Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Development Assessment
Unit
Tuesday, 07 March 2017
THE H
ILLS S
HIR
E C
OU
NC
IL
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 07 MARCH, 2017
ITEM SUBJECT PAGE
ITEM-1 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES 3
ITEM-2 DA NO. 136/2015/JP/A - SECTION 96(1A)
MODIFICATION TO AN APPROVED RESIDENTIAL
FLAT BUILDING DEVELOPMENT - LOT 42, 43, 44
& 45 DP 1171547 SWIFT PARROT CLOSE,
KELLYVILLE
5
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 07 MARCH, 2017
PAGE 3
MINUTES OF THE DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING HELD AT THE
HILLS SHIRE COUNCIL ON TUESDAY, 28 FEBRUARY 2017
PRESENT
Cameron McKenzie Group Manager – Environment & Planning (Chair)
Paul Osborne Manager – Development Assessment
Andrew Brooks Manager – Subdivision & Development Certification
Mark Colburt Manager – Environment & Health
Craig Woods Manager – Regulatory Services
Brent Woodhams Forward Planning Co-ordinator
Kristine McKenzie Principal Executive Planner
APOLOGIES
Stewart Seale Manager – Forward Planning
TIME OF COMMENCEMENT
8:30am
TIME OF COMPLETION
8:40am
ITEM-1 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
RESOLUTION
The Minutes of the Development Assessment Unit Meeting of Council held on 21
February 2017 be confirmed.
ITEM-2 DA NO. 570/2017/LD - DEMOLITION OF EXISTING
STRUCTURES AND CONSTRUCTION OF A DWELLING
ON PROPOSED LOT 2 IN A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 43
DP 6722, NO. 120 OLD NORTHERN ROAD,
BAULKHAM HILLS
RESOLUTION
The application be approved subject to conditions as set out in the report with Condition
No. 1 to be amended as follows:
1. Development in Accordance with Submitted Plans
The development being carried out in accordance with the following approved plans and
details, as amended in red, stamped and returned with this consent except where
amended by other conditions of consent.
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 07 MARCH, 2017
PAGE 4
The amendment in red relates to the rear ground floor balcony which is required to have
a solid balustrade.
REFERENCED PLANS AND DOCUMENTS
DRAWING NO. DESCRIPTION REVISION DATE
DA000 Cover Page B 07/12/2016
DA001 Demolition Plan A 16/09/2016
DA002 Site Plan A 16/09/2016
DA003 Basement Floor Plan B 07/12/2016
DA004 Ground Floor Plan B 07/12/2016
DA005 First Floor Plan B 07/12/2016
DA006 Second Floor Plan A 16/09/2016
DA007 Sections B 07/12/2016
DA008 Front and Rear Elevations B 07/12/2016
DA009 Side Elevations B 07/12/2016
DA010 Area Calculations A 16/09/2016
DA017 External Colours and Finishes B 07/12/2016
L101 Landscape Plan A 19/09/2016
No work (including excavation, land fill or earth reshaping) shall be undertaken prior to
the issue of the Construction Certificate, where a Construction Certificate is required.
END MINUTES
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 07 MARCH, 2017
PAGE 5
ITEM-2 DA NO. 136/2015/JP/A - SECTION 96(1A)
MODIFICATION TO AN APPROVED RESIDENTIAL
FLAT BUILDING DEVELOPMENT - LOT 42, 43, 44 &
45 DP 1171547 SWIFT PARROT CLOSE, KELLYVILLE
THEME: Balanced Urban Growth
OUTCOME: 7 Responsible planning facilitates a desirable living
environment and meets growth targets.
STRATEGY:
7.2 Manage new and existing development with a robust
framework of policies, plans and processes that is in
accordance with community needs and expectations.
MEETING DATE: 7 MARCH 2017
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT
AUTHOR: DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT COORDINATOR
ROBERT BUCKHAM
RESPONSIBLE OFFICER: PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE PLANNER
KRISTINE MCKENZIE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Development Consent was granted by the then Joint Regional Planning Panel (now
Sydney West Central Planning Panel) on 5 March 2015 for five x five storey buildings
containing 185 dwellings with 424 car parking spaces within the basement. The
approved development provided 20 x 1 bedroom units, 145 x 2 bedroom units and 20 x
3 bedroom units.
The subject modification application is for a modified design that results in an additional
eight units, an alternate mix of units and other minor design amendments. The modified
development does not alter building footprints, setbacks or building heights.
The modified proposal will provide for a total 193 units resulting in 36 x 1 bedroom
units, 119 x 2 bedroom units and 38 x 3 bedroom units. In addition, parking will be
increased to 428 spaces.
The proposal remains compliant with Council’s LEP, DCP, and the provisions of SEPP 65
and the Apartment Design Guideline.
Two submissions were received to the proposal which raise concern regarding balcony
design and privacy impacts, the impact of additional population, construction noise,
building height and garbage facilities. These matters are addressed in detail in the report
and have either been addressed by the modified design or were addressed as part of the
original application.
The application is recommended for approval.
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 07 MARCH, 2017
PAGE 6
BACKGROUND MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS
Applicant: JQ Point Pty Ltd. 1. Section 79C (EP&A Act) –
Satisfactory
Owner: JQ Point Pty Ltd.
2. Section 96 (EP&A Act) - Satisfactory
Zoning: R4 High Density
Residential
3. LEP 2012 – Satisfactory.
Area:
Existing Development:
22,819m2
Vacant Land
4. SEPP 65 – Design Quality of
Apartment Development –
Satisfactory
5. State Environmental Planning Policy
No 55—Remediation of Land –
Satisfactory
6. DCP Part D Section 5 –
Kellyville/Rouse Hill Release Area –
Satisfactory
7. DCP Part B Section 5 – Residential
Flat Buildings – Satisfactory
8. DCP Part C Section 1 – Parking –
Satisfactory.
9. Section 94 Contribution:
$2,316,726.32
SUBMISSIONS REASON FOR REFERRAL TO DAU
1. Exhibition: Not Required 1. More than one submission to a
Section 96 Application.
2. Notice Adj Owners: Yes, 14 days
3. Number Advised: 49
4. Submissions
Received:
Two POLITICAL DONATION – None disclosed
HISTORY
05/05/2015 Development Application 136/2015/JP approved by the then
Joint Regional Planning Panel (now Sydney West Central
Planning Panel).
13/04/2016 Subject Section 96(1A) Modification 136/2015/JP/A lodged.
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 07 MARCH, 2017
PAGE 7
21/09/2016 Concerns raised in an objection regarding overlooking and
privacy forwarded to the applicant for consideration. The
objection specifically requested obscure glazed balustrades
minimum 1.2m high on balconies on the west elevation of Block
A and the west elevation of units on the northern half of Block
B in combination with tall and dense landscaping to the front of
the building.
17/10/2016 Applicant advised that they do not agree to the requested
changes relating to balcony balustrade design and materials.
PROPOSAL
Development Consent was granted by the then Joint Regional Planning Panel (now
Sydney West Central Planning Panel) on 5 March 2015 for for five x five storey buildings
containing 185 dwellings with 424 car parking spaces within the basement. The
approved development provided 20 x 1 bedroom units, 145 x 2 bedroom units and 20 x
3 bedroom units.
This Section 96(1A) Modification seeks to amend the following:
Increase in the overall unit numbers by eight additional units (total 193) resulting in
the following mix;
36 x 1 bedroom units;
119 x 2 bedroom units;and
38 x 3 bedroom units.
Removal of tennis court and the relocation of the approved swimming pool to the
vacated tennis court location. A half basketball court is provided in the previous
location of the approved swimming pool.
Improved cross ventilation to some units through the provision of additional windows
to bathrooms and ensuites or relocating the position of other windows.
Entry canopy added to each entry/exit point for Blocks A, B, C, D and E.
The addition of columns to corners of balconies for greater structural stability.
Removal of balcony planters to all Level 4 units which will be replaced by privacy
screens.
Car parking spaces increased from 424 to 428, including 350 resident and 78 visitor
spaces.
Two balconies on level 1 are proposed to be amended from soild masonary to open
style aluminum construction.
ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION
1. The Hills Local Environmental Plan 2012
(i) Permissibility
The proposal is defined as a residential flat building:
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 07 MARCH, 2017
PAGE 8
“residential flat building” means a building containing 3 or more dwellings, but does
not include an attached dwelling or multi dwelling housing.
A residential flat building remains permissible within the R4 High Density Residential
zone.
(ii) The Hills LEP 2012 - Development Standards
The following addresses the principal development standards of the LEP relevant to the
subject proposal:
CLAUSE REQUIRED PROVIDED COMPLIES
4.3 Height of
buildings
16 metres 16 metres Yes
2. Compliance with The Hills Development Control Plan
The proposal has been assessed against the provisions of The Hills Development Control
Plan (THDCP) particularly:-
Part B Section 5 – Residential Flat Buildings
Part C Section 1 – Parking
Part C Section 3 – Landscaping
Part D Section 5 – Kellyville Rouse Hill Release Area
The proposed development achieves compliance with the relevant requirements of the
DCP. The development, with eight additional units and amended units mix, remains
compliant with Council unit mix and size controls. In addition the parking continues to
comply with the DCP requirements.
The proposal is considered satisfactory in regard to the DCP requirements.
3. Compliance with State Environmental Planning Policy (SEPP) No. 65 –
Design Quality of Residential Apartment Development and Apartment
Design Guideline
The amended proposal contains minor changes to the approved development. The
majority of the revisions are internal changes which respond to the detailed design.
The building configuration and size is predominantly unchanged, with the exception of an
increase in unit numbers. It is noted that the additional units will not have an impact on
the overall natural ventilation and solar access calculations. The relevant provisions of
the Residential Apartment Design Code are addressed below:
Height: No changes to the approved height.
Setbacks: No changes to approved setbacks.
Landscape Design: No changes to the approved landscape plan.
Apartment Sizes: The eight additional units comply with the minimum unit size
requirements.
Balconies: The balconies associated with the eight additional units comply with the
minimum balcony depth.
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 07 MARCH, 2017
PAGE 9
Internal Circulation: No changes to the approved internal circulation for the five
buildings.
Storage: The eight additional units are provided with appropriate storage space
within the basement level and the unit.
Energy Efficiency: An updated BASIX certificate indicates energy efficiency for each
residential unit, including the proposed additional units.
Solar Access: Development continues to comply with solar access requirements with
71% or 137 units achieving the minimum of 3 hours of solar access at mid-winter
(ADG criteria is 70%).
Natural Ventilation: Proposal will increase the overall percentage of units that receive
natural ventilation, with a total of 90% of units to receive natural ventilation.
The proposal is considered satisfactory in regard to SEPP 65 and ADG requirements.
4. Section 96 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979
Under the provisions of Section 96 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act,
1979, Council may, in response to an application, modify a consent if the development,
as modified, is substantially the same development as originally approved.
The proposed modification involves minor changes to the built form which are considered
reasonable given that:
a. There are no changes to building footprints;
b. There is no change to overall use of the building or site.
The proposed modifications are minor and do not impact upon compliance with the
requirements of SEPP 65, LEP 2012 or Council’s DCP. The proposal continues to comply
with the provisions of the relevant planning controls and is satisfactory in terms of the
aims and objectives of the SEPP.
The proposed modification is considered to be substantially the same development as
originally approved by Council.
The original development was determined by JRPP as the Capital Investment Value
exceeded $20 million. In addition, regional panels are also responsible for determining
applications to modify a consent for regionally significant development under Section
96(2) of the EP & A Act. As the proposed modification is under the provisions of Section
96(1A) of the EP & A Act, Council is the determining body for the application.
5. Issues Raised in Submissions
The application was notified for a period of 14 days. Two submissions were received. The
issues (summarised) raised within the submissions are outlined within the following
table.
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 07 MARCH, 2017
PAGE 10
ISSUE/OBJECTION COMMENT OUTCOME
Concern is raised regarding
overlooking and privacy
into the backyard of our
property. Obscure glazed
balustrades minimum 1.2m
high on balconies on the
west elevation of Block A
and the west elevation of
units on the northern half
of Block B in combination
with tall and dense
landscaping to the front of
the building would address
our concern.
With the exception of two balcony
balustrades on the first floor, all
balcony balustrades on Buildings A
and B were approved as aluminium
open style construction. Two
balconies on Level 1 are proposed to
be amended from solid masonry to
an aluminium open style construction
consistent with all other balustrades,
all other balustrades referred to are
proposed to remain as approved.
A comparison between the façade
design of Building A and B is
provided at Attachment 7. It is
considered that overall, the design of
the facades and balcony treatments
is consistent with that of the
approved development.
The alteration to the building layouts
has however resulted in additional
balcony area fronting Swift Parrot
Close. Given the resultant additional
increase in balcony area fronting
Swift Parrot Close and the orientation
of the balconies to the private open
space area of No. 1 Blue Wren Way it
is considered appropriate to
recommend that all balconies on the
western elevation of Building A and
the west elevation on the northern
half of Building B be provided with
solid balustrades or obscure glazed
balustrades to limit the opportunity
for direct overlooking of the property
to the west.
Issue addressed.
Refer Condition
No.1.
An increase in unit numbers
and car spaces. Already
the Grey Gum Estate is
becoming over-populated
and once these units are
built it will create traffic
chaos, especially during
netball season. The
applicant should be made
to adhere to the original DA
and not try and 'squeeze' in
even more units/car
spaces.
Whilst there will be a minor increase
in vehicle trips as a result of the
additional eight units, the impact on
the operational efficiency of the
single lane circulating roundabout on
Withers Road is negligible. To verify
this statement and by utilising the
future predicted traffic volumes for
Withers Road contained within the
North Kellyville Traffic Assessment, in
house SIDRA modelling has
confirmed that the single lane
roundabout at Withers Road and the
estate access will continue to operate
at a satisfactory level of service up
until approximately 2019, at which
Issue addressed.
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 07 MARCH, 2017
PAGE 11
ISSUE/OBJECTION COMMENT OUTCOME
time an upgrade to two circulating
lanes will be required to reduce
queue lengths on the eastern
approach of Withers Road. It is also
noted that parking has been provided
in accordance with the DCP
requirements.
Given the size of the
development and noise
from ground works, Council
should pro-actively restrict
rock breaking noise to the
hours of Monday to Friday
9am to 3pm prior to
residents having to
complain. Council is well
aware of how loud and
disturbing the rock
breaking is, so why wait for
local residents to complain
about it?
In order to provide clarification to the
applicant in relation to rock breaking,
a condition has been added in
relation to rock breaking.
The condition states:
Upon receipt of a justified complaint
in relation to noise pollution
emanating from rock breaking as
part of the excavation and
construction processes, rock breaking
will be restricted to between the
hours of 9am to 3pm, Monday to
Friday.
Details of noise mitigation measures
and likely duration of the activity will
also be required to be submitted to
Council’s Manager – Environment and
Health within seven (7) days of
receiving notice from Council.
Council’s Development Monitoring
Team will action any complaints in
relation to construction noise.
Issue addressed.
Refer to
additional
Condition 64A.
Are garbage facilities being
increased?
The approved garbage room is able
to cater for the required bin storage
required by the proposed
modifications.
Issue addressed.
Are the finished building
heights staying within the
16m height restriction?
The proposed modifications do not
alter the height of the building. The
building remains compliant with the
16m height level control.
Issue addressed.
SUBDIVISION ENGINEERING COMMENTS
No objection raised to the proposal. An amended condition is recommended to reflect
turning bays required at intercom points (Refer Condition No 17).
WASTE MANAGEMENT COMMENTS
No objection raised to the proposal. An amended condition relating to bin numbers in
recommended to reflect the revised waste arrangements for the development (Refer
Condition No. 23).
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 07 MARCH, 2017
PAGE 12
CONCLUSION
The proposed development has been assessed against the relevant heads of
consideration under Section 79C and 96 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment
Act, 1979, the provisions of LEP 2012, DCP Part B Section 5 – Residential Flat Buildings,
Part C Section 1 Parking and Part C Section 3 Landscaping and is considered satisfactory.
The issues raised within the submissions have been addressed and do not warrant
refusal of the application.
Approval is recommended subject to conditions.
IMPACTS:
Financial
This matter has no direct financial impact upon Council's adopted budget or forward
estimates.
The Hills Future Community Strategic Plan
The proposed development is consistent with the planning principles, vision and
objectives outlined within “Hills 2026 – Looking Towards the Future” as the proposed
development provides for satisfactory urban growth without adverse environmental or
social amenity impacts and ensures a consistent built form is provided with respect to
the streetscape and general locality.
RECOMMENDATION
The Modification Application be approved subject to the following:
Conditions Nos. 1, 3, 17, 23, 29, 30 and 57 be deleted and replaced as follows:
1. Development in Accordance with Submitted Plans (as amended)
The development being carried out in accordance with the following approved plans and
details, stamped and returned with Development Consent 135/2015/JP including the
amendments in red and as further modified by this consent except where amended by
other conditions of consent.
As detailed in red on the plans all balconies on the western elevation of Building A and
the western elevation on the northern half of Building B shall be provided with solid
balustrades or obscure glazed balustrades.
REFERENCED PLANS
DRAWING NO. DESCRIPTION SHEET REVISION DATE
14-025 Site / Site Analysis Plan 01 E 08/04/2016
14-025 Basement Plan 02 E 08/04/2016
14-025 Ground Floor Plan 03 E 08/04/2016
14-025 First Floor Plan 04 E 08/04/2016
14-025 Second Floor Plan 05 E 08/04/2016
14-025 Third Floor Plan 06 E 08/04/2016
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 07 MARCH, 2017
PAGE 13
14-025 Fourth Floor Plan 07 E 08/04/2016
14-025 Roof Plan 08 E 08/04/2016
14-025 Elevations 09 E 08/04/2016
14-025 Sections 10 E 08/04/2016
14-025 Sections 11 E 08/04/2016
14-025 Schedule of Finishes 15 E 08/04/2016
No work (including excavation, land fill or earth reshaping) shall be undertaken prior to
the issue of the Construction Certificate, where a Construction Certificate is required.
3. Provision of Parking Spaces
The development is required to be provided with 350 resident spaces and 78 visitor
spaces being a total 428 off-street car parking spaces. These car parking spaces shall be
available for off street parking at all times.
17. Vehicular Access and Parking
The formation, surfacing and drainage of all driveways, parking modules, circulation
roadways and ramps are required, with their design and construction complying with:
a) AS/ NZS 2890.1
b) AS/ NZS 2890.6
c) AS 2890.2
d) Council’s DCP Part C Section 1 – Parking
e) Council’s Driveway Specifications
Where conflict exists the Australian Standard must be used.
The following must be provided:
i. All driveways, car parking areas and service area must be prominently and
permanently line marked, signposted and maintained to ensure entry and exit is
in a forward direction at all times and that parking and traffic circulation is
appropriately controlled.
ii. The design must consider the largest design service vehicle expected to enter the
site. All three driveways are to be redesigned to ensure compliant to design
standards.
iii. The middle driveway that also provides access for service vehicles must be
redesigned to ensure design compliant, also with respect to ramp grades and
rates of change of grade in accordance with Table 3.2 of AS 2890.2.
iv. The bottom part of the middle driveway, where waste collection service is
proposed, the area must be designed to provide adequate vertical clearance 3.5m
(Table 4.1 of AS 2890.2) and adequate manoeuvring area to facilitate operation
of service vehicles in forward direction.
v. All driveways and car parking areas must be graded, collected and drained by pits
and pipes to a suitable point of legal discharge.
vi. A turning area within the proposed driveway entrance/ intercom location to
ensure visitor vehicles are able to manoeuver and the leave the site in forward
direction using a combined three point turn manoeuvring should intercom is not
answered and access denied.
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 07 MARCH, 2017
PAGE 14
23. Construction of Waste Storage Area
All work involving construction of the central waste storage room is required to comply
with the requirements of Council’s ‘Bin Storage Facility Design Specifications’. Further to
these requirements, the room must also be adequately ventilated (mechanically) and
internally light (artificial light). Storage facility must be provided for a minimum number
of 21 x 1100L bulk garbage bins and 97 x 240L recycling bins. The measurements of an
1100L and 240L bin are as follows:
240L: 735mm (d) 580mm (w) 1080mm (h)
1100L: 1245mm (d) 1370mm (w) 1470mm (h)
29. Section 94 Contribution
The following monetary contributions must be paid to Council in accordance with Section
94 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979, to provide for the
increased demand for public amenities and services resulting from the development.
Payments comprise of the following:-
The contributions above are applicable at the time this consent was issued. Please be
aware that Section 94 contributions are updated quarterly.
Prior to payment of the above contributions, the applicant is advised to contact Council’s
Development Contributions Officer on 9843 0268. Payment must be made by cheque or
credit/debit card. Cash payments will not be accepted.
This condition has been imposed in accordance with Contributions Plan No 8.
Council’s Contributions Plans can be viewed at www.thehills.nsw.gov.au or a copy may
be inspected or purchased at Council’s Administration Centre.
30. Property Numbering and Letterbox Location
The responsibility for property numbering is vested solely in Council.
The property address for this development is: -
3 Swift Parrot Close, Kellyville NSW 2155 (entry point 3 between Block E and Block D)
5 Swift Parrot Close, Kellyville NSW 2155 (entry point 2 between Block D and Block C)
7 Swift Parrot Close, Kellyville NSW 2155 (entry point 1 between Block A and Block B)
Land Information has prepared marked plans (from plans supplied by Architect dated
20/11/2015 Issue E) to reflect correct Unit numbering as per the NSW Address Policy
(6.5.5) dated March 2015. Plans relating to this development must be numbered by
applicant so that any reference to a particular unit for any purpose, including marketing,
will reflect the approved numbering. Note: Unit numbers cannot be repeated anywhere
throughout the site – regardless of building name or number.
Unit Numbering (clockwise from lift location)
Levels Block A Block B Block C Block D Block E
Ground G01-G09 G10-G18 G19-G26 G27-G34 G35-G42
1st 101-109 110-118 119-126 127-134 135-142
2nd 201-209 210-218 219-226 227-234 235-242
3rd 301-309 310-318 319-326 327-334 335-342
4th 401-405 406-410 411-415 416-420 421-425
1br per Unit 2br per Unit 3br per Unit Credit 1 Bedroom: 36 2 Bedroom: 119 3 Bedroom: 38 Credits: 4 Section 94
Open Space - Land 3,553.01$ 5,739.47$ 7,379.32$ 10,112.40$ 127,908.36$ 682,996.93$ 280,414.16$ 40,449.60$ 1,050,869.85$
Open Space - Capital 1,461.34$ 2,360.62$ 3,035.08$ 4,159.19$ 52,608.24$ 280,913.78$ 115,333.04$ 16,636.76$ 432,218.30$
Community Facilities - Land 76.56$ 123.68$ 159.02$ 217.91$ 2,756.16$ 14,717.92$ 6,042.76$ 871.64$ 22,645.20$
Community Facilities - Capital 662.84$ 1,070.75$ 1,376.67$ 1,886.55$ 23,862.24$ 127,419.25$ 52,313.46$ 7,546.20$ 196,048.75$
Studies and Administration 101.93$ 164.65$ 211.70$ 290.11$ 3,669.48$ 19,593.35$ 8,044.60$ 1,160.44$ 30,146.99$
Roadworks - Land 585.41$ 945.66$ 1,215.85$ 1,666.16$ 21,074.76$ 112,533.54$ 46,202.30$ 6,664.64$ 173,145.96$
Roadworks - Capital 1,391.80$ 2,248.29$ 2,890.66$ 3,961.28$ 50,104.80$ 267,546.51$ 109,845.08$ 15,845.12$ 411,651.27$
Total 7,832.89$ 12,653.12$ 16,268.30$ 22,293.60$ 281,984.04$ 1,505,721.28$ 618,195.40$ 89,174.40$ 2,316,726.32$
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 07 MARCH, 2017
PAGE 15
These numbers, unless otherwise approved by Council in writing, are to be displayed
clearly on all door entrances.
Clear and accurate external directional signage is to be erected on site at driveway entry
points and on buildings. Unit numbering signage is also required on stairway access
doors and lobby entry doors. It is essential that all numbering signage throughout the
complex is clear to assist emergency service providers locate a destination with ease and
speed.
Please also request unit numbering plans be submitted – numbered as above with
reference to plans prepared by Land Information.
Written correspondence from Australia Post, certifying their approval to the proposed
location of the letterboxes must accompany this plan. Australia post normally requires
there be one (1) single group of cluster letterboxes. Should more than one (1) cluster
be required, or should a combination of cluster and individual be required, Australia Post
approval is necessary.
57. Compliance with BASIX Certificate
Under clause 97A of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000, it is a
condition of this Development Consent that all commitments listed in BASIX Certificate
No. 562506M_02 be complied with. Any subsequent version of this BASIX Certificate will
supersede all previous versions of the certificate.
A Section 96 Application may be required should the subsequent version of this BASIX
Certificate necessitate design changes to the development. However, a Section 96
Application will be required for a BASIX Certificate with a new number.
Condition 64A be added:
64A. Rock Breaking Noise
Upon receipt of a justified complaint in relation to noise pollution emanating from rock
breaking as part of the excavation and construction processes, rock breaking will be
restricted to between the hours of 9am to 3pm, Monday to Friday.
Details of noise mitigation measures and likely duration of the activity will also be
required to be submitted to Council’s Manager – Environment and Health within seven
(7) days of receiving notice from Council.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Locality Plan
2. Aerial Photograph
3. Approved Site Plan
4. Proposed Site Plan
5. Approved Elevations
6. Proposed Elevations
7. Comparison of Facades
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 07 MARCH, 2017
PAGE 16
ATTACHMENT 1 – LOCALITY PLAN
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 07 MARCH, 2017
PAGE 17
ATTACHMENT 2 – AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 07 MARCH, 2017
PAGE 18
ATTACHMENT 3 – APPROVED SITE PLAN
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 07 MARCH, 2017
PAGE 19
ATTACHMENT 4 – PROPOSED SITE PLAN
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 07 MARCH, 2017
PAGE 20
ATTACHMENT 5 – APPROVED ELEVATIONS
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 07 MARCH, 2017
PAGE 21
ATTACHMENT 6 – PROPOSED ELEVATIONS
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING 07 MARCH, 2017
PAGE 22
ATTACHMENT 7 – COMPARISON OF FACADES
Block A Block B
Approved facade Block A and B. Note solid balustrade on
first floor of Block A only
Proposed Facades of Block A and B.