Dearborn Administrator Evaluation Program

Dearborn Board of Education Meeting, November 26, 2012

By Andy Denison, ADSA President and Glenn

Maleyko, Director of Human Resources

Thank you to the following

individuals/groups for their support

The Board of EducationMr. Whiston, SuperintendentChris Kenniburg – website support

Administrator Evaluation Committee

Administrator Evaluation Committee

Patty Buoy Youssef MosallamJill Chochol Shannon PetersonAndrew Denison Gail ShenkmanGlenn Maleyko

Legislative Changes

Most of the changes reflect what is required by state law

We had a fair process that included input from all levels.

Our evaluation tool is in compliance with the state legislation.

Our 2008 initial model was also aligned with the intent behind the state legislation

Legislative Changes Beginning 2013-14:

Evaluations Must Include

Annual Year End Evaluation for Administrators.

Student growth data by 2013-2014, 25%; 2014-15, 40% 2015-16 50%.

Administrator’s training and proficiency in using the evaluation tool for teachers.

Legislative Changes Beginning 2013-14:

Evaluations Must Include

Progress made by schools in meeting the school improvement plan

Pupil Attendance

Student, parent, and teacher feedback

Legislative Changes Beginning 2013-14:

Those rated ineffective or minimally effective would need an improvement plan

If rated ineffective on 3 consecutive year end evaluation the administrator must be dismissed.

If rated highly effective on 3 consecutive evaluations the administrator would only need to be evaluated every 2 years.

Legislative Changes Beginning 2013-14:

Established the Michigan Council for Educator Effectiveness (Formerly Named the Governor’s council).

Recommendations will hopefully be coming from the council in the near future.

Data Included in School Profile

State Accountability Proficiency Data (MEAP and MME)

Student Growth Data(DRA, SRI, Explore, Plan, Start Math, etc. )

Student Attendance Data

Student Subgroup Data

Data Included in School Profile

School Improvement Data

Intervention Profile Data

Discipline Data

Information on Teacher Evaluations

Other Artifacts

Most Significant Change

- We have eliminated the use of the North Carolina rubric. We are now in better compliance with the 4 scale state rating system.

- Rating scale, ineffective, minimally effective, effective and highly effective by September 19, 2011- This change was already implemented.

- Rubric based on work by Kim Marshall in alignment with work by Charlotte Danielson and Bob Marzano

Rubric Standards

A. Diagnosis and Planning

B. Priority Management and Communication

C. Curriculum and Data

D. Supervision, Evaluation, and Professional Development

E. Discipline and Family Involvement

F. Management and External Relations

Administrative Tool Timeline Self Assessment- By September 30th.

Meeting with Evaluator to discuss goals and data to be gathered by October 31st.

Data Collection and Mid Year Visit to the school by evaluator between November 1st and March 30th.

Administrator provides a brief summary on progress. By May 1st. School Profile should also be completed.

Year End Evaluation Meeting by June 15th. This must be submitted to HR by this date.

Questions?

HR Website for the tools and HR blog for

training items http://dearbornschools.org/hr-employment/hr-evaluation-tools