Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Derivatives: valuation challengesEurobanking 2017Slovenia, May 29, 2017
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Nick van Pelt – Junior Manager
Background• MSc. Quantitative Finance, EUR• BSc. Econometrics & Operations Research, EUR• BA, History, EUR• Certified Financial Risk Manager (FRM), GARP
Contact InformationE-mail: [email protected]
Who am I?
1
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Derivatives: valuation challenges
• Introduction
• Discussion
• Interest rates
• Interest rate swaps: pre-crisis
• Interest rate swaps: post-crisis
• Value adjustments
• Central clearing: MVA
Agenda
2
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Introduction
3
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Characteristics
• A derivative is an instrument whose value depends on, or is derived from, the value of another underlying.
• Examples: futures, forwards, swaps, options, exotics…
• The underlyings include for example stock prices, currencies, interest rates, commodities, inflation, temperature, credit worthiness, etcetera.
• Derivatives play a key role in transferring risks in the economy.
• Derivatives are traded on the exchange or in the over-the-counter (OTC) market where traders working for banks, fund managers and corporate treasurers contact each other directly.
What is a derivative?
4
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Theory
• Pricing and valuation of derivatives is often quite simple… in theory.
Pricing and valuation of derivatives
5
• Share prices follow a Geometric Brownian Motion with constant mean andvolatility
• Short selling of stocks is allowed
• No transaction costs
• No taxes
• All securities are infinitely divisible
• There are no arbitrage opportunities
• Continuous trading
• It is possible to borrow and lend cash at a constant risk-free rate
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Reality
• But in reality…
Pricing and valuation of derivatives
6
“One way of ensuring that you fully understand a financial instrument is to value it. If a corporation does not have the in-house capability to value an instrument, it should not trade it.” © John C. Hull
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Looking at derivatives from different angles
Environment
7
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Looking at derivatives from different angles
Environment
8
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Discussion
9
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Introduction
“True or false: hedging with derivatives always introduces risk.”
Derivatives
10
Hedge or not hedge?
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Introduction
“Why has the outstanding notionals and market values of derivatives in the over-the-counter market declined substantially over the past few years?”
Derivatives
11
Amounts outstanding notionals of over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives
Contract
types
Notional amount outstanding (billion USD) (Gross) market values (billion USD)
2012 2013 2014 2015 2012 2013 2014 2015
Foreign
exchange67,358 70,553 75,043 70,446 2,313 2,284 2,936 2,579
Interest
Rate492,605 584,799 505,431 384,025 19,038 14,200 15,586 10,148
Equity
linked6,251 6,560 6,968 7,141 600 700 612 495
CDS 25,068 21,020 16,399 12,294 848 653 593 421
Other 41,815 25,496 22,541 17,685 1,808 724 802 558
Total 635,685 710,633 628,251 492,911 24,953 18,825 20,847 14,498
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Introduction
“True or false: the importance of value adjustments in pricing and valuation of derivatives is increasing.”
Derivatives
12
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Interest rates
Types of interest rates
13
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Which rate would you consider most risk-free?
Which rate would you consider most risk-free?
A. London interbank offered rate (LIBOR)
B. Euro interbank offered rate (EURIBOR)
C. Euro OverNight Index Average (EONIA)
D. (Overnight) repo rate
E. Other rate?
And why is a proxy for the risk-free interest rate important for derivatives…?
Risk-free rate
14
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
LIBOR
• The London interbank offered rate or LIBOR, is viewed as the cost banks pay to borrow funds from other banks in the interbank market.
• It gives an indication of the average rate a leading bank, for a given currency, can obtain unsecured funding for a given period in a given currency.
• The currencies are the British pound sterling, US dollar, Euro, Japanese yen and the Swiss frank.
• It is compiled each day by ICE Benchmark Administration Limited, for maturities ranging from overnight to 12 months.
Types of interest rates
15
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
EURIBOR
• The Euro interbank offered rate or EURIBOR, is the rate at which euro interbank depositsare offered between banks and is compiled by European Money Markets Institute (EMMI).
• The bank panels are determined using several criteria. Since these criteria differ between the EURIBOR and LIBOR, the rates also are not similar.
• LIBOR is mainly based on prime banks, whereas EURIBOR banks are banks with the highest volume of business in the Eurozone, which results in a panel with also Greek and Spanish banks. These panels are shown on the next slide.
Types of interest rates
16
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
LIBOR and EURIBOR banking panels
Types of interest rates
17
ICE EUR LIBOR panel EMMI EURIBOR panel
Lloyds TSB Bank plc Belfius Banque et Caisse d'Épargne de l'État
Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd BNP-Paribas ING Bank
Barclays Bank plc HSBC France Caixa Geral De Depósitos (CGD)
Mizuho Bank, Ltd. Natixis
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria - Banco
Santander
Citibank N.A. (London Branch) Crédit Agricole s.a. CECABANK
Coöperatieve Rabobank U.A.
Société Générale
Deutsche Bank CaixaBank S.A.
Credit Suisse AG (London Branch) DZ Bank Barclays
Royal Bank of Canada National Bank of Greece London Branch of JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.
HSBC Bank plc Intesa Sanpaolo
Santander UK Plc Monte dei Paschi di Siena
Deutsche Bank AG (London Branch) UniCredit
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. London Branch
Société Générale (London Branch)
The Royal Bank of Scotland plc
UBS AG
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
The Fed Funds Rate
• Unsecured interbank overnight rate of interest
• Allows banks to adjust the cash (i.e., reserves) on deposit with the Federal Reserve at the end of each day
• The effective fed funds rate is the average rate on brokered transactions
• The central bank may intervene with its own transactions to raise or lower the rate
Types of interest rates
18
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
EONIA
• The Euro OverNight Index Average or EONIA is the effective overnight reference rate for the euro. It is computed as a weighted average of all overnight unsecured lending transactions undertaken in the interbank market, initiated within the euro area by the contributing banks.
• EONIA is compiled with the help of the ECB with information from the same set of panel banks as for EURIBOR. But, whereas EURIBOR has different maturities, the EONIA is only for overnight.
Types of interest rates
19
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Repo rate
• Repurchase agreement is an agreement where a financial institution that owns securities agrees to sell them for X and buy them back in the future (usually the next day) for a slightly higher price, Y
• The financial institution obtains a loan.
• The rate of interest is calculated from the difference between X and Y and is known as the repo rate
Types of interest rates
20
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Interest rate swaps
Pre-crisis
21
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Notionals and market values
Amounts outstanding of OTC derivatives
22
Amounts outstanding notionals of over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives
Contract
types
Notional amount outstanding (billion USD) (Gross) market values (billion USD)
2012 2013 2014 2015 2012 2013 2014 2015
Foreign
exchange67,358 70,553 75,043 70,446 2,313 2,284 2,936 2,579
Interest
Rate492,605 584,799 505,431 384,025 19,038 14,200 15,586 10,148
Equity
linked6,251 6,560 6,968 7,141 600 700 612 495
CDS 25,068 21,020 16,399 12,294 848 653 593 421
Other 41,815 25,496 22,541 17,685 1,808 724 802 558
Total 635,685 710,633 628,251 492,911 24,953 18,825 20,847 14,498
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Nearly 60% of total value OTC derivative market consists of interest rate swaps
Types of interest rates
23
Amounts outstanding notionals of over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives
Contract
types
Notional amount outstanding (billion USD) (Gross) market values (billion USD)
2012 2013 2014 2015 2012 2013 2014 2015
Forward
rate
agreements
71,960 78,810 80,818 58,326 48 108 145 114
Swaps 372,293 456,725 381,129 288,634 17,285 12,919 13,925 8,993
Options 48,351 49,264 43,484 37,065 1,706 1,174 1,516 1,042
Total 492,605 584,799 505,431 384,025 19,038 14,200 15,586 10,148
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Hedging using an interest rate swap
Characteristics interest rate swaps
24
• An interest rate swap (IRS) is an agreement to exchange interest rate cash flows, calculated on a notional principal, at specified intervals (“settlement dates”) during the life of the agreement. Each party’s payment obligation is computed using a different interest rate.
• In the simplest and most common interest rate swap, a plain vanilla swap, typically refers to a generic interest rate swap in which one party pays a fixed rate and one party pays a floating rate.
Company
Bank B
Bank A
Fixed Ratex Notional Swap
Floating Ratex Notional Swap
Floating Ratex Notional Loan
LoanAgreement
IRS
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Trade, effective, termination and settlement dates
Interest rate swap
25
• The trade date is the date on which the parties agree the terms of a contract.
• The effective date is the date on which the parties begin calculating accrued obligations, such as fixed and floating interest payment obligations on an interest rate swap.
• The termination date (often called maturity date) is the date on which obligations no longer accrue and the final payment occurs.
• The term of a transaction lasts from the effective date to the termination date.
• The settlement date is the date at which the payments are made.
• The business day convention states how payments on non-business days are treated
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
OIS
Interest rate swap
26
• An Overnight Indexed Swap or OIS is an interest rate swap, where the floating rate is tied to a published overnight rate index. In the Eurozone this is EONIA, in the United States it is the Federal Funds rate.
• The floating rate cash flow is the interest accrued from the geometric average of the floating overnight index on the agreed upon notional.
• The accrual of the floating leg of the swap is identical to that of a strategy in which one borrows cash in the amount of the swap’s notional principal, invests in the overnight index rate and repeats the transaction, investing principal plus interest on an overnight basis
• The parties agree to exchange the difference between the fixed rate cash flow and the floating rate cash flow at the payment date.
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Determine the value of an interest rate swap
Pre-crisis valuation interest rate swap
27
Mark-to-market value interest rate swap
• The net present value of all (‘expected’) incoming and outgoing cash flows.
Forecasting curve
• Curve that is used to compute forward rates (which determine payments floating leg).
• Forward rates are needed since we don’t know what the floating rate will be, say, 2 years form now.
• The curve is constructed according to tenor of the floating leg.
Discounting curve
• Curve that is used to discount the future cash flows.
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Bootstrapping
Valuation interest rate swap
28
• The cash rates, FRA rates and swap rates are par rates, these need to be converted to zero rates.
• Zero rates are rates for which the interest and principal payments are made at maturity of the instrument, hence no intermediate payments.
• At the short end of the curve, some instruments have a par rate that equals the zero rate, in this case the instrument makes no intermediate payments.
• Bootstrapping is this process of converting the par rates into zero rates.
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Small spreads and limited spread volatility (EUR swap curves, January 4, 2007)
Market developments
29
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
1Y 2Y 3Y 4Y 5Y 6Y 7Y 8Y 9Y 10Y11Y12Y15Y20Y25Y30Y35Y40Y45Y50Y
S45 Euro Swaps Curve S201 Euro (vs. 3M Euribor) Curve
S232 Euro (vs. 1M Euribor) Swap Curve S133 Eonia Curve
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Pre-crisis – traditional – single-curve valuation of IRS
Valuation interest rate swap
30
Single curve approach
1. Define the set of vanilla instruments (cash rates, future/forward rates, swap rates) and algorithms to be used to construct ‘the swap curve’.
2. Calculate the discount factors from ‘the swap curve’ derived in step 1.
3. Calculate the forward rates using the discount factors derived in step 2.
4. Calculate the expected cash flows of the swap contract under the assumption that the floating rates equal the forward rates calculated in step 3.
5. Calculate the value of the swap contract by discounting the swap cash flows derived in step 4 using the discount factors derived in step 2.
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Interest rate swaps
Post-crisis
31
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
The crisis
Valuation interest rate swap
32
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Small spreads and limited spread volatility (EUR swap curves, January 4, 2007)
Market developments
33
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
1Y 2Y 3Y 4Y 5Y 6Y 7Y 8Y 9Y 10Y11Y12Y15Y20Y25Y30Y35Y40Y45Y50Y
S45 Euro Swaps Curve S201 Euro (vs. 3M Euribor) Curve
S232 Euro (vs. 1M Euribor) Swap Curve S133 Eonia Curve
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
The day Lehman collapsed (EUR swap curves, September 15, 2008)
Market developments
34
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
1W 1M 3M 5M 7M 9M 11M15M21M30M 4Y 6Y 8Y 10Y 12Y 20Y 30Y 40Y 50Y
S232 Euro (vs. 1M Euribor) Swap Curve S201 Euro (vs 3M Euribor) Curve
S45 Euro Swaps Curve S133 Eonia Curve
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
The (confidence) crisis
Market developments
35
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
Mar-05 Jul-06 Dec-07 Apr-09 Sep-10 Jan-12 May-13 Oct-14 Feb-16
EURIBOR 3M minus EONIA 3M
BNP Paribas announces credit
difficulties, suspends
redemptions from three
money market funds, because of
valuation difficulties in
subprime assets.(August 8, 2007)
Collapse of Lehman Brothers(September 15, 2008)
Moody’s downgrades Portugal by 4 notches from Baa1 to junk status Ba2
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
The (confidence) crisis
Market developments
36
0.0%
0.1%
0.2%
0.3%
0.4%
0.5%
0.6%
0.7%
Mar-05 Jul-06 Dec-07 Apr-09 Sep-10 Jan-12 May-13 Oct-14 Feb-16
10Y EUR SWAP minus 10Y EONIA
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Cross-currency basis spreads between EUR and USD
Market developments
37
-0.6%
-0.5%
-0.4%
-0.3%
-0.2%
-0.1%
0.0%
0.1%
Nov-04 Nov-06 Dec-08 Jan-11 Jan-13 Feb-15 Mar-17
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Current market (EUR swap curve)
Market developments
38
-0.6%
-0.4%
-0.2%
0.0%
0.2%
0.4%
0.6%
0.8%
1.0%
1.2%
1.4%
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
S45 Euro Swaps Curve S201 Euro (vs. 3M Euribor) Curve
S232 Euro (vs. 1M Euribor Swap Curve) S133 EONIA Curve
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Multicurve approach with cash collateral earning the overnight rate
Post-crisis – current – valuation of IRS
39
1. Define the set of instruments and algorithms to be used to construct the swap curve (tenor curve).
2. Define the set of instruments and algorithms to be used to construct the OIS curve (discounting curve).
3. Calculate the discount factors from the OIS curve derived in step 2.
4. Calculate forward rates using the swap (tenor) curve from step 1 using the discount factors derived in step 3.
5. Calculate the expected cash flows of the swap contract under the assumption that the floating rates equal the forward rates calculated in step 4.
6. Calculate the value of the swap contract by discounting the swap cash flows derived in step 5 using the discount factors derived in step 3.
Please note: The cash flows in step 6 are discounted using ‘OIS’ discount factors as the collateral is assumed to earn the overnight rate. The collateral agreement determines the discount factors to be used for discounting the ‘expected’ cash flows in step 6.
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Summary swap pricing
40Insert your footer here
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Value adjustments
41
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Or the price?
The value of a derivative
42
“What is the difference between the price and the value of a derivative?”
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Mark-to-market value
43
“True or false: the value of a derivative equals the mark-to-marketvalue of the derivative.”
“True or false: the value of a derivative equals the accounting value of the derivative.”
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
XVAs
Other valuation drivers
44
Pre-crisis valuation
Tenor curve
Post-crisis valuation
Tenor curve Overnight
Index Swap
(OIS) curve
Credit Value
Adjustment
(CVA)
Funding
Benefit
Adjustment
(FBA)
Collateral
implied
curve
Debt Value
Adjustment
(DVA)
Funding
Cost
Adjustment
(FCA)
Replacemen
t Value
Adjustment
(RVA).
Collateral
Value
Adjustment
(ColVA).
Capital
Value
Adjustment
(KVA).
Margin
Value
Adjustment
(MVA).
Break
clauses
(termination
amount)
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Recent developments
• Several years ago, major dealers started to centralize the management and hedging of their derivatives valuation adjustments with dedicated XVA desks, introducing 'XVA optimization‘.
• Dealers earn millions by transferring client trades through novations to other parties with different risk offsets, funding costs, regulatory capital regimes or credit spreads.
• XVAs play a large role in the costs of derivative trading. Parties who neglect the impact on their books are losing out…
Impact XVA’s on use derivatives
45
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Credit Valuation Adjustment (CVA)
Counterparty credit risk (CCR)
46
IFRS 13 states that the likelihood of counterparty default must be included in assessing hedge effectiveness: CVA and DVA.
CVA and DVA are applicable for uncollateralized swaps.
Credit Valuation Adjustment (CVA)
• CVA represents the difference in value between a completely risk-free value and a value that takes the possibility of counterparty default into account.
• It can be defined as the present value of expected loss due to counterparty default.
