Design of Abutment Bridge

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    1/51

    Substructure Kondre (r

    Dimension of slab and beams (brought from slab sheet) Check for correctness of data

    Length of single span = 35.000 m

    Carriageway width, Bc = 7.500 m

    Overall width of Bridge, Bo = 10.700 m

    No. of main girder = 5

    Dimensions of the longitudinal girder is taken as follows:

    Length (Lsi

    ) = 35.000 m

    Breadth (B si ) = 0.550 m

    Thickness(Tsi) = 1.680 m

    Distance betn girders = 2.375 m

    No. of cross beams = 15

    For the design purposes the dimensions of the cross beam is taken as follows:

    Length (L si ) = 2.375 m

    Breadth (B si ) = 0.140 m

    Thickness(Tsi) = 0.300 m

    Distance betn cross beams = 2.500 m

    For the design purposes the dimensions of the internal slab is taken as follows:

    Length (L si ) = 2.500 m Hence, effec.span in long.dir. = 2.360 m

    Breadth (B si ) = 2.375 m Hence, effec.span in transv.dir. = 1.825 mThickness(Tsi) = 0.230 m

    Avg. pavement cover over Slab(Tsp ) = 0.075 m

    kerb/footpath

    breadth = 0.225 m at bottom and 0.225 m at top

    height = 1.000 m

    For design purpose dimension of cantilever slab is taken as

    Length (L si ) = 1.00 m

    Breadth (B si ) = 0.600 m from c/c of outer girder

    Breadth (B si ) = 0.325 m from outer face of outer main girder

    Breadth of carriageway = 1.000 m from c/c of outer girder

    1.016 m from outer face of outer main girder

    Thickness(Tsi) = 0.230 m at the endThickness(Tsi) = 0.230 m at outer face of main girder

    Avg. pavement cover over Slab(Tsp ) = 0.08 m

    2.2 DESIGN OF RIGHT ABUTMENT

    The freebody diagram of the R.C.C Abutment is shown below:

    i = 0 0.200

    0.40 CG of Stem from inner vertical face:

    A 1= 3.324

    0.23 A2= 2.674

    M.A.= 1.327

    A1+A2 = 5.998

    0.600 CG = 0.221

    b = 90

    Dimensions taken for the design of abutment:

    Retaining wall Bottom level of base = 0.000

    Length = 9.500 m Road level = 5.000 ######

    Breadth = 0.600 m at bottom 0.23 m at top 1.25

    Height = 14.454 m CG of retain. wall from point A = 0.221 m

    Ballast wall

    Length = 9.500 m

    Breadth = 0.400 m

    Breadth of ret. wall = 0.200 m

    Height = 1.000 m height of superstr. plus bearing

    Return wall without pav.cover

    No. = 2

    Breadth = 0.200 m Height of Return wall H1= 0.7

    14.4

    54

    Pa

    A

    d

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    2/51

    Substructure Kondre (rig

    Length = 6.000 m Height of Return wall H2= 0.4

    Total height of abutment = 15.454 m

    Approach slab

    Length = 5.000 m 16.354

    Breadth = 3.000 m -11.354

    Thickness = 0.200 m

    Foundation is open foundation

    Length = 6.000 m

    Width 2.750 m Heel 1.000 m 0.750Toe 1.000 m 0.750

    Height of footing = 0.900 1.250

    Volume = 14.850 m3 W = 356.40 KN

    2.2.1 CALCULATION OF LOAD

    STRESS DUE TO DEAD LOAD

    S.N Elements Unit No. L(m) B(m) H(m) Volume Unit Wt Total e from

    Dead Load of Superstructure

    1 Hand rails 6.368 rm 4 35.60 142.40 0.06 8.54

    2 Railing posts cum 18 0.15 0.15 1.00 0.41 24 9.72

    3 Wearing course cum 1 35.60 7.50 0.08 20.03 22 440.55

    4 Kerbs cum 2 35.60 0.23 1.00 16.02 24 384.48

    5 Deck slab i) rectangle cum 1 35.60 2.93 0.23 23.95 24 574.80

    ii)trapezoid cum 2 35.60 0.33 0.23 5.32 24 127.73

    6 Main Girder i) fillets cum 8 35.60 0.30 0.15 6.41 24 153.79

    ii) webs cum 5 35.60 0.60 1.45 154.86 24 ######

    7 Internal Cross Girder i) fillets cum 0 1.83 0.15 0.15 0.00 24 0.00

    ii) webs cum 0 1.83 0.14 0.07 0.00 24 0.00

    8 End Cross Girder i) fillets cum 2 1.83 0.15 0.15 0.04 24 0.99

    ii) webs cum 2 1.83 0.14 0.07 0.04 24 0.86

    Total Dead load of the superstructure #####

    Total DL coming to one abutment = 2709 KN

    Dead Load of Abutment

    retaining wall 9.500 0.415 14.454 56.98 24 1367.64 0.000 m

    return walls 2 6.000 0.200 0.55 1.32 24 31.68 2.208 m

    ballast wall 9.500 0.400 1.00 3.80 24 91.20 0.007 m

    1490.52

    STRESS DUE TO LIVE LOAD

    Live load due to class A loading:

    Maximum load on the given abutment is produced when the train of load is positioned as shown in the figure:

    Axle Load,KN 27 27 114 114 68 68 68 68

    x i , m 35.0 33.8 29.5 26.5 23.5 20.5

    y i 1.0 1.0 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6

    load, KN 114.0 110.1 57.3 51.5 45.7 39.8

    Maximum total live load = 418.4 KN

    Load due to impact = 418.37714 x 0.110 = 45.919 KN

    Live load including impact = 418.4 + 45.919 = 464.3 KN

    Live load due to class AA wheeled loading:

    Axle Load,KN 200 200

    x i , m 19.0 17.8

    y i 0.54 0.51

    load, KN 108.6 101.71

    Maximum total live load = 210.3 KN

    Load due to impact = 210.28571 x 0.18 = 37.851 KN

    Live load including impact = 210.3 + 37.851429 = 248.1 KN

    Live load due to class AA tracked loading:

    Maximum total live load = 664.0 KN

    Load due to impact = 664 x 0.1 = 66.4 KN

    Live load including impact = 664.0 + 66.4 = 730.4 KN

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    3/51

    Substructure Kondre (rig

    Out of above three loadings class AA tracked loading gives maximum load to abutment.

    Maximum live load to abutment = 730.4 KN

    CALCULATIONOF EARTH PRESSURE FOR RETAINING WALL

    Horizontal earth pressure due to backfil

    Corresponding to F = 30 of the backfill material

    g = 18 KN/m3 g ' = 8 KN/m3

    Ka = 0.2973 ( Coulomb's theory applicable )

    Ep1 = Ko x g h2

    /2 = 639.1 KN/m h = 15.454 m

    Horizontal component of earth pressure = 639.1 cos 20 = 600.5 KN/m

    which acts at 0.42 x h = 6.49 m from the top of footing base.

    Vertical component of earth pressure = 639.1 x sin 20 = 218.570 KN/m

    which acts at 0.221 m inward from the CG of wall.

    Total Horizontal Thrust, E1 = Ep1 x L = 5704.9 KN

    Total Vertical Thrust, E2= Ep2 x L = 2076.4 KN

    WEIGHT OF BACKFILL BEHIND THE ABUTMENT

    Wb = 9.1 x 1.000 x 15.5 x 18 = 2531.37 KN

    STRESS DUE TO SEISMIC FORCES

    Horizontal Forces due to seismicity are computed using the formula as shown in IS Code 1893 or IRC - 6

    F eq = a x b x l x G

    where a = 0.08 for the zone V of seismic intensityb = 1.2 for medium soil with isolated footingl = 1 importance factor

    Thus seismic coefficient is taken as 0.096

    a. Seismic force due to Superstructure = 0.096 x 2709.05 = 260.1 KN

    height of action of the force = 14.45 + 0.025 + 1.68 / 2 =

    = 15.319 m

    b. Seismic force due to Abutment = 0.096 x 1491 = 143.1 KN

    act at cg of abutment = 7.727 m

    c. Seismic force due to Back fill = 0.096 x 2531.4 = 243.01 KN

    acts at cg = 7.727 m

    STRESS DUE TO WATER CURRENT

    Horizontal Thrust due to water current is ignored, because it usually contributes to the stability

    of the wall and the load case with seismic condition does not concide with HFL.

    STRESS DUE TO LONGITUDINAL FORCES

    Due to Tractive Effort or Braking Force

    Braking Force due to Class AA tracked load = @20% of live load/2 = 1/2 to one abutment

    = 55.4 KN

    height of the line of action of the brake from the road level = 1.2 m

    height of the bearing level from the top of base = 14.454 m

    Due to Resistance in Bearing (Temperature)

    The critical case will be when seismic force acts in the direction of traffic. But according to IRC 6-1966 (222.7) "The seismic force due to live loa

    shall not be considered when acting in the direction of traffic,..".

    P

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    4/51

    Substructure Kondre (rig

    Severe moment is produced when the LL is within span. Assume frictional coeff. = 0.225 in free bearing

    = 0.2 in other bearing

    Frictional resistance at free bearing = 773.9 KN

    Frictional resistance of fixed bearing = 687.9 KN

    Unbalanced frictional force = 86.0 KN

    Line of action of the force from the bottom of the abutment = 14.454 m

    STRESS DUE TO WIND LOAD

    Exposed height of structure = depth of the beams + thickness of slab +

    + height of kerb =

    = 2.68 m

    Exposed area contributing to wind pressure = 93.8 m

    Avg. height of superstructure from the bed = 6.000 m

    intensity of wind load = 0.73 KN/m

    velocity of wind = 107 km/hr

    The design is to be conducted for one span only loaded with class A train of vehicle

    Length of Class A train = 20.4 m

    a. Wind Force on Surface (SS) = 0.73 x 93.8 = 68.474 KN

    b. Wind Force on Moving

    vehicle Class A train = 20.4 x 3 = 61.2 KN

    acts at 1.5 m above road level = -9.854 m

    Maximum load is obtained in exposed area = 129.7 KN

    For lateral direction

    wind load = 129.7 KN

    acts at = 15.454 m

    SUMMARY OF LOADS FOR DESIGN OF ABUTMENTS

    S.No. Load Vertical (KN) Horizontal (KN) Arm Moment (KN

    Longit. dir Later. (m) Longit. Later.

    1 Superstructure

    1.1 Dead load of SS(D) 2709.1 0.48 1297.01.2 Live Load of SS (L) including impact 438.0 0.48 209.7

    Substructure2 DL of abutment(E)

    Retaining wall 1367.6 0.00

    Return wall - Top section 31.7 -2.21 -69.9

    Ballast wall 91.2 -0.01 -0.7

    Backfill (BF) 2531 0.00 0.0

    Earth pressure (EP) 35062.779

    (EP1) 5704.9 6.49 ######

    Due to overburden(EP2)

    Frontal passive soil mass (EPp)

    3 Buoyancy (B)

    4 Longitudinal force4.1 Tractive force (T) 55.40 14.45 800.8

    4.2 Due to temperature (F) 85.99 14.45 1242.8

    4.3 Wind Load 129.67 15.45 2003.

    4.4 Centrifugal force (CF)

    4.5 Thrust due to water current (WC)

    4.6 Seismic forces (FS)

    on superstructure 130.03 260.07 260.07 15.32 3984.0 3983.

    on abutment 71.54 143.09 143.09 7.73 1105.7 1105.

    on live load 42.05 16.95 712.8

    from backfill 121.51 243.01 243.011 7.727 1877.7 1877.

    Load combination Group II (Normal+Temp. condition)

    4638 5846 129.7 ##### 200

    D + L + E + Ep1+ Ep2 + Ep3+ T + F + CF

    Taking

    Rankin's

    earth

    pressure

    coefficient.

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    5/51

    Substructure Kondre (righ

    Load combination Group IV (for Seismic dry condition)

    D + L + E + Ep1+ Ep2 + T + F + CF + FS 7492 6492 688.2 ##### 7680

    Note: Moment is taken at the critical section at the bottom of the ABUTMENT

    2.2.2 STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF ABUTMENT RETAINING WALL

    Design of the returning wall will be done based on normal loading condition, but checked on maximum loading

    Design parameters

    Vertical force = 4638 KNLong. Moment = 40508 KN-m

    Substructures are designed using M20 concrete and Fe415 steel reinforcement

    Parameters for RCC design

    Conccrete M20 sck = 20 N/mm2

    Steel sy = 415 N/mm2

    (Under combination group IV the permissible increase of stress is

    50%, hence Combination I governs the design longitudinal

    moment)

    Page 5

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    6/51

    Substructure Kondre (right

    Approximate Area of Steel reinforcement required is calculated considering singly reinforced beam theory

    Ast = Mu/ (0.87xy x 0.7984 x d) = 234060 mm2

    Provide 25 mm dia. bars Ast = 490.625 mm2

    Required spacing = 0.9 mm c/c Provide at 100 mm c/c Decrease spacing !

    Area of reinforcement provided, Ast = 45873.438 mm2

    r = 0.8047971 % > 0.2 %

    At the frontal face, the design moment is greatly reduced because of lack of earth pressure.

    Therefore on this side provide only 50 % of the main reinforcement

    Ast = 234060 x0.5 = 117030 mm2

    Provide 20 mm dia. bars Ast = 314 mm2

    Required spacing = 20 1.2 mm c/c Provide at 100 mm c/c Decrease spec

    Area of reinforcement provided, Ast = 29359 mm2

    Same spacing of reinforcement is provided on the side faces of the abutment.

    Distribution re-bar

    Providing 0.12% of cross sectional area = 0.0012 x 600 x 1000= 720 mm2

    Provide 12 mm dia. bars Ast = 113.04 mm2

    Required spacing = 314.0 mm c/c Provide at 250 mm c/c at both faces. ok

    Check for stresses (For seismic condition) Parameters for RCC design

    Conccrete M20 sck = 20 N/mm2

    Normal Thrust , W = 7492018 N Steel sy = 415 N/mm2

    Bending Moment = ######### N-mm

    Ecentricity, e = 6336.850 mm > 128.125 mm

    breadth, b = 9500 mm m = 0.0

    Total depth , D = 600 mm

    Effective depth, d = 512.5 mm

    Compressive steel cover, dc = 75 mm Ac = 29359 mm2

    Tensile steel cover, dt = 75 mm At = 45873.44 mm2

    Ast = Mu/ (0.87xy x 0.7984 x d) 178050.265 mm2/m

    x= 0.87*y*Ast 8928 mm 150 mm say

    0.36*ck*b

    Check for shear stress:

    Critical secion for shear in case of abutment stem is considered at distance d = 512.5 mm from the junction

    of base slab.

    Horizontal force due to soil pressure = 5559.80 KN

    Breaking force = 55.40 KN

    Longitudinal force due to temperature effect = 85.99 KN

    Shear force V = 5701.18 KN

    Shear stress tc = V/(b d) = 0.744 N/mm2

    Permissible shear stress without shear reinforcement tcmax =2.8 Mpa for M20 concrete

    Where, As = Area of Steel provided in mm2

    b = width of abutment vertical wall and d = thickness of abutment wall p= 4.05%

    tc = basic values given for different p% of Steel provided = 0.28 Mpa for M20 concr < 0.744 N/mm2

    From Table 19 of IS 456-200

    The design of ballest wall and return wall will be as in left side abutment.

    2.1.3 DESIGN OF BALLAST WALL

    A

    Page 6

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    7/51

    Substructure Kondre (rig

    RCC balast wall (as shown in the figure) monolithic to the abutment has been designed.

    0.40 m

    m

    CALCULATION OF DEAD LOAD STRESSES

    Dead load from the approach slab (triangular portion) = 36 KN

    = 3.7894737 KN/m

    Dead load of the Ballast wall = 91.2 KN

    = 9.6 KN/m

    Earth pressure from the back fill = ca x r x h2 /2 = 3.12 KN/mr = 21 KN/m3ca = 0.2973

    LIVE LOAD STRESS CALCULATION

    Class AA (tr) load component on wall , LL =

    = 291.667 KN

    = 30.702 KN/m

    Add impact to live load @ , I = 0.1 = 3.070 KN/m

    e = 0.15 m from axis of ballast wall

    Horizontal Load due to braking of train of vehicle class A vehicle, T =(0.2 ) x(27+114*2) = 51.0 KN

    (Front vehicle only considered) = 5.4 KN/m

    Compaction load is maximum at the depth of 1.2m from the top.

    P comp = 25.2 KN/m

    Maximum shear force on section I-I

    H = T or Pcopm+ Ep = 28.3 KN/mV = DL + LL + I = 47.2 KN/m

    Moment given due to the forces on the critical section I - I at the base of the ballast wall

    M = ( LL + I) x e + T x h + Ep x h /3 == 17.92 KN-m/m

    Area of vertical steel reinforcement required

    Ast = Mu/ (0.87xy x 0.7984 x d) 165.746387 mm2/m

    Provide 12 mm dia bars @ 200 c/c for the continuation of bar from retaining wall

    Area of steel provided = 565.2 mm2/m

    Provide 12 mm dia bars @ 200 c/c on the opposite face

    Area of steel provided = 565.2 mm2/mHorizontal links are provided of 12 mm dia. bars @ 200 c/c

    Stresses at the section,

    Shear stress,tmax = 0.083 N/mm2

    Permissible shear stress without shear reinforcement tcmax = 2.8 N/mm2

    Where, As = Area of Steel provided in mm2

    p= 0.28% 0.28

    tc = basic values given for different p% of Steel provided = 0.38 Mpa for M20 concr > 0.083 N/mm2

    From Table 19 of IS 456-200 ok

    2.1.4 DESIGN OF RETURN WALLS

    1

    .000

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    8/51

    Substructure Kondre (rig

    These will be monolithic with the back wall. They are joined together through 300 mm x 300 mm fillets.

    The loads acting on the wing wall (return wall) would be earth pressure and horizontal force to kerb as specified in the code.

    STRESS DUE TO VERTICAL LOADS

    All the stresses are calculated for the critical section I-I at the bottom face of the abutment

    Dead load of the returnwall = 6.000 x 0.550 x 0.200 x 24 = 15.84 KN

    = 2.64 KN/m

    Vert. LL from Class A load = 168.72 KN 56.24 KN/m

    Add Impact due to LL @ 0.25= 42.18 KN 14.06 KN/m

    STRESSES DUE TO HORIZONTAL FORCES

    Horizontal Thrust due to DL+LL+IL=q*L*ka = 24.070 KN/m

    acts at h/2 0.28 m from the top of foundation

    Moment due to hor. component of vertical loads = 433.2636 KN-m/r.m

    Earth pressure from the backfill = ka x rs x h^2/2 = 0.94 KN/m

    Moment due to earth pressure = 16.998 KN-m

    Momt due to later. force = 7.5 KN/m for the curb as per code = 135.000 KN-m

    Total horz. uniformly distributed load = 24.07 + 0.94 + 7.5 = 32.51 KN/m

    Total Moment = 433.26 + 17.00 + 135.000 = 585.26

    depth required = M /( 0.138ck b ) = 620.925 mmwhere b = ( 700 + 400 ) / 2 = 550 mm

    Provide overall depth = 650 mm

    Ast = Mu/ (0.87xy x 0.7984 x d) 3530.97 mm2/m

    Tensile steel re-bar equired = 3530.97 mm2

    Provide 25 mm dia. bars Ast = 490.87 mm2

    Required spacing = 139.0 mm c/c Provide at 150 mm c/c Decrease specing !

    2.2.3 DESIGN OF FOUNDATION

    Foundation is designed as open foundation of the rectangular shape

    Length = 6.00 m

    Breadth = 2.75 m heel 1.000 m

    toe 1.000 m

    width of abutment 0.600 m

    Height = 0.9 m

    Concrete cover 75 mm

    DEAD LOAD due to foundation = 356.4 KN

    CALCULATIONOF EARTH PRESSURE FOR FOUNDATION

    Horizontal earth pressure due to backfill

    Ka = 0.2973 As calculated earlier for abutment stem. ( Coulomb's theory applicable )

    Ep1 = Ka x g h2

    /2 = 715.66 KN/m h = 16.354 m

    Horizontal component of earth pressure = 715.7 x cos 20 = 672.499 KN/m

    which acts at 0.42 x h = 6.87 m from the bottom of footing base.

    Pressure due to surcharge: As approach slab has been provided no surcharge load is to be taken as per code.

    WEIGHT OF BACKFILL BEHIND THE ABUTMENT

    Wb = 6.000 x 1.000 x 15.454 x 18.00 = 1669.0 KN

    Wf = 6.000 x 1.000 x 0 x 18.00 = 0.0 KN

    acts at 0.8 m from centre of abutment

    Seismic force due to Foundation = 0.096 x 356.4 = 34.214 KN

    act at cg of abutment = 0.45 m

    Seismic force due to back fill = 0.096 x 1669.0 = 160.23 KN

    act at cg of backfill = 8.627 m from the bottom of foundation base

    SUMMARY OF LOADS FOR DESIGN OF FOUNDATION

    P 8

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    9/51

    Substructure Kondre (rig

    S.No. Load Vertical (KN) Horiz L. arm M[r] M(o)

    (KN) (m) KN-m KN-m

    1 Superstructure

    1.1 Dead load of SS(D) 2709.05 0.8 2224.79

    1.2 Live Load on SS including impact (L) 438.0 0.8 359.705

    Substructure2 DL of abutment(E)

    Retaining wall 1367.64 1.3 1777.93Return wall 31.68 3.5 111.118

    Ballast wall 91.20 1.3 118.56

    Backfill (BF) 1669.03 2.10 3504.97

    Backfill (FR)

    Earth pressure (EP)

    Triangular dry(EP1) 6388.7 -6.9 -43882

    Due to overburden(EP2) 0.00 0

    Frontal passive soil mass (EPp)

    DL of foundation 356.40 1.4 490.05

    3 Buoyancy (B)

    4 Longitudinal force

    4.1 Breaking (breaking) force (T) 55.40 -15.4 -850.6

    4.2 Due to temperature (F) 85.99 -15.4 -13204.3 Wind Load

    4.4 Centrifugal force (CF)

    4.5 Thrust due to water current (WC)

    4.6 Seismic forces (FS)

    on superstructure 130.03 260.1 -15.3 -1992

    on abutment 71.54 143.1 -7.7 -552.8

    on live load 0

    on foundation 17.11 34.2 -0.5 -7.698

    from backfill 80.11 160.2 -8.6 -691.1

    Load combination Group I (N+T condition)

    D + L + I + E + Ep1+ Ep2 +BF+ T + F + CF 6663.0 6530 8587.12 -46053

    Load combination Group IV (for Seismic dry condition)

    D + L + E + Ep1+ Ep2 +BF+ T + F + CF + FS 6961.8 7128 8587 -48446

    Note: Moment is taken about the toe for check against overturning .

    403.82

    For Normal condition For Seismic condition

    P = 6663 KN P = 6962 KN

    Mnet = Mr-Mo= -37465.918 Mnet = Mr-Mo= -39859 KN-m

    x = Mnet/P= -5.6229806 x = Mnet/P= -5.7254 m

    e = b/2-x'= 6.9979806 > b/6, hence tesion e = b/2-x'= 7.10 > b/6, hence t

    Pmax=P/A*(1+6*e/b) = 6569.444 KN/m2 Pmax=P/A*(1+6*e/b) = 6958.3 KN/m

    Pmin=P/A*(1-6*e/b) = -5761.807 KN/m2 Pmin=P/A*(1-6*e/b) = -6114 KN/m

    Where, A=b x d = 16.5 m2

    CHECK AGAINST OVERTURNING

    Case: Normal

    Factor of Safety against overturning =Mres/Mov= 8587.1227 / 46053 = 0.2 > 2.0 Safe

    Case: Seismic

    Factor of Safety against overturning =Mres/Mov= 8587.1227 / 48446 = 0.2 >1.5 Safe

    CHECK AGAINST SLIDING

    Case : Normal

    The minimum vertical force will be when there is no live load and the front backfill is washed out = ###### KN

    The resisting force againest sliding = (vertical force) x (coefficient of friction b/w concrete and soil)

    = 6225.00 x 0.45 = 2801.25 KN

    The sliding force is the horizontal forces = 6474.72 KN

    Hence, Factor of Safety against sliding =Pres/Psl= 2801.25 / 6474.7 = 0.433 >1.5 Hence Sa

    ( f = 0.45 soil/concrete)

    Case: Seismic

    The minimum vertical force will be when there is no live load and the front backfill is washed out = ######

    The resisting force againest sliding = (vertical force) x (coefficient of friction b/w concrete and soil)

    = 6523.80 x 0.45 = 2935.71 KN

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    10/51

    Substructure Kondre (righ

    The sliding force is the horizontal forces = 7072.32 KN

    Hence, Factor of Safety against sliding =Pres/Psl= 2935.71 / 7072.3 = 0.415 >1.25 Hence Sa

    STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF FOUNDATION

    Design of toe slab:

    Wt of toe slab = 21.6 KN/m2 1412.739 -1277.72

    1.000 m 0.600 m 1.000 m

    2.75 m

    Pressure distribution diagram

    concrete grede : M 20

    Steel grade : Fe 415

    Moment about EF = 2414.47 KN-m 2414.47

    d= M /( 0.138 564.0 mmAdopt D = 600 mm

    d = 500 mm

    Ast = Mu/ (0.87xy x 0.7 16752 mm2 Minimum reinforc. as per code = 1000 mm2

    Using 16 mm dia bar, spacing = 12.0 mm

    Adopt 16 mm dia bar, spacing = 150 mm c/c Area of re-bar provided = 1339.73

    mm2

    Check for shear stress:In toe critical section for shear is considered at a distance d = 500

    from abutment stem.

    Shear force at critical section V = 15776.00 KN b= 6.00 m 6548

    3969

    13

    91

    Shear stress = V/(b d) = 5.259 N/mm2

    Permissible shear stress without shear reinforcement tcmax =2.8 Mpa for M20 concrete

    Where, k1 = 1.14 - 0.7 d >= 0.5 ( d in m ) 0.5 m

    Where, As = Area of Steel provided in mm2

    b = width of abutment vertical wall and d = thickness of abutment wall p= 0.037% 0.04

    tc = basic values given for different p% of Steel provided = 0.280 N/mm2 < 5.259 N/mm2

    From Table 19 of IS 456-200 Not ok. Revise section or provide shear re-bar

    Design of heel slab:

    Upward pressure on the heel slab varies from -5761.8073 Kn/m2 to -1277.72 Kn/m2

    In addition to the upward pressure the heel slab is subjected to downward pressure due to the self weight of heel

    slab and weight of earth fill on heel slab:

    Down pressure due to self weight = 14.4 KN/m2

    Down pressure due to backfill = 278.172 KN/m2

    292.572 KN/m2 1570

    6054

    Net down pressure = 6054 KN/m2 max

    1570 KN/m2 min 1.000 m

    Moment about DG= 2279.841 KN-m

    d= M /( 0.138ck b ) 908.862 mmAdopt D = 600 mm

    d = 500 mm

    Ast = Mu/ (0.87xy x 0.7984 x d) = 15818 mm2 Minimum reinforc. as per code = 1000 mm2

    Using 16 mm dia bar, specing = 13 mm

    Adopt 16 mm dia bar, specing = 150 mm c/c Area of re-bar provided = 1339.7 mm2

    ####

    #

    KN/m2

    6547.8

    4 ####

    6569.4

    4

    A B

    CDE

    F G

    Page 10

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    11/51

    Substructure Kondre (rig

    Distribution re-bar

    0.12/100 x 900 = 1080 mm2/runnig meter

    Using 12 mm dia bar, specing = 209.3 mm

    Adopt 12 mm dia bar, specing = 200 mm c/c at top and bottom

    Check for shear stress:

    Since the load on the heel is predominantly downward, it induces tensile reactio at its junction with stem.

    Hence the critical section for shear for the heel slab is considered at the face of support.

    Shear force V = 22874.002 KN b = 6.00 m

    Shear stress = V/(b d) = 7.625 N/mm2

    Permissible shear stress without shear reinforcement tcmax =2.8 N/mm2

    Mpa for M20 concrete

    Where, k1 = 1.14 - 0.7 d >= 0.5 ( d in m )

    Where, As = Area of Steel provided in mm2

    b = width of abutment vertical wall and d = thickness of abutment wall p= 0.037% 0.04

    tc = basic values given for different p% of Steel provided =

    From Table 19 of IS 456-200 0.28 N/mm2 < 7.6247 N/mm2 Not ok

    Page 11

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    12/51

    Substructure Kondre (rig

    P 12

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    13/51

    Substructure Kondre (ri

    i i

    Ws

    d

    PaPa

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    14/51

    Substructure Kondre (rig

    b b

    Coulomb Rankin

    i F b d

    0 30 90 20 a

    h = 30 Let us find out which theory is applicable:

    a = 60 1.7321 m < 15.454 m hence Coulomb's theory applicable

    Ka=

    Coul. 0.75 0.9397 2.6845 0.2973

    Rankin 1 0.75 0.5 1.5 0.3333

    Hor pressure from Rankin's theory = 716.48 KN/m

    Horizontal thrust = 6806.5 acts at 5.15 m from the top of foundation footing.

    Weight of soil is also to

    be considered in Rankin's

    Theroy.

    Weight of soil is not

    to be considered in

    Coulumb's Theroy.

    90-b i

    P 14

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    15/51

    Substructure Kondre (rig

    P 15

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    16/51

    Substructure Kondre (rig

    P 16

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    17/51

    Substructure Kondre (right)

    g !

