Upload
eryk
View
39
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Decision Making for Results. Decision Making for Results (DMR). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Decision Making for Results
Decision Making for Results (DMR)
DMR is a six-step process that allows you to examine your school or district data at the macro level. After analyzing this data in a collaborative manner, you will be able to make leadership and instructional decisions to guide your continuous school improvement.
Principles of Decision Making for Results (DMR)Antecedents
CollaborationAccountability
Adult Actions (Cause Data)
* Instructional Strategies* Administrative Structures* Conditions for Learning
* Congruence* Respect for Diversity* Fairness* Specificity* Accuracy* Universality* Feedback for continuous improvement
Collaboration has to be built into
every step of data management and
integrated into every data-driven
decision.
“Only by evaluating both causes and effects in a comprehensive accountability system can leaders, teachers, and policymakers understand the complexities of student achievement and the efficacy of teaching and leadership practices.”
Reeves, 2006
Reeves, 2006
Effect data: Outcomes or results
Cause data: Professional practices that create specific effects or results
Definitions and Examples
DMR Six-Step ProcessStep
1:Conduct a Treasure
Hunt
Step 2:Analyze Data
to Prioritize Needs
Step 3:Establish
SMARTGoals
Step 4:Select
Specific Strategies
Step 5:Determine
Results Indicators
Step 6:Monitor and
Evaluate Results
Inquiry:DevelopQuestions
Step 1: Conduct a Treasure Hunt
Why?To gather and organize data in order to gain insights about teaching, learning, and leadership practices.
Considerations: Measures of Data Disaggregation Triangulation Reflection
Measures of Data can include:
Measuresof
Data
StudentPerforman
ceData
BehaviorData
Well-BeingData
Demographic
Data
PerceptionData
SchoolProcess
Data
Disaggregation
• To separate something into its component parts, or break apart
“Disaggregation is not a problem-solving strategy. It is a problem-finding strategy.”
- Victoria Bernhardt, Data Analysis for Comprehensive Schoolwide Improvement 1998
Example of Step 1 (The Treasure Hunt):School: Anytown Middle Content Area: Writing
Assessment Data: Grade 8 GA Writing Data, Item Analysis, and School/District Assessment
Subskill(s): Writing ProcessContent Areas and School Year Data
Represents→
Enter Grade Level or Special Subgroups ↓
Content Conventions Content Content/Development Content Organization
School Year ’11, ‘12, ‘13 School Year ’11, ‘12, ‘13 School Year ’11, ‘12, ‘13
ALL 13 88/118 = 74.5% 13 82/118 = 69.4% 13 63/118 = 53.3%12 71/111 = 63.9% 12 66/111 = 59.4% 12 51/111 = 45.9%11 74/107 = 69.1% 11 70/107 = 65.4% 11 53/107 = 49.5%
Caucasian 13 49/54 = 90.7% 13 46/54 = 85.1% 13 35/54 = 64.8%12 42/51 = 82.3% 12 39/51 = 76.4% 12 30/51 = 58.8%11 45/52 = 86.5% 11 42/52 = 80.7% 11 32/52 = 61.5%
African American 13 25/37 = 67.5% 13 23/37 = 62.1% 13 18/37 = 48.6%12 18/35 = 51.4% 12 17/35 = 48.5% 12 13/35 = 37.1%11 21/33 = 63.6% 11 20/33 = 60.6% 11 15/33 = 45.4%
Hispanic 13 14/27 = 51.8% 13 13/27 = 48.1% 13 10/27 = 37%12 11/25 = 44% 12 10/25 = 40% 12 8/25 = 32%11 8/22 = 36.3% 11 8/22 = 36.3% 11 6/22 = 27.2%
ELL 13 4/12 = 33.3% 13 4/12 = 33.3% 13 3/12 = 25%12 3/11 = 27.2% 12 3/11 = 27.2% 12 2/11 = 18.1%11 3/8 = 37.5% 11 3/8 = 37.5% 11 2/8 = 25%
Non-ELL 13 84/106 = 79.2% 13 78/106 = 73.5% 13 60/106 = 56.6%12 68/100 = 68% 12 63/100 = 63% 12 49/100 = 49%11 71/99 = 71.7% 11 67/99 = 67.6% 11 51/99 = 51.5%
SPED 13 7/25 = 28% 13 7/25 = 28% 13 5/25 = 20%12 7/23 = 30.4% 12 7/23 = 30.4% 12 5/23 = 21.7%11 7/22 = 31.8% 11 7/22 = 31.8% 11 5/22 = 22.7%
Non-SPED 13 75/93 = 80.6% 13 81/93 = 87% 13 58/93 = 62.3%12 59/88 = 67% 12 61/88 = 69.3% 12 46/88 = 52.2%11 63/85 = 74.1% 11 61/80 = 76.2% 11 48/85 = 56.4%
TriangulationTriangulation is a process that allows you to view achievement results with different lenses and provides a more comprehensive picture of teaching, learning, and leadership. Triangulation can be applied to the data-driven decision-making process by examining the interaction of antecedent data, collaboration data, and accountability data. Each set lends itself to trend tracking and pattern identification. In broad terms, triangulation is a method of extrapolating meaning from raw data – a way to find the critical information, see the big picture, and identify key components (angles). In education, triangulation describes efforts to determine needs or targets from diverse types of data. (Stephen H. White, Beyond the Numbers, 2011, pgs. 103-108).
