Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Data Provenance Community Meeting
November 13, 2014
2
Meeting Etiquette
Click on the “chat” bubble at the top of the meeting window to
send a chat.
• Please mute your phone when you are not speaking to prevent background noise.– All meetings are recorded.
• Please do not put your phone on hold. – Hang up and dial back in to prevent hold
music.• Please announce your name before
speaking• Use the “Chat” feature to ask questions or
share comments.– Send chats to “All Participants” so they
can be addressed publicly in the chat, or discussed in the meeting (as appropriate).
Agenda
Topic Time Allotted
Recap of 11/6 All Hands Meeting – End-to-End Workflow Discussion
5 minutes
Review of Harmonization Process 5 minutes
Review Candidate Standards List & Identify PoCs 25 minutes
W3C Provenance Presentation by Satya Sahoo 15 minutes
Comments and Questions 10 minutes
End-to-End Workflow Recap
• Identified possible and agreed-upon metadata and provenance related events within the workflow
• Updates to Workflow diagram:– Include HIE as a potential receiving system– Combine ‘extract/aggregate clinical information,’ ‘maintain clinical
information,’ and ‘create exchange artifact’ when data passes through an intermediary
• Determined that we are trying to be agnostic as to whether the flow is a ‘pull’ or ‘push’ mechanism
• Need to define attestation/attest and when it should occur
Standards Development & Harmonization: Workflow
Outputs
Validate candidate standards list
Map UCR to candidate standards
Analyze mapped standards per HITSC criteria to narrow down any conflicting standards resulting from the UCR-Standards mapping
Perform technical feasibility of analysis
Review with community
Use Case Requirements Crosswalk
Develop gap mitigation plan
Perform current state workflow analyses
Draft Solution diagram/matrices
Validate solution plan
Confirm data model approach
Modify/harmonize existing standard(s) to produce final standards
Achieve community consensus or agreement
Final standards
Using final standards, develop Implementation Guide document
Document IG Conformance Statements in RTM
Develop Examples to inform implementers
Validate examples Achieve community
consensus or agreement
Implementation Guide
Survey SDO or standards organization options
Select balloting approach
Align timeline with ballot cycles
Submit documents informing SDO of intent to ballot
Submit content to SDO
Conduct balloting cycle & reconciliation per SDO guidelines
Balloted standards
Evaluate Standards
Plan for Solution and
Final standards
Develop Implementation
Guide
Potential SDO Balloting
6
DPROV Harmonization Timeline
7
Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. MarchToday
Stan
dard
s Ev
alua
tion
Solu
tion
Plan
ning
IG D
evel
opm
ent
DPROV Harm Launch
Standards Analysis & Assessment
Solution Planning
Create IG Template
Introduction
Implementation Approach
Suggested Enhancements
End-to-End Review
12/1 - 1/9
10/23 – 12/12
12/15 - 1/5
1/8 - 1/22
1/12 - 2/12
2/12 - 2/19
2/19 – 3/5
Key Tasks and Work Outputs
1. HITSC Evaluation– Quantitative analysis of Candidate Standards List
2. UCR Crosswalk – Qualitative evaluation of Candidate Standards List– Sub-workgroup meetings to determine EHR Functional Model
and Vocabulary Standards– Mitigate any gaps within existing standards
3. Solution Planning– Final layered solution of standards across all standards
categories and requirements used for implementation guidance
4. Final Deliverable: Implementation Guide
Candidate Standards ListS&I Support Staff gathers list of initial standards within the Candidate Standards List and the community further narrows down the standards
Standard
One worksheet per Standards Category (4 total)• Standard• Standards Development Organization• Description• Reference Links• Notes
Note: This is a snapshot, not the comprehensive Candidate Standards List
Standards Evaluation UCR Mapping Solution Plan IG Development
Candidate Standards Review
Note- Below artifact will be reviewed within the separate Candidate Standards List document:I. Introduce and review the following:
1. Purpose of document2. Content & Structure Standards3. Terminology & Code Values4. Point of Contact Assignments Click the icon to
open the Excel file
Candidate Standards
Wiki Overview
• Data Provenance Standards and Harmonization page:– http://
wiki.siframework.org/Data+Provenance+Use+Case+Harmonization+and+Standards
– Comments are due by EOD on the Wednesday preceding the Thursday All Hands call
Next Steps
• Review: Candidate Standards and Workflow Analysis
• Next Meeting is Thursday, November 20th from 2:30pm - 3:30pm EST
• Reminder: All Data Provenance Integration Announcements, Meeting Schedules, Agendas, Minutes, Reference Materials, Harmonization materials, Use Case, Project Charter and general information will be posted on the DPROV Wiki page– http://wiki.siframework.org/Data+Provenance+Initiative
13
Support Team and QuestionsPlease feel free to reach out to any member of the Data Provenance
Support Team:• Initiative Coordinator: Johnathan Coleman: [email protected] • OCPO Sponsor: Julie Chua: [email protected] • OST Sponsor: Mera Choi: [email protected]• Subject Matter Experts: Kathleen Conner: [email protected] and Bob Yencha:
[email protected] • Support Team:
– Project Management: Jamie Parker: [email protected] – Use Case Development: Atanu Sen: [email protected]– Harmonization and Standards Development Support:
» Alex Lowitt: [email protected]» Atanu Sen: [email protected]» Perri Smith: [email protected]
– Support: » Lynette Elliott: [email protected] and Apurva Dharia:
