Dedicated to Making a Difference DEDICATED TO MAKING A DIFFERENCE Cement Sustainability Initiative Forum 2009 São Paulo, Brazil ‘Perspectives from around

Dedicated to Making a DifferenceDEDICATED TO MAKING A DIFFERENCE

Cement Sustainability Initiative Forum 2009São Paulo, Brazil

‘Perspectives from around the world’1 September 2009


Cement Sustainability Initiative Forum 2009‘Perspectives from around the world’: Brazil

José Otavio Carvalho Sindicato Nacional da Industria do Cimento

(SNIC)


Brazil x Latin AmericaBrazil x Latin America

Sources: ONU/CEPAL; IBGE/FGV

579 M190 M

US$ 3.6 tri (+5.7%)US$ 1.3 tri (+5.7%)

US$ 6.437 / inhabUS$ 7.108 / inhab

20.4 M km28.5 M km2 (world 5th)

Population (2008)

GDP (2007)

GDP per capita (2007)

Territory

Latin AmericaBrazil

+3.3%+5.1%GDP (2008)(Annual Rate Variation)


148 M tons51.4 M tons

260 kg271 kg

9.2 M tons0.8 M ton

153 M tons52 M tons

Consumption

Per capita Consumption

Exports (cement & clinker)

Production

Latin America (2007)Brazil (2008)

4.5 M tons0.4 M tonImports (cement & clinker)

Cement IndustryCement Industry

Sources: SNIC / CEMBUREAU

Dedicated to Making a DifferenceDedicated to Making a Difference

Scenario of Brazilian Cement IndustryScenario of Brazilian Cement Industry

10 groups

68 plants

46 clinker plants

22 grinding plants

Capacity: 63 M tons

Source: SNIC 2008

Dedicated to Making a Difference

Scenario of Brazilian Cement IndustryScenario of Brazilian Cement Industry

2008

Cement Consumption

-

10

20

30

40

50

60

1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005

M tons


Brazil GHG InventoryBrazil GHG InventoryCO2 - Emissions National Inventory

for 1994*

Brazil’s total CO2 Emissions:

*Made public in 2004 Source: Brazilian Government

Transports; 9%

Industry; 9%

Total: 1.03 billion tons

Industry; 7,6%

Others; 7%

Cement; 1,4% **

Total: 1.03 billion tons

** Cement: 14,277 M tonA 2nd edition, for the period 1995-2005, is being prepared by the Brazilian Government

Land Use and Forest Fires;

75%


WBCSD – CSI in BrazilWBCSD – CSI in Brazil6 groups out of 10 in Brazil are already CSI members, making up 70% national production, with their own specific reduction targets for the next years

As stated on their reports, some of them have reached 20% to 30% reduction in CO2 emissions compared to 1990 figures

All of them are committed to report their CO2 inventory


Brazilian Cement Industry GHG-Reduction ToolsBrazilian Cement Industry GHG-Reduction ToolsThe Brazilian cement industry has implemented actions that contribute substantially to GHG reduction:

Energy efficiency Alternative fuels Additions in the cement production

Brazil is a continental wide country. That makes regional differences in these actions, depending on the local availability of cement additions (for instance fly ash in South, slag in Southeast), limestone composition and use of alternative fuels.


Energy EfficiencyEnergy EfficiencyModern Industry

99% (capacity) dry, pre-heaters & pre-calciners

Burners developed to use fuels such as pet coke and waste

High energy efficiencyThermal consumption = 2734 MJ/ton cement* (or 653 kcal/kg)Electricity = 104 kWh/ton cement**

Brazil has a clean electric power generation, with 89% deriving from renewable sources (84% hydro and 5% biomass and eolic)*

