Upload
gwidon
View
30
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
D evelopment of a small animal irradiation system. Magdalena Bazalova Stanford University, CA, USA. Small animal radiotherapy team. Fred van den Haak Jiali Xu Xinzhi Zhu Yongjiang Xian Phuoc Tran Sanjeev Datta and others. Edward Graves, PI Paul Keall Hu Zhou Manuel Rodriguez - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Stanford University
Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford
MIPSDepartment of Radiation Oncology and
BIO-X, School of Medicine
Development of a small animal Development of a small animal irradiation systemirradiation system
Magdalena BazalovaMagdalena BazalovaStanford University, CA, USAStanford University, CA, USA
Stanford University
Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford
MIPSDepartment of Radiation Oncology and
BIO-X, School of Medicine
Small animal radiotherapy teamSmall animal radiotherapy team
• Edward Graves, PIEdward Graves, PI• Paul KeallPaul Keall• Hu ZhouHu Zhou• Manuel RodriguezManuel Rodriguez• Geoff NelsonGeoff Nelson• Rahil JoganiRahil Jogani• Amy MotomuraAmy Motomura
• Fred van den HaakFred van den Haak• Jiali XuJiali Xu• Xinzhi ZhuXinzhi Zhu• Yongjiang XianYongjiang Xian• Phuoc TranPhuoc Tran• Sanjeev DattaSanjeev Datta• and othersand others
Stanford University
Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford
MIPSDepartment of Radiation Oncology and
BIO-X, School of Medicine
Why small animal radiotherapyWhy small animal radiotherapy
• Rotating radiation sources, conformal Rotating radiation sources, conformal collimators, image guidance and verification collimators, image guidance and verification are widely used in modern RT.are widely used in modern RT.
• Analogous systems for small animal RT lack Analogous systems for small animal RT lack most of these features.most of these features.
• Spatial and dosimetric accuracies achievable Spatial and dosimetric accuracies achievable with existing systems are limited.with existing systems are limited.
• 3D conformal animal RT systems are highly 3D conformal animal RT systems are highly desirable.desirable.
Stanford University
Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford
MIPSDepartment of Radiation Oncology and
BIO-X, School of Medicine
Current small animal RT systemsCurrent small animal RT systems• Washington University: Washington University: 192192Ir with fixed Ir with fixed
collimatorscollimators• John Hopkins University: imaging with 120kVp, John Hopkins University: imaging with 120kVp,
treatment with 225kVp non-coplanar beamstreatment with 225kVp non-coplanar beams• Princess Margaret Hospital: a decomissioned Princess Margaret Hospital: a decomissioned
simulator tube for imaging and 225kVp beam simulator tube for imaging and 225kVp beam for treatmentfor treatment
• Stanford: modified microCT scanner with Stanford: modified microCT scanner with 120kVp beam for both imaging and treatment120kVp beam for both imaging and treatment
Stanford University
Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford
MIPSDepartment of Radiation Oncology and
BIO-X, School of Medicine
Stanford small animal radiotherapyStanford small animal radiotherapy
• Based on an eXplore RS120 microCT scannerBased on an eXplore RS120 microCT scanner
Stanford University
Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford
MIPSDepartment of Radiation Oncology and
BIO-X, School of Medicine
Turning an imaging device into a Turning an imaging device into a treatment machinetreatment machine
• The tumor has to be positioned to the The tumor has to be positioned to the isocenter of the microCT scanner for isocenter of the microCT scanner for treatment – treatment – two-dimensional translation two-dimensional translation stage.stage.
• The photon beam has to be conformal to the The photon beam has to be conformal to the shape of the tumor – shape of the tumor – two-stage variable two-stage variable aperture collimator.aperture collimator.
Stanford University
Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford
MIPSDepartment of Radiation Oncology and
BIO-X, School of Medicine
Two-dimensional translation stageTwo-dimensional translation stage• Mounted on the microCT couch (Mounted on the microCT couch (zz axis), moves axis), moves
in in xx and and yy, controlled by a software (written , controlled by a software (written in?) from the microCT computer.in?) from the microCT computer.
The reproducibility is The reproducibility is better than 0.05mm in better than 0.05mm in both directions.both directions.
