DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY UNITED STATES ARMY · PDF fileFuture Years Plan v-vi Section I - Budget Appendix Extract Language ... Shop/Area Maintenance Support Activity 4,275 4,275 C II-33

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMYUNITED STATES ARMY RESERVE

FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2001 BUDGET SUBMISSION

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

SUBMITTED TO CONGRESS

FEBRUARY 2000

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page

Table of Contents i

State List and Summary Data ii

Air and Water Pollution Abatement iii

Energy Conservation Investment Program iv

Future Years Plan v-vi

Section I - Budget Appendix Extract

Language

Special Considerations

Section II - Installation and Project Justification DataDD Forms 1390/1391

Major Construction

Unspecified Minor Construction

Planning and Design

I-l

I-2

II-1

II-41

II-42

MR. ERIC LOUGHNER, -EN

i

Department of the Army Military Construction, Army Reserve - FY 2001 Index of Locations (Dollars in Thousands)

DD FormNew/ 1391

State/ Installation and Location Auth Approp Current PageCountry Project Title Amount Amount Mission No.

Inside the United StatesFlorida Orlando

Addition/Alteration to AFR Center/ 17,953 17,953 N II-3 Organizational Maintenance Shop

Subtotal 17,953 17,953

Louisiana Fort Polk Addition/Alteration to USAR Center/ Organizational Maintenance Shop/Equipment 9,912 9,912 C II-8 Concentration Site

New Orleans USAR Center/Organizational Maintenance Shop/Unheated Storage 10,375 10,375 C II-13

Subtotal 20,287 20,287

New Hampshire Rochester Land Acquisition 980 980 C II-18

Subtotal 980 980

Texas Camp Bullis USAR Center/Unheated Storage 1,464 1,464 C II-22

Fort Sam Houston USAR Center/Organizational Maintenance Shop/Equipment Concentration Site 13,678 13,678 C II-27

Subtotal 15,142 15,142

Virginia Fort A P Hill USAR Center/Organizational Maintenance Shop/Area Maintenance Support Activity 4,275 4,275 C II-33

Subtotal 4,275 4,275

Washington Tacoma USAR Center/Organizational Maintenance Shop/Area Maintenance Support Activity (Marine) 14,759 14,759 C II-38

Subtotal 14,759 14,759

Subtotal Major Construction 73,396 73,396

Support Unspecified Minor Construction 1,917 1,917 NA II-41Planning and Design 6,400 6,400 NA II-42

Grand Total Authorization/TOA 81,713 81,713

Total New Mission 17,953Total Current Mission 55,443

ii

Department of the Army Military Construction, Army Reserve - FY 2001 Index of Locations Air and Water Pollution Abatement (Dollars in Thousands)

State/ Installation and Location Auth AppropCountry Project Title Amount Amount

None

iii

Department of the Army Military Construction, Army Reserve - FY 2001 Index of Locations Energy Conservation and Pollution Abatement (Dollars in Thousands)

State/ Installation and Location Auth AppropCountry Project Title Amount Amount

None

iv

Military Construction, Army Reserve Outyear Project Data

Change FromFiscal Facility Program Budgeted Previous

Component Year Appropriation Installation Location Project Title Category Element Amount Submission

USAR 2001 2086 Orlando FL Add/Alt AFRC/OMS/Storage 171 0532292A 17953 -833USAR 2001 2086 Ft Gillem GA USARC/OMS/Direct Support/Whse Phase II 171 0532292A 0 -18511USAR 2001 2086 Barrigada GU USARC/OMS/AMSA Phase II 171 0532292A 0 -16430USAR 2001 2086 Ft Knox KY USARC/OMS 171 0532292A 0 -11195USAR 2001 2086 Ft Polk LA Add/Alt USARC/OMS/ECS 171 0532292A 9912 5603USAR 2001 2086 New Orleans LA USARC/OMS/AMSA/Unhtd Strg 171 0532292A 10375 -2106USAR 2001 2086 Rochester NH Land Acquisition 171 0532292A 980 980USAR 2001 2086 Ft Dix NJ Centralized Tactical Veh Wash Fac Phase II 149 0532292A 0 -4017USAR 2001 2086 Ft Wadsworth NY Add/Alt USARC/OMS/AMSA Phase II 171 0532292A 0 -3720USAR 2001 2086 Ft Buchanan PR USARC Phase II 171 0532292A 0 -8670USAR 2001 2086 Camp Bullis TX USARC/Unhtd Strg 171 0532292A 1464 1464USAR 2001 2086 Ft Hood TX AMSA/ECS Phase II 171 0532292A 0 -6747USAR 2001 2086 Ft Sam Houston TX USARC/OMS/ECS 171 0532292A 13678 -1524USAR 2001 2086 Ft A P Hill VA USARC/OMS/AMSA 171 0532292A 4275 4275USAR 2001 2086 Tacoma WA USARC/OMS/AMSA (Marine) 171 0532292A 14759 250USAR 2001 2086 Various ZU Unspecified 171 0532292A 1917 0USAR 2001 2086 Various ZU Planning and Design 171 0532292A 6400 0

Total 81713 -61181

USAR 2002 2086 Tafuna AS Add/Alt USARC/OMS 171 0532292A 17058 2602USAR 2002 2086 Ft Carson CO Add AFRC/AMSA 171 0532292A 10453 699USAR 2002 2086 West Hartford CT Add/Alt USARC 171 0532292A 0 -16375USAR 2002 2086 Ft Knox KY USARC/OMS 171 0532292A 9545 9545USAR 2002 * 2086 Rochester NH USARC/OMS 171 0532292A 0 -7043USAR 2002 2086 Ft Lewis WA USARC/OMS/ASF 171 0532292A 15173 701USAR 2002 2086 Various ZU Unspecified 171 0532292A 2375 -125USAR 2002 2086 Various ZU Planning and Design 171 0532292A 6300 0

Total 60904 -9996

USAR 2003 2086 Mesa AZ USARC 171 0532292A 8104 8104USAR 2003 2086 Honolulu HI USARC/AMSA (Marine) 171 0532292A 3062 3062USAR 2003 2086 Ft Meade MD USARC/OMS/Warehouse 171 0532292A 17190 -559USAR 2003 * 2086 Rochester NH USARC/OMS 171 0532292A 6691 -352USAR 2003 2086 Cleveland OH Land Acquisition 171 0532292A 1236 -100USAR 2003 2086 Aquadilla PR USARC/OMS/Warehouse 171 0532292A 8386 -1241USAR 2003 2086 Ft A P Hill VA USARC/OMS/AMSA 171 0532292A 0 -4170USAR 2003 2086 Ft Story VA USARC/OMS 171 0532292A 0 -11024USAR 2003 2086 Various ZU Unspecified 171 0532292A 2850 -150USAR 2003 2086 Various ZU Planning and Design 171 0532292A 6300 0

* Rochester, NH inadvertently included in two FYs on February 1999 FYP. FY 2003 is correct FY. Total 53819 -17596

Military Construction, Army Reserve Outyear Project Data

Change FromFiscal Facillity Program Budgeted Previous

Component Year Appropriation Installation Location Project Title Category Element Amount Submission

USAR 2004 2086 Mesa AZ USARC 171 0532292A 0 0USAR 2004 2086 March AFB CA USARC/OMS 171 0532292A 0 -8821USAR 2004 2086 Parks RFTA CA USARC/OMS/AMSA 171 0532292A 0 -19940USAR 2004 2086 Clearwater FL AFRC/ASF 171 0532292A 26820 26820USAR 2004 2086 Honolulu HI USARC/AMSA (Marine) 171 0532292A 0 -4418USAR 2004 2086 Curtis Bay MD Alt USARC/AMSA (Marine) 171 0532292A 0 -3850USAR 2004 2086 St Charles MO USARC/OMS 171 0532292A 0 -19500USAR 2004 2086 Cleveland OH USARC 171 0532292A 14083 14083USAR 2004 2086 Johnstown PA AMSA Consolidation 171 0532292A 0 -6100USAR 2004 2086 Texarkana TX OMS 214 0532292A 1140 1140USAR 2004 2086 Ft Story VA USARC/OMS 171 0532292A 10473 10473USAR 2004 2086 Ft McCoy WI Provost Marshall Office 171 0532292A 0 -1526USAR 2004 2086 Various ZU Unspecified 171 0532292A 2886 -152USAR 2004 2086 Various ZU Planning and Design 171 0532292A 6458 0

Total 61860 -11791

USAR 2005 2086 Ft Huachuca AZ AFRC/OMS 171 0532292A 0 -4780USAR 2005 2086 Los Alamitos CA RSC HQ 171 0532292A 4011 4011USAR 2005 2086 Mare Island CA USARC 171 0532292A 5062 5062USAR 2005 2086 Middletown CT Add/Alt USARC/OMS 171 0532292A 0 -12260USAR 2005 2086 Gulfport MS Storage Complex 441 0532292A 27767 27767USAR 2005 2086 Lincoln NE USARC 171 0532292A 8047 8047USAR 2005 2086 Omaha NE USARC/OMS 171 0532292A 0 -10820USAR 2005 2086 Ft Dix NJ ARISC 171 0532292A 0 -4975USAR 2005 2086 Ft Dix NJ MOS Trng Fac 171 0532292A 7125 2150USAR 2005 2086 Ft Totten NY USARC 171 0532292A 4441 -234USAR 2005 2086 Cleveland OH USARC/OMS 171 0532292A 0 -14120USAR 2005 2086 Ft Lewis WA USARC/OMS 171 0532292A 0 -14146USAR 2005 2086 Various ZU Unspecified 171 0532292A 2923 -154USAR 2005 2086 Various ZU Planning and Design 171 0532292A 6621 0

Total 65997 -14452

SECTION I

APPROPRIATION LANGUAGE MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, ARMY RESERVE For construction, acquisition, expansion, rehabilitation, and conversion of facilities for the training and administration of the Army Reserve as authorized by Chapter 1803 of Title 10, United States Code and military construction Authorization Acts, ($23,120,000) $81,713,000 to remain available until September 30, (2004) 2005.

I-1

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, ARMY RESERVE FY 2001

SPECIAL PROGRAM CONSIDERATIONS Pollution Abatement The military construction projects proposed in this program will be designed to meet environmental standards. Military construction projects proposed primarily for abatement of existing pollution problems at installations have been reviewed to ensure that corrective design is accomplished in accordance with specific standards and criteria. Energy Conservation Military construction projects specifically for energy conservation at installations have been developed, reviewed, and selected with prioritization by energy savings per investment cost. Projects include improvements to existing facilities and utilities systems to upgrade design, eliminate waste, and install energy saving devices. Projects are designed for minimum energy consumption. Flood Plain Management and Wetlands Protection Proposed land acquisitions, disposals, and installation construction projects have been planned to allow the proper management of flood plains and the protection of wetlands by avoiding long and short term adverse degradation of wetlands. Project planning is in accordance with the requirements of Executive Order Nos. 11988 and 11990. Design for Accessibility of Physically Handicapped Personnel In accordance with Public Law 90-480, provisions for physically handicapped personnel will be provided for, where appropriate, in the design of facilities included in this program. Environmental Protection In accordance with Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (PL 91-190), the environmental impact analysis process has been completed or is actively underway for all projects in the Military Construction Program. Economic Analysis Economics are an inherent aspect of project development and design of military construction projects. Therefore, all projects included in this program represent the most economical use of resources.

I-2

SPECIAL PROGRAM CONSIDERATIONS (continued) Reserve Potential The Reserve potential to meet and maintain authorized strengths of all Reserve flying/nonflying units in those areas in which these facilities are to be located has been reviewed. It has been determined, in coordination with all other Services having Reserve flying/nonflying units in these areas, that the number of units of the Reserve components of the Armed Forces presently located in those areas, and those which have been allocated to the areas for future activation, is not and will not be larger than the number that reasonably can be expected to be maintained at authorized strength considering the number of persons living in the areas who are qualified for membership in those Reserve units. Preservation of Historical Sites and Structures Facilities included in this program do not directly or indirectly affect a district, site, building, structure, object, or setting listed in the National Register of Historic Places, except as noted on DD Form 1391. Use of Excess Schools and Other Buildings Considerations were made to utilize available commercial or academic buildings but none were suitable except as identified by specific projects in this request. Placement of Reserve Component Units in Local Communities The Reserve manpower potential to meet and maintain authorized strengths of all Reserve units in the areas where units are to be located has been reviewed in accordance with the procedures described in DoD Directive 1225.7. It has been determined, in coordination with the other Military Departments having Reserve units in the area, that the number of Reserve components presently located in the area, and those units having been allocated to this area for future activation, is not and shall not be larger than the number that reasonably may be maintained at authorized strength. Facility Planning and Design Guide Unless otherwise noted, the projects comply with the scope and design criteria prescribed in Part II of Military Handbook 1190, "Facility Planning and Design Guide." Congressionally Directed Projects No projects were directed by any congressional committee for inclusion in the FY 2001 budget.

I-3

SPECIAL PROGRAM CONSIDERATIONS

(continued)

Congressional Reporting Requirements The following paragraph, titled "Maintenance and Repair of Real Property," is in response to the Senate Appropriations Committee requirement contained on page 24 (Non-MILCON Construction Activities) of the Report #100-200 and page 1006 (Non-MILCON Construction activities), Senate and House Conference Report #100-498. Appropriation ($000) Operation and Maintenance, Army Reserve - Maintenance and Repair 106.3 - Minor Construction 8.4

I-4

SECTION II

I 1. COMPONENTFY 2001 GUARD AND RESERVE

USAR MILITARY CONSTRUCTION Feb 003. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. AREA CONSTR

COST INDEX

USAR Center. Orlando, FL 0.845. FREQUENCY AND TYPE UTILIZATION

Reservists - 3 weekends/month 3 nights/weekFull-Time Personnel - 5 days/week

6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUSUSAR, Center, ECS 50, NTC Annex - 5 kilometersUSAR, Center, ASF 49, Orlando - 8 kilometersUSAR, Center, McCoy USARC - 6 kilometersUSAR, Center, Orange City - 35 kilometersUSN, Center, NTC Orlando - 37 kilometers

7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM

CATEGORY COST DESIGN STATUS

CODE PROJECT TITLE SCOPE ($000) START COMPLETE

17140 Add/Alt AFR CTR/OMS 14,113 m2 17,953 01/99 09/00

8. STATE RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATIONFacilities identified in Item 6 have been examined by the 28 Jan 1999Joint Service Reserve Component Facility Board for possible (Date)

joint use/expansion. The board recommends joint construction.9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED 9.20FEE PURCHASE (Number of Acres)

10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS

None

FISCAL COSTYEAR ($000)

DD Form 1390S/1, MAY 78 120/215 Page Page 1 of 2

II-1

1. COMPONENT

USARFY 2001 GUARD AND RESERVE


2 . DATE

Feb 003. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION

USAR Center, Orlando, FL

4. AREA CONSTRCOST INDEX0.84

11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF: 30 Nov 1999

PERMANENT GUARD/RESERVE

TOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED CIVILIAN TOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED

AUTHORIZE 89 31 23 35 1956 145 1811

ACTUAL 60 17 20 23 1988 134 1854

12. RESERVE UNIT DATAASGD/AUTH 102%

STRENGTH

UNIT DESIGNATION

143 TRANS CMD143 TRANS CMD, HHC143 TRANS CMD WATERCRAFT154 JA TM 21174 LSO, LEG SVC TM 3174 LSO, MIL JUDGE TM 4841 ENGR BN (CMBT), CO B196TH TC COUNITS NOT SHOWNTotals

Total Units Not Shown = 18

AUTHORIZED ACTUAL

13 13219 232

7 75 0

12 222 2

118 141142 97

1438 1474

1956 1988

13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT

TYPE AUTHORIZED ACTUAL

Wheeled Vehicles 128 130Trailers 49 37Tracked Vehicles 4 5

Totals 181 172

14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES

I( $ 0 0 0 )

Air PollutionWater PollutionSafety and Occupational Health

DD Form 1390S/2, MAY 78 REPLACES DD Form 1390S, DEC 76, WHICH IS OBSOLETE Page 2 of 2

II-2

1. COMPONENT 2. DATEFY 2001 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA

USAR Feb 003. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONUSAR CenterOrlando, FL

4. PROJECT TITLE

Add/Alt AFR CTR/OMS5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST ($000)

0532292A 17140 CAR 01-10888 17,953

9. COST ESTIMATES

COSTITEM U/M QUANTITY UNIT COST ($000)

PRIMARY FACILITIES: 14095Training Bldg Alt (22,242 sf) m2 2,066 1047.43 ( 2164)Training Bldg Add (121,116 sf) m2 11,252 973.25 ( 10951)Maintenance Bldg (8,560 sf) m2 795 1056.60 ( 840)Antiterrorism/Force Protection LS - - ( 140)

SUPPORTING FACILITIES: 2890Site Improvement LS - - ( 2250)Telecommunications LS - - ( 622)Antiterrorism/Force Protection LS - - ( 18)

TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST 16985Contingencies ( .0 %) 0Supervision and Administration (5.7 %) 968

TOTAL PROJECT COST 17953

10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION

Construct a 2000-member Armed Forces Reserve Center (AFRC), anaddition/alteration to an existing Reserve Center, and construct a newOrganizational Maintenance Shop (OMS) Buildings will be permanentconstruction with reinforced concrete foundation and floor slab, loadbearing masonry exterior walls, architectural standing seam metal roof onsteel joists, and HVAC systems. Project will include sufficientelectrical, mechanical and security systems (fire alarm connected via radioand security system telephone lines for intrusion alarms). Supportingfacilities include land clearing, paving, fencing, general siteimprovements, and extension of utilities to serve project. Forceprotection (physical security) measures will be incorporated into designincluding maximum feasible standoff distance from roads, parking areas, andvehicle unloading areas, berms, heavy landscaping, and bollards to preventaccess when standoff distance cannot be maintained. Air Conditioning:1400 kw

11. REQUIREMENT: 14,113 m2 Adequate: 0m2 Substandard: 2,292m2PROJECT: Construct a Joint AFRC, an addition/alteration to an existingReserve Center, and construct a new OMS. (New Mission)

REQUIREMENT: This project will provide a 2000-member AFRC withadministrative areas, individual and unit training, classrooms, library,learning center, assembly hall, arms vault, kitchen and communications

Page 1 of 3II-3

1. COMPONENT 2. DATE

FY 2001 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATAUSAR Feb 00

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONUSAR CenterOrlando, FL

4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT NUMBER

Add/Alt AFR CTR/OMS CAR 01-10888

11. REQUIREMENT (CONT)

security training and storage facilities for 26 Navy Reserve, 20 Army.Reserve, and three Marine Corps units. The OMS will provide space fortraining of mechanics and to perform organizational maintenance on unitequipment. The OMS space includes workbays, parts and tools storage,maintenance offices, supply and battery rooms, flammable storage,controlled waste storage, and toilets. The project will provide privatelyowned vehicle and military equipment parking, as well as generic andspecialized training areas for the RC units assigned. This AFRC willfacilitate several RC units critical to mobilization of the Nation's armedforces, to include Transportation Command, air and sea terminal movementcontrol units, hospital units, and a Combat Engineer unit. Intrusiondetection systems (IDS) support requirements are for weapons vault andfire/security alarm.

CURRENT SITUATION: Many of these RC units are currently sufferingovercrowded and substandard conditions in several aged and/or leasedinadequate facilities in the greater Orlando metropolitan area. Commandand control relationships are encumbered and have a negative effect on unittraining and readiness. In some cases, the units are involuntarily losingleased space to city expansion requirements, while others are simplyexpensive leases in very inadequate structures. It is not economicallyfeasible to correct certain training deficiencies or to install newer moreefficient training devices or systems in current physical plant.

IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: These RC units will be forced to endure inadequatefacilities with the attendant penalties to the training effort andreadiness of these critical Contingency Force Pool (CFP) units. Resourceswill continue to be drained from readiness to provide leased training andstorage. space. Of great concern is the emergency housing of units thatwill be dislocated from space leased from the city in the case ofnon-renewed contracts. These individual RC units will be forced to pursueindependent and much less efficient solutions to their dilemma at somepoint in their future and this feasible, prudent and resourcefulopportunity will be lost to the RC community.

ADDITIONAL: This project was coordinated with the Regional Support Commandphysical security plan and no force protection/combating terrorism measuresother than those required by regulations and design guides for protectingFederal property are included. An economic analysis was prepared andutilized in evaluating this project. Alternative methods of meeting thisrequirement were explored during project development. This project is the

Page 2 of 3

II-4

2 DATE

FY 2001 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA Feb 00

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION

USAR CenterOrlando, FL

4. PROJECT TITLE

Add/Alt AFR CTR/OMS5. PROJECT NUMBER

CAR 01-10888

11. REQUIREMENT (CONT)most feasible option to meet the requirement. Parametric estimates werenot used to develop project cost. This project was fully coordinated andapproved by the USNR and the USMCR.

12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:a. Estimated design data:

(1) Status:(a) Date Design Started............................01/99(b) Percent Complete as of January 2000.................35%(c) Date Design 35% Complete......................09/99(d) Date Design Complete............................09/00(e) Parametric Cost Estimating Used to Develop Cost. No(f) An energy study and life cycle cost analysis will

be documented during the final design.(g) Type of Design Contract.................Design-Build

(2) Basis:(a) Standard or Definitive Design ................. No(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used ........... N/A

(3) Total Cost (c) = (a) + (b) or (d) + (e): ($000)(a) Production of Plans and Specifications ........ 421(b) All Other Design Costs ........................ 1296(c) Total ......................................... 1717(d) Contract ...................................... 1717(e) In-house ....................................... 0

(4) Contract Award.....................................10/00(5) Construction Start..................................12/00(6) Construction Completion.............................12/02

b. Equipment associated with this project which will be providedfrom other appropriations:

Fiscal YearEquipment Procuring Appropriated CostNomenclature Appropriation Or Requested ($000)Furniture OMAR 2002 3513Kitchen Equipment OMAR 2001 110Wire Partitions OMAR 2001 267Metal Shelving OMAR 2001 192

TOTAL: 4082

Point of Contact: LTC Lincoln, 703-601-3419

1. COMPONENTFY 2001 GUARD AND RESERVE

2. DATE


COST INDEXUSAR Center, Fort Polk, LA

5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE UTILIZATION

0.89

Reservists - 2 weekends/month 2 nights/weekFull-Time Personnel - 5 days/week

6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUSARNG, Armory, Fort Polk, LA - 2 kilometersARNG, Armory, De Ridder, LA - 27 kilometersARNG, Armory, Oakdale, LA - 60 kilometers


CATEGORYCODE PROJECT TITLE SCOPE

COST($000)

DESIGN STATUS

START COMPLETE

17140 Add/Alt USAR CTR/OMS/ECS 8,025 m2 9,912 03/98 09/00


joint use/expansion. The board recommends unilateral construction.9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED 0None (Number of Acres)


None

DD Form 1390S/1, MAY 78 120/215 Page 1 of 2

II-6


MILITARY CONSTRUCTION3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION

USAR Center, Fort Polk, LA

2. DATE

USAR Feb 004. AREA CONSTR

COST INDEX0.89




AUTHORIZE 2 1 1 0 71 6 65

ACTUAL 2 1 1 0 82 6 76


STRENGTH

UNIT DESIGNATION AUTHORIZED ACTUAL

DET 1, 4013TH USAR GSA 65 76416TH FE TM, FORT POLK 6 6

Totals 71 82


TYPE

Wheeled VehiclesTotals

AUTHORIZED ACTUAL

3 3

3 3



($000)

000

DD Form 1390812, MAY 78 REPLACES DD Form 1390S, DEC 76, WHICH IS OBSOLETE Page 2 of 2

II-7


USAR Feb 003. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TITLEUSAR CenterFort Polk, LA Add/Alt USAR CTR/OMS/ECS

5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST ($000)

0532292A 17140 CAR 01-05312 9,912

9. COST ESTIMATES

COSTITEM U/M QUANTITY UNIT COST

($000)PRIMARY FACILITIES: 7232

Training Building (6,906 sf) m2 642 1267.91 ( 814)Maintenance Building (16,689 sf) m2 1,550 1071.61 ( 1661)Alteration OMS (12,440 sf) m2 1,156 1070.93 ( 1238)Warehouse (50,340 sf) m2 4,677 737.22 ( 3448)Antiterrorism/Force Protection LS - - 71





Construct a new 60-member US Army Reserve Center (USARC), an EquipmentConcentration Site (ECS), and a new ECS warehouse at Fort Polk, Louisiana.The buildings will be permanent construction with reinforced concreteFoundations, concrete floor slabs, structural steel frames, masonry veneerwalls standing seam metal roof, HVAC systems, electrical systems, andsecurity systems (fire alarm connected via radio and security systemtelephone lines for intrusion alarms). Supporting facilities include landclearing, paving, fencing, general site improvements, and extension ofutilities to serve projects. Force protection (physical security) measureswill be incorporated into design including maximum feasible standoffdistance from roads, parking area, and vehicle unloading areas, berms,heavy landscaping, and bollards to prevent access when standoff distancecannot be maintained. Air Conditioning: 88 kw11. REQUIREMENT: 8,025 m2 Adequate: 0m2 Substandard: 7,309 m2PROJECT: Construct a 60-member USARC, ECS, and an ECS Warehouse. (CurrentMission).

REQUIREMENT: This project will provide facilities necessary to conduct andsupport training of USAR units stationed at Fort Polk by eliminating 19substandard WWII wood, overcrowded, inadequate facilities. The projectwill provide a new 60-member USARC facility located on Fort Polk withadministrative areas, classrooms, library, learning center and assemblyhall for reserve units. The ECS will provide space for maintenance

Page 1 of 3

II-8


FY 2001 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATAUSAR Feb 00 I

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONUSAR CenterFort Polk, LA

4. PROJECT TITLE

Add/Alt USAR CTR/OMS/ECS

5. PROJECT NUMBER

CAR 01-05312

11. REQUIREMENT (CONT) I

training to accomplish organizational maintenance of two USAR units andsupport the ECS missions. Also, the project provides for a new 4677 squaremeter warehouse to support the ECS storage mission. Intrusion detectionsystem (IDS) support requirements are for weapons vault and fire/securityalarms.

CURRENT SITUATION: The ECS occupies an existing substandard 1,087 squaremeter USAR maintenance facility that contains office space, supply andstorage, arms vault and three maintenance bays. In addition, USAR unitsoccupy 13 WWII buildings used for administrative space and storage. Due todeterioration, the facilities roofs leak and are uneconomical for repaircausing damage to stored equipment. The existing ECS shop space is toosmall to accommodate the larger items of equipment, which necessitatesoutdoor maintenance work.

IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: If this project is not approved, continued use ofinadequate facilities will adversely affect the readiness of the unitsassigned at Fort Polk and the ECS ability to receive, maintain, and issueequipment needed at Fort Polk for annual training. Equipment storagerequirements for Reserve units located throughout Louisiana and East Texasare also affected. The WWII wood facilities will continue to deterioratecausing unit morale to decline and continued structural damage will occurincreasing already excessive maintenance costs. Fort Polk Department ofPublic Works will not be able to comply with DA guidance to dispose of WWIIwood structures.

ADDITIONAL: This project has been coordinated with the installationphysical security plan and no force protection/combating terrorism measuresother than those required by regulation and design guides for protectingFederal property are included. An economic analysis has been prepared andutilized in evaluating this project. Alternative methods of meeting thisrequirement have been explored during project development. This project isthe most feasible option to meet the requirement. Parametric estimateshave not been used to develop project costs.

Page 2 of 3II-9

1. COMPONENT

FY 20011 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA2. DATE

USAR Feb 00


USAR CenterFort Polk, LA

4. PROJECT TITLE

Add/Alt USAR CTR/OMS/ECS5. PROJECT NUMBER

CAR 01-05312


(1) Status:(a) Date Design Started........................03/98(b) Percent Complete as of January 2000. . . . . . . . . . 35%(c) Date Design 35% Complete......................09/98 (d) Date Design Complete..........................09/00(e) Parametric Cost Estimating Used to Develop Cost. No(f) An energy study and life cycle cost analysis will

be documented during the final design.(g) Type of Design Contract............Design-Bid-Build

(2) Basis:(a) Standard or Definitive Design................. N o(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used........... N/A

(3) Total Cost (c) = (a) + (b) or (d) + (e) : ($000)(a) Production of Plans and Specifications........ 274(b) All Other Design Costs....................... 721(c) Total......................................... 995(d) Contract...................................... 995(e) In-house.................................. 0

(4) Contract Award.......................................10/00(5) Construction Start..................................01/01(6) Construction Completion...............................01/02


Fiscal YearEquipment Procuring Appropriated CostNomenclature Appropriation Or Requested ($000)Furniture OMAR 2002 120Wire Partitions OMAR 2001 22Warehouse Racks OMAR 2001 75

TOTAL: 217


PAGE NO II-10

1. COMPONENTFY 2001 GUARD AND RESERVE I

2. DATE

USAR MILITARY CONSTRUCTION3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION

USAR Center, New Orleans, LA5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE UTILIZATION

Feb 004. AREA CONSTR

COST INDEX

0.95

Reservists 3 weekends/month 3 nights/weekFull-Time Personnel - 5 days/week

6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUSUSAR, Center, New Orleans, LA - 3 kilometersUSMCR, Armory, New Orleans, LA - 3 kilometersUSCG, Center, New Orleans, LA - 5 kilometersUSAR, Center, New Orleans, LA - 5 kilometersUSCG, Center, New Orleans, LA - 6 kilometers




17140 USAR CTR/OMS/Unheated Storage 6,529 m2 10,375 02/98 09/00


joint use/expansion. The board recommends unilateral construction.9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED 0None

(Number of Acres)


None


II-11



2. DATE

USAR Feb 00


USAR Center, New Orleans, LA




OFFICER ENLISTED CIVILIANTOTAL TOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED

AUTHORIZE 41 6 25 10 570 88 482

ACTUAL 41 6 25 10 432 63 369


STRENGTH


90th REG LIAISON LA 2 11192 BDE TRANS TML (-) 88 641192 DET 1 BDE TRANS TML 27 252 JAG, TM 1 LEGAL SVC 8 122 JAG, TM 5 MIL JUDGE 2 42 JAG TM 7 (LEGAL SVC) 13 00751 AG CO POSTAL 1 PLT 18 100751 AG CO POSTAL(DS)2PLT 18 10UNITS NOT SHOWN 394 306

Totals 570 432



TYPE

Wheeled VehiclesTrailersTracked VehiclesTotals

AUTHORIZED ACTUAL

94 9438 381 1

133 133



( $ 0 0 0 )

000

DD Form 1390S/2, MAY 78 REPLACES DD Form 1390S, DEC 76. WHICH IS OBSOLETE Page 2 of 2

II-12



3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONUSAR CenterNew Orleans, LA

4. PROJECT TITLE

USAR CTR/OMS/Unheated Storage5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST ($000)

0532292A 17140 CAR 01-10199 10,375

9. COST ESTIMATES

ITEM

PRIMARY FACILITIES:Training Building (62,904 sf)Maintenance Building (3,768 sf)Unheated Storage (3,608 sf)Antiterrorism/Force Protection

SUPPORTING FACILITIES:Site ImprovementTelecommunicationsAntiterrorism/Force Protect

TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTContingencies ( .0 %)

ion

Supervision and Administration (5.7 %)TOTAL PROJECT COST


U/M

m2m2m 2

LS - -

LS - - LS - -LS - -

QUANTITY UNIT COST

5,844350335

1134.501300.00391.04

COST

($000)

7260( 6630)( 455)( 131)( 44)

2555( 2223)( 293)( 39)

98150

56010375

Construct a new two story, 600-member US Army Reserve Center (USARC), anJnheated Storage building, and a one story Organizational Maintenance Shop(OMS). Permanent construction includes reinforced concrete foundations,concrete floor slab, structural steel frame, masonry veneer exterior walls,standing seam roofing, mechanical systems, and electrical systems. Forceprotection (physical security) measures will be incorporated into designincluding maximum feasible standoff distance from roads, parking areas, andvehicle unloading areas, berms, heavy landscaping, and bollards to preventaccess when standoff distance cannot be maintained. Air Conditioning: 70 kw.

11. REQUIREMENT: 6,529 m2 Adequate: 0m2 Substandard: 0m2PROJECT: Construct a 600-member USARC, unheated storage building, and anOMS. (Current Mission)

REQUIREMENT This project provides facilities necessary to conduct andsupport training for 90th RSC units in the New Orleans area. This600-member training facility provides administrative areas, classrooms,library, learning center, assembly hall, arms vault, kitchen, and unitstorage capability for the functional training of units. The projectprovides an OMS facility for the functional training of maintenancepersonnel. The OMS space includes workbays, parts and tools storage,maintenance offices, supply and battery rooms, flammable storage,controlled waste storage, toilets, Military Equipment Parking, and

Page 1 of 3

II-13


FY 2001 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATAUSAR Feb 00 I

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONUSAR CenterNew Orleans, LA

4. PROJECT TITLE

USAR CTR/OMS/Unheated Storage


5. PROJECT NUMBER

CAR 01-10199

Privately Owned Vehicle parking. Intrusion detection systems (IDS) supportrequirements are for weapons vault and fire/security alarm.

CURRENT SITUATION: The 90th RSC currently houses units in twogovernment-owned, one permitted, and one leased facility. Thegovernment-owned Fleming USARC houses seven units with a currentutilization rate of 153 percent in the training facility and 301 percent inthe maintenance facility. The government-owned Diamond USARC houses tenreserve units with a current utilization rate of 140 percent in thetraining facility and 544 percent in the maintenance facility. Thepermitted Navy Support Activity USARC houses two units with a currentutilization rate for the training facility of 227 percent. The leasedMichoud Boulevard Center houses eight reserve units and costs thegovernment $178,008 per year. The lease expires in 2000. An estimate ofthe renewal cost to the government in 2000 is approximately $212,000. Thecurrent utilization rate for this facility is 139 percent for the trainingfacility and 1,173 percent for the maintenance facility. This new facilitywill alleviate overcrowding in the government-owned centers and allowcancellation of the leased facility. Land for this project was purchasedin 1994.

IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Units will be prohibited from properly conductingtraining and maintaining their readiness and mobilization objectives withthe continued use of substandard and overcrowded facilities.

ADDITIONAL: This project was coordinated with the Regional Support CommandPhysical Security Plan and no force protection/combating terrorism measuresother than those required by regulations and design guides for protectingFederal property are included. An economic analysis was prepared andutilized in evaluating this project. Alternative methods of meeting thisrequirement were explored during project development. This project is themost feasible option to meet the requirement. Parametric estimates havenot been used to develop project cost.

Page 2 of 3

II - 14

1. COMPONENT


USAR Feb 00


USAR CenterNew Orleans, LA

4. PROJECT TITLE

USAR CTR/OMS/Unheated Storage5. PROJECT NUMBER

CAR 01-10199


(1) Status:(a) Date Design Started...........................02/98(b) Percent Complete as of January 2000........... 35%(c) Date Design 35% Complete......................09/98 (d) Date Design Complete..........................09/00(e) Parametric Cost Estimating Used to Develop Cost. No(f) An energy study and life cycle cost analysis will


(2) Basis:(a) Standard or Definitive Design................. No(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used............ N/A

(3) Total Cost (c) = (a) + (b) or (d) + (e): ($000)(a) Production of Plans and Specifications........ 982(b) All Other Design Costs........................ 0(c) Total.......................................... 982(d) Contract....................................... 982(e) In-house.................................. 0

(4) Contract Award.....................................11/00(5) Construction Start.................................01/01(6) Construction Completion............................01/02

b. Equipment associated with this project which will be providedFrom other appropriations:

Fiscal YearEquipment Procuring Appropriated CostNomenclature Appropriation Or Requested ($000)Furniture OMAR 2002 388Kitchen Equipment OMAR 2001 194Wire Partitions OMAR 2001 129Metal Lockers OMAR 2001 110Dehumidifier OMAR 2001 1

TOTAL: 822

Point of Contact: LTC Lincoln,703-601-3419

PAGE NO II-15


2. DATE


USAR Center, Rochester. NH


COST INDEX1.04



6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUSUSAR, Center, Portsmouth, NH - 16 kilometersUSAR, Center, Rochester, NH - 32 kilometersUSAR, Center, Manchester, NH - 51 kilometers


CATEGORYCODE PROJECT TITLE

17140 Land Acquisition

COST DESIGN STATUS

SCOPE ($000) START COMPLETE

34,357 m2 980 N/A N/A

6. STATE RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATIONFacilities identified in Item 6 have been examined by the 02 Jun 1999Joint Service Reserve Component Facility Board for possible (Date)

joint use/expansion. The board recommends unilateral construction.9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED 8.50FEE PURCHASE (Number of Acres)

10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS FISCAL COSTYEAR ($000)

Rochester USARC/OMS 2003 6691


II-16


2. DATE


COST INDEXUSAR Center, Rochester, NH 1.04




AUTHORIZE 10 0 7 3 380 14 366

ACTUAL 5 0 3 2 291 12 279


STRENGTH


CO A 368 EN BN (CBT HVY) 144 114D/1/304R/1BDE/98DIVIT 21 19E/2BN/304RGT/1BDE/98DIVIT 21 12947 QM CO PETROLEUM 194 146Totals 380 291



Wheeled Vehicles 115 115Trailers 65 65Tracked Vehicles 8 8Totals 188 188


( $ 0 0 0 )

Air Pollution 0Water Pollution 0Safety and Occupational Health 0


II-17


USAR Feb 003. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TITLEUSAR CenterRochester, NH Land Acquisition


0532292A 17140 CAR 01-11075 980

9. COST ESTIMATES

COSTITEM U/M QUANTITY UNIT COST

($000)PRIMARY FACILITIES: 927

Land Acquisition (8.5 acres) m2 34,357 26.98 ( 927)TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST 927

Contingencies (.0%) 0Supervision and Administration (5.7%) 53


1O. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION

Acquire 34,357 square meters of land for the construction of a new US ArmyReserve Center (USARC) and Organizational Maintenance Shop (OMS) withsupporting facilities for four units that are currently occupyingovercrowded 1957 vintage centers at Rochester and Portsmouth, NewHampshire Air Conditioning: 0 kw.1 1 . REQUIREMENT: 34,357 m2 Adequate: 0m2 Substandard: 0m2PROJECT: Acquire 8.5 acres or 34,357 square meters of land to support newconstruction of an USARC and OMS. (Current Mission)

REQUIREMENT: This project supports an MCAR project programmed forconstruction in FY 2003.

CURRENT SITUATION: Units programmed for this project are currently locatedin two overcrowded 1957 vintage centers at Portsmouth and Rochester, NH.The two centers this project will eliminate are located on less than fouracres each with no expansion capability. The Rochester USARC is currentlyat 197% utilization for the training center and 552% for the OMS. ThePortsmouth USARC is currently at 271% utilization for the training centerand 817% for the OMS.

IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Failure to fund this land acquisition would delayconstruction and disposal of two seriously overcrowded 1957 vintagefacilities with no room for expansion. The conditions at both facilities

Page 1 of 2II-18

USAR FY 2001 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA Feb 00


USAR CenterRochester, NH

4. PROJECT TITLE

Land Acquisition5. PROJECT NUMBER

CAR 01-11075

11. REQUIREMENT (CONT)do not foster unit training, readiness or preparation for mobilization,and the high operation and maintenance cost will continue to escalate. Thefour USAR units' readiness will continue to deteriorate to unacceptablelevels without proper facilities for training.


(1) Status:(a) Date Design Started........................... N/A(b) Percent Complete as of January 2000............ N/A(c) Date Design 35% Complete..................... N/A(d) Date Design Complete......................... N/A(e) Parametric Cost Estimating Used to Develop Cost. No(f) An energy study and life cycle cost analysis will

be documented during the final design.(g) Type of Design Contract........................ N/A

(2) Basis:(a) Standard or Definitive Design............... No(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used........... N/A

(3) Total Cost (c) = (a) + (b) or (d) + (e) : ($000)(a) Production of Plans and Specifications........ 0(b) All Other Design Costs......................... 0(c) Total.......................................... 0(d) Contract....................................... 0(e) In-house....................................... 0

(4) Contract Award..................................... N/A(5) Construction Start................................. N/A(6) Construction Completion............................ N/A


EquipmentNomenclatureN/A

Fiscal YearProcuring Appropriated CostAppropriation Or Requested ($000)

Point of Contact: LTC Yeldell,703-601-3420


PAGE NO II-19

1. COMPONENTI FY 2001 GUARD AND RESERVE

2. DATE

USAR MILITARY CONSTRUCTION3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION

USAR Center, Camp Bullis, TX5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE UTILIZATION

Feb 004. AREA CONSTR

COST INDEX

0.82


6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUSUSA, Camp Bullis TX - 0 kilometersARNG, Armory, Camp Stanley, TX - 3 kilometersUSAR, Center, San Antonio, TX - 16 kilometersUSAF, Kelly AFB, TX - 24 kilometersUSAR, Center, San Antonio, TX - 29 kilometers




17140 USAR CTR/Unheated Storage 974 m2 1,464 01/99 05/00

8. STATE RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATIONFacilities identified in Item 6 have been examined by the 12 Aug 1999

Joint Service Reserve Component Facility Board for possible (Date)

joint use/expansion. The board recommends unilateral construction.

9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED 0None (Number of Acres)


None


II- 20


2. DATE


COST INDEXUSAR Center, Camp Bullis, TX 0 . 8 2



TOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED CIVILIAN OFFICER ENLISTEDTOTAL

AUTHORIZE 2 0 0 2 66 5 61

ACTUAL 2 0 0 2 109 21 88


STRENGTH


DET1 1/355 FA NB 1 BDE 95 2 4 2 46/95TH AUG BN (MI) 3 BDE 4 2 85

Totals 6 6 1 0 9


TYPE

None

AUTHORIZED ACTUAL



($000)

000


II-21


USAR Feb 003. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TITLEUSAR CenterCamp Bullis, TX USAR CTR/Unheated Storage


0532292A 17140 CAR 01-11118 1,464

9. COST ESTIMATES

ITEMCOST

U/M QUANTITY UNIT COST($000)

PRIMARY FACILITIES: 1094Training Building (10,347 sf) m2 961 1119.67 ( 1076)Unheated Storage (136 sf) m2 13 538.46 ( 7)Antiterrorism/Force Protection LS - - ( 11)

SUPPORTING FACILITIES: 291Telecommunications LS - - ( 96)Site Improvement LS - - ( 193)Antiterrorism/Force Protection LS - - ( 2)

TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST 1385Contingencies ( .0%) 0Supervision and Administration ( 5.7% ) 79



Construct a 60-member US Army Reserve Center (USARC), and an unheatedstorage building. Buildings will be permanent construction with reinforcedconcrete foundations, concrete floor slabs, structural steel frames,masonry veneer walls, standing seam metal roof, HVAC Systems, mechanicalsystems and electrical systems, and security systems (fire alarm connectedvia radio and security system telephone lines for intrusion alarms).Supporting facilities include land clearing, paving, fencing, general siteimprovements, and extension of utilities to serve projects. Forceprotection (physical security) measures will be incorporated into designincluding maximum feasible standoff distance from roads, parking areas, andvehicle unloading areas, berms, heavy landscaping, and bollards to preventaccess when standoff distance cannot be maintained. Air Conditioning: 88kw.11. REQUIREMENT: 974 m2 Adequate: 0m2 Substandard: 0m2PROJECT: Construct a 60-member USARC and an unheated storage building.(Current Mission)

REQUIREMENT: This project provides a 60-member training facility withadministrative, classroom, educational, storage, and support areas for oneUSARF School/Training Battalion on a currently master planned site at CampBullis, Texas. Also, the project provides for an unheated storage buildingand a privately owned vehicle (POV) parking. An intrusion detection systemis provided to support fire and security alarm requirements.

Page 1 of 3

II-22


FY 2001 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONUSAR CenterCamp Bullis, TX

4. PROJECT TITLE

USAR CTR/Unheated Storage


USAR Feb 00

5. PROJECT NUMBER

CAR 01-11118

CURRENT SITUATION: One USARF School/Training Battalion and one MilitaryIntelligence detachment are currently housed at Camp Bullis in five WWIIwood buildings. Building 5903 is the main administrative building,constructed in 1930, and consists of 483 square meters. Buildings 5122 and5123, both constructed in 1930, consisting of 335 and 241 square metersrespectively are used as classroom facilities. Building 5906, constructedin 1951, consists of 53 square meters, is used as publication storage.Building 5907, constructed in 1930, consisting of 53 square meters, is theonly men's and women's toilet facility. Buildings 5122, 5123, 5903, and5906 do not have toilet facilities. All of the buildings are in variousstages of advance deterioration including structural damage. In two of the1930 buildings, the ceiling joists are bowing down in the center forcingthe exterior walls to lean outward approximately two inches. Estimatedcost for repair greatly exceeds the replacement value due to the structuraldamage and advanced deterioration in all of the buildings.

IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Units will be prohibited from properly conductingtraining and maintaining their readiness and mobilization objectives withthe continued use of substandard and overcrowded facilities. Additionaldeterioration or severe weather could make the existing structures unsafe.The unit will have to be relocated in the near future, possibly into aleased facility.

ADDITIONAL: This project was coordinated with the Regional Support Commandand the installation physical security plan and no forceprotection/combating terrorism measures other than those required byregulations and design guides for protecting Federal property are included.An economic analysis was prepared and used in evaluating this project.Alternative methods of meeting this requirement were explored duringproject development. This project is the most feasible option to meet therequirement. Parametric estimates were not used to develop project costs.

Page 2 of 3

II-23

1. COMPONENT


USAR Feb 00


USAR CenterCamp Bullis, TX

4. PROJECT TITLE

USAR CTR/Unheated Storage5. PROJECT NUMBER

CAR 01-11118


(1) Status:(a) Date Design Started............................. 01/99(b) Percent Complete as of January 2000 ........... 50%(c) Date Design 35% Complete........................ 06/99(d) Date Design Complete............................ 05/00

(e) Parametric Cost Estimating Used to Develop Cost. No(f) An energy study and life cycle cost analysis will

be documented during the final design.(g) Type of Design Contract.............Desiqn-Bid-Build

(2) Basis:(a) Standard or Definitive Design................... No(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used ............. N/A

(3) Total Cost (c) = (a) + (b) or (d) + (e) : ($000)(a) Production of Plans and Specifications .......... 99(b) All Other Design Costs .......................... 54(c) Total ........................................... 153(d) Contract ........................................ 153(e) In-house ........................................ 0

(4) Contract Award........................................ 11/00(5) Construction Start .................................. 02/01(6) Construction Completion ............................. 02/02

b. Equipment associated with this project which will be providedFrom other appropriations:

Fiscal YearEquipment Procuring Appropriated CostNomenclature Appropriation Or Requested ($000)Furniture OMAR 2002 106Wire Partitions OMAR 2001 14Shelving OMAR 2001 17

TOTAL 137


PAGE NO II-24


2. DATE


USAR Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX


COST INDEX

0.82



6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUSUSAR, Center, Camp Bullis, TX - 32 kilometersUSA, San Antonio TX - 2 kilometersUSAR, Center, San Antonio, TX - 24 kilometers

I



17140 USAR CTR/OMS/ECS

COST DESIGN STATUS


12,264 m2 13,678 02/98 06/00

8. STATE RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATIONFacilities identified in Item 6 have been examined by the 12 Aug 1999Joint Service Reserve Component Facility Board for possible (Date)

joint use/expansion. The board recommends unilateral construction.9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED

None0

(Number of Acres)


None


II- 25



2. DATE

USAR Feb 003. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION

USAR Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX



AUTHORIZE

ACTUAL



42 6 27 9 1612 360 1252

35 3 23 9 1281 244 1037


STRENGTH

UNIT DESIGNATION

7210 USA MED SPT UNIT5501 HOSP USA SEC 15501 HOSP USA SEC 25501 SEC VET USAH5501 SEC BLOOD USAH0228 HSP CBT(USAR)416TH AUG ENGR SPT GP-SW416TH FE TM, SAN ANTONIOUNITS NOT SHOWNTotals

AUTHORIZED ACTUAL

42 73520 61076 5628 1124 11282 316 165 5

619 496

1612 1281




Wheeled Vehicles 229 229Trailers 228 228

Totals 457 457



($000)

000


II-26


Feb 003. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TITLEUSAR CenterFort Sam Houston, TX USAR CTR/OMS/ECS


0532292A 17140 CAR 01-10045 13,678

9. COST ESTIMATES


PRIMARY FACILITIES: 11148Training Building (95,990 sf) m2 8,918 949.99 ( 8472)OMS Alteration (6,180 sf) m2 574 470.38 ( 270)ECS (24,228 sf) m2 2,251 982.67 ( 2212)Unheated Storage (5,612 sf) m2 521 324.38 ( 169)Antiterrorism/Force Protection LS - - ( 25)

SUPPORTING FACILITIES: 1792Telecommunications LS - - ( 360)Site Improvement Trng/Strg LS - - ( 639)Site Improvement ECS LS - - ( 568)Demo Dodd USARC (29,300 sf) m2 2722 74.94 ( 204)Antiterrorism/Force Protection LS - - ( 21)




Construct a 1,500-member US Army Reserve Center (USARC), an EquipmentConcentration Site (ECS) maintenance building, and alter an existingOrganizational Maintenance Shop (OMS/DS-GS). Buildings will be permanentconstruction with reinforced concrete foundations, concrete floor slabs,structural steel frames, masonry veneer, HVAC, plumbing, and electricalsystems Supporting facilities include land clearing, paving, fencing,general site improvements, and extension of utilities to serve projects.Project will include sufficient electrical, mechanical and security systems(fire alarm connected via radio and security system telephone lines forintrusion alarms). Force protection (physical security) measures will beincorporated into design including maximum feasible standoff distance fromroads, parking areas, vehicle unloading areas, berms, heavy landscaping,and bollards to prevent access when standoff distance cannot be maintained.Air Conditioning: 70 kw.

11. REQUIREMENT: 12,264 m2 Adequate: 0m2 Substandard: 0m2PROJECT: Construct a 1,500-member USARC, an ECS, and alter an existing OMSwith Direct Support-General Support (DS-GS) capability. (Current Mission)

REQUIREMENT: This project will provide facilities necessary to conduct andsupport training of the Reserve Components by eliminating overcrowdedconditions in four government-owned centers on or around Fort Sam Houston.This 1,500-member training facility will provide administrative areas,classrooms library, learning center, assembly hall, arms vault, kitchen,

Page 1 of 4

II-27



3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONUSAR CenterFort Sam Houston, TX


USAR CTR/OMS/ECS CAR 01-10045


and unit storage functions for 15 reserve units and one ECS. The existing1960 vintage Dodd Field USARC will be demolished to provide the site forthe new USARC. An alteration to the existing OMS maintenance shop willconform with the various units space requirements to accomplishorganizational maintenance and direct and general support (DS-GS)maintenance for tenant units. An ECS maintenance facility will be providedconsisting of 13 workbays and maintenance administrative areas to support26 mechanics, 18 maintenance administrative personnel, seven warehousepersonnel, and one small arms repairer. The project will also provideadequate parking space for all military and privately owned vehicles. The217th Transportation Company is authorized Heavy Equipment TransporterSystem (HETS). Due to the large size of this equipment, a large amount ofspace is required for both parking the vehicles and for operator training.Requirements for maintenance also have to be considered due to size of theequipment. One HETS requires the use of two 40-foot maintenance bays.This project also includes the 228th Combat Support Hospital, amulti-component unit with an anticipated 35 full-time personnel, whichactivates in September 2001.

CURRENT SITUATION: Two 416th Engineer Command units are currently housedin building 2250 on Fort Sam Houston. This facility was constructed in the1890's. It is a category II historical structure constructed of loadbearing masonry walls. The original porch was enclosed in 1938 as troophousing. The loads placed on the porch are causing separation from thebuilding. Similar facilities have been assigned a risk assessment code ofII-B by their Active Army occupants due to this same condition. Ahistorical restoration project by Fort Sam Houston Director of Public Workscompleted in 1997 restored the open porches reducing the available floorspace by one third. The facility provides only administrative space.These buildings do not have an assembly hall, kitchen, arms vault,classrooms, or storage space. The lighting and electrical systems are poorand outdated.

The GEN Stillwell Memorial USARC was constructed in 1981. The facilityhouses one Regional Support Group, one Military History Det, one PublicAffairs Det, one Adjutant General Det, one Transportation Company, oneMilitary Intelligence Co, one USAR Garrison Support Unit, one USARCReadiness Assistance Team, one Adjutant Genera.1 BN, one Medical Det, onetraining BDE, one Chaplain Det, one Civil Affairs BDE, and one ECS. Thefacility is overcrowded with a current utilization rate of 153 percent. Itdoes not have adequate administrative, storage, and maintenance space. Theexisting maintenance shop is a 10 work bay (5 drive through) facility with

Page 2 of 4

II-28


FY 2001 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA


USAR CenterFort Sam Houston, TX

USAR Feb 00


USAR CTR/OMS/ECS CAR 01-10045


a current utilization rate of 187 percent. The 44 full-time ECS employeesutilize the majority of the maintenance space. This restricts the assignedunits in the performance of their mission.

The Boswell USARC was constructed in 1962. This is a government-ownedfacility with a current utilization rate of 185 percent. Two maintenancecompanies (DS-GS), one maintenance battalion (DS-GS), and one quartermastercompany occupy the center. The OMS utilization rate is 216 percent.

The Callaghan USARC was constructed in 1965. This is a government-ownedfacility with a current utilization rate of 175 percent for the trainingcenter and 315 percent for the maintenance shop. Two engineer companies,one engineer detachment, and one engineer team will remain in thisfacility.

The Dodd Field USARC was constructed in 1960. This is a government-ownedfacility with a projected utilization rate of over 275 percent upon theactivation of AC/RC Combat Support Unit and Medical Det with 35 full-timepersonnel. The facility will house two Hospital units, one Medical Det,and one Medical Support unit. This is a small substandard facility thatrequires complete renovation and construction of additional space tosupport the reserve mission. Due to the magnitude of therenovation/addition of the Dodd Field facility, it's more advantageous tothe Government to demolish the Dodd Field Facility and construct thisproject, than to develop two separate projects. Therefore, this facilitywill be demolished and the assigned units will be accounted for in thisproject. The current site is adequate for the proposed MCAR project.

IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: The units will not be able to properly train andbe prepared to meet their readiness and mobilization objectives with thecontinued use of substandard and overcrowded facilities. Minorconstruction projects may be required at each existing facility to supportthe current Army Reserve mission and provide adequate space to reduceexcessive overcrowding conditions.

ADDITIONAL: This project has been coordinated with the installationphysical security plan and no force protection/combating terrorism measuresother than those required by regulations and design guides for protectingFederal property are included. An economic analysis has been prepared andutilized in evaluating this project. Alternative methods of meeting thisrequirement have been explored during project development. This project isthe most feasible option to meet the requirement. Parametric estimates

Page 3 of 4

II-29



USAR CenterFort Sam Houston, TX


USAR CTR/OMS/ECS

11. REQUIREMENT (CONT)were not used to develop project costs.

CAR 01-10045


(1) Status:(a) Date Design Started.............................02/98(b) Percent Complete as of January 2000 ............ 65%(c) Date Design 35% Complete........................09/99(d) Date Design Complete...........................06/00(e) Parametric Cost Estimating Used to Develop Cost. No(f) An energy study and life cycle cost analysis will

be documented during the final design.(g) Type of Design Contract.............Design-Bid-Build

(2) Basis:(a) Standard or Definitive Design ................ No(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used ............ N/A

(3) Total Cost (c) = (a) + (b) or (d) + (e) : ($000)(a) Production of Plans and Specifications.......... 123(b) All Other Design Costs........................ 1280(c) Total ......................................... 1403(d) Contract ...................................... 1403(e) In-house ...................................... 0

(4) Contract Award......................................10/00(5) Construction Start..................................10/00(6) Construction Completion.............................12/02



Fiscal YearEquipment Procuring Appropriated CostNomenclature Appropriation Or Requested ($000)Furniture OMAR 2002 413Kitchen Equipment OMAR 2001 194Wire Partitions OMAR 2001 136Metal Lockers OMAR 2001 116Dehumidifier OMAR 2001 1Shelving OMAR 2001 114

TOTAL: 974


PAGE NO II-30


2. DATE


USAR Center, Fort A P Hill, VA


COST INDEX

0.865. FREQUENCY AND TYPE UTILIZATION


6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUSUSAR, Center, Richmond, VA - 80 kilometersUSAR, Center, Richmond, VA - 84 kilometersUSAR, Center, Richmond, VA - 89 kilometersUSMC, Center, Richmond, VA - 89 kilometers



17140 USAR CTR/OMS/AMSA

COST DESIGN STATUS


2,394 m2 4,275 02/99 06/00

8. STATE RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATIONFacilities identified in Item 6 have been examined by the 08 Apr 1999

Joint Service Reserve Component Facility Board for possible (Date)

joint use/expansion. The board recommends unilateral construction.

II-31

9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED

None0

(Number of Acres)


None



MILITARY CONSTRUCTION Feb 002. DATE

USAR3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION

USAR Center, Fort A P Hill, VA



12. RESERVE UNIT DATA ASGD/AUTH 87% STRENGTH


1478 LOG SPT BN 50 50DET 2, 377 CM CO 23 17DET 1, 88TH MP CO 33 25

Totals 106 92


TYPE

Wheeled VehiclesTrailersTotals

AUTHORIZED ACTUAL

167 16724 24191 191



000


II-32

AUTHORIZE

ACTUAL



11 4 4 3 106 10 96

11 4 4 3 92 10 82

($000)


USAR Feb 003. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TITLEUSAR CenterFort A P Hill, VA USAR CTR/OMS/AMSA


0532292A 17140 CAR 01-10718 4,275

9. COST ESTIMATES

ITEMCOST

U/M QUANTITY UNIT COST($000)

PRIMARY FACILITIES: 3228Training Building (20,038 sf) m2 1,862 1258.86 ( 2344)Maintenance Building (5185 sf) m2 482 1300.83 ( 627)Unheated Storage (536 sf) m2 50 760.00 ( 38)Package Wastewtr Trmt Plant LS - - ( 180)Antiterrorism/Force Protection LS - - ( 39)


TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST 4044Contingencies (.0 %) 0Supervision and Administration (5.7 %) 231



Construct a one-story US Army Reserve Center (USARC), an unheated storagefacility and a one-story Organizational Maintenance Shop (OMS) with abranch maintenance activity collocated in the maintenance shop. Thebuildings will be permanent construction with reinforced concretefoundation, concrete floor slabs, structural steel frame, masonry veneerexterior walls, standing seam metal or shingled roofing, mechanical andelectrical systems. The training building and maintenance facility will bedesigned for maximum energy efficiency. Ground source heating and coolingsystems will be considered. Supporting facilities will include paving,fencing washrack with oil/water separator, site improvements and extensionof utilities to service the project. The project will be protected by fireand intrusion alarms systems. Project will include provision of a packagewastewater treatment system designed to handle waste streams from thetraining and maintenance buildings. Force protection (physical security)measures will be incorporated into design including maximum feasiblestandoff distance from roads, parking areas, and vehicle unloading areas,berms, heavy landscaping, and bollards to prevent access when standoffdistance cannot be maintained. Air Conditioning: 193 kw11. REQUIREMENT: 2,394 m2 Adequate: 0m2 Substandard: 0m2PROJECT: Construct a USARC, OMS with a Branch Maintenance Activity (BMA)from ECS 88 (G) and an unheated storage building. (Current Mission)

REQUIREMENT: This project will provide a 100-member training facility with

Page 1 of 3II-33



3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONUSAR CenterFort A P Hill, VA


USAR CTR/OMS/AMSA CAR 01-10718


administrative areas, classrooms, library, learning center, assembly hall,arms vault, and unit storage for three units and the BMA located on FortA.P. Hill, VA. These four USAR elements are from three separate GeneralOfficer Commands from two different Regional Support Commands. The OMS/BMA(88) will provide space for training to accomplish the organizationalmaintenance level by reserve units and storage for the vehicles associatedwith BMA (88). The unheated storage building will provide the requiredspace to store large items. These items, like tents, do not need aclimate-controlled environment. The project will provide adequate parkingspace for military and privately owned vehicles. Project will include anappropriately sized wastewater treatment system to handle the waste flowsgenerated by the training and maintenance buildings.

CURRENT SITUATION: The training units assigned to Fort A.P. Hill, VAcurrently occupy World War II wooden facilities that require extensivemaintenance and repair to keep a minimally acceptable environment for thesoldiers. These deteriorating facilities hamper the units' ability toproperly train soldiers for Military Occupational Specialty qualificationand sustainment training. The units occupy eight different buildings thatare not within suitable distance to properly control their soldiers orproperly support effective staff coordination. The existing Camp Penderwastewater treatment plant does not have sufficient treatment capacity tosupport the additional wastewater generated by the new reserve facilitycomplex.

IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: The units will continue to utilize substandard,overcrowded, energy inefficient World War II wooden facilities. Theseoutdated facilities will continue to place unnecessary stress on alreadylimited Operations and Maintenance, Army Reserve annual operating budgets.Additionally, the facilities now used do not meet the space criteria andspecifications as established in AR 140-483, Army Reserve Land andFacilities Management. Continued use of these substandard facilities willnegatively impact morale, recruiting, retention, and the mission readinessof all assigned units.

ADDITIONAL: This project has been coordinated with the installationphysical security plan and no force protection/combating terrorism measuresother than those required by regulations and design guides for protectingFederal property are included. An economic analysis has been prepared andutilized in evaluating this project. Alternative methods of meeting thisrequirement have been explored during project development. This project isthe most feasible option to meet the requirement. Parametric estimates

Page 2 of 3

II-34

1. COMPONENT


USAR Feb 00


USAR CenterFort A P Hill, VA

4. PROJECT TITLE

USAR CTR/OMS/AMSA5. PROJECT NUMBER

CAR 01-10718

11. REQUIREMENT (CONT)have not been used to develop project costs.


(1) Status:(a) Date Design Started............................02/99(b) Percent Complete as of January 2000............ 35%(c) Date Design 35% Complete.......................06/99(d) Date Design Complete...........................06/00(e) Parametric Cost Estimating Used to Develop Cost. No(f) An energy study and life cycle cost analysis will

be documented during the final design.(g ) Type of Design Contract............Design-Bid-Build

(2) Basis:(a) Standard or Definitive Design................ . Yes(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used.........Ft.Eustis

(3) Total Cost (c) = (a) + (b) or (d) + (e) : ($000)(a) Production of Plans and Specifications......... 142(b) All Other Design Costs......................... 263(c) Total.......................................... 405(d) Contract....................................... 405(e) In-house.................................. 0

(4) Contract Award..................................... 10/00(5) Construction Start................................. 02/01(6) Construction Completion.............................03/02


Fiscal YearEquipment Procuring Appropriated CostNomenclature Appropriation Or Requested ($000)Furniture OMAR 2002 317Wire Partitions OMAR 2001 147Metal Lockers OMAR 2001 203Dehumidifier OMAR 2001 1Shelving OMAR 2001 203

TOTAL: 871


PAGE NO II-35


2. DATE


COST INDEX

AMSA #137 ( M ) Tacoma, WA5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE UTILIZATION

1.08


6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUSUSNR, Center, Tacoma, WA - 2 kilometersUSAR, Center, Tacoma, WA - 6 kilometersUSAR, Center, Fort Lewis, WA - 13 kilometersOTHER, Camp Murray, WA - 14 kilometersUSA, Fort Lewis, WA - 16 kilometers


CATEGORYCODE PROJECT TITLE SCOPE

COST($000)

DESIGN STATUS

START COMPLETE

17140 USAR CTR/OMS/AMSA Marine 6,535 m2 14,759 05/99 10/00

8. STATE RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATIONFacilities identified in Item 6 have been examined by the 20 Apr 1999Joint Service Reserve Component Facility Board for possible (Date)

joint use/expansion. The board recommends unilateral construction.9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED 0None

(Number of Acres)


None

FISCAL COSTYEAR ($000)

II-36


2. DATE


COST INDEXAMSA #137 (M), Tacoma, WA 1.08



OFFICER ENLISTED CIVILIANTOTAL TOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED

AUTHORIZE 15 1 9 5 367 46 321

ACTUAL 15 1 9 5 281 37 244


STRENGTH


175TH TRANS CO(FLOAT) CFT) 205 134467TH TRANSPORTATION CO 112 94805TH TRANS DET (LSV) 32 35653 DET (HARBOR MSTR OP) 18 18Totals 367 281



Wheeled Vehicles 20 20Trailers 26 26Watercraft 27 25

Totals 73 71


($000)

Air Pollution 0Water Pollution 0Safety and Occupational Health 0


II-37


USAR Feb 003. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TITLEAMSA #137 (M)Tacoma, WA USAR CTR/OMS/AMSA Marine


0532292A 17140 CAR 01-10522 14,759

9. COST ESTIMATES


PRIMARY FACILITIES: 8567Pier Support Building LS - - ( 300)Unheated Storage (4268 sf) m2 397 884.13 ( 351)Training Building (42617 sf) m2Maintenance Building (23457 sf) m2

3,959 1274.56 ( 5046)2,179 1294.17 ( 2820)

Antiterrorism/Force Protection LS - - ( 50)SUPPORTING FACILITIES: 5396Demolition of Building 580 m2 2601 129.18 ( 336)Repairs & Improvements to Pier LS - - ( 3461)Telecommunications LS - - ( 63)Site Improvement LS - - ( 1495)Antiterrorism/Force Protection LS - - ( 41)




Construct a three-story 400-member US Army Reserve Center (USARC), anOrganizational Maintenance Shop (OMS), and Area Maintenance SupportActivity (Marine) (AMSA (M)). The building is permanent construction,reinforced concrete foundation and floor slabs, steel frame, architecturalstanding seam metal roof on steel joists, metal and glass panel exteriorfinish, mechanical and electrical systems, and security system (fire alarmconnected via radio and security system telephone lines for intrusionalarms). Force protection (physical security) measures will beincorporated into design including maximum feasible standoff distance fromroads, parking areas, and vehicle unloading areas, berms, heavylandscaping and bollards to prevent access when standoff distance cannotbe maintained. Supporting facilities include demolishing the existingon-site structure, renovating/improving the existing 366 m pier. Airconditioning 2290 kw.11. REQUIREMENT: 6,535 m2 Adequate: 0m2 Substandard: 7,024 m2PROJECT: Construct a USARC OMS, and AMSA (M). (Current Mission)

REQUIREMENT: This facility will provide a 400-member training facilitywith administrative areas, classroom, library, learning center, assemblyhall, arms vault, and unit storage functions for four US Army Reserve unitsand an AMSA (M) . The maintence shop will provide space for training toaccomplish organizational maintenance and for daily and cyclic maintenanceof the watercraft by the AMSA (M) and units. The training and

. Page 1 of 3

II-38



3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIONAMSA #137 (M)Tacoma, WA I

4 . PROJECT TITLE

USAR CTR/OMS/AMSA Marine


5. PROJECT NUMBER

CAR 01-10522

administrative areas will be located adjacent to the AMSA (M) shop. Itwill also provide adequate privately owned vehicle parking for thefull-time staff. The existing 366 meter pier will receive improvements andrenovation.

CURRENT SITUATION: Current requirements were predicated by the migrationof these units in accordance w th the USAR/NGB Off-Site Agreement.Originally built by the US Navy in the 40's, the site consists of acondemned wood/metal two-story warehouse and a pier of wooden and concreteconstruction. The pier is in need of renovation. The USAR units arepresently located in a government-owned facility located four miles fromthe pier. This facility is at 361% utilization and is inadequate foradministrative, educational, assembly, and maintenance. The AMSA personneare working out of temporary trailers positioned on the pier. Rentedport-o-lets are the only authorized latrines on site. All maintenance onwatercraft is performed outside on the pier in all kinds of weather,unsheltered.

IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: The units will not be able to conduct trainingproperly and be prepared to meet their readiness and mobilizationobjectives with the continued use of an overcrowded facility which is notcollocated with their watercraft. AMSA (M) personnel will continue to besubjected to unsafe and substandard working conditions without permanentfacilities.

ADDITIONAL: This project has been coordinated with the Regional SupportCommand physical security plan and no force protection/combating terrorismmeasures other than those required by regulations and design guides forprotecting Federal property are included. An economic analysis has beenprepared and utilized in evaluating this project. Alternative methods ofmeeting this requirement have been explored during project development.This project is the most feasible option to meet the requirement.Parametric estimates have not been used to develop project costs.

Page 2 of 3

II-39

1. COMPONENT


USAR Feb 00


AMSA #137 (M)Tacoma, WA

4. PROJECT TITLE

USAR CTR/OMS/AMSA Marine5. PROJECT NUMBER

CAR 01-10522


(1) Status:(a) Date Design Started...........................05/99(b) Percent Complete as of January 2000........... 35%(c) Date Design 35%............................... 09/99(d) Date Design...................................10/00(e) Parametric Cost Estimating Used to Develop Cost. No(f) An energy study and life cycle cost analysis will


(2) Basis:(a) Standard or Definitive Design................. No(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used............ N/A

(3) Total Cost (c) = (a) + (b) or (d) + (e): ($000)(a) Production of Plans and Specifications......... 405(b) All Other Design Costs......................... 900(c) Total......................................... 1305(d) Contract...................................... 1305(e) In-house.................................. 0

(4) Contract Award.....................................01/01(5) Construction Start.................................03/01(6) Construction Completion............................03/02


Fiscal YearEquipment Procuring Appropriated CostNomenclature Appropriation Or Requested ($000)Furniture OMAR 2002 235Kitchen Equipment OMAR 2001 100Wire Partitions OMAR 2001 127Metal Lockers OMAR 2001 28Dehumidifier OMAR 2001 1Shelving OMAR 2001 62

TOTAL: 553

Point of Contact: LTC Cole,703-601-3418

PAGE NO II-40

1. COMPONENT


USAR Feb 00

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TITLE

Worldwide Unspecified Unspecified Minor Construction


0532292A 171-40 N/A 1,917

9. COST ESTIMATES

ITEM U/M QUANTITY UNIT COST COST($000)

Unspecified Minor Construction LS 1,917


Provide a lump sum for unspecified minor construction projects, nototherwise authorized by law, including construction, alteration, orconversion of permanent or temporary facilities. Force protection(physical security) measures will be incorporated into design includingmaximum feasible standoff distance from roads, parking areas, and vehicleunloading areas, berms, heavy landscaping and bollards to prevent accesswhen standoff distance cannot be maintained.

11. REQUIREMENT: This program provides the means of accomplishing minormilitary construction projects that are not now identified, but which areanticipated to arise during the fiscal year as critical, unforeseenrequirements, and which fall within the purview and statutory fundinglimits of the unspecified minor construction program.

CURRENT SITUATION: During the fiscal year, the USAR will continue to beaffected by changes in force structure and various enhancements to unitand logistical readiness, including distribution of vehicles, equipment,and other mission essential supplies. These changes often generateunforeseen (emergent) requirements for minor military constructionprojects These urgent unforeseen projects address high nationalpriorities such as environmental protection, health, safety, and criticalmission requirements.

POC: LTC Anthony Yeldell, 703-601-3420

PAGE NO II-41


FY 2001 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATAUSAR Feb 003. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TITLE

Worldwide Unspecified Planning and Design


0532292A 171-40 N/A 6,4009. COST ESTIMATES

ITEM U N QUANTITY UNIT COST COST($000)

Planning and Design LS 6,400


Provide funding to prepare engineering plans, designs, drawings andspecifications required to execute the USAR military construction program.

11. REQUIREMENT: This funding is required to provide design andengineering services for Military Construction, Army Reserve (MCAR), andUnspecified Minor projects, including value engineering, and continueddevelopment of design criteria and standard (conventional) functionallayouts. Funds will be used by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)districts for in-house designs, Architect-Engineer (A-E) contractors, andadministrative support functions. These funds are required foraccomplishment of initial correction, review, reproduction andadvertisement of projects in the FY 00 program; for advancement to finaldesign of projects in FY 01; for initiation of design of projects in FY02; and for initiation of preconcept design activities for projects in FY03. The funds request for the annual planning and design requirementincludes value enginering, the costs to update standards and criteria,guide specifications, and technical manuals.

POC: LTC Anthony Yeldell, 703-601-3420

PAGE NO II-42

Documents

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY UNITED STATES ARMY · PDF fileFuture Years Plan v-vi Section I - Budget Appendix Extract Language ... Shop/Area Maintenance Support Activity 4,275 4,275 C II-33