27
Alexander Glaser WWS556d Princeton University April 16, 2007 Revision 6 Detection of Special Nuclear Materials 1

Detection of Special Nuclear Materialsaglaser/lecture2007_detection.pdf · Special Nuclear Materials (and in particular highly enriched uranium) have weak characteristic signatures

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    9

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Alexander GlaserWWS556dPrinceton UniversityApril 16, 2007

Revision 6

Detection ofSpecial Nuclear Materials

1

J. Kammeraad et al., Radiological and Nuclear CountermeasuresDepartment of Homeland Security, Briefing, 9 March 2004

2

J. Kammeraad et al., Radiological and Nuclear CountermeasuresDepartment of Homeland Security, Briefing, 9 March 2004

3

J. Kammeraad et al., Radiological and Nuclear CountermeasuresDepartment of Homeland Security, Briefing, 9 March 2004

4

Advanced Spectroscopic Portal (ASP)Spectroscopic analysis to reduce false alarms (“nuisance alarms”)

due to normally occurring radioactive material (NORM)

DNDO awarded contracts to three companies in July 2006Total cost: $1.1 billion over a five-year period

Several variants of the ASP(fixed-site, truck-mounted, and shuttle carrier-mounted systems)

Cargo Advanced Automated Radiography System (CAARS)

Detection of high-density material in cargo(Potential shielding for nuclear material to evade passive detection)

DNDO awarded contracts to three companies in September 2006Prototypes expected by mid-2009

Detector Technology(main systems currently being acquired by DHS/DNDO)

Statement before the House Science Committee by Vayl S. Oxford, 8 March 2007

5

“The Department of Homeland Security’s R&D Budget Priorities for Fiscal Year 2008”Opening Statement by Vayl S. Oxford (Director DNDO, DHS)

before the House Science CommitteeSubcommittee on Technology and Innovation

8 March 2007

The “Verification of Shielded SNM” Advanced Technology Demonstration (ATD), with final system design review expected in late FY 2009, “will develop and test advanced technology to resolve alarms and definitely verify the presence of SNM despite cluttered environments or intentional countermeasures like shielding.”

6

Detection Modes & Techniques

7

Detection Modes

passivedetection

NEUTRONS

PHOTONS(gammas)

LOOK FOR

activeinterrogation

PHOTONS(imaging)

NEUTRONS

USE LOOK FOR

NEUTRONS

PHOTONS(gammas)

NEUTRONS

PHOTONS(x-rays)

PHOTONS(gammas)

8

The Detection Dilemma

simple and saferather ineffective

against shielded SNM(in particular, HEU)

cannot be used inmany circumstances

(e.g. dose to humans)

able to trigger charac-teristic response by SNM

(e.g. fission)

Usability Performance

Passive modes

Active modes

9

Passive Detection(of highly enriched uranium by its gamma radiation)

Plutonium can be passivelydetected by its neutron emissions

NOT DISCUSSED BELOW

10

Decay Chains(simplified and incomplete)

Pu-242

Th-234Pa-234m

Pa-234

Pu-238

U-234

Th-230

U-238

Radium SeriesPu-239

Th-231 Pa-231

Th-227

U-235

Ac-227

Actinium Series

The most valuable gamma emission for detection purposes is a 1.001 MeV line of protactinium-234m(decay product of U-238, i.e. not U-235)

About 100 gammas per second and gram of U-238 at 1.001 MeV

11

Passive Detection of SNM

Detector

Special Nuclear Material

External Shielding

Criterion for detection of material

Minimum TM for given distanceor maximum distance R for given TM

Detector background

SB = B AD !

S TM > m!

SB TM

Totalemission rate

Attenuationfactors

Detectablefraction

Efficiencyof detector

Self-shieldingfor solid sphere of radius r

External shieldingof thickness d

S = (I ! M) (G ! F )

!

AD

4!R2

"

"

with andG !

3

4 µ r

!

1 " exp

"

"

4

3µ r

#$

F = exp

!

! ! d

"

This discussion follows: S. Fetter, V. A. Frolov, M. Miller, R. Mozley, O. F. Prilutsky, S. N. Rodionov, and R. Z. Sagdeev, “Detecting Nuclear Warheads,”Science & Global Security, Vol. 1, Nos. 3-4, 1990, pp. 225-253

12

Passive Detection of SNM

Gamma radiation 84,500/s at 1.001 MeV

Self-shielding of sphere G = 0.10 for µ = 1.41/cm

12 kg HEU(clean, 7% U-238)

EXTERNAL SHIELDING (10 cm of lead)

Correction F = 0.00045 for λ = 0.77/cm

TIME TO DETECTION (signal three standard deviations above background, m = 3)

130 minutes

Detectable fraction 0.08

Efficiency of detector 0.20

Background (B) for given gamma-energy 0.0017/(cm2 s)

DETECTOR (10,000 cm2 at a distance of 100 cm)

Background values are from S. Fetter et al. and D. Srikrishna et al., op. cit.

13

Time to Detection

Thickness of lead-shielding [cm]

Tim

e to

det

ectio

n [m

inut

es]

0 2 4 6 8 10 120

50

100

150

200

as a function of the shielding, for clean HEU (12 kg, 7% U-238)

(Detector with an effective area of 10,000 cm2 at 100 cm distance)

Time to detection:Weight of lead-shielding:

130 minutes164 kg

Time to detection:Weight of lead-shielding:

6 minutes105 kgTime to detection:

Weight of lead-shielding:17 seconds62 kg

14

Passive Detection of SNM

Gamma radiation 84,500/s at 1.001 MeV 321,600/s at 2.615 MeV 937,440/s at 0.769 MeV

Self-shielding of sphere G = 0.10 for µ = 1.41/cm G = 0.16 for µ = 0.87/cm G = 0.10 for µ = 2.08/cm

12 kg HEU(clean, 7% U-238)

12 kg HEU(contaminated, 0.00000001% U-232)

4 kg WPu(93% Pu-239)

Detectable fraction 0.08 0.08 0.08

Efficiency of detector 0.20 0.20 0.20

Background 0.0017/(cm2 s) 0.0003/(cm2 s) 0.0073/(cm2 s)

DETECTOR (10,000 cm2 at a distance of 100 cm)

EXTERNAL SHIELDING (10 cm of lead)

Correction F = 0.00045 for λ = 0.77/cm F = 0.00674 for λ = 0.50/cm F = 0.00004 for λ = 1.01/cm

TIME TO DETECTION (signal three standard deviations above background, m = 3)

130 minutes 0.2 seconds more than 10 hours

Note: plutonium can be passively detected by its neutron emissions

15

How Does a γ-Spectrum Look Like?

S. Fetter, T. B. Cochran, L. Grodzins, H. L. Lynch, and M. S. Zucker, “Measurements of Gamma Rays from a Soviet Cruise Missile,”Science, 248, 18 May 1990, pp. 828-834

This is what one would look for (in the case of clean HEU)

1989 “Black Sea Experiment” - Soviet SLCM, measurements on launch tube

16

GAO’s Assessment

Instead of using the results of its performance tests conducted in 2005, DNDO’s [cost-benefit] analysis simply assumed that ASPs could detect highly enriched uranium 95 percent of the time, a performance level far exceeding the capabilities of the new technology’s current demonstrated capabilities. The 2005 test results showed that the best of the three winning vendor monitors could only identify masked HEU* about 50 percent of the time.”

