Design of compression members-3

  • Upload
    eseem

  • View
    219

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    1/62

    Chapter 03 C

    Design of CompressionMembers

    1 5/9/16

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    2/62

    Example 3.1

    Design a truss compression member

    using the following three given cross-sectional shapes

    1! "#s with 10 mm thic$ gusset plate an%

    snug tight bolte% sta& plates!"! 'ingle angle connecte% through longer

    leg!

    3! (-section! )he other %ata is as un%er

    *D + 110 $, *# + 1.0 $,

    # + 3!. m 36 'teel" 5/9/16

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    3/62

    Solution:

    or truss members 2+1

    #u+# as there is no bracing betweenthe oints

    *u+ 1!"*D 41!6*#

    *u+ 1!" 110 41!6 1.0 + 356 $,

    1- Double Angles

    3 5/9/16

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    4/62

    5/9/16 .

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    5/62

    ! )he section will be economical if it has nearl&same slen%erness ratio in both %irections! )hismeans that r  an% r&  shoul% be nearl& same

    as the length for both %irections is e7ual8!

    ! )he ra%ius of g&ration r for the %ouble

    section will be same as that for a single

    section!C! )he ra%ius of g&ration r& for the %ouble

    section will be consi%erabl& higher than for asingle section!

    D! rom the above facts it is clear that to ma$e r same in both %irections une7ual leg anglesare to be use% with their longer legs

    connecte% together!5 5/9/16

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    6/62

    :!  )he proecting leg shoul% be relativel&smaller!

    *u + 356 $, KLu + 3!. m

    ;ass + 90

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    7/62

     Areq for single ngle + 1"16 mm"

    sel = re7

    'elect section Minimum weight section

    b > bmin

    bmin  + 3!"5% 4"6

    + ?5 mm assuming % + 15 mm8

    #/.0+ @5 mm not full& applicable here8

    ? 5/9/16

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    8/62

    DiAerent options available are

    1! "# @9 @9 ?!9 + "?00 mm"

    "! "# 10" ?6 ?!9 + "?00 mm"

    3! "# 10" ?6 9!5 + 3"00 mm"

    ,ote n&one out of the Brst two optionsma& be trie% Brst! owevercalculations show that these sections

    are not sucient with onl& the thir%section closer to the re7uirements! )henumber of trials ma& be re%uce% b&

    using the column selection tables!@ 5/9/16

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    9/62

    Esing the %ouble angles selectiontables of Design i%s for *u+ 356 $,

    2 5#5  + 2 &  + 3!. m an% sta& plateswith full& tensione% bolts followingoptions are available

    9 5/9/16

    'ection

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    10/62

    Esing the %ouble angles selectiontables of Design i%s for *u+ 356 $,

    2 5#5  + 2 &  + 3!. m an% sta& plateswith full& tensione% bolts followingoptions are available

    10 5/9/16

    'ection

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    11/62

    5/9/1611

    1

    1

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    12/62

    5/9/161"

    1

    1

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    13/62

    ence $eeping in view the above valuesfor full& tight sta& plates trial section for

    snug tight sta& plates ma& be "#s 10" ?6 9!5! owever consi%ering snug tightsta& plates "#s  10" @9 9!5 ma&

    ultimatel& be the Bnal result!

     )rial 'ection1 "# 10" ?6 9!5 + " 1600 mm"

    #ong legs bac$-to-bac$ connecte% to the

    gusset plate!

    b + 10" mm F bmin  G2 

    #onger leg is connecte%!13 5/9/16

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    14/62

      G2 

    r5 + 3"!0 mm as for single angle

    Esing Design i%s

    b + " ?6 4 10 + 16" mm

    r&8appr + b0!19 4s/1"?08

    + 16" 0!19 4 10/1"?08 + 3"!06mm

    1. 5/9/16

    7.12 7.1050.9

    102=

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    15/62

    15 5/9/16

    1070.32

    34001≅

    ×=

     x

    ux x

     L K 

    05.10606.32

    34001≅

    ×=

     y

    uy y

     L K 

    lthough r5 is lesser than r& the columnma& buc$le about &-ais  if mo%iBe%slen%erness ratio in &-%irection ecee%s

    2 5#u5/r5!

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    16/62

    ssume that snug tight bolts connect

    sta& plates an% gusset plates!Esing ?5 mm long sta& plates an%treating HaI as the clear %istance

    between the sta& plates an%/or gussetplates the c/c spacing of sta& plateswill be a4?5 mm!

