to the successful operation of a responsive system is the
DA ACSAC Automated Information Distribution Center as shown in Figure 4-2.
The majority of the users, shown in Table 4-I, can be served through this
center. Once the information is compiled and put in storage. the user makes
electronic access as discussed in paragraph 4.2, Automated Tqging System.
4.3.2 Inputs
Also shown in Figure 4.2 is a list of input requirements that
F are necessary to make report updates. These are shown by the agency which
has primary staff responsibility for this data. The DA ACSAC Automated
Information Distribution Center will coordinate these inputs and transmit
them to the TRADOC computer. SIMO will then access them and transfer the
information to the appropriate data base.
29
-.-- -. -- ~ - - - - -
'" SYSTEM
1. ENTER UNIVAC SYSTEM YSNC IN LG-IN
-A
.. 2. CALL-UP THE SIMO 'SIMOLOGi-iREPORT ROUTINEj
3. I.D., REPORT NAME AND I.D. ANDITIME "AUTOM4ATICALLY REPORT NAME
PLACED IN LOG
4. REPORT PRINTED TO EXECUTECUSTOMER
5. I.D. AND TIME WRITTEN LOG-OUT
TO LOG
FIGURE 4-1 USER ACCESS AND LOGGING PROCEDURE
30
F OPERATINGi PROGRAMS TO
____ ____ ___ TOEi',"BOIP TRADOC
'-SIMO EQUIPMENT CMUE
SIGNAL CENTER C
PERSONNEL TANN
[THER DISTR__
fDA ACSAC
I DARCOM,(CORADCOM)
IIQ DELIVERY SCHEDULES
CURRENT ASSETSFEEDER DATA
COMPTROLLER DCSRDA DCSLOG
BUDGET (REAL) BUDGET (EST) EQUIP COST (REAL)
LC COSTS EQUIP COST (EST) CURRENT ISSUE
PRODUCTION SCHED
PRODUCTION RATESFYDP
AAO
IOCPOM/DAMPL
FIGURE 4-2 SIMO INPUT, OUTPUT DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
31
,a
5.0 ASMI PROGRAMS AND USERS REFERENCE HANDBOOK
This handbook is to be kept under separate cover and will provide SIMO
with a ready reference source for current information on programs, reports,
files and user requirements pertaining to the SIMO automated transition data
base and reporting system. Also included will be planning data on system
Sexpansion and updating. The reference material itself is primarily computer
generated and, as such, will be self-updating as changes in the system occur.
Conversely, user lists and their report requirements will be updated through
the staff action request procedure. Similarly, updates, projects, and system
refinements reference information will be available as a result of planning
conferences and meetings among management, operations and user personnel.
Shown below is the recommended index for the handbook with a summary of
each topic to be included. Experience and operational requirements may dictate
the inclusion of additional material as the system progresses, therefore the
sections have been left broad enough to accommodate this material.
SECTION I - PROGRAM LISTINGS
TAB A - SIMO MASTER PROGRAM LISTING - A mister index of all programs
used by AIIMS. Entitled as Program Documentation Record, this
index is kept current by AIIMS personnel using Proqram DOCP0002.
TAB B - SIMO MASTER FILE LISTING - A master index of files used by
AIIMS. This index is kept current by Program DOCP0003.
TAB C - USER PROGRAM LIST - An extract from the Master Program Listing
which shows only the output programs for user reports and
schedules. These program numbers will be the ones by which
users request information.
SECTION II - USER INFORMATION
TAB A - USER LIST - A listing of the users with organization. address,
office code, point-of-contact, telephone number and assigned I.D.
TAB B - USER/REPORT/DUE DATE MATRIX - The matrix will show user I.D.,
program number and date program required. Example follows:
3
32
PROGRAM
OFFICE AIIMSPOO06 AIIMSPOO03 AIIMSPO123
- " JAN JAN JANDA DCSOPS APR APR APR
JUN JUN JUN
AUG AUG AUG
JAN JAN JANAPR APR APR
DAJUN JUN JUN
AUG AUG AUG
SECTION III - PROGRAM STATUS/SCHEDULESTAB A - AIIMS SYSTEM UPDATES AND PROJECTS (PLANNED) - Description
of changes and refinements planned in the ADP system with
projected start and finish dates.
TAB B - NEW REPORTS AND USERS (PLANNED) - Planned output changes
ot new information to be generated along with potential
users.
TAB C - LOGS - Current copies of automated logs of user access.
SECTION IX - PROGRAM HEADERS - Banner sheets and samples of user
program runs.
r33
F."
K
33
•.- - - - , ~ - .
APPENDIX A
AIIMS REPORTS
FIGURE TITLE CLASS DESCRIPTION PROGRAM NR.
ACQUISITION/DISTRIBUTION
1 EQUIPMENT QUANTITIES CONF Equipment acquisition by AIIMSPOO06year showing budget, cost,cummulative totals andremaining AAO each year.
2 EQUIPMENT ACQUISITION UNCL Prints, as a check, the input AIIMSPOO26AAO INPUT AAO used in equipment quantity
program, AIIMSPOO06.
3 BUDGET/COST PRINT CONF Prints, as a check, the AIIMSPOO23input budget and unit costused in equipment quantityprogram, AIIMSPOO06.
4 LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT UNCL Each equipment planned buys AIIMSPOO38SHEET by FY, unit cost, AAO, 501,
components, milestones andmiscellaneous data.
5 EQUIPMENT QUANTITY BY CONF Summary of programmed AIIMSP0107YEAR (ANNLIST) annual equipment buys
by fiscal year.
6 EQUIPMENT COST/BUDGET CONE Summary of projected AIIMSP0118SUMMARY equipment buys by year
with cost/budget.
7 EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION CONF Equipment projected AIIMSP0123distribution to specificPOM units based onprojected annual buys.
8 EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION CONF Projected distribution AIIMSPOO09BY UNIT AND BUDGET YEAR of future equipment
acquisition to eachauthorized unit.
EQUI PMENTS/ASSEMBLAGES
9 EQUIPMENT MASTER FILE UNCL Master equipment file in key AIIMSPOO30PRINT order or alphabetically.
10 IOC PROFILE PRINT UNCL Prints equipment 1th AIIMSPOO37established IOC byascending FY.
.1 ASSEMBLAGE MASTER UNCL Master file of assemblages AIIMSPOO40GENERIC FILE and their components.
A-1
FIGURE TITLE CLASS DESCRIPTION PROGRAM NR.
12 MASTER EQUIPMENT UNCL Master file of procurement, AIIMSP0042
PACKAGES FILES GFE, end item and assemblage
packages.
13 END ITEM ASSOCIATED/ UNCL Related required items by AIIMSPOO80ANCILLARY EQUIPMENT Force F1-F5.
14 COMPONENT MASTER UNCL Master list of components AIIMSPOO83to assemblages.
15 EQUIPMENT MODEL FILES UNCL Prints equipment files Fl-F5 AIIMSPOO77by equipment category.
POM FORCE
16 CONDENSED FORCE FILE CONF POM Force by year with AIIMSPO007DAMPL sequence.
FORCE MODELS
17 EQUIPMENT FORCE MODEL UNCL Master list of equipment AIIMSP01MATCH showing force models and
each item that has a BOIavailable.
18 BOIP PRINT UNCL Extracts BOIP units and AIIMSPOO25equipment quantities from
master BOIP file in acondensed format.
19 GENERIC TOE UNCL Shows TOE's and authorized AIIMSPOO43equipment quantities by
force model.
20 GENERIC TOE FILE WITH UNCL Supplements AIIMSPOO43 to AIIMSPOO74
COMPONENT ITEMS add data base 'componentonly' items with zeroquantities within the force.
21 GENERIC BOI UNCL Equipment quantities and in AIIMSPO48which TOE's they are
. authorized by force model.
22 TOE FILE PRINT CONF TOE force models Fl-F5 by AIIMSPOO08active army, national guard,reserve and total force.
r4 23 TOE FILE WITH CONF Supplements AIIMSPOO08 to add AIIMSPOO73COMPONENT ITEMS data base 'component only'
items with zero quantitieswithin the force.
24 BOI FILE PRINT CONF BOI force models Fl-F5 by AIIMSPOO28active army, national guard,reserve and total force.
A-2
FIGURE TITLE CLASS _ PROGRAM NJR.
25 EQUIPMENT SUMMARY FILE CONF Force mQ431-F5 showing AIIMSPOO97
total eqP for activearmy, nat.31guard, reserveand t-otajof_.
26 ASSEMBLAGES BY FORCE CONF Assemblagegt-h components AIIMSPOO93
by force!4-kithin
equilnentIory.
27 COMPONENTS BY FORCE CONF Componentf obssemblages AIIMSPOO95by force 4I
A
4
'I A
ILI
- *
3K 0
00 •IQ•0••••• 00•
00 .1 0K. go . . . 00 ,
64
00409
0. I ••
:Li m "
30 M .:.
00I *I0 .
0@a ' A .
71 -M . " ft
00 I. %A:: : Li W "
:3 C, I 0"
cm c" .0 O
U.o
00 I•
6 IJ a 0IVI
,,, a 00
00 or 1 00 2- C3 .I-
-c a .- . - a- I"
a-a 0 A - I 1OW*00-W I-- -. M-3 L .
C,- w m •bwI
* g
00MALu 41 W es 2 0 0
.0 Z= dig = .Ad .
4.* A--- W % 1
9Z C3u -1 CZ00 a r .. u ., -. a a . 0
*o -z 4.La. • a . L
*0° :: • 2 . 2 0
00 ~a a a.Oa C 44 - a gme00 Lu L ..1 u4 V0
* ~~~~~FGR 1oa ~ aa -- w 0.V V o
a~ fmi IVfl e-Flo MN0OtW% W% .0
1 I *rI
10 -J 00 0A~ am00 -I .sf
i IM9OO00 knoom0C0 000 0 0Da0 f" c 0 o 00Vt a a PU O0tA' fu8. N00 a ' N r P. fm
CI C3 a a~~ a a u aQ000t naC0a0G I
a- a8 0 0 0 0 0 C00m ci OOO aC.0 . .. A 0 0.1. r P
die a I~ r--oL-I I Il C' 9 Co a : tI e
40aaac taQ000aa 4 FI! :- f tv
-3 6 - 10 9I e% a a4 b M M a A IC b4 n C I l C n P n m !C.W @ a cla 0 C 0 0m0 aa 3a &m .
00A
4% f" 0 -f kl w t k a P W . t o 0 MG% a-&m 04 4I, ao Md.d 0Sd c% 00b asa0 00 40 00 00Q ots OUO
acC3
1A
ILLUSTRATION NOT AVAILABLE
TO BE FURNISHED
6 FIGURE 2
.0 Cpl. 'I &A 1000 * I *
i . i&Z fAd.r C20 600 0 & A Q m o P.OiAa 00 0
a N MW%4m. % - 0 c a a a
= 0 a4 n*. . .
ms. . .. , 0. a.-~
* -A O o o o o
- 11 44 4 443 . a . . 4% SC3 a) a 42* C3 @ . B . e24 1 4u% - c m KF ar 'Iij.0P Scc =tn0: *1. M: P ne lO O OC.a .
- l I tA & P E A . 7 Lol a F rIl I po a a &a 02 Q,
00 %d ) 1 oG o 0 k0as oC lcg
~..~o0a.-40 C~oooaoo0 0 0 c 00VrO ^4 Al E~ft %4A AI~'a
cc. , c mmp v-
.0 V C, 00 =000 Cla a a (". o .0 ev Cy'0 qu.. .c, %rp
r- iD, .. ~ LM r 0O o 0 N~ 00 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 C3~ 0. 0 0 Io M..N- 0 l 0 E4 OP A I.4
A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -0 C3 0 in 0 a. w% tn eA m, t- 0 54 SIA* 5I*A* 0 C> *l C 5 0 4 gi
17.o o oo oa o .. ' 0INfim :IrU 0P % -
pi1 m f.4v. J %1 4 .* 0 C1 00- 47 NC-4 0 P o 09 g oc oc-O l c - CO o - do G. go am a00 12 a-Q . - .
46
.
40 ap I 00 a0
10- MAI
0o co C 00 0 00000 =00 10~c~c cca a
I0 0
coot a0 00c4o o-o cla4 0
M A 40h
rq ae -9f" OO0-tOO10ob00
9- 000 OjO wt 0N OOO OOOMO WO 6n 0eq 4p. a I a 0 0 C0 010 0.0 010 0 0 0! "NNNNN ~
u 0. .0 0m 0 ft N .0 fm 'T fNm a N
in r- Iat 0 . iu 0c. 0 MA I.J QC
z !
p4 ?WL. Q,4 OA IN 1 0 00CI. o0 0 0 00 U.*~~~ CD10 a! 0! 01 . 0 O 0O O O
0A 0
* 0004
-3 o1% O IA 0I 0
%a 0 ~ * 0 * *':00 00 0 0
do IAICCA0 o oo o o o
Z Lv 0~ 0 0; 00 00 0 0 CIO 0 0 0 0 0D 0 00 0 %l
0. 00 e - i1i MA CU-Q-*~~~ C 4 SCN
ala
z ID
ccA
000 0 I 0 0100 000.3
0~~~~- . 4Aa ~-~-
as #Ma
apa
0- if onm p. cmd m447 W a- a t- in.
o0 40 C3 CD1 0C 0C C* uo Q -A C4 U% G) . S . % 0 A* -C i f0a
4 a ME in 9 --- =40 Inom M W% C2 iVA Al a 4 0 .
sI I3 dwt 1110 l- a 0 I0C, k
10 aat I * * f t
ex. 13 4 00C ; C lcl0 c 3 o C3 =1 40 4i.1 l3 0C14 l03.000 cm~m & ul 30k ,U )1 D 4 0 4 C C,= C 0 C3 0c~ %9 0%e 8P CDA .. nI* qOO OO o O p 10 Np. 40a*l,% f
NJ ~fla.. CDLk o.a@ O4n0o oaoO~
* - .* . II~V .i 5 2
31- '90 Q 1 0 ICS. CE 0 *a4"s. , b- f"* %A S ob 0; : e. C2 * 0000 0 o 0 0 .N~, p
:=b owj wo p. CD ft - w*. I ,V 4 - -0 c* A
a i 000 0, , 0 0 0 ' a 0 0A 0 00 0
0 L-*. 4 0 ** t
L I .. . ......... .
-r I-
P- 06 10 x r- c f4- 104 at0 P. L40* ~ ~ ~ r .4m I C ~0i 0 sw C 0 a a a*
c. a a m 0 a 0.4 Q 00 a~b C.04a 3
aqp0. c . WI. p Ia 0 0
W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 %0m0 4-0 o 4 O ra 0 00 c .f" 4v 40 0 0 00 0ca 4zALI66 W. !I @00 C3 00 doo b 0 0 D04 % as *0 * *
4 0 Ow~- P- 0C *4--- 0 . =0 000 o -14 9P. e0 00. r; %mm I"0 a 00 0 0 o3. 9 0 4'. ra f" ~ do~ wC 4wC C I Aft *C C0 0 0 00 1;C; CM. - JA 4 f C
0-0IAr 7 0-s 00 a C a0 0 W% Coo *0 av 00* a a& 00 0.0 00 0.0A. ,-.. .4.4 09 em. N inCC 0-00%.0 a COO.4~~ - . 4 . 94 6 .4 41-... .
006 .j.9 44 00 0040 0- 00 000 00 a0000.0~~~~0 000.m ' a 361#4 W 00 $A 0 00S a9 C. *& C. 40 a.0 4 1 0 0 & il F W00 009
a Q a40. ccC -m 00 ftb.40 000bgoft 0000 c
iii Wii Ua% 0 in0 = 0 o' 400 4 4 00 Cc= 00 gooa min 09 .4. 00 000 CC MN 00o 0000 0 000 C .0. Cu-C e6C 00 c0o 00 Coow -w 4 in... Q.j aC 4k 40-- :. 7-094 =00 000.0~~ 10 9a ao La 00 a a a..0 9.,a0 0-Oc 0 4 P- 4;N-CO4; doCC.. O.0 "Ca0C fn 0000%f &6 0 -
a a 0. C0OOco m mw ~ 00 -c 00 000 o oa 9 ..00 000 eQ CC * 0 a0 00 0 00004 0 0. a 0040 CC -r C 00 0 0 C 00o0 0 W%00 ad. 00 in 043 000m 00 0 0 C) Op i.. 30 MD ~0 D ~ a ft4 ccu C C ~ P.00 O J c o o00a
C; 0. .O:. 4; 4w 4; .4 j- e.: 04
ru~~0 000"Qin 4 0 0 a0 0
- 0.0 'Coo cc 0a 00 CC a C 00 a 0040 00 c aoK .07 CivC~- 000 CooC a* 00 C 0040 00 000lQ0 0.4 0040.. a4 .0 e e c0 04 0 0000e .a a. a o ae C2, 00 a a 0ala 00 00C
0 0 coo c 00 c a* aC 0 m 00a 00 000a sn. aw oa r 00 Coo me em co * 00 00 0 00 or c =.a OS o ~ 000 . .* Co "00pa0 00 0a00I. .4.7 coo0' a Q C ee c o c .4.4 . O i0 0 0
at au 0 6 0.4 &';
00- 0C 00 w4~
04 " 00 O3
ccN Oc0. 0 a 000 00000 . 00 00a4r cc -0000 000 Oa 00D 00 00 a* 0 o Ia tm 00 000 oa Owoo 00 0oo Qc00.0 00000 co-4
ry 1 0 . 0 4 a 00 a Cao Co C 0.4Qc 000 00 0D'--0T co oa- c 1Oc; C; 0 00 C; 0 0 00 C;c
ex N .V. a~ 0; *0a a.. a. C; * 1;9
3 0 0 0 0 40 00. a r.OiO 0000 0 .44.0 0a000j 4 0 0040
'.i o- 0 44 4)-.7 ~ .4 .
4~~~Z at C- C- C-e a-.- ~ - 0 W
Q 4 W CS d%0 hi 0w %J as W - 0c do t0dLA. aK 7- 94 - ail ~ ~C a - Ol0 a
* S S 5 5 S I* S 1 . 1I I M.MLf.
Ap.
*45I* .. I . '. 2
-6 all:..2Ii dof S 0
IV*
'I I" C300co=0C D00C .00000QC l000a
A4 . A mr-mAaz . 0 % . na.6AA4nci , 0a. % .
M% &A* uI %b %w %w% L AL ^6'.0U -F -P A L Av
2. zp ras -d -- I rd-Q
s~ c* I.' voo 3rI I'I- f 24 1.1. . L4LiL U%t *r LAIl I-IsW4 LALjLj L uu
C3 2eI -W4- C- d 9 4- 9- 9- C-4- 9- JA- 4 C c4-9 . A-44 ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ 6- Iu .5,L JU .4JL C jw4 ~ ju L jLAu L ju j ~ uWLju jW, A# At' rr , eI ,r v eter ore' e& ... .eewnea -1-12% r* w f rwww 6w r-
11 10 0 n. A f NAb %MW A1 l:ii ILl
r% I-V r ~ r ~ ~ ,
b.I
- a a
* Ia .
1w 3r Lqi L f lp fa e .
.
ga *0 w
*0 A&I , 300 0
*0 %AI
or -0 w-
q*0 w *D caIb -
2-- 000 IWO .1
2. Cy I 2
00 000
go w o A* 0 w. 3- w
a' 00 - aI
00 FIGURE
0 0.. ....
