Upload
jim-lee-climateviewer
View
221
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/30/2019 Design of Aircraft Trajectories Based on Trade-Offs Between Emission Sources 6-3-11
1/21
Design of Aircraft Trajectories based on Trade-offs
between Emission Sources
Banavar Sridhar and Neil Chen
NASA Ames Research CenterMoffett Field, CA, USA
USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar
Berlin, Germany
June 13-16, 2011
Hok Ng
University of California,
Santa Cruz, CA, USA
Florian Linke
DLR-German Aerospace
Center, Hamburg, Germany
7/30/2019 Design of Aircraft Trajectories Based on Trade-Offs Between Emission Sources 6-3-11
2/21
Impact of Aviation on Climate Change*
Increased urgency to deal with factors affecting climatechange
Climatic changes include Direct emissions: CO2 , Water vapor and other greenhouse
gasses (GHG) (best understood)
Indirect effects: NOx affecting distributions of Ozone andMethane (Ozone and Methane effects have opposite signs)
Effects associated with contrails and cirrus cloud formation Aviation responsible for 2% of all anthropogenic CO2
emissions Large uncertainty in the understanding of the impact of
aviation on climate change*Workshop on the Impacts of Aviation on Climate Change, June 7-9, 2006, Boston, MA.
2
7/30/2019 Design of Aircraft Trajectories Based on Trade-Offs Between Emission Sources 6-3-11
3/21
Research Projects
NASA/FAA research on understanding the atmosphericphysics and chemistry and weather forecasting
FAA environmental tool development Environmentally Responsible Aviation (ERA)
Vehicle concepts and enabling technologies that will reduce theimpact of aviation on the environment
Research in Europe Climate compatible Air Transport System (CATS)
Research limited to Modeling, data analysis andoperational concepts
Inclusion of environmental factors based on climate scienceresearch and ERA technologies in airspace simulations to
evaluate alternate concepts and policies
3
7/30/2019 Design of Aircraft Trajectories Based on Trade-Offs Between Emission Sources 6-3-11
4/21
Outline
Modeling approach Persistent contrails formation model Aircraft fuel burn model Wind optimal contrails avoidance aircraft trajectories Tradeoff between persistent contrails mitigation and
extra fuel burn
Concluding remarks
4
7/30/2019 Design of Aircraft Trajectories Based on Trade-Offs Between Emission Sources 6-3-11
5/21
Approach
Flight
Schedules
Atmospheric
and Air SpaceData
Future ATM
Concepts
Evaluation
Tool
(FACET)
Visualization
andAnalysis of
Aircraft
Operations
Application Programming Interface
Optimization Algorithms
- System level- Aircraft level
Emission
Models andMetrics
Contrail
Models
5
5
7/30/2019 Design of Aircraft Trajectories Based on Trade-Offs Between Emission Sources 6-3-11
6/21
Contrails
Aircraft condensation trails occur whenwarm engine exhaust gases and cold
ambient air interact
Contrails form when Relative Humiditywith respect to Water (RHW) >
Temperature dependent threshold
Persist when Relative Humidity withrespect to Ice (RHI) >100%
Contribution of contrails to globalwarming may be larger than contribution
from CO2 emissions
6
http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v1/n1/full/nclimate1078.html
7/30/2019 Design of Aircraft Trajectories Based on Trade-Offs Between Emission Sources 6-3-11
7/21
Persistent Contrail Formation Model
Persistent Contrail
Rhi>100%
Aircraft
RHW Contours RHI Contours
RHI>100% Contours 7
7/30/2019 Design of Aircraft Trajectories Based on Trade-Offs Between Emission Sources 6-3-11
8/21
8
Fuel Consumption Model (BADA)
Eurocontrols Base of Aircraft DAta (BADA) Fuel burn during cruise:fc = t SFCTh
Fuel burn for a typical jet from Chicago to Newark
Fuel burn in kg
Altitude in 100 ft
7/30/2019 Design of Aircraft Trajectories Based on Trade-Offs Between Emission Sources 6-3-11
9/21
9
Emission Models(Systems for Assessing Aviations Global Emissions)
e(CO2) = 3155
e(H2O) =1237
e(SO2) = 0.8
e(HC) = EIHC
e(CO) = EICO
e(NOx) = EINO
x
Fuel and emission models undergoing additional verification usingAviation Environmental Design Tool (AEDT)
Collaboration with Volpe National Transportation Systems Center
7/30/2019 Design of Aircraft Trajectories Based on Trade-Offs Between Emission Sources 6-3-11
10/21
Find the optimal trajectory given the arrival and departure airports,cruise speed and winds subject to environmental constraints
Optimization performed in the horizontal plane for different cruisealtitudes
Aircraft equations of motion in the horizontal plane are
Optimal Aircraft Trajectories
x = Vcos+ u(x,y)
y = Vsin+ v(x,y) subject to
Th =D
L =W
m = f
10
7/30/2019 Design of Aircraft Trajectories Based on Trade-Offs Between Emission Sources 6-3-11
11/21
Optimization Subject to
Environmental Constraints
Optimize horizontal trajectory by determining the headingangle that minimizes the cost function
Solution reduces to solvingJ=1/2X
T(tf )MX(tf ) + [Ct
t0
tf
+Cf f +Cr r (x,y)]dt
x = Vcos+ u(x,y)
y = Vsin+ v(x,y)
= (V+ u(x,y) cos+ v(x,y)sin)(Ct+Cf f+Crr(x,y)) (
Cr sin
r(x,y)
x+
Cr cos
r(x,y)
y )
+ sin2(
v(x,y)
x)+ sin cos(
u(x,y)
xv(x,y)
y) cos
2(
u(x,y)
y)
11
Time cost
Fuel cost
Contrails penalty cost
7/30/2019 Design of Aircraft Trajectories Based on Trade-Offs Between Emission Sources 6-3-11
12/21
Contrail Reducing Aircraft Trajectories
Wind Optimal
Complete ContrailReduction
Partial Contrail
Reduction
12
7/30/2019 Design of Aircraft Trajectories Based on Trade-Offs Between Emission Sources 6-3-11
13/21
Tradeoff between Contrail Reduction and
Extra Fuel Consumption
JFK/LAX (2D)
LAX/JFK (2D)
LAX/JFK (3D)
JFK/LAX (3D)
13
7/30/2019 Design of Aircraft Trajectories Based on Trade-Offs Between Emission Sources 6-3-11
14/21
Optimal Trajectories for 12 City Pairs
14
Persistent contrails
at 33,000 ft
7/30/2019 Design of Aircraft Trajectories Based on Trade-Offs Between Emission Sources 6-3-11
15/21
Results for 12 City-pairs
15
One days simulation is just the beginning!
Total (2D)
Total (3D)
7/30/2019 Design of Aircraft Trajectories Based on Trade-Offs Between Emission Sources 6-3-11
16/21
Climate Impact of Emissions
16
7/30/2019 Design of Aircraft Trajectories Based on Trade-Offs Between Emission Sources 6-3-11
17/21
Uncertainty Quantification
Each trade-off curve requires approximately 73,000simulations
Some of the uncertainties Daily variation of traffic and atmospheric conditions Aircraft parameters: Thrust, Weights (variation of 15%), Fuelflow Atmospheric parameters: Relative humidity, Winds Quantity, location and lifetime of emission Climate impact (Radiative Forcing) of emission Emission Goals (10/20/50/100 years, Carbon neutral/reduce) How much can we afford?
Magnitude of uncertainty and importance to decision-making
17
7/30/2019 Design of Aircraft Trajectories Based on Trade-Offs Between Emission Sources 6-3-11
18/21
Daily variations in the trade-off of emissions
18
2D
3D
May 27
May 4
May 24
7/30/2019 Design of Aircraft Trajectories Based on Trade-Offs Between Emission Sources 6-3-11
19/21
Variation in Contrail Regions due to
Uncertainty in RHW Measurements
19
7/30/2019 Design of Aircraft Trajectories Based on Trade-Offs Between Emission Sources 6-3-11
20/21
Effect of RHW Uncertainty on Emission
Tradeoff
20
10%
5%
2%
Nominal
2D
3D
7/30/2019 Design of Aircraft Trajectories Based on Trade-Offs Between Emission Sources 6-3-11
21/21
Concluding Remarks
Presented research on environmentally friendlyen route traffic flow concepts incorporatingmodels developed by basic climate research
Developed an optimal contrail reduction trajectoryconcept
Investigated the tradeoff between persistent contrailsformation and additional fuel burn
When altitude and route are optimized, a small increase(2%) in total fuel consumption can significantly (30 to
60%) reduce the total travel times through contrail regions
Developed capability to conduct system levelanalysis of Traffic Flow Management concepts
with environmental impact
21