    16 5/9/16

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    17/62

    'election of 'ta& *lates 'pacing

    a/ri  + 0!?5 larger of 2 5#u5/r5 J 2 u&/r&

    + 0!?5 10?8 + @0!"5ri + rK + 16!. mm

    ama5 + @0!"5 16!./1000

    + 1!316 m

    or ?5 mm long sta& plates

    ,umber of spaces between sta& plates +3.00/13164?58

    + "!.5 sa& 3 spaces8

    1? 5/9/16

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    18/62

    ,umber of sta& plates + "

    a + 3.00/38-?5 + 105@ mm

    Note: Number of stay plates may notgenerally exceed three.

    a/ri + 105@/16!. + 6.!53

    or snug tight plates

    1@ 5/9/16

    12553.6405.106 22

    ≅+=   

     

     

     

    m y

    uy y

     L K 

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    19/62

    ; + larger of 2 5#u5/r5 J mo%iBe% 2 u&/r& 

    + 1"5

    Maimum 'len%erness ;atio Chec$

    ; L "00 G2 

    Capacit& Chec$

    rom table of Design i%s

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    20/62

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    21/62

      G2 

    r5 + 31!@ mm as for single angle

    Esing Design i%s

    b + " @9 4 10 + 1@@ mm

    r&8appr + b0!19 4s/1"?08

    + 1@@ 0!19 4 10/1"?08 + 3?!"mm

    :act calculation for r&  to be ma%e onl&

    for the last trial8"1 5/9/16

    7.12 7.1050.9

    102=

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    22/62

    "" 5/9/16

    [ ]

    ( )   mmr 

    mm I 

    exact  y

     y

    7.3917202

    103.541

    103.541)53.24(1720101232

    4

    4424

    =× ×=

    ×=+×+××=

    1078.31

    34001 ≅×= x

    ux x

    r  L K 

    64.857.3934001 ≅×=

     y

    uy y

    r  L K 

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    23/62

    Esing ?5 mm long sta& plates an%treating HaI as the clear %istance

    between the sta& plates an%/or gussetplates the c/c spacing of sta& plateswill be a4?5 mm!

    "3 5/9/16

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    24/62

    'election of 'ta& *lates 'pacing

    a/ri  + 0!?5 larger of 2 5#u5/r5 J 2 u&/r&

    + 0!?5 10?8 + @0!"5ri + rK + 1@!5 mm

    ama5 + @0!"5 1@!5/1000

    + 1!.@5 m

    or ?5 mm long sta& plates

    ,umber of spaces between sta& plates +3.00/1.@54?58

    + "!1@ sa& 3 spaces8

    ". 5/9/16

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    25/62

    ,umber of sta& plates + "

    a + 3.00/38-?5 + 105@ mm

    a/ri + 105@/1@!5 + 5?!19

    or snug tight plates

    "5 5/9/16

    10319.5764.85 22 ≅+=   

      

     

    m y

    uy y

     L K 

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    26/62

    or full& tightene% bolts or wel%sappropriate formula for the mo%iBe%

    slen%erness ratio must be use%!; + larger of 2 #u/r J mo%iBe% 2 u&/r& +

    10?

    Maimum 'len%erness ;atio Chec$

    ; L "00 G2 

    Capacit& Chec$

    rom table of Design i%s

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    27/62

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    28/62

    2- Single Angle !onnecte" #$%oug$ Longe%Leg

    Ot is almost impossible to loa% such members

    concentricall& %ue to the fact that onl& one

    leg is generall& connecte% with the gusset

    plate!

     )heoreticall& concentric loa%ing coul% onl& beapplie% b& milling the en%s of an angle an%

    loa%ing it through bearing plates igure

    3!"08!

    On practice the actual eccentricit& of loa%ing

    is relativel& large an% neglecting it in %esign

    ma& lea% to a %angerousl& un%er-%esigne%

    member!"@ 5/9/16

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    29/62

    urther single angle can un%ergo lateraltorsional buc$ling!

    'eparate O'C provisions are applicablefor such %esign!

     )he proce%ure use% in this eample isapplicable for single angles with

    eccentricit& epecte% in a planar truss! :7ual leg angles are generall& preferre%

    for single angle columns in case the two

    eAective lengths 2 # an% 2 & are e7ual! owever une7ual leg angles ma& also be

    use% if the resulting section comes out to

    be economical!"9 5/9/16

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    30/62

    5/9/1630

     )he selection can also be ma%e usingthe single angle section column

    selection tables!

