DATA ENTRY FORM FOR CASES OF CIVIL NATUREarchaeology.up.nic.in/doc/DATAENTRY.pdf · · 2014-03-18WRIT-PIL 2. WRIT-A ... C.M. Writ Petition No. 4160/ 87 Hon’ble High Court, Allahabad

1. DATA ENTRY FORM FOR CASES OF CIVIL NATURE

1. Notice No. 1176-86 of the Hon. High Court (Lucknown Bench)

Date: 27.02.86

2. C.M. Writ Petition No. 1280/86 of District Lucknow

3. Group: (Tick Mark only)

1. WRIT-PIL 2. WRIT-A 3. WRIT-B 4. WRIT-C 5. WRIT-TAX

4. Petitioner (s) Shri Rakesh Kumar Singh

5. Respondent (s)

1. State of U.P. through the Secretary, Department of Cultural Affairs, Government of U.P.,

2. The Director, U.P. Archaeological Organisation, Lucknow

3. The District Magistrate, Pauri Garhwal

6. The Department concerned: Department of Culture, Government of Uttar Pradesh

7. Subject Matter: Termination of the petitioner’s adhoc service from the post of

Monument Attendant

8. Nature of the case: Service matter

9. Impugned Order dated: 27.01.1986 Passed by Director, U.P. State Archaeological Organization

10. Interim order (if any): Put up this petition for orders on 14th March 1986 to enable the standing

counsel to obtain instructions. Till then the services of the petitioner shall not be terminated and the

operation of the impugned order shall remain stayed. Passed

on 27.02.1986

11. Petitioner (s)’ Counsel (s) P.K. Srivastava

12. Counter Affidavit (Tick mark) 1. Yes ♪ Filed on 10.02.1987 2. Not Filed

13. Rejoinder Affidavit (Tick Mark) 1. Yes Filed on 2. Not Filed

14. Lastly listed on: 19.07. 2000

15. Status of the Case (Tick Mark only)

1. Pending: ♪

2. Disposed of by order dated:

3. Dismissed by order dated:

4. Allowed by order dated:

16. Any other relevant information: With due consultation with the Uttar Pradesh Government

the services of the petitioner have been regularized by the Director, U.P. State Archaeology

Department on 01 August, 2007. An application for the dismissal of the Petition is submitted in the

Hon. High Court on 06 February, 2008.


1. Notice No. 1400/88 of the Hon. High Court (Lucknown Bench) Date: 17.03.88

2. C.M. Writ Petition No. 2573/88 of District Lucknow



4. Petitioner (s) U.P. State Archaeological Organisation Non gazetted employee’s association

5. Respondent (s)

1. State of U.P. through the Secretary, Department of Cultural Affairs

2. Director of Cultural Affairs, Government of U.P.



7. Subject Matter:

For restraining the appointment of Regional Archaeological Officer, Archaeological Engineer and

Archaeological Assistants advertised by the Director, Cultural Affairs.


9. Impugned Order dated: x Passed by: x

10. Interim order (if any): Learned counsel for the state prays for time to obtain instruction. List in the

week commencing on 02.05.88. Till then the opposite parties shall not make appointment on the basis

of advertisements dated 07.12.1987 and 17.01 1988 (annexures 15 and 08 respectively). However, it

will be open to the opposite parties to go ahead with the selection in pursuance of the said

advertisements. Passed on 15.04.1988

11. Petitioner (s)’ Counsel (s) D.S Chaube

12. Counter Affidavit (Tick mark) 1. Yes ♪ Filed on 08/18.07.1988

2. Not Filed


14. Lastly listed on:


5. Pending: ♪ 6. Disposed of by order dated: 7. Dismissed by order dated: 8. Allowed by order dated:

16. Any other relevant information: No appointment was made regarding the advertisements dated

07.12.1987 and 17.01 1988 (annexures 15 and 08 respectively annexed with the petition). However,

such appointments have been made through U.P. Public Service Commission. In the meantime the

U.P. Government has notified Service Rules for the respective posts and the appointments are being

made accordingly. Directorate of Archaeology is negotiating with the Association for the withdrawal of

the Petition and an application in this regard is also submitted to the Chief Standing Counsel with a

copy of the consent letter given by the association.