0 AL 0 ob0 1Laa. .0 0* 0 a .a
J_ 0 42 4
* 00* 0
I_ AL :40 't 04 '
3e C5 C5 ca. 3 41 .0 at a'l lo ~ ~
ze As
1~~~~M -. -gfd04 4t MA4 4 43 =51 .4
-A .4 P- 41 & , .a
4I 40 ft W! - ! f . ,JAM me u* u.t I
- e b. if 0-w do*~- V. -M . .. ~~! ~ ~ .
ca V- 6- 3c .3 ZC 1zr W ~b4J~* ~ Wdo.*e3 *z AS L AO0O4~ a -
w It W Wof 40 . -a.~~f 0% 4
11 1 a- 4.44J~ - - - - . 60In C3 n n Co Ir * cs
p. .b..0UP 9b ~ au Z W
.93
AM'i
011i 114
4% 4n 0 iP.- .0 .42~
cio -.
.Al
CA 2 rip OO OC O OOm. O gin Ne% 0. . Mes
a' A ,a I A.0i Mi -'A IJ
ut In 4.J .
at b. 34 W, at . 6A N a
.4 1 U
SP 0- w ef at .. u Al ai .j .I -A 2
-~ me Unde - -. j D.- w LU ~I.. P
T% ae.a~~ L6 I. c.e
.4 N~N~- M U 4Ad.J 46- de so ~ ~ ~ l. -r9 9 4 IV 3t 'o.
* - L A P9A~ J M L & L i~ 4" .r" 19 . Lff SM 4% N . . .c w .eOLJW LA W w 0 L d
Z at P. P- .n uJ . -I-OZ.3 -w imI p .Jt 20 44 P9t 2A- i w9 w Loj~J~~ 9J plJ P9' P9 "" I ~.
Lb %f r9w~ A r. g . - ^ *-t3p tm oN Li ui 0= .9 0m-S ,c ,- = s =
Mi bi SM Li LI- L- Ur 'A %A w M-iun v-ne h
"P at '! .. !: '-3 -. -. n SM.W1M W , 3 2
* L I I L
o on
f" 1: .% .r . I ,r
- P9 NUN N
0 at 2 cc
4% I I 751P
3op M Mf-
W b . o a- ' 1- 0 C% s U, 0
"0 d 4 .6 ii . 0w i W o f g . -Cd.
* * ~ L C G 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 ( , (
I" x0C o a
* CC~ I I -, -.. ~ e2 .
' K 14 D- a.c
InC
41 o
c ccj
II
66 .6 j; 4 0 a cop
ccC C~ aa -
a.
a , -3 . 2~ A A 8 . N..8. . P 00 Od~ .8C P t. I AA l t P t 8.8..A ft 1 8 4N d.A.Cv 1. 0~ e ee % .n ~ n 's ac e a a ec a ea% aS n s % aS"
4w aft ;P4 M cr. TJMNIIIN
c: a r4 - D-z..4 v .. .1C6-.
.9~~L j I4
.8 d - - "- 'm.1
a ~ ... 0 et.U-c Z8 ei nV n2j m 2, 2 s:: .0' I c r,2 -- z-~x 73. I 8 - A of.N
ct . - wI ., 0 - o0
I I j
I-IM ~ . V. L. ,.- Q LA ' r iw- ..w _ niI .3
at .d c =Q ao~ Imo5ALA~
a 3ca lff ~ 9A %t- r 8 l~* 1 i -L~J~la ~ .tn . ~ L
r, IDr .. J JJ t~ r 1L.,~s .V J c % ~ rW L~Ah blC V - S...t.JLA..6O.L ~ C c x~
I~~~~~~~~ A, - ~ l A ~ ~ V S . L a L L ~ l etr
z 'I Z..4% T8 .P s1 ]
-1 - - - - - 1L
ner,...FIGURE 9Al~ f . . O N A C
a a a a a a a a a a a 0 ~ a* 0! 6! a a a 0 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 0
fw..
. .. as a a . a . g .e aa. ea 0 a ac a a.se a a.. e a
1 6 sac a 1alga so &ea st 0 00 06 00 a & *-a. a s a a.... do$a *O4;,sIo40 NIC3CO-0
'B a 5 55 0 a cl a a a a a a a a a a ac a 6. 60a s * a e a aaaa55 555550qI i F :"w vu I i I
- a e, s : a a a ca a~ 0 a a ace a 0 as a a ese a a a as . a sea a a-
a ssS4 0 0i **g *a 5fo o o 0 5 O5 b 5 6- 6 4 0 0 a 9 6 a 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 5
Al I
Ca c55 ass 41 e se cc a ea e ease ee 0a 6a906 0ss e0~ as as e sasa
ml -
PC t W
It P- C'
IAI IAL U , . iL
W, M I ' J 0 ;r
IV I' C:r% U. e-' I he nete ie , I %cine ' if i ,d n ncr%
4L. N4 -4 - . Z Ua .9- 44- 4. 4 . 4 :8Sc. r 9w - 9w ww- W . W.0- 0- W a. 9 f 6I 0
-*Am
C C C3 cl o j C- a
0* - w % -C -- -~4 4 i4~d -4- 0 - -
U 1. 24 X~.11J
M. I .' -,
ad :3 -64 f : t W 4c
.3 . - 1'.4- -.1Z - ZW - C. cIJ w W~ -A
z
3r a -I r
ADdow 0. Pl= r.i .0 -J J !4 01T,fm.7 0 I I 4 x& J 7. .. C'f~ .t.1 7C
x4- 00 ad~0 I~, IC00 co c r w xg I 1 -4 D 0 1 -C
0, 44 ft aw 0. 04- F4 44 44 44 4 4 CP.4 40 ft P.4 .0 444 44 443 .aI C3'c0 on 4 ft
In- 4 m. m c o 0 n 0an O a a o n o o o n
0-4
z
- - -9
a '5 . .. . 1 9 1
- jaj11A
a 4K 3 1GI. .....
a. xj -WI t 6
CA D wJ. '1 .4 c ~a~ a
F~~~~~.~~ W~L4. 4 .. U 4 Ii U .Cf * i at a o.,a. . .J ~ a. D . .Ia= Q~~~ S.7* 3. .a 0 p. c OC..
at -f.C I xI z M *.0 4 Am0dV I a I I
IL
41 -
* Is~~~~~~~~~. maco , ~ e eo , a o o e O ~ - e~~44 4444 .~44 44 4~ 44 ~ 444 44 ~~ a
m 4 ti 1 4 1,4 1 1 , o t a
Is. rv 01 . 0 1
CID I. lm I I -o na -.9 -9 .. -
49
w Jr
W. Iii
IC)-
e% I
'c e c c c ce e c. c o c : *
Cie C6
0 Iz43C - d A I -- Zb CL P- SL ri 3 - . L31,0 C, Ij I C0 3.DP3
60U Ix j ;1 c X C: c .60 0-J AJ~ Lit ca 0~b cc "i WI ca I -Wa
10 0-LU Z t C U, A. -- ofz a c -. Ia
C3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .%A meO 0j - - j" h j- WW e IC. _ c- a. c _jA a
14:6-J u 4 aOr - 3 c 00,Il L LtJ&A 2 3-1 3 1 n 0 Q UJ 0. j 3
w U-Xa Uh ; O = u J 4 6 LLO L J UJ I 0U j ~ LU -a4JLLU LJL% JIww c xU DIc.-C le I- . D =C3 aI. .J L jCe2C C r l cA J aD0 C
I. Nol in' cc31 2 t> 0 u UJI. A DW -- LIuj u LD 0 L . kn 0 tj :I j-jz wi J~I gL 0 - J I- Z.z = X j C iU'a UX9,-IX
j .C .. I- < LJ0 -1 1. . w - M 4 0 - . ; q . .
IJ eg
0 O--C OT 1 N.4-4.-= CPa 0- OC 44J .4.0Cf F -f:C - .m rco D I I Icoccco I I I c Ia I c I IC 1. a., 1 1C. U.I I cl% I *.
I 1. L2 0k- ~ >- I- L v 1 1-%2Z--, 0 31- %3
L&J =1 U,% 000 C 0 - 4.-- q OY"N^jN em mU0 0494.. -1 er e rvNIN In A 0 0---4 em
9 at 49C 4 - 4 4 4 .4 -CwsN 4 a -d -r 4.4 4 444 44 444 qxO 4-r t- 4 a- 4- 4
Ii L * i
Lu 66 ~ J
zi :us i
L" Ila seIi
u c c At
04 w IgL3y 0
%b 4 4 4I II~I
4u I'M 3C a I 3
92 0- I-
C,1.00
En0)
0~~ 0000
0 1 0 00 -
/e-w r- 0n r V
0 0 0 t-4(/
(n'i 0 0 0 Z
C:..% C'4 .4O
0
c~ ~ ~ E E-4 .0 ~ 8 0
2:. E-4E EIIIw ~z E-
w 0
sic Q- wIn CQ w E-4- o
E-i u ) U
4.. .3 f- FIGCID a 13
-I iitw-- 1-o W--
ILI
I~ ~ ~~Z A ~~,-
1..,1 'r-i-
43cm % s 'JL %J ,p1 1 - 3Jb Z;S --f.tfJla JJ -9 - C hJ I5 A 0
4L lwv -- .. , I ~..*~ .&a.. - .li v h0 J
Wd 2p-1 4L
.A .. .j.1. r. ,- .3 . C3 Co
W "2. !;'.-a rl -Z-2 mC 2C -- 1
K9 - -9 4.j .-9 a' w 4K .. 30i 4 . -I dV
god
I It=
m nel^I el0 .4 Al I I
CL .
