1
Objective metrics included volume leaked after saline perfusion (leak) and time to complete the anastomosis. Penalty points were assigned for broken sutures, air knots, locking sutures and failure to maintain an outside-in to inside-out technique. Leak, time and pen- alties before and after training were compared. RESULTS: Mean leak for the novice group was 70.4mL 13.7 and mean completion time was 18.7 3 minutes versus 45.3mL 10.6 (p.01) and 8.51 minutes (p.001) respectively for the expert group. Post-training (proficient group), there was significant im- provement in resident leak (46.7mL6.8; p.001) and time (14.43; p.01). Leak was similar between the proficient and ex- pert groups (46.7 mL 6.8 vs. 45.3 mL 10.6 respectively; p.77); however, there remained a significant difference for time (14.43.0 vs 8.51 minutes respectively; p0.01). Mean total penalties for the novice group was (84.519.7) compared to zero penalties for the proficient and expert groups. CONCLUSIONS: We report a low cost workshop for teaching sur- gical residents the basic skills of performing vascular anastomosis. A simple, objective scoring system is described that can differentiate between a novice, a person who is proficient and an expert at per- forming vascular anastomosis. Kirkpatrick evaluation of interprofessional simulation-based education for peroperative crisis resource management Bharat Sharma BSc, MD, Sylvain Boet MD, MEd, Dylan Bould MB, ChB, MEd, Ariza Birze MSc, PhD, Viren Naik MD, MEd, FRCPC, Scott Reeves PhD, Teodor Grantcharov MD, PhD University of Toronto, Toronto, ON INTRODUCTION: Crisis management is acknowledged as key to ensuring patient safety in operating room (OR) practice. Interpro- fessional education aims to teach different professions how to work effectively together. In interprofessional simulation-based education (IPSE), debriefing can be challenging, as participants may feel shy and intimidated about reflecting upon their performance in front of peers from other professions. This study aims to evaluate IPSE crisis resource management training according to the Kirkpatrick model. METHODS: Teams consisting of one anesthesia resident/fellow, one surgical resident/fellow and one circulating OR nurse, underwent 2 different simulated scenarios with one video-assisted, expert instructor-lead team debriefing in between. The crisis scenarios used a hybrid simulation, combining a virtual reality laparoscopic trainer and a high-fidelity computer enhanced mannikin in a realistic oper- ating room environment. Immediately after the session participants evaluated the program using an anonymous questionnaire, rating their experience. The questionnaire approached level 1 (Learners’ views on the learning experience) and 2a (modification of attitudes and perceptions) according to the modified Kirkpatrick model. RESULTS: Eighteen teams (54 individuals) each participated in two scenarios and one expert instructor-lead debriefing for a total of 36 scenarios and 18 debriefings. All participants, but one nurse, evaluated the training session. CONCLUSIONS: IPSE for peroperative crisis resource manage- ment training was feasible and very well received by the 3 professions. Expert instructor-lead team debriefing didn’t appear to be a barrier to the implementation of routine IPSE crisis resource management training. Further studies should investigate the impact of such pro- grams on higher Kirkpatrick levels. Design and validation of a model for assessment of procedural skills in open surgery Neil Rittenhouse MHSc, BASc, Bharat Sharma MD, Ranil Sonnadara PhD, Alex Mihailidis PhD, PEng, Teodor Grantcharov MD, PhD University of Toronto, Toronto, ON INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopy is currently the gold standard for cholecystectomy. Recent literature suggests surgical trainees have limited exposure to open cholecystectomy which may result in sub- optimal performance in the event of conversion. Furthermore, most training and assessment models are designed for laparoscopic chole- cystectomy with limited opportunities for open simulator training. The present study’s purpose was to design an inexpensive model for open cholecystectomy and validate a performance assessment tool. METHODS: The simulator is comprised of a porcine liver and gall- bladder in a mock human abdomen with silicon skin. The assessment tool utilizes inexpensive IR cameras to provide tracking of participant hand motions.Ten novice general surgery trainees (20 cholecystec- tomies) and five expert surgeons (> 100 cholecystectomies) com- pleted an open cholecystectomy using the simulator. Procedures were recorded and assessed by a blinded evaluator using a global rating scale.Tracking data analysis was based on number of movements and total path length. RESULTS: Novices (t36.18 min) completed the procedure sig- nificantly slower than experts (t19.53 min) (Mann-Whitney’s test U20, p0.05) and had significantly more hand movements (Mann-Whitney’s test U20, p0.05). Analysis of the total global rating scale scores showed a significant difference between novice (14/35) and expert (24/35) performance in all categories (Mann- Whitney’s test U58, p0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The present model presents a realistic, low-cost tool for training and assessment of procedural skills in open chole- cystectomy. The study demonstrated the validity of the IR tracking device as an objective assessment tool for open surgical skills training. Future training should incorporate this low-cost, highly effective training device into surgical curricula. Intraoperative resident education for robotic laparoscopic gastric banding surgery Daniel A Hashimoto, Ernest Gomez, Paula K Edelson, Enrico Danzer MD, Jon B Morris MD, FACS, Noel N Williams MD, FRCSI, Kristoffel R Dumon MD, FACS University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA INTRODUCTION: The incorporation of robotic surgery into resi- dent education poses questions regarding the impact on intra- S129 Vol. 213, No. 3S, September 2011 Surgical Forum Abstracts

Design and validation of a model for assessment of procedural skills in open surgery

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

m

hvnp

Cgsbf

KsrBDVTU

Iefe(apr

Ms2iaaaetva

Rt3e

CmEttg

DpNRTU

IclotcTo

Mbthtprst

RnU(r(W

CtcdFt

IgDENU

I

S129Vol. 213, No. 3S, September 2011 Surgical Forum Abstracts

Objective metrics included volume leaked after saline perfusion(leak) and time to complete the anastomosis. Penalty points wereassigned for broken sutures, air knots, locking sutures and failure tomaintain an outside-in to inside-out technique. Leak, time and pen-alties before and after training were compared.

