24
Design for the Environment Program Emerging Contaminants and Business Realities: How Can They Be Compatible? March 29, 2006

Design for the Environment Programproceedings.ndia.org/JSEM2006/Thursday/Davies.pdf · Design for the Environment Program Emerging Contaminants and Business Realities: How Can They

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    6

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Design for the Environment Program

Emerging Contaminants and Business Realities:

How Can They Be Compatible?March 29, 2006

DfE Program

DfE projects:

• Are multi-stakeholder & driven by a business “client;”

• Take business realities into account; and

• Benefit business and the environment.

DfE works with chemicals of concern through broad partnerships –reducing exposure and release.

DfE provides access to EPA technical tools and expertise that serve as an incentive for business participation in our work.

DfE projects have touched more than 200,000 business facilities and approximately 2 million

workers, reducing use of chemicals of concern by approximately 237 million pounds per year.

Overview of Presentation

Alternatives Analysis• Electronics

• Flame Retardants

Safer Products

Auto Refinishing Best Practices

Emerging Chemicals and the ECOS/DoD Sustainability Workgroup

Alternatives Analysis

Lead-Free Solder PartnershipLife-Cycle Assessment

-Free Solder Partnership

The U.S. electronics industry is moving away from lead solder (176 million pounds per year)• EU will ban lead in electronics – June 2006• Industry approached DfE based on past

relationship• Partnership is helping U.S. Industry adopt lead-

free alternatives and maintain international competitiveness

Partners • Electronics manufacturers• Assemblers• Suppliers•Trade Associations

• Academic & Research Organizations

• Public Interest Groups

Lead-Free Solder PartnershipLife-Cycle Assessment

-Free Solder Partnership

Key Findings• Cost of mining silver may drive choices• Energy-efficient ovens will cut manufacturing costs

Areas for Further Research • Energy-efficient solder application equipment• Impacts of silver mining and processing• Assessing the leachability of various metals in more realistic environments

Tin-lead and alternatives• 95% tin, 3.9% silver, and 0.6% copper• 57.0% bismuth, 42.0% tin, and 1.0% silver• 96.0% tin, 2.5%silver, 1.0% bismuth, 0.5% copper• 99.2% tin and 0.8% copper

Furniture Flame Retardancy Partnership

The Partnership• Chemical and furniture manufacturers• Consumer Product Safety Commission• NGOs• National Institute of Standards & Technology• Fire Safety Advocates and Environmental

Groups

The Issue • Predominant flame retardant (pentaBDE) was being found increasingly in

human tissue, breast milk and the environment.• This flame retardant was phased-out at the end of 2004.• Need for fire safety will likely increase based on planned national standards.• Decision-making for alternatives to a 19 million pound per year chemical.

Furniture Flame Retardancy Partnership – Goals

Facilitate industry decision-making

Level the playing field

Protect trade-secret information

Drive innovation toward environmentally safer flame retardancy methods

Develop a model for alternatives assessment

Potential Exposure

EcotoxicityHazard Concern

Human HealthHazard Concern

EnvironmentalHazard Concern

Flame Retardants PartnershipAlternatives Report

Final Report online: www.epa.gov/dfe

TBBPA is the highest volume brominated flame retardant at 330 million pounds/year PBDE project plan• present in environment, workers’ blood; • PBT and incineration by-products.

The electronics industry is actively seeking alternatives—ripe for lasting change; our partnership will explore all alternatives• Dell• Intel• IBM• Hewlett Packard• IPC, iNEMI, HDPUG

Furniture flame retardant alternatives assessment for PentaBDE will be used as a model

Flame Retardants Partnership—Stage 2 TBBPA Alternatives Assessment

Flame Retardants for Printed Wiring Boards

• GreenBlue• Clean Production Action• Greenpeace• Flame Retardant

Chemical Manufacturers

Safer Products

Safer ProductsProduct Recognition

Continuous Improvement

Of Concern Improved Sustainable

Characteristics of Ingredient of Concern

Characteristics of Improved Ingredient

Characteristics of Sustainable Ingredient

Continuum of Improvement

Formula Ingredient by Use Class

• Driven by Green Chemistry

• Reduces the Environmental Footprint

• Acknowledges Business Realities

Functional Use

Formulator Program focuses on:• Products with substantial market potential• Industries ready for change• Hazard reduction

