DAFTAR PUSTAKAetd.repository.ugm.ac.id/downloadfile/97545/potongan/S3-2016...DAFTAR PUSTAKA | 561 Brewer, Nicola M. 1987. Modality and Factivity: One Perspective on the Meaning of

DAFTAR PUSTAKA | 559

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Ädel, Annelie. 2006. Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Adnan, Zifirdaus & I. Zifirdaus. 2005. Merebut Hati Audiens Internasional: Strategi

Ampuh Meraih Publikasi di Jurnal Ilmiah. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Allan, Keith. 1986. Linguistic Meaning. Vols. 1 & 2. London: Routledge & Keegan Paul.

Allan, Keith. 2009. Meaning and speech acts. http://arts.monash.edu.au/linguistics/ staff/kallan-speech-acts.php. Diakses 5/4/2009.

Alley, Michael. 1987. The Craft of Scientific Writing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Alwi, Hasan dkk. 1993. Tata Bahasa Baku Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia.

Atkinson, Dwight. 1996. The Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society of London, 1675-1975: A sociohistorical discourse analysis. Language in Society 25: 333-371.

Atkinson, Dwight. 1999. Scientific Discourse in Sociohistorical Context: The

Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society of London, 1675-1975.

Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Austin, John L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Bach, Ken & Robert M. Harnish. How performatives really work: A reply to Searle. Linguistics and Philosophy 15: 93-110.

Banks, David. 1996. The passive and metaphor in scientific writing. Cuadernos de

Filología Inglesa 5/2: 13-22.

Bazerman, Charles. 1984. Modern evolution of the experimental report in physics: Spectroscopic articles in Physical Review, 1893-1980. Social Studies of Science 14: 163-96.

Bazerman, Charles. 1985. Physicists reading physics: Schema-laden purposes and purpose-laden schema. Written Communication 2/1: 3-23.


Bazerman, Charles. 1988. Shaping Written Knowledge. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.

Bhatia, V.K. 1993. Analyzing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.

Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Biber, Douglas. 1994. An analytical framework for register studies. Dalam Douglas Biber and Edward Finegan (peny.), Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register. New York: Oxford University Press, 31-56.

Biber, Douglas. 1995. Dimensions of Register Variation: A Cross-Linguistic

Comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Biber, Douglas & James K. Jones. 2009. Quantitative methods in corpus linguistics. Dalam Anke Lüdeling and Merja Kytö (peny.), Corpus Linguistics: An

International Handbook. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1286-304.

Biber, Douglas, Stig Johnson, Geoffrey Leech, dkk. 1999. Longman Grammar of

Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.

Biber, Douglas & Susan Conrad. 2009. Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Boland, Annerieke. 2006. Aspect, Tense and Modality: Theory, Typology and

Acquisition. Vol. 1 & 2. Utrecht, The Netherlands: LOT.

Bolsky, Morris I. 1988. Better Scientific and Technical Writing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Booth, Vernon. 1985. Communicating in Science: Writing and Speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Booth, Wayne C. 1974. Modern Dogma and the Rhetoric of Assent. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Bradac, James J. & Richard L. Street Jr. 1989. Powerful and powerless styles of talk: A theoretical analysis of language and impression formation. Research on

Language in Social Interaction 23/1-4: 195-241.

Brett, Paul. 1994. A genre analysis of the results section of sociology articles. English

for Specific Purposes 13/1: 47-59.


Brewer, Nicola M. 1987. Modality and Factivity: One Perspective on the Meaning of

the English Modal Auxiliaries. Leeds, Britania Raya: Universitas Leeds. Disertasi Doktor. Tidak diterbitkan.

Brown, Penelope & Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in

Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brufee, Kenneth A. 1986. Social construction, language, and the authority of knowledge: A bibliographical essay. College English 48/8: 773-90.

Burrough-Boenisch, J. 2002. Culture and Conventions: Writing and Reading Dutch

Scientific English. Utrecht: LOT.

Burrough-Boenisch, J. 2005. NS and NNS scientists’ amendments of Dutch scientific English and their impact on hedging. English for Specific Purposes 24: 25-39.

Butler, Christopher S. 1990. Qualifications in science: Modal meanings in scientific texts. Dalam Walter Nash (peny.), The Writing Scholar: Studies in Academic

Discourse. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 137-70.

Bybee, J. L. and S. Fleischman, S. 1995. Modality in grammar and discourse: an introductory essay. Dalam J. L. Bybee and S. Fleischman (peny.), Modality in

grammar and discourse. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1–14.

Caffi, Claudia. 2007. Mitigation. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Canagarajah, Suresh. 1996. Nondiscursive requirements in academic publishing, material resources of periphery scholars, and the politics of knowledge production. Written Communication 13: 435-472.

Channel, Joanna. 1980. More on approximations: A reply to Wachtel. Journal of

Pragmatics 4: 461-476.

Channel, Joanna. 1990. Precise and vague expression in writing on economics. Dalam Walter Nash (peny.), The Writing Scholar: Studies in Academic

Discourse. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 95-117.

Channel, Joanna. 1994. Vague Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Channel, Joanna. 1999. Vagueness in written English. Modern English Teacher 8/4: 26-30.

Chafe, Wallace. 1986. Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. Dalam Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (peny.), Evidentiality: The Linguistic

Coding of Epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Co., 261-272.


Clemen, Gudrun. 1997. The concept of hedging: Origins, approaches and definitions. Dalam Raija Markkanen & Hartmut Schröder (peny.): 235-248.

Clyne, Michael. 1991. The sociocultural dimension: The dilemma of the German-speaking scholar. Dalam Harmut Schrӧder (peny.), Subject-Oriented Texts:

Languages for Special Purposes and Text Theory. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 49-68.

Coates, Jennifer. 1983. The Semantics of the Modal Auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.

Coates, Jennifer. 1987. Epistemic modality and spoken discourse. Transactions of the

Philological Society 85: 100-31.

Collins, Peter. 2009. Modals and Quasi-modals in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

Cook, C. K. 1985. The MLA's Line by Line: How to Edit Your Own Writing. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Crismore, Avon. 1989. Talking with Readers: Metadiscourse as Rhetorical Acts. New York: Peter Lang.

Crismore, Avon & Rodney Farnsworth. 1990. Metadiscourse in popular and professional science discourse. Dalam William Nash (peny.), The Writing

Scholar: Studies in Academic Discourse. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 118-136.

Crismore, Avon, Raija Markkanen & M. Steffensen. 1993. Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students. Written Communication 10/1: 39-71.

Crismore, Avon & William J. Vande Kopple. 1988. Readers’ learning from prose: The effects of hedges. Written Communication 5/2: 184-202.

Crismore, Avon & William J. Vande Kopple. 1997a. The effects of hedges and gender on the attitudes of readers in the United States toward material in a science textbook. Dalam Anna Duszak (peny.), Culture and Styles of Academic

Discourse. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 223-47.

Crismore, Avon & William J. Vande Kopple. 1997b. Hedges and readers: Effects on attitudes and learning. Dalam Raija Markkanen & Hartmut Schrӧder (peny.): 83-114.

Crompton, P. (1997). Hedging in academic writing: some theoretical problems. English for Specific Purposes 16/4, 271-287.


Crowley, Terry. 2007. Field Linguistics: A Beginner’s Guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Crystal, David & Derek Davy. 1969. Investigating English style. London: Longman.

Cutting, Joan (peny.). 2007. Vague Language Explored. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Cutting, Joan. 2008. Pragmatics and Discourse: A Resource Book for Students (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

Dancygier, Barbara. 2003. Conditionals and Prediction: Time, Knowledge, and

Causation in Conditional Constructions (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Day, R.A. 1998. How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper (5th ed.). Phoenix: Oryx Press.

de Beaugrande, Robert-Alain. & Wolfgang Dressler. 1981. Introduction to Text

Linguistics. London: Longman.

deBakey, Lois. 1976. The Scientific Journal. Editorial Policies and Practices.

Guidelines for Editors, Reviewers, and Authors. St. Louis: The C.J. Mosby Company.

Depraetere, Ilse & Susan Reed. 2006. Mood and modality in English. Dalam Bas Aarts & April McMahon (peny.), The Handbook of English Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell: 269-290.

Djunaidi, Bambang. 2002. Penggunaan Pemagar dalam Percakapan Berita di Radio

Elsinta. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia. Tesis S2. Tidak diterbitkan.

Dӧrnyei, Zoltán. 2007. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Downing, Angela. 2015. English Grammar: A University Course (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.

Downing, Angela & Philip Locke. 2006. English Grammar: A University Course (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

Dubois, Betty L. 1987. ‘Something in the order of around forty to forty-four’: Imprecise numerical expressions in biomedical slide talks. Language in Society 16: 527-41.


Duranti, Alessandro and Charles Goodwin (peny.). 1992. Rethinking Context:

Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Duszak, A. 1994. Academic discourse and intellectual styles. Journal of Pragmatics 21/3: 291– 313.

Eelen, Gino. 2001. A Critique of Politeness Theories. London: Routledge.

Falahati, Reza. 2007. The use of hedging across different disciplines and rhetorical sections of research articles. Dalam Nicole Carter dkk. (peny.), SFU Working

Paper in Linguistics Vol. I: Proceedings of the 22nd

Northwest Linguistic

Conference (NWLC22). Burnaby: Simon Fraser University, 99-112.

Fahnestock, Jeanne. 1986. Accommodating science: The rhetorical life of scientific facts. Written Communication 3/3: 275-96.

Ferguson, Charles. 1983. Sports announcer talk: syntactic aspects of register variation. Language in Society 12: 153–72.

Ferguson, Charles. 1994. Dialect, register, and genre: working assumptions about conventionalization. Dalam Douglas Biber and Edward Finegan (peny.), Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register. New York: Oxford University Press, 15–30.

Fine, Kit. 2005. Modality and Tense: Philosophical Papers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Firth, J.R. 1950. Personality and language in society. Sociological Review 42: 37-52.

Flowerdew, John. 1999. Writing for scholarly publication in English: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing 8/2: 123-45.

Fraser, Bruce. 1975. Hedged performatives. Dalam P. Cole & J. Morgan (peny.), Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, 187-210.

Fraser, Bruce. 2010. Hedging in political discourse: The Bush 2007 press conference. Dalam Urszula Okulska & Piotr Cap (peny.), Perspectives in Politics and

Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamin, 201-13.

Ghadessy, Mohsen (ed.). 1999. Text and Context in Functional Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Gilbert, G. Nigel. 1976. The transformation of research findings into scientific knowledge. Social Studies of Science 6: 281-306.


Gilbert, G. Nigel. 1977. Referencing as persuasion. Social Studies of Science 7.1.: 113-122.

Gilbert, G. Nigel & Michael Mulkay. 1984. Opening Pandora’s Box: A Sociological

Analysis of Scientists’ Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gillaert, Paul & Freek Van de Velde. 2010. Interactional metadiscourse in research article abstracts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9: 128-39.

Givón, Talmy. 1994. The pragmatics of de-transitive voice: Functional and typological aspects of inversion. Dalam Talmy Givón (peny.), Voice and

Inversion. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 3-44.

Gofmann, Erving. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Doubleday.

Gomez, Pascual Cantos. 2002. Do we need statistics when we have linguistics? D.E.L.T.A. 18/2: 233-71.

Grice, Paul H. 1975. Logic and conversation. Dalam P. Cole & J. Morgan (peny.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, 41-58.

Grice, Paul H. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Hacker, D. 2008. Rules for Writers (6th ed.). Boston: Bedford.

Halliday, Michael A.K. 1970a. Language structure and language functions. Dalam John Lyons (peny.), New Horizons in Linguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 140-165.

Halliday, Michael A.K. 1970b. Functional diversity in language as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English. Foundations of Language 6: 322-361.

Halliday, Michael A.K. 1973. Explorations in the Functions of Language. London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, Michael A.K. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation

of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M.A.K. 1985. Language across the Culture. Singapore: SEAMEO RELC.

Halliday, Michael A.K. 1985. Part A. Dalam Michael A.K. Halliday & Ruqaya Hasan, Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic

Perspective. Victoria: Deakin University.


Halliday, Michael A.K. 1988. On the language of physical science. Dalam Ghadessy (peny.), Registers of Written English. London: Pinter, 162-78.

Halliday, Michael A.K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 2nd Ed. London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M.A.K., A. McIntosh, & P. Strevens. 1964. The Linguistic Sciences and

Language Teaching. London: Longman.

Halliday, Michael A.K. & Ruqaya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

Halliday, Michael A.K. & Ruqaya Hasan. 1985. Language, Context and Text:

Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. Victoria: Deakin University.

Halloran, S. Michael. 1984. The birth of molecular biology: An essay in the rhetorical criticism of scientific discourse. Rhetoric Review 3/1: 70-83.

Hare, Richard Mervyn. 1970. Meaning and speech acts. The Philosophical Review 79: 3-24.

Harnish, Robert M. 2007. Performative utterance: Seven puzzles. Lodz Papers in

Pragmatics 3: 3-21.

Hedge, M. N. 1994. A Coursebook on Scientific and Professional Writing in Speech-

Language Pathology. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group Inc.

Hermerén, L. 1978. On Modality in English: A Study of the Semantics of the Modals. Lund, Swedia: CWK Gleerup.

Heslot, J. 1982. Tense and other indexical markers in the typology of scientific texts in English. Dalam J. Høedt, L. Lundquist, H. Picht and J. Qvistgaard (peny.), Pragmatics and LSP: Proceedings of the 3rd European Symposium on LSP. Copenhagen: The Copenhagen School of Economics, 83– 104.

Hewings, Martin & Ann Hewings. 2002. “It’s interesting to note that. . .”: A comparative study of anticipatory ‘it’ in student and published writing. English

for Specific Purpose 21: 367-83.

Hidayati, Farida, Ahsin Muhammad & Ruswan Dallyono. 2008. The use of hedging in academic discourse. Educationist 2/1: 27-37.

Hill, Susan, Betty F. Soppelsa & Gregory K. West. 1982. Teaching ESL students to read and write experimental-research papers. TESOL Quarterly 16/3: 333-47.


Hinkel, Eli. 1997. Indirectness in L1 and L2 academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics

27: 361-386.

Holmes, Janet. 1982. Expressing doubt and certainty in English. RELC Journal 13: 19-28.

Holmes, Janet. 1983. Speaking English with the appropriate degree of conviction. Dalam Christopher Brumfit (peny.), Learning and Teaching Languages for

Communication: Applied Linguistic Perspectives. London: Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research, 100-113.

Holmes, Janet. 1984. Modifying illocutionary force. Journal of Pragmatics 8: 345-365.

Holmes, Janet. 1988. Doubt and certainty in ESL textbooks. Applied Linguistics 9: 21-44.

Holmes, Richard. 1997. Genre analysis, and the social sciences: An investigation of the structure of research article discussion sections in three disciplines. English

for Specific Purpose 16/4: 321-37.

Holmes, Richard. 2001. Variation and text structure: The discussion section in economics research articles. ITL, Review of Applied Linguistics 131– 132: 107– 35.