* Brazilian Government 2007 / ** Brazilian Government 2005


FUELS CONSUMPTION

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1975

1977

1979

1981

1983

1985

1987

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

MINERAL COAL

FUEL OIL

COAL

PETCOKE

ALTERNATIVE FUELS

OTHERS*

*Others: natural gas, diesel

Source: Brazilian Government 2007

Alternative FuelsAlternative Fuels


Permitted plants = 35Waste recovery = 1 M ton/year

Including 166,000 tons of scrap tires

Substitution rate = 15%Capacity of Co-Processing = 2.5 M tons

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

Co-Processamento (1.000 t)Co-processing (1.000 ton)

Alternative Fuels – Co-processingAlternative Fuels – Co-processing


Additions in the Cement ProductionAdditions in the Cement Production

Ordinary portland cement (since 1926) CP I-S 1 - 5% additions

Blastfurnace cement (since 1952)CP III 35 - 70% slag

Pozzolanic cement (since 1969)CP IV 15 - 50% pozzolans

Composite cement (since 1991)CP II-E 6 - 34% slagCP II-Z 6 - 14% pozzolansCP II-F 6 - 10% limestone

In accordance to Brazilian Standards*, addition of blastfurnace slag and fly ash to various types of cements is one of the major alternatives of the Brazilian cement industry to reduce emissions

* additions are incorporated to the clinker during the cement production

100

150

200

250

300

350

1990 1995 2000 2005 2008

302

201

172

Additions

Cement

Clinker

Index: 1990 = 100Source: SNIC

Emissions saved (2008)

about 15M tons CO2


COCO22 Cement Emissions (WBCSD – CSI) Cement Emissions (WBCSD – CSI)Preliminary CSI results pointed out Latin America (in major part, represented by Brazil) as one of the region with the lowest CO2 emissions/ton cement

The graph demonstrates the challenge for Brazil to enhance any further reductions

Recent studies by the IEA indicate that Brazilian cement industry, due to the levels already achieved and based on BAT, has little potential for reduction compared to other major producer countries


Challenge for Brazilian's cement industryChallenge for Brazilian's cement industry

The Brazilian cement industry has one of the lowest CO2 specific emission compared to the world’s average;

Brazil has yet a low per capita consumption (272 kg/inhab/year272 kg/inhab/year) compared to developed countries, and even more to those who are passing or already passed for a developing process and built their infrastructure base (over 1.000 1.000 kg/inhab/yearkg/inhab/year);

Brazil has important infrastructural programs to be implemented that cannot be postponed and cement is the basis for housing, hospitals, schools, sanitation, ports, airports, highways, railways, bridges, hydro power plants, etc.


The Brazilian Industry great challenge: The Brazilian Industry great challenge: Produce the cement for the infrastructure base Produce the cement for the infrastructure base

necessary for its development, maintaining low necessary for its development, maintaining low COCO22 specific emissions per ton of cement. specific emissions per ton of cement.

Challenge for Brazilian's cement industryChallenge for Brazilian's cement industry


Cement Sustainability Initiative Forum 2009‘Perspectives from around the world’:

Latin America

Maria José GarciaFICEM


FICEM-APCAC Industry Associates

DEDICATED TO MAKING A DIFFERENCE


FICEM-APCAC Institutes, Associations and Chambers



Federación Interamericana del Cemento FICEM-APCAC• 33 cement producers, 15 institutes and 6 associations among 26 countries

• GOVERNANCE Board of Directors: 11 countries and 8 companies represented Forums: Communications, Institutes and Technical Cement Production Work Commission: Housing, Roads, Education and Concrete Products

• OVERVIEW LATAM Statistics: Consumption 146 Million tons, with a share of 5,2% in a Global context * though 193 productions plants that have an installed capacity of 246 Million tons and an average growth of 5.5% in the region

• KEY ACHIEVEMENTS• Representation of all cement producers and countries of Latin America, Spain and Portugal• Establish an unifying vision of the industry in the long term• Develop a regional agenda of Events for the cement industry • Establish Alliances with similar association around the world (CEMBUREAU, PCA, ABCP, etc)• High summoning leverage• Create communication channels for the exchange of best practices within the members

*Includding China 2008

Federación Interamericana del Cemento FICEM-APCAC



LATAM Consumption 2008

LATAM Consumption 2009 WORLD

% of GlobalConsumption Kg per capitaNumber of plantsCapacity

Average growthAverage growth 2008 Average growth 2009 Average growth 2010

Exports Cement Imports Cement

GDP 2008 Population

GDP 2008 / 2007 % varGDP 2009 / 2008 % var

GDP 2010 / 2009 % var

GDP 2008 per capita

146 MT

139 MT2.787 MT5,2%250 kg/capita191246 MT

Average growth5,5%-4,9%-0,6%

8,0 MT3,9 MT

6.063 USD Bn583 m

3,80%-2,50%2,80%

10400 USD

LATAM INDUSTRY IN NUMBERS

Source: BNParibas



30

68

22 2

26

2

16

5

6

18

6

5

7

26


33 groups

193 plants

Cement Production Capacity: 246 M tons

ARGENTINABARBADOS

BOLIVIABRASILCHILE

COLOMBIACOSTA RICA

CUBAECUADOR

EL SALVADORGUATEMALA

HAITIHONDURAS

JAMAICAMARTINICA

MEXICONICARAGUA

PANAMAPERU

PORTUGALPUERTO RICO

REP DOMINICANATRINIDADURUGUAY

6

1

1



Key issues for the cement industryIssue

• Even though we are one region we have structural differences: legal and economical background, and development levels among others.

• Poverty in the region

• No regional statistics

• Low per capita consumption

• Low regional Infrastructure

Action being taken

• Establish common goals as one industry with regional outreach

• Invest in education, health and social projects to have a positive impact and benefit local communities around plants

• Create employment opportunities

• Collecting regional data

• Promote the use of cement products through FICEM-APCAC and local associations

• Alliances with governments and multilateral organisms for new projects and fundingFederación Interamericana del Cemento

FICEM-APCAC



Specific issue

• No specific regulations for CO2 emissions

• Low use of Alternative Fuels in the region

Action being taken

• Self regulation by producers in a responsable manner

• Investment in new equipment• Modified Cements• Carbon Dioxide (Co2) Protocol for the region

• Sharing best practices• Replace conventional fuels with alternative

fuels, including biomass• Co-processing large volumes of waste through

a valorization policy• Promote local rules and regulation


Key issues for the cement industryDEDICATED TO MAKING A DIFFERENCE


Expectations• To generate an exchange field with Latin American Industry, enabling the CSI to spread its knowledge, studies, research projects and protocols. • To create interaction grounds between the CSI, the academy and NGOs from FICEM member countries to raise awareness on the industry’s engagement towards environmental sustainability.• To promote the participation of new cement companies in the CSI.•To apply procedures and indexes for measuring the industry’s CO2-emission levels by region and country.• To share the best practices from the Cement industry among fellow countries and the rest of the world.• To schedule yearly forums for internal stakeholders on specialized subjects (Climate Change, Industry’s reputation, New Markets development, Sustainability and Plant Efficiency).• To collect regional data about Co2 Emissions in the region and develop a Co2 Protocol according to LATAM industry characteristic




Cement Sustainability Initiative Forum 2009‘Perspectives from around the world’: USA

Andy O’HarePortland Cement Association (PCA)



Portland Cement Association• Offices in Skokie, Illinois, and Washington, D.C.• 30 member companies • Large, multi-national companies are predominant

manufacturers • Represents 98% of capacity in United States• Represents 100% in Canada

• Since its founding in 1916, the Portland Cement Association has had the same mission: "Improve and expand the uses of portland cement and concrete."



Overview of U.S. Industry 2008• 116 clinker producing plants; 36 U.S. States• 167 cement kilns• Average clinker production: 584,000 tons

per kiln• Annual clinker capacity: 97.5 million metric

tons• Cement imports: 11.5 million metric tons• 17,280 cement industry employees



U.S. Cement Consumption (‘000 metric tonnes)

29

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

140,000

160,000

1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2015 2017 2019



Net U.S. Supply Balance (million metric tonnes)

30

Cement Consumption

Imp

ort

s: 2

5.6

MM

T

Cement Production Capacity



Key Achievements 2008-2009Focus Area Action

Strategic Planning Finalized and began implementation of new strategic plan focused on three areas: Market Promotion, Business Continuity (“Sustainable Profitability”) and Sustainable Development.

Renewed Focus on Pavement Promotion

Consolidated concrete pavement promotion efforts of various concrete associations under PCA

Aggressive Issue Advocacy

Addressed significant climate change, air emission issue and infrastructure investment opportunities and challenges

Integration of Regional Promotion Resources

Merged previously quasi-independent regional market promotion organizations into PCA to facilitate coordinated efforts

Creation of Imaging and Branding Campaign

Initiated a program to convey to various audiences the superior (sustainable) qualities of cement and concrete products; Launched alongside Federal advocacy efforts



U.S. Climate Developments• Legislative:

– House passed economy-wide cap and trade bill with 17% reduction in 2005 U.S. emissions by 2020, 83% by 2050

– Contains “rebate” program for energy intensive industries; 15% of program allowances; 100% of emission allowances up to industry average through 2026; phase down 10% per year through 2036

– Preempts state and regional programs– Senate drafting revisions to House bill

• Regulatory– PCA commented on EPA proposed greenhouse gas registry program in

April; final this fall– PCA commented on EPA “Endangerment Finding”



Expectations for the Future

• Limited industry growth through 2012; expanding concerns about potential trade imbalances

• Multi-faceted efforts to address climate change policy on the local, national and international fronts

• New opportunities to partner with other national cement associations on manufacturing challenges and market promotion opportunities

• More coordinated efforts globally to harmonize the management of sustainable development and its integration into national policies



Cement Sustainability Initiative Forum 2009‘Perspectives from around the world’: Europe

Vagner Maringolo CEMBUREAU


A FEW WORDS ABOUT CEMBUREAUCEMBUREAU, the European Cement Association based in Brussels, is the representative organisation of the cement industry in Europe

Today CEMBUREAU includes 28 Members (27 Full Members and 1 Associate Member)

Currently, its Full Members are the national cement industry associations and cement companies of the European Union (with the exception of Cyprus, Malta and Slovakia) plus Norway, Switzerland and Turkey. Croatia is an Associate Member of CEMBUREAU

35



FULL MEMBERS

AUSTRIA, BELGIUM,

BULGARIA, CZECH REP.,

DENMARK, ESTONIA,

FINLAND, FRANCE,

GERMANY, GREECE,

HUNGARY, IRELAND, ITALY,

LATVIA, LITHUANIA,

LUXEMBOURG,

NETHERLANDS, NORWAY,

POLAND, PORTUGAL,

ROMANIA, SLOVENIA,

SPAIN, SWEDEN,

SWITZERLAND, TURKEY,

UNITED KINGDOM

ASSOCIATE MEMBER

CROATIA

N

PL

CH

S

FIN

UK

IRL

EP I

F

BL

NLD

GR TR

A

CZ

ROH

EST

DK LV

SI HR

BG

LT

36



Governance structure

37

CEMBUREAU GENERAL ASSEMBLY

RESOURCES COMMITTEE BOARD + LIAISON COMMITTEE

CHIEF EXECUTIVE STEERING COMMITTEE

PUBLICAFFAIRS

MEMBERSPLENARY

GROUP

SENIORADVISORY

GROUP

SECRETARIAT

WG1

WG2

WG3

WG4

WG5

TFX

TFY

TFZ



• All the bodies below the Board – Liaison Committee are open to all CEMBUREAU Members

• The Working Groups and their Task Forces cover all the issues on the list approved by the CEMBUREAU Board

• Working Groups are permanent

• Task Forces are set up on an ad hoc basis

• … in all 360 people

GENERAL FEATURES

38



KEY CEMBUREAU FIGURESCEMBUREAU represents virtually 100% of cement production in its Members countries

CEMBUREAU% WORLD

≈ 11%

-

-

-

-

-

WORLD

2 830

-

-

-

-

-

2008

Production - Million tonnes

Consumption - Million tonnes

Trade - Million tonnes

Imports - Million tonnes

Exports - Million tonnes

Per capita consumption - kg

310

313

-

32

46

539

CEMBUREAU

254

265.9

-

-

-

-

EU 27

39



2.83 Billion tonnes

WORLD CEMENT PRODUCTION - 2008

40



Per capita consumption in CEMBUREAU countries

41

2008 - kg



EU ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS (1990 – 2008)

42



* Excluding energy and climate issues

Issue Achievement

EU ETS ReviewCement industry recognised as at risk of carbon leakage – free allocation on the basis of a benchmark (under cap)

GNR CEMBUREAU participation. Added value to advocacy.

BREF ReviewFinalised. Ambitious BATAELS. No split views. Outcome positive especially in terms of NOx and energy efficiency.

REACH Clinker exemption maintained, CEMBUREAU REACH implementation website, consortium

IPPC recast including revision of Incineration of Waste

NOx ELV, exemption for SO2 and COT maintainedELVs versus BATAELs: flexibility must be maintained. Second reading to come.

EU-Wide SO2 and NOx Trading Scheme CEMBUREAU study anticipating EC proposal for a Directive. Tool for advocacy.

43

Key achievements 2008 - 2009DEDICATED TO MAKING A DIFFERENCE


* Excluding energy and climate issues

Issue AchievementNew TF Biodiversity launchedCEMBUREAU participation in European Minerals Day

Case studies; websiteQuarry open days

Comprehensive Health Risk Study Moving ahead – 5 years programme

Waste Framework DirectiveFinalised. Implementation required. Co-processing in cement kilns clearly identified as recovery operation.

Crystalline silicaImplementation of the ESDA. First report showed high level of compliance (99.3%) in cement industry

Mercury CEMBUREAU and CSI joint report in view of cooperation with UNEP

Sustainable Construction and Production Avoid duplication of legislation. CEMBUREAU comprehensive action plan.

Involvement in standardisation work CEN TC 350, TC 51, TC 264 WG 1444

Key achievements 2008 - 2009DEDICATED TO MAKING A DIFFERENCE


RECENT PUBLICATIONS

45



RECENT WEBSITE DEVELOPEDREACH: reach.cembureau.eu

ECP: www.europeanconcrete.eu

Examples of low energy concrete buildings from across Europe and presents them in an accessible format.CASE STUDIES

46



Expectations for the near future• CEMBUREAU has and will continue to act as a spokesperson for

the cement industry on all relevant developments in relation to technical, environmental, energy and promotional issues at pan-European level, particularly vis-à-vis the Institutions of the European Union

• The engagement of Trade Associations in the CSI will strengthen the role of the cement sector by promoting the debate of issues amongst their members, helping in taking action and delivering results for continuous improvement and sustainability

• The CSI has helped to significantly improve the image of the cement industry among stakeholders

47



Cement Sustainability Initiative Forum 2009‘Perspectives from around the world’: Japan

Kenichi Maeda Japan Cement Association (JCA)



49

1. Overview of JCA

Member 18 Companies

Plant 32 Plants

Kiln Total : 57

Capacity63.4 million tons(clinker basis)

Production (FY2008)

(Unit: million tons)

Portland cement 46.6

Blended cement 14.2

Exported Clinker 4.9

Total 65.7

Domestic Consumption (FY2008)

50.1 million tons



50

2. Cement Market in Japan

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

1970 75 80 85 90 95 2000 05 08

Cement production

Domestic demand(including imported cement)

Export

Peak production at 99.3(FY 1996)

Peak demand at 86.3(FY 1990)

