Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
Dark Matter and its Detection Lectures at
SERC School on Experimental High Energy Physics,
NISER, Odisa
Pijushpani BhattacharjeeSaha Inst. of Nuclear Physics
Kolkata
Lecture-1: Introduction & Overview
2Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
Organization of the lectures
Lecture 1 : Introduction and broad Overview
Lecture 2/Tutorial : Decoupling and thermal freeze out; calculation of the cosmological relic abundance of weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs) from the early Universe
Lecture 3 : Basic phenomenology of direct detection of WIMP candidates of Dark Matter
3Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
Some (astronomical) Units
4Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
Parsec:
5Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
Edwin Hubble and the Expanding Universe
6Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
Basic Equations of Cosmology
7Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
Hot Big Bang Scenario● The Universe was hotter and denser in the past. Evidence:
The Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR).
● At very early times, matter content of the Universe was in
the form of “fundamental” particles : quarks, & leptons. There were no protons, neutrons, nuclei, and atoms. Those gradually appeared as the Universe expanded and cooled.
● Formation of galaxies and other structures, and anisotropies in CMBR, require the presence of some kind of very weakly interacting matter – Dark Matter
8Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
9Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
Evidence for Dark Matter(Basic qualitative ideas)
10Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
The “Visible” Universe
Source: Unknown (Web)
11Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
Is what we “see” all that is there in the Universe?
Evidently, No! (If Newton/Einstein-ian dynamics is valid on all length scales of interest)
Mass discrepancyTotal gravitating mass in a system estimated from dynamical considerations (for example, from studying the motions of visible objects in the system)
the total masses of the “visible” matter/objects in the system
12Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
To explain the formation of structures in the expanding Universe that we “see”, we need a lot of additional matter that we don't see! DARK MATTER! – What is it? Is it just normal matter in the form of objects that are too faint to see (e.g., planets, gas, black holes, neutron stars,...) or a completely new kind of fundamental particles?
– Where is it? Is it only in certain places/objects in the Universe, or is it ubiquitous?
– How much of it? Uniformly distributed or in clumps?
– How do we, or can we at all, detect it in some controlled experiments? …. ?
13Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
Can't see Dark Matter. Know it's presence only through it's
Can't directly `see' Dark Matter
Know its presence only through its gravitational influence on visible matter
14Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
Oort (1932) …
Jan Hendrik Oort (1900-1992)To explain the kinematics of vertical motion of the disk stars, Oort needed “invisible mass” of density ~ 2 GeV / cc at the solar neighborhood.Modern value ~ 0.3 Gev / cc
We know now that Oort's “invisible” mass mostly consisted of objects too faint to “see”.But the idea was correct.
15Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
“Discovery” of Dark MatterFritz Zwicky (1933)
Fritz Zwicky (1898 - 1974)
F. Zwicky, "Die Rotverschiebung von extragalaktischen Nebeln", Helvetica Physica Acta 6: 110–127 (1933)
F. Zwicky, "On the Masses of Nebulae and of Clusters of Nebulae", Astrophysical Journal 86: 217 (1937)
16Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
Rotation Curves of Galaxies
M(r) increases proportionally to r even beyond the visible edge of the galaxy!
– hints to presence of large amount of invisible mass beyond the visible galaxy.
Vera Rubin (1928 - 2016)
17Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
Density fluctuations grow too little too late without non-baryonic Dark Matter
(Source: Web)
18Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
Growth of fluctuations and formation of galaxies/clusters
(Source: Web)
19Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
Cosmic Microwave Background
● The most perfect Blackbody ever known and measured
● Temperature fluctuations carry info about the total amount of matter and amount of baryonic matter in the Universe
20Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
Other evidences
● (Strong) Gravitational lensing ● Bullet cluster● . . .
21Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
“Bullet cluster”: Collision of clusters of galaxies
Images: NASA
22Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
Planck 2015
Parameters of the Universe
23Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
Dark Matter in the Milky Way (“The Galaxy”)
● Rotation curve● Kinematics of vertical motion of disk stars● Dynamics of the globular clusters and dwarf spheroidal satellites of the
Milky way ● High velocity stars ● . . .
24Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
(Re)constructing the RC of Milky WayFor a particle in a circular orbit
* Measure v_c(r), get total M(r). Not so simple!
* Stars on the disk have approximately circular orbits. But stars beyond the disk (> 30 kpc) have non-circular orbits. Also, there are not many tracer stars beyond the disk. Use 21cm line emission from atomic H as tracer.
*Also, you only measure the line-of-sight component of the velocity.
