DATA BOOK COVER SHEET

1

State Aid

2

$2,035,970,233

$1,977,049,484

$1,894,269,216

$1,816,091,355 $1,816,091,355

$1,837,570,779

FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014

Total State Appropriations for Financial Support of Schools

(Formula) FY2009-FY2014

3

654,511

681,578

640,000

645,000

650,000

655,000

660,000

665,000

670,000

675,000

680,000

685,000

2009 2013

Num

ber o

f Stu

dent

s Statewide Student Enrollment

2009 and 2013

Source: Office of Accreditation Annual Student Count.

4

Hispanic 15%

American Indian 15%

Asian 2%

Black 9% Hawaiian or

Pacific Islander 0.28%

White 52%

Two or More Races

7%

Student Demographics by Race 2013

5

PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS IN POVERTY

41%

59%

2009 Above Poverty Line Below Poverty Line

38%

62%

2013 Above Poverty Line Below Poverty Line

6

Revenues and Expenditures

7

$3,275.60

$3,210.05

$3,113.40

$3,040.20 $3,035.00

$2,850.00

$2,900.00

$2,950.00

$3,000.00

$3,050.00

$3,100.00

$3,150.00

$3,200.00

$3,250.00

$3,300.00

$3,350.00

FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013

Per Pupil Funding

8

$7.11

$7.61

$7.80 $7.93

$8.11 $8.22

$6.40

$6.60

$6.80

$7.00

$7.20

$7.40

$7.60

$7.80

$8.00

$8.20

$8.40

FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013

Billi

ons

Statewide Revenue All Funds to Schools FY2008-FY2013

Revenue All FundsSource: Districts' OCAS expenditures and revenue submission. 9

$480.6 $527.3

$638.4

$565.1

$729.0 $769.2

$-

$100

$200

$300

$400

$500

$600

$700

$800

$900

FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013

Mill

ions

School District Carryover Funds

FY2008-FY2013 Reported by districts through OCAS

10

$7.1 $7.6 $7.8 $7.9 $8.1 $8.2

$5.7 $5.9 $6.0 $6.0 $6.2 $6.3

$-

$1.00

$2.00

$3.00

$4.00

$5.00

$6.00

$7.00

$8.00

$9.00

FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013

Billi

ons

Statewide Revenue and Expenditures All Funds

Reported by districts through OCAS

Revenue All Funds Expenditures All Funds 11

Local 25%

Intermediate 2%

State 33%

Federal 9%

Cash forward and other

miscellaneous revenue

31%

Statewide Revenue by Category FY2013

*Miscellaneous revenues include estopped warrants, prior year lapsed appropriations, and non-revenue receipts such as return of assets, transfers and correcting entries

Source: Districts' OCAS expenditures and revenue submission.

$ 8,217,453,398.53

12

Instruction 44%

Support Services

28%

Administration 10%

Other** 18%

Statewide District Expenditures by Category FY2013

** Other expenditures include facilities acquisition and construction, fund transfers and reimbursements, debt service and indirect cost

Source: Districts' OCAS expenditures and revenue submission. 13

Public School Activities

14

ACTIVITY FY 14 appropriation - program detail

FY 2014 Appropriation Total

FY 15 budget request program detail (funding

increases in bold)

FY 15 budget request Total (funding increases

in red)

Alternative Education 14,027,366 17,677,366

Oklahoma Technical Assistance Center 300,000 300,000

Alt Center ( Moved under School Reforms Competitive Grants Pool) 350,000

Statewide school programs 14,677,366 17,377,366

ALTERNATIVE EDUCATION

15

ACTIVITY FY 14 appropriation - program detail

FY 2014 Appropriation Total

FY 15 budget request program

detail (funding increases in

bold)

FY 15 budget request Total

(funding increases in

red)

Education Leadership Oklahoma 14,942,350 14,942,350

National Board Teacher Bonus 11,695,000 11,695,000

*Speech Pathologists and Audiologists 3,247,350 3,247,350

NATIONAL BOARD CERTIFICATION

Attorney General Opinion *

16

FLEXIBLE BENEFIT ALLOWANCE

ACTIVITY FY 14 appropriation - program detail

FY 2014 Appropriation Total

FY 15 budget request program

detail (funding increases in bold)

FY 15 budget request Total

(funding increases in red)

Flexible Benefit Allowance 367,780,862 426,943,017

Certified Personnel 244,347,203 275,423,849

Support Personnel 123,433,659 151,519,168

17

$281,080,625

$297,500,348 $290,557,603

$299,752,899

$340,808,117 $353,012,487

$371,911,268

$435,226,344

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Flexible Benefit Allowance: FY08-14 Actual and FY15 Allocation (District Certified and Support Staff) $426,943,017

18

ACTIVITY FY 2014 Appropriation Total FY 15 budget request Total (funding increases in red)

Teachers Retirement System 35,311,375

35,311,375

School Lunch Matching & MOE 4,960,288

5,074,365

Oklahoma Arts Institute 350,000

350,000

Personal Financial Literacy 150,000

150,000

AG in the Classroom 38,675

39,000

PASS-THROUGH FUNDS

19

IMPLEMENTATION OF REFORMS

• Reading Sufficiency

• Achieving Classroom Excellence

• Teacher & Leader Effectiveness

• School Turnaround

20

Line Item

FY 14 appropriation - program detail

FY 15 budget request for

program

Reading Sufficiency 6,500,000

16,091,550

3rd Grade Reading Readiness Support Teams 500,000

500,000

REAC3H Coaches 4,250,000

5,000,000

21

$6.33

$7.36

$4.71

$1.83

$4.92

$7.44 $7.04

$2.69

$3.99 $3.37

$-

$1.00

$2.00

$3.00

$4.00

$5.00

$6.00

$7.00

$8.00

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Mill

ions

Reading Sufficiency Programs:

State Budget and District Expenditures 2009-2013

State Budget (Revenue) District ExpendituresSource: Districts' OCAS expenditures and revenue submission. 22

FILLING IN THE MISSING PIECES WITH EARLY INTERVENTION IS CRITICAL.

Children who have reading problems in 3rd grade have reading problems in later grades. They fall further

behind each year they do not receive support.

More than 1/3 of poor children enter formal

kindergarten classes already behind their peers…

By 4thgrade, more than

50% of these children will not meet the standard for

reading proficiency. 23

THE DOUBLE JEOPARDY OF STRUGGLING READERS

Children who are not reading proficiently in 3rd grade are 4 times more likely to not graduate high school

Below basic readers are almost 6 times more likely than proficient readers to not finish high school on time

Poor Black and Hispanic students who are struggling readers are about 8 times more likely than proficient readers to drop out of high school

-- The Annie E. Casey Foundation 24

25

26

REAC3H COACHES

27

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%

Which of the following activities did your Coach offer?

Superintendents Princpals TeachersPrincipals

Coaches Offered a Wide Variety of Activities

28

Many Respondents Thought Coaches Will Help Improve Literacy Rates

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Yes Maybe No Not sure

Do you think that information and PD your Coach provided will help you to improve literacy rates?

Superintendents Principals Teachers

29

Overall Satisfaction with the Coaches was Extremely High

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

Better thanexpected

As expected Worse thanexpected

How would you rate your overall satisfaction with your REAC3H Coach?

Superintendents Principals Teachers

30

COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS

Line Item FY 14 appropriation FY 15 budget request

ACE Remediation 8,000,000 21,795,840 AP Teacher training and Test Fee Assistance,

AVID & NMSI 4,150,000 5,743,600

Oklahoma Academic Standards Implementation 564,000 564,000

STEM Ready Elem Schools 300,000 300,000

Think Through Math 1,800,000 2,400,000

Achieving Classroom Excellence

$7.30

$8.45 $8.80

$7.73

$6.79 $5.86

$6.43 $6.85

$2.80 $3.00

$-

$1.00

$2.00

$3.00

$4.00

$5.00

$6.00

$7.00

$8.00

$9.00

$10.00

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Mill

ions

ACE Remediation:

State Budget and District Expenditures 2009-2013

State Budget (Revenue) District ExpendituresSource: Districts' OCAS expenditures and revenue submission. 32

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

FY2012 FY2013 FY2014

Number of Schools Participating in the National Math and Science Initiative

(NMSI) 65% increase in enrollment from FY13 to FY14

33

AP AND AVID

19 AP trainings were held in 6 regions across the state this fall 2 Summer Advanced Placement Institutes will be held this summer for Oklahoma educators.