Stanford University
Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford
MIPSDepartment of Radiation Oncology and
BIO-X, School of Medicine
CollimatorCollimator• A variable aperture collimator installed in the A variable aperture collimator installed in the
gantry between the x-ray source and the bore.gantry between the x-ray source and the bore.• 0 – 102 mm (fully open for imaging)0 – 102 mm (fully open for imaging)
Stanford University
Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford
MIPSDepartment of Radiation Oncology and
BIO-X, School of Medicine
Calibration of the collimatorCalibration of the collimator
• Physical aperture vs machine unit calibrationPhysical aperture vs machine unit calibration– Using solid cylinders with diameters ranging from Using solid cylinders with diameters ranging from
6mm to 36mm with precision of 0.025mm.6mm to 36mm with precision of 0.025mm.– Readings of the position sensor fit with a linear Readings of the position sensor fit with a linear
function.function.• Collimator-beam axis alignmentCollimator-beam axis alignment– Displacement and tilting have to be minimizedDisplacement and tilting have to be minimized• Split field test.Split field test.• Imaging of a fixed object at 0° and 180°.Imaging of a fixed object at 0° and 180°.• Evaluation of the hexagonal beam profiles.Evaluation of the hexagonal beam profiles.
Stanford University
Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford
MIPSDepartment of Radiation Oncology and
BIO-X, School of Medicine
Collimator beam-axis alignmentCollimator beam-axis alignmentox
0°
180°0° 180°
Displacement and tilting adjustments after Displacement and tilting adjustments after the calibration were less than 0.1 mm.the calibration were less than 0.1 mm.
Stanford University
Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford
MIPSDepartment of Radiation Oncology and
BIO-X, School of Medicine
Collimator performanceCollimator performance
• Collimator motion times.Collimator motion times.
Stanford University
Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford
MIPSDepartment of Radiation Oncology and
BIO-X, School of Medicine
Dosimetric characterization of the Dosimetric characterization of the systemsystem
• Performed with EBT Gafchromic films and an Performed with EBT Gafchromic films and an ion chamber (PTW N30006).ion chamber (PTW N30006).
• EBT films offer high spatial resolution, they are EBT films offer high spatial resolution, they are tissue equivalent and show little energy tissue equivalent and show little energy dependence.dependence.
• Films were read out at 508 dpi using a flatbed Films were read out at 508 dpi using a flatbed Epson Perfection V500 scanner in light Epson Perfection V500 scanner in light transmission mode.transmission mode.
Stanford University
Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford
MIPSDepartment of Radiation Oncology and
BIO-X, School of Medicine
Dosimetric measurementsDosimetric measurements
Stanford University
Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford
MIPSDepartment of Radiation Oncology and
BIO-X, School of Medicine
Dose rate as a function of beam sizeDose rate as a function of beam size
Tube current Dose rate (Gy/min)(mA) 6.0 cm 5.0 cm 4.0 cm
50 2.13 2.08 2.0440 1.72 1.68 1.6225 1.11 1.08 1.02
Stanford University
Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford
MIPSDepartment of Radiation Oncology and
BIO-X, School of Medicine
PDD and beam profilesPDD and beam profiles• The dose rate is more than 1.5 Gy for beams The dose rate is more than 1.5 Gy for beams
as small as 2 mm.as small as 2 mm.• Beam penumbra and heel effect studied.Beam penumbra and heel effect studied.
Stanford University
Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford
MIPSDepartment of Radiation Oncology and
BIO-X, School of Medicine
Plan deliveryPlan delivery• 8 beams with diameters of 2 mm.8 beams with diameters of 2 mm.• The measured and calculated dose at the The measured and calculated dose at the
isocenter are within 1.5%isocenter are within 1.5%
Stanford University
Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford
MIPSDepartment of Radiation Oncology and
BIO-X, School of Medicine
Treatment planning systemTreatment planning system• Under developmentUnder development• GUI based on RT_ImageGUI based on RT_Image† † is linked to a MC system is linked to a MC system
based on the EGSnrc codes.based on the EGSnrc codes.• Inverse planning is being incorporated.Inverse planning is being incorporated.