Masking is an attempt to hide dangerous nuclear or radiological material by placing it with benign radiological sources

*

Statement of G. Aloise, 14 March 2007

17

Active Detection(briefly)

18

“Nuclear Car Wash”(Livermore Concept)

D. R. Slaughter et al., “Preliminary results utilizing high-energy fission product γ-rays to detect fissionable material in cargo,”Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B, 241 (2005), 777-781

19

1

10

100

1000

10000

100000

0 20 40 60 80 100

Time [sec]

Gam

ma-

radi

atio

n ab

ove

3 M

eV [c

ount

s]

55 s decay

SNM target out

SNM target in

7.1 s decay

Sum of two curves

“Nuclear Car Wash”

14 MeV pulsed neutron sourceilluminates target/cargo-setup for30 seconds - followed by a 100-secondcounting interval (shown here)

Target/cargo setup: 380 grams of HEUwithin plywood (61 cm thickness)Detector distance: 2 meters

(Detection of beta-delayed high-energy gamma-radiation)

D. R. Slaughter et al., “Preliminary results utilizing high-energy fission product γ-rays to detect fissionable material in cargo,”Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B, 241 (2005), 777-781

20

Concept proposed by research group at University of Wisconsin (detection of delayed neutrons)R. Radel et al., Detection of HEU Using a Pulsed D-D Fusion Source, 2006 Technology of Fusion Energy Conference, 15 November 2006

Active Methods, cont’d

Active techniques usingpulsed neutron sources orhigh-energy gamma-raysrequire heavy shieldingand cannot be used withvehicles carrying passengers

21

These X-rays, viewed simultaneously, provide the most information about the contents of the truck's container. Transmission X-rays penetrate the mixed cargo providing a “shadowgram” X-ray (top) revealing dark anomalies indicating dense materials. The detailed Z Backscatter image (bottom) highlights lower density materials, providing context and clarity to expedite inspection.”

Imaging Techniques

American Science & Engineering, Inc.www.as-e.com

22

Imaging Techniques

American Science & Engineering, Inc.www.as-e.com

23

ZBV (Z Backscatter Van) - Promotional VideoAmerican Science & Engineering, Inc.

Imaging Techniques

24

Summary

Special Nuclear Materials (and in particular highly enriched uranium)have weak characteristic signatures

Passive Detection

Vulnerability to countermeasures (evasion of detection)

More robust than passive techniquesSeveral concepts under research and development

Active Detection

Intrusiveness may/will raise privacy (and possibly public health) issues

25

Summary

Detection Systems in GeneralNeeds uniform detection coverage across every transportation mode

Fixed-detector systems will likely displaceillicit trafficking to means of transport that avoid portals

(for a discussion, see for example D. Srikrishna et al.)

Focused on (and most effective at) points-of-entryabout 650 metric tons of HEU (40% of global inventory) are “already” in the United States

(mostly at military sites or in deployed nuclear weapons - but also at civilian research-reactor sites)

Complementary Approaches to Nuclear DetectionGlobal cleanout of civilian highly enriched uranium

(conversion of research reactors to low-enriched fuel, shutdown and defueling of unneeded facilities)

More general: no fissile materials in the nuclear fuel cycle(would include stopping reprocessing of spent fuel, i.e. separation of plutonium)

26

References

• S. Fetter, V. A. Frolov, M. Miller, R. Mozley, O. F. Prilutsky, S. N. Rodionov, and R. Z. Sagdeev, “Detecting Nuclear Warheads,” Science & Global Security, Vol. 1, Nos. 3-4, 1990, pp. 225-253

• S. Fetter, T. B. Cochran, L. Grodzins, H. L. Lynch, and M. S. Zucker, “Measurements of Gamma Rays from a Soviet Cruise Missile,” Science, 248, 18 May 1990, pp. 828-834

• D. Srikrishna, A. N. Chari, T. Tisch, “Deterrence of Nuclear Terrorism with Mobile Radiation Detectors,” The Nonproliferation Review, Volume 12, Number 3, Fall/Winter 2005, pp. 573-614

• D. R. Slaughter et al., “Preliminary results utilizing high-energy fission product γ-rays to detect fissionable material in cargo,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B, 241 (2005), pp. 777-781

• American Science & Engineering, Inc., www.as-e.com

27