45
Communications & Tracking Basics David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer May 13, 2009 The findings and conclusions in this presentation have not been formally disseminated by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health and should not be construed to represent any agency determination or policy. Mention of company names or products does not imply endorsement by NIOSH.

David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer

Communications & Tracking Basics

David Snyder, MS, PESenior Mine Electrical EngineerMay 13, 2009

The findings and conclusions in this presentation have not been formally disseminated by the National Institute for

Occupational Safety and Health and should not be construed to represent any agency determination or policy. Mention of

company names or products does not imply endorsement by NIOSH.

Page 2: David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer

Overview

• Communications Systems – How they work– General Principles– Primary Wireless Systems– Alternate Communications Path & Secondary

Systems• Tracking Systems – How they work

– Zone-Based– RSSI-based systems

Page 3: David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer

A Communications Link

“Talking” “Listening”

Page 4: David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer

Communications Link Characteristics

• Amount of power available for communicating across a link is determined by:– Transmitter Power– Receiver Sensitivity– Noise & Other Impairments

• The transmitted power is continuously “lost” as the energy travels through the transmission medium.

Page 5: David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer

Role of EM Energy• All modern communications and tracking

(CT) systems depend upon the transmission and reception of energy.

• The energy being transferred is referred to as electromagnetic energy (EM).

• Electromagnetic energy is everywhere in the environment and includes radio waves, light energy, and x-rays.

• Electromagnetic energy can be visualized as a traveling wave.

Page 6: David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer

Role of EM Energy

All waves are characterized by their wavelength and amplitude.

Page 7: David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer

TTE(ULF/ELF/ LF)

MF “Parasitic Propagation”

VHF/UHF Mine Entry Waveguide Propagation

Electromagnetic Spectrum

Page 8: David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer

Role of EM Energy• Wavelengths are chosen to be suitable for “propagating”

through the transmission medium.

Wavelengths for Underground Applications

System TypeTransmission

Medium Wavelength

Conventional Two Way Radio "Free Space" 0.2 to 30 ft

Leaky Feeder Mine Entry 2 to 7ft

Node based Systems Mine Entry 0.2 to 2 ft

Medium Frequency Along metallic structures 2000 to 3200 ft

Through The EarthDirectly through the

ground or coal 100,000 ft to 2000 miles

Page 9: David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer

A Wireless Communications Link

The antenna “couples” the energy from the transmitter to the transmission medium or vice versa for the receiver.

Page 10: David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer

Transceivers & Antennas• A device that both transmits and receives

wirelessly is called a radio transceiver.• Transmitter & Receiver Antennas are an

important part of the system.– Long wavelengths (low frequencies) require BIG

antennas to effectively couple energy.– Short wavelengths (high frequencies) require small

antennas (Short wavelengths are commonly used for mobile wireless communications).

Page 11: David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer

Wearable Devices

• Conventional two-way radio frequencies (high frequencies) permit the use of antennas and electronics that are small enough to be worn all day by a miner.

Wearable Devices Conventional Radio Frequencies (VHF – SHF)

Conventional Radio Frequencies

In-mine Infrastructure

• Analysis and test data results show that radio range using conventional radio frequencies is limited.

Page 12: David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer

So how do we get the information to the surface?

Page 13: David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer

Distributed Antenna Approach (Leaky Feeder)

Page 14: David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer

Network Approach (Node-Based Systems)

Page 15: David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer

Networks

An example of a very simple network

Page 16: David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer

Primary Communications Signal Propagation

• The radio signals in this part of the spectrum travel or “propagate” along the mine entry.

• The wavelength (frequency) that works best has been shown to be dependant on the size of the entry.

• For typical entry sizes, the “minimum path loss” is generally between 700 and 1100 MHz.

• Smaller openings favor higher frequencies (shorter wave lengths).

Page 17: David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer

Path Loss versus Wavelength

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500Frequency (MHz)

Path

Los

s (d

B a

t 100

0 ft)

Minimum Path Loss

Page 18: David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer

Primary Communications Systems• Leaky feeder and network (node) based

systems– Operate in the conventional two-way radio bands– Allow the miner to have small devices with long

battery life– Have sufficient throughput for general, as well as

emergency, operations• Each approach has advantages, limitations,

and inherent vulnerabilities

Page 19: David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer

Wireless Coverage has tremendous safety advantages

Coverage of Critical Areas with Wireless Systems

Page 20: David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer

Survivability … The Challenge

What happens if 2000 feet of all entries are lost?

Page 21: David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer

Alternate Communication Paths

Survivability ….. The Goal

Page 22: David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer

Survivability: The Approach

• The principal challenge for post-accident operation is survivability.

• Lessons learned:– No practical way to harden primary communications

infrastructure to survive any conceivable event– Survivability is most practically achieved through

alternate communications paths• Survivability has as much to do with the mine-

specific design and installation as it does the technology.

Page 23: David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer

Alternate Communications Paths for Leaky Feeder

Page 24: David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer

Alternate Communications Paths for Node-Based Systems

Page 25: David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer

Alternate Communications Paths for Node-Based Systems (Mesh)

Page 26: David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer

Alternate Communications Paths

• Alternate communications paths provide system redundancy.

• Ideally, the alternate communications path is “truly diverse.”

• Independent failure mechanisms

Page 27: David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer

Secondary Systems• Medium Frequency Systems and Through-

the-Earth Systems are viable secondary systems that can provide alternate communications paths out of the mine.

• Secondary System– Operates in non-conventional frequency bands– Uses large antennas that are best suited for fixed

locations or portable (“luggable”) applications– Do not have sufficient throughput for general

operations

Page 28: David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer

Medium Frequency Communications

Page 29: David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer

Through-the-Earth (TTE) Communications

Page 30: David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer

Electronic Tracking Systems

Systems that are anticipated within the MINER Act timeframe are radio-based systems– Zone-based systems are usually based on RFID

(Radio Frequency Identification Device) tags and RFID readers.

– RSSI (Received Signal Strength Indicator)-based systems generally use the same nodes as those for node-based communications.

Page 31: David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer

Radio-Based Tracking Systems

Tracking Systems depend on picking up a radio signal from the miner’s device.

Page 32: David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer

Zone-Based System

• Reader Location versus Miner Location

• Error is difference between the two

Page 33: David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer

RSSI-Based System RSSI = Received Signal Strength Indicator

Miner location is based on the estimated distance to each node

Page 34: David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer

RSSI-Based Estimation

Tx Rx

The measured loss is used to estimate the distance between the transmitter and receiver: Power Loss = Tx Power – Rx Power

Page 35: David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer

RSSI-Based System

• RSSI = Received Signal Strength Indicator• Error is the difference between the true

location and the RSSI estimated location– With two or more nodes, RSSI techniques can

estimate not only how far from the node, but in which entry the miner is likely to be located.

– With only one node you have the same ambiguity as with a single reader.

Page 36: David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer

RSSI-Based System RSSI = Received Signal Strength Indicator

Miner location is based on the estimated distance to each node

Page 37: David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer

RSSI Error Source

Anything that affects the received signal strength influences the accuracy:– Wave behavior constructive – destructive

multipath– Body losses reduce signal strength– Stoppings decrease signal strength– Mine equipment in the entries affects the signal

strength– Crosscuts, dips, and turns all affect signal

strength

Page 38: David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer

RSSI Error Test

• Transmitters spaced every 100 ft• Miner walks along entry and true position recorded

100 ft

Transmitters

ReceiverMiners’ Path

• Error (true location versus the RSSI estimated location) recorded for each sample point

Page 39: David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer

RSSI Error DistributionProbability Distribution (Cumulative)

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

180

190

200

210

Error (feet)

% P

roba

bilit

y

Median Error

Maximum Error

90% Probability

Page 40: David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer

RSSI Error DistributionProbability Distribution (Cumulative)

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

180

190

200

210

Error (feet)

% P

roba

bilit

y

Median Error

Maximum Error

90% Probability

“Accuracy” (for a radio based system) refers to the error limits of a system defined within some acceptable level of certainty.

Page 41: David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer

RSSI Error Distribution

• Accuracy of an RSSI-based system is highly probabilistic (i.e. there is an element of chance)

• Without additional processing, RSSI can render an average error of about half the distance between the nodes.

Page 42: David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer

RSSI Error Correction Techniques

• There are ways to improve the accuracy, including:– Time averaging of the received signal– Considering the rate of travel of the miner– Mapping movement to the mine map– Time-of-Arrival of the signal

• Even with these improvements, there is a significant uncertainty. This is not unique to the UG environment; it is inherent to radio frequency-based location systems.

Page 43: David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer

RSSI Error Correction Techniques

• RSSI Error Correction improvements are highly dependant on computer processing.– Computer algorithms are proprietary– Resources to validate software are extraordinarily

high-cost.

• Neither NIOSH nor MSHA has attempted to validate average or maximum errors.

Page 44: David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer

Summary

• Underground communications capabilities are limited by the laws of physics.

• An understanding of the operating principles of the C&T systems proposed for UG operations is essential in the design, layout, installation, and operations.

• Communication and tracking using radio technology involve some level of uncertainty.

• Further information is available in the NIOSH C&T tutorial.

Page 45: David Snyder, MS, PE Senior Mine Electrical Engineer

Questions?