D4.1 Pilot project selection report

DisclaimerexcludingAgencyresponsibilityResponsibilityfortheinformationandviewssetoutinthisdocumentliesentirelywiththeauthors

ThisprojecthasreceivedfundingfromtheEuropeanUn-ion’sHorizon2020researchandinnovationprogramme

underGrantAgreementNo847100

D4.1Pilotprojectselectionreport

QualDeEPCH2020project

MAINAUTHOR:GatisŽogla(Ekodoma)

DATE:[29/04/2020]

DISSEMINATIONLEVEL:PUBLIC

_____________________________________________________________

ProjectQualDeEPC“High-qualityEnergyPerformanceAssessmentandCertificationinEurope

AcceleratingDeepEnergyRenovation“GrantAgreementno.847100

H2020-LC-SC3-EE-2018

QualDeEPCproject(847100) Page2of28

D4.1Pilotbuildingselectionreport Version1,30/04/20

DocumentFactsheet

Projectduration FromSeptember2019toAugust2022

Projectwebsite www.qualdeepc.eu

Document D4.1Pilotprojectselectionreport

WorkPackage WP4Testingtheapplicabilitythroughpilotcases

Task Task4.1:Identificationandselectionofbuildingsforthepilotcases

Version 1

Versiondate 29/04/2020

MainAuthor Ekodoma

Contributors WuppertalInstitut,CRES,DENA,EAP,Ekodoma,Energiaklub,Escan,CIT

Reviewers EkodomaandWuppertalInstitut

Typeofdeliverable R

Disseminationlevel PU

Table1:DocumentFactsheet

Documentstatus

ReviewstatusDraftWPleaderacceptedCoordinatoraccepted

Actionrequested

ToberevisedbypartnersForapprovalbytheWPleaderForapprovalbytheProjectCoordinatorTobedeliveredtotheCommission

Table2:Title

DocumentHistory

Version Date Mainmodification Entity

Draft1 27/04/2020 Firstdraft Ekodoma

Final 29/04/2020 Reviewed WuppertalInstitut

Table3:Title



PROJECTPARTNERSWI:WuppertalInstitutfürKLIMA,UMWELT,ENERGIEgGMBH

CRES:Centreforrenewableenergysourcesandsaving

DENA:DeutscheEnergie-AgenturGmbH(dena)

EAP:EnergyagencyofPlovdivAssociation

EKODOMA

ENERGIAKLUB:EnergiaklubSzakpolitikaiIntezetModszertaniKozpontEgyesulet

E-P-C:EPCProjectCorporationClimate.Sustainability.Communications.mbH

FEDARENE:Federationeuopeennedesagenciesetdesregionspourl’energieetl’environnement

ESCAN:EscanSL

CITENERGYMANAGEMENTAB



DISCLAIMEROFWARRANTIES“ThisprojecthasreceivedfundingfromtheEuropeanUnion’sHorizon2020,researchandinnovationprogramme,underGrantAgreementNo847100”

ThisdocumenthasbeenpreparedbyQualDeEPCprojectpartnersasanaccountofworkcarriedoutwithintheframeworkoftheEC-GAcontractno847100.

NeitherProjectCoordinator,noranysignatorypartyofQualDeEPCProjectConsortiumAgreement,noranypersonactingonbehalfofanyofthem:

(a) makesanywarrantyorrepresentationwhatsoever,expressorimplied,(i). withrespecttotheuseofanyinformation,apparatus,method,process,orsimilaritem

disclosed inthisdocument, includingmerchantabilityandfitness foraparticularpur-pose,or

(ii). thatsuchusedoesnot infringeonor interferewithprivatelyownedrights, includinganyparty'sintellectualproperty,or

(iii). thatthisdocumentissuitabletoanyparticularuser'scircumstance;or

(b) assumes responsibility for any damages or other liabilitywhatsoever (including any conse-quentialdamages,even ifProjectCoordinatororanyrepresentativeofasignatorypartyoftheQualDeEPCProjectConsortiumAgreement, hasbeenadvisedof thepossibility of suchdamages) resulting fromyour selectionoruseof this documentor any information, appa-ratus,method,process,orsimilaritemdisclosedinthisdocument.