    Page 17

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    18/51

    Substructure Kondre (rig

    P 18

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    19/51

    Substructure Kondre (rig

    P 19

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    20/51

    Substructure Kondre (rig

    n

    P 20

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    21/51

    Substructure Kondre (rig

    P 21

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    22/51

    Substructure Kondre (rig

    vise section or provide shear re-bar

    P 22

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    23/51

    Dimension of slab and beams (brought from slab sheet) Check for correctne

    Length of single span = 8.000 m

    Carriageway width, Bc = 3.000 m

    Overall width of Bridge, Bo = 6.000 m

    No. of main girder = 3

    Dimensions of the longitudinal girder is taken as follows:

    Length (L si ) = 8.000 m

    Breadth (B si ) = 0.600 m

    Thickness(Tsi) = 0.750 m

    Distance betn girders = 2.400 m

    No. of cross beams = 2

    For the design purposes the dimensions of the cross beam is taken as follows:

    Length (L si ) = 3.000 m

    Breadth (B si ) = 0.600 m

    Thickness(Tsi) = 0.900 m

    Distance betn cross beams = 8.000 m

    For the design purposes the dimensions of the internal slab is taken as follows:

    Length (L si ) = 8.600 m Hence, effec.span in long.dir. =

    Breadth (B si ) = 3.600 m Hence, effec.span in transv.dir. =

    Thickness(Tsi) = 0.200 m

    Avg. pavement cover over Slab(Tsp ) = 0.070 m

    kerb/footpath

    breadth = 1.000 m at bottom and 0.225 m at top

    height = 0.500 m

    For design purpose dimension of cantilever slab is taken as

    Length (L si ) = 1.00 m

    Breadth (B si ) = 0.600 m from c/c of outer girder

    Breadth (B si ) = 0.300 m from outer face of outer main girder

    Breadth of carriageway = 2.400 m from c/c of outer girder

    0.300 m from outer face of outer main girder

    Thickness(Tsi) = 0.200 m at the endThickness(Tsi) = 0.200 m at outer face of main girder

    Avg. pavement cover over Slab(Tsp ) = 0.07 m

    2.2 DESIGN OF RIGHT ABUTMENT

    The freebody diagram of the R.C.C Abutment is shown below:

    0.20 i = 0 CG of Stem from inner vertical face:

    A 1= 1.860

    0.60 A2= 0.233

    M.A.= 0.709d

    Pa

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    24/51

    A1+A2 = 2.093

    0.750 b = 90 CG = 0.339

    Dimensions taken for the design of abutment:

    Retaining wall Bottom level of base =

    Length = 6.000 m Road level =Breadth = 0.750 m at bottom 0.60 m at top 1.25

    Height = 3.100 m CG of retain. wall from point A = 0.339 m

    Ballast wall

    Length = 6.000 m

    Breadth = 0.200 m

    Height = 1.000 m height of superstr. plus bearing

    Return wall without pav.cover

    No. = 2

    Breadth = 0.200 m Height of Return wall H1= 0.7

    Length = 6.000 m Height of Return wall H2= 0.4

    Total height of abutment = 4.100 m

    Approach slab

    Length = 5.000 m 5.000

    Breadth = 3.000 m 0.000

    Thickness = 0.200 m

    Foundation is open foundation

    Length = 6.000 m

    Width 2.750 m Heel 1.000 m 0.750

    Toe 1.000 m 0.750

    Height of footing = 0.900 1.250

    Volume = 14.850 m3 W = 356.40 KN

    2.2.1 CALCULATION OF LOAD

    STRESS DUE TO DEAD LOAD

    S.N Elements Unit No. L(m) B(m) H(m) Volume

    Dead Load of Superstructure

    1 Hand rails 6.368 rm 4 8.60 34.40

    2 Railing posts cum 5 0.15 0.15 1.00 0.11

    3 Wearing course cum 1 8.60 3.00 0.07 1.81

    4 Kerbs cum 2 8.60 0.61 0.50 5.27

    5 Deck slab i) rectangle cum 1 8.60 3.00 0.20 5.16

    ii)trapezoid cum 2 8.60 0.30 0.20 1.036 Main Girder i) fillets cum 4 8.60 0.30 0.15 0.77

    ii) webs cum 3 8.60 0.60 0.55 8.51

    7 Internal Cross Girder i) fillets cum 0 2.40 0.15 0.15 0.00

    ii) webs cum 0 2.40 0.60 0.70 0.00

    8 End Cross Girder i) fillets cum 2 2.40 0.15 0.15 0.05

    ii) webs cum 2 2.40 0.60 0.70 2.02

    Total Dead load of the superstructure

    Total DL coming to one abutment =

    3.1

    00

    A

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    25/51

    Dead Load of Abutment

    retaining wall 6.000 0.675 3.100 12.56 24 301.32

    return walls 2 6.000 0.200 0.55 1.32 24 31.68

    ballast wall 6.000 0.200 1.00 1.20 24 28.80

    361.80

    STRESS DUE TO LIVE LOAD

    Live load due to class A loading:

    Maximum load on the given abutment is produced when the train of load is positioned as shown in the figure:

    Axle Load,KN 27 27 114 114 68 68 68 68

    x i , m 8.0 6.8 2.5 -0.5 -3.5 -6.5

    y i 1.0 0.9 0.3 -0.1 -0.4 -0.8

    load, KN 114.0 96.9 21.3 -4.3 -29.8 -55.3

    Maximum total live load = 142.9 KN

    Load due to impact = 142.9 x 0.321 = 45.932 KN

    Live load including impact = 142.9 + 45.932 = 188.8 KN

    Live load due to class AA wheeled loading:

    Axle Load,KN 200 200

    x i , m 19.0 17.8

    y i 2.38 2.23

    load, KN 475.0 445.00

    Maximum total live load = 920.0 KN

    Load due to impact = 920 x 0.18 = 165.6 KN

    Live load including impact = 920.0 + 165.6 = 1085.6 KN

    Live load due to class AA tracked loading:

    Maximum total live load = 542.5 KN

    Load due to impact = 542.5 x 0.1 = 54.25 KNLive load including impact = 542.5 + 54.25 = 596.8 KN

    Out of above three loadings class AA tracked loading gives maximum load to abutment.

    Maximum live load to abutment = 1085.6 KN

    CALCULATIONOF EARTH PRESSURE FOR RETAINING WALL

    Horizontal earth pressure due to backfil

    Corresponding to F = 30 of the backfill material

    g = 18 KN/m3 g ' = 8 KN/m3

    Ka = 0.2973 ( Coulomb's theory applicable )Ep1 = Ko x g h

    2/2 = 45.0 KN/m h = 4.100 m

    Horizontal component of earth pressure = 45.0 cos 20 = 42.3

    which acts at 0.42 x h = 1.72 m from the top of footing base.

    Vertical component of earth pressure = 45.0 x sin 20 =

    which acts at 0.339 m inward from the CG of wall.

    Total Horizontal Thrust, E1 = Ep1 x L = 253.6 KN

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    26/51

    Total Vertical Thrust, E2= Ep2 x L = 92.3 KN

    WEIGHT OF BACKFILL BEHIND THE ABUTMENT

    Wb = 5.6 x 1.000 x 4.1 x 18 = 413.28

    STRESS DUE TO SEISMIC FORCES

    Horizontal Forces due to seismicity are computed using the formula as shown in IS Code 1893 or IRC - 6

    F eq = a x b x l x G

    wher a = 0.08 for the zone V of seismic intensityb = 1.2 for medium soil with isolated footingl = 1 importance factor

    Thus seismic coefficient is taken as 0.096

    a. Seismic force due to Superstructure = 0.096 x 296.058

    height of action of the force = 3.10 + 0.025 +

    = 3.5 m

    b. Seismic force due to Abutment = 0.096 x 362

    act at cg of abutment = 2.05 m

    c. Seismic force due to Back fill = 0.096 x 413.28 =

    acts at cg = 2.05 m

    STRESS DUE TO WATER CURRENT

    Horizontal Thrust due to water current is ignored, because it usually contributes to the stability

    of the wall and the load case with seismic condition does not concide with HFL.