Holtgraves, Thomas. 2002. Language as Social Action: Social Psychology and

Language Use. London: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

Horn, Laurence R. 2006. Implicature. Dalam Laurence R. Horn & Gregory Ward (peny.), The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell, 3-28.

House, Julianne & Gabriele Kasper. 1981. Politeness markers in English and German. Dalam F. Coulmas (peny.), Conversational Routine. The Hague: Mouton, 157-185.

Hübler, Axel. 1983. Understatement and Hedges in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.

Huckin, Thomas. 2001. Abstracting from abstracts. Dalam Martin Hewings (peny.), Academic Writing in Context: Implications and Applications. Papers in honor

of Tony Dudley-Evans. Birmingham: The University of Birmingham University Press, 93-103.

Huckin, T.N. & L. Olsen. 1983. English for Science and Technology: A Handbook

for Non-Native Speakers. New York: McGraw-Hill.


Huddleston, Rodney. 1984. Introduction to the Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the

English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2005. A Studnet’s Introduction to

English Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hyland, Ken. 1994. Hedging in academic writing and EAP textbooks. English for

Specific Purposes, 13/3: 239-56.

Hyland, Ken. 1996a. Talking to the academy: Forms of hedging in science research articles. Written Communication 13/2: 251-81.

Hyland, Ken. 1996b. Writing without conviction? Hedging in science research articles. Applied Linguistics 17/4: 433-454.

Hyland, Ken. 1998. Hedging in Scientific Research Articles.Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Hyland, Ken. 2000. Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic

Writing. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education Limited.

Hyland, Ken. 2005a. Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies 7/2: 173-92.

Hyland, Ken. 2005b. Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London:Continuum.

Hyland, Ken. 2006. Disciplinary differences: language variation in academic discourses. Dalam Ken Hyland & M. Bondi (peny.), Academic discourse across

disciplines. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 17-45.

Hyland, Ken. 2008. Persuasion, interaction and the construction of knowledge: Representing self and others in research writing. International Journal of

English Studies 8/2: 1-23.

Hyland, Ken & Polly Tse. 2004. Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics 25/2: 156-177.

Hymes, Dell. 1972. Models of the interaction of language and social life. Dalam John J. Gumperz & Dell Hymes (peny.), Directions in Sociolinguistics: The

Ethnography of Communication. New York: Holt, Rineheart & Winston, 35-71.


Hymes, Dell. 1974. Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Hymes, Dell. 1984. Sociolinguistics: stability and consolidation. International

Journal of the Sociology of Language 45: 39–45.

Hymes, Dell. 2008. The ethnography of speaking. Dalam Ian Hutchby (peny.), Methods in Language and Social Interaction Vol. II. Los Angeles: Sage, 1-38.

Johns, Anne M.1993. Written argumentation for real audiences: Suggestions for teacher research and classroom practice. TESOL Quarterly 27: 75-90.

Johns, Tim. 2001. From evidence to conclusion: The case of ‘indicate that’. Dalam Martin Hewings (peny.), Academic Writing in Context: Implications and

Applications. Papers in honor of Tony Dudley-Evans. Birmingham: Birmingham University Press, 55-62.

Jordan, R. R. 1997. English for Academic Purposes: A Guide and Resource Book for

Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kanoksilapatham, Budsaba. 2003. A Corpus-based Investigation of Scientific

Research Articles: Linking Move Analysis with Multidimensional Analysis. Washington, DC: Georgetown University. Disertasi Doktor. Tidak diterbitkan.

Kanoksilapatham, Budsaba. 2005. Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes 24: 269–92

Kaplan, Robert & William Grabe. 1991. The fiction in science writing. Dalam Hartmut Schrӧder (peny.), Subject-Oriented Texts: Languages for Special

Purposes and Text Theory. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 199-217.

Karttunen, Lauri. 1971. Some observations on factivity. Papers in Linguistics 4/1: 55-69.

Kaswanti Purwo, Bambang. 1982. Deiksis dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia. Disertasi Doktor. Tidak diterbitkan.

Kempson, R. 1979. Presupposition, opacity and ambiguity. Dalam C. Oh & D. Dinneen (peny.) Syntax and Semantics Vol. 11. New York: Academic Press, 283-291.

Kennedy, Graeme D. 1987. Expressing temporal frequency in academic English. TESOL Quarterly 21/1: 69-86.

Kiparsky, Paul & Carol Kiparsky. 1970. Fact. Dalam M. Bierwisch and K.E. Heidolph (peny.), Progress in Linguistics. The Hague: Mouton, 143-73.


Klinge, Alex. 1993. The English modal auxiliaries: from lexical semantics to utterance interpretation. Journal of Linguistics 29: 315-357.

Knorr-Cetina, Karin D. 1981. The Manufacture of Knowledge. Oxford: Pergamon.

Kreutz, Heinz. 1997. Some observations on hedging phenomena and modifying devices as regional markers in the speech of young East Germans. Dalam Raija Markkanen & Hartmut Schrӧder (peny.): 208-31.

Kreutz, Heinz & Annette Harres. 1997. Some observations on the distribution and function of hedging in German and English academic writing. Dalam Anna Duszak (peny.), Culture and Styles of Academic Discourse. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 181-201.

