2

Click here to load reader

Del Rosario v Ferrer

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

case digest

Citation preview

Page 1: Del Rosario v Ferrer

Del Rosario v. Ferrer20 Sept 2010

FACTS: (Doctrine: Irrevocability of the donation is the standard that identifies the donation as inter vivos. It is a quality absolutely incompatible with the idea of conveyances mortis causa.)

Spouses A and B executed a document entitled “Donation Mortis Causa” in favor of their 2 children C and D, and their granddaughter E. The Deed of Donation stated that, “it is our will that this donation mortis causa shall be irreovocable and shall be respected by the surviving spouse.”

Although denominated as a donation mortis causa, which in law is equivalent to a will, the deed has no attestation clause and was witnessed only by two persons.

Before the death of donor A, he executed a deed of assignment of his rights and interest in the subject property to their daughter C. subsequently, granddaughter E filed a petition for the probate of the deed of donation mortis causa in the RTC. C opposed the petition, invoking A’s assignment of his rights to her. Decision was rendered by the RTC, ordering the registration of the property in the name of the donees in equal shares. The court ruled that the donation was one made inter vivos, thus the assignment of A of his

rights was void. CA reversed the decision of the RTC and ruled that the donation, being one given mortis causa, did not comply with the requirements of a notarial will, rendering the same void.

ISSUE:

Whether or not the donation of spouses A and B to their children C and D and granddaughter E was a donation mortis causa, as it was denominated, or in fact a donation inter vivos.

DECISION:

The fact that the document in question was denominated as a “Donation mortis causa” is not controlling if a donation by its terms is inter vivos. Irrevocability of the donation is the standard that identifies the donation as inter vivos. It is a quality absolutely incompatible with the idea of conveyances mortis causa.

In the case at bar, donors A and B intended to make the donation irrevocable, as stated in the provisions of the Deed. Thus, the donation was on reality inter vivos. Thus, given that the donation was indeed inter vivos, A’s subsequent assignment of his rights and interests in the property to C is void.

ADDITIONAL DOCTRINE

Page 2: Del Rosario v Ferrer

A donation mortis causa has the following characteristics:

1. It conveys no title or ownership to the transferee before the death of the transferor; or, what amounts to the same thing, that the transferor should retain the ownership (full or naked) and control of the property while alive;

2. That before his death, the transfer should be revocable by the transferor at will, ad nutum; but revocability may be provided for indirectly by means of a reserved power in the donor to dispose of the properties conveyed; and

3. That the transfer should be void if the transferor should survive the transferee.