Upload
adam-resler
View
236
Download
25
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Design of a Scramjet Engine
Adam J. Resler
ME 566 – Aerospace Propulsion
Wed 04/29/15
Overview
• Scramjet Introduction
• Current State of Scramjet Technology
• Design Considerations
• Methods
• Results and Conclusions
• Questions & Comments
Scramjet Introduction
Scramjet Benefits
• Air-Breathing Engine – No oxidizer required to be carried onboard
• No moving parts
• Theoretical Specific Impulse between 1000 – 4000 seconds
• Escape velocity capable; Theoretical Range between Mach 5 and Mach 26 flight velocity
Scramjet Disadvantages
• Special materials requirements – High strength/weight – scramjet have high
payload mass fractions making weight a concern
– High thermal stress characteristics – heavy cooling burden; also loss of cooling ability as fuel is consumed
• Current designs typically start at Mach 5
• Poor thrust/weight ratio
• Low to very low lift/drag ratio
Scramjet Programs
• SCRAM: USA; Mach 4 – 10 • National Aerospace Plane (NASP): USA; Mach 17
Upper Limit; Mach 25 Possible; Current H2 Combustion Model (31 Reactions; 16 Species)
• HyShot: Australia; Flew at Mach 7.6 for 6 seconds; 10 vehicles; 40% Success Rate
• HyperX: USA; Mach 7 for 11 seconds (15 miles) 2004; Mach 10 in 2004;
• X-51 Waverider: USA; In 2013 flew for 240 seconds ~Mach 5.1 before running out of fuel
NASA X-43A HS Vehicle w/ Scramjet
Design Considerations
• Design Velocity: Mach 5
• Maximum Temperature: 2000 K
• Flight Altitude: 15 km
• Number of Inlet Shocks: 3
Design Method
• Solution of the simplified compressible, inviscid, Navier-Stokes equations with semi-perfect gas equations of state
• Generalized Quasi-1D Flow – takes into account area change, friction, and heat addition; however, no differential mass terms
• Complete combustion model (no dissociation, complete combustion prior to nozzle)
Results of Analysis
• Thrust: 405.7 kN (91,210 lbf)
• Isp: 174.1 s
• Efficiency: 0.83pr/0.56t/.47o
• TSFC: 0.01757 kg/kN-s
• T/ma: 0.572 kN-s/kg
• Time in engine: 0.0021 s
• Specific burn time: 9.82 s/m3
Results of Analysis
Property Diffuser Combustor Nozzle
Pressure Recovery
0.8355 0.5433 0.6724
Total Recovery
0.3053
Adiabatic Efficiency
0.9243 1.0 0.9127
Perspective
• Actual speed-over-land: ~0.9 to 1 mile/second
• New York to LA: 44.68 minutes
• Around Earth at Equator: 7.576 hours
• Destin, FL to New Orleans, LA: 5 minutes
• Compared to F-15 Eagle P&W F100-220 Turbofan Engine: ~3.8 times more thrust
Conclusions
• Low specific impulse - unexpected
• Engine not viable unless installed in a large vehicle
• Better combustion model required to study higher Mach numbers
Summary
• Scramjet Introduction
• Current State of Scramjet Technology
• Design Considerations
• Methods
• Results and Conclusions
• Questions & Comments
Q&C
• Scramjet CFD Model (1 min) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kaVDDm222H8
• Scramjet Engine Wind Tunnel Test (no apparent combustion): (40 sec)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EfJp2luk_IY