Kridalaksana, Harimurti. 2008. Kamus Linguistik (Edisi IV). Jakarta: Gramedia.

Kuhn, Thomas. 1996. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Labov, William & David Fanshel. 1977. Therapeutic Discourse: Psycotheraphy as

Conversation. New York: Academic Press.

Lachowicz, Dobroslaw. 1981. On the use of the passive voice for objectivity, author responsibility and hedging in EST. Science of Science 2/2: 105-14.

Lakoff, George. 1972. Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Chichago Linguistic Society Papers 8: 183-228.

Lakoff, George. 1973. Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Journal of Philosophical Logic 2: 458-508.

Lakoff, Robin. 1990. Talking Power: The Politics of Language in Our Lives. New York: Basic Books.

Lakoff, Robin. 2008. The logic of politeness; or minding your p’s and q’s. Dalam Ian Hutchby (peny.), Methods in Language and Social Interaction Vol. I. Los Angeles: Sage, 41-55.

Larson-Hall, Jennifer. 2010. A Guide to Doing Statistics in Second Language

Research Using SPSS. New York: Routledge.

Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers

through Society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

Latour, Bruno & Steve Woolgar. 1979. Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of

Scientific Facts. Beherly Hills, CA: Sage Publication.


Lee, David Y.W. 2008. Corpora and discourse analysis. Dalam Vijay K. Bhatia, John Flowerdew & Rodney H. Jones (peny.), Advances in Discourse Studies. London: Routledge, 86-99.

Leech, Geoffrey. 1974. Semantics. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. The Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.

Leech, Geoffrey. 1987. Meaning and the English Verbs (2nd Ed.). London: Longman.

Leech, Geoffrey. 2004. Meaning and the English Verbs (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.

Leech, Geoffrey. 2014. The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Levinson, Stephen. 1983. Pragmatics. London: Cambridge University Press.

Lewin, Beverly A. 2005. Hedging: An exploratory study of authors’ and readers’ identification of ‘toning down’ in scientific texts. Journal of English for

Academic Purposes 4: 163-78.

Lim, Jason M. H. 2006. Method sections of management research articles: A pedagogically motivated qualitative study. English for Specific Purposes 25/3: 282– 309.

Lipson, C. 2005. How to Write a BA Thesis: A Practical Guide from Your First Ideas

to Your Finished Paper. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lorés, R. 2004. On RA Abstracts: From rhetorical structure to thematic organisation. English for Specific Purposes 23/3: 280-302.

Low, Graham. 1996. Intensifiers and hedges in questionnaire items and the lexical invisibility hypothesis. Applied Linguistics 17/1: 1-37.

Luukka, Minna-Riitta & Raija Markkanen. 1997. Impersonalization as a form of hedging. Dalam Raija Markkanen & Hartmut Schrӧder (peny.): 168-87.

Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Vols. 1 & 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lysvåg, Per. 1975. Verbs of hedging. Dalam John P. Kimball (peny.), Syntax and

Semantics 4. New York: Academic Press, 125-54.

Malchukov, Andrej & Anna Siwierska. 2011. Introduction. Dalam Andrej Malchukov & Anna Siwierska (peny.), Impersonal Constructions: A Cross-linguistic

Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1-15.


Manser, M. 2006. The Facts on File: Guide to Good Writing. New York: Infobase Publishing.

Marín Aresse, Juana I. 2002. Introduction. Dalam Juana I Marín Aresse (peny.), Conceptualization of Events in Newspaper Discourse: Mystification of Agency

and Degree of Implication in News Reports. Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 1-8.

Markkanen, Raija & Harmut Schrӧder. 1989. Hedging as a translation problem in scientific texts. Dalam Christer Lauren & Marianne Nordman (peny.), Special

Languages: From Human Thinking to Thinking Machines. London: Multilingual Matters, 171-75.

Markkanen, Raija & Harmut Schrӧder. 1992. Hedging and its linguistic realization in English, German and Finnish philosophical texts: A case study. Dalam Marianne Nordman (peny.), Fachsprachliche Miniaturen. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 121-30.

Markkanen, Raija & Harmut Schrӧder. 1997. Hedging: A challenge for pragmatics and discourse analysis. Dalam Raija Markkanen & Hartmut Schrӧder (peny.): 3-18.

Markkanen, Raija & Harmut Schroder (peny.). (1997). Hedging and Discourse:

Approaches to the Analysis of a Pragmatic Phenomenon in Academic Texts. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Martín-Martín, Pedro. 2008. The mitigation of scientific claims in research papers: A comparative study. International Journal of English Studies 8/2: 133-52.

Master, Peter A. 1986. Science, Medicine, and Technology: English Grammar and

Technical Writing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Mauranen, Anna. 1993. Contrastive rhetoric: Metacontext in Finnish-English economic texts. English for Specific Purposes 12: 3-22.

Mauranen, Anna. 1997. Hedging in language revisers’ hands. Dalam Raija Markkanen & Hartmut Schrӧder (peny.): 115-33.

McCloskey, Donald N. 1985. Knowledge and Persuasion in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

MacEnery, Tony & Andrew Wilson. 2001. Corpus Linguistics (2nd Ed.). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.


Melvold, Janis. 1991. Factivity and definiteness. Dalam L.L.S. Cheng & H. Demirdache (peny.), More papers on Wh- movement. MIT Working Papers in

Linguistics, 15. MIT: Cambridge, Mass., 97-117.

Mendelsohn, Everett. 1977. The social construction of scientific knowledge. Dalam Everett Mendelsohn, Peter Weingart & Richard Whitley (peny.), The Social

Production of Scientific Knowledge. Dordrecht, Belanda: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

Merton, Robert. 1973. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical

Investigations. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Mey, Jacob L. 1993. Pragmatics: An Introduction (1st ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.

Mey, Jacob L. 2001. Pragmatics: An Introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.

Meyer, Charles F. 2004. English Corpus Linguistics: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Meyer, Paul G. 1997. Hedging strategies in written academic discourse: Strengthening the argument by weakening the claim. Dalam Raija Markkanen & Hartmut Schrӧder (peny.): 21-41.

Minitab 17 Statistical Software. 2010. [Perangkat lunak komputer]. State College, PA: Minitab, Inc. (www.minitab.com)

Mulkay, Michael. 1979. Science and the Sociology of Knowledge. London: George Allen & Unwin.

Myers, Greg. 1989. The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied

Linguistics 10: 1-35.

Myers, Greg. 1990. Writing Biology: Texts in the Social Construction of Scientific

Knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Myers, Greg. 1992. Textbooks and the sociology of scientific knowledge. English for

Specific Purposes 11: 3-17.

Myers, Greg. 1996. Public understanding of science and the forms of popularizations. Dalam Eija Ventola & Anna Mauranen (peny.), Academic Writing Today and

Tomorrow. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press, 33-44.

Nadar, F.X. 2009. Pragmatik dan Penelitian Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Namsaraev, Vasili. 1997. Hedging in Russian academic writing in sociological texts. Dalam Raija Markkanen & Hartmut Schrӧder (peny.): 64-79.


Nash, Walter. 1990. The stuff these people write. Dalam Walter Nash (peny.), The

Writing Scholar: Studies in Academic Discourse. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 8-30.

Nobelprize.org. The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1962. Nobel Media AB 2014. Web. Diakses 1 September 2015. <http://www.nobelprize.org/ nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/1962/>

Nystrand, Martin. 1983. The role of context in written communication. The

Nottingham Linguistic Circular 12: 55-65.

Palmer, Frank. 1986. Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Palmer, Frank. 1987. The English Verb (2nd ed.). London: Longman.

Palmer, Frank. 1990. Modality and the English Modals (2nd ed.). London: Longman.

Palmer, Frank. 2001. Mood and Modality (2nd Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pauling, Linus & Robert B. Corey. 1953. Structure of the nucleic acids. Nature 171: 346.

Pauling, Linus & Robert B. Corey. 1953. A proposed structure for the nucleic acids. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of

America 39: 84-97.

Peacock, M. 2002. Communicative moves in the discussion section of research articles. System 30/4: 479– 97.

Perkins, Michael. 1983. Modal Expressions in English. London: Frances Pinter.

Pho, Phuong D. 2013. Authorial Stance in Research Articles: Examples from Applied

Linguistics and Educational Technology. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Pinch, Trevor. 1985. Towards an analysis of scientific observation: the externality and evidential significance of observational reports in physics. Social Studies of

Science 15: 3-36.

Pindi, M. & T. Bloor. 1986. Playing save with predictions: Hedging, attribution, and conditions in economic forecasting. Dalam T. Bloor & J Norrish (peny.), Written Language. London: CILT/BAAL, 55-69.

Poedjosoedarmo, Soepomo. 1985. Komponen tutur. Dalam Soenjono Dardjowidjojo (peny.), Perkembangan Linguistik Indonesia. Jarkarta: Arcan, kerja sama dengan Masyarakat Linguistik Indonesia.


Powell, Mava Jo. 1980. Purposive vagueness: An evaluative dimension of vague quantifying expressions. Journal of Linguistics 21: 31-50.

Prince, Ellen F., Joel Frader & Charles Bosk. 1982. On hedging in physician-physician discourse. Dalam R.J. Pietro (peny.), Linguistics and the Professions:

Proceedings of the Second Delaware Symposium on Language Studies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 83-97.

Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1972. A

Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.

Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A

Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.

Rosch, Eleanor. 1973. Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 4: 328-350.

Rosch, Eleanor. 1978. Principles of categorization. Dalam Eleanor Rosch & B. Lloyd (peny.), Cognition and Categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Rundblad, Gabriella. 2008. We, ourselves and who else? Differences in use of passive voice and metonymy for oneself versus other researchers in medical research articles. English Text Construction 1/1: 23-40.

Safnil. 2003. Hedging devices in a written academic discourse: Samples from Indonesian academic texts. Kolita 1. Prosiding Konferensi Linguistik Tahunan

Atma Jaya. Jakarta: Universitas Atma Jaya.

Salager-Meyer, Fancoise. 1994. Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes 13: 149-170.

Salager-Meyer, Fançoise. 1997. I think that perhaps you should: A study of hedges in written academic discourse. Dalam T. Miller (Peny.), Functional Approaches to

Written Discourse: Classroom Applications. Washington, D.C.: United States Information Agency.

Samraj, Betty. 2002. Introductions in research articles: Variations across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes 21/1: 1– 17.

Sanjaya, I Nyoman Suka. 2013. Hedging and Boosting in English and Indonesian

Research Articles. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University. Disertasi Doktor. Tidak diterbitkan.

Schreiber, James & Kimberly Asner-Self. 2011. Educational Research: The

Interrelationship of Questions, Sampling, Design, and Analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.


Schiffrin, Deborah. 1994. Approaches to Discourse. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Scott, M. 2008. WordSmith Tools Version 5. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.

Searle, John. 1969. Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Searle, John. 1976. A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society 5: 1-23.

Searle, John. 1979. Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Shapin, Steven. 1984. Pump and circumstance: Robert Boyle’s literary technology. Social Studies of Science 14: 481-520.

Simpson, Paul. 1990. Modality in literary-critical discourse. Dalam Walter Nash (peny.), The Writing Scholar: Studies in Academic Discourse. Newbury Park, CA: Sage: 63-94.

Sinclair, John. 1991. Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Siwierska, Anna. 2008a. Introduction: Impersonalization from a subject-centred vs. agent-centred perspective. Transactions of the Philological Society 106/2: 1-23.

Siwierska, Anna. 2008b. Ways of impersonalizing: Pronominal vs. verbal strategies. Dalam González, Maria, J. Lachlan Mckenzie, & Elsa Álvarez (peny.), Current

Trends in Contrastive Linguistics: Functional and Cognitive Perspective. Amsterdam: john Benjamins, 3-26.

Sorensen, Roy. 2006. Sharp edges from hedges: fatalism, vagueness and epistemic possibility. Philosophical Studies 131: 607-626.

Skelton, John. 1988a. The care and maintenance of hedges. ELT Journal 42/1: 37-43.

Skelton, John. 1988b. Comments in academic articles. Dalam P. Grunwell (peny.), Applied Linguistics in Society. London: CILT/BAAL, 98-108.

Skelton, John. 1997a. How to tell the truth in the British Medical Journal: Patterns of judgement in the 19th and 20th centuries. Dalam Raija Markkanen & Hartmut Schrӧder (peny.): 42-63.

Skelton, John. 1997b. The representation of truth in academic medical writing. Applied Linguistics 18/2: 121-140.


St. Johns, Maggie Jo. Writing processes of Spanish scientists publishing in English. English for Specific Purposes 6: 113-20.

Stanley, R.M. 1984. The recognition of macrostructure: A pilot study. Reading in a

Foreign Language 2: 156-68.

Strunk, W. Jr. and E. B. White. 2000. The Elements of Style (4th ed.). New York: Pearson.

Stubbs, Michael. 1983. Discourse Analysis: The Sociolinguistic Analysis of Natural

Language. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Stubbs, Michael. 1986. ‘A matter of prolonged field work’: Notes towards a modal grammar of English. Applied Linguistics 7/1: 1-25.

Sudaryanto. 1990. Aneka Konsep Kedataan Lingual dalam Linguistik. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press.

Sudaryanto. 1993. Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa: Pengantar Penelitian

Wahana Kebudayaan secara Linguistis. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press.

Supriyati, Upik. 2002. Penggunaan Pagar Bahasa Inggris dalam Skripsi Sarjana

Perempuan dan Sarjana Laki-Laki. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia. Tesis S2. Tidak diterbitkan.

Swales, J. 1981. Aspects of article introductions. Aston ESP Research Report No. 1. Birmingham, UK: The University of Aston Language Studies Unit. (Mimeo).

Swales, J. 1983. Developing materials for writing scholarly introductions. Dalam R.R. Jordan (peny.) Case Studies in ELT. London: Collins ELT, 188-200.

Swales, John. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Swales, John. 2004. Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Swales, John & Christine Feak. 1994. Academic Writing for Graduate Students: A

Course for Nonnative Speakers of English. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.

Swales, John & Christine Feak. 2004. Academic Writing for Graduate Students:

Essential Tasks and Skills (2nd ed.). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.


Tannen, Deborah. 1982. Ethnic style in male-female conversation. Dalam John J. Gumperz (peny.), Language and Social Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 217-231.

Taylor, R.B. 2005. The Clinician's Guide to Medical Writing. New York: Springer.

Thomas, Jenny. 1995. Meaning in Interaction. London: Routledge.

Thomas, Sarah & Thomas P. Hawes. 1994. Reporting verbs in medical journal articles. English for Specific Purposes 13/2: 129-48.

Thompson, D. K. 1993. Arguing for experimental ‘facts’ in science: A study of research article results sections in biochemistry. Written Communication 10/1: 106– 28.

Thompson, Geoff. & Yiyun Ye. 1991. Evaluation of the reporting verbs used in academic papers. Applied Linguistics 12/4: 365-82.