1. Notice No. 15932/91 of the Hon. High Court (Lucknown Bench) Date: 24.12.91

2. C.M. Writ Petition No. 8207 (S/S)/ of 1991 District Lucknow



4. Petitioner (s) Kumari Nirmala Pande

5. Respondent (s)

1. State of U.P. through the Secretary, Department of Cultural Affairs, Government of U.P.,



7. Subject Matter:

To pay the salary and regularisation of service


9. Impugned Order dated: Passed by

10. Interim order (if any):

List sometime in January 1992 for orders. Learned Standing Counsel may seek instructions in the

meantime. It is further provided that the petitioner shall also be allowed by the opposite parties to

appear for the selection test/interview. It shall be without prejudice to her rights.

Passed on: 18.12 1991

11. Petitioner (s)’ Counsel (s) P.N. Gupta



14. Lastly listed on: 29.10.2004


1. Pending: ♪




16. Any other relevant information:

In compliance to the orders of the Hon,able/ High Court the petitioner was allowed for the selection

test/interview. However she was not found fit for the selection. Expedite application is submitted

through Chief Standing Counsel on 25.02.2008. Further it is to be noted that the Petition under

question has been clubbed with Petition No. 1291 (S/S)/92 of the similar nature.


1. Notice No. 2696-92 (S/S) of the Hon. High Court (Lucknown Bench) Date: 27.02.92

2. C.M. Writ Petition No. 1291( S/B)/ 92 of 1992 District Lucknow

s Group: (Tick Mark only)


4. Petitioner (s) Km. Nirmala Pandey

5. Respondent (s)

1. State of U.P. through the Secretary, Department of Cultural Affairs



7. Subject Matter:

To retain the petitioner in service, not to create an artificial break and to regularise the service.




Opposite party no. 2 is to take a decision on the petitioner’s said representation and pass necessary

orders within three weeks from the date of production of this order before him.

Passed on 26.02.1992

11. Petitioner (s)’ Counsel (s) Tahmina Punwani

12. Counter Affidavit (Tick mark) 1. Yes ♪ Filed on 16.10.1992

2. Not Filed





16. Any other relevant information: Expedite application (25.02.2008) submitted in the office of CSC


1. Notice No. Date:

2. C.M. Writ Petition No. 37120 Hon’ble High Court, Allahabad of 1992

District Mathura



4. Petitioner (s) Chetan Swarup Garg

5. Respondent (s)

1. State of U.P.

2. Nideshak Sanskritik Karya Vibhag

3. The District Magistrate, Mathura

4. Nideshak Rajkiya Sangrahalaya, Mathura

5. Station Officer Incharge, Police Station, Govardhan, Mathura


7. Subject Matter:

Dispute related to protected ancient site of Govardhan ki Chatari, Mathura

8. Nature of the case: Land dispute



The petitioner may make construction on the disputed plots in accordance with the sanction made in

case the construction is being made in an area which is not covered by the notification U/s 3 of the

Ancient Monuments Preservation Act 404 [1904].

Passed on: 02.04.1993

11. Petitioner (s)’ Counsel (s) M.K. Gupta





3. Pending: ♪






1. Notice No. 3286 A/87 Date: 26.06. 87

2. C.M. Writ Petition No. 4160/ 87 Hon’ble High Court, Allahabad (Lucknow Bench) of 1987

District Lucknow



4. Petitioner (s) Prahlad Kumar Singh

5. Respondent (s)

1. Director, Cultural Affairs, Lucknow

2. State of U.P. through Secretary, Cultural Affairs, U.P. Government

3. Director, U.P. State Archaeological Organisation

4. Joint Director, Department of Cultural Affairs

5. Shri Rakesh Kumar Srivastava


7. Subject Matter:

To quash the appointment of opposite party No. 5 on the post of Regional Archaeological Officer.




Notice on behalf of opposite parties No. 1 and 4 has been accepted by the learned chief Standing

counsel. Issue notice to the opposite party No. 5. List far orders in the week commencing 20th July

1987. The opposite parties may file counter affidavit within three weeks. The petitioner may file

rejoinder affidavit by the next date of listing. Till the date of next listing the opposite party No. 5 shall

not take charge of the post of Regional Archaeological Officer referred to in latter dated 10.06.87

provided he has not already taken charge of the office.

Passed on: 26.06.87

11. Petitioner (s)’ Counsel (s) Jagat Bahadur Srivastava





1. Pending:

2. Disposed of by order dated: 12.07.2000




The case has been disposed off. The department has sent a letter on 29.04.2008 to the CSC for

procuring a copy of the judgment.


1. Notice No. 135/96 Date: 05.01.

1996

2. C.M. Writ Petition No. 15 (S/B)/1996 Hon’ble High Court, Allahabad (Lucknow Bench) of 1996

District Lucknow


1. WRIT-PIL 2. WRIT-A 3. WRIT-B 4. WRIT-C ♪ 5. WRIT-TAX

4. Petitioner (s) Prahlad Kumar Singh

5. Respondent (s)

1. U.P. Public Service Commission, Allahabad

2. Secreatary, Culture, Government of Uttar Pradesh

3. Shri Hemraj, Regional Archaeological Officer, Almora


7. Subject Matter: Seniority of the Petitioner

Seniority



10. Interim order (if any): We are of the view that the order dated 05.01. 1996 be modified to the extent

that it will be open for the State Government to declare the result but in pursuance of the selection any

appointment would be made that would be subject to the final decision which may be passed in the

writ petition/

Passed on: 02.04.1993

11. Petitioner (s)’ Counsel (s) S.S. Chauhan





4. Pending: ♪




16. Any other relevant information: An application for early listing is submitted in the Hon. High Court on

25.02.2008

8.

DATA ENTRY FORM FOR CASES OF CIVIL NATURE

1. Notice No. 41511 Date: 13.12.1999

2. C.M. Writ Petition No. 49838/99 Hon’ble High Court, Allahabad of 1999, District Allahabad



4. Petitioner (s) Awadhesh Kumar Singh

5. Respondent (s)

1. State of U.P. through Director of U.P. State Archaeology Organisation, Lucknow

2. U.P. Public Service Commission, Allahabad

3. Ahibaran Singh Katiyar, Conservation Assistant, U.P. State Archaeological Organisation,

Lucknow


7. Subject Matter: Seniority of the Conservation Assistant and

Petition against the regularisation of a colleague.


9. Impugned Order dated: 16.10.1999 Passed by the Director, U.P. State Archaelogy Department


Passed on:

11. Petitioner (s)’ Counsel (s) Uma Kant





5. Pending: ♪






1. Notice No. Date:

2. C.M. Writ Petition No. 257/99 of the Hon. High Court (Lucknown Bench) of 1999

District Lucknow



4. Petitioner (s) 1. State of U.P. through Secretary, Government of U.P.;

2. Director Rajya Purattva Vibhag

5. Respondent (s)

1. Ram Kripal Yadav


7. Subject Matter: Review Petition


9. Impugned Order dated: Passed by:


11. Petitioner (s)’ Counsel (s)

12. Counter Affidavit (Tick mark) 1. Yes ♪ Filed on 14.12. 1999

2. Not Filed





16. Any other relevant information: Expedite application submitted on 03.04.08


1. Notice No 2017/ 2000 Date: 19.02.2000

2. C.M. Writ Petition No. 949 (S/S)/2000 Hon. High Court (Lucknow Bench) of 2000

District Lucknow



4. Petitioner (s) Ahibaran Singh Katiyar

5. Respondent (s)

1. State of U.P. through the Secretary, Department of Culture

2. The Director of Archaeology, Luckniow

3. Sri Awadhesh Kumar Singh, Conservation Assistant, Varanasi Unit, Varanasi

4. Sri Manmohan Srivastava, Conservation Assistant, Lucknow.


7. Subject Matter: Seniority from the date of initial appointment




In view of the aforesaid facts till further orders of this court opposite parties no. 1 and 2 are restricted

from making any promotion on the post of Archaeological Engineer.