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    31/62

    *u + 356 $,

    ;ass + 1"5

     

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    32/62

    sel = re7

    'elect section Minimum weight sectionb > bmin + ?5 mm

    :7ual legs will be preferre% as 2 #  an%

    2 & are e7ual! )rial 'ection

    # 15" 15" 1"!?0 rK  + 30 mm r& +

    .?!" mm + 3?10 mm"

    b + 15" F bmin  G$3" 5/9/16

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    33/62

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    34/62

    3. 5/9/16

     MPa F cr c  98.96=φ 

    Ok  kN356kN80.3591000371098.96   A F   sel cr c   >=×=φ 

    #oa%ing c&cles are lesser than "0000!

    inal 'election L 12 x 12 x 12.&

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    35/62

    3 '-Section

    *u + 356 $,

    ;ass + 90

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    36/62

    sel = re7

    'elect section Minimum weightsection

    b > bmin + ?5 mm

    % L 360mm

    Esing the (-shape selection table of

    Design i%s for *u + 356 $, 2 & + 3!.

    m following option is obtaine% giving

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    37/62

    #%ial Section: ' 10 x 22.

    2 &8e7 + 3!./1!?5 + 1!9. m not critical8

    r5 + 65 r& + 3?!1 mm + "@60 mm"

    3? 5/9/16

    Ok  762

    152

    2 minbmm

    b f 

    >==

    Ok  15.8 5.112

    r  =

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    38/62

    Final Section: ' 10 x 22.

    3@ 5/9/16

     MPa F cr c  66.143=φ 

    Ok  3564111000286066.143   kN kN  A F   sel cr c   >=×=φ 

    Ok  002 921.37

    3400

    min

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    39/62

    :ample 3!" (embe%s un"e% St%ess)e*e%sal

    Design a bri%ge truss compressionmember 2+18 that is 3!5m long!

    *D+ @0 $, C8

    *#+ "?0 $, C8 )#+ "?0 $, )8!

    'elect following two t&pes of sections

    i8 "#s with 15 mm thic$ gusset platewel%e% connections but snug bolte%sta& plates!

    ii8 (-section wel%e% connections!39 5/9/16

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    40/62

    'olution 

    *u+ 1!"*D  4 1!6*# + 1!" @0 4 1!6

    "?0 + 5"@ $, )u+-1!"*D  4 1!6)# +-1!" @0 4 1!6

    "?0 + 336 $,

    *u F )u Design as compression

    member for *u  an% then chec$ as

    tension member for )u!

    .0 5/9/16

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    41/62

      !omplete t$e Example

     +ou%sel, 

    .1 5/9/16

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    42/62

    EAL S#)E/# !L(/

    :7ual strength column is %eBne% as a

    column having same critical buc$lingstrength along both strong an% wea$aes!

    On other wor%s for an e7ual strengthcolumn 2#/r ratio along both the aesshoul% approimatel& be the same!

     )he material of the column is use%more ecientl& if this criterion issatisBe% which results in the moreeconomical column %esign!

    ." 5/9/16

    LK

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    43/62

    or an e7ual strength column ratio of

    ra%ii of g&ration in the two %irectionsshoul% be e7ual to the ratio of eAectivelength in the two %irections!

    racing is provi%e% in such a wa& that the

    above e7uation is approimatel& satisBe%!

     )he ratio r/r&  is the main criterion for

    %esign of bracing!

    .3 5/9/16

     y y

     x x

     y

     x

     y

     y y

     x

     x x

     L K 

     L K 

     L K 

     L K 

    =

    =

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    44/62

    2nowing 2 # an% r/r& ratio the re7uire%

    eAective un-brace% length along &-ais

    ma& be %etermine% as follows

    ase% on the above information the#;D 'peciBcations provi%es a metho%with which a (-section can be selecte%from the column selection tables withlittle trial an% error when the un-brace%lengths in the two %irections are$nown/%eci%e% earlier!

    .. 5/9/16

     y x

     x x y y

    r r 

     L K  L K    =

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    45/62

     )he %esigner enters the appropriatetable with 2 & selects a section ta$es

    the r5/r&  value given at the bottom ofthe table for that shape an% calculates2 &8e7 as follows

    Of 2 &8e7  is greater than 2 & buc$ling

    is epecte% about -ais an% the%esigner will re-enter the table with2 &8e7  an% will select the Bnal

    selection!.5 5/9/16

    ( ) y x

     x x

    eq y y

    r r 

     L K  L K    =

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    46/62

    Example 3.3

    9 m long column in a frame structure

    is to resist an aial factore%compressive loa% of 1600 $,! ssumethe bottom en% of the column to bepinne% an% the top en% to be Be% inboth %irections!  )he column is brace%at its thir% points along wea$ ais!

    ssume that there is no si%eswa&between the top an% bottom points!Design a wi%e Pange section using 36steel an% O'C 'peciBcations!