(FY)

(million tons)



51

Two laws stipulate obligations to report all the data such as energy consumption and CO2 emissions for Government to take appropriate measures and policies. Energy Conservation Law (METI) The Act to promote the Rational Use of Energy

Global Warming Law (MOE) The Act on Promotion of Global Warming Measures

All the facility with more than 3,000t-CO2/yr emissionsMust report CO2 emission

3. Energy/Climate Policies in Japan

All the entity of more than 1,500kl/yr(Crude oil base) energy consumption must report energy consumption



52Fiscal 1990 Fiscal 2007 Fiscal 2010 (forecast)

Industry ▲2.3%

Offices & others

Household

Transportation+14.6%

+43.8%

+29%

CO2

emissions Total +14.0%

Currently, substantial reduction is required to achieve the Kyoto TargetKyoto National target :-6%

4. Voluntary Initiative 2008 -12

Emission of Industry are declining steadily due to Voluntary Initiative

Substantial increase by sectors as Offices and others, Household and transportation

CO2 Emissions in Japan by Sector



53

Key actions in the cement industryVoluntary Action Plans １ ) Improving energy efficiency

・ Installation and replacement of energy- 　　efficient equipment・ development of clean technologies.

2) Increase of alternative fuels such as waste tires and waste plastics

Further action 3) Increase of blended cement

5. Voluntary Initiative 2008 - 12



54

Voluntary Cement Sector Target : 3.8% reduction of energy intensity by 2008 – 2012. (vs. base year 1990)

Energy : Fossil fuels and purchased electricity (excluding alternative fuels) Cement Production : Cement + exported clinker

All cement plants in Japan participated

6. Voluntary Initiative 2008 - 12



55

3,5863,562

3,550 3,525 3,504 3,499 3,463 3,438 3,407 3,4133,478 3,458 3,451

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

90 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 2010

Year

7. Results of Voluntary Initiative Energy intensity of the cement industry



56

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07

[kg/ t-cem.][104t]

Cement ProductionUsed AFR

Specific consumptionof AFR

8. Result of Voluntary Initiative

AFRs used in the cement industry



57

In Japan, blended cement is mainly used for infrastructure. In architecture, blended cement is not popular because its

early-stage strength is lower than that of ordinary portland cement.

Challenge : This is the

barrier we have to break through

to increase blended cement

ratio

22.4%23.4% 22.9% 22.7%

21.6% 21.8%20.8% 20.8%

24.8%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2010

The Kyoto Target Achievement Plan

Increase of blended cement ratio

9. Further action



58

10. International Collaboration

• Sectoral Approach Position Paper ofCembureau, PCA and JCA

• APP (Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean development and Climate)

• Technical support in emerging countries• Communication on key cement issues and

international framework



59

11. About Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate (APP)

http://www.asiapacificpartnership.org/

Objectives:

Estimate regional/national reduction potentials

Identify opportunities and barriers to promote the diffusion of clean technologies

Cement Task Force

CTF

*more than 60% of world cement production



60

Cement Industryin APP countries

Advisory Committee

(all partners)

Led by: Aus., China

COE(Flagship)

Status Report Benchmarking Legal and Regulatory Barriers Product Application

Co-generation Hazardous Wastes (Flagship) Biomass Fuel CO2 Sink Effect

Performance 　 Diagnosis (Flagship)

data

information

information

New TechnologiesBest and good

Practices

Survey and Analytical Proj.

Demonstrative Proj. R&D proj.

11.2. APP: Project Formation of Cement Task Force

Capacity Building by COEPolicy Seminar ＆ CSI Protocol Training

Workshop,Zhuhai,China(2008)

Policy Workshop in Seoul,Korea(2009)


61

Cement Project Flagship project

1.Status report

2. Benchmarking

3. Legal / regulatory barriers & incentives

4. Application of concrete

5. Centre of Excellence (at China Building Materials Academy, Beijing)

6. Kiln Co-generation (demonstration project)

7. Hazardous Wastes, Co- processing & Management

8. High-energy Biomass Fuels (demo. project)

9. Concrete as CO2 Sink (demo. project)

10. Performance Diagnosis

11.3. APP: Action Plans



62

Thank You


Cement Sustainability Initiative Forum 2009São Paulo, Brazil

‘Perspectives from around the world’1 September 2009


Annex Slides (CEMBUREAU)


ISSUE COST MARKET

RISK CONSTRAINT

IMAGE ACTIONSTIMESCALE

RESOURCES PRIORITY

LEVEL

WHY

WHAT

65

CSI Forum – Sept 09 - VM

R

A

W

M

A

T

E

R

I

A

L

S

MonitorShort Term

Internal

*Habitats Directive

1 Year RMSG*

Sustainability Criteria inExtractive Industries

MonitorLong Term

Internal +NEEIP + CEPMC * *

Sustainable Use of Natural Resources

Medium Term NEEIP* *

Soil Protection

On-goingInternal +CEPMC * *

Groundwater Directive

On-goingInternal +

NEEIP * *Biodiversity

Access to (+ tax) Raw Materials

MonitorShort Term

Internal +NEEIP * *


ISSUE COST MARKET

RISK CONSTRAINT


RESOURCES PRIORITY

LEVEL

WHY

WHAT

66


* *Energy Supply Short Term Power Intensive

Industries Alliance

E

N

E

R

G

Y

* *Energy Efficiency in Buildings

Medium Term Internal + ECP

* * *Electricity Prices Short Term

Energy Intensive Industries Alliance

* *Sustainable Energy Feb. 09

With European

Commission

(* * *)Taxation of Energy Product

On-going Internal + NACE AEIIs


ISSUE COST MARKET

RISK CONSTRAINT


RESOURCES PRIORITY

LEVEL

WHY

WHAT

67


C

L

I

M

A

T

E

C

H

A

N

G

E

Follow up International Agreement

ImmediateDec 09-

Deadline

ACEI, BusinessEurop

e,AEIIs

* *

ImmediateBenchmark for free allocation

Internal WG1+ SAG+MPG+AEII

s

2nd half 0930 June 2010-

DeadlineImporters in Scheme

* * *Allies?

Reliance on external

resources

30 June 2010- Deadline

Auctioning* *

Internal WG1+ SAG+MPG

31 Dec 2010-Deadline

Work to start in 2009

Definition of New Entrants

* *Internal WG1+

AEIIs

Internal WG1 + WG2 TF Elect.

At EU level; Companies at national level

State Aids for Electricity * *Long TermPreparation start

09

Carbon LeakageImmediate31 Dec 09-Deadline

AEIIs* * *

* * *


ISSUE COST MARKET

RISK CONSTRAINT


RESOURCES PRIORITY

LEVEL

WHY

WHAT

68


C

L

I

M

A

T

E

C

H

A

N

G

E

Monitoring & Reporting Reg.

31 Dec 2011-Deadline

Internal WG1*

MonitorMedium Term

CO2 Tax(* * *)

Internal + AEIIs

Consensus + Advocacy

Short TermJI & CDM

* *WBCSD-CSI

Short TermCO2 Emissions - GNR* * *

Internal

On-goingAdaptation to Climate Change * *

Internal

CCS Long Term External *

Programme of Standards GHG Emissions in EIIs

Short Term CEN/TC264/WG33 * *

Domestic ProjectsLong Term

Preparation start 09

Internal WG1+WG2 * *

Sectoral Approach Through CSI+ contact with other cement

assoc. worldwide09 & long term * *

Inclusion of Maritime/River Transport

Monitor: short term

Action: Long term

Internal WG1*


ISSUE COST MARKET

RISK CONSTRAINT


RESOURCES PRIORITY

LEVEL

WHY

WHAT

69


W

A

S

T

E

Waste Action Plan Internal + Bought-in * * *

Medium Term2 - 5 years

AdvocacyShort Term

Internal CEPMC

Construction & Demolition Waste * *

Waste pretreatmentMonitor

Alliance with

EUCOPRO * *

Short-Medium Term

InternalIncineration of Waste Directive- Revision

* * *

Short Term Internal

+ EUCOPRO

Waste Framework Directive – ImplementationEnd of Waste

* * *


ISSUE COST MARKET

RISK CONSTRAINT


RESOURCES PRIORITY

LEVEL

WHY

WHAT

70


E

M

I

S

S

I

O

N

S

Dust (PM10, PM2.5) Internal* * *

ConsensusLong Term

AdvocacyMedium Term

Revision BREF for Cement Internal * * *

AdvocacyMedium Term

POPs Convention BAT/BEPExpert Group

CSI + ICIN (* *)

ShortMedium Term

National Emission Ceilings Directive Revision

Internal * *

Immediate Action

NOx & SOx Trading NOx & SOx Alliance * * *

IPPC Recast Internal* * *

Short Term

Short TermMercury Emissions With CSI

* * *EMEP / CORINAIR Short Term Lars Hjorth * *


ISSUE COST MARKET

RISK CONSTRAINT


RESOURCES PRIORITY

LEVEL

WHY

WHAT

71


P

R

O

D

U

C

T

S

AdvocacyMedium Term

InternalAlliance andConsultant

Eurocodes* *

Short Termover 3-5 years

Internal + Bought-in +

ECP

Fire Safety* * *

ConsensusShort Term

Internal +CEPMC

Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) * *

Environmental Performance of Products

Internal * * *Study

Short Term

Lead MarketsInternal *On-going

Sustainable Construction Internal + External * * *On-going

EPDB Revision ECF + Euroace *On-going


ISSUE COST MARKET

RISK CONSTRAINT


RESOURCES PRIORITY

LEVEL

WHY

WHAT

H

E

A

L

T

H

&

S

A

F

E

T

Y

Radiations Internal+ CEPMC

* *

MonitorOn-goingpro-active

ShortTerm

Nationalnegotiations

ESDA Crystalline SilicaImplementation * * *

MediumTerm

InternalGlobally Harmonised SystemGHS

* *

MediumTerm

InternalCobalt / Nickel (* * *)

ShortTerm

InternalCorrosiveness (* * *)

ImmediateAction

Internal+ Bought-in

ComprehensiveHealth Risk Study * * *

REACH implementation

Internal + CEFIC + FEBIS

REACH Alliance

* * *Advocacy

Short + Long Term

72



ISSUE COST MARKET

RISK CONSTRAINT


RESOURCES PRIORITY

LEVEL

WHY

WHAT

73


LEGAL

Environmental Crimes Internal

*Monitor

Short Term


ISSUE COST MARKET

RISK CONSTRAINT


RESOURCES PRIORITY

LEVEL

WHY

WHAT

74


S

T

A

N

D

A

R

D

S

Revision Cement Standard Internal

* *ImplementShort Term

Concrete in Contact with Drinking Water

Internal+ Alliance * *

MonitorLong Term

LeachingInternal

+ Bought-in+ CEN * *

MediumTerm

Sustainable Construction Internal

* *On-going

CPD Rev - CPR Internal+ CEPMC

* *Advocacy immediate

Sulfate Resisting Cement Internal

* *Immediate

Revision Concrete Standard EN 206

Internal

* *Short - Medium

Term


ISSUE COST MARKET

RISK CONSTRAINT


RESOURCES PRIORITY

LEVEL

WHY

WHAT

75


O

T

H

E

R

Internal +ACEI +

BUSINESSEUROPE

CompetitivenessOn-going

* *

On-going Internal + Alliances

Market Based Instruments * *

Documents

Dedicated to Making a Difference DEDICATED TO MAKING A DIFFERENCE Cement Sustainability Initiative Forum 2009 São Paulo, Brazil ‘Perspectives from around