    STRESS DUE TO LONGITUDINAL FORCES

    Due to Tractive Effort or Braking Force

    Braking Force due to Class AA tracked load = @20% of live load/2 =

    = 55.4 KN

    height of the line of action of the brake from the road level = 1.2

    height of the bearing level from the top of base = 3.100 m

    Due to Resistance in Bearing (Temperature)

    Severe moment is produced when the LL is within span. Assume frictional coeff. = 0.225

    The critical case will be when seismic force acts in the direction of traffic. But according to IRC 6-1966 (222.7) "Theload shall not be considered when acting in the direction of traffic,..".

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    27/51

    = 0.2

    Frictional resistance at free bearing = 310.9 KN

    Frictional resistance of fixed bearing = 276.3 KN

    Unbalanced frictional force = 34.5 KN

    Line of action of the force from the bottom of the abutment = 3.100 m

    STRESS DUE TO WIND LOAD

    Exposed height of structure = depth of the beams + thickness of slab +

    + height of kerb =

    = 1.25 m

    Exposed area contributing to wind pressure = 10 m

    Avg. height of superstructure from the bed = 6.000 m

    intensity of wind load = 0.73 KN/m

    velocity of wind = 107 km/hr

    The design is to be conducted for one span only loaded with class A train of vehicle

    Length of Class A train = 20.4 m

    a. Wind Force on Surface (SS) = 0.73 x 10 =

    b. Wind Force on Moving

    vehicle Class A train = 20.4 x 3 =

    acts at 1.5 m above road level = 1.500 m

    Maximum load is obtained in exposed area = 68.5 KN

    For lateral direction

    wind load = 68.5 KN

    acts at = 4.100 m

    SUMMARY OF LOADS FOR DESIGN OF ABUTMENTS

    S.N

    o. Load Vertical (KN) Horizontal (KN)

    Longit. dir Later.

    1 Superstructure

    1.1 Dead load of SS(D) 296.1

    1.2 Live Load of SS (L) including impact 438.0

    Substructure

    2 DL of abutment(E)Retaining wall 301.3

    Return wall - Top section 31.7

    Ballast wall 28.8

    Backfill (BF) 413

    Earth pressure (EP) 413.526

    (EP1) 253.6

    Due to overburden(EP2)

    Taking

    Rankin's

    earth

    pressure

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    28/51

    Frontal passive soil mass (EPp)

    3 Buoyancy (B)

    4 Longitudinal force

    4.1 Tractive force (T) 55.40

    4.2 Due to temperature (F) 34.54

    4.3 Wind Load 68.50

    4.4 Centrifugal force (CF)4.5 Thrust due to water current (WC)

    4.6 Seismic forces (FS)

    on superstructure 14.21 28.42 28.42

    on abutment 17.37 34.73 34.73

    on live load 42.05

    from backfill 19.84 39.675 39.6749

    Load combination Group II (Normal+Temp. condition)

    1096 344 68.5

    Load combination Group IV (for Seismic dry condition)

    D + L + E + Ep1+ Ep2 + T + F + CF + FS 1561 446 144.9

    Note: Moment is taken at the critical section at the bottom of the ABUTMENT

    2.2.2 STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF ABUTMENT RETAINING WALL

    Design of the returning wall will be done based on normal loading condition, but checked on maximum loading

    Design parameters

    Vertical force = 1096 KN

    Long. Moment = 753 KN-m

    Substructures are designed using M20 concrete and Fe415 steel reinforcement

    Parameters for RCC design

    Conccrete M20 sck = 20 N/mm2

    Steel sy = 415 N/mm2Approximate Area of Steel reinforcement required is calculated considering singly reinforced beam theory

    Ast = Mu/ (0.87xy x 0.7984 x d) = 3332 mm2

    Provide 25 mm dia. bars Ast = 490.625 mm2

    Required spacing = 88.3 mm c/c Provide at 100 mm c/c

    Area of reinforcement provided, Ast = 28701.563 mm2

    r = 0.6378125 % > 0.2 %

    At the frontal face, the design moment is greatly reduced because of lack of earth pressure.

    Therefore on this side provide only 50 % of the main reinforcement

    Ast = 3332 x0.5 = 1666 mm2

    coefficient.

    D + L + E + Ep1+ Ep2 + Ep3+ T + F + CF

    (Under combination group IV the permissible increase of

    50%, hence Combination I governs the design longitudina

    moment)

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    29/51

    Provide 20 mm dia. bars Ast = 314 mm2

    Required spacing = 20 113.1 mm c/c Provide at 100 mm c/c

    Area of reinforcement provided, Ast = 18369 mm2

    Same spacing of reinforcement is provided on the side faces of the abutment.

    Distribution re-bar

    Providing 0.12% of cross sectional area = 0.0012 x 750 x 1000= 900

    Provide 12 mm dia. bars Ast = 113.04 mm2

    Required spacing = 251.2 mm c/c Provide at 250 mm c/c

    Check for stresses (For seismic condition) Parameter

    Conccrete M20 sck =

    Normal Thrust , W = 1560553 N Steel sy =

    Bending Moment = ######### N-mm

    Ecentricity, e = 643.948 mm > 165.625 mmbreadth, b = 6000 mm m = 0.0

    Total depth , D = 750 mm

    Effective depth, d = 662.5 mm

    Compressive steel cover, dc = 75 mm Ac = 18369 mm2

    Tensile steel cover, dt = 75 mm At = 28701.56 mm2

    Ast = Mu/ (0.87xy x 0.7984 x 3768.77108 mm2/m

    x= 0.87*y*Ast 189 mm 150 mm say

    0.36*ck*b

    Check for shear stress:

    Critical secion for shear in case of abutment stem is considered at distance d = 662.5 mm from t

    of base slab.

    Horizontal force due to soil pressure = 173.25 KN

    Breaking force = 55.40 KN

    Longitudinal force due to temperature effect = 34.54 KN

    Shear force V = 263.19 KN

    Shear stress tc = V/(b d) = 0.125 N/mm2

    Permissible shear stress without shear reinforcement tcmax =2.8 Mpa for M20 concrete

    Where, As = Area of Steel provided in mm2

    b = width of abutment vertical wall and d = thickness of abutment wall p= 0.21%

    tc = basic values given for different p% of Steel provided = 0.28 Mpa for M20 concr

    From Table 19 of IS 456-200

    The design of ballest wall and return wall will be as in left side abutment.

    A

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    30/51

    2.1.3 DESIGN OF BALLAST WALL

    RCC balast wall (as shown in the figure) monolithic to the abutment has been designed.

    0.20 m

    m

    CALCULATION OF DEAD LOAD STRESSES

    Dead load from the approach slab (triangular portion) = 36 KN= 6 KN/m

    Dead load of the Ballast wall = 28.8 KN

    = 4.8 KN/m

    Earth pressure from the back fill = ca x r x h2 /2 = 3.12 KN/mr = 21 KN/m3ca = 0.2973

    LIVE LOAD STRESS CALCULATION

    Class AA (tr) load component on wall , LL == 291.667 KN

    = 48.611 KN/m

    Add impact to live load @ , I 0.1 = 4.861 KN/m

    e = 0.15 m from axis of ballast wall

    Horizontal Load due to braking of train of vehicle class A vehicle, T =(0.2 ) x(27+114*2) =

    (Front vehicle only considered) =

    Compaction load is maximum at the depth of 1.2m from the top.