PUBLISHABLESUMMARYInorder totest theenhancedEnergyPerformanceCertificateschemesdeveloped inWP3andpro-vide cross national comparison and recommendations for improvements before the adaption anddialogueactivitiesplannedinWP5fieldtestingisneeded.ForthefieldtestingpurposesitwaschosentousepilotcaseswhereforonebuildingbothastandardEPCandenhancedEPCismade.Basedontheliteraturereview,interviewsanddiscussionswithstakeholders(Tasks2.1and2.3)andtheStrategyPlandevelopedinTask2.4,differenttypesofbuildingswereselectedaspilotcasestotesttheenhancedEnergyPerformanceCertificateassessmentandcertificationprocedures.Pilot cases were identified based on consultations with facility managers/building owners andthroughwellestablishedprojectpartners’localnetworks.Pilotcaseswereselectedonthebasisoffairandtransparentcriteria:

• Commitment – pilot cases stakeholders have to commit to complete a feedbackquestion-naireontheassessmentandcertificationschemeandtopublishprojectdata(confidentialityissuesareconsidered)

• Availability–ofinputdata(energyconsumptiondata,technicaldrawings,informationaboutbuildingsystem,etc.)

• Coverage– ingeneral thepilotcasescoverdifferentbuildingusesandtypes ineachtargetcountry(withdifferentclimates).Foreachcountry,atotalof10to15buildingsweretobeselectedfortestingaspilotcases.Ofthese,5to8havetoberesidentialbuildingsand4to7non-residential buildings (such as offices, education buildings, supermarkets and shoppingcenters).

• Interestfrompublicinstitutions/stakeholdersandpublicvisibilityofthebuilding



TABLEOFCONTENTS

1 Pilotprojectselection..........................................................................................................8

2 Selectedpilotprojects..........................................................................................................9

3 CONCLUSIONS....................................................................................................................12

4 ANNEXES............................................................................................................................13

4.1 AnnexA:Participantinformationsheet 144.2 AnnexB:Datatobegatheredforabuilding 184.3 AnnexC.Criteriaforchoosingpilotbuildings 204.4 AnnexD:Pilotbuildings 24



INTRODUCTIONThisreportcontainsinformationonhowpilotprojectswereselectedanditalsocontainsinformationonthechosenpilotprojects.



1 PILOTPROJECTSELECTION

Duringpilotprojectselectionprocess itwasdefinedthatapilotprojectwillbeabuilding (insomecasesasingleapartment)becauseEnergyPerformanceCertificates(EPC)areissuedtoabuilding(orasingleapartment).

InordertomaketheprocessofpilotprojectselectionmoreunderstandabletopotentialpilotprojectrepresentativesaParticipantInformationSheetwasdeveloped.This informationsheetcanbeseeninAnnexAofthisreport.

Ekodoma developed criteria for the pilot building selection process. These criteriawere discussedbetweenallprojectpartners.ThefinalcriteriaforpilotbuildingselectioncanbeseeninAnnexCofthisreport.

BasedonthecriteriaforchoosingPilotbuildingseachinvolvedprojectpartnerchosepilotbuildingsintheirrespectivecountries.Thewayoffindingthepilotbuildingswaschosenbyeachprojectpart-ner.MostoftenthepilotbuildingswerechosenbyadvertisingthispossibilityindifferentSocialMe-diaaswellasbasedonconsultationswithfacilitymanagers/buildingownersandthroughwellestab-lishedprojectpartners’localnetworks.

Itwas important to gather preliminary information from chosen pilot buildings in order to under-standifdifferenttypesofbuildingshavebeenchosen.PreliminarydatathatwereaskedtoallpilotbuildingscanbeseeninAnnexBofthisreport.Insomecasesatthisstageofprojectthepilotbuild-ingsdidnothavetheaskeddata.



2 SELECTEDPILOTPROJECTS

BytheendofApril2020intotal58pilotbuildingshavebeenselected(Latvia-15;Greece-15;Bulgar-ia-11;Sweden–9;Spain–8;Germany–0;Hungary–0).DuetoCovid-19pandemictherearesomedelaysinpilotbuildingselectionprocess.Thereforethepilotbuildingselectionprocessisstillongoinginsomecountries.

NopilotbuildingssofarhavebeenchoseninGermanyandHungary.Itwasdecidedthatpilotbuild-ingsinGermanywillbechosenduringTask4.2whenEPCforabuildingisissuedaccordingtogiven(existing)practice. InGermany thiswill bedonenotbyQualDeEPCprojectpartnerDENAbutbyasubcontractedcompany.

Figure1.Pilotbuildingsbycountry

Fromthechosenpilotbuildings28areresidentialbuildingsand30arenon-residentialbuildings.

Figure2.Pilotbuildingsbybuildingtype

Latvia26%

Sweden15%

Greece26%

Spain14%

Bulgaria19%

Germany0%

Hungary0%

Residennal48%Non-residennal

52%



Fromthechosenresidentialbuildings19areapartmentbuildings,2aresinglefamilybuildingsand7aresingleapartments.

Figure3.ResidentialPilotbuildingsbytype

Fromthenonresidentialpilotbuildings17areeducationalbuildings,8areofficebuildingsand5areothertypesofnonresidentialbuildings.

Figure4.NonresidentialPilotbuildingsbytype

Theaimof thepilotbuildingselectionwas tochoosesuchbuildingswhichdonothaveanexistingEPC.Due toCovid-19pandemic in somecountries itwasdecided thatpilotbuildingswithexistingEPCswillbechoseninordernotodelayworkinTask4.2.Assessmentofpilotcasesineachcountrybasedongivenpractice. Intotal36pilotbuildingsdohaveexistingEPCsandonly22pilotbuildingsdonothaveanexistingEPC.

Apartmentbuilding68%

Singlefamilybuilding

7%

Asingleapartment

25%

Officebuilding27%

Educanonalbuilding56%

Other17%



Figure5.PilotbuildingsbythestatusofEPC

Mostofthechosenpilotbuildingsarebuiltbetween1960and1980.

Yearofconstruction Numberofbuildings1800-1900 21900-1940 41940-1960 61960-1980 241980-2000 142000-2020 3

Table 1. Amount of Pilot buildings by year of construction

PreliminaryinformationoneachofthechosenpilotbuildingscanbeseeninAnnexDofthisreport.

Preliminary pilot building data (Annex B) for each building is stored onQualDeEPC project’s cloudhttps://cloud.wupperinst.org/.

NoEPC38%

ExisnngEPC62%



3 CONCLUSIONS

TilltheendofApril2020thereare58buildingsthathavebeenchosenaspilotbuildings.Thechosenpilotbuildingsrepresentwidevarietyofbuildingtypesandbuildingconstructionyears.ThismeansthatthechosenpilotbuildingscanbeusedforanalysisandcomparisonofexistingEPCs(Task4.2oftheproject)andenhancedEPCs(Task4.3oftheproject).

TheprocessofpilotbuildingselectionisstillongoinginsomeQualDeEPCprojectpartnercountries.

DuetoCovid-19pandemictherehavebeensomedelaysinpilotbuildingselection.IfthepandemiclastslongerthanJulyorAugust2020thenitismostlikelythattherewillbedelaysinTasks4.2and4.3whereexistingandenhancedEPCsareissuedtothepilotbuildings.



4 ANNEXES



4.1 AnnexA:Participantinformationsheet

ParticipantInformationSheet

QualDeEPCH2020project

ProjectQualDeEPC

“High-qualityEnergyPerformanceAssessmentandCertificationinEurope



DearSirorMadam,

Youarebeinginvitedtotakepartinaresearchstudy.Beforeyoudecidewhetherornottotakepart,itisimportantforyoutounderstandwhytheresearchisbeingdoneandwhatitwillinvolve.Pleasetaketimetoreadthefollowinginformationcarefully.

WHATISQUALDEEPCABOUT?Consideringthat40%oftheEuropeanUnion’senergyconsumptioncanbetracedbackto itsbuild-ings, it isessentialto improvetheirenergyefficiency inordertoachievetheEU’senergyefficiencytargets.Boththerateofenergyrenovationanditsdepth,i.e.theamountofenergysavingsduringarenovation,needtobeimproved.An important instrument to enhance themarket uptakeof energy-efficient newbuildings and theenergy-efficientrenovationofexistingbuildingsaretheEnergyPerformanceCertificates(EPC),regu-latedbytheEnergyPerformanceofBuildingsDirective(EPBD)oftheEuropeanCommission.Theenergyperformanceassessmentandcertificationschemesofferanobjectiveestimateofabuild-ing’senergyefficiencyundernormaluseandcovermanyoftheaspectsforthelong-termrenovationstrategiesrequiredbytheEPBD.However,thereareseveralchallengestoovercomeinordertoin-creasemarketconfidenceandinciteinvestmentsinenergyefficientbuildings,suchasenhancedreli-ability,qualityoftherenovationrecommendations,cost-effectiveness,andcompliancewithrelevantEUstandardsandtheEPBD.

TheHorizon2020 fundedprojectQualDeEPC aims to enhance (1) the quality and cross-EU conver-gence of Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) schemes, and (2) the link between EPCs and deeprenovation.

QualDeEPCwillworkonEU-wideconvergenceofthebuildingassessmentandtheissuance,design,anduseofquality-enhancedEPCsaswellastheirrecommendationsforbuildingrenovation.Theaimis to make these recommendations coherent with deep energy renovation towards a nearly-zeroenergybuildingstockby2050.UnderthecoordinationoftheWuppertal Institute,theprojectpart-nerswillworktocreateconsensus in theparticipatingcountriesandbeyond,andto implementasmany improvements as possible during the project period, involving certification bodies, energyagencies,buildingsectorandcertificationstakeholders,andotherrelevantorganisations.

Inordertoreachtheobjectives,theprojectwillorganiseitsactivitiesinfourstages:

1. AnalysisofexistingEPCschemes,goodpractice,shortcomings,andprioritiesforim-provement

2. DevelopmentandtestingofconcreteproposalsandtoolsforenhancedEPCassessment,certificationandverification,aswellasDeepRenovationNetworkPlatforms

3. Adaptationtocountryneedsandimplementationofconsensuselements,aswellasde-velopingaroadmapforfurtherdialogue,and

4. Developmentofasustainabilitystrategyandconclusivepolicyrecommendationsforre-gional,national,andtransnationaldialogue,andtransfer.



WHATISGOINGTOHAPPENDURINGTHEPILOTBUILDINGTESTPHASE?During the QualDeEPC project enhanced assessment and certification schemes for Energy Perfor-manceCertificateswillbedeveloped.Theaimofthepilotbuildingtestphaseistotestthepractica-bilityof theenhancedEPCs.Therefore,at firsta standardEPCwillbedeveloped foryourbuilding.Then,additionally,anenhancedEPCwillbedevelopedforyourbuilding.

Fordoing this,anenergyauditorwill visit the selectedbuilding.Theenergyauditormightneed todiscusscertainissueswiththefacilitymanager/buildingowners,needstocollectinputdataandthenecessaryinformationofthepreparationoftheEPC.

Thiswillnotincuranycostsforyou(anexceptionmightbetheissuanceofanofficialEPC,dependingonnationalcircumstances).

WHYHAVEYOUBEENINVITEDTOPARTICIPATE?Youhavebeeninvitedtoparticipateinthisprojectasyouarethebuildingownerofarepresentativebuilding in your country. Your building matches the criteria developed for a pilot building of theQualDeEPCproject.

WHATKINDOFINFORMATIONWILLBEASKEDFROMYOU?InordertodevelopastandardandanenhancedEPCforyourbuilding,itisnecessarytoreceivetherespective input data. This will include for example metered energy consumption data, technicaldrawings,informationonbuildingsystemetc.

Additionally, youneed toagree toprovideaccess to thebuildingandassistduring thebuilding in-spection.

Furthermore, youneed to complete a feedbackquestionnaire on the assessment and certificationschemebeingused.

WILLYOURDATABEKEPTCONFIDENTIAL?Ingeneral,yourdatawillbeusedtofurtherdevelopconcreteproposalsandtoolsforenhancedEPCs.

All data related topersonal issues (names, addresses, etc.) andyouranswers to thequestionnairewillbeanonymous(unlessyouchoosetoallowustopublishtheaddressofyourbuilding).Buildingdatawillbeanonymisedasfaraspossible,however,thestandardEPCandtheenhancedEPCofyourbuildingwillbepublishedinreportsandontheQualDeEPCwebsite.Photosofthebuildingwillonlybepublishedwithyourpermission.

Yourdatawillbeprocessedbasedon thenational legal standards.More informationondatapro-cessingoftheQualDeEPCprojectcanbefoundatourwebsitewww.qualdeepc.eu.Shouldanyinquir-iesoccur,[email protected].



WHATARETHEPOSSIBLEBENEFITSOFTAKINGPART?AstandardEPCaswellasanenhancedEPCwillbedevelopedforyourbuilding.Bythisyouwillgath-er detailed information on the energy performance of your building and on the possibilities for adeeprenovation.

HOWMUCHTIMEDOYOUNEEDTODEVOTEFORTHEFEEDBACKQUESTIONNAIRE?The feedbackquestionnaire,whichwillbegiven toyouafterwehavemadestandardEPCanden-hancedEPC, isestimated to takeabout30-60minutes. The feedbackquestionnairewill helpus toimprovetheenhancedEPCevenmore.

WHATWILLHAPPENTOTHERESULTSOFTHEPROJECT?

Throughintensivedialogueinvolvingkeyactorsatalllevels,QualDeEPCwillsupportthechangeto

enhancedqualityofEPCs.Onemainobjectiveoftheprojectistoensurethelong-termusageand

integrationoftheprojectresultsinthefutureEPChandling.

WHOISORGANISINGANDFUNDINGTHEPROJECT?TheprojectisfundedbytheEUCommissionundertheHorizon2020researchprogrammeandcoor-dinatedbytheGermanWuppertalInstitut.TheQualDeEPCprojectwillbecarriedoutwithtenpart-nersfromeightdifferentEuropeancountriesoveraperiodofthreeyears.

CONTACTFORFURTHERINFORMATIONIFYOUAREINTERESTEDTOTAKEPARTINTHISPROJECTORHAVEANYQUESTIONSREGARDINGTHISPROJECTPLEASECONTACTUSFORMOREDETAILS:

##pleaseincludeyourcontactinformationandlogo##

Thankyou!!

December2019



4.2 AnnexB:Datatobegatheredforabuilding

Workpackage4

Pilotbuildingdata

No. Parameter Valueofparameter Comments

1. Addressofbuilding Ifthepilotbuildinghasagreedtopublishtheaddressofthe

buildingthenyoushouldgiveexactaddress.

If the pilot building has not agreed to publish the address

you should at least give the information about the city or

regionwherethebuildingissituated

2. Buildingtype Here you should show if the building is residential or non

residential.

For residential buildings you should show if it is a multi

apartment building, single family house, row house, single

apartmentoranyothertypewhatisusedinyourcountry.

For non residential buildings you should show the type of

building(office,school,kindergarten,hospital,e.t.c.)

3. Yearofconstruction Theyearofbuildingconstructionshouldbeshown.

If building consists of older and newer parts it should be

shownhere.

4. Conditionedareaofbuilding,m2 Thisshouldbetheareaforwhichspecificenergyconsump-

tioninbuildingsEPCiscalculated.

ForinstanceinLatviawehaveheatedareaofbuilding.Ias-

sumethatinSpainorGreeceyouwillshowcooledarea.

Itwouldbegoodnotonly to showareabutalsoadd short



4.3 AnnexC.Criteriaforchoosingpilotbuildings

Themain idea for choosingPilot cases (buildings)– try to choosenon-renovatedbuildingswhichtypicallyundergotheprocessofissuingEPCinyourcountry.

Parameter Description Comments

Aim

ChoosepilotbuildingswhereastandardEPCandEnhancedEPCwill

beissued

StandardEPC–EPCpreparedreadytoissuebasedonexist-ingscheme(differentineachprojectcountry).InsomecaseswewillbelookingonalreadyissuedEPCs.Enhanced EPC – experimental EPC prepared ready to issuebased on draft enhanced EPC scheme developed inQualDeEPCproject(assimilaraspossibleforallprojectpart-nercountries).Pilot building – a building or apartment where we gothroughwholeprocessofissuingStandrdEPCandEnhancedEPC.Going through the process of developing an EPC ready toissueforbothstandardEPCsandEnhancedEPCswillhelpusto verify our Enhanced EPC scheme and let us see wherefurtherimprovementsareneeded.

Amountofresi-dentialbuildingstobechosenaspilotbuildings

Optimalamount–8Minimalamount–5

6 of the 8 buildings (75% of buildings) should be a typicalbuilding/apartmentforwhichEPCis issuedinexistingsitua-tion.For instance – if in your country EPCs for residential build-ings are issuedmainly for single family buildings then youshouldchooseaspilotbuildingssinglefamilybuildings. If inyour country EPCs are issued only for apartment buildingsthen as pilot buildings you should choose apartmentbuild-ings.2of the8buildings (25%ofbuildings) shouldbe chosen insuch way that the 8 buildings represent different types ofbuildings. If in your country EPCs are mainly issued forapartmentbuildings,youshouldchooseat least2buildingsthat are not apartment buildings. This need to be done inordertomakeitpossibletodocrosscountrycomparisoninourproject.Deviationsfromoptimalamount(8)shouldbeallowedonlyinseverelackofPilotbuildings.

Amountofnon-residentialbuild-ingstobechosenaspilotbuildings

Optimalamount–7Minimalamount–4

There are many types of non-residential buildings. YoushouldchoosepilotbuildingsaccordingtotypesofbuildingsforwhichEPCsaretypicallyissuedinyourcountry.Onlyweshould try toavoid largebuildings (like large shoppingcen-ters)becauseusually issuingEPCforsuchabuildingtakesa



Parameter Description Commentslotoftimeandresources.For instance – in Latvia EPCs mainly are issued to schoolsandkindergartens.ThereforeinLatviathesewillbethemaintypes of non-residential buildings, which we will try tochooseasapilotbuildings.Forcrosscountrycomparisonyoushouldtrytogetatleast2buildings that are not the most typical building type forwhichEPCsareusuallyissued.Try avoiding buildings with non-residential and residentialpartofthebuilding.Deviationsfromoptimalamount(7)shouldbeallowedonlyinseverelackofPilotbuildings.

Sizeofpilotbuildings–heat-edareaofthe

buildings

• Preferablymorethan50m2forsingle

familybuildings• Preferablymore

than400m2forapartmentsbuild-

ings• Preferablymorethan250m2fornon-residentialbuildings

Theheated(conditioned)areaofthebuildingsshouldbeasshown. Thiswill ensure that there are no very small build-ings.Theminimalareaisnotastrictrequirementbutitwouldbegood if we try to follow it. Deviations from this area re-quirementcanbejustified if inyourcountryEPCsareoftenissuedtosmallerbuildingsorapartments.

Commitmentofthepilotbuild-

ings

Pilotbuildingstake-holders(own-

ers/buildingmanagersorotherinvolvedper-sons)havetocommit(1)tocompleteafeed-backquestionnaireontheassessmentandcertificationschemeand(2)topublishpro-

jectdata

Pilot building stakeholders have to sign a commitment tocomplete a feedback questionnaire of the assessment andcertificationscheme.ThisquestionnairewillbegiventopilotbuildingstakeholdersafterStandardEPCandEnhancedEPCisissuedforapilotbuilding.We would like to publish the Standard EPC and the En-hanced EPC on our website (confidentiality issues will beconsidered).

Availabilityofinputdata

Pilotbuildingsshouldhavemeteredenergyconsumptiondataac-cordingtonationalspe-cificsofhowoftendata

aregathered.

Insomecountriestherewillbemonthlydataforlast3yearswhileinothercountrieswewillhaveonlymetereddatatak-enonceevery3monthsorhalfyear.Mainthingisthatpilotbuildings do have these data available. You should try toavoidpilotbuildingswhichdonothavemeteredenergycon-sumption data. It is allowed also to choose pilot buildingswithnometereddatabutpleasetrytoavoidthesebuildingsifpossible.EvenifinyourcountrymetereddataisnotrequiredtoissueStandardEPCwethinkthatEnhancedEPCwillneed(or liketosee)thesedata.Alsotryavoidingbuildingswithnobuildingplansornoothertechnicalinformation.



Parameter Description Comments

Buildinginspec-tion

Pilotbuildinghastoagreetoperformbuild-

inginspection

During issuingofEPCswewill visit thebuildings. Thereforepilotbuildinghastoprovideaccesstothebuilding.

Stateofthepilotbuildings

Pilotbuildingsshouldbebuildingswhichcan

undergodeeprenova-tion

Alreadyrenovatedbuildingscannotbechosenaspilotbuild-ings.Therehastobepossibilityforadeeprenovationinthebuildings.Also historical buildings should be avoided because thesebuildingsquiteoftencannotundergodeeprenovation.New buildings (built after ~2013) should be avoided sincethesebuildings followstrictbuildingcodesandcannotun-dergodeeprenovation.

Interestfrompublicinstitu-

tions/stakeholders

Thepilotbuildinginidealcaseshouldbeascloseaspossibletoare-aswithlargeamountof

peoplegoingby

Youshouldtrytoavoidchoosingapilotbuildingthatissitu-atedfarfromeverywhere–donotchooseapilotbuildinginthemiddleofwoods.ThiswillhelptomultiplytheeffectofQualDeEPC project. This is not a mandatory requirement(butshouldbetakenintoaccountwhilechoosingPilotbuild-ings).

Whotoinformaboutpossibilitytoapplyasapilot

building

Anyonewhoyoufeelisneeded

Pleaseinformasmanypeopleaspossibleaboutthepossibil-itytoapplyasapilotbuildinginQualDeEPCproject.

TimeframeforchoosingPilot

buildingsFebruary2020

The Pilot buildings have to be chosen by end of February2020(M6oftheproject).By M7 of the project Ekodoma has to deliver D4.1 “Pilotprojectselectionreport”.

TimeframeforissuingEPCs

• StandardEPC–tillAugust2020

• EnhancedEPC–tillDecember2020

We have to issue all Standard EPCs byM12 of the projectandallEnhancedEPCsbyM18oftheproject.



CONSENTFORM

QualDeEPC–HIGH-QUALITYENERGYPERFORMANCEASSESSMENTANDCERTIFICATIONINEUROPEACCELERATINGDEEPENERGYRENOVATION

Pilotbuildingaddress:

__________________________________________________________________________

Pilotbuildingrepresentative(name,surname,position,contactinformation):

__________________________________________________________________________

No. Statement Pleasecheck1. I confirm that the information collected during QualDeEPC project

about the Pilot building can be published (check only one of 1a and 1b):

1a. After it has been anonymised

1b. Together with the building address

2. I confirm that I will complete a feedback questionnaire of the Enhanced EPC assessment and certification scheme

3. I confirm that available energy consumption data, building plans and other information needed about the Pilot building will be shared with QualDeEPC project implementers. I also confirm that the Pilot building will be available for inspection

4. I agree to the use of anonymised quotes in publications

5. I agree that my data and views gathered in this study may be stored (after it has been anonymised) and may be used for future research.

NameofPilotbuildingrepresentative Date Signature



descriptionaboutwhatisincludedinthisarea.

5. Totalareaofbuilding,m2 Total area of building including all building spaces (condi-

tionedandnotconditioned).

6. Descriptionofalreadyimplementedenergy

efficiencymeasures

Pleasshowwhatenergyefficiencymeasureshavebeen im-

plemented (anymeasure thathasbeendoneafterbuilding

construction).Trytousemeasurablevaluesasmuchaspos-

sible (for instance, thickness of insulation, U-values, heat

conductivities,efficienciesofventilationrecuperatione.t.c.)

7. Does the building have an existing EPC

(energyperformancecertificate)

If the building already has an EPC you should mention it

here.Also in this case itwouldbe good to showwhen the

EPC is issued and also add the EPC of the building (if it is

available).

8. Average heat energy consumption, MWh

peryear

Thisdatacouldbeunavailableatthisstageoftheproject.If

thisdataisavailablepleaseshowithere.

9. Averageelectricityconsumption,MWhper

year

Thisdatacouldbeunavailableatthisstageoftheproject.If

thisdataisavailablepleaseshowithere.

10. Shortdescriptionofbuilding Short description of building including various information

aboutbuildingwhichseemsrelevanttoyou.

Iwouldliketoseeinformationaboutnumberoffloors,used

construction materials, what exactly is happening in the

building.Twoorthreesentencesshouldbeenough.

11. Contact details of pilot building repre-

sentative

Pleas showcontactdetails about thepersonwho signs the

consent form (name, surname,position in company, email,

phone,e.t.c.)

12. Other relevant informationwhich you be-

lieveshouldbementioned

Addanyinformation,whichyoubelieveisrelevant


[Deliverablenumberandname] Version1,30/04/20

4.4 AnnexD:Pilotbuildings

No Country Addressofbuilding Residential(R)ornon-residential(N)

Buildingtype Yearofconstruction

Conditionedareaofbuilding,m2

DoesthebuildinghaveanexistingEPC

Averageheatenergyconsumption,MWhperyear

Averageelectricityconsumption,MWhperyear

1 Latvia “Briljanti”,Usma,Ventspilsnovads

R Apartmentbuilding

1981 1253.14 N 152.384 2.195

2 Latvia “Mežrūpnieki”,Ugāle,Ventspilsnovads

N Officebuilding 1956 767.8 N 74.85 92.998

3 Latvia Rūpnīcasiela2,Ugāle,Ventspilsnovads

R Apartmentbuilding

1976 2570.99 N 334.73 375.53

4 Latvia Zasulaukaiela14/14A,Rīga R Apartmentbuilding

1956 1013.1 N 200

5 Latvia Semināraiela2A,Valmiera N Officebuilding 1976 505.27 N 99.888 91.55

6 Latvia Ed.Virzasiela21a,Iecava,Iecavasnov.

N Officebuilding 1974 928.9 N 93.493 14.839

7 Latvia Eksportaiela14,Rīga,LV-1045 R Apartmentbuilding

1958 3197.7 N 540.65 5.11

8 Latvia Skolasiela7.Ogre,Ogresnovads,LV-5001

R Apartmentbuilding

1965 2194.88 N 438.96 21.95

9 Latvia Skolasiela10.Ogre,Ogresnovads,LV-5002

R Apartmentbuilding

1973 3185.06 N 567.86 28.39

10 Latvia Rīgasiela13,Līvāni,Līvānunovads

N Educationalbuilding

1983 1882.1 N 257.17 45.2

11 Latvia Pilsiela1,Mežotne,Mežotnespag.,Bauskasnov.

N Other 1802 2130.2 N 400 60









12 Latvia Pilsiela1,Mežotne,Mežotnespag.,Bauskasnov.

N Other 1802 645.5 N 120 20

13 Latvia PāvilaRozīšaiela4 R Apartmentbuilding

1975 3970.6 N 600

14 Latvia PāvilaRozīšaiela7,Liepa,Leipaspagasts,Priekuļunovads

R Apartmentbuilding

1975 2159.9 N 350

15 Latvia Raņķadambis7k-3,Rīgā R Apartmentbuilding

1962 2174 N 338.7 6.233

16 Sweden Billdal,Sweden R Singlefamilybuilding

2001 180 N 18

17 Sweden Göteborg,Sweden R Apartmentbuilding

1938 1782 Y 240 12

18 Sweden Göteborg,Sweden R Apartmentbuilding

1931 6063 Y 620 36

19 Sweden Kungsbacka,Sweden N Educationalbuilding

1979 Y

20 Sweden Kungsbacka,Sweden N Educationalbuilding

1971 Y

21 Sweden Lindome,Sweden N Officebuilding 2003 1600 N 251

22 Sweden Malmö,Sweden N Officebuilding 1920 9069 Y 1300 500

23 Sweden Mölndal,Sweden R Apartmentbuilding

1964 300 Y 22

24 Sweden VästraFrölunda,Sweden R Singlefamilybuilding

1932 160 N 24









25 Greece 43,Iassonosstr.,17341Ag.Dimitrios-Attiki

R Asingleapartment

1976 75 Y

26 Greece 43,Iassonosstr.,17341Ag.Dimitrios-Attiki

R Asingleapartment

1976 75 Y

27 Greece 93,Alexandreiasstr.,10441Athens-Attiki

R Apartmentbuilding

1998 451.14 Y

28 Greece 88,Str.Makryjiannistr.,15344Gerakas-Attiki

R Asingleapartment

2001 101.13 Y

29 Greece 48,Pindoustr.,18344Moschato-Attiki

R Asingleapartment

1997 78.05 Y

30 Greece 43,V.Hugostr.,10437Athens,Attiki

R Asingleapartment

1961 68 Y

31 Greece 12,Panosstr.,16671Vouliagmeni-Attiki

R Asingleapartment 67.95 Y

32 Greece 1,Marathonosstr.,24400Gargaliani-Messinia

R Asingleapartment

1950 166.37 Y

33 Greece 16thkmMarathonosAve.,15351Pallini-Attiki

N Educationalbuilding 1170.5 Y

34 Greece 16thkmMarathonosAve.,15351Pallini-Attiki

N Educationalbuilding 685 Y

35 Greece Theologou&Ag.Lavrasstr.,15344Gerakas-Attiki


1989 1508.49 Y

36 Greece AfanonIroon&Galinisstr.,15351Pallini-Attiki


1970 548.02 Y

37 Greece AfanonIroon&Galinisstr.,15351 N Educational 1983 325.06 Y









Pallini-Attiki building

38 Greece Iassonos&Odysseosstr.,15344Gerakas-Attiki


1998 1056 N

39 Greece 22b,Feidippidoustr,15351Pallini-Attiki

N Officebuilding 337.43 N

40 Spain CESTONA86,28041Madrid R Apartmentbuilding

1978 2202 Y

41 Spain Garganchón214,(BarriodeAeropuerto),28042MADRID,COMUNIDADDEMADRID

R Apartmentbuilding

1960 999 Y

42 Spain PABLONERUDA142(G),28028MADRID

N Officebuilding 1998 9600 N 1743 1940

43 Spain ROMEOYJULIETA3(B),28028MADRID

N Officebuilding 1998 4000 N 740 662

44 Spain “FUENTESBLANCAS”SCHOOL,ParajeFuentesBlancas.LGFuenteSordo,70,09007Burgos


1971 2875.72 Y 380.6 52.4

45 Spain “FUENTESBLANCAS”NURSINGHOME,ParajeFuentesBlancas.LGFuenteSordo,70,09007Burgos

N Other 1971 7376.21 Y 1039.15 360.3

46 Spain “FUENTESBLANCAS”NURSINGHOMEFORASSISTEDADULTS,ParajeFuentesBlancas.LGFuenteSordo,70,09007Burgos

N Other 1971 8958 Y 1736.4 519.2









47 Spain “SANAGUSTÍN”NURSINGHOME,C/SanAgustín,4bajo,09001Burgos

N Other 1998 3217.6 Y 594.3 201.3

48 Bulgaria 12AGeorgiIkonomovstr.,Plovdiv


1974 1748 Y 171 53.5

49 Bulgaria Trakia,5TsarSvetoslavTerterStrPlovdiv


1978 1690.15 Y 312 57.8

50 Bulgaria 4DunavBlvd.,Plovdiv R Apartmentbuilding

1988 7888.4 Y 258.039 76.972

51 Bulgaria Smolyan;57BulgariaBlvd R Apartmentbuilding

1981 6760 Y 1741 160

52 Bulgaria Smolyan;97BulgariaBlvd N Educationalbuilding

1951 7219 Y 485.557 28.31

53 Bulgaria 67GorazdStr.Vidin N Educationalbuilding

1972 1688.89 Y 232.5 67.585

54 Bulgaria 36GorazdStr.Vidin N Educationalbuilding

1973 1413.58 Y 225 55.7

55 Bulgaria Bononiadistrict,Vidin R Apartmentbuilding

1987 4116.4 Y 480 202.465

56 Bulgaria 2SvetiKirilStr.Vidin R Apartmentbuilding

1983 2119.15 Y 110 138.92

57 Bulgaria N Educationalbuilding 8185.81 Y

58 Bulgaria Vidin N Educationalbuilding

1979 7772.8 Y 381.4 35.6