2. Not Filed






The department has requested to the CSC to file an expedite application on 26.05.2008.


1. Notice No. Date:

2. C.M. Writ Petition No 400 ( c)/ 2000 of the Hon. High Court (Lucknown Bench) of 2000

District Lucknow



4. Petitioner (s) Ram Kripal Yadav

5. Respondent (s)

1. Rakesh Tewari, Director, Directorate of Archaeology


7. Subject Matter: Contempt of Court

Payment of arrears




Heard on Application for deferment of the hearing of the case in view of the review petition being

pending. The request is rejected as review petition cannot stall contempt proceedings. The opposite

party is directed to file his counter affidavit within three weeks positively.


11. Petitioner (s)’ Counsel (s) Sanjiv Srivastava


2. Not Filed




11. Pending: 12. Disposed of by order dated: ♪ 13. Dismissed by order dated: 14. Allowed by order dated:

16. Any other relevant information: As per information from the CSC office this case has been disposed

off. The copy of the order is being procured.


1. Notice No. Date:

2. C.M. Writ Petition No. 2860 (S/S) /2003 of the Hon. High Court (Lucknown Bench) of 2003

District Lucknow



4. Petitioner (s) Ramesh Chandra Saxena

5. Respondent (s)

1. State of Uttar Pradesh through Secretary, Finance, Government of Uttar Pradesh

2. The Director, Archaeology, Lucknow

3. Director, Central Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, Lucknow.


7. Subject Matter: To provide pro-rata pensionary benefits and lump sum for his servicr rendered.



10. Interim order (if any): Passed on

11. Petitioner (s)’ Counsel (s) J.C. Srivastava

12. Counter Affidavit (Tick mark) 1. Yes ♪ Filed on 30.08.07 by Directorate of pension

2. Not Filed







1. Notice No. 2235/2006 Date: 24.03.2006

2. C.M. Writ Petition No. 2230 (S/S)/2006 of the Hon. High Court (Lucknown Bench) of 2006

District Lucknow



4. Petitioner (s) Ram Kripal Yadav

5. Respondent (s)

1. State of U.P. through its Principal Secretary, Cultural Department, Lucknow

2. The Director, U.P. Archaeological Department, Lucknow

3. Regional Officer, Archaeology, Department of Gorakhpur


7. Subject Matter:

Claim for Medical and Earn Leave, encashment and Bonus etc.




11. Petitioner (s)’ Counsel (s) Ranvijay Singh


2. Not Filed







1. Notice No. Date:

2. C.M. Writ Petition No. 36388/98 of the Hon. High Court Allahabad of 1998 District Varanasi

(Restoration)



4. Petitioner (s) K.L.K. Chandani and others

5. Respondent (s)

1. District Magistrate, Varanasi

2. Principal Secretary, Culture

3. Joint Secretary, Culture


7. Subject Matter:

Protection of an ancient monument in Varanasi



10. Interim order (if any): Application stands allowed. The order dated 10.03.04 is recalled to its original

number Passed on 21.09.07

11. Petitioner (s)’ Counsel (s

12. Counter Affidavit (Tick mark) 1. Yes ♪ 07.12.04

2. Not Filed






Parawise narrative has been submitted in the office of the Chief Standing Counsel.


