Upload
crescent
View
42
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Defenses in Tort Cases. Intro to Law 2009-2010 Androstic. Objectives:. 43. Identify defenses that can be made for intentional torts. 44. Describe defenses for defamation. 45. Identify the elements that make up negligence. 46. Recognize defenses for negligence suits. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Intro to Law2009-2010Androstic
43. Identify defenses that can be made for intentional torts.
44. Describe defenses for defamation.
45. Identify the elements that make up negligence.
46. Recognize defenses for negligence suits.
47. Identify what is needed to prove strict liability.
48. Recognize defenses to strict liability cases.
One may sue for any of the following forms of damages:
Compensatory damages
Nominal damages
Punitive damages
When accused of an intentional tort, there are two general defenses that a defendant can make:
Consent – plaintiff consented to the act
Privilege – justified conduct, such as self defense
Defamation?
Defamation is when a person makes a false statement to a third party causing harm to the plaintiff. Think of this as harming the reputation of someone by making a false statement about them.
Types of defamation:
Slander – oral statementsLibel – written defamation
Defenses for defamation?
-proving the statement is true-opinions are protected
There are four elements that must be proven to win a case involving a negligent tort.
1.Duty – a responsibility owed by the defendant
2.Breach of duty – failure to complete owed duty
3.Causation – breach of duty caused plaintiff’s harm
4.Damages – causation caused damages to the plaintiff
Contributory negligence – plaintiff is also somewhat negligent, so they can claim no damages
Comparative negligence – plaintiff is some % at fault, and cannot claim full amount of damages
Assumption of the risk – plaintiff voluntarily encounters known danger and accepted the risk
Immune – some people are immune from negligent lawsuits, such as gov’t officials or family members
Unlike negligent torts, where duty, breach, causation, and damages.
For strict liability, you only need to prove causation and damages.
However, you must also convince the court that the activity that caused the harm is unreasonably dangerous.
When accused of strict liability cases, you can use the following defenses:
the plaintiff should have to prove negligence
There is no causation or no damages
The plaintiff has misused the product