Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION SCIENCE
DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE
INFO 490 - SENG 490 – COSC 480 DISSERTATION
COURSE OUTLINE
Full Year, 2020
2
PAPER DESCRIPTION AND AIMS ..................................................................................... 3 Prescriptions .......................................................................................................................................3 Objectives ............................................................................................................................................3
COURSE DELIVERY ............................................................................................................. 3 Classes.................................................................................................................................................3 Teaching Staff ......................................................................................................................................3
ASSESSMENT ......................................................................................................................... 4
SCHEDULE OF MAJOR DELIVERABLES ....................................................................... 4 Research Proposal ..............................................................................................................................4 Presentation One .................................................................................................................................5 Literature Review ................................................................................................................................5 Presentation Two ................................................................................................................................5 Dissertation (For marking) .................................................................................................................5 Dissertation (Final copy) ....................................................................................................................5
STUDENT LEARNING SUPPORT AND INFORMATION .............................................. 6 Student Charter ...................................................................................................................................6 Guidelines for Learning at Otago .......................................................................................................6 Student Learning Centre .....................................................................................................................6 Library Support ...................................................................................................................................6 Māori Student Support ........................................................................................................................7 Pacific Islands’ Student Academic Advisor (Part-time) ......................................................................7 Disability Information and Support ....................................................................................................7
APPROACH TO TEACHING AND LEARNING ............................................................... 7 Research Methods Classes ..................................................................................................................8 Supervised Research Project ...............................................................................................................8 Dissertation .........................................................................................................................................9 Presentations .....................................................................................................................................10 Computer Science/Information Science Seminar Series ...................................................................10
EXPECTATIONS AND WORKLOAD ............................................................................... 10
COURSE RESOURCES ........................................................................................................ 11 Textbooks...........................................................................................................................................11
RESEARCH ETHICS AND TRUTHFULNESS ................................................................. 11
CONCERNS ABOUT THE COURSE ................................................................................. 11
DISCLAIMER ........................................................................................................................ 11
APPENDIX I TOPIC OUTLINE (STRUCTURE) ............................................................ 12
APPENDIX III RESEARCH PROPOSAL CHECKLIST - GUIDELINE...................... 13
APPENDIX IV LITERATURE REVIEW CHECKLIST ................................................. 17
APPENDIX V DISSERTATION CHECKLIST ................................................................ 19
APPENDIX VI PRESENTATION GUIDELINES ............................................................ 23
APPENDIX VII DISSERTATION TITLE PAGE AND DECLARATION TEMPLATES ......................................................................................................................... 24
3
PAPER DESCRIPTION AND AIMS
Prescriptions INFO490 - A supervised research project on an approved topic leading to the production of a dissertation.
SENG490 - A practical research project on a topic of interest. A written report, including a literature review associated with a topic of interest, will be the principal output of the paper.
COSC 480 – A full-year project, generally individual, carried out under the supervision of one or more staff members
Objectives Upon successful completion of this paper, you should be able to:
• Carry out a self-contained piece of research under supervision using appropriate methods and practices in Information Science.
• Critically evaluate your own and others’ research.
COURSE DELIVERY
Classes Seminar Day/Time: Friday 10.00am – 11.50am Room: OBS 3.26 Lectures, Tutorials and/or Labs: None. All content is delivered in the style of interactive seminars.
Student participation is expected.
Teaching Staff
COURSE COORDINATOR AND TEACHING STAFF
Course Co-ordinator Information Science: Name: Prof Holger Regenbrecht Office: OBS 09.07 Email: [email protected] Office Hours: Tuesdays 2:00 – 3:00 pm
(You are welcome to make an appointment. Please contact Heather Cooper <[email protected]>)
Course Co-ordinator Computer Science: Name: Dr Lech Szymanski Office: Owheo Building, Room 2.49 Email: [email protected] You should contact the Course Coordinator with any administrative enquiries about the paper.
Remember that the principal responsibility for advice with regard to your research project remains with your supervisor. However, please feel free to consult Prof Regenbrecht, as needed. Please make an appointment beforehand where possible.
4
ASSESSMENT Component % Total Performance Measure Evaluator(s) Research proposal 10% Content, clarity, and citations. Course Teaching
Staff Presentation 1 (Literature Review)
5% Complies with presentation requirements.
Course Teaching Staff
Presentation 2 (Research Outcome)
5% Complies with presentation requirements.
Course Teaching Staff
Dissertation (1st Marker)
40%
Content and quality of research as presented in the dissertation and the standard of presentation of the document,
Supervisor
Dissertation (2nd Marker)
40% Content and quality of research as presented in the dissertation and the standard of presentation of the document.
An INFO|COSC academic appointed by the Course Coordinator
Dissertations and other 400 level major deliverables are subject to the scrutiny of an external examiner appointed by the University.
HONOURS
A minimum of 80% is needed for INFO490 if a student is to be considered eligible for First Class Honours. (Note that grades from all the Honours papers are averaged and 80% or more is required across these papers for First Class Honours.) First Class Honours will not be granted to anyone who fails to meet the deadline (below) for submitting their dissertation to be marked. Further, an 'incomplete' result will be sent to Registry for any student who fails to meet the deadline (below) for submitting their final dissertation copies ready for binding.
SCHEDULE OF MAJOR DELIVERABLES Major deliverables should only be submitted after having first been shown to, discussed with, and approved by your supervisor. If a document is asked to be submitted to Course Teaching Staff, please send it in PDF format.
Research Proposal This is a document describing the intended research project in detail. It should provide a description of the proposed research sufficient for its purpose, method, validity, and the likelihood of its successful completion to be evaluated by a third party. Refer to Appendix III Research Proposal Checklist while writing the proposal. Hand in your completed checklist with the proposal.
In effect, the Research Proposal is a formal plan for your project. As your project progresses you will almost certainly need to change your plan (but not resubmit the Research Proposal for marking). Do this in consultation with your supervisor.
Due 5 pm Friday 15 May (email to HR)
5
Presentation One Here you present knowledge gleaned from the research literature—in relation to your project. This presentation is intended to give you an opportunity to get feedback from other researchers on your Literature Review. (See Appendix VI Presentation Guidelines.)
2:00 – 4:50 pm Friday 24 July – Room OBS 3.26
Literature Review An extensive review of work already undertaken on the topic as published in academic journals, conference proceedings, trade magazines, technical reports, and on the Internet. The literature review must relate to your research —it is not acceptable for you to simply write up everything you read on the topic. The number of references cited should fall somewhere between 20 and 40 with full citations and references for each work in an appropriate format. This review is expected to be very close to the final Literature Review section of your dissertation. Refer to Appendix IV Literature Review Checklistwhile writing the review.
TBA after candidate consults with supervisor(s) – Recommend after mid-July
Presentation Two In this final presentation you describe your completed research project and its results. This provides you with an opportunity to get feedback from other researchers prior to submitting your dissertation. (See Appendix VI Presentation Guidelines.)
2:00 – 4:50 pm Friday 25 September – Room OBS 3.26
Dissertation (For marking) A PDF version of your dissertation for marking by your supervisor and a second marker should be emailed to HR. Also, paper version should be printed out and delivered to the Course Coordinator for later review by an external examiner. For dissertation requirements see below (under the Dissertation section) and Appendix V Dissertation Checklist.
Due 9 a.m. Friday 9 October (To the Course Coordinator)
Dissertation (Final copy) If you wish to have your dissertation bound, one copy of the finished document (incorporating any minor changes recommended by your supervisor and the second marker) should be printed out and delivered to the Information Science Receptionist ready for binding. Your supervisor must approve and sign off the changes made prior to final submission.
The bound copy will be paid for by the department and is yours to keep. You pay for any additional copies. (Arrangements for binding are made by the Department.)
6
An electronic copy (pdf) of the final, corrected dissertation will, at the Head of Department’s discretion, be placed on the School of Business Digital Repository. A consent form authorising this placement should be handed in with the dissertation copy. A blank form is attached as Appendix VIII.
If you do not wish to have your dissertation bound, then all that is required is the electronic copy (pdf) of the finished document (incorporating any minor changes recommended by your supervisor and the second marker) referred to in the previous paragraph.
Due 3pm Friday 30 October (To Information Science Receptionist)
STUDENT LEARNING SUPPORT AND INFORMATION
Student Charter http://www.otago.ac.nz/about/otago005275.html
Guidelines for Learning at Otago http://hedc.otago.ac.nz/hedc/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Guidelines-for-Learning.pdf http://hedc.otago.ac.nz/hedc/learning/
Student Learning Centre The Student Learning Centre, which is part of the Higher Education Development Centre, provides learning support, free of charge, to ALL enrolled students. Their services include: • a workshop programme designed to help students to improve their learning strategies and their
generic skills; • individual assistance with learning issues; • on-line study skills advice; • a student leadership programme • a student-led peer support programme for students of all ages and backgrounds. • conversational English groups for students from a non-English speaking background
The Centre also provides two very helpful study guides, “Guidelines for Writing and Editing” and “Writing University Assignments” and these are available on the SLC website. http://slc.otago.ac.nz/
Library Support The Library website http://www.otago.ac.nz/library provides access to resources and services, including group room bookings, library hours and locations, past exam papers, subject guides, article databases and more. If you need assistance either check out the self-help guides http://otago.libguides.com/selfhelp, or ask Library staff at the ground floor service desks, or email [email protected]
7
Māori Student Support Tēnā koutou katoa, Ko Hikaroroa te māunga, ko Waikouaiti te awa, ko Takitimu te waka, ko Ngāi Tahu tōku iwi, nō Ōtepoti ahau. Ko Rachel Sizemore tōku ignoa. Kia ora, my name is Rachel Sizemore and I am the Kaiāwhina Māori in the Otago School of Business. My role is to help link Māori students with the various support networks throughout the university and the community. Kaua e whakamā, don't be shy - come in for a chat. Mauri ora mai. Tel: +64 3 479 5342 Email: [email protected] or [email protected]
Pacific Islands’ Student Academic Advisor (Part-time)
Warm Pacific Greetings, Talofa lava, my name is Esmay Eteuati, my role is to help connect and liaise with all the Academic Departments in the Business School and other student support services. I provide pastoral care, information regarding scholarships and can refer you on get some course advice with our Academic Manager or by the Departments. As a point of contact Pacific students can see one of our Pacific Network Support People (academic staff member) in each department who will be available to assist and support students with their course of study. I also have a wide network of Pacific and non-Pacific contacts across the University should students wish to know more about other services. Tel +64 3 479 4756 Email: [email protected]
Disability Information and Support Students are encouraged to seek support if they are having difficulty with their studies due to disability, temporary or permanent impairment, injury or chronic illness. It is important to seek help early, through one of the contacts below: Website: http://www.otago.ac.nz/disabilities 65 Albany St, West Lane, ISB, Student Services Tel: +64 3 479 8235 Email: [email protected]
APPROACH TO TEACHING AND LEARNING Your focus in INFO/SENG490 is on a research project. This is a supervised project-based practicum whose final and key deliverable is a dissertation. There is no final examination.
To introduce you to the skills and knowledge required to successfully complete your project, the course begins with classroom-based sessions on scientific research and its methods. This introduction is designed to re-orientate students from being, typically, passive consumers and reproducers of established knowledge, to becoming active evaluators and creators of original scientific knowledge.
8
The components of INFO/SENG490 are described in the following sections.
Research Methods Classes The course begins with a series of 10 two-hour classes on research methods. The series includes the following topics (subject to availability of teaching staff):
• Feb 28 - Introduction • Mar 6 - Correlation and Causation • Mar 13 – Related Work Analysis • Mar 20 – Tools for Research (and development) • Mar 27 - Research Methodologies - Overview • April 3 –Statistical Research Methods - Overview • April 10 - Inferential Statistics – Significance Testing • April 17 – Alternative (e.g. Bayesian) Statistics • April 24 – Ethics in the computing and information sciences • May 1 – Thesis Writing
Please refer to Error! Reference source not found. below.
Supervised Research Project What distinguishes INFO|SENG490|COSC480 from most undergraduate papers is that you execute a piece of scientific research under the direct supervision of an experienced researcher. This is why the paper is a required component of an Honours degree. Research also characterises advanced university study such as Masters and Doctoral degrees by thesis. In industry, research methods and skills frequently support effective decision making.
In the case of INFO|SENG490|COSC480, a high degree of originality in the research topic is not necessarily required, and the project is inherently of limited scope. However, a high standard of research design, data analysis and English communication is definitely expected. You can expect to achieve this through diligent effort throughout the year in close collaboration with your supervisor. The following section describes some (but not necessarily all) of the mutual responsibilities in the student/supervisor relationship:
STUDENT RESPONSIBILITIES
You are responsible for selecting your research topic and finding an appropriate supervisor. Treat this as your most urgent task at the beginning of semester! Your selection is subject to the approval of the Course Coordinator.
While the successful conduct of your research project principally falls on your shoulders, it is vital for you to communicate with your supervisor frequently. You should schedule weekly meetings, unless there are extremely good reasons to do otherwise.
You are also expected to meet with the Coordinator at least bi-monthly to review your progress.
SUPERVISOR RESPONSIBILITIES
The role of your supervisor is two-fold:
• To provide guidance on the planning and conduct of the project, and
9
• To be one of the assessors of your dissertation.
In particular, it is your supervisor’s responsibility to:
• Meet with you regularly, i.e. weekly. • Help you refine the topic and its scope. • Ensure that you adequately define the methodology. • Provide advice on research methods and content during regular meetings. • Provide feedback on draft documents. • Report on progress to the INFO|SENG490|COSC480 Course Teaching Staff where appropriate. • Encourage a ‘research attitude’ in you, but not to do your research or write your dissertation!
COURSE TEACHING STAFF RESPONSIBILITIES
The role of the Course Teaching Staff is to:
• Provide overall management of the course. • Prepare and present classroom sessions. • Be a point of consultation in case of student or supervisor difficulties. • Maintain an overview of the progress of students and their research projects.
COLLABORATION
Although you will have a personal focus on your research topic, you will find it beneficial to participate in the critical evaluation of each other's research work. Proof-reading another student’s work can be extremely helpful to both parties, especially if English is their second language.
Dissertation The dissertation is the ultimate product of your INFO|SENG490|COSC480 research. It communicates the nature and outcomes of your research project. On successful completion of the course, you may decide to have it presented as a bound volume.
The dissertation sets out the research background, the methodology, the experiments, the results obtained, their analysis, and the conclusions reached. It should be a thoroughly referenced document that is carefully structured, comprehensive, and well-written.
The total length of the dissertation should be between 10,000 and 15,000 words. However the focus is quality not quantity! For more detailed guidance refer to Appendix V Dissertation Checklist.
DISSERTATION STRUCTURE
The dissertation will include front matter, as appropriate, and in the order indicated:
• A title page • An abstract • Acknowledgements • A table of contents • A list of tables • A list of figures
The body of the dissertation will include, as appropriate:
• An introduction • A critical review of related literature • A statement of the research problem • A description of the method used • The purpose of the study • The data obtained (perhaps as an appendix) • The research question and hypothesis • An analysis of the data • The scope of the study • A discussion of results and their validity • Definitions of terms • Conclusions and recommendations
10
The document should conclude with a list of references and any appendices.
Presentations INFO490 is a research paper, and as such there is a particular focus on your communication of proposed research, and later, of its results. The ability to communicate effectively, both in written and verbal form, is an essential skill in any professional career – whether in industry, or academia. For this reason, there are two presentations scheduled during the year.
Feedback on each student’s presentation will be provided afterwards.
All Information and Computer Science teaching and research staff are invited to attend INFO|SENG490|COSC480 presentations.
Computer Science/Information Science Seminar Series These seminars provide you with an opportunity to experience research-related presentations. You will see how more experienced researchers tackle research-related issues and communicate results to their peers.
Since you are now part of the University of Otago’s research community, you are strongly encouraged to attend every seminar in the joint Computer Science/Information Science research seminar series.
Typically the seminar topic will appear unrelated to your particular topic. BUT unexpected insights are often obtained while attending a seminar of no apparent relevance! At the very least, doubtfully relevant seminars are an opportunity to broaden your interests and knowledge. Follow the example set by the Course Staff and just go anyway!
These seminars are usually held 1pm. on Fridays during semester time, although this time may vary according to speaker availability. You should receive email advice from the Department about each seminar.
EXPECTATIONS AND WORKLOAD All document deliverables are expected to be of a high professional standard, with a commensurate standard of English spelling and grammar. Work falling significantly short of this requirement will be returned for correction and resubmission.
Successfully completing your research project and writing the dissertation will be challenging! Do not underestimate the time and effort required.
Also, do not underestimate the enormous satisfaction students typically feel when, having successfully completed their investigation, analysed their data and written their report, they can choose to hold their bound dissertation, proudly admiring their name and project title in gold lettering on the spine of the book!
11
COURSE RESOURCES
Textbooks
RECOMMENDED
Leedy, P.D. and Ormrod, J.E., 2013. Practical Research: Planning and Design, 10th Edition. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. Available for purchase at the UBS. One copy is held at the Science Library (reserve). The 9th edition of Leedy and Ormrod is mostly usable if you can find a second hand one. Refer to the library’s 10th edition for page numbers and content variations. This addition is held at: The Bill Robertson Library (lending), the Central Library (reference) and the Science Library (lending).
RESEARCH ETHICS AND TRUTHFULNESS Absolute honesty and integrity is an essential requirement of scientific research!
Students should ensure that all submitted work is their own. Any student found responsible for dishonest practice (e.g. copying the work of others, use of unauthorized material in your documents) in relation to any piece of work submitted for assessment shall be subjected to the University’s Dishonest Practice regulations. This may result in various penalties, including forfeiture of marks for the piece of work submitted, a zero grade for the paper, or in extreme cases, exclusion from the University (http://www.otago.ac.nz/study/plagiarism/).
Plagiarism is a form of dishonest practice. Plagiarism is defined as the copying or paraphrasing another’s work, whether intentionally or through failure to take proper care, and presenting it as one’s own. In practice, this means plagiarism includes any attempt in any piece of submitted work to present as one’s own work, the work of another (whether another student or published authority) http://www.otago.ac.nz/administration/policies/otago003145.html . Any student found responsible for plagiarism shall be subject to the University’s Dishonest Practice Regulations as outlined above. If you have any doubts whatsoever about whether, or how, to acknowledge the work of others, please consult with your supervisor, or the Course Staff.
CONCERNS ABOUT THE COURSE We hope you will feel comfortable coming to talk to us if you have a concern about the course. The Course Staff will be happy to discuss any concerns you may have. Alternatively, you can report your concerns to the Class Representative who will follow up with departmental staff. If, after making approaches via these channels, you do not feel that your concerns have been addressed, there are University channels that may aid resolution. For further advice or more information on these, contact the Departmental Administrator or Head of Department.
DISCLAIMER While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained in this document is accurate, it is subject to change. Changes will be notified on the Blackboard, in class where possible and via your student email in urgent cases. It is your responsibility to be informed.
12
APPENDIX I TOPIC OUTLINE (STRUCTURE)
Student Name:
Topic Title:
Supervisor’s Name:
Introduction Background Principal Research Question(s) Scope of the Research Importance of the Study Issues to be Addressed
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
References ---------------------- NOTE: For a sample Topic Outline refer to the Blackboard
13
APPENDIX III RESEARCH PROPOSAL CHECKLIST1 - GUIDELINE Not all items are necessarily applicable to a given project!
Attribute Comment
Document The structure of the document is clearly set out using appropriate headings and sub-headings.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ The abstract provides a lucid summary in less than 250 words.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ Page layout is clear and attractive with sufficient margins. (Left a minimum of 30 mm for binding, all others at least 20 mm.)
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ The English used is of professional standard with no spelling errors or grammatical shortcomings.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ The tables and figures are clear, labelled and understandable.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ Problem and its Setting The problem addressed by the proposed research is clearly and concisely stated.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ The scope and limitations of the proposed research are clearly stated.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ Key terms are identified and clearly defined.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ The importance of the study is clearly explained.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ Assumptions underlying the proposed research are made explicit.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ Literature
Background knowledge to the proposed research is outlined by reference to related literature.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ Gaps in knowledge about the research problem are identified.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□
1 0 = Attribute absent, …, 5 = Attribute fully compliant.
14
Attribute Comment Important concepts are identified and are discussed in relation to the research problem and its proposed solution.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ Theoretical or Conceptual Framework (if used)
The theoretical framework is succinctly stated in relation to the stated research problem.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ Research Hypotheses The principal hypothesis is clear, testable and specific.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ Subordinate hypotheses are identified and clearly stated.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ The hypotheses logically flow from the research problem and/or the theoretical framework.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ Research Variables
The independent and dependant variables are identified.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ The independent and dependant variables are operationally defined.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ Potential confounding variables are identified.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ How the effects of potential confounding variables will be mitigated is described.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ Research Design
The proposed research method is described such that a competent independent researcher could carry it out.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ The proposed design is appropriate for the research problem.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ The internal and external validity of the proposed method is examined.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ Assumptions made in the research design are identified.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ Data Collection
The data sources (primary and/or secondary) are identified and described.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□
15
Attribute Comment The data and its proposed method of collection are described such that a competent independent researcher could collect what is required.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ The intended data collection methods are appropriate for the study.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ The proposed data collection instruments are appropriate for the study.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ Appropriate ethical approval is being sought for research involving human or animal subjects.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ Results and Data Analysis
The proposed treatment of the data is described such that a competent independent researcher could carry it out.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ The proposed treatment of the data is appropriate with regard to the research hypothesis(es).
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ The proposed treatment of data is appropriate for the scales of measurement of the variables.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ Proposed statistical tests are appropriate to the data and the hypothesis.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ Resources
The resources needed to support the research are described. Arrangements for ensuring these resources are available when and where needed are detailed.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ A budget is given for anticipated expenses and their funding.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ Arrangements for obtaining this funding are described.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ The suitability of the researcher is briefly outlined.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ Citations
16
Attribute Comment Every significant assertion is supported by an appropriate citation. (Or by logical argument from valid premises, or by data obtained during the research.)
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ Citations are appropriately and consistently formatted.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ The list of references is appropriately and consistently formatted.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ All citations are in the list of references and all references are cited at least once.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ The types of reference are well balanced, considering the nature of the topic.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□
17
APPENDIX IV LITERATURE REVIEW CHECKLIST2 Not all items are necessarily applicable to a given project.
Attribute Comment
Starts with brief introduction stating what concepts the review will be focusing on, and why.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□
Groups logically related material under appropriate headings and subheadings.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□
Examines how others define/describe the key concepts of the research topic.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□
Cites definitive/seminal works for key concepts.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□
Gaps in knowledge related to the current research problem are identified.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□
Relates prior research to the expected outcomes (hypotheses) of the current project.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□
Examines how others have obtained data in similar projects.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□
Examines how others have analysed their data in similar projects.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□
Critically analyses the quality of research and validity of conclusions reached in related prior research.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□
Seeks to define the current state of related research.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□
Mostly cites from refereed sources.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□
2 Attribute evaluation: 0 = Non-compliant; 5 = Fully compliant.
18
Identifies key contributors to the field.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□
Ends with summary of important findings in relation to research project.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□
In-text citations in appropriate format, used consistently.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□
20 – 40 references. 0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□
Draws on an appropriate variety of sources
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□
The types of reference are well balanced, considering the nature of the topic.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□
Citations are appropriately and consistently formatted.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□
The list of references is appropriately and consistently formatted.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□
All citations are in the bibliography and all references are cited at least once.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□
19
APPENDIX V DISSERTATION CHECKLIST3,4 Not all items are necessarily applicable to a given project. Attribute Comment Presentation
The report is clearly structured using appropriately headed sections.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ Page layout is clear and attractive with adequate margins. (Left: a minimum of 30 mm for binding; all others at least 20 mm.)
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ The English used is of professional standard with no spelling errors or grammatical shortcomings.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ The front material is complete and accurate
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□
The Problem The research problem is clearly and concisely stated.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ The scope of the research is clearly stated.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ The importance of the study is clearly explained.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ Key terms are identified and clearly defined.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□
Hypotheses
The hypotheses are clear, testable and specific.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ Each hypothesis describes a predicted relationship between two or more variables (explicitly or implicitly).
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ The hypotheses logically flow from the research problem and/or the theoretical framework.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□
Literature Review 0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□
The literature review is logically organised.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□
3Adapted from “Critiquing a Research Report”, p. 287, Leedy and Ormrod, 2001. (INFO490 textbook). 4 Attribute evaluation: 0 = Non-compliant, …, 5 = Fully compliant.
20
Attribute Comment The review provides a critique of studies in relation to the research problem and its solution.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ Important concepts are identified and are discussed in relation to the research problem and its solution.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ Gaps in knowledge about the research problem are identified.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□
Key authors in the field are included. 0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□
Theoretical or Conceptual Framework (if used)
The theoretical framework is clearly related to the stated research problem.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ Concepts are adequately defined and the relationships between them clearly identified.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□
Research Variables
The independent and dependant variables are identified.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ The independent and dependant variables are operationally defined.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ The potential for confounding variables is discussed, and if present, are clearly described.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□
Research Design
The proposed research method is described such that a competent independent researcher could carry it out.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ The design addresses issues of the internal and external validity of the study.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ Assumptions made in the research are stated and their implications examined.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□
Data Collection
The data and its proposed method of collection are described such that a competent independent researcher could collect what is required.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ Limitations of the sampling method are clearly described.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ The data collection methods are appropriate for the study.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□
21
Attribute Comment The data collection instruments are clearly described.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ The data measurement tools used have reasonable validity and reliability.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□
Results and Data Analysis
The results section is clearly and logically organised.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ The treatment of the data is described such that a competent independent researcher could carry it out.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ The type of analysis is appropriate for the scales of measurement of the variables
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ The tables and figures are clear, labelled and understandable.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ Each statistical test is appropriate to the data and the hypothesis being tested.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□
Discussion and Conclusions
The author clearly distinguishes between data, conclusions drawn from the data, opinions, and speculation.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ The conclusions are based on the data obtained.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ How the conclusions are reached from the data and its analysis is clearly and logically described.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ Conclusions are discussed in relation to the research hypotheses and/or the theoretical framework.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ Generalisations made are in accordance with the study scope and sampling methods.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ The limitations of the results are clearly described.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ The implications of the results are made clear.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□
Citations
Every significant assertion is supported by an appropriate citation. (Or by logical argument from valid premises, or by data obtained during the research.)
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ Citations are appropriately and consistently formatted.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□
22
Attribute Comment The bibliography is appropriately and consistently formatted.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ All citations are in the bibliography and all references are cited at least once.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□ The types of reference are well balanced, considering the nature of the topic.
0 1 2 3 4 5 □□□□□□
23
APPENDIX VI PRESENTATION GUIDELINES
Presentation evaluation and grading by Course Staff focuses on the following:
• Presentation structure/length/clarity. • Ability to convey concepts (with consideration of the topic’s complexity). • Enthusiasm exhibited; ability to engage audience. • Technical detail of content, focus of presentation. • Clarity and quality of hand-in material (where appropriate).
Feedback from Academic Staff focuses on identifying potential issues with the student’s research and possible solutions. It should be non-critical and is not part of presentation grading.
Presentation 1
LITERATURE REVIEW
Your literature review should provide substantial material for the second presentation. The same general principles apply – be prepared, and use the OHP5 where appropriate. Eight minutes plus discussion time should enable you to pass on to your audience some details of the major works that have an impact on your topic. Suggested OHP slides: one to revisit the topic and the objectives, three to describe the most prominent works to date (also describing why they were so prominent), and one or two addressing how the research methods used in the literature inform yours, and whether the results are what you had expected. You must ensure that the material presented in this presentation is directly and critically related to your research topic. Presentation 2
RESEARCH REPORT
At this point you should have completed your research project and be nearing completion of your dissertation. This presentation therefore provides you with an opportunity to present the most significant results and the preliminary conclusions of your work (in up to eight minutes). Suggested OHP slides: One to revisit the topic and your objectives; two to describe the work you did; two to describe the results; and one or two to comment on your conclusions and how you drew them.
5 OHP stands for Overhead Projector and I left it because it’s a cute term. In today’s context it means a slide show (PPT, PDF, or Keynote) done with a projector.
APPENDIX VII DISSERTATION TITLE PAGE AND DECLARATION TEMPLATES
Improving the Morale of Software Development Personnel Through the Use of Torture
Mary Elizabeth Anne Culpa
A dissertation submitted for the partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of {Science|Commerce} (Honours) at the University of
Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
November 2014
DECLARATION CONCERNING DISSERTATION IN ELECTRONIC
FORM
Author's full name:
Author’s year of birth:
Title of dissertation:
Degree:
Department: {Information|Computer} Science
At the discretion of the Head of Department, all or part of this dissertation may be made available on the departmental website. I understand that website and the document will be searchable on the World Wide Web.
Signature: ........................................................................................................
Date: ..................................
![DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION [4910-9X] · This final rule reflects the existing role of the Department’s Regulatory Reform Task Force in the development of the Department’s regulatory](https://img.pdfslide.net/doc/110x75/5eccc24da35ac0098959299d/department-of-transportation-4910-9x-this-final-rule-reflects-the-existing-role.jpg)