1. Notice No. Date:

2. C.M. Writ Petition No. 5537/MB/99 (PIL) of the Hon. High Court (Lucknown Bench) of 2003

District Faizabad


1. WRIT-PIL 2. WRIT-A 3. WRIT-B 4. WRIT-C 5.. WRIT-TAX

4. Petitioner (s) Managing Committee of Waqf No. 1325, Faizabad

5. Respondent (s)

1. Secretary, Government of Uttar Pradesh


3. Commissioner, Faizabad

4. District Magistrate, Faizabad,

5. S.S.P. Faizabad


7. Subject Matter: Civil matter

8. Nature of the case: Dispute of land



11. Petitioner (s)’ Counsel (s) M.A.Siddiqui


2. Not Filed





16. Any other relevant information: Expedite application is submitted in the Hon. Court


1. Notice No. Date:

2. C.M. Writ Petition No 31229/05 of the Hon. High Court (Allanhabad) of 2003; District Varanasi


1. WRIT-PIL ♪ 2. WRIT-A 3. WRIT-B 4. WRIT-C 8. WRIT-TAX

4. Petitioner (s) (i) Kautilya Society (ii) Vrinda Dar

5. Respondent (s)

1. State of Uttar Pradesh through Principal Secretary, Department of Culture Government of Uttar Pradesh

2. The Secretary, Development of Housing & Urban Development, Govt. of U.P., Lucknow 3. Varanasi Development Authority, Varanasi through its Chairman/Commissioner, Varanasi 4. Secreatry, Varanasi Development Authority, Varanasi 5. Captain Vikram Singh, Secreatry, VDA, Varanasi 6. Sri Apurva Kumar 7. Sri Vivek Kumar, 8. Sri Manish Kumar


7. Subject Matter: Dispute regarding the possession of land pertaining to the temple declared as an

ancient monument

8. Nature of the case: Civil matter



11. Petitioner (s)’ Counsel (s) Neeraj Tewari

12. Counter Affidavit (Tick mark) 1. Yes

2. Not Filed ♪






Para wise narrative submitted to the CSC.


1. Notice No. 5538/06 Date: 13.06.2006

2. C.M. Writ Petition No 753 (S/B)/ 2006 of the Hon. High Court (Lucknow Bench) of 2003; District

Lucknow



4. Petitioner (s) Jitendra Kumar

5. Respondent (s)

1. State of U.P. through Chief Secretary, Government of Uttar Pradesh 2. Principal Secretary, Culture, Government of Uttar Pradesh 3. Special Secretary, Culture, Government of Uttar Pradesh 4. Shri Subhash Chandra Trivedi, Special Secretary, Culture, Government of Uttar Pradesh 5. Dr. Rakesh Tewari, Director, U.P. State Archaeology Department 6. Shri Vidya Sagar Shukla, Finance Controller, Directorate of Cultural Affairs


7. Subject Matter: Service matter



10. Interim order (if any): Issue notice to opposite party no. 4 to 6 returnable to an early date.

Three weeks time is allowed to file the counter affidavit and thereafter one week to file rejoinder

affidavit. List thereafter. The outcome of the enquiry shall be subject to further order in the present writ

petition. Passed on 16.06.2006

11. Petitioner (s)’ Counsel (s) P.S. Pande

12. Counter Affidavit (Tick mark) 1. Yes Information to be submitted by the section (Govt)

2. Not Filed





16. Any other relevant information: Counter affidavit has been filed by Section at Government level.


1. Notice No. M4838 (MIB) Date: 21.06.2007

2. C.M. Writ Petition No 3824 (M/B) 2007 of the Hon. High Court (Lucknow Bench) of 2007; District

Lucknow



4. Petitioner (s) Padam Kirti

5. Respondent (s)

1. Union of India, Archaeological Survey of India, New Delhi 2. Chief Secretary, Government of Uttar Pradesh 3. Principal Secretary, Urban Development , Government of Uttar Pradesh 4. SSP, Lucknow 5. Vice Chairman, Lucknow Development Authority, Lucknow, 6. Nagar Nigam through its Municipal Commissioner, Lucknow