*Thus the RC, is not directly measured.It has to be (re)constructed from l.o.s. velocity data
25Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
Rotation Curve of the Milky Way
PB, S.Chaudhury, S. Kundu, ApJ (2014)
26Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
Dark Matter in the Galaxy
PB, S.Chaudhury, S. Kundu (2017)
27Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
Dark Matter Density near the Solar System
28Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
Candidates for Dark Matter
29Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
Can Dark Matter in the Galaxy's Halo be some too-faint-to-see compact objects, such as stellar mass Black Holes, Neutron Stars, Planets (like Jupiter), PBHs?
MACHOS (Massive Compact Halo Objects)?
MACHOS can do gravitational microlensing – temporary brightening of stars
Probability of microlensing 1 in million years per star
Observe millions of stars
Only a small fraction of DM as MACHOs allowed (depends on the total halo mass)
30Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
Fundamental particle candidates of DM
● Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs)● Axion-like particles (ALPs)● . . .
31Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
The WIMP `Miracle'DM must be non-baryonic, and can have only very weak interaction with SM particles
Clustering on (sub)Galactic scales => 'cold', i.e., massive, and hence non-relativistic
Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs)
In the sufficiently early universe, WIMPs would be in
thermal equilibrium due to thermal production by
collision of, and annihilation into, SM particles:
In thermal equilibrium,
If thermal equilibrium prevailed till today, present-day abundance would be negligible! But, ...
32Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
The WIMP Miracle …
Annihilation rate
since
But expansion rate So, at some T=T_f, at which
the species “freezes out” or “decouples” and leaves the exponentially falling abundance curve
Present -day abundance:
(Details in Tutorial)
33Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
34Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
35Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
Direct detection : Order-of-magnitude estimates
36Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
37Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
38Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
39Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
40Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
41Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
(From: PB, S.Chaudhury, S. Kundu, S. Majumdar, PRD (2013))
42Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
43Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
Annual Modulation:DAMA Expt.
44Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
Detection Strategies
The energy deposited by WIMP-induced nuclear recoil in the detector medium manifests as light (scintillation), sound (acoustic waves/phonons) and charge (ionization)
45Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
46Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
Background Signal
Signal and Background
47Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
Go Underground to reduce Cosmic Ray Background
J. Formaggio and C. Martoff, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 54 (2004) 361
48Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
Exclusion Curves (spin-independent interaction)
Row 1 Row 2 Row 3 Row 40
2
4
6
8
10
12
Column 1Column 2Column 3
P. Cushman et al, arXiv:1310.8327
49Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
Exclusion Curves: Spin-independent interactions
Aprile et al (XENON100) 2013
Xenon1T collab. PRL 119 (2017) 181301 PandaX-II collab. PRL 119 (2017) 181302
50Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
Exclusion Curves: Spin-dependent interactions
Amole et al (PICO) PRL 2015Aprile et al (XENON100) 2013
(SINP)
51Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
INDIRECT DETECTION
AMS-02: Positron excess in Galactic CRFERMI-LAT: Gamma rays from WIMP annihilation in dwarf Spheroidal satellites of Milky WaySuper-K, ICECUBE: Neutrinos from WIMP annihilation in Sun…
52Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
Whither WIMP Direct Detection?
Courtesy: Viktor Zacek (adapted from R. Gaitskell)
53Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
Ultimate Background: The Neutrino “Floor”
Cushman et al, arXiv:1310.8327
DM detectors will start detecting astrophysical neutrinos through Coherent Neutrino-NucleusElastic Scattering (SM process)!
54Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
Detecting SN neutrino with DM detectorsusing Coherent neutrino-nucleus Elastic Scattering
55Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
● Use scintillator crystal as detector material
● Proposed to be done in 2 stages :
– MiniDINO : 1 ---> 10 kg active mass expt. at UCIL Jaduguda mine (SINP, UCIL, BARC, NISER, TIFR, VECC, …. )
– DINO : > 100 kg expt. @ future INO cavern
Dark-matter at INO (DINO)
56Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
Jaduguda Underground Science Laboratory (JUSL) (Inaugurated on September 2, 2017)
For carrying out background studies towards a Dark Matter (or other rare event) search experiment
57Pijushpani Bhattacharjee 15 Nov 2017SERC School-EHEP, NISER
Rig Veda (1st Millenium B.C.)
THANK YOU !
Slide 1Slide 2Slide 3Slide 4Slide 5Slide 6Slide 7Slide 8Slide 9Slide 10Slide 11Slide 12Slide 13Slide 14Slide 15Slide 16Slide 17Slide 18Slide 19Slide 20Slide 21Slide 22Slide 23Slide 24Slide 25Slide 26Slide 27Slide 28Slide 29Slide 30Slide 31Slide 32Slide 33Slide 34Slide 35Slide 36Slide 37Slide 38Slide 39Slide 40Slide 41Slide 42Slide 43Slide 44Slide 45Slide 46Slide 47Slide 48Slide 49Slide 50Slide 51Slide 52Slide 53Slide 54Slide 55Slide 56Slide 57