    .6 5/9/16

    S l ti

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    47/62

    Solution:

    uc$ling of the column withbraces results in rotation of

    the main member at thebrace points an% lateralbracing %oes not prevent thisrotation!

    ence brace point ma& beconsi%ere% ust li$e a hingefor that %irection igure3!""8!

    owever lateral translationor swa& of the brace point isalmost Kero!

    .? 5/9/16

    igure 3!"" uc$ling ofColumn along wea$ ais

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    48/62

    5/9/16.@

    #/3

    a8 )op alf Column uc$les in (ea$ Direction

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    49/62

    5/9/16.9

    #/3

    a8 )op alf Column uc$les in (ea$ Direction

    #/3

    8 Mi%%le J ottom Column uc$ling in (ea$ Direction

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    50/62

    5/9/1650

    #u+ 9 m

    c8 Column uc$ling in Maor is Direction

    :Aective #engths for uc$ling of Column

    * 1600 $,

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    51/62

    *u + 1600 $,

    ;ass + 90

     

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    52/62

    urther O'C 'peciBcationsrecommen%s 2 + 1!0 for brace%

    columns!2 5 + 0!@ Bgure 3!"3c8 Ese 2 5 + 1!0

    2 u&  + 1!0 9/3 + 3!0 m2 5#5 + 1!0 9 + 9!0 m

    ence r5/r&  of the selecte% section

    closer to 3!0 will be preferre%!5" 5/9/16

    33

    9

    == y y x x

     L K 

     L K 

    ll i ti il bl

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    53/62

    ollowing options are available

    1! ( 360?" + 9100 mm" r/r& + 3!06

    "! ( 36091 + 11500 mm" r/r& + "!..3! ( 310@6 + 11000 mm" r/r& + "!10

    .! ( 3109? + 1"3"3 mm" r/r& + 1!?5

    5! ( "00@6 + 11000 mm" r/r& + 1!?. )he Brst option has area less than theassume% re7uire% value but r/r& is close

    to 3!0! )his ma& be trie% as Brst option! )heother options although have greater

    area ma& fail!53 5/9/16

    ) i l ' ti ( 360 ?"

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    54/62

     )rial 'ection ( 360?"

    + 9100 mm"  r5+ 1.9 mm r&+ .@!5

    mm

    5. 5/9/16

    Ok t 

    b

     f 

     f  15.8 7.6

    2r  =

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    55/62

    ,ote In this example area of qualifying example

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    56/62

    ,ote In this example, area of qualifying examplesection is lesser than the assumed requiredarea. his is only because of selecting the

    equal strength column. !urther, by using thecolumn selection tables, the criterion of equalstrength is automatically satis"ed.

    Example 3.4:

    Design a (-section column in a buil%ing frameof .m stor& height for an aial factore%compressive loa% of 9?5 $,! )he frame is

    brace% against si%eswa& along its wea$ aisbut si%eswa& is allowe% along the maor ais2+"8! ssume the en%s of the column to bepinne% at the base an% Be% at the top!

    56 5/9/16

    'olution

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    57/62

    'olution

     *u + 9?5 $,

    ;ass + 90  

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    58/62

    2 5 + "!0

    2 & + 1!0

    #u5 + #u& + .m 2 5#u5 + @!0 m

    2 u& + .!0m

    or *u+ 9?5 $, an% 2 &  + .!0m the

    selecte% section using the columnselection tables is ( "50 .9!1!

    5@ 5/9/16

     preferred e!ill2.0t"cl"#e 0.2 y

     x

    uy y

    ux x

    r r 

    l  K l  K  ⇒=

    rx 162

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    59/62

    ence 2 &8e7  is not critical with

    respect to 2 &!

     )rial 'ection ("50.9!1

    595/9/16

    ( )   mr r l  K 

    l  K 

    r r 

     y x

     x xeq y y

     y

     x

     7.316.20.8

    16.2

    ===

    =

    or * 9?5 $, an% 2 # . 0m

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    60/62

    or *u + 9?5 $, an% 2 &+ .!0m

     )rial 'ection ("50.9!1

    + 6"60 mm"  r5/r& + "!15 % + ".?mm

    bf  + "0" mm tf  + 11!0 mm tw +

    ?!. mm r5 + 106 mm r& + .9!3 mm

    605/9/16

    Ok 

    b

     f 

     f  15.8 1.9

    2r  =

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    61/62

    Maimum 'len%erness Chec$;+ @" "00 G$

  • 8/17/2019 Design of compression members-3

    62/62

    inal 'election ' 20 x 49.1

    Ok kN kN  P nc  9759861000626054.157   >=×=φ