    P comp = 25.2 KN/m

    Maximum shear force on section I-IH = T or Pcopm+ Ep = 28.3 KN/mV = DL + LL + I = 64.3 KN/m

    Moment given due to the forces on the critical section I - I at the base of the ballast wall

    M = ( LL + I) x e + T x h + Ep x h /3 == 27.76 KN-m/m

    Area of vertical steel reinforcement required

    1.0

    00

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    31/51

    Ast = Mu/ (0.87xy x 0.7984 x 256.816378 mm2/m

    Provi 12 mm dia bars @ 200 c/c for the continuation of bar from retainin

    Area of steel provided = 565.2 mm2/m

    Provi 12 mm dia bars @ 200 c/c on the opposite face

    Area of steel provided = 565.2 mm2/m

    Horizontal links are provided of 12 mm dia. bars @ 200 c/c

    Stresses at the section,

    Shear stress,tmax = 0.202 N/mm2

    Permissible shear stress without shear reinforcement tcmax = 2.8 N/mm2

    Where, As = Area of Steel provided in mm2

    p= 0.57% 0.57

    tc = basic values given for different p% of Steel provided = 0.51 Mpa for M20 concr

    From Table 19 of IS 456-200

    2.1.4 DESIGN OF RETURN WALLS

    These will be monolithic with the back wall. They are joined together through 300 mm x 300 mm fillets.

    The loads acting on the wing wall (return wall) would be earth pressure and horizontal force to kerb as specified in th

    STRESS DUE TO VERTICAL LOADS

    All the stresses are calculated for the critical section I-I at the bottom face of the abutment

    Dead load of the returnwall = 6.000 x 0.550 x 0.200

    Vert. LL from Class A load = 168.72 KN 56.24 KN/m

    Add Impact due to LL @ 0.25= 42.18 KN 14.06 KN/m

    STRESSES DUE TO HORIZONTAL FORCES

    Horizontal Thrust due to DL+LL+IL=q*L*ka = 24.070 KN/m

    acts at h/2 0.28 m from the top of foundation

    Moment due to hor. component of vertical loads = 433.2636 KN-m/r.m

    Earth pressure from the backfill = ka x rs x h^2/2 = 0.94

    Moment due to earth pressure = 16.998 KN-m

    Momt due to later. force = 7.5 KN/m for the curb as per code = 135.000 KN-m

    Total horz. uniformly distributed load = 24.07 + 0.94 + 7.5

    Total Moment = 433.26 + 17.00 + 135.000 = 585.26

    depth required = M /( 0.138ck b ) = 620.925 mmwhere b = ( 700 + 400 ) / 2 = 550 mm

    Provide overall depth = 650 mm

    Ast = Mu/ (0.87xy x 0.7984 x 3530.97 mm2/m

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    32/51

    Tensile steel re-bar equired = 3530.97 mm2

    Provide 25 mm dia. bars Ast = 490.87 mm2

    Required spacing = 139.0 mm c/c Provide at 150 mm c/c

    2.2.3 DESIGN OF FOUNDATION

    Foundation is designed as open foundation of the rectangular shape

    Length = 6.00 m

    Breadth = 2.75 m heel 1.000 m

    toe 1.000 m

    width of abutment 0.750 m

    Height = 0.9 m

    Concrete cover 75 mm

    DEAD LOAD due to foundation = 356.4 KN

    CALCULATIONOF EARTH PRESSURE FOR FOUNDATION

    Horizontal earth pressure due to backfill

    Ka = 0.2973 As calculated earlier for abutment stem. ( Coulomb's theory applicable

    Ep1 = Ka x g h2

    /2 = 66.90 KN/m h = 5.000 m

    Horizontal component of earth pressure = 66.9 x cos 20 =

    which acts at 0.42 x h = 2.10 m from the bottom of footing base.

    Pressure due to surcharge: As approach slab has been provided no surcharge load is to be taken as per code.

    WEIGHT OF BACKFILL BEHIND THE ABUTMENT

    Wb = 6.000 x 1.000 x 4.100 x 18.00 = 442.8

    Wf = 6.000 x 1.000 x 0 x 18.00 = 0.0

    acts at 0.875 m from centre of abutment

    Seismic force due to Foundation = 0.096 x 356.4

    act at cg of abutment = 0.45 m

    Seismic force due to back fill = 0.096 x 442.8

    act at cg of backfill = 2.95 m from the b

    SUMMARY OF LOADS FOR DESIGN OF FOUNDATION.

    . Load Vertical (KN) Horiz L. arm

    (KN) (m)

    1 Superstructure

    1.1 Dead load of SS(D) 296.06 1.2

    1.2 Live Load on SS including impact (L) 438.0 1.2

    Substructure

    2 DL of abutment(E)

    Retaining wall 301.32 1.4

    Return wall 31.68 3.7

    Ballast wall 28.80 1.4

    Backfill (BF) 442.80 2.25

    Backfill (FR)

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    33/51

    Earth pressure (EP)

    Triangular dry(EP1) 377.2 -2.1

    Due to overburden(EP2) 0.00

    Frontal passive soil mass (EPp)

    DL of foundation 356.40 1.4

    3 Buoyancy (B)

    4 Longitudinal force

    4.1 Breaking (breaking) force (T) 55.40 -4.0

    4.2 Due to temperature (F) 34.54 -4.0

    4.3 Wind Load

    4.4 Centrifugal force (CF)

    4.5 Thrust due to water current (WC)

    4.6 Seismic forces (FS)

    on superstructure 14.21 28.4 -3.5

    on abutment 17.37 34.7 -2.1

    on live load

    on foundation 17.11 34.2 -0.5

    from backfill 21.25 42.5 -3.0

    Load combination Group I (N+T condition)

    D + L + I + E + Ep1+ Ep2 +BF+ T + F + CF 1895.1 467

    Load combination Group IV (for Seismic dry condition)

    D + L + E + Ep1+ Ep2 +BF+ T + F + CF + FS 1965.0 607

    Note: Moment is taken about the toe for check against overturning .

    For Normal condition For Seismic conditi

    P = 1895 KN P = 1965

    Mnet = Mr-Mo= 1797.12344 Mnet = Mr-Mo=

    x = Mnet/P= 0.94832107 x = Mnet/P=e = b/2-x'= 0.42667893 ok e = b/2-x'=

    Pmax=P/A*(1+6*e/b) = 221.772 KN/m2 Pmax=P/A*(1+6*e/

    Pmin=P/A*(1-6*e/b) = 7.932 KN/m2 Pmin=P/A*(1-6*e/b

    Where, A=b x d = 16.5 m2

    CHECK AGAINST OVERTURNING

    Case: Normal

    Factor of Safety against overturning =Mres/Mov= 2948.9419 / 1151.8 =

    Case: Seismic

    Factor of Safety against overturning =Mres/Mov= 2948.9419 / 1086 =

    CHECK AGAINST SLIDING

    Case : NormalThe minimum vertical force will be when there is no live load and the front backfill is washed out =

    The resisting force againest sliding = (vertical force) x (coefficient of friction b/w concrete and soil)

