19
Evaluation of Cracking Resistance of Superpave Mixtures Using Texas Overlay Test Syeda Rubaiyat Aziz Mustaque Hossain Greg Schieber Department of Civil Engineering Kansas State University

Department of Civil Engineering Kansas State University

  • Upload
    mimis

  • View
    30

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Evaluation of Cracking Resistance of Superpave Mixtures Using Texas Overlay Test. Syeda Rubaiyat Aziz Mustaque Hossain Greg Schieber. Department of Civil Engineering Kansas State University. Outline . Background Objective Materials & Test Method Laboratory Testing Results - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Department of  Civil  Engineering Kansas State University

Evaluation of Cracking Resistance of Superpave Mixtures Using Texas

Overlay TestSyeda Rubaiyat AzizMustaque Hossain

Greg Schieber

Department of Civil EngineeringKansas State University

Page 2: Department of  Civil  Engineering Kansas State University

Outline ● Background● Objective● Materials & Test Method● Laboratory Testing● Results● Conclusions & Recommendations● Acknowledgements

2

Page 3: Department of  Civil  Engineering Kansas State University

Research Background● About 94% of paved road in the United States is Hot-Mix

Asphalt (HMA)

● Annual HMA production is about 500-550 million tons

● Reasons for increased use of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP):

Rise in oil price, emphasis on sustainability, limited virgin aggregate availability

● High RAP content sometimes leads to drier mix, prone to early cracking

Page 4: Department of  Civil  Engineering Kansas State University

Objective● Investigate cracking resistance of Superpave mixtures

with varying RAP content

● Investigate effect of RAP source on cracking resistance

Page 5: Department of  Civil  Engineering Kansas State University

Materials & Test Method● Materials: Superpave 12.5-mm NMAS mixture with

PG 70-28

Five virgin aggregates

Three RAP contents (20%, 30% and 40%)

Two sources

● Test: Texas Overlay Test and Semi-Circular Bending Test

Page 6: Department of  Civil  Engineering Kansas State University

Aggregate BlendingSR-12.5A (with RAP)

0

20

40

60

80

100

Sieve Size (mm)

% Pa

ssin

g

0.45 Power Gradation Chart for SR-12.5A (RAP Source 1)

20%30%40%

0

20

40

60

80

100

Sieve Size (mm)

% Pa

ssin

g

0.45 Power Gradation Chart for SR-12.5A (RAP Source 2)

20%30%40%

First RAP source(Shiling)

Second RAP source(Konza)

Page 7: Department of  Civil  Engineering Kansas State University

Texas Overlay Test (TEX-248-F)● Simulates opening or closing of joints, which

accelerates crack initiation and propagation● Controlled displacement mode● Test performed at 25° C

Page 8: Department of  Civil  Engineering Kansas State University

Texas Overlay Test (Cont…)

Courtesy: TTI manual Tex-248-F

• After cutting, air void is checked (7±1)%, then glued on base plates

• 3 replicates from each Mixture

Page 9: Department of  Civil  Engineering Kansas State University

Texas Overlay Test (Cont…)

Gluing• Attaching to base plates using

Epoxy glue• 8 hours curing

Placement• Placing in side OT jig • LVDT attached at

back

Test Input

• Cyclic triangular loading @ 10 sec/cycles

• Fixed opening displacement 0.025 inch

Termination• Load reduction to 93%

of initial load or 1000 cycles

Output• Initial load• % of load

reduction• No of OT

cycles of failure

Page 10: Department of  Civil  Engineering Kansas State University

Semi-circular Bending Test (SCB)● Half disc shaped (3’’ diameter, 2’’

thick)● Must satisfy 7±1 % air void ● Notched at bottom● Three point bending setup● Loaded in compression● Test temperature at 25° C● 3 Static & 12 Cyclic test specimens

for each mixture

Page 11: Department of  Civil  Engineering Kansas State University

SCB Test (Cont…)

s = 0.8 R

Static

• Static load applied @ 0.05 inch/min on 3 replicates

Peak Load

• Average of the Peak Failure load from Static tests recorded

Cyclic

• Cyclic haversine load applied @ 10 Hz frequency with no rest period

Cyclic Input

• 30%, 40%, 50% & 60% of Avg. Peak Static load given as inputs & 3 specimen tested for each

Output • Load, Duration and No. of Cycles to failure

  

2S

2R

S = 0.8 R

Page 12: Department of  Civil  Engineering Kansas State University

Results

Page 13: Department of  Civil  Engineering Kansas State University

Results (Overlay Test)

0100200300400500600700800900

1000

Source_RAP %_Asphalt %

Cycl

es R

esis

ted

Unti

l Fai

lure

Page 14: Department of  Civil  Engineering Kansas State University

Repetitive SCB Test

20 30 40 50 60 700

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

SCB Percent Load Relationship Curve (SR-12.5A)

20% RAP30% RAP40% RAP

Percentage of Maximum Static Load (%)

SCB

Load

Rep

etitio

ns to

Cra

ck F

ailu

re

20 30 40 50 60 700

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000Konza RAPShiling RAP

Page 15: Department of  Civil  Engineering Kansas State University

Statistical AnalysisComparison of Means

SR-12.5A (Shilling RAP)

RAP% 40 30 20

Asphalt% 4.3 4.8 4.7

Groups* a a a

SR-12.5A (Konza RAP)

RAP% 30 20 40

Asphalt% 4.4 4.3 4.1

Groups* a a b

SR-12.5A (Shilling RAP)

RAP% 40 30 20

Asphalt% 4.3 4.8 4.7

Groups* a b c

SR-12.5A (Konza RAP)

RAP% 30 20 40

Asphalt% 4.4 4.3 4.1

Groups* a b b

*Mix types not connected by same letter have statistical significant difference

R-SCB Test OT Test

Page 16: Department of  Civil  Engineering Kansas State University

Conclusions● Based on the Texas Overlay test results:

Increase in RAP content reduces cracking resistance Overall, mixtures with first RAP source carried higher no. of OT cycles prior

to failure compared to second RAP source

● Based on SCB test results: Similar trend of results as OT tests were obtained 20% RAP performed well for first RAP source and 40% RAP performed well

for second RAP source

Page 17: Department of  Civil  Engineering Kansas State University

Recommendations

● Study more RAP sources ● Correlate cracking test results with actual field data

Page 18: Department of  Civil  Engineering Kansas State University

Acknowledgements

● This study has been sponsored by the Kansas Department of Transportation (KDOT)

Page 19: Department of  Civil  Engineering Kansas State University

Thank You!