7K' vT-- Ir r0 1 .4
5. 5 0.- .41 w n eaIl. . m 9*~%9OP.2 I I V S~IS*. ~ * A ~ l ,,n.2' , A .lAI ' *' n.I' A
-. v Ir 9 1111 9199994 99 11s919 999 111111-
W t~ 19 191 19 19~#. 1.199 t 19P 919 19~ %19 91991 119 919 919 19tell '- ' ~ a'~ '''''' a'aaa '' '~' a d ''' s
a. a a'aa' ~ a'a''a''a'aa' d g..a~a't aa' Itd
L ii
M61 do. Ii '
FIGURE 1
a At
*0~ w- .
I* 0C3 ..7p
.me e% w
OO E*I C3 0
o 0 Li A, zmI CD C id W
d --9 .at m 0
go ,* 1.. c
x -o- 3r go
W, 7' - 3- Ll. *
00 ,f' aeJ Nrci U - I 0 I- LL ewal'. I :: r
4,, IA - 4OC ~ ~ ~ a - - 40r~% 0
Oa ~ 2 1-- - L.*~* U %
OC' -r- .~. b.- I. -
* 0 3r~** ~ . ef 6. UA- ~ I 0
EC& .. : -i e,% LA -, L.46 &u -W " u ;A 0I
00 -W VMU ,t -2 Vi I 4.0 V% w w44 C 00
e ~ ~~~ -*
L 2 mb A
e, 0
* ~ ~ ~ V *0 A &-: J - U ~to # W- 0
ca .u ~ -C. C
dm - 0 I 4
~6,6
I~ 4- f '
LeI f 1 I pd. INov A 0 l 0~ tA 1q 64 I~p 1A Gn6U .-
-w 41,4 co-'Dc pc Or-G : l",fo4 r -f -r o W
;U 0, g tri a 0 141 yo0 t4 NOO i0 inO U% tn An a 0 0t- &A to N4r 00
le 42 p-~b ey~0 10f mZ.TrI-' rao .0%- 2Ctr 0 0 0 -~io 0 'coOp 0~ 0 A&
0 m o m ininIn t0 ry 0 N tNCrlo tf - V 1 . % w
I ' 0' I CD
ILA %+ Id
m ai do .4
!.bI ji '- i+I M Ift0'oO. RU -c of _0 )-ap nt i0
PQ pd F4L.. 2Ep*14Oiio 1181I -1W0460o~ :Ci C)ap Ct .I UftJiJU
09 LU.~a i
IA IWin I 4 ILA u
I.Ja. U U It.L 0. p.- ?1)I i I IT '3c~ 1616. U. ds 1A1 P
ALAm !j c m :. Xa-Ubb I- e
ku ;: UJ 11iij j'1 jo
On j Mr
j4 6m >1)u j A t -,s L.m AL4 :I
X-' oI3C t d 4 a t 5 O- A 4 A -A A7
X 0 4 P. .z s oI .6 1 C I - 4 l X M a w 9 - M 0 m m 0 0 m. . P , P 1 2 M c e' A b - A L A -LA W -A L3 lA -C l S W w I eL L' L -31 .9 -9 -4 1 ,I LC .C
I . mt a st j- % Isr nrlr W f K A I .i f-w10wr
me 7! uxi~ ub ~ . DL .jL i f i iP, L SLiiAI L..L U ,JLJ0- on I22 ,mC 3Mt ' .P M Z - 2' F '? p V !Z:
W Z WL J& 6 -I- L - O4 =9 04 0C.C M 09 =C =C G9 0C cC
^ 0 , ~ P- m. . l -- -; % r. 0 -1-'a.1% %,; -, r.. --.-- -=- :. .
z. I ccc0::m a yf v1 r 4vri C-M.F d
- -a - --- - -~ - -
- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ - -A -- -- - - - -- ------ ----
- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
CL~ft ft -y ev .4 f' fy N.i N N: e% N.J '% m LX0 00000 ~0~
Aft . . - -
.04i Ii Iill r ~ IIIr
Ii * i
45 1&
& I Lo
iI f I . -.Il~~~~~~~~~~~~~a~~~~~ r a.~0 - a . 0 0 - C O 0 .C .0 O -.-- 4. 0 0 0 .- 0 a 0 0
L~~~~~~~~~.A~~~~~~~ .U% n-I A I I I9A% A . ~ ~ ~ U% guI I U AIIUIhIlbat Cb lb le' lbl bl bbll bll bl bll bl bl b ll bbl L
tI *'.a 2enW 0m :aj %C lmlA *j U.. lbl%
0 a If~ * I -. f w -WA l.d -M W .J3r- - Ad
*% I ,l". 2 M. ,C II bL:: - = a, ::
A~ 4 1 :VI W - t A 0- I 11% -.I t.N 41** n C
l0 Q4 es4OI-loc no ,^ oc -" I m0 .=- 5 c ' ; C .
CC - ; ,CC ,C) 1C C 1C Cj II 41, a 1 1.wnCoa C' , 3aW f-a -40 4 di W 9 -4-
FIUR 17
'4
IIr-
CD 400.
p . W C I r 1m %. D
C, a C3 Q ft S i I '
* ~ma
* I. aba .
cC 1
AS W 1:ft4
00 .- . -@
00 *0
* -. v*w@Z
*S I -A 00,0
40 *0 4
W 4000 F up w e*0 U . w AL .;, A.l
00 .. t 0@I*00 0,
@ .r In I I
008 4a 4* ~~ ~ As 4 0
a. mem CD di
4Oh04 A -i
*l 0"0 w 0 m 0 0
. M . a aCI
z P 0 0 0 *
4 a 04
FIUE1
rr
0 al
.4. * 9D .
do4 t .4 4 .4. all4
-d 2. & z' lyI I ! ' dIP - P - II
I"- J
C, d - 4. 4- wx IWw 3
=4 a .a ta :1. -. e, - .s .
- , X rr r r M Ls
A .- SMae-tC 0C3.JaL' ut -j 404 w4.~ acJ .- u9SIC9-j %.;J ' 0- 9-uj WLJ.4 CoN19
~W a0..Ja wa , nM1~U 'n49-9 U2JI - l9Z. i 1 2 2 =140 ~ ~ ~ ss0 02 - I11w l M. - IL Alt
W16 .01 a.^5 ago co 0-aaI hat a K aac0 w a me S 0
.42.
-~~~. j 1 1
a9% .1 -
t : a I1 .1 .00m C l w a
,A wwla me 4 t eW a 4W%~~~~~5 I-wmwg N. 23
LJ~iLA~& n 0- ZN
a=1 .3 0 ft 11.. M.04.- ~ -999 (444
17 C, ~ 9 -~9 - -9 h.*
. 2r
Cra 7
Wbb
~ N..mc4A*W~ja NO 019.f49-.A.* a 1 0 ~ .l.a d' a' '.4 -, 00 U' a 0.0. . N .91.J aa' ' ~- -~ 19.w .19-aA 0dig0
- - 0 00 - 9 00 4'9- 0 o c 0~- - --- - .or
:2 w
-L IF.
41 *I I
FIUR 19A . a
- C2
00 Ge
_j C3
U0 O0
Gwl a0W u. G
00 4 3
ca SM CAO 4 I 0e
Ge .4 Ooc4
'. *. .
k* .4 b-
wo SM a 0 o C'
- - --- - - - - - - -
SAME FORMAT AS FIGURE 19A BUT WITH 'COMPONENT ONLY' ITEMS AT END OF RUN.
FIGURE 20A
w
0 *****ease
4"
2e
:42.u
it-r
d1P.
of0 10,
0 A C
4.1
00 4
do a ci- .11 1.L
00 -A I f-C
C,2.Q -W --
o- "A bu 4.
*~~~ .2 W U0
koZ. za -VZ
55 " , I" .0- t M. C
1- :0Se * C- *4~ 4
A. -- URE 21
fu fy No ft! * * ft OW ft ftaio*. w
00 se .1 ? , L I ; H I .
4.~4. LA*I~~2 1 . I I
U~9 -A 4u4 p- ozf~ of%~ 2e
Li w. -4 3r IA 6- 4A ff 0
LL, LA 2E I^ IA U% W( *tt af M i^fnZ n 4 . vc Lgjo n-j LA wt I j kAIt L - A W#L oa
zI me. 1v wwdnsn~ ~ M do as an a. n em
a&m ~L W Wo i LA0-- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ b U4 z i 4 4 A-U &o -~ U .~ W
M0 Ei IL- AL A .J iJh
L. u nU % ^W %W r. U%40 % ft0 Z.4U0 PZ Lns3 a a -~a .. Jtu - a V :. &A A
a U J* .0 . C M0IM I- C. aCC ) .090C2 : m
Lu au _jLA u
.ee.*...*.o..** .@*e*.4~e . @ * e~ * O O e* SM**E O~~O O*@ ** * *** ** O* b o.. *..o ....f3
LA ~ aOG~.bM b*4 8S * *** *** ** 8000 080 0880060
j L
LA U C
0w r b- G
As As.d
LA -A . A
ow kwW I. A2 1M A 1
in LIL W* ~ -' .5%4M
0 0 .
00 00
0 %L in0
0 a 00J aju k
0 Li me3
00 "Ja 00 ".n e .
-. 00 w
Oo 0 a., 4. mi 3
0 ccU C's4f
00 0-'6 3 W 00.00 ~- .Ao .0 r r a .-
0 0 -r .1 -M -l
0 A T.- "I Co .j J e
in 0 0 .0* ts ~ a .7 - r_ jr yay.Ju
a p -w e.9 d 00
0 00 06c 4 4a 0-000dl
00j 2p n a00x ccP
-0 -t0 V ~ r-
* 00 .- P 040 *.l .1 00r
a0 ZI aa
00 -M .0 F*fjt goa 0 y
"0 6 0 A00 ~a- OJ~ 0 Z-~*W0
* ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ FGR 22 ... .b-~
0'
C 7'4, IIi- - 4 I
* . I II
01f r I 4.t ad I
o- CIOA LA ft
LD 0 iw "I CI if:...iI.U;I.- -jw II c
WS- I-& m Li j ccI-I-I J -
S-C - % C L L l wCt o wI .4 = a- wi4I
.1 w a .' - , 0- 6 Li40 &M cc * AL -"
A.# ~ I-~ w - - 9 w Li : a m 0 -m w~ $. O A w $-- w ""ww $- 0 0. l j 4~ -j w O w4
wi c v c - I.. 6n=e. = " -SO ." = 0-: *0c CQ .c.
hn g m g eP -i 4MJ0 www .- w e 0 Wu oZ - " - ::0 LW D o.. i m2 Aw 3 %2 mt i0 m% MA u4 . 1-. 4-6 1.- -1.- . -a
1 0 =WW 0. 0. 4 L"4' 6-~ 0 p- beLi^m aczmI.- a wZ . a a I~4 .d- 9 - 1- 4
e4M 0 -ar ff L9 0- 1, == I f D I m. 0 I40 1 "0 go &f9OL 1.r d uj p.J 131 11*aIu II : au C u u4. I .- 0.i 3-C.J &L1U
- C U ^% 1 .0 P4-LuP- mm r ar u9-~ L, 0 r 1~ M r .C 4 1% L . 4.0Ocs 0 ,.uIm9-
-9 .19 Iii .9 .1 .4 wU -a -C -*~~~~. 4 -4 -C C 1 - -4
WA. *I I
p- I U
%. = ~N . 0 4
i . P
* C5 44b o -~ -ma ~ ~nOMA o ou0 o o ~ -O ~ ~ o o o o ~
C ve
3p. * I FP n I
~~~~ 7 .~ I~
9L -C I.- Ii ! .1 I
at
le a4/1
asa
0 400 C) on M% .44 ~ .4 we-" V .- Cf 0.4.4A ft ft w.4 ft bi .u0 vmf
=an.
W= V4 =I =-. $ 1'e
Cal- ltJ goI -APt I-'o _d
Li 0i LiA C6 Li~ le Cie4U0 02 i .4
-A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a s me~d& "i I- =A tI- a.gek -C e u L.0 . 4 0a-~ c a aPC2 ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w "i LA w AX - L . i 4 . c4 - ..j Uj 0 W - i #10 i Li P- 0. w .0 ..~ "a
m~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 0 z I= oujo :U UF 8. Z1 e = 0.. 0, P- %M = - C , : 2 c@-6t
s A L 2 C2 i eam w J "11 1 "Ir . 3C We o-JU 21 u~II~a J i. UA -j&#-0C -4 Li 0- - . U I.- t0 "14. 45 44 - A 4.WW4wn C0 CQ 0Z .A
4A W-w wb- C e: .o w m 00 00 w - =-W--- a., 000 UA 0
93
p es in -F @a wCD
w f 0 1 . Io ft- 4 %t qaa - 0w p ).L,.* * ca A gm cc aac n3. 2-2--C- - cV
3c I1 3dP b- -11 - .a 4h e -t29
- 4 ..0 QI. -0 y a " m. Am47 C Om C) I3 C C Cu 2 C* m CS C l31 60 o C, o C, 0 CC ;99C>aC '0C lC , C P
r -a W I4 - 9.9. 9. 4- 9" 9. C. 4. f - 4- C. C-- 9.
_c I IAf
-3, $.-Iw
SAME FORMAT AS FIGURE 22A BUT WITH 'COMPONENT ONLY' ITEMS AT END OF RUN.
ILI
FIGURE 23
0 z0
@0 . *
@0 00 r
4 0 Tu41.
0b0 m 0 0
400
4. f.
41 4.j 49 of BJ
00 0
a00 0 0
oa 4. m U44l -
a0 A0 j I W. a
A. .J %4 ; - LL uw .
eo .
00 *.-a~
ve LA 3. 01
W. -w r,40j.I ,
-I, ILI0 4
00 r ev 040 h.. 0a
a - aaaOeaaa000 44 6 01
f. FiR 24
•oI * ' I q 4 , , * q * a
Ca S
61' *- - - ...
a
°0 1 i I :!'' U
":" l !i ! ll iIiia- " .............. . ..fu , . i
, ,l . I : ;, - ! ,r! ~1
* i r I
t I I !iIf "H!
i o * & ,..:,, i IH . -_ .1 . -ii i . _
""f' i . I L i i : .' .' I. I I ' i
.8 O I0 loI l 0 i. j~l II t Oi I
-i 4A # t w 04o 1- v ft
inl* * I i * f j j ' i,lid 6 .1 I
, . |Lto I6 ir : 1 .6 ! , Cc
"W Z Zl&J dI
ut 44 40 LaC AU -j . 9&~.r3 kw I LI*Lme* b-
& -- L-. a '43 - II a- ! L ;1
cc 6 * w ad 2. . ! ' , # , a 'i
I^ LO r . j L, .j 0. gL ,L o ..
I , " I i *. , , -l, ,*"Z I * - ' ;
VI ~ ~ %A onL *A sAWV A- 8 fMW W - 4UC 561% . n ia.A Or*
2p L% Lb * e CsL wabL L aLL1L 4 nd
*r I? = -A a^rhA
lad * 1^ eh 0% Kef C2 C3 DC3-
001 pq vI i %W D a 0.A AA A A nA
C *- c - q * -61 61- a off
I 4 61
* ~ - 'a B
W * * 61 ow
*r M
.. ... . .. .
40
0. k. tKof Z
U. I.Jr
6- r. u0
7.7 1- "
W 00 3r IA kAa@0 00 u
*. M M a2 -" 1 &
.a 04 'P A j u
#a c aaw e -
0 4 of M 9 1, b
aa 00 *
* 0 r i a A a
00 .. j a uwS al 2c 9 9 61aiw
0e a.a
*OI I#AIc
laiN
• 'I f,+"111
,-' = + I ! I0 ..
; I -I.j' ,________ #
11.
o . I+ +* + *+ I,;+ I + I .,
" ..- mm
. I I - "," 1+ ,. -, +-'5 a_
i,-,e
C2 .& c
hu At + i i ! i
I I, I .,,,. + ,, : :+A I me x & -me
JO' i. * i1 W I.- -M :pa : L L-j w c. m = I K I.I 2 w 6- w
.,. .. ,.... y
ag a _ ' ft. I- -
".-I P- " ;: I A0-o-L c0,A0 6 . .auI*u i r" j-" W - W %&w ld w. a-._ w .e Uw L 21 w %.2a 1- -A . . :M . 6M".A.MSO - fML5C!0 .LA
UCs 9K WhJ =- a-%M mw ,l -1- L a T) W W -- = - 0*0~d.- ca M O j-% n. =T w&, c ee L. A-2E m 106 W. La A.Mmu *j C w 7 1 C- -
C3 z' 0- .1A.& .1P rL .=w == 3W==: rA eId. 'r.. 'n a- So 2- 460 9- A.46&M
= v m c mm n o .J Cl-A 4 A W UhA tJ - u j iAi Sn-1 u u :1bA w ".I.' x~ - A-- j b. - m n S-j _ . j c r ec cc 3iia wa7. C gh 0IJ . L~ m- .L IL U. 2-"A
t* f- r . .W wW 0 AW% UA f L - t l o 44. -6 .9.a45 LC. t i %9
UA *2e- Z as u e .Li 66
* Ca.9
I" -0 4" mM wm uM D.4i n a. 0 W Aut- r0neat 0 "i wa- p g mI 4:,- nA AU 1%Af o li A% o a
a' -s a a' a .& id I ..l - 1 0
p- .1 -11 .0- .01 f, 4 0 a 1 6A . 0 .b
* at IM0
ga -S#.e A 6 47
ow M M.I L),Z4 -Ac-, % 1 o z j j- -
1- 10. n el 'A. CI C)C.C 'h ,C >91C)C a )' . IC ' 9,41 0 C - i lC
-d a - 4 M 9-.4 6. .. . *0 w as- 9 F. 9. C c. 4- 9d f- 9. 9. 1- I4W d~ .0 0f .0 W .0 dW 'f .0. 0. WW- 4. W. 9- 0Wd 6W. 4 0 . W
a. t.
*0 a Q.
*~t L.4.
*u. el *
*0 ,r aj4
ata
0* a. 244aa4 ce o 4
1. %A
.0 0 0 %L
k" E, a "a4
0v ft c
!r Z.~ 4.3
00 a M A *0-0 0 .j w4 .J a n
0V -r 4
w0 % 0 :3 "1
40 Wugj F,0V
0 & eeL ki- -W of0 4j v *- 0WM I
cc 'r ILL w i e0 La, 3- %A 61 W w
L3 M C3 tew-C3' 00 0 - v..0
0 a *
* 0 7, A - wa I I I o00 *u MA 004 - *. . I P) 4
to .) V .T -~ 1....J ^0P 'AP- A*~ ~ t4 Ls -4 0
U0 W C~~v t- .4 Z0 a)oL.-ttua. a - 400 I -Se a aa I .
* ~ e on Zda- #A.~L. co .* ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v 4L a~ )~i v7 C
toa C~A .4'v iv .e 0 - a
* ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ FGR 26- .0 .ur~
I
0- V 1 1, iI
P- a
0 a Al5 AjCC5*
z c
3c c
0 1"
66 a
60 .' I , i . b1 - . .b, MA88
IA6 04 C3-a-a inC3C
cc W . i L 5 .W Mi I.-" Z- U.1 C2 88 .j _j
a.3 oc .U a hk2 eW, LU 6- 12 of "1 %6 JU.OL 14 an u88 .-
w 4r3 "4 y~ in 0 Z &h U t 0 1" wca ~ m iIu VP 5-& 0 . 1WV =I -VILJ=w ae cc9 u - woJI. b- c 4:1. 1 ad -- P! 1-1 0-b le.
