Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Texas Alliance for Water Conservation
Glenn Schur, Producer Board Chair
Demonstrated
Water Conservation
Funded by:
Gassert, Francis, et. al. (January 2013). Aqueduct Metadata
Document. World Resources Institute. Retrieved from
http://www.wri.org/publication/aqueduct-global-maps-20
Reprinted by permission from Nature Publishing Group: [Nature Climate Change,
J.S. Famiglietti, The global groundwater crisis, VOL 4, November 2014), copyright (2014).
www.nature.com/natureclimatechange
Ogallala Aquifer
Aquifer covers 174,000 square miles across 8 states in the High Plains of the United States.
Over 95% water pumped for irrigated agriculture.
Texas South Plains on southern end of aquifer and is an intensive agricultural production area and focus of this program.
USGS, Scientific Investigations Report 2014-5218
Hale & Floyd
Counties
USGS, Scientific Investigations Report 2014-5218
Hale & Floyd
Counties
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
Perc
ent
of
2003 w
ate
r volu
me
Year of measurement in January
TAWC Project Area (97,900 acres)
Change in water storage in TAWC Project area
Data provided by High Plains
Underground Water Conservation
District No. 1. Lubbock, TX
220
230
240
250
260
270
280
290
300
310
Depth
to w
ate
r (f
eet)
Date
Cropping Year
Static water level following
Data provided by High Plains
Underground Water Conservation
District No. 1. Lubbock, TX
2012 2013 2014
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
Depth
to w
ate
r (f
eet)
DateData provided by High Plains
Underground Water Conservation
District No. 1. Lubbock, TX
Steady decline
Develop and Demonstrate new technologies and management tools and strategies that result in less water being used with enhanced profitability.
2004 - Senate Bill 1053 appropriated $6.2M funded for 8 years (2005-2012) and extended through April 2014 administered through TWDB.
2014 - State of Texas renewed funding for additional $3.6M for 5 years (2014-2019) and project expansion administered through TWDB.
Project Objectives
Identify effective crop and irrigation systems.
Impact producer decision-making.
Project is Producer Driven and Board Directed.
CottonMonocultures
Cotton-Cattle Grass-cattle
CornCotton
Grain SorghumCotton
Specialty Crops
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
2005
(4289 ac.)
2006
(4230 ac.)
2007
(4087 ac.)
2008
(3967 ac.)
2009
(3991 ac.)
2010
(4272 ac.)
2011
(4133 ac.)
2012
(4732 ac.)
2013
(4941 ac.)
Acre
s
Cotton Corn - all Sorghum - all Perennial forage
Grazed acres Small grains Other
Year
(total acres)
Rainfall
Temperature
Water applied
Netirrigate
Soil moisture
AquaSpy
Crop Sense
Aqua Check
Production inputs
Plant & animal yields
Economic analysis
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Cotton Corn, grain Sorghum, grain Grass seed/hay Grazing-
perr. grass
Irri
gati
on, in
ches
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
2010 2011 2012 2013
Sprinkler
Sub-surface drip
Furrow
Dryland
VRIPMDITM
Capacitance Probes
Metering
Smartfield
Field Walks
Span comparisons of different water application configurations
Spray PMDI LEPA
Irrigation management using canopy
temperature as a trigger for irrigation
4”-20” zones
wetting up with
drip turned on
Rainfall stored
moisture all the
way to 48”
Held 1st Annual TAWC Water College
Planning 2nd Annual
late Jan. 2016
Field Walks – County Expansion
Castro
Hall
Hockley
Hale
World Wide Web www.tawcsolutions.org
Free expanding tools for crop and
irrigation management
Web-based tool used:
As a planning aid for various crop/water scenarios.
To capture changes in commodity price, water availability, and production costs.
To generate several options which maximize net returns/acre.
www.tawcsolutions.org
Wind at
2 meters
Over 80 West
Texas Mesonet
Stations and
expanding
Web-based tool used to determine:
When to apply water.
How much water to apply.
How to achieve specific management goals.
www.tawcsolutions.org
% Crop water demand
Lb
sp
er
ac
re
May 1
May 15June 1June 15
Spray LEPA
Spray Mode LEPA Mode
Spray mode is slow to
wet up soil
LEPA is quicker to wet
up soil
2013LEPA LESA
PER ACRE GROSS INCOME Quantity Total Quantity Total
Cotton lint 1165 $ 873.75 1028 $ 771.00
Cotton seed 0.84 $ 235.19 0.74 $ 207.53
PER ACRE TOTAL GROSS INCOME $ 1,108.94 $ 978.53
PER ACRE TOTAL OF ALL COST $ 924.94 $ 906.33
PER ACRE NET PROJECTED RETURNS $ 184.00 $ 72.20
Percent Increase 155%
APPLIED - INCHES 16.5
Lint lbs per acre-in of water applied 70.6 62.3
Percent Increase 13.3%
LEPA LESA
Maximizing Water Use Efficiency and Profitability
The Goal Of Production Agriculture
Texas Alliance for Water Conservation
Funded by: