Upload
rahul-yadav
View
18
Download
6
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
AEROSPACE
Citation preview
DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF DC POWER SUPPLY (28 V) FOR
AEROSPACE APPLICATION
V. Jayashree Shivkumar, R. Periasundaram
#, M.Vadivel
#
Scientist ‘E’,
#T O ‘B’, Aircraft Projects Division, LCA, CVRDE, Avadi, Chennai – 600054.
#Project Associate, Electrical Department, IIT Madras, Chennai- 600036
Abstract: The present day trend in efficient power
generation is to use Permanent Magnet Generator for
Aircraft Applications. The technology used in the
military / aircraft applications for power generation
comprises three-stages / two stages generator
configuration. The advantages of Permanent Magnet
Generator over conventional generators are discussed
in this paper. Since the rotor excitation winding has
been replaced by Permanent Magnets, the efficiency of
the generator has improved as the copper losses in the
rotor has been eliminated.
A 1 kW Permanent Magnet Generator using rare earth
permanent magnet has been designed, developed,
extensively analyzed for its performance parameters.
This promising technology can overcome the problems
in a constant speed machine in terms of power
requirement, reliability, ease of maintenance and
higher operating speed and temperatures. Keywords: Brushless Permanent Magnet Generator,
and VSCV concept.
I. INTRODUCTION
The Electrical generators can be classified as brush
type and brushless type. The advantages and
disadvantages of both the types of generation is
detailed below.
Advantages of brushed scheme
•Simple and conventional
•Cost effective
Disadvantages
•Maintenance
•Ageing
•Reliability
•Power loss
Advantages of Brushless generator
•Good power density
•Reduced size
•No EMI/EMC interferences
Disadvantages:
•No Excitation control
•De-magnetizing effects
In-view of the lower weight and size and due to low
EMI/EMC interference, it is decided to select
permanent magnet brushless generators for the design
of Aerospace Applications.
A comparison table on the different types Generators
is shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Comparison of Different Types of
Generators
Induction
Generator
Surface
Mounted
Permanent
Magnet
(SPM)
Generator
Interior
Permanent
Magnet
(IPM)
Generator
Cubic Volume 1.0 0.7 0.7
Efficiency 1.0 1.05 1.05
Power factor 1.0 1.0 1.2
Constant Power
range 1.0 0.2 0.8
Max. Rotor
surface speed 1.0 0.3 0.6
* The values are based on relative index
with respect to Induction generator.
Permanent magnet synchronous machines
have found wide applications in various fields.
Compared to other electrical machines, PM machines
combine the advantages of induction machines and
common synchronous machines in high efficiency,
power factor and power density, low size and weight.
Various types of permanent magnets like
Alnico, ferrites, Samarium cobalt and NdFeB are
available. After exploring the B-H characteristics of
all these permanent magnets it is decided to choose
NdFeB PM magnets for the design of generator. The
choice of permanent magnets calls for high residual
flux density with high MMF to demagnetize the
magnets.
2
Typical range of NdFeB grades is shown in
Fig.1,
Fig.1. Typical Range of NdFeB Grades
For our application other essential factors
like very high overload-factor and the maximal
permitted short-circuit current without permanent
demagnetization of the magnets, had to be
considered.
II. PROTOTYPE DESIGN
A 1 kW PERMANENT MAGNET
SYNCHRONOUS MACHINE is designed and
developed using NdFeB as permanent magnets. The
SURFACE MOUNTED PERMANENT MAGNET
on rotor is designed and built to prove the new
technology concepts in the optimized configurations.
A shielding cylinder surrounding the magnets on
rotor protects the magnets against centrifugal forces.
The ratings of the 1 kW generator are as follows
Power output : 1 kW
Input Speed : 200 RPM to 900 RPM
The generator laminations are cobalt iron
Vanadium featuring very good magnetic and
mechanical strength. It is a 12-pole machine with 36
slots .The machine is designed to generate 28V.dc. It
caters maximum torque near the rated speed. The
geometry and the number of poles are fixed. The
design of the generator is obtained from the
conventional fundamental equations for the given
output ratings. The variable voltage derived as a
function of speed is rectified and converted to a
constant 28VDC voltage (VSCV) for variable load
and speed conditions using MOSFET power switches
with PWM concepts.
The generator design parameters are listed below
Table 2. Input data of 1 kW Generator
Parameters Value
Power Factor, pf 0.8
Speed, N (rpm) 775
Stacking Factor, stf 0.96
Slot Filling Factor, Ks 0.5
Short Pitching (Slot) 1
Magnet MQ3G32SH
No of Poles, P 12
No of Slots/pole/phase, q 1
Stator Outer Dia, ods (mm) 145
Rotor Outer Dia, odr (mm) 83.5
Machine Length, Lc (mm) 114
Magnet Length, lm (mm) 8
Slot Depth, Sh (mm) 18.5
Tooth Width, Wts (mm) 4
Core Depth, dcs (mm) 13.5
No. of Turns per Coil 7
No. of Coils per Phase 12
Current Density, J (A/Sq.mm) 5
III. SIMULATION ANALYSIS
A powerful Electro-Magnetic Simulation
package was used for design analysis and
performance validation at no load and full load at
transient conditions. To make the model suitable to
optimize the machine design, all the parameters are
calculated from the dimensions and material
properties of the machine. The simulation data
ensures that there is less armature reaction in the
machine. For an optimum design, Ampere-turns
spent by magnet should be approximately equal to
the Ampere-turns spent by stator core teeth and
airgap. Using the simulation packages the flux
density at various critical parts of the generator is
derived. The no load flux density of the magnet is
shown in Fig. 2.
3
Fig. 2. No Load Flux Density in Magnet
The simulation test results are given in table 3. The
results confirm that the performance requirements of
the Generator will be met.
Table 3. Output data of 1Kw generator
Quantities Simulation
program
Voltage, V (Volts) 72.155 (VL)
Current, I (Amps) 15 (IL)
Output Power, Pout (Watts) 1248.3
Efficiency, Eff 0.9117
Fig. 3. Single stage PM Generator
IV. PROTOTYPE PERFORMANCE VALIDATION
Various load tests have been carried out on the
generator, which is shown in fig3. The Test Data is
matching with simulation data analysis and it is
tabulated in table 4. Various Performance tests like
open circuit, load tests and efficiency analysis have
been conducted and the test validation is matching
with the simulation data and the performance graphs
are shown in Figs.4, 5, 6, 7 & 8.
Table 4. Test data matching with simulation data
Quantities Test data Simulation
program
Voltage, V (Volts) 82.9 (VL) 72.155
Current, I (Amps) 13.6933 (IPh) 15 (IL)
Output Power,
(Watts)
1121 1248.3
Efficiency, Eff 80% to 90% 0.9117
Fig. 4. Open Circuit Characteristics
4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Output Power (in Watts)
Eff
icie
ncy
(in
%)
Speed ~ 800 RPM
Fig. 5. Load Graph at 800 RPM
Fig. 6. Speed Vs Power
Fig. 7. Volt Ampere Characteristics at Different
Speeds
Fig. 8. PM Generator efficiency
V. THERMAL ENVELOPE
(a) The temperature study was carried out to
determine the temperature rise on various parts
of the generator and to evaluate the magnet
characteristics with increased temperatures.
The resistances (cold) of the winding at ambient
temperature are:
Rr = 0.387 ohms
Rb = 0.384 ohms
Ry = 0.381 ohms
Ambient Temperature, T1 = 30 oC
After noting the initial values, the machine is
loaded fully and is run for nearly Two hours. As
the machine reaches a steady temperature of
60oC and it is switched off.
The readings are shown below.
Table 5. Heat run Test data Time Resistance Time
(1 Hour +)
Resistance Time
(2 Hour +)
Resistance
(Minutes) (Ohms) (Minutes) (Ohms) (Minutes) (Ohms)
10 0.421 10 0.411 10 0.406
20 0.422 20 0.410 20 0.405
30 0.417 30 0.410 30 0.404
40 0.413 40 0.409 40 0.403
50 0.412 50 0.407 50 0.403
60 0.411 60 0.406 60 0.401
5
The resistance of the hot wire is raised upto a
value of 0.422ohms and after 2 hours it started to
decay exponentially.
(b) There could be about 60 % increase in
the value of current density by increasing the
Power output to nearly 1.6 kW from the design
value of 1.0 kW. As the temperature rise is well
with in limits of the insulation there is no
requirement to increase the insulation level.
INFERENCES
[A] A feasibility study has been carried in the field,
variable speed constant voltage operation in
single stage configuration.
[B] The generator shall be loaded upto 1.5 kW. For 5
minutes.
[C] The design of insulation system is compact.
[D] Max. temperature rise is 27°C.
FUTURE SCOPE OF WORK
Based on the simulation and test results, the research
work can be further extended to 5 kW power
requirements at high-speed operation in single stage.
This in turn results in a more compact configuration
for airborne requirement.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We wish to express our gratitude to Dr. D.
Hanumanna, Outstanding Scientist and Director
CVRDE, Avadi, Shri. S. Sundaresh, Sct. ‘G’,
Additional Director (Technology), Prof. G. Sridhara
Rao, EEE, IITM, Shri. C. Chandrasekaran, PD-AP
and Prof. P. Sasidhara Rao, EEE, IITM for the
constant guidance and immense support for doing
this project in CVRDE.
REFERENCES
[1] Electrical Machine Design – A. K. Sawhney.
[2] Brushless Permanent Magnet and Reluctance
Motors Drives – T. J. E. Miller.
[3] Performance and Design of AC Machines –
M. G. Say.
[4] Electric Motor Drives – R. Krishnan,
Virginia Tech, Prentice Hall of India, 2002.
[5] Design and Analysis of 42V Permanent
Magnet Generator for Automotive
Applications’, Ali Keyhani, IEEE Trans on
Energy Conversion, March 2003.