%n j - i 9L 4- a.- w a. cc~Z %Ui w-l CL WL SA0CUJ-
LA 0 3 Li Uj -P %C 9 .4 49 A" rJ L., a, co4 w ' V, 46A ce Lu A~Iif1 2- 0- ' '1 -d - C* ) i t.JV U--L . )- r 0L&:;j! )-)- c : C5* C -- '): ~ ->. i
93 w u v 4 4 ,e o .J CL L -U be leLi&8. -S C efrIv tw gel e4
Lv -j -d Ne 4 4- 4 be La "A Li Id. at 60 - -j W.- _j .J-4 i8 vL " W 8..l 6 - j t
49 L
a- I" inV 84 VN 4 r . % m44mi n I V C O c c - Q On
in1 do umIIt I I 1 7 Iw w 'n
Li 2;w wJf w - ,0 .U jwn~ .1 4. %. - .
- - -u - - - - - - ^J 'm Q Co 71 r- c , ~I 3c a c - u n 0 0 0 Cc cC . (a 8- O- j-O C.
bi 4Li
or cc.
6 1 0 .3C', 0 .00
*~ *. 8' , Q
El Iv"4 4 I I1
X, . .
*0 4 I*
0. u- *0U*j Me La 0
0 0 L-c 6. olAA 0. G
de *0
0 r W
.0 *3r d Ii "I I V,
4b 00 C *
et t p
00 T at00 .f~G* .L.
Ga :p- C
0* IN l a0 61 .j w
ae w') 0-
CC2
a r 0n l 7 4 1 0-~ CD 00
* 0 A voC en (m
GO . ,'. wl C00.: -- *
4t w 2 4 j ~ *S
0* I.3 ~ ~ 2- CGo 2
or 40 '"1'
-C 3~:Th~ *_ ~ -
ac~ ~ i H I
*~ ~ L -: 2
*I I I
As Wit'In
f! Jc ih. U.t-,o m u 8LJo L4" I -Cm I j i- 2ad Ii ze j I iJ o:c A aw - jI
* 3I--j 0" UI =r *j Z~ 0J -JOO - 0 - 100 0000 ku OCj j OrU. a,-OO-'Ci j j -
LL * U 4 i44 -j %J o dx-1- cc.c4e w c cX_ - c~Lc _j 4-f .44c. _j tw
I. z z o I.- -0M CD z I2 -X;,. 4z- i W. . o - j 47*1 2; - j j M: 2 J 9- Ii i L -L
APPENDIX B
IMPACT EVALUATION PROCESSES AND PROGRAMS
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The computer outputs illustrated and described in this appendix support the
* impact evaluation processes discussed in Section 2.0. The data presented is
sufficient to determine that the evaluation procedure is valid and can be used
to detail the impacts of change to the architecture. It is assumed that this
appqndix will be the basis for demonstration of the evaluation process when cur-
rent system problems caused by conversion to UNIVAC are corrected.
2.0 SELECTED FORCE DEFINITION
A selected force consisting of manually selected Standard Requirements Code
(SRC) of various military units (Company, Battalion, Brigade) is used as a model
for evaluating change impact. The size of the force selected can vary depending
upon the scope of the evaluation. In selecting the force the analyst decides the
quantity of each SRC to be included in the force and specifies at what level roll-
up will occur. A roll-up SRC is discussed and illustrated in Section 4.1.
I
3.0 PERSONNEL AND EQUIPMENT COST COMPARISONS
This section illustrates the TRADOC TOE cost program TEP 19 which compares
selected TOE and provides basic cost data for O&S personnel pay and allowance and
equipment. These are the prime drivers of life cycle costs. The report provided
by this program is in two major sections; personnel costs and equipment costs.
The personnel section lists annual costs by grade and military occupation speciality
(MOS) and prints out strength level and total cost difference. Table B-1 is an
example of personnel cost comparison of the current TOE 11035H000 AIM Division Signal
Battalion to TOE 11035S610 which is the planning TOE for the Heavy Division Signal
Battalion. The last entry on this example shows a personnel strength requirement for
TOE 11035H000 of 702 as compared to a personnel requirement of 801 for TOE 11035S610.
By following the columns across to the extreme lower right it can be determined that
the additional 99 personnel required for TOE 11035S610 will result in an additional
annual cost of $1,165,270.
B
B- 1
,0 i111 l I 1 1 114 jo -T , 1,00icw0 N1 co -ac .0 Ca .r cc C10 000QQa 0 0Q00, 0000 000
W"Ai 0 "I 'n a, CU a.lO U.0 00 0 0A 0~ 0I 0 0 Q 0 0 0 a. 0 00Q0 0 O' 0 ~T 11 7 We, I"%& .* 7 .? ,r .7 4 2.
07.~7.*. .f C . .7 . ... . . . .
fy a 'T od ryc W- ol 01 c cc) 0. 00O a00 OiDOO oO OQ 00 0 00 0 0000 N
* ~ ~ ~ ~ - 01C IT - 0- 0ne ic ae:a ae. . . .
n7 CO 0' l0 ; ;;7z;
LA a 'r;; N 0 G'C fu vof n9r6%r 04 wa r 4 Ae 2U 0 f F
W%. U .. . W b7 AM
IA AU .h U . mUI. a0 47. a y 0S . A cc A 4 .-3 1 0 ~ IA 14J3m 1%m . U.
A. Uma -. ft Pt.4 ,N 45 Ne mV do ly 6% N d- W% P-a on .. e - -.. C U
- - .d 6 a f. M-rn - rv Oft V A fl. am :.-ti0.MN0U " r. ..V
ca ru ft 1
1P% pqP P! N0- f P -%eq q~, 40%e,- vV- e P P7* ~ ~ ~~e V. K4 N.#2 SN~ n NC.PnF~ %
V% 0 0% in 0 f r- t- F! C am 0 c 4" e" n I- r . 1 P. cc&
WA'' ~
As shown on Table B-2, the second section of this report compares equipment
cost. For example, the last entry on this table shows that Radio Set, AN/GRC-( )-
(V5) costs $1920 each. The table shows that TOE 11035H000 is not authorized any
of these radios but TOE 11035S610 has an authorized allowance of 68. The last
column shows that the addition of 68 of these radio sets to TOE 11035S610 will
cost $130,560. Considerable manual effort is required to sum the costs for each
unit into the total cost for the entire selected force. In the future it may be
possible to modify the programs illustrated in Section 4.0 below to roll-up and
summarize equipment cost and O&S personnel cost in a manner similar to the ef-
fectiveness data. In addition, the output report of TEP 19 provides changes in
quantity and type of signal equipment planned in the selected units, and the
program identifies by MOS code and grade the number of O&M signal personnel as-
signed in the planned units. Manual screening is required to identify only
signal personnel and equipment. When the screening process is complete, equipment
change data and signal personnel evaluation data is extracted and prepared as
input to the system definition and evaluation programs discussed below.
4.0 SYSTEM DEFINITION AND EFFECTIVENESS MEASUREMENT1
4.1 SYSTEM DEFINITION MODEL (TOELIST)
This section describes previous programming actions taken to implement
an Equipment Assignments to Force Units Procedure which results in a force -
equipment system definition called TOELIST.
The AIIMS Data Base contains the equipment issue basis for current, three
Transition and the Objective Systems of INTACS. The data base itself is
classified because it contains the Program Objective Memorandum (POM) force
and consequently the equipment required to support that force. By specifying
an unclassified generic force model, the equipment issue basis by TOE unit in
the AIIMS Data Base can be used to determine equipment requirements for a
selected force.
Within the selected force file, a "roll-up" SRC is one which will
represent a summation of other "sub-SRCs". For example, Table B-3 is a
computer printout of the force file used to demonstrate the System Definition
Program and is a doctrinal Armored Division with its associated Corps units.
I
IINTACS UPDATE, Volume V, Study of Battlefield Data Systems Burden on Tactical
Communications, Integrated Model Methodology, August 1979.
B-3
IA~~~~4 .0 .9 . A 0 4iI 45 40 d. a, -o0 .0 aA aA .' a A i I A .. .- 4 * .0 t
q* % 0 .0 .0 .0
fy . fri N Ny M 'r Ift IV% % "% %A a%
I&. en %-no.e N tv M 4 M " Jm %nC 4
-a em N~ i6C rn
-J o
3o, 2M x ~ IF 00 0 0 10 0 C 00 40 '0 jO0 0 !a 0 I
ad im61A 00 0 0 0 00 A 0 e" 40
.iJ:C; 00m I A I !CIO 9, Cou A P .. u e
.r.
at~
0f (m IIJ
hu C, -4 in
n~a T #I.% i- .9.03 -i I
IA w. I-. w.. - I -
51~~~~~. t ' 0 ~ I . ~I iIat ~~ &M I I
-e a ma 3- log LI- L J bOP ii Iem -. -04 A"
die st 1 .4 a - 4 .4 A -.ma! 19 ,a-w. I~ I ~
.. at
on 10 0~ 0 0 .. 0 -A uj .0 = UC-0 6, Li v 1w ,.a %J '3C .. . 66 0. *1 0. d, '
md F a.. P. :.n r4 EW . w.rI. Z , '
JW U. a- ^.~ ' z ~ 1 L.~ IA jB-4
AI .4 In- 4 l4. 4- .4po1 4 4 4- 41 ". 4- f
&P I -0 IrI r0 4 1 QF l r'
-1 - - I~ !V-- 'II
It4: 9- 4 60% --Awww Iwwt J%
:B-5
a
The SRC 06300H given in the left-most column is a "roll-up" SRC for Division
Artillery (DIVARTY). Its associated "sub SRCs" or subordinate units are
listed in third column from the left and the quantity of those units in the
right-most column. Other "roll-ups" are made for the Division Signal
Battalion (SIG BN), Division Support Command (DISCOM), Division Air Defense
Artillery Battalion (ADA BN) and for the Corps units located in the Division
area. The purpose of this "roll-up" process it to allow the analyst to view
the equipment requirements within certain critical functional areas i.e. fire
support (DIVARTY), command and control (SIG BN), administration and logistics
(DISCOM) and air defense (ADA BN).