7. Subject Matter: Removal of encroachments near Protected Monuments

8. Nature of the case: Heritage Conservation



11. Petitioner (s)’ Counsel (s) Padam Kirti


2. Not Filed







1. Notice No. 44301/07 Date: 05.10.07

2. C.M. Writ Petition 50485/2007 the Hon. High Court (Allahabad) of 2007; District Varanasi



4. Petitioner (s) Srimati Beena Singh

5. Respondent (s)

1. State of U.P. through the Collector, Varanasi,

2. Principal Secretary, Cultural Affairs, Government of Uttar Pradesh

3. Joint Secretary, Cultural Affairs, Government of Uttar Pradesh


7. Subject Matter: Protection of protected ancient temple, Varanasi



10. Interim order (if any): Learned Standing Counsel prays for and is allowed one month time for file

counter Affidavit. Three weeks thereafter is allowed to the petitioner for filing rejoinder affidavit. List

thereafter and connect with the records of writ petition no. 36388 of 1998 K.L.K. Chandani and other

v/s State of U.P.

Until further orders of this court the petitioner shall not be disposed from the property in dispute.

Passed on 11.10. 2007

11. Petitioner (s)’ Counsel (s) (1) A.S Diwakar; (2) Vinod Kumar Srivastava

12. Counter Affidavit (Tick mark) 1. Yes Filed on

2. Not Filed ♪





16. Any other relevant information: Para wise narrative submitted in the office of CSC


1. Notice No. Date:

2. C.M. Writ Petition 462 (S/B)/2008 the Hon. High Court (Lucknow Bench) of 2008; District Lucknow



4. Petitioner (s)

1. Government of Uttar Pradesh through Principal Secretary, Culture Department.

2. Director of Archaeology, U.P. Lucknow

5. Respondent (s)

1. Mirza Yusuf Askari

2. State Public Service Tribunal, U.P. Lucknow

3. Shri Prahlad Kumar Singh, Excavation & Exploration Officer, Lucknow


7. Subject Matter: Dismissal of Service

8. Nature of the case: Appeal in higher court


10. Interim order (if any): Issue notice to the respondent no. 1 returnable within four weeks. List immediate

thereafter. Till the date of listing the operation of the order dated 31.12.2007 passed by the State

Public Tribunal , Lucknow in the claim petition No. 638 of 2000 shall remain stayed.


11. Petitioner (s)’ Counsel (s) Rakesh Bajpai


2. Not Filed







1. Notice No. M 10361/07 Date: 05.12.07

2. C.M. Writ Petition 9196/(MB)/2007 the Hon. High Court (Lucknow Bench) of 2007; District Lucknow



4. Petitioner (s) Syed Waseem Rizvi

5. Respondent (s)

1. Union of India through its Secretary, Department of Culture, New Delhi 2. State of U.P. through Chief Secretary, L ucknow 3. State of U.P. through Principal Secretary, Department Culture, Government of U.P. 4. Archaeological Survey of India through its Director, Lucknow 5. Chhatrapati Sahuji Maharaj Medical College, through its Registrar, Lucknow 6. U.P. Rashtriya Nirmana Nigam through its Managing Director, Lucknow 7. Comissioner, Lucknow Division 8. District Magistrate, Lucknow 9. Senior Superintendent of Police, Lucknow


7. Subject Matter: To demolish the construction made within the prohibited area in the vicinity of the

Imambara of Asafuddaula (Bara Imamabara)

8. Nature of the case: Heritage protection


10. Interim order (if any): Heard. A weeks for counter affidavit and 2 weeks for rejoinder Affidavit. List

thereafter, decision taken shall be made as part of record.

Passed on 07.12.07

11. Petitioner (s)’ Counsel (s) Mohammad Haidar


2. Not Filed







1. Notice No. 4442/2008 Date: 29.10.08

2. C.M. Writ Petition the Hon. High Court (Allahabad) of 2008; District Varanasi



4. Petitioner (s) Chetan Agrawal (Chirag Goyal)

5. Respondent (s)

1. State of Uttar Pradesh through its Secretary, Ministry of Cultural Affairs, Lucknow 2. Principal Secreatary, Department of Cultural Affairs, Lucknow 3. Joint Secretary, Department of Cultural Affairs, Government of U.P.