34

AP & AVID DATA

14,443 students are taking AP exams with 11, 436 passing exams with a score 3, 4, or 5 40 schools in the state now offer AVID--Advancement Via Individual Determination, a proven program for increasing College and Career Readiness

35

THINK THROUGH MATH

IMPLEMENTATION METRICS

COUNT

Districts

282

Schools 672 Student Accounts 50,244

Lessons Completed 435,472 Problems

Completed 8,491,702

36

2012–2013 OCCT ACE END-OF-INSTRUCTION RESULTS

Subject % Proficient

2013

Change in % Proficient from 2012

Algebra I 84 +2%

Algebra II 77 +3%

Geometry 83 +1% English II 88 +2% English III 90 +5%

37

OKLAHOMA ACADEMIC STANDARDS

38

PARTICIPATION BY REAC3H REGION

Prepared by the Office of Policy Implementation

DISTRICT ATTENDANCE Overall Percentage of Districts with at Least One Representative in Attendance (Fall 2013)

*545 Local Education Agencies were represented including districts and charters

224 (41%)

321 (59%)

AttendeesNo Attendees

Prepared by the Office of Policy Implementation

RATING OF “YOUR DISTRICT’S LEVEL OF IMPLEMENTATION” OF THE OKLAHOMA ACADEMIC STANDARDS

Advanced 5%

Substantial 52%

Moderate 38%

Minimal 5%

District Level of Implementation

41

TEACHER AND LEADER

EFFECTIVENESS

42

TEACHER AND LEADER EFFECTIVENESS Line Item

FY 14 appropriation - program detail

FY 15 budget request program detail (funding increases in

bold)

TLE Development of Value Added Component 2,000,000

2,000,000

Staff Development for Schools 4,250,000

4,250,000

Teach for America 2,500,000

2,500,000

43

HOW FAR HAVE WE COME? (2013) 1. Qualitative Model Operational (50%)

2. Roster Verification training sessions; 18 districts fully

participated in voluntary pilot; 52 districts partially participated in voluntary pilot

3. Implemented OAM Pilot (Other Academic Measure)

4. Collected input from Educators on Value Added Models and Non-Tested Grades and Subjects

44

HOW FAR HAVE WE COME? (2013)

5. Continued TLE professional development

• REAC3H Summit, REAC3H Regionals, Vision 2020

• Videoconferences and webinars • Site visits at request of districts, county

cooperatives, and other collaborative organizations

6. Finalized majority of decisions for Value-Added Model

45

WHAT ARE THE NEXT STEPS FOR 2014?

1.Finalize decisions for Student Academic Growth/Teachers of Non-Tested Grades and Subjects

2.Finalize additional decisions for Value-Added Model

3.Collect data from 2012-2013 Observational Frameworks (50%)

4.Continue implementation and monitoring of Roster Verification to collect VAM/SAG data (35%)

46

WHAT ARE THE NEXT STEPS FOR 2014?

5. Collect data from Other Academic Measure pilot year (15%)

6. Create TLE Dashboard and begin implementation with pilot districts

7. Develop and distribute TLE Implementation handbook

8. Continue providing differentiated professional learning opportunities for teachers and leaders

47

School Turnaround

48

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT FROM FY2013-FY2014

Priority • 12 schools came off the list • Of this, 4 are now Reward

Schools

C3 Schools (lowest performing of the bottom 5%)

• 4 out of 11 now have an A, B, or C

Targeted Intervention

• 17 schools came off the list

• Of this, 5 are now Reward Schools

Focus • 10 schools originally

designated Focus due to low performance in student sub-groups are now Reward Schools

49

ACCOUNTABILITY

50

TESTING

Line Item

FY 14 appropriation - program detail

FY 15 budget request program detail

(funding increases in bold)

Testing 3,000,000

3,000,000

51

OCCT General Assessments for Grades 3–8 2013

Grade Math Reading Science Geography

Social Studies/

U.S. History

Writing

Grade 3

Grade 4

Grade 5

Grade 6

Grade 7

Grade 8

Federal and State mandated tests State mandated tests 52

OCCT General Assessments End-of-Instruction

2012 – 2013

ACE Algebra I

ACE English

II

ACE Biology I

ACE U.S.

History

ACE Algebra

II

ACE Geometry

ACE English III

Federal and State mandated tests 53

Preparation for Assessments

Surveys to determine Hardware and Bandwidth Speed Test to identify district capabilities and deficits' Partnership with OMES to find solutions Weekly phone calls with vendors Trainings being offered both in person and webinars

54

OKLAHOMA STUDENT INFORMATION SYSTEM

Line Item

FY 14 appropriation - program detail

FY 15 budget request program detail (funding

increases in bold)

Oklahoma Student Information System 2,000,000

2,000,000

55

THE “WAVE” (JULY 2011)

56

“We were not permitted to use WAVE data in the prior administration.

-SDE Employee

1/22/2014 57

Oklahoma Office of Management and Enterprise Services

The Wave Now

MORE DISTRICTS ARE USING WAVE SYSTEM*

15.0%

23.7%

56.8%

4.1% 0.4%

October 2012

All 14

Missing1Missing2-5Missing6-10MissingAll

83.0%

12.4%

4.5% 0.2%

June 2013

All 14

Missing1Missing2-5MissingAll

* There are 20 Wave Objects (data groups) that districts submit to the SDE. Of these 20, 14 are critical as they are required to populate the Early Warning Indicators System – a tool that identifies students who are at risk of dropping out of school. The SDE monitors Wave communications from districts and has worked with districts and their vendors to improve communications and increase the number of districts sending data to

the SDE through the Wave. 58

SCHOOL REFORMS COMPETITIVE GRANT FUNDS

Line Item

FY 14 appropriation

- program detail

FY 15 budget request program

detail (funding increases in bold)

School Reforms Competitive Grants Pool 3,150,000 3,150,000

Robotics: Kiss (Botball) $75,000

Robotics: First $70,000

OK A+ Schools $275,000

Payne Ed. Center: PK-3 $175,000

Great Expectation $1,050,000

Science Fair: ECU $50,000

OKAGE (Social Studies) $200,000

Catapult Learning (Literacy First) $445,000

Street School $185,000

OSU: Rural Oklahoma $86,000

Oklahoma Council on Economic Ed $75,000

$2,800,000 59

AGENCY SAVINGS

60

$1,991,665

$1,789,966

$1,400,000

$1,500,000

$1,600,000

$1,700,000

$1,800,000

$1,900,000

$2,000,000

$2,100,000

Dec

-10

Mar

-11

Jun-

11

Sep-

11

Dec

-11

Mar

-12

Jun-

12

Sep-

12

Dec

-12

Mar

-13

Jun-

13

Sep-

13

Dec

-13

SDE Payroll Per Month 2010-Present

61

343

294

200220240260280300320340360380400

Dec

-10

Feb-

11

Apr

-11

Jun-

11

Aug

-11

Oct

-11

Dec

-11

Feb-

12

Apr

-12

Jun-

12

Aug

-12

Oct

-12

Dec

-12

Feb-

13

Apr

-13

Jun-

13

Aug

-13

Oct

-13

Dec

-13

Number of State Department of Education

Employees 2010-Present

62

State Programs Funded with Carryover from FY 2012 and FY 2013

TLE $1,430,825.00 Special Audits $89,745.00

Think Through Math (Year 1) $428,204.00 K20 Alt Ed (OU) - FY 2012 $91,462.00

Security System in Hodge Building $124,723.00 FY 2012 OMES Contract $550,000.00

Vision 2020 $704,705.00 REAC3H Network (District Outreach) $46,000.00

C3 Schools $47,190.00 REAC3H Coaches $230,000.00

Payne Education Center $334,000.00 Reward Schools $400,000.00 AP Scholarships $624,281.00

AP AVID $52,000.00 Education Delivery Institute $67,286.00

Bill Daggett Center for Educational Leadership $283,880.00 UVA Leadership Program for School Turnaround $108,000.00

Professional Development (Master Teachers) $24,750.00

TOTAL $5,637,051.00 63