2

Click here to load reader

Damian v. Damian 2015 Guam 12 (Press Release)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • SUPREME COURT OF GUAM Guam Judicial Center, Suite 300 120 West OBrien Drive Hagta, Guam 96910

    Telephone: (671) 475-3162 Facsimile: (671) 475-3140 Web site: http://www.guamsupremecourt.com

    E-mail: [email protected]

    ____________________________________________________________________________________________________

    PRESS RELEASE

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE April 14, 2015 Today, the Supreme Court of Guam

    issued an opinion in the case Damian v. Damian, 2015 Guam 12. The appeal concerns the trial

    courts grant of summary judgment, quieting title to a property whose ownership was disputed

    among family members.

    In 2004, the owner of a property, Roy T. Damian (Roy), transferred title to the property

    to his brother, Plaintiff-Appellee Richard T. Damian (Richard), by quitclaim deed. In 2005,

    Roy agreed to dispose of the property through a dissolution of marriage settlement with his ex-

    wife, which purported to create a remainder interest in the property to Roys son, Defendant-

    Appellant Joshua Camacho Damian (Joshua). Roy died in 2006. In 2007, the domestic court

    enforced the dissolution agreement, ruling that Joshua was now entitled to the property. In the

    underlying action, Richard brought an action to quiet title to the property based on the fact that

    he received legal title to the property prior to any agreements between the man and his wife or

    any judgments by the domestic court. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of

    Richard. Joshua appealed this decision, which the Supreme Court of Guam now affirms.

    Todays opinion first holds that the trial court did not err in its finding that the property

    was separate property that Roy was free to transfer without the consent of his spouse because he

    received the property as a devise of separate property from his mothers estate. The opinion also

    holds that the domestic court may not take jurisdiction over the separate property of a spouse in

  • dissolution of marriage proceedings except as where specifically provided by law. Finally, the

    opinion holds that the trial court did not err in determining that Richards previously recorded

    quitclaim deed was superior to a later recording of title under Guams race-notice statute, and

    that the doctrine of res judicata does not preclude Richard from bringing the underlying action to

    quiet title.

    For more information, please contact Joshua Tenorio at 475-3278.