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Credit Valuation Adjustment (CVA)
Counterparty credit risk (CCR)
47
CVA is calculated by taking the expected positive exposure (EPE) and multiplying this by the counterparty’s default rate (PD) and the loss given default (LGD):
• E.g. Interest rate swaps exchange multiple cashflows
𝐶𝑉𝐴 = 1 − 𝑅 ×
𝑡=0
𝑇
𝐷 𝑡 ∗ 𝐸𝑃𝐸 𝑡 ∗ 𝑃𝐷(𝑡)
Recovery Rate. (1 – R) = LGD
Probability of Default
Discounted Expected Exposure
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Debt Value Adjustment (DVA)
Counterparty credit risk (CCR)
48
Debit Valuation Adjustment (DVA)
• The DVA represents the difference in value between a completely risk-free value and a value that takes the possibility of a party’s own default into account (the entity’s own credit risk).
• Conversely to CVA, the DVA is the present value of counterparty’s expected loss due to our default. In other words, DVA is CVA seen from counterparty’s perspective.
• The inclusion of DVA in pricing is seen as somewhat necessary to allow for pricing symmetry.
• Accounting standards require it, whereas regulation does not recognize it.
Market value swap = Risk-free value swap – CVA + DVA
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
DVA
Debit value adjustment calculation
49
“How is this possible?”
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
DVA
Debit value adjustment calculation
50
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Pricing in the presence of collateral agreements
51
• It is becoming increasingly common for transactions to be collateralizedin OTC markets
• Derivative transactions are regulated by an ISDA Master agreement with sometimes a credit support annex (CSA)
• The CSA regulates credit support for derivative transactions:
− Terms governing acceptable collateral focus on credit protection, but also fix cash reference rates and haircuts on other assets.
For example:
• Consider transactions between companies A and B
• The CSA might require A to post collateral with B equal to the value to B of its outstanding transactions with B when this value is positive for B.
• If A defaults, B is entitled to take possession of the collateral
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Pricing in the presence of collateral agreements
52
• Margin requirements (variation margin, initial margin, etcetera)
• Minimum transfer amount & type of collateral (incl. haircuts)
• Re-hypothecation, substitution, owner of return of collateral
• Frequency collateral calculations & margin calls
• Break clauses
• Market risks associated with (non-cash) collateral and derivatives
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Funding value adjustment (FVA)
• Funding costs/benefits should be taken into account when collateralized derivative transactions are valued. This results in the Funding Value Adjustment (FVA).
• When a dealer is in-the-money on a trade, it receives collateral from its collateralized hedge counterparty, and if the collateral is assumed to be rehypothecable, the dealer should be able to lend that collateral to its treasury, which is a funding benefit. The results in the Funding Benefit Adjustment (FBA).
• When a dealer is out-of-the-money on a trade, it has to post collateral to its collateralized hedge counterparty, and would therefore need to borrow money from its internal treasury, which is a funding cost. The results in the Funding Cost Adjustment (FCA).
FVA = FBA – FCA
Funding costs/benefits
53
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Impact of a derivative trade on capital requirements
Banks are required to hold three different types of capital under Basel III (CRD IV, CRR) for the risk of a derivative trade:
Market risk
Capital against market movements (i.e. interest rate risk capital for an interest rate swap) that change the market value of the derivative. This results in market risk capital in the trading book or the banking book
Counterparty credit risk
Capital for the risk that the client defaults and (part of) the current market value of the derivative is lost.
Credit value adjustment
Capital for the risk that the credit quality (e.g. credit rating, credit spread) of the client changes.
This results in value adjustments for the bank, the capital value adjustment (KVA).
This means that banks start pricing capital costs – KVA – into their derivatives trades.
Capital value adjustment (KVA)
54
0 1
0 2
0 3
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Central clearing
55
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Introduction
• A clearing house acts as an intermediary in futures transactions.
• It guarantees the performance of the parties to each transaction.
• The clearing house has a number of members.
• Brokers who are not members must channel their business through a member.
• The main task of the clearing house is to keep track of all the transaction that take place during a day, so that it an calculate the net position of each of its members.
Clearing houses
56
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Margin account
Margin
• A margin is cash or marketable securities deposited by an investor with his or her broker.
• Margins minimize the possibility of a loss through a default on a contract.
Margin Account
• Investors maintain a margin account with a broker.
• Brokers maintain a margin account with a clearinghouse member.
• Clearinghouse members maintain a margin account with the clearing house.
• The balance in the margin account is adjusted to reflect daily settlement.
Margins
57
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Initial, maintenance margin and variation margin
• Initial margin is the buffer applied in addition to the variation margin to cover unexpected losses that may occur during the close-out process in the case of a counterparty's default.
• Initial margin can often be in non cash collateral with a haircut applied.
• A trader has to bring the balance in the margin account up to the initial margin when it falls below the maintenance margin level.
• A clearing member of the exchange clearing house only has an initial margin and is required to bring the balance in its account up to that level every day. These daily margin cash flows are referred to as variation margin.
• A clearing member is also required to contribute to a default fund.
Margins
58
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Central counterparty
• A central counterparty (CCP) is like an exchange clearing house.
− It stands between two parties to the derivative transaction so that one party does not have to bear the risk that the other party will default.
• Like members of an exchange clearing house, the members of a CCP provide initial margin, daily variation margin, and contributions to the default fund.
Clearing houses in OTC markets
59
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
From a bilateral model to the CCP model…
• Traditionally most transactions have been cleared bilaterally in OTC markets: each market participant has a legal relationship with, and separate (gross) exposure to each of the other participants, creating a tangled web of exposures.
Central counterparty
60
A
F
B C
D
E
Weaknesses exhibited during the crisis
Counterparty credit risk
Possible systemic implications
that a default or fear of a default
can have due to the
interconnected web of market
participants.
Weak risk management
especially for bespoke
transactions, led to realised
losses in times of market stress.
Lack of transparency
Regulators did not have
sufficient oversight of global
positions to detect the
accumulation of pockets of risk
within the financial system.
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
From a bilateral model to the CCP model…
• Each market participant has a legal relationship with and (gross) exposure to the CCP only, regardless of the identity of their counterparty in the underlying trade.
Central counterparty
61
Regulatory response
• All standardised derivatives should be centrally cleared.
• Non centrally cleared derivatives should be bilaterally collateralised and subject to higher capital requirements.
• All OTC derivatives should be reported to a TR.
• All standardised and sufficiently liquid OTC derivatives should be traded on an exchange or electronic trading platform.
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
CCP
“How would you calculate initial margin requirements?”
“TRUE OR FALSE: Different CCPs may charge different initial margins for similar trades”
“What impact would initial margin have on capital requirements?”
Discussion
62
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
MVA
• Posting initial margin has to be funded.
• Initial margin received can in most cases not be re-hypothecated.
• Hence, there are no funding advantages from initial margin requirements. This results in an important funding cost: the Margin Valuation Adjustment (MVA).
“Initial margin requirements reduce credit risk, but what type of risk does it introduce?”
Margin valuation adjustment
63
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands
Conclusion
Impact XVA’s on use derivatives
64
• Cost of trading derivatives has implications for the valuation.
Value = MtM - CVA + DVA + FVA - KVA - MVA + … + …
• MtM = Mark-to-market value
• CVA/DVA = Credit Value Adjustment / Debit Value Adjustment
• FVA = Funding Value Adjustment
• KVA = Capital Value Adjustment
• MVA = Margin Value Adjustment
“What cross-relations do you observe for the value adjustments above?”
Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, a UK private company limited by guarantee (“DTTL”), its network of member firms, and their relatedentities. DTTL and each of its member firms are legally separate and independent entities. DTTL (also referred to as “Deloitte Global”) does not provide services to clients.Please see www.deloitte.nl/about for a more detailed description of DTTL and its member firms.
Deloitte provides audit, consulting, financial advisory, risk management, tax and related services to public and private clients spanning multiple industries. Deloitte serves fourout of five Fortune Global 500® companies through a globally connected network of member firms in more than 150 countries bringing world-class capabilities, insights, andhigh-quality service to address clients’ most complex business challenges. To learn more about how Deloitte’s approximately 225,000 professionals make an impact thatmatters, please connect with us on Facebook, LinkedIn, or Twitter.
This communication contains general information only, and none of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, its member firms, or their related entities (collectively, the “DeloitteNetwork”) is, by means of this communication, rendering professional advice or services. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your finances or yourbusiness, you should consult a qualified professional adviser. No entity in the Deloitte Network shall be responsible for any loss whatsoever sustained by any person who relieson this communication.
© 2017 Deloitte The Netherlands