35
DEPOT LEVEL MAINTENANCE OF THE PROPELLANT HANDLERS ENSEMBLE DENNIS J. DUDZINSKI LIFE SUPPORT MANAGER WYLE LABORATORIES (321) 853-9333 [email protected]

DEPOT LEVEL MAINTENANCE OF THE PROPELLANT HANDLERS … · DEPOT LEVEL MAINTENANCE OF THE PROPELLANT HANDLERS ENSEMBLE DENNIS J. DUDZINSKI LIFE SUPPORT MANAGER WYLE LABORATORIES (321)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

DEPOT LEVEL MAINTENANCE OF THE PROPELLANT HANDLERS ENSEMBLE

DENNIS J. DUDZINSKILIFE SUPPORT MANAGER

WYLE LABORATORIES(321) 853-9333

[email protected]

Maintenance

• Perform all levels of maintenance for all NASA and Air Force customers– Inspection– Repair– Overhaul– Rebuild/Manufacture

Maintenance

• Inventory comprised of over 10,000 pieces of equipment– Protective Clothing/Hazmat Suits– Cryogenic Equipment– Self Contained Breathing Apparatus– Emergency Breathing Equipment– Airline Breathing Apparatus– Medical Resuscitators

Operations

• Preoperations setup of equipment• Assist onsite

– Donning/Doffing Equipment• Large Volume – over 100 “suitings”/day

– Monitor Operations– Transport “Suited” operators

• Equipment/Personnel Deployment “offsite”

PPE Inventory

SCAPE

• Self Contained Atmospheric Protective Ensemble– Predates Shuttle Operations (1960s)– Equipment evolved to accommodate the

needs for all programs– Current SCAPE (Propellant Handlers

Ensemble – PHE) in use since 1987

Category I SCAPE

• Mobile• Internal Cryogenic Air Supply

(Environmental Control Unit)

Category I SCAPE

Category I SCAPE

Category IV SCAPE

• Airline Supply• Portable Air Supply for Ingress/Egress

Category IV SCAPE

CATEGORY IV SCAPE

PHE

• Available in two modes– Self Contained (CATEGORY I)– Airline Supplied (CATEGORY IV)

• Incorporates many features– Detachable Boots and Gloves– “Bubble” or Flat Visor– Internal Air Distribution System

PHE

• Protection Factor (PF) Testing• Protection Factor Test Facility (PSTF) at

Aberdeen Proving Grounds– Passing percentages of 100% at a PF of

50,000 for preoperational and operational exercises

Maintenance Process

• Performed each time the ensemble is worn and restores to reusable condition

• Preserves established protection factors• Process incorporates original design

requirements and knowledge obtained by “Lessons Learned”

Cleaning• Performed after each use• Shower (inside and outside) with warm water

and biodegradable detergent

Drying

• Drying accomplished by forced warm air

Visual Inspection

• Light Inspection (small holes)• Checklist of criteria to be performed• Material degradation identified

– Damage Includes Holes, Tears, Scuffs, Damaged Components

– Repairs accomplished and could include replacement of suspect fabric or rebuild

Performance Testing

• Pressure (leak) test

Performance Testing

• Relief Valve Reverse Flow (Leak) Test• Mitigate vapor Intrusion during transient

negative pressure effects

Performance Testing

• Airline Adapter Flow Test

Performance Testing

• Communications Test

Final Inspection• Quality Assurance Final Acceptance

– Validates that all tests have been performed– Performs final visual inspection – Stamps approval on “go” tag affixed to suit

Boot/Glove Performance Testing

• Each Boot and Glove tested after use– Pressurized and submerged in water– Bubble leakage determines pass/fail

• Visual Inspection– Material Degradation

Boot/Glove Performance Testing

• Glove/Boot Pressure Test

Ancillary Equipment

• Environmental Control Unit– Utilizes Liquid Air (20% - 30% Oxygen)– Recycle and Performance Testing

Ancillary Equipment

• Liquid Air Cart – Fill, Operate and Maintain

Data Collection

• Infield Data includes:– Operator/Date/Location of Operation– Operator Comments/Concerns– Commodity (Chemical) Used During

Operation– Damage noted during visual inspection– Verification of Performance Test (Results)

Reporting Application

• Location/Operator-specific information• Distributed to Users• Enables review of operational areas, work

practices or procedures for causes of damage – Results in damage prevention– Awareness leading to improving operational

safety– Tracks equipment performance

SCAPE INFIELD DAMAGE

0.000

5.000

10.000

Mar-05

Apr-05

May-05

Jun-05

Jul-05

Aug-05

Sep-05

Oct-05

Nov-05

Dec-05

Jan-06

Feb-06

MONTH AND YEAR

DA

MA

GE

RA

TIO

6.43N/A06.5N/A1.571.21N/AN/AN/A0.980.55

2.784.63.934.112.30.640.904.25N/A0.402.880.64

N/A4.75N/AN/AN/A2.00N/A2.061.81N/A2.820.50

7.956.5N/A9.5N/AN/A2.50N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

FEBJANDECNOVOCTSEPAUGJULJUNMAYAPRMARMONTH

060605050505050505050505YEAR

PERCENTAGE OF DAMAGE (RATIO)s PER MONTH BY SPECIFIC LOCATION

a. Damage ratio is derived by: TOTAL DAMAGE/TOTAL RECORDED SUITINGSb. Damage is defined as operator-incurred defects during use of ensemble.

Additional Reports

• Infield Performance• Ad Hoc Reports

Anomaly Investigation

• Anomalies recorded during operation• Investigation results

– Findings added to “Lessons Learned”– Potential maintenance improvements – Potential operational improvements (Safety)– Potential equipment modification (Design)– Potential training improvements

Investigation Results

• Examples of Findings– Decontamination Shower Head Installed

Backward and Tore Suit– Ground Support Equipment positioned in

operators path leading to recurring damage in ankle area

Summary

• Closed Loop System– Equipment Designed for use in Environment– Data collected during actual use– Data distributed to users, maintainers and

designers– Continuous evolution of process to address

challenges and evaluate improvements to training, ensemble design and operational processes