7. Subject Matter: land dispute regarding the protected monument of Gurudham temple, Varanasi



10. Interim order (if any): Connect the writ petition with writ no. 50485/07 in next cause list.

Passed on 29.01.08

11. Petitioner (s)’ Counsel (s) Manoj Mishra


2. Not Filed ♪







1. Notice No. M 2181/08 Date: 04.03.08

2. C.M. Writ Petition No. 2095 M/B (PIL)/ 2008 the Hon. High Court (Lucknow Bench) of 2008; District

Lucknow



4. Petitioner (s) Sultan Ibrahim Safavi

5. Respondent (s)

1. Union of India through Secretary, department of Culture, Government of India, New Delhi 2. State of U.P. through Secretary, Department of Culture, Lucknow 3. Archaeological Suirvey of India through its Superintendent, Lucknopw 4. District Magistrate, Lucknow 5. Waqf Husainabad and other Allied Trust, Lucknow through its Secretary Chief Executive

officer 6. Chairman, Husainabad and Allied Trust, Lucknow 7. Shia Central Board of Waqf, U.P. through its President/ Chief Executive Officer 8. Director, Tourism Development, Lucknow 9. Senior Superintendent of Police, Lucknow


7. Subject Matter: To remove the encroachments from protected Monuments of Bara Imambara,

Chota Imamabara, Sat Khanda situated in the vicinity.

8. Nature of the case: Heritage protection



11. Petitioner (s)’ Counsel (s) (i) G.S.L. Varma, (II) S.H. Ibrahim


3. Not Filed ♪







1. Notice No. 1256/99 Date: 26.07.1999

2. C.M. Writ Petition 1256/99 Hon. Lok Seva Adhikaran of 1999; District Lucknow



4. Petitioner (s) Girish Chandra Singh

5. Respondent (s)

1. State of U.P. through Secretary, Culture, Government of Uttar Pradesh 2. The Director, Deapartment of Archaeology, Governemnt of Uttar Pradesh 3. The Director, Department of Culture, Government of U.P. 4. Shri K.K. Singh, Exploration Assistant


7. Subject Matter: To regularise the services of the petitioner from the initial date of adhoc

appointment and regarding the seniority.



10. Interim order (if any): In the meantime, the recommendation of the DPC, if made prior to the next

date fixed, directed to be kept in sealed cover and not be acted upon till further orders of the Tribunal.

Passed on



4. Not Filed







1. Notice No. Date:

2. C.M. Writ Petition 1104/2007 of 2007 Civil Judge (Senior Division) ; District Varanasi



4. Petitioner (s) Ms. Garima Singh and Chandni

5. Respondent (s)

1. U.P. Government through District Magistarate, Varanasi 2. Commissioner, Varanasi Division 3. District Magistrate, Varanasi 4. Regional Archaeological Officer, Varanasi


7. Subject Matter: Land dispute






5. Not Filed







1. Notice No. Date:

2. C.M. Writ Petition 1105/2007 of 2007 Civil Judge (Senior Division); District Varanasi



4. Petitioner (s) Sri Naveen Ratan and Sri Satyendra Verma

5. Respondent (s)

1. U.P. Government through District Magistarate, Varanasi 2. Commissioner, Varanasi Division 3. District Magistrate, Varanasi 4. Regional Archaeological Officer, Varanasi


7. Subject Matter: Civil matter






6. Not Filed







1. Notice No. Date:

2. C.M. Writ Petition 610/2007 of Additional Civil Judge I (Junior Division); District Kanpur



4. Petitioner (s) Sri Shobha Lal Dixit

5. Respondent (s)

1. Nand Kishor Dixit, Monument Attendant, U.P. State Archaeology Department


7. Subject Matter: Heritage protection






7. Not Filed






Documents

DATA ENTRY FORM FOR CASES OF CIVIL NATUREarchaeology.up.nic.in/doc/DATAENTRY.pdf · · 2014-03-18WRIT-PIL 2. WRIT-A ... C.M. Writ Petition No. 4160/ 87 Hon’ble High Court, Allahabad