Recognition stimulates use of safer chemicals• Reduction of 40 million pounds/year • Safer cleaners, holding tank treatments, industrial

coatings, and fertilizer alternativesFuture areas of focus:• Consumer Products• Innovations

■ Safer coatings & fragrances■ Pesticide-labeled products■ Mercury-free flat panels

Safer ProductsFormulator Program Product Recognition

Safer ProductsLeveraging to multiply reductions

Multi–stakeholder coalition, with over 300 participants

Identify key characteristics of detergent ingredients – for each functional class

• Product formulator could choose “recognition worthy” ingredients

Existing PartnersDfE Formulator PartnersDfE commends these companies for their leadership in designing products that are good for their business and for the environment!

Amrep, Inc. Anderson Chemical Co. *Avmor Group Bi-O-Kleen Industries*Carroll Company Clean Control Corporation Coastwide Laboratories Daley International (Provisional)Earth Alive Resources, Inc. Florida Chemical Company GEMTEK Products Inkware, LLC Noramtech CorporationNorchem Corporation

Organic Products Company Osprey Biotechnics, Inc. Pantheon Chemical Penetone Corporation Pioneer Eclipse Corporation Polycon Systems, Inc. PolyPortables, Inc.State Industrial Products, Inc. Sunburst Chemicals, Inc. SYSCO Corporation*Triple S U S Chemical CorporationU.S. Polychemical CorporationVertec Biosolvents, Inc.SC Johnson

* An asterisk appears before DfE licensee partners.

Auto Refinishing Best Practices

Why Auto Refinishing?• Isocyanates, VOCs & metals• Dispersive use• Leading source of

occupational asthma• Linked to asthma in children

Best Practices – important use with no alternatives.

Auto Refinishing Best Practices

Auto Refinishing Best Practices

DfE Best Practices for Auto Refinishing complemented regulatory requirements for the Area Source Rule

Effective, low-resource implementing mechanismVOC emissions could be reduced by 86,000 tons per year and auto refinishing shops could save $650 million

Partners in developing Best Practices• Collision repair shops in AL, PA, VA, NC, SC, WA, NY• Trade associations, trade press & career/technical trainers• Paint and equipment manufacturers/suppliers• OSHA, NIOSH, ATSDR and State Small Business Compliance

Assistance and Pollution Prevention Programs

Best PracticesEstimated Effectiveness

Reduction in Auto Body Shop Emissions with Best Practices

0102030405060708090

100

Conventional SprayGun (No Booth)

HVLP Spray Gun Booth & ConventionalSpray Gun

Booth & HVLP SprayGun

Best Practice

% R

educ

tion

in E

mis

sion

s Diisocyanates

Lead, Chromium

Organic Solvents

Emerging Chemicals and the ECOS/DoD Sustainability Workgroup

Coordination Framework for Emerging Chemicals

Development driven by Furniture Flame Retardancy Partnership communication issuesPurpose• Coordinate• Make information available• Provide avenues for addressing emerging chemical issues

Group meets periodically• Information dissemination• Consider “candidate” chemicals

All EPA Offices – Headquarters, Regions & States

ECOS/DoD Sustainability Workgroup

Collaboration between DoD and the States over certain environmental issues• Includes a pollution prevention strategy for emerging chemicals

February joint ECOS/DoD meeting• P2 issue paper and draft work plan – approved

• foundation for future work

August ECOS meeting – Consider a broad P2 resolution

November joint ECOS/DoD conference – Focus will be pollution prevention

ECOS/DoD P2 Issue Paper-- Recommendations --

New Weapons Systems – consider alternative chemicals

Newly developed compounds should be subject to toxicity testing and exposure modeling

P2 should be used as a positive public relations tool

Mechanisms should be developed for sharing information

Contact Information

Clive Davies

[email protected]

202-564-3821

http://www.epa.gov/DfE