Upload
dangcong
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Design Challenges for Biosynthetics in Space
Jackson LeeASEN 5519 Payload Design
12/9/03
Engineered PHB in cressleafhttp://www.firstscience.com/site/articles/sykes.asp
PHB poly-b-hydroxybutyratehttp://wine1.sb.fsu.edu/bch5425/lect09/lect09.htm
Why Plastics in Space?In space, packaging can account for up to 40% dry weight of food. Advances will reduce this, but large amounts of plastic waste remain1.No current ability to produce petroleum based plastics on a mars/ lunar base, so no plastic bags, no containers, bottles, etc.No current ability to process plastic wastesLong duration missions (10 year+)
BiosyntheticsPlastics, proteins, biopolymers produced as a natural part of biological function or by genetic modification and are generally biodegradable7.• Insulin, ethyl alcohol, fabrics, Bt, sutures
Plastics (Many forms)• Certain biopolymers are produced that are currently on
the market as “envi-friendly” plastic substitutes (Nodax, Biopol7)
• Natural byproduct of starches by bacteria. Carbon/ energy storage, biofilm formation2,3.
PHB PHA
How do we do it?How do you provide biodegradable plastics on a mars/ lunar base? Microbes or plants
R. Sphaeroides, a commonly studied bacterium
Cressleaf with engineered chloroplasts to produce PHA vacuoles
Differentiated cellsundifferentiated
Encapsulated vacuolesExtracellular secretion
Gene insertion and expression difficult
Simpler genetic manipulation
Difficult to monitorDifficult to quantify2
GreenhouseLarge bioreactors
Hormone sensitive5Easily poisoned or soured2
Control parameters:Light, pH, T, gas composition, nutrients (N/P)5
Wastes: CO2
Control parameters:pH, T, salts, C/N/P2
Wastes: nasty stuff
Lignified cell wallPeptidoglycan wall2
Slower growth (days, months)5
Rapid growth, (minutes)4
PlantsBacteria
This sucks!• How can we combine the few advantages of
each to make a better “bio-bioreactor”?• In nature, many internal bacterial-plant
symbiosis exists. The plant provides a controlled environment, the bacteria provides a function the plant is unable to do.8
• Can we use this to make plants host bacteria we want and have the bacteria produce things for us?
Examples
Rhizobiumhttp://www.science.uwaterloo.ca/~tcharles/rhizobium.html
Mycorrhizalhttp://www.ecol.kvl.dk/~sto/gf/orglist.htm
AdvantagesIf nodule forming bacteria can be coaxed into forming PHAs or PHBs, they can be harvested and processed into biodegradable plastic products on a mars/lunar greenhouse.
Easy genetic manipulationIn Situ plastics production NO theoretical infrastructure mass(*)Fast response of bacteria shielded by slower growing plants.Plants provide nutrients as part of symbiosisBacteria excrete product into intercellular space, forming nodules that can be easily harvested, avoiding plant lignin processingPerfect for poor countries on earth with few resources
Needs work• Never been tried• Internal response/ control parameters of plants
poorly understood• Inoculation of plants with opportunistic
pathogens• Harvesting and processing
Take home lesson1. Biosynthetics and biodegradable plastics can
be a tool for mass savings and functionality on a mars / lunar base
2. A hybrid bioreactor involving plant-microbial symbiosis can overcome many of the disadvantages of using individual plant or microbial biotechnology
3. This technology is only a few years away, and will be of incredible benefit for remote locations on earth and elsewhere.
Bibliography1. Solid Waste Processing and Resource Recovery Workshop Report –EDCTSD CTSD-ADV-474 Rev A July 1, 20022. CVEN 5484 Environmental Microbiology, Mark Hernandez3. Wolfrum, E, and P. Weaver. “Quantitative measurement of the growth rate of the PHA-Producing Photosynthetic Bacterium R. gelatinosus CBS-2” Proceedings of the Renewable and Advanced Energy Systems for the 21st Century. RAES99-7690. 1999.4. Personal Correspondence, Dave Klaus5. Personal Correspondence, Alex Hoehn6. ME!7. http://www.bact.wisc.edu:81/ScienceEd/discuss/msgReader$108. N. Amarger. “Genetically Modified Bacteria in Agriculture.” Biochimie. 84: 1061-1072. 2002