Upload
rudolph-lewis-lester
View
224
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Learning Objectives
• Learn about the effects of emissivity uncertainty• Learn test methods to determine emissivity• Help laboratory customers to determine emissivity
© 2014 Fluke Calibration Liebmann – Emissivity Determination 2
Overview
• Introduction • Effects of Error in Estimating Emissivity• Methods for Determining Emissivity• Applying the Reflective Method to Diffuse Surfaces
– Reflective Method with Specular Surfaces– Reflective Method with Lambertian Surfaces– Reflective Method with Surfaces of Unknown Diffusivity– Uncertainty
• Practical Measurements• Conclusion• Acknowledgements• Questions
© 2014 Fluke Calibration Liebmann – Emissivity Determination 3
Overview
• Introduction • Effects of Error in Estimating Emissivity• Methods for Determining Emissivity• Applying the Reflective Method to Diffuse Surfaces
– Reflective Method with Specular Surfaces– Reflective Method with Lambertian Surfaces– Reflective Method with Surfaces of Unknown Diffusivity– Uncertainty
• Practical Measurements• Conclusion• Acknowledgements• Questions
© 2014 Fluke Calibration Liebmann – Emissivity Determination 4
Introduction
• Emissivity is essential to accurate IR thermometry measurement• Lack of credible information on emissivity• Existing methods to determine emissivity• Reflective method – practical for field usage
– Yamada and Ishii (2011)
© 2014 Fluke Calibration Liebmann – Emissivity Determination 5
Overview
• Introduction • Effects of Error in Estimating Emissivity• Methods for Determining Emissivity• Applying the Reflective Method to Diffuse Surfaces
– Reflective Method with Specular Surfaces– Reflective Method with Lambertian Surfaces– Reflective Method with Surfaces of Unknown Diffusivity– Uncertainty
• Practical Measurements• Conclusion• Acknowledgements• Questions
© 2014 Fluke Calibration Liebmann – Emissivity Determination 6
Effects of Error in Estimating Emissivity
• Effects due to emissivity estimation error can be large• Conditions for this graph
– εSURF = 0.96
– 8 – 14 µm radiation thermometer
– εIRT = 0.95
– TAMB = 23 °C
© 2014 Fluke Calibration Liebmann – Emissivity Determination 7
-50 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Surface Temperature / °C
erro
r /
K
Overview
• Introduction • Effects of Error in Estimating Emissivity• Methods for Determining Emissivity• Applying the Reflective Method to Diffuse Surfaces
– Reflective Method with Specular Surfaces– Reflective Method with Lambertian Surfaces– Reflective Method with Surfaces of Unknown Diffusivity– Uncertainty
• Practical Measurements• Conclusion• Acknowledgements• Questions
© 2014 Fluke Calibration Liebmann – Emissivity Determination 8
Methods for Determining Emissivity
• Comparison method– Part of surface must have known emissivity
• Contact versus non-contact method– Contact temperature may not be true surface temperature
• Blackbody method– Destructive
• FTIR testing– Laboratory measurement (for the most part)
• Emissivity tables– No uncertainties– Values vary greatly from table to table
• Reflective method – Novel method discussed here
© 2014 Fluke Calibration Liebmann – Emissivity Determination 9
Overview
• Introduction • Effects of Error in Estimating Emissivity• Methods for Determining Emissivity• Applying the Reflective Method to Diffuse Surfaces
– Reflective Method with Specular Surfaces– Reflective Method with Lambertian Surfaces– Reflective Method with Surfaces of Unknown Diffusivity– Uncertainty
• Practical Measurements• Conclusion• Acknowledgements• Questions
© 2014 Fluke Calibration Liebmann – Emissivity Determination 10
Theory
• Vary TW
• Observe change in S(TRT)
• Solve for εS
© 2014 Fluke Calibration Liebmann – Emissivity Determination 11
Measurement Equation IR ThermometryεIRT = 1.00
S(TRT): IR Thermometer ReadoutS(TS): Surface temperatureS(TW): Reflected temperatureεS: Surface emissivity
WSSSRT TSTSTS 1
Theory
• A portion of the reflected temperature (α) is coming from the heat source
• For a reference measurement the source is blocked making α = 0.
© 2014 Fluke Calibration Liebmann – Emissivity Determination 13
AMBHSW TSTSTS 1
Theory
• What is α?
© 2014 Fluke Calibration Liebmann – Emissivity Determination 14
AMBHS
REFRTS TSTS
TSTS
11
Reflective Method with Specular Surfaces
• For specular surfaces α = 1• This is the equation Yamada used
© 2014 Fluke Calibration Liebmann – Emissivity Determination 15
AMBHS
REFRTSPECS TSTS
TSTS
1
Reflective Method with Lambertian Surfaces
• Lamberts Cosine Law
© 2014 Fluke Calibration Liebmann – Emissivity Determination 16
cos0II
Reflective Method with Lambertian Surfaces
© 2014 Fluke Calibration Liebmann – Emissivity Determination 17
22
0
20
21
1sin
sin
HS
HS
SS
TOT
S
D
dI
I
F
F
Reflective Method with Surfaces of Unknown Diffusivity
• Initial measurements did were not as equation for Lambertian surfaces predicted
• However, this equation’s shape was preserved α(dHS)
© 2014 Fluke Calibration Liebmann – Emissivity Determination 18
30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 800.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.040
0.045
0.050
dHS / cm
alp
ha
21
11
HS
SAPP ad
2
2
0
20
21
1sin
sin
HS
HS
SS
TOT
S
D
dI
I
F
F
Process
© 2014 Fluke Calibration Liebmann – Emissivity Determination 19
AMBHS
REFRTSPECS TSTS
TSTS
1
(6) (12)
21
11
HS
SAPP ad
Uncertainty
• Uncertainty analysis elements– Radiation Thermometer Readout– Reference Readout– Heat source Calibration– Ambient Temperature Readout– Heat Source Distance– Heat Source Diameter– Radiation Thermometer Alignment– Repeatability
© 2014 Fluke Calibration Liebmann – Emissivity Determination 20
Overview
• Introduction • Effects of Error in Estimating Emissivity• Methods for Determining Emissivity• Applying the Reflective Method to Diffuse Surfaces
– Reflective Method with Specular Surfaces– Reflective Method with Lambertian Surfaces– Reflective Method with Surfaces of Unknown Diffusivity– Uncertainty
• Practical Measurements• Conclusion• Acknowledgements• Questions
© 2014 Fluke Calibration Liebmann – Emissivity Determination 21
Practical Measurements
• Heat Source– Fluke Calibration 4181– Generally used at 200 °C
– dHS 2.5 to 5 times that of DHS
• Radiation Thermometer– Fluke 568– 1.9 cm spot size
• 11 surfaces measured
© 2014 Fluke Calibration Liebmann – Emissivity Determination 22
Results
© 2014 Fluke Calibration Liebmann – Emissivity Determination 23
Data Set Sample Type εS
U(ε) (k = 2)
Comparison Value
ε Type
1 Painted Wall 0.9466 0.0033 0.88 – 0.96 Table
2 Stainless Steel 0.2993 0.0253 0.16 – 0.79 Table
3 Cardboard 0.9436 0.0032 0.81 – 0.94 Table
4 Glass 0.8617 0.0032 0.68 – 0.95 Table
5 Aluminum 0.1530 0.0030 0.09 – 0.31 Table
6 White Board 0.9507 0.0008 0.84 – 0.95 Table
7 Flat Plate 0.9495 0.0123 0.9394Contact v
Radiometric
8 Flat Plate 0.9505 0.0157 0.9448Contact v
Radiometric
9 Flat Plate 0.9463 0.0081 0.9459Contact v
Radiometric
10 Flat Plate 0.9501 0.0122 0.9459Contact v
Radiometric
11 Flat Plate 0.9275 0.0107 0.9187Contact v
Radiometric
Results
© 2014 Fluke Calibration Liebmann – Emissivity Determination 24
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
0.850
0.855
0.860
0.865
0.870
dhs / cm
εs
40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85
0.150
0.151
0.152
0.153
0.154
0.155
0.156
dhs / cm
εs
25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
0.940
0.945
0.950
0.955
0.960
dhs / cm
εs
Set 4Glass
Set 5Aluminum
Set 7Flat Plate
Results
© 2014 Fluke Calibration Liebmann – Emissivity Determination 25
Set 7 Set 8 Set 9 Set 10 Set 110.91
0.92
0.93
0.94
0.95
0.96
0.97
Refl
R v C
emis
sivi
ty
Overview
• Introduction • Effects of Error in Estimating Emissivity• Methods for Determining Emissivity• Applying the Reflective Method to Diffuse Surfaces
– Reflective Method with Specular Surfaces– Reflective Method with Lambertian Surfaces– Reflective Method with Surfaces of Unknown Diffusivity– Uncertainty
• Practical Measurements• Conclusion• Acknowledgements• Questions
© 2014 Fluke Calibration Liebmann – Emissivity Determination 26
Conclusion
The reflective method…• Works well on large surfaces• Works fair on smaller surfaces• In-situ type measurement
– Can be done in field– Quick
© 2014 Fluke Calibration Liebmann – Emissivity Determination 27
Overview
• Introduction • Effects of Error in Estimating Emissivity• Methods for Determining Emissivity• Applying the Reflective Method to Diffuse Surfaces
– Reflective Method with Specular Surfaces– Reflective Method with Lambertian Surfaces– Reflective Method with Surfaces of Unknown Diffusivity– Uncertainty
• Practical Measurements• Conclusion• Acknowledgements• Questions
© 2014 Fluke Calibration Liebmann – Emissivity Determination 28
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank the many people who have made this research possible. • Yoshiro Yamada
– Provided the author with details of his research
• Fluke Calibration – Provided the author with time, laboratory space, and equipment– Time to analyze the resulting data.
© 2014 Fluke Calibration Liebmann – Emissivity Determination 29
Overview
• Introduction • Effects of Error in Estimating Emissivity• Methods for Determining Emissivity• Applying the Reflective Method to Diffuse Surfaces
– Reflective Method with Specular Surfaces– Reflective Method with Lambertian Surfaces– Reflective Method with Surfaces of Unknown Diffusivity– Uncertainty
• Practical Measurements• Conclusion• Acknowledgements• Questions
© 2014 Fluke Calibration Liebmann – Emissivity Determination 30