Thompson, Paul. 2001. A Pedagogically-Motivated Corpus-based Examination of

PhD Theses: Macrostructure, Citation Practices and Uses of Modal Verbs. Reading: Universitas Reading, Britania Raya. Disertasi Doktor. Tidak diterbitkan.

Thomson Reuters. 2010. Arts and Humanities Citation Index. http://ip-science.thomsonreuters.com/mjl/. Diunduh: 12/08/2010.

Thomson Reuters. 2010. Science Citation Index Expanded. http://ip-science.thomsonreuters.com/mjl/. Diunduh: 12/08/2010.

Thomson Reuters. 2010. Social Science Citation Index. http://ip-science.thomsonreuters.com/mjl/. Diunduh: 12/08/2010.

Trnac, Radoslava. 2006. Aspect and Subjectivity in Modal Constructions. Utrecth: LOT.

Turnbull, William & Karen L. Saxton. 1997. Modal expression as facework in refusals to comply with requests: I think I should say ‘no’ right now. Journal of

Pragmatics 27/2: 145-181.

Ure, Jean. 1982. Introduction: approaches to the study of register range. International

Journal of the Sociology of Language 35: 5−23.

van Aertselaer, JoAnne N. 2002. Metaphor and metonymy in the representation of agency. Dalam Juana I Marín Aresse (peny.), Conceptualization of Events in

Newspaper Discourse: Mystification of Agency and Degree of Implication in

News Reports. Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 89-103.


Van der Auwera, J. and V.A. Plungian. 1998. Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic

Typology 2, 79–124.

Van Dijk, Teun. 2008. Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Van Dijk, Teun. 2009. Society and Discourse: How Social Contexts Influence Text

and Talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Van Dijk, Teun. 2014. Discourse and Knowledge: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Vande Kopple, William J. 1985. Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication 36/1: 82-93.

Vande Kopple, William J. & Avon Crismore. 1990. Readers’ reaction to hedges in a science textbook. Linguistics and Education 2: 303-22.

Varttala, Teppo. 1999. Remarks on the communicative functions of hedging in popular scientific and specialist research articles on medicine. English for

Specific Purposes 18/2: 177-200.

Varttala, Teppo. 2001. Hedging in Scientifically Oriented Discourse: Exploring

Variation according to Discipline and Intended Audience. Tampere, Finlandia: Universitas Tampere. Disertasi Doktor. Tidak diterbitkan.

Vassileva, Irena. 1997. Hedging in English and Bulgarian academic writing. Dalam Anna Duszak (peny.), Culture and Styles of Academic Discourse. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 203-21.

Vassileva, Irena. 2001. Commitment and detachment in English and Bulgarian academic writing. English for Specific Purposes 20: 83-102.

Vass, Holly. 2004. Socio-cognitive aspects of hedging in two legal discourse genres. Iberica 7: 125-41.

Vendler, Zeno. 1972. Res Cogitans: An Essay in Rational Psychology. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Verschueren, Jeff. 1999. Understanding Pragmatics. London: Edward Arnold.

Wachtel, Tom. 1980. Pragmatic Approximations. Journal of Pragmatics 4: 201-211.

Watson, James D. 2001. The Double Helix: A Personal Account of the Discovery of

the Structure of DNA. New York: Touchstone.


Watson, James D. & Francis H.C. Crick. 1953. A structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acids. Nature 171: 737-38.

Webber, Pauline. 1994. The function of questions in different medical journal genres. English for Specific Purposes 13/3: 257-68.

Wierzbicka, Anna. 1986. Precision in vagueness: The semantics of English ‘Approximatives’. Journal of Pragmatics 10: 579-614.

Wijana, I Dewa Putu. 1996. Dasar-Dasar Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.

Williams, I. A. 1999. Results sections of medical research articles: Analysis of rhetorical categories for pedagogical purposes. English for Specific Purposes 18/4: 347– 66.

Wilson, S.R., Aleman, C.G., & Leathan, G.B. (1998). A revised analysis of face-threatening acts and application to seeking compliance with same-sex friends. Human Communication Research 25: 64–96.

Woodford, F.B. (peny.). 1976. Scientific Writing for Graduate Students. Tanpa tempat publikasi: Council of Biology Editors.

Woolgar, Steve. 1988. Science: The Very Idea. London: Routledge.

Yang, Ruiying & Desmond Allison. 2003. Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving from results to conclusions. English for Specific Purposes 22/4: 365– 85.

Yang, Ruiying & Desmond Allison. 2004. Research articles in applied linguistics: Structures from a functional perspective. English for Specific Purposes 23/3: 264– 79.

Yule, George. 1996. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Zadeh, Lotfi A. 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8: 338-353.

Zuck, Joyce Gilmour & Louis V. Zuck. 1985. Hedging in newswriting. Dalam A-M. Cornu, J. Vanparijs, M. Delahaye & L. Baten, Beads or Bracelet? How Do We

Approach LSP? Leuven: Oxford University Press.

Documents

DAFTAR PUSTAKAetd.repository.ugm.ac.id/downloadfile/97545/potongan/S3-2016...DAFTAR PUSTAKA | 561 Brewer, Nicola M. 1987. Modality and Factivity: One Perspective on the Meaning of