RESULTS: Mean leak for the novice group was 70.4mL �13.7 andean completion time was 18.7 �3 minutes versus 45.3mL �10.6

(p�.01) and 8.5�1 minutes (p�.001) respectively for the expertgroup. Post-training (proficient group), there was significant im-provement in resident leak (46.7mL�6.8; p�.001) and time(14.4�3; p�.01). Leak was similar between the proficient and ex-pert groups (46.7 mL �6.8 vs. 45.3 mL �10.6 respectively; p�.77);

owever, there remained a significant difference for time (14.4�3.0s 8.5�1 minutes respectively; p�0.01). Mean total penalties for theovice group was (84.5�19.7) compared to zero penalties for theroficient and expert groups.

ONCLUSIONS: We report a low cost workshop for teaching sur-ical residents the basic skills of performing vascular anastomosis. Aimple, objective scoring system is described that can differentiateetween a novice, a person who is proficient and an expert at per-orming vascular anastomosis.

irkpatrick evaluation of interprofessionalimulation-based education for peroperative crisisesource managementharat Sharma BSc, MD, Sylvain Boet MD, MEd,ylan Bould MB, ChB, MEd, Ariza Birze MSc, PhD,iren Naik MD, MEd, FRCPC, Scott Reeves PhD,eodor Grantcharov MD, PhDniversity of Toronto, Toronto, ON

NTRODUCTION: Crisis management is acknowledged as key tonsuring patient safety in operating room (OR) practice. Interpro-essional education aims to teach different professions how to workffectively together. In interprofessional simulation-based educationIPSE), debriefing can be challenging, as participants may feel shynd intimidated about reflecting upon their performance in front ofeers from other professions. This study aims to evaluate IPSE crisisesource management training according to the Kirkpatrick model.

ETHODS: Teams consisting of one anesthesia resident/fellow, oneurgical resident/fellow and one circulating OR nurse, underwent

different simulated scenarios with one video-assisted, expertnstructor-lead team debriefing in between. The crisis scenarios usedhybrid simulation, combining a virtual reality laparoscopic trainernd a high-fidelity computer enhanced mannikin in a realistic oper-ting room environment. Immediately after the session participantsvaluated the program using an anonymous questionnaire, ratingheir experience. The questionnaire approached level 1 (Learners’iews on the learning experience) and 2a (modification of attitudesnd perceptions) according to the modified Kirkpatrick model.

ESULTS: Eighteen teams (54 individuals) each participated inwo scenarios and one expert instructor-lead debriefing for a total of6 scenarios and 18 debriefings. All participants, but one nurse,

valuated the training session. d

ONCLUSIONS: IPSE for peroperative crisis resource manage-ent training was feasible and very well received by the 3 professions.xpert instructor-lead team debriefing didn’t appear to be a barrier to

he implementation of routine IPSE crisis resource managementraining. Further studies should investigate the impact of such pro-rams on higher Kirkpatrick levels.

esign and validation of a model for assessment ofrocedural skills in open surgeryeil Rittenhouse MHSc, BASc, Bharat Sharma MD,anil Sonnadara PhD, Alex Mihailidis PhD, PEng,eodor Grantcharov MD, PhDniversity of Toronto, Toronto, ON

NTRODUCTION: Laparoscopy is currently the gold standard forholecystectomy. Recent literature suggests surgical trainees haveimited exposure to open cholecystectomy which may result in sub-ptimal performance in the event of conversion. Furthermore, mostraining and assessment models are designed for laparoscopic chole-ystectomy with limited opportunities for open simulator training.he present study’s purpose was to design an inexpensive model forpen cholecystectomy and validate a performance assessment tool.

ETHODS: The simulator is comprised of a porcine liver and gall-ladder in a mock human abdomen with silicon skin. The assessmentool utilizes inexpensive IR cameras to provide tracking of participantand motions. Ten novice general surgery trainees (�20 cholecystec-omies) and five expert surgeons (> 100 cholecystectomies) com-leted an open cholecystectomy using the simulator. Procedures wereecorded and assessed by a blinded evaluator using a global ratingcale. Tracking data analysis was based on number of movements andotal path length.

ESULTS: Novices (t�36.18 min) completed the procedure sig-ificantly slower than experts (t�19.53 min) (Mann-Whitney’s test�20, p�0.05) and had significantly more hand movements

Mann-Whitney’s test U�20, p�0.05). Analysis of the total globalating scale scores showed a significant difference between novice14/35) and expert (24/35) performance in all categories (Mann-

hitney’s test U�58, p�0.05).

ONCLUSIONS: The present model presents a realistic, low-costool for training and assessment of procedural skills in open chole-ystectomy. The study demonstrated the validity of the IR trackingevice as an objective assessment tool for open surgical skills training.uture training should incorporate this low-cost, highly effectiveraining device into surgical curricula.

ntraoperative resident education for robotic laparoscopicastric banding surgeryaniel A Hashimoto, Ernest Gomez, Paula K Edelson,nrico Danzer MD, Jon B Morris MD, FACS,oel N Williams MD, FRCSI, Kristoffel R Dumon MD, FACSniversity of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA

NTRODUCTION: The incorporation of robotic surgery into resi-

ent education poses questions regarding the impact on intra-