Triangulation Example:GA Grade 8 Writing Assmt.
Strong increase in scores ‘12 to ‘13 but significant performance gaps btw. Caucasian,
Afr. Am., & Hispanic
All students stronger on conventions – 74.5% proficient
Organization – all students 53.3% proficient
School’s Mock Writing Prompt
90% of students proficient in writing
85% of students proficient in selected Organization
Significant performance gaps when compared to PASS results
Students’ Writing Portfolios
Show frequent drafts with revisions for mechanics, conventions, etc.
Show student multiple idea development drafts/feedback
Show less evidence of proofreading and editing
Step 2: Analyze Data to Prioritize Needs
Why?To identify causes for celebration and to identify areas of concern
Considerations: Strengths Needs Performance behavior Inference
Example of Step 2 (Analyze Data to Prioritize Needs):Performance Behavior: Rationale
Strength(s):
Conventions
Content Development
Obstacle(s):
Organization
• We gave multiple opportunities for students to practice revising their own writing in order to improve conventions, mechanics, etc. We held multiple job-embedded PD sessions on this portion of the Writer’s Workshop.
• Content/Development – We had PD on developing ideas in student’s planning and drafting samples in portfolios.
• Organization – Students are able to identify organizing topic and supporting details for their writing but do not transition from that to a well organized paper. PASS results show weak organizational components and students’ writing samples show week transitions.
Step 3: Establish SMART GoalsWhy?To identify your most critical goals for student achievement based on the challenges that were identified throughout the inquiry process.
Criteria: Specific (What exactly will we measure?) Measurable (How will we measure it?) Achievable (Is this a reasonable goal?) Relevant (Are goals aligned with the CIP?) Timely (Does each goal have a defined timeframe?)
Example of Step 3 (Establish SMART Goals):Goal 1
Percentage of ________________________ scoring proficient or higher in _________________
will increase from ____________ to _____________ by the end of the ____________ school
year as measured by _________________________ administered in ___________________.
Goal 2
Percentage of ________________________ scoring proficient or higher in _________________
will increase from ____________ to _____________ by the end of the ____________ school
year as measured by _________________________ administered in ___________________.
Grade 8 students Organization
53% 68% 2013 - 2014
GA Grade 8 Writing Assmt. Feb 2014
Step 4: Select Specific Strategies
Why?Adult Actions will impact student achievement
Considerations: Instructional Strategies Organizational Strategies Leadership Strategies Programmatic Strategies
Strategies are: Action-oriented Measurable Specific Research-based
Example of Step 4 (Select Specific Strategies):Prioritized Needs (2-3
Maximum):Strategies (4 Maximum)
Organization • Instructional – Engage students in editing and revising for every paper created in the Writer’s Workshop including 2 or 3 times a week mini lessons on transitioning from brainstorm to writing
• Leadership and Organizational – change the schedule in order to provide a common planning time and schedule Literacy Coach to attend ELA meetings 2 x week
• Leadership and Instructional – Increase teacher capacity in this component of the Writer’s Workshop through initial PD followed by coaching and feedback provided by building Literacy Coach and District PLS – min 2 x week
Step 5: Determine Results IndicatorsWhy?To monitor the degree of implementation and evaluate the effectiveness of the strategies.
Considerations: Serve as an interim measurement Used to determine effective implementation of a strategy Used to determine if strategy is having the desired
impact Used to help determine midcourse corrections
Example of Step 5 (Determine Results Indicators):
Prioritized Needs (2-3 Maximum):
Strategies (4 Maximum)
Strategy
Leadership and Organizational – change the schedule in order to provide a common planning time and schedule Literacy Coach to attend ELA meetings 2 x week
• Implementation: Master calendar reflects common planning time; Literacy Coach’s calendar shows preserved time for 2 x week ELA meetings; minutes of meetings show evidence of collaboration on writing
• Effectiveness: Classroom observations show evidence of strategies discussed in collaboration actually in use; Portfolio samples show evidence of collaboratively planned strategy use
Step 6: Monitor and Evaluate Results
Why?To engage in a continuous improvement cycle that:
• Identifies midcourse corrections where needed
• Adjusts strategies to ensure fidelity of implementation
Example of Step 6 (Monitor and Evaluate Results):
Monitoring Plan TemplateCluster or School Team Date Dates of Next Monitoring Cycle
Goal Targeted Strategies
Has This Strategy Been Implemented? Not Implemented Partially Implemented Implemented Fully
Reasons Implementation Was Incomplete or Did Not Occur?
Has This Activity Had Impact? Yes No
Reasons Expected Impact Did or Did Not Occur:
Evidence of Actual Impact on Instructional Practice and/or Student Learning:
Suggested Adjustments or Recommendations:
Reflections: Other Relevant Information:
Additional Support:Data Teams Refresher Courses will be offered during the 2013-14 SY. Check MyPLC for updates and to register.
Always Feel free to Contact your Regional Data Analystsin the department of Research & Evaluation for School Improvement:
• East Region – Stacey L. Johnson ([email protected])• West Region – Curtis L. Grier ([email protected])• South Region – Adrienne T. Johnson ([email protected])• North Region – Holly Hayes-Morrisey ([email protected])• CLL – Adam Churney ([email protected])