In order to allow for broader use of this process and preclude the
program from "bombing" due to a SRC that is specified in the force file but
1-7 not in the AIIMS Data Base, a comparison routine was developed, Its purpose
is to scan the force file input, compare with the SRCs in the specified AIIMS
Force Model and alert the analyst as to those SRCs not available on file.
Table B-4 is a reproduction of this Force File/AIIMS Data Base SRC Filter.
At the lower left hand corner of the table in the program's output it
indicates that o? the SRCs contained in the force file, 06307H (Division
Target Acquisition Battery), 30165H (Division CEWI Battalion) and 41207H
(Corps Civil Affairs Company) are not contained in the AIIMS Data Base.
At this point the analyst must either develop the equipment issue basis
and inject -it or delete that unit from the selected force. For the output
example given later, the issue basis for SRCs 06307H and 41207H were manually
derived, input to a separate data base and injected in the program. The
issue basis for the CEWI Bn (30165H) was not input for the example program
output.
With the foregoing inputs, the program lists the equipment quantity in
each SRC, multiplies the number of like SRCs by the equipment in each and
sums the total equipment by "roll-up" SRC number. Table B-5 is a sample of
the output for SRC 06300H, DIVARTY.4The final step in the program sums the roll-up SRCs to arrive at the
total number of each type of equipment required to support the whole selected
force. Table B-6 is the sample output of the System Definition Program for
the force contained in Table B-3 in terms of the INTACS Objective System
equipments.
A program is available to inject changes of unit and equipments to the
System as represented by TOELIST.
B-6
t A c a
r.
0. .I I I I
U I tI I I . 4 .
* I .U
* . J~4*L , 6
,~ ~ I:
4L W. 0 W..
-~I - -. -
I>. *
- . Z 4I -M~S
.4 X-7
40
I ..3. .. . . .
. X. . .. .. ' . . . . . . . . . .
z -
. .. . . . 4 . j .
a a B-8
IC03 It C(7015(
A501 Lt. 01 *1 ~l 14 C - .
"co. .o-1 GODl
-- ga - - . 10111 su .. 12
A8009) TACSIT £41C011 enSue.S.3
_________________ 55007 ISCIAC T O CC3lt COLC £...-
_________________________ ...ht o . 01?. U.... COP" -
- -- - - - - -£5~~~40041 kIR-0;SIJI~e~~ 2 - . . .
£40042 111-3465 . ..£4. - . . -
A-S- 51143 11-22 151224II tl
541010 60 015Oqu s tOC om 010DUST &a _________
I. -. sARMS P1C-313ML05 CCIN - 5
A0RMS ls laR0ts UNI Tl) .
-AO& PS 5511 O N~iIC FAII Y55T
F..--. £1033 OYCC ow.. IC Capita&lL
-I. . -malo Is Row n TS-ols .420 .. .
Equipent ssigment rogrm .~ --.. -551l 9 - - .- -- - -.
forINACSObeciveSyteA- 1-1M 611 IS106! CAt a
550l MCR-IsO a I 503! ti . v~t . S a
AA IS '40101 111 10I3OCCi.I- 1 - . . . --
Apollo 511-99u1 -1ocs~ . _________4~. a10 1AtIT0I.6 eatoCs 24.) its
45014210630313lite IOU CWIl .3PA UNIT
'Euimet0ssgnen3Pogam _A(1111110--eo~.0 -_ 9.
for~0*3 ForceS Litdi al.-- OWI.V91 - too
S 40 3002 _ C -AT SC WE .H - - _ ~ . 3 ,0~-
ACT S 013 0I.l .- -PSA -APC IRL~
*- -- - -- . -.- 6 01 6. L 1 U I I ?C
0)011e PIC-IQSo 5113 II- v3
Iste8-9 9 "CIITM-14C4
-I
4.2 EFFECTIVENESS MEASUREMENT (MOETOELIST)
This section describes programming efforts to implement the Equipment
Related MOE Effectiveness Measurement Procedure called MOETOELIST. The
procedure is essentially a set of straight-forward arithmetic calculations
aimed at deriving eleven of the INTACS Measures of Effectiveness (MOE):
Weight, Volume, Total Power, Preventive and Corrective Maintenance Total
and Without Test Equipment, Personnel, Transport Vehicles, Secure Subscribers
and Equipment Categories for a defined communications system. As such,
it is dependent upon the output of the System Definition Program (TOELIST)
previously discussed in Section 4.1. In fact TOELIST is repeated in the
beginning of MOETOELIST.
An Equipment Characteristics Data Base is required as input so that
the eleven MOE can be derived for whatever equipment is used to define a
system. Table B-7 is a sample format of this data base with indication
of the source of the data. Samples of Weight, Cube, Wattage and Maintenance
i" data available on computer files are shown on Tables B-7 A-C. A comparison
between those items output from the System Definition Program and those items
contained in the Equipment Characteristics Data Base is made at the outset
so that those characteristics not in the data base are indicated early in
the procedure.
A sample of the output of the Equipment Related MOE Effectiveness
Measurement Program, MOETOELIST, is shown in Table B-8. 'While the sample
only shows measurements for total force as the bottom line, the preceding
portions of MOETOELIST show the same eleven measurements for each SRC and
K roll-up unit.
5.0 CONCLUSION
The full potential of this process will be realized only when system problems
*,that have been created by conversion to UNIVAC are corrected.
The Impact Evaluation Process is a valid procedure which can be used to
assess the impact of change to architecture. The results of evaluation may
.be used as a basis for selection of alternate courses of action or justification
for the selected course of action.
i10
~B-10
- I 1 V
Nj z
uu
k l'' ~ ~
rtqCL 4 "
L~~~~2 it 1 i I~~
L ~t E-4.- CA - 02a - I
'' I _ _ 0 H1
-o En - .ii-IF i1 I lI
~-.-----. 4 .2......' j 1E ~ ~ 4 I f~ 0*
0 ____. ~ 1- ~i F.!P6--- . - - -.
i2-.~.7w7 -1- .
i.A0
. - ----- 4-
~~iTT +V~hh1~+T< 1--qi r
____ ____ ____~J---~ n
zIf 2- ___ ___ _ ___ IE
Ii~4I p
~ i±1.I~~j~*z~j
. ps
64 04 Ui .r40 0 . *# S* aO 0.0 0 0 a a s 0~ 0 so* off5 * S t S
V% N Q4 NA IT- 0 N 0"
JI i 17. -4m. .- 0i I SAW I . r
0 L.2 fF4I N N0P- .- - - -34I ! lf r p ZF
Ln *L k . - .7 0a Q. 2000 Q k20000 0 0 0 2 00 0
' 3 , I
-dgn g 1. I : 9 1 .:-1 ! P 1
I' NW wf 4
6 IN zI ~ I a-0 0a
3J I I -
ce 2*~~~0 CLp'' .ce FYl r 01 IN IA C0 M 00 0A
4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' be W U. W 'P > > W -4 0 - J -~ ... j.. J J. ~ . j
9A ~U .9 LrjU WiN C C Q j Ce M w " N , . j Col . D 1.% zt - noa N..g J% o
acI SL LD4 -- Ll 0e
*-----------------------------------00 00--------------------------------------------------------0
IN :2 w, n 6.,4 ~-1-n-zz-- ;--------z zz
"a 0 On oO U.%a a J a 61 4 .i 0o ci CJ -jO CI C i 00 CQ O ai (20 (20 6i LIC -) -E -it -U -J LI- -iL 3(~ 0L
* P. Vb on A -j --
000000 moo
00000 0
~ a-~ ~ XJ. X~.Z
@.,i 4p.00 444
4 0 i3 000 Li0 C3 o w C~ ~o0N - a6
tv)
t- M-.-;. 2 ! -7r
Qi.. 02. F.- cr
7p 14 :, IL C.IN 4xaz -
ve -j -Z CLC au 1-
-~ ~ ~ : 3.0 zi-s O -. , -3'- -c-
4 W r o..5 t-
-4 l.A .,, A .. X- A 1 4C~
- 4 ~ . m~ 4 £ ~ - Q~~ ** **~ ~ ~ B-41 3*
RD-A127 621 INTEGRATED TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM (INTACS) 242AUTOMATED SYSTEM MANAGEMENT INFORMATION PROCESSES(U)MARTIN MARIETTA DENVER AEROSPACE CO 20 SEP 81
UNCLASSIFIED DRAK21-79-C-6i~i F/G 17/2 NL
.. 7
1111*~5W2 12.2
11111.81ii 1.25 ii1. ____
111111 1 Now 1.6
MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHARTNATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS- 93-A
0 d . *
ca do 0 in em ..af P.. a.caS ~ P. P '
ae a . a C. 1. 61 ' U' -
96 'A NY 4 4 a. 4 4 .* de %D W) p in ) Nl P.0 PON POI N P
x 0 .. 4
.0 07 a a 0 (a 0 0 07 . ' U
LI a 0 c 0 0 0 t 0 Z 0
& ~ L0 w V) CL C1 w1 P1 P2 L4 w f P1 r #A (. P1 9L 01
CA VI WL I I 'AU L ( .cm
zd z P- " x "j " 0- x " 2
0.2 0 0 0 Z 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 x
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0z -9 2 r P 4 1 4 j 4 -j 1 -4 1 49 1 -9 2 -4 -1 P4 -K P
o 4 0 .4 4 0 .4 4 6 .4 0 4 04 0 4 4 91 4 0 4 0
Fn U.) 0. M . f" U.) Nl UOI P . .4 . fn U
0
0 .4 -1 -4 .4 -1 d .0 -1 -4 .4 P4 . 4 . .4 4 .4 4 .4 4 4 -4 4 .4 4
W CA
z at xx x*K 01.2s b -C - 4 - . K w . C .4 - C - a 4 - a
* Wf .4 -4 P44 .4 - N4 ft P4 N4 "4 on -V 04. . .4 UN .4 % U% U% 10 .4
OroL .4 0 0 0 dl L2 4 Q4 4 04 04 04 0 0 4 '4 t. 0 04 %3 .4 0 4 0
'.v .7'40 a
I- z~f z z x z 2 2 z 2 z 2 z z 2 z 2 2 2 z z
ac 0 4 .94 4 0 4 N C N P1 P1 7 . . 4 9 .4 9 -9 W 4 -K C -K .7 49 - 09
w4 An 0 .0 0 w0 &A vs l vi l 0. CA W V1 W N N0 N N 4 0 0 - W (A' P1 a0 0 N 0 0 0 -4 P1 N 0 . 0 10 a 0 .4 a4 0' . 0
at ~ ~ a : if o .0 of A a (v a a ix c a ae w a a M M ix of
ft .4 -4 PA U' P1l PM P-1 *.-n a on on 40 0 P 2 *4ft P1 PC tC P2 .7 .7 &7 . 7 . 7 . 7 7 . 7 . 4 r U% U' :' U
0 0 9% 0 V .A . P. P. F N. Pf" Fn on P" on on pq fu ey 0% on %D %
'D a 0 P4 f4 dy m N N 4 N N 4 cm N 40 go N P N a- 0 N
O 0 0 01 0 0 10 a, 13 41 a 0 10 a, 0 am z 0 a 0"- 1. 1 S 4 4 P 44 N 1404A ^1 .4 .4 ft, NS N N 4 P O41 a 0 0 0 10 0 0 40 0 40 a .0 0o 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
W, u0 V% 0 U% 0 to I 0t V1 0l W* Z.7 V, %I% 1 .0N N10
I- .t a to o o a a on Nn 04 0m Nn N Nn Nf Na N on P, 0 pi Na a
P. 0 8 . 0 N N0 % N0 N, N0 N0 N, N N go 0 0 N a a o 3
. .4 .4 . . ..
:Q a 'a GOa a2 a 0 10 ' a~ 0 a a
0 0 0 0 C CC
- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '03 0 0 9 1CI 0 io0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a a ,o 3 0 .
: 0 : : 0 A 09 0 '0' k . zc00 0 06L0 Kr0 0 *0 00 1
c I I a IOa a 0 0 0
"C! 0 0 14 41 1
.A6A 1 . -C
I CI
r-- Wa' II
3L sw;
2 A !-. .11 -2 3
CL I A -a c I
A~% I .'
APPENDIX C
SIGNAL PERSONNEL REQUIREMENTS
This appendix describes a personnel program which was developed under
" the INTACS Study.
Army furnished Audit Trail (ALFA) - INTACS Personnel ADP Run 1975
. was provided to simplify tracking the quantity of personnel in support
*of INTACS candidates. This program must be updated and slightly modified
for summing by officer (OFF),Warrant Officer (WO), and Enlisted (ENL) in
order for it to furnish the data required to support the update of INTACS
Architecture.
Personnel ADP justification and outputs for the following requirements
are desciibed below:
0 Signal MOS personnel in non-Signal units.
O All personnel in Signal units.
1.0 JUSTIFICATION FOR COMPUTER SUPPORT
In order to determine the number of Signal MOS personnel in the INTACS
force model non-Signal units, programming for access to and formatting of data
from the TOE file at Fort Leavenworth is required.
The magnitude of these audit trails is reflected by the following:
o There are approximately 400 discrete TOEs in the force model:
42 Signal and 358 non-Signal.
2.0 ADP SUPPORT REQUIRED
2.1 Force Model Listing (INTACS Study)
This is the prerequisite to subsequent listings:
Unit TOE's, quantity, by echelon.
2.2 Personnel
0 Total Signal MOS personnel, (Enclosure 3), in all TOE's, subtotalled
in 8 groups: Supvr/con (C&C), Radio (05), Wire, Switching, Comcen
(TTY), COMSEC (KY), Multichannel, and Maintenance. Also, subtotal
4 "C-1
by OFF, WO, and ENL. (See Enclosure I - Format )o Non-Signal MOS personnel, (Other-Enclosure 4), in Signal TOE's
subtotalled in 6 groups: P&A, Supply, Food Service, Aircraft
O&M, Wheeled veh O&M (MTR), A/V. Also, subtotal by OFF, WO,
and ENL. (See Enclosure 1)
o Roll-up MOS for each echelon and for Force. Also, subtotal by
OFF, WO, and ENL. (See Enclosure 2)
3.0 OBJECTIVE SYSTEM
In addition to the foregoing, a TOE work file for the INTACS Objective
System must be established and placed in the TOE data base file at Fort
Leavenworth.
The INTACS study was approved by HQs Dept. of the Army on 17 February
1976 however to date no known effort has been made to formulate working
draft TOE's to support the Objective System.
Basic information to support formulation of INTACS Objective System
working draft TOE's is available in Task V and VI of the DA approved INTACS
study and in the INTACS System Architecture (Objective System Refinement)
dated May 1979. Chapter 2, TRADOC Pamphlet 71-4 provides procedures and
guidance which are to be followed when placing working draft TOE into the
TRADOC automated data files.
Placement of the INTACS Objective System TOE working file into the
TRADOC data base will facilitate responsive and rapid update of the Ob-
jective System as approved changes occur.
0 MOS's of concern include some 65 signal and 58 other specialties-
or a total of 123 MOS's. The 65 signal MOS's are divided into 8
functional categories; ie.: Supervisory/control, radio, wire,
switching, Comcen, COMSEC, multichannel, and maintenance.
The audit trails for INTACS started with data extracted from the
- Army TOE data bank to establish the baseline ALFA, followed by manual
adjustment and rationale through each of the succeeding candidate de-
signs. In order to reduce the manual effort to a manageable level
within the time frame allowed, the following support/programming tasks
were accomplished:
C-2
o Rearrange the force model card deck-in terms of TOE's by echelon,
by quantity.
o Enable extraction of MOS data by 14 functional groups in 1 run
for signal M0S's and for non-signal.
o Enable the computer to scan TOE recapitulation sections and display
total MOS groups per TOE.
o Enable the computer to search TOE paragraphs containing signal MOS's
in non-signal units.
Enclosures:
1. Signal Personnel MOS Format
2. Personnel MOS Roll-up
3. MOS Grouping # 1-8, Signal
4. MOS Grouping # 1-6 Non-Signal
C-3
coo0 0 a 0 0 ao aC~ @Oocco
co a0 0ccocoo 0000coaco aam400C
N* W4% .9 jc60'
Za co a-0 C- C
0 20000=
49 4.
woo ao W @ Ccoooool W0000 0,cQ =400 @0 C,0.CcC 0 0
000 Co~co 0 000COCO o COolcoOCOom CD 0 0 0 M 0 C
C0 a 0 0 &40000O
00 01 .IL. Ia. Ia I.
x m Oce g 0-..@0 . , C X P- 0 a 0 0
3 3fBAu
I- Q 0 n0 0i 000 po0om1 uC --
o 0 MO x -S4CPf
m* 42 w a az C
49 U U UU L
4;6 N02 20. -I 4 -6CY. C 0 2
U UU 0. x.
x 01 0
4.
LA 0 -Q 1k
46 1.
u U
C.' N M -S ULI 4 b -tJNI- -N V M a..)Z.4-. P. 1.
-hc-4
i .0
* *44- N , b- c..N
C ,. CCONA
0 - 9. -4 -I LA0 )"~3
0. 15- O La, a C Z a 3 N* x -17 ZM
ew f. ..-. --- 0 - 'C C'C 4 M M~ M I' M
44 QQ--
a.. a
.0- 0P4 CLSO ~N N
r- 'n I t ciC
*K 04 0 i P.0 N -? " P- 4 i -
IO*... kiCC.AJ -atA 4 1-3 N
a.~~~~~~- fnAb~f'.C .0'rJ'lA . %PP-
D 4 OD0 - C o
cu Z01 10- CJ
A.C a. f- LA 4.
X0 -0 Z 71 r) "
Nl 5- N -3 4 P.P 5- )I t- Xa M NW-
2 4 4 NI" 4 N ~ i
3. 0 c30
It's
C )-.~.0 ' ~40MIV ' 1
I-f
P.-~~ enIti
o 4 ~ - o1 % c ix In It
~.. j,:.CJ IN M3 0f
~.3 rl .. 4 i
iefi. C--5f e 8l *433
It
I ad XwuaIIn I nF e 5 o%
1 n E- OwC
"4 m rI .C
I I4
I
B I29 e
I~c Ifi 0f I
fn 1%O%
29 on n en
Ic -C .4 C%&M ~ ~ &M4 r r - -4P4-
4* N r-M C)Ilclc
* U* U)~c-6
I II II II II II II I
I II I
I II I
I I'I I
I I
I I
* II II II I
I II II I
I II I
'I II II I f-I
4 I II I
I II I
f-I 4I 0 I ~
If~%OOO%~%D~O~OI '0 I
~-., '.4U) I I
* I* - I
0* 2 I I
* I I~ 4002U) ~U~fz1 ~X~I-'NI-. ~ I 0000 00 I 4~IC~r-I-I-P-F-r-!-
* -4 4 .- d4~4~4 0000000 r%0%O%~O0%0%0%0%DI 4..4.4~4~4-4
0' I I* I I
04 I4o 0 I - I -*0 -4 0%.
I 0I I
* I I* I I
I I* p4
44 I 44~ 0~4
I.I~. I %0%0 I I~I%~%* 0 U)
* -4 I I* 0* I
* p3I I
* I
I I444 I I 0~tI~-eO%0
P. -t4mf £ ~4 0~.I%0
I II I
I I
I I C-?I
I~~ ... j
ItI
46,S
44
Ilk,~J 4,
44
4 -MAF