    = 1457.06 x 0.45 = 655.676

    The sliding force is the horizontal forces = 411.71 KN

    Hence, Factor of Safety against sliding =Pres/Psl= 655.68 / 411.7 =

    ( f = 0.45 soil/concr

    Case: Seismic

    The minimum vertical force will be when there is no live load and the front backfill is washed out =

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    34/51

    The resisting force againest sliding = (vertical force) x (coefficient of friction b/w concrete and soil)

    = 1527.00 x 0.45 = 687.149

    The sliding force is the horizontal forces = 551.59 KN

    Hence, Factor of Safety against sliding =Pres/Psl= 687.15 / 551.6 =

    STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF FOUNDATION

    Design of toe slab:

    Wt of toe slab = 21.6 KN/m2 144.012 85.692

    1.000 m 0.750 m

    2.75 m

    Pressure distribution diagram

    concrete grede :

    Steel grade :

    Moment about EF = 87.13 KN-m

    d= M /( 0.138 107.1 mmAdopt D = 600 mm

    d = 500 mm

    Ast = Mu/ (0.87xy x 0.7 604 mm2 Minimum reinforc. as per cod

    Using 16 mm dia bar, spacing = 201.1 mm

    Adopt 16 mm dia bar, spacing = 150 mm c/c Area of r

    Check for shear stress:In toe critical section for shear is considered at a distance d = 500

    from abutment stem.

    Shear force at critical section V = 542.20 KN b= 6.00 m #####

    161.3

    Shear stress = V/(b d) = 0.181 N/mm2

    Permissible shear stress without shear reinforcement tcmax =2.8 Mpa for M20 concrete

    Where, k1 = 1.14 - 0.7 d >= 0.5 ( d in m ) 0.5 m

    Where, As = Area of Steel provided in mm2

    b = width of abutment vertical wall and d = thickness of abutment wall p= 0.037%

    tc = basic values given for different p% of Steel provided = 0.280 N/mm2 >From Table 19 of IS 456-200 ok. Shear re-bar is not necessary.

    200.1

    7

    KN/m2

    221.7

    7

    ####

    A

    DE

    F G

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    35/51

    Design of heel slab:

    Upward pressure on the heel slab varies from 7.93215698 Kn/m2 to 85.69 Kn/m2

    In addition to the upward pressure the heel slab is subjected to downward pressure due to the self weight of heel

    slab and weight of earth fill on heel slab:

    Down pressure due to self weight = 14.4 KN/m2

    Down pressure due to backfill = 73.8 KN/m288.2 KN/m2 3

    Net down pressure = 80 KN/m2 max

    3 KN/m2 min 1.000 m

    Moment about DG= 27.174 KN-m

    d= M /( 0.138ck b ) 99.225 mmAdopt D = 600 mm

    d = 500 mm

    Ast = Mu/ (0.87xy x 0.7984 x d) = 189 mm2 Minimum reinforc. as per code =

    Using 16 mm dia bar, specing = 201 mm

    Adopt 16 mm dia bar, specing = 150 mm c/c Area of re-bar pro

    Distribution re-bar0.12/100 x 900 = 1080 mm2/runnig meter

    Using 12 mm dia bar, specing = 209.3 mm

    Adopt 12 mm dia bar, specing = 200 mm c/c at top and bottom

    Check for shear stress:

    Since the load on the heel is predominantly downward, it induces tensile reactio at its junction with stem.

    Hence the critical section for shear for the heel slab is considered at the face of support.

    Shear force V = 248.3274 KN b = 6.00 m

    Shear stress = V/(b d) = 0.083 N/mm2

    Permissible shear stress without shear reinforcement tcmax =2.8N/mm

    2

    Mpa for M20 concreteWhere, k1 = 1.14 - 0.7 d >= 0.5 ( d in m )

    Where, As = Area of Steel provided in mm2

    b = width of abutment vertical wall and d = thickness of abutment wall p= 0.037%

    tc = basic values given for different p% of Steel provided =

    From Table 19 of IS 456-200 0.28 N/mm2 >

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    36/51

    ss of data

    8.000 m

    3.000 m

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    37/51

    0.000

    5.000 ######

    Unit Wt Total e from c/c

    0.06 2.06

    24 2.70

    22 39.73

    24 126.42

    24 123.84

    24 24.7724 18.58

    24 204.34

    24 0.00

    24 0.00

    24 1.30

    24 48.38

    592.12

    296.1 KN

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    38/51

    0.000 m

    2.338 m

    0.238 m

    i

    Ws

    b b

    Coulomb

    i F b d

    0 30 90 20

    h = 30 Let us find out which theory is appl

    a = 60 1.7321 m < 4.100 m henceKa=

    KN/m Coul. 0.75 0.9397 2.6845 0.2973

    Rankin 1 0.75 0.5 1.5 0.3333

    15.384 KN/m

    Hor pressure from Rankin's theory = 50.43 KN/m

    Horizontal thrust = 302.6 acts at 1.37 m from the top of foundation footin

    Weight of soil is not

    to be considered in

    Coulumb's Theroy.

    90-bd

    Pa

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    39/51

    KN

    = 28.42 KN

    0.75 / 2 =

    = 34.73 KN

    39.675 KN

    1/2 to one abutment

    m

    in free bearing

    seismic force due to live

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    40/51

    in other bearing

    7.3 KN

    61.2 KN

    Arm Moment (KN)

    (m) Longit. Later.

    0.16 47.7

    0.16 70.6

    0.00

    -2.34 -74.1

    -0.24 -6.8

    0.00 0.0

    1.72 436.7

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    41/51

    3.10 171.7

    3.10 107.1

    4.10 280.85

    3.50 99.5 99.47549

    2.05 71.2 71.20224

    5.60 235.4688

    2.05 81.3 81.3335

    752.9 280.9

    1004.9 487.5

    Decrease spacing !

    stress is

    l

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    42/51

    ok

    mm2

    at both faces. ok

    for RCC design

    20 N/mm2

    415 N/mm2

    he junction

    > 0.125 N/mm2

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    43/51

    51.0 KN

    8.5 KN/m

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    44/51

    wall

    > 0.202 N/mm2

    ok

    code.

    x 24 = 15.84 KN

    = 2.64 KN/m

    KN/m

    = 32.51 KN/m

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    45/51

    Decrease specing !

    )

    62.8613 KN/m

    KN

    KN

    = 34.214 KN

    = 42.509 KN

    ottom of foundation base

    M[r] M(o)

    KN-m KN-m

    359.382

    531.683

    414.315

    117.612

    39.6

    996.3

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    46/51

    -792.1

    0

    490.05

    -221.6

    -138.2

    -49.74

    -35.6

    0

    -7.698

    -62.7

    2948.94 -1152

    2949 -1086

    114.85

    n

    KN

    1862.99 KN-m

    0.94809 m0.43 ok

    b) = 230.02 KN/m2

    ) = 8.1638 KN/m2

    2.6 > 2.0 Safe

    2.7 >1.5 Safe

    ###### KN

    KN

    1.593 >1.5 Hence Safe

    te)

    ######

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    47/51

    KN

    1.246 >1.25 Hence Safe

    1.000 m

    M 20

    Fe 415

    87.1259

    = 1000 mm2

    -bar provided = 1339.733

    mm2

    122.4

    0.04

    0.181 N/mm2

    7.9

    B

    C

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    48/51

    80

    1000 mm2

    vided = 1339.7 mm2

    0.04

    0.0828 N/mm2

    ok

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    49/51

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    50/51

  • 8/3/2019 Design of Abutment Bridge

    51/51

    i

    Rankin

    a

    icable:

    Coulomb's theory applicable

    Weight of soil is also to

    be considered in Rankin's

    Theroy.

    i

    Pa