• † † Graves EE, Quon A, Loo BW. RT_Image: An Open-Source Tool for Investigating PET in Graves EE, Quon A, Loo BW. RT_Image: An Open-Source Tool for Investigating PET in Radiation Oncology. Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment2007;6:111-121.Radiation Oncology. Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment2007;6:111-121.
Stanford University
Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford
MIPSDepartment of Radiation Oncology and
BIO-X, School of Medicine
Monte Carlo treatment planning for Monte Carlo treatment planning for small animal radiotherapysmall animal radiotherapy
• For kilovoltage photon beams, the dose has to For kilovoltage photon beams, the dose has to be calculated by the Monte Carlo (MC) method.be calculated by the Monte Carlo (MC) method.
• We investigated We investigated – the efficiency of MC dose calculation for kV photon the efficiency of MC dose calculation for kV photon
beams in submillimeter voxels beams in submillimeter voxels – the importance of tissue segmentation for kV photon the importance of tissue segmentation for kV photon
beambeam• BEAMnrc and DOSXYZnrc EGSnrc codes are used.BEAMnrc and DOSXYZnrc EGSnrc codes are used.• Two methods for dose calculations are studied Two methods for dose calculations are studied
and optimized.and optimized.• Dual-energy microCT imaging is studied.Dual-energy microCT imaging is studied.
Stanford University
Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford
MIPSDepartment of Radiation Oncology and
BIO-X, School of Medicine
MC dose calculationsMC dose calculations
Stanford University
Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford
MIPSDepartment of Radiation Oncology and
BIO-X, School of Medicine
Two calculation approaches: Two calculation approaches: comparisoncomparison
For (0.2×0.2×0.2) mmFor (0.2×0.2×0.2) mm33, , 120 kVp beam 120 kVp beam
• beam < 30 mm beam < 30 mm phase-space filesphase-space files
• beam > 30 mmbeam > 30 mmBEAMnrc sourceBEAMnrc source
3.0 GHz machine
Stanford University
Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford
MIPSDepartment of Radiation Oncology and
BIO-X, School of Medicine
Comparison of MC dose distributions Comparison of MC dose distributions to measurementsto measurements
• Using PDD curves and beam profiles parallel Using PDD curves and beam profiles parallel and perpendicular to heal effectand perpendicular to heal effect
Stanford University
Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford
MIPSDepartment of Radiation Oncology and
BIO-X, School of Medicine
Beam profilesBeam profiles
Stanford University
Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford
MIPSDepartment of Radiation Oncology and
BIO-X, School of Medicine
Tissue segmentationTissue segmentation• How important is it for MC dose calculations How important is it for MC dose calculations
using the microCT 120kVp beam?using the microCT 120kVp beam?a) b)
c)34 ICRU 34 ICRU tissuestissues
ICRU tissuesICRU tissues
0.3<0.3<ρρ<1.9<1.9(g/cm(g/cm33))
6.7<6.7<ZZ<14.0<14.0
Stanford University
Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford
MIPSDepartment of Radiation Oncology and
BIO-X, School of Medicine
Tissue segmentation - ResultsTissue segmentation - Results
Need to know Z.
Stanford University
Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford
MIPSDepartment of Radiation Oncology and
BIO-X, School of Medicine
Dual-energy microCT (DEmCT) imagingDual-energy microCT (DEmCT) imaging
• DEmCT is based on a DEmCT is based on a parameterization of the parameterization of the linear attenuation linear attenuation coefficient.coefficient.
• Results in Results in ρρ and and ZZ of each of each voxel.voxel.
• Tested on a mouse Tested on a mouse phantom and a calibration phantom and a calibration phantom with 70 and 120 phantom with 70 and 120 kVp beams.kVp beams.
Stanford University
Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford
MIPSDepartment of Radiation Oncology and
BIO-X, School of Medicine
DEmCT phantom: ResultsDEmCT phantom: Results• ρρ and Z extracted and Z extracted
with a reasonable with a reasonable accuracyaccuracy
• beam hardening beam hardening does seem to play a does seem to play a role (will be role (will be investigated)investigated)
• noise is an noise is an important issue, important issue, image quality should image quality should be improved be improved
Stanford University
Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford
MIPSDepartment of Radiation Oncology and
BIO-X, School of Medicine
DEmCT of a frozen mouseDEmCT of a frozen mouse• 11 organs of a mouse delineated and the 11 organs of a mouse delineated and the
mean HU of each organ used for DEmCTmean HU of each organ used for DEmCT
mouse extractedICRU human tissues
Stanford University
Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford
MIPSDepartment of Radiation Oncology and
BIO-X, School of Medicine
RT_ImageRT_Image
Stanford University
Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford
MIPSDepartment of Radiation Oncology and
BIO-X, School of Medicine
RT_Image and EGSnrcRT_Image and EGSnrc
• Interactive tissue and mass density segmentation.Interactive tissue and mass density segmentation.• EGSnrc input file is created, run on an 8-core Mac.EGSnrc input file is created, run on an 8-core Mac.
Stanford University
Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford
MIPSDepartment of Radiation Oncology and
BIO-X, School of Medicine
RT_Image is coolRT_Image is cool
Stanford University
Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford
MIPSDepartment of Radiation Oncology and
BIO-X, School of Medicine
Phantom irradiationPhantom irradiation
Stanford University
Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford
MIPSDepartment of Radiation Oncology and
BIO-X, School of Medicine
Mouse irradiationMouse irradiation
• MYC-induced lung tumors of two mice MYC-induced lung tumors of two mice irradiated to a dose of 2 Gy.irradiated to a dose of 2 Gy.
• Anesthetized mice were imaged at 70 kV.Anesthetized mice were imaged at 70 kV.• The target was localized and an 8 equally The target was localized and an 8 equally
spaced beam plan was created.spaced beam plan was created.• After irradiation, the mice were sacrificed and After irradiation, the mice were sacrificed and
tissue were harvested. The lungs fixed in tissue were harvested. The lungs fixed in formalin and cut into 20 mm sections. formalin and cut into 20 mm sections.
Stanford University
Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford
MIPSDepartment of Radiation Oncology and
BIO-X, School of Medicine
Mouse irradiation (cont.)Mouse irradiation (cont.)
• The section were stained with antibodies The section were stained with antibodies against against γγH2AX (double strand breaks) and H2AX (double strand breaks) and DAPI (to visualize cell nuclei).DAPI (to visualize cell nuclei).
• The immunohistochemical (fixed tissue) The immunohistochemical (fixed tissue) sections were visualized with fluorescence sections were visualized with fluorescence microscopy.microscopy.
Stanford University
Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford
MIPSDepartment of Radiation Oncology and
BIO-X, School of Medicine
Mouse irradiation planMouse irradiation plan
Stanford University
Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford
MIPSDepartment of Radiation Oncology and
BIO-X, School of Medicine
Fluorescence imagingFluorescence imaging
γH2AX
DAPI
~2 Gy ~0.3 Gy
Stanford University
Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford
MIPSDepartment of Radiation Oncology and
BIO-X, School of Medicine
DiscussionDiscussion
• Increase in temperature of the x-ray tube Increase in temperature of the x-ray tube generator – reduce duty cycle and take breaks generator – reduce duty cycle and take breaks between irradiationsbetween irradiations
• Tissue segmentation using DEmCT imaging is Tissue segmentation using DEmCT imaging is limited by microCT image quality. Noise has to limited by microCT image quality. Noise has to be reduced.be reduced.
Stanford University
Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford
MIPSDepartment of Radiation Oncology and
BIO-X, School of Medicine
ConclusionsConclusions
• A GE microCT scanner was successfully modified A GE microCT scanner was successfully modified for delivery of radiation to small animals.for delivery of radiation to small animals.
• MC treatment planning is close to its final MC treatment planning is close to its final version.version.
• Inverse treatment planning is being incorporated.Inverse treatment planning is being incorporated.• More than 20 mice have been irradiated.More than 20 mice have been irradiated.• Ready to irradiate more animals and study the Ready to irradiate more animals and study the
response of various tumors/tissues to radiation.response of various tumors/tissues to radiation.• For less than $25,000 (plus a microCT scanner).For less than $25,000 (plus a microCT scanner).
Stanford University
Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford
MIPSDepartment of Radiation Oncology and
BIO-X, School of Medicine
Small animal irradiationSmall animal irradiation