Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Level 4: General structure of separation system
Cheng-Ching Yu
Dept of Chem. Eng.National Taiwan University
2
Separation Systems• Typical reaction/separation structure
Remark: Focus on reactor exit.
3
Remark: 1. Liquid separation system: column,extraction, azeotropic distillation etc.
2. Two phase: use reactor as a phasesplitter or cool down to 35 C.
4
Steps: 1. Cool down to 35C2. A. phase split exists == Step 3
B. no phase split(i) pressurize(ii) refrigerated partial condenser(iii) to vapor recovery system
3. Design vapor recovery system and liquid separation systems.
Heuristic: phase split is cheap.
5
• Gas recovery systems
location:2
1
3
Location 1: If significant amount of valuable materials are being lost in the purge.
Location 2: If materials are deleterious to the reactor operation.Location 3: Both factors are valid.None: Both factors do not exist.
6
Type: condensationabsorptionadsorptionmembranereaction system (removing CO2, H2S)
Strategy: If vapor flow after the phase split is small, we can consider combining vapor/liquid recovery together.
7
• Liquid separation system
• Light ends
Method- drop the pressure for removal- partial condenser- pasteurization column- stabilizer column
Destination- vent- flare- vapor recovery system
8
• Azeotropes- recycle the azeotropes- split the azeotrope (need two columns for abinary azeotrope).
• Applicability of distillationWhy- handle wide range of throughput- handle wide range of feed composition- ability to produce high purity product
Cases not suited- relative volatility < 1.1
(column can become very expensive)- low molecular weight- high molecular weight heat sensitive materials
9
Basic principle of distillation
Principle
- use boiling point differencefor separation
- described by vapor liquid equilibrium (VLE)
VLE- Txy Diagram
- x1 and y1 in equilibrium
xLK=xHKyLK>yHK
10
Effect of Pressure
- keep the pressure low
P2 > P1
11
Column Configuration
input heatat higher T
remove heatat lower T
12
Column Notation- EMO
13
Realistic View
14
Minimum Reflux Ratio
Understand the effects of changing reflux rate or boilup rate.
15
Total Reflux
Find minimum numberof trays (Nmin)
16
Capital cost vs operating cost (energy)
RR= 1.1~1.2 RRmin
17
Typical Procedure to Set Column Pressure
Remark: Prefer using cooling water as cooling media.
18
Column sequencing
Definitions
- single feed- two products- key components areadjacent in boiling pt.
- column has a condenserand a reboiler
19
Direct vs Indirect (LOF vs HOF)
20
Two Alternatives for NC= 3
/
21
Six Alternatives for NC= 4
22
14 Alternatives for NC= 5
23
Summary
- # of alternatives increasesdrastically
- how do we screen for the bestfew sequences
- what criteria should we use tochoose between alternative sequences
… 104862
24
Heuristics
Ex.A 33% B 33%C 33%(8/2/1)
Ex.A 15% B 15%C 70%(4/2/1)
25
26
Quantitative Measure
Calculate vapor ratesfrom short-cut method:
1. Underwood Eq. (RRmin)2. RR=~1.1 RRmin3. V=(1+RR)D4. Repeat 1-3 for all columns
27
Ternary System- boundary when Qdirect=Qindirect
DI
LKIK
HK
28
• Complete picture for HDA
light ends (H2/CH4) 3.8%product (Benzene) 69.3% reactant (Toluene) 25.7%heavy ends (Diphenyl) 1.2%
29
• Complex column
LOF HOF
SSR SSS
PF
SS
30
31
32
Azeotropic Systems
Minimum-boiling
repulsion
33
Azeotropic Systems-cont
Maximum-boiling
attraction
34
Activity Coefficient- Wilson, NRTL, UNIQUAC, UNIFAC
repulsionvs
attraction
35
Two-liquid phase
Repulsion force is extremely large
36
Two-liquid phase
(a) is a typical system
37
Two-liquid phase- effect of temperature
Effects of temperature (for which case?)
38
Breaking Azeotrope
We have to change something to overcome azeotrope
1. Change P- pressure swing
2. Change gamma- add entrainer
3. Change y- remove vapor across membrane(pervaporization)
39
Pressure Swing
40
Entrainer Addition
Remark: 1. Must change gamma or the ratio of them.2. Can possibly induce phase splitting.3. Too many choices!
41
Design Procedure
42
Design Procedure- In practice
- leave azeotropes until last- try pressure swing- try extractive distillation using entrainer while not causing
phase-split (homogeneous azeotropic distillation)- try adding a (light) entrainer and induce phase-split (heterogeneous azeotropic distillation)
43
References
Books1. Doherty, M. F.; Malone, M. F. Conceptual Design of Distillation Systems,
McGraw-Hill, 2001.an up-to-date book on distillation
2. Douglas, J. M. Conceptual Process Design, McGraw-Hill, 1988.a highly readable and useful book in process design
3. Luyben, W. L.; Wenzel, L. A. Chemical Process Analysis,Prentice-Hall, 1988.an introductory book on material & energy balances
4. Smith, R. Chemical Process Design, McGraw-Hill, 1995.philosophy is similar to the Douglas book with somewhat updated materials
5. Smith, R. Lecture Note on Advanced Distillation System Design, Taipei, 1999.
44
References
Papers
1. Fien, G-J A.; Liu, Y. A. I&EC Res 1994, 33, 2505.a highly readable review paper on azeotropic distillation
2. Guttinger, T. E.; Morari, M. I&EC Res 1996, 35, 4597.look at stability of homogeneous azeotrpic distillation- typical Morari paper
3. Laroche. L.; Bekiaris, N.; Anderson, H. W.; Morari, M. I&EC Res 1992, 31, 2190.explore design aspect of homogeneous azeotropic distillation
4. Hauan, S.; Westerberg, A. W.; Lien, C. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2000,55,1053.first systematic paper investigate the effect of reaction on RCM
5. Venimadhavan, G.; Malone, M. F.; Doherty, M. F. AIChE J. 1999, 45, 